Windfarm Roundup March 19 2006
'Enough is enough': wind farm builder threatens to quit UK
By Tim
Webb
Published: 19 March 2006
One of the UK's largest wind farm developers has threatened to pull out of
the country as a storm blows up over the Government's plans for renewable
energy.
A logjam in the planning process for developers means that many wind farms
will not be operational for a decade. Unless financing rules are changed, Wind
Energy is warning that many will never even get built, which could force the
Government to miss its targets on renewable energy.
The timing of the protest is embarrassing for the Government, which next
month will close consultation on its energy review on nuclear power. Its
previous review - only three years ago - was supposed to back renewable energy
such as wind power.
Wind Energy wants to build 800MW of onshore wind farms in Scotland, enough
to power a city the size of Edinburgh.
National Grid has told the company, and developers of around 100 other wind
farms in Scotland, totalling around 6,000MW, that they will not be connected to
the grid before 2016.
But despite the huge timelag, developers still have to table deposits
upfront to cover the cost of the upgrades to the grid - even if planning
permission for their site is not granted and the wind farm does not go
ahead.
Under the planning regime, developers have to apply for connection to the
grid before they can gain planning permission. Around half the planning
applications for onshore wind farms in the UK fail.
Even if a developer secures planning approval and does not lose its deposit
for connection, it is not home and dry. Should a nearby wind farm plan fall
through, the other developers sharing the planned upgrade to the grid have to
shoulder the failed developer's liabilities.
Mike Davies, managing director of Wind Energy, said developers should be
able to delay payment until a decision on planning permission is made.
He added that developers had earned a temporary reprieve, until September,
before they have to start paying millions of pounds in connection fees to
National Grid.
"We are relying on the Government to sort this out in the next six months.
Unless things change, we would have to say 'enough is enough - we are pulling
out'. We will move to other countries where these projects are easier to develop
instead. Trying to get through the regulatory and planning system in the UK is
like running in treacle. It needs some movement from the top urgently."
The Government has set a target to generate a 10th of the UK's electricity,
or around 7,000MW, from renewable sources by 2010 rising to a fifth by
2020.
---
LETTERS SUPPORTING WINDFARM FROM OTHER
REGIONS
Next Story | Previous Story | Back to list
Be the first reader to
comment on this story
12:30 - 18 March 2006
Protesters against
a proposed windfarm near Normanby were horrified to find letters supporting the
application had not come from North Lincolnshire.
As previously reported, North Lincolnshire
Council received 420 letters about the application, with around 400 supporting
the proposal. But Marion Green, of the Flixborough Residents' Association, said
around 390 were form letters sent from around the country.
However, council officials said they had to
log any letters of support or objection they received, wherever they came
from.
The proposal by Wind Prospect is to build
nine wind turbines on Normanby Estate, near Normanby, which will be 125 metres
tall.
Mrs Green said: "My husband and I went to
look at the letters and they were all identical.
"We thought it was odd because there seemed
to be only a few people in our village who were in support of it. The letters
have come from towns in England and Wales, and there are hardly any from North
Lincolnshire.
"It's important, because these people aren't
going to be living near the windfarm, or in the area affected by
it."
Previously, the council had received
objections from parish councils in Flixborough, Burton-Upon-Stather and
Roxby.
Tony Lyman, head of planning and
regeneration at the council, said: "If the letters are duly submitted in the
time period for consultation, and they are in support, we have to take them into
account," he said.
"393 letters were in a pro forma style -
meaning they are the same - but we would be challenged if we ignored them. The
application is still live, so I can't comment on the effect these letters could
have. We have to put all the information before the members before they make a
decision."
The application will be debated again at the
next planning meeting, due to be held at Pittwood House on March
30.
---
Wind farm raises home value
fears
RESIDENTS living near a proposed wind farm
in Midlothian fear their properties will drop in value as a result of the
development.
The controversial plans to erect 18 wind
turbines at a popular beauty spot at Auchencorth Moss, near Penicuik - on a
country estate owned by Sir Robert Clerk - are designed to provide an
alternative source of power for 22,000 homes.
But local residents are up in arms about the
project, and Midlothian Council has been swamped with objections to power giant
E.ON.UK's planning application.
