Warmwell "Front Page" Archive 2001 - 2004
Jan 23 2004 ~ Zimbabwe faces new FMD devastation - its appeals have led only to "paltry doses of vaccines"
The new article on FMD eradication from Israel pleads that "Common, co-ordinated epidemiological studies leading to a common control policy should be sought and supported by the international community" see below - Zimbabwe, very much in need of international support for its cattle herd, is now looking hopefully towards China. Zimbabwe faces new FMD devastation because, as the
Harare Financial Gazette reports, "the government failed to source enough foreign currency to buy the vaccines necessary to eradicate the disease."
"Zimbabwe needs about one million doses of vaccines a month to completely wipe out the disease which threatens to reduce the country's cattle herd.
.....
Zimbabwe has partially managed to contain the disease through paltry doses of vaccines sourced through appeals from international donor organisations such as the Food and Agriculture Organisation, European Union and the Southern Africa Development Community.
.....
The national herd is said to have dwindled from 5.1 million in 1998 to 250 000 this year due to drought, FMD, an acute shortage of stockfeed and destocking by most farmers because of the chaotic land reforms.
...
Zimbabwe had an annual export quota of 9 100 tonnes of beef to the EU which used to earn the country about US$2 billion annually.
The government is said to be trying to seal a deal with China to establish a FMD vaccination production plant facility locally and save the country billions in foreign currency."
Jan 23 ~ Mr Owen Paterson has tabled a series of Commons questions about DEFRA non-payment
Shropshire Star MP hits out on cash owed for disease work
".... Mr Paterson has tabled a series of Commons questions to Environment Secretary Margaret Beckett asking why many payments have been delayed. He has also asked whether compensation payments to farmers who had to slaughter animals during the epidemic also remained outstanding. Ministers have said that delays have occurred while the Government checks the validity of claims and to ensure that there was no unwarranted spending of taxpayers' money.
But Mr Paterson said that the National Audit Office had reported that, out of 1,200 cases investigated, only 18 involved allegations of fraud, and six of these had been dismissed.
The shadow agriculture minister said: "I understand the Government has spent £20 million investigating these claims. "The delays make a mockery of the Government's threat to bring in legislation on late payment of bills." ...."
Jan 20 - 23 ~ "Questions should be asked about research which relies so heavily on data produced by the industry itself"
The Scotsman reports on the DEFRA funded research study into stocking and density levels branded by the RSPCA as "absolute nonsense' The RSPCA says that not only are the study’s conclusions questionable, but many of the 2.7 million broiler chickens used suffered in the research. The study analysed survival rates of birds stocked up to 46kg per square metre when DEFRA's own recommended limit, even for unfortunate battery hens, is 34kg per square metre..
"...Caroline Le Sueur, RSPCA senior scientific officer, criticised Defra ....
"Birds crammed in at these high levels are so tightly packed it is almost impossible for them to cool down. In the scorching summer of 2003 we know that millions of broilers died from heat stress - at lower stocking levels the figure could have been much less.
The government must now acknowledge the question marks placed against this study. It has not been scientifically presented for debate in the usual journals, it has serious omissions such as bypassing behavioural issues and is not based on data provided by independent researchers. We see it not only as a useless fudge but also a cruel waste of time and money. Questions should be asked about research which relies so heavily on data produced by the industry itself...."
Jan 20 - 23 ~ Hill farms teetering on the breadline
Guardian "Carol Evans, of the Peak District Rural Deprivation Forum, said: "It is shameful that many of Britain's food producers are living on the breadline, earning far less than the minimum wage. A myth still persists that all farmers are rich and greedy - this report makes clear that nothing could be further from the truth."
See also Independent "....People may have forgotten about foot and mouth but we're still dealing with the consequences.
We are also penalised as farmers in the hills. It rains a lot, the weather is worse and the soil is not as deep so we are limited to livestock and our options are limited.
I do benefit from the subsidies system but I do not like it at all. I don't like the hand-out effect it is having on the farming.
At the moment, it's not a level playing field. We do not have the options to be as flexible as other farms and we are suffering because of that."
