REPORT OF THE
COMMITTEE OF INQUIRY ON
Foot-and-Mouth Disease
1968
PART TWO
Presented to Parliament by the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food
By Command of Her Majesty
December 1969
LONDON
HER MAJESTY’S STATIONERY OFFICE
12s. 6d. [62=p] net
Cmnd. 4225
COMMITTEE OF INQUIRY ON
FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE
MINUTE OF APPOINTMENT
I hereby appoint
The Duke of Northumberland, K.G.,T.D., J.P.
A. Cripps, Esq., D.S.O., T.D., Q.C.
Professor D. G. Evans, D.Sc., Ph.D., F.C.Path., F.R.S.
C. H. Plumb, Esq.
Sir Edward Thompson, M.B.E., T.D.
Professor D. Walker, M.A.
Professor Sir William L. Weipers, B.Sc., F.R.C.V.S., D.V.S.M.,
F.R.S.E
to be a Committee to review the policy and arrangements for dealing with foot-and-mouth disease in Great Britain and to make recommendations.
I further appoint the Duke of Northumberland to be Chairman of the
Committee and Mr. J. N. Jotcham to be Secretary, and Mrs. M. D. White to
be Assistant Secretary of the Committee.
(Sgd.) FREDERICK PEART
Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food.
28th February, 1968.
In addition to the above I hereby appoint
E. L. Thomas, Esq., L.L.B., J.P.
to be an additional member of the Committee.
(Sgd.) CLEDWYN HUGHES
Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food.
22nd April, 1968.
Professor D. G. Evans was awarded the C.B.E. in the Birthday Honours List, 1969.
2
PART II OF THE REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE OF
INQUIRY ON FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE
To the Rt. Hon. CLEDWYN HUGHES, M.P.
Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food.
SIR,
We were appointed on 28th February, 1968:>
“to review the policy and arrangements for dealing with foot-and-mouth disease in Great Britain and to make recommendations”.
On 7th March, 1969 we presented Part I of our Report (Cmnd. 3999). This dealt with aspects of our inquiry to which we felt it was right to give priority namely, the ways by which the risk of the introduction of foot-and-mouth disease virus into Great Britain, and the risk of future epidemics, might be reduced. The Committee welcomed your general acceptance of their recommendations and your subsequent announcement in regard to changes in import policy with effect from 1st October, 1969 which have established the conditions which all but one member of the Committee (Anthony Cripps, Q.C.) considered necessary for the adoption of a policy which relies on the slaughter policy. The decision to report in two stages arose from our desire to make our main recommendations on policy matters as soon as possible and not to delay until we could complete a lengthy examination of matters of detailed procedure if outbreaks occur. We now submit Part II of our Report. This reviews the arrangements for controlling outbreaks of foot-and-mouth disease in Great Britain. It deals with such matters as organisation, administration, procedures relating to slaughter and disposal of carcases, sanitary controls and valuation. Adequate arrangements in relation to these are an essential component of a slaughter policy if the spread of disease from a primary introduction is to be controlled. The 1967/1968 epidemic brought to light weaknesses in the existing provisions designed to control the spread of foot-and-mouth disease. Your Department, rightly in our view, introduced many modifications during the course of the epidemic either by temporary Order or on a voluntary basis, and considered that some of these should be included permanently in control Orders as soon as possible since they would be of great immediate importance in the event of another epidemic. The Committee agreed that important amendments should not await the completion of this Report and that some changes should be made without delay; these were introduced on 20th October, 1969. The scope of the amending Orders is given in Appendix VII; generally, these changes had our support but some of them may require further amendment if the relevant recommendations in this Report are accepted. Our recommendations include a number of proposals which we are aware your Department are considering as a result of the experience gained during the course of the 1967/1968 epidemic.
Since we submitted the first part of our Report we have held a further nineteen meetings in this country. We have revisited Chester in order to talk to farmers from the surrounding counties, particularly those who actually experienced foot-and-mouth disease on their farms during the 1967/1968 epidemic as well
3
as others who were involved. Some of us have visited divisional veterinary offices of your Department to discuss the arrangements for controlling the disease in the field with those directly responsible. We also visited the Animal Health Division of the Ministry at Tolworth, and the Press and Broadcasting Branch in London.
Many of the witnesses listed in Part I of our Report submitted evidence which was relevant to both Part I and to Part II. We would like to thank them again for the trouble they have taken in providing us with evidence and for answering our questions, and to extend our appreciation to those who have given us evidence since the completion of the first part of our Report. Appendix I lists all those persons and bodies who have given us evidence, whether for Part I or for Part II.
We also record our appreciation of the full assistance we received from officials of your Ministry, not only in the detailed preparation of very numerous papers for our consideration but also in the lengthy discussions we have had with them. We were impressed by their objective approach and constructive contributions throughout the inquiry. The expert knowledge and experience of foot-and-mouth disease problems of Mr. Carnochan and Mr. Beynon, who led the Ministry team and who attended all these discussions, were invaluable to our deliberations.
Finally we express our gratitude to our Secretary Mr. Jotcham, and our Assistant Secretary Mrs. White, and to the members of our secretariat for the speed and efficiency with which they have dealt with our work. Mr. Jotcham and Mrs. White have worked with us over long hours and on a number of occasions over weekends, and we are grateful to them for their unfailing co-operation, for their efficient service at all times, and for the care and attention they devoted to us on our visits overseas.
A summary of our conclusions and recommendations is given in Chapter V.
![]()
Note: The estimated cost of preparing and publishing Parts I and II of this Report is £18,637 of which £2,184 represents the estimated cost of printing and publication.
4
PART II OF THE REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE OF
INQUIRY ON FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE
CONTENTS
Chapter
I
Paragraphs
1 - 8
II
GENERAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR CONTROLLING OUTBREAKS OF
FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE IN GREAT BRITAIN BEFORE THE
9 - 32
III
REVIEW OF ARRANGEMENTS AND RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS
33
34 – 36
37 – 46
47
(d) Infected Areas
48 – 50
51 – 80
(iii) Housing of livestock
81
(iv) Restocking
82
83 – 84
85
(vii) Inspection of livestock
86
87
(e) Controlled Areas
88 – 90
91 – 95
96 – 97
98
99 – 106
107 – 108
(i) Milk
109 – 115
116 – 123
124 – 130
(l) Disinfection
131 – 142
143
144 – 163
(ii) Consequential loss
164 – 165
(iii) Taxation
166 – 167
(iv) Insurance
168 – 169
170
171 – 186
5
CONTENTS > continued
Chapter Paragraphs
187 - 198
(p) Swill
199 – 204
(q) Legislation
205 – 208
IV
209 – 214
V
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
215 – 221
(b) Summary
222
VI
POSTSCRIPT TO PART I OF THE COMMITTEE’S REPORT
(a) General
223
224 – 227
228 – 230
(d) Carrier state
231
(e) New vaccines
232
(f) Other problems
233 – 234
6
TABLES
page
I
Primary outbreaks of foot-and-mouth disease from 1954 to
10
II
16 - 17
III
Period between confirmation of foot-and-mouth disease and
24