Property expert Simon Fairclough, from the
Edinburgh Solicitors Property Centre, said: "Wind farms are an interesting
concept - as a source of science fiction fantasy - but also undisputedly as an
industrial facility.
"Agreeing to build a wind farm within sight
or hearing of a residence will have an impact on the likely resale value of the
property. Would the siting of a wind farm be likely to enhance the value? The
answer is no."
---
Villages split over turbines
RESIDENTS are divided over whether plans for
a controversial wind farm should go ahead.
Renewable Energy Systems Ltd wants to put 13
wind turbines 120 metres high on land at Wadlow Farm between Balsham and West
Wratting, but has yet to submit an official planning application.
Jim Paice, MP for Cambridgeshire South East,
has surveyed 2,500 homes and found 43 per cent of the 500 residents who
responded are in favour of the idea while 53 per cent are against. Four per cent
were undecided.
Just 18 per cent of West Wratting residents
support the idea compared to 51 per cent from Balsham.
Those opposed are worried about how the
scheme will look, noise and the potential distraction to drivers on the A11,
while some people in favour said they could change their mind if it damaged
wildlife.
Mr Paice said: "Given the strong views held
on this controversial proposal it was important to let local residents have
their say and I am delighted that so many people took part. The results will be
passed on to South Cambridgeshire District Council and must be taken into
account by the planning authorities.
"It is imperative that the final decision
balances the need for more renewable energy with the interests of local people
and the local environment."
Mr Paice carried out the survey with South
Cambridgeshire Coun Richard Barrett, who represents Balsham and West Wratting,
and resident Vicky Ford, of High Street, Balsham.
She said: "Of those who support the wind
farm a number of people wrote that the Government should focus urgently on all
forms of renewable energy.
"Of those who oppose the wind farm, many
said that the visual impact was a major concern and point out that this is a
particularly beautiful area of unspoilt countryside. This windfarm is much
larger than any nearby - the turbine heights are far greater than those in March
or Swaffham. A number of people said that they thought this development was
simply too large and they thought some of these turbines are too close to the
villages.
"If the wind farm is built then it is
important that these issues are addressed."
17 March 2006
---
he Sunday Times March 19,
2006
Lottery throws £10m to the wind
Mark
Macaskill and John Elliott
THE government has been accused of raiding £10m of
lottery money intended for good causes to subsidise the construction of a wind
farm by a foreign energy company.
The grant to a subsidiary of Elsam, a Danish
energy giant that is being taken over by the Danish state, will help to pay for
a wind farm four miles offshore in Liverpool Bay.
This weekend the manager of the project
admitted it would have gone ahead with or without the lottery cash. "The project
in itself is viable without the grant," said Adrian Maddocks. "I think it was
just pot luck."
However, Phil Ruffles, an expert on energy
supply and a former vice-president of the Royal Academy of Engineering, said:
"I’m not sure lottery money was ever intended to subsidise electrical supply. It
sounds like a bit of a cheat."
The £10m is part of £50m awarded by the
lottery to renewable energy schemes. It has granted £18m to the British
subsidiary of the German firm E.ON to construct a biomass-fuelled power station
in Lockerbie.
The Buccleuch Group, a company owned by the
Duke of Buccleuch, one of Britain’s largest landowners, has been awarded a
lottery grant of £572,000 to help pay for "biomass heat clusters" — furnaces
burning waste from the duke’s estates.
Construction of the offshore wind farm is to
begin later this year on what is known as the Burbo Bank. The project will
eventually see the erection of 25 wind turbines, each about 425ft high. The cost
is expected to be around £120m and the scheme will provide power for about
70,000 homes on Merseyside.The lottery grant of £10.4m was awarded to SeaScape
Energy, which is owned by Elsam. Last week Elsam announced profits after tax of
more than £130m on a turnover of £1.1 billion.
Opposition politicians, environmentalists
and campaigners against wind farms have all rounded on the decision to award the
cash. Ruffles said wind farms, like other renewable energy sources, already
received significant subsidies from the taxpayer.
Hugo Swire, the Tory shadow secretary for
culture, media and sport, said: "We all recognise the need to tackle global
warming, but what justification can there be for spending national lottery money
on a Danish-owned wind farm?"
A spokesman for the Big Lottery Fund said
the Burbo project would also have a "positive social impact" by creating jobs in
the Liverpool area.