Jan 20 - 23 ~ "Common, co-ordinated epidemiological studies leading to a common control policy should be sought and supported by the international community."
A new article (available from the Israeli Embassy in London) Foot and Mouth Disease: The Israeli Approach should be of interest in the UK: "....The Israeli Veterinary Services and Animal Health (VSAH) have the legal powers, the infrastructure and the personnel to carry out the necessary measures in order to prevent, control and eradicate outbreaks of FMD...."
The article concludes with this paragraph about veterinary cooperation and the now, much needed co-ordination of expertise and policy by the whole international community :
"Control measures hopefully leading to eradication of FMD from the Middle East are of the utmost importance for the regional countries and, not to a lesser extent, to the adjacent regions - foremost (unvaccinated) Europe. This goal might have a (remote) chance only if and when regional co-operation is implemented. Common, co-ordinated epidemiological studies leading to a common control policy should be sought and supported by the international community. Some promising steps have been already made." (for details, click here).
Jan 20 - 23 ~ an "unarguable case" for a move away from intensive chemical farming methods.
A crop-sprayer has, at present, a legal right repeatedly to spray mixtures of poisonous chemicals right up to the open window of any occupied premises. Georgina Downs, a singer who has suffered permanent health damage from the crop spraying of fields next to her family's home in Sussex,
has produced a video to show the Government the reality of exactly what is happening in the countryside from the continued use of pesticides. The long-term consequences and devastating effects of hazardous chemicals on people living in rural areas will be featured on the ITV programme "That’s Esther" on Sunday January 25th at 12.30pm
Ms. Downs states that the current regulations are totally obstructive and make it almost impossible to prove causation. Currently members of the public are not entitled to access the information on the chemicals they are exposed to and nor can their doctors. Such information obtained by HSE inspectors "can only be disclosed with the consent of the person who provided it"...
Read More
Jan 20 - 23 ~ Civil Contingencies Bill will allow sweeping new powers
Scotsman
"....The responses to disasters and emergencies such as the King's Cross fire, the foot-and-mouth outbreak, recent rail crashes and the fuel crisis had also proved the need for fresh legislation in that area." Cabinet Minister Douglas Alexander on the second reading of the Civil Contingencies Bill yesterday.
Readers of this website know that the powers the government took during the foot and mouth crisis in 2001 were sweeping and bloody and inflexible. That they were also not covered by existing legislation (and therefore illegal) has never been satisfactorily denied. As Mr Morley admitted to the EFRA Select Committee on 6 November 2001 "At the present time we do not have powers for a fire break cull.."
As the MEP Giles Chichester says below, the government "still has plenty to answer for over foot and mouth disease."
One "lesson learned" by this government seems to be to ensure that they must give themselves the power to override existing safeguards to freedom should any "emergency" (see new definition) arise. See Democracy page
Jan 20 ~ Defra's Horse Passport Pantomime
From equiworld.net Article Defra's Horse Passport Pantomime
"Oh no, you don't need a vet to apply for a horse passport" said DEFRA.
"Oh yes you do" DEFRA now says
The Country Land and Business Association has expressed surprise at DEFRA'S about turn on horse passport applications which has thrown horse owners and the equine industry into a state of confusion.
Contrary to advice given to its Passport Issuing Organisations, DEFRA has now announced that owners will no longer be allowed to complete the silhouette section of the horse's passport application by themselves after 31 January unless the horse is microchipped. Instead the silhouette must be completed by either a veterinary surgeon or a person authorised by the passport-issuing organisation (PIO)....the advice being given on the internet by the various passport issuing organisations is conflicting and now out of date. Not only are we having to pay more for the privilege of keeping Europe happy, but organisations like the CLA are yet again having to use their own resources to communicate Government policy to the public."
Read in full
Jan 19 ~ "I am pleased to know that the Commission is keeping up the pressure on the Government, which still has plenty to answer for over foot and mouth disease." Giles Chichester MEP
The Government has been given a final written warning by the European Commission over a failure to carry out an environmental impact assessment (EIA) of the controversial Ash Moor mass burial site
Western Morning News
".....Failure to respond to the warning could result in the Government being brought before the European Court of Justice.
...... the Government has been told that the European Commission is not satisfied that UK legislation on EIAs adequately covers development on land owned by the state, which UK authorities have claimed was exempt from planning regulations.
...
Leading STAMP member Joe Skinner said: "....We started right at the beginning, telling them they were doing it wrong, and they would not listen to a word we said. If chickens are coming home to roost for the Government I am delighted."............
....
South West MEP Giles Chichester said: "The Ash Moor Pit is a monumental lesson in inefficiency and waste. All that money was put into it in the first place and now a huge amount is having to be spent to restore the site. I am pleased to know that the Commission is keeping up the pressure on the Government, which still has plenty to answer for over foot and mouth disease."
Jan 16 - 19 ~ the courts have finally called Defra's bluff on a campaign of intimidation.... Of 1200 cases investigated, the National Audit Office last year found that only 18 involved fraud, non proven and most now abandoned.
Sunday Telegraph Booker's Notebook
" ... Terrified that it may lose£1 billion due to Britain from Brussels,
Defra has tried to appease the European Commission by finding every excuse
not to hand ..."
"... the UK government may well lose the £1 billion it wishes to claim from Brussels anyway.
......
Hundreds of contractors still have claims outstanding
...
....the real disgrace of this affair is that, despite Defra's shameless efforts to convince Brussels that it has been looking after taxpayers' interests, the European Commission has not yet shown any sign of being impressed. It has capped the UK's right to claim repayment at a mere £250 million, leaving £1 billion outstanding - a sum it seems the UK government may now never be in a position to claim. " Read in full
Jan 16 - 19 ~ "Defra's tactics have been comprehensively ruled as illegal."
Private Eye this week. Muckspreader column: "A landslide defeat for Defra in the high court has blown wide open one of the biggest scandals remaining from the 2001 foot and mouth debacle: the ministry's astonishing refusal to pay hundreds of contractors £100 million still owing ...
...
...Commission officials began to hint that they were not happy with the way Maff had been throwing money around. Farmers had been paid too much in compensation (since much of the 'cull' had been illegal, this was thought necessary to buy off their protests). Too much had been spent in every direction.
In 2002 and 2003 it gradually became clear that Defra was finding any excuse not to pay the money it owed to hundreds of contractors....
Invoices for £500,000 and other documents which the firm supplied to Defra were mysteriously 'lost'. Quibbles were raised about the tiniest details of spending. ...
... when one MP raised the Furse case. the minister Alun Michael continued to stonewall....." Read in full
See also warmwell's front page from last November which goes a long way to explain why DEFRA have been so much at pains to try to find any means of lowering the bill. Nov 11 - 18 2003 -
- The European Court of Auditors is believed to be deeply concerned by FMD's spiralling costs and by the controversial contiguous cull policy
".... These are huge sums of money, which the Chancellor was expecting and if they are not paid there will be a shortfall somewhere. ..."
Jan 16- 19 ~ Frustrated NFU dairy farmer will make a dramatic protest on Monday
....a protest that ordinary farmer members do not have the right to choose their own leader.
"...A once proud Union is now in sad decline, losing millions of pounds every year and in danger of becoming bankrupt - financially and morally,"
The NFU Council has been described by one of its members as: "Eighty-nine decrepit, unimaginative, super-annuated, self-important male ex-farmers and one woman sitting round a table playing the game called Buggin's Turn. The rules are simple; all office-holders move slowly up the totem pole and - provided they don't say anything which will upset anyone - they take their turn near the top"
Read more on Monday( temporarily embargoed - cannot be read until Monday)
80% of respondents to a FARMERS WEEKLY Interactive
poll believe the NFU should introduce a policy of one member, one vote to
elect the president and key officeholders.
Jan 16 - 19 ~ "DEFRA has abandoned its proposals to impose a 150km distance limit on the
movement of livestock
through markets in the aftermath of the 2001 foot
and mouth ...DEFRA stated that Ministers had concluded the benefits of introducing a distance limit are too small given the wider impact. But they reserved the right to revisit the issue should circumstances change." News Wales
Jan 16 ~ “It's frightening that this is the way they are treating people who did their best to help them beat the outbreak. It's cynical and dishonourable."
News and Star, Cumbria "Cumbria County Council-owned Cumbria Waste Management (CWM), which buried thousands of carcasses in its landfill sites, exclusively revealed to the News & Star that it is still owed £6 million for the work it carried out three years ago.
.... Mike Bareham, CWM's managing director, said: “It's frightening that this is the way they are treating people who did their best to help them beat the outbreak. It's cynical and dishonourable. We are going to fight this claim as hard as we did to rid this county of foot and mouth disease.
.....We opened up our offices to Defra and did everything we could to help. We are now disillusioned with the Government.”
It is not known exactly how much money is owed to Cumbrian businesses but the Forum of Private Business (FPB), which is leading the campaign to settle payments for rural firms, has revealed that it runs into many millions...."
Jan 15 ~"The reason we have tended to go in the direction of wind power is the (EU) subsidy..."
Thousands of square miles of countryside would be dominated by wind generators, up to 400 ft high....
"Lord Sainsbury has told peers that the Government's target for a massive expansion of renewable energy will be driven mainly by new windfarms, despite calls for greater investment in tidal power. ...
Lord Hooson also questioned the Government's reliance on wind power, saying that ministers "should give greater priority to harnessing tidal power, rather than wind power". WMN
See also warmwell page on windfarms
Jan 14 2004 ~ "We are being asked to believe that a department which is regarded as being notoriously dysfunctional is now being uncharacteristically prudent."
A letter in today's Telegraph from Andrew George, MP, Liberal Democrat Food and Rural Affairs spokesman
Re: Foot the bill and cough up
Date: 14 January 2004
Sir - Of course the Government should root out fraudulent claims made in respect of the foot and mouth outbreak two years ago, but many desperate debtors believe it is simply playing for time.According to the reckoning of the Department of Food and Rural Affairs, £800 million of the £1.3 billion arising from the claims could be fraudulent. If so, the Government is making a substantial criticism of farmers affected and of the contractors who helped Defra out of a hole.We are being asked to believe that a department which is regarded as being notoriously dysfunctional is now being uncharacteristically prudent.
From:Andrew George, MP, Liberal Democrat Food and Rural Affairs spokesman, London SW1
Jan 13 2004~ "...Seven months after the culling of our healthy animals, Fred Landeg sent us a seven page letter telling us that our farm was still highly infectious"
Warmwell has recently publicised articles from the Western Morning News describing the human cost behind the cases of alleged fraud brought by DEFRA in the course of its £19.81 million investigations (in one case spending hours disputing a bill for just £1.88...). This email received from Mrs D Phillips is hard to read without wondering if such ignorance, bullying and inconsistency could really have happened. It did.
".
......
Our farm was contiguous. We did not have FMD. 15 other farms contiguous to the IP ( which was never confirmed by a blood test), were left un-culled and obviously were not cleansed.
Because I refused to allow the cleansing to be carried out... I withstood twelve months of living under first an illegal Form A, then the far more severe Form 37B.
....
Seven months after the culling of our healthy animals, Fred Landeg sent us a seven page letter telling us that our farm was still highly infectious and that we would have to remain on a Form A for a further five months, despite the fact that the other 15 contiguous farms had never been culled. ....
MAFF did however, cleanse a contiguous pig farm, where they culled 2800 pigs - at a cost of approximately £420,000 to the tax payer.
Jan Kelly chose to leave 200 sows plus 200 suckler cows un-culled on the same farm. She then authorised ten weeks of cleansing to be carried out on one set of buildings, then moved the sows and cattle from the uncleansed buildings into the clean ones, and proceeded to clean the old buildings, allowing these so-called "highly infectious contiguous cattle and pigs" to transfer disease from the dirty buildings, straight into the newly cleansed ones.
...."
Read in full
Jan 12/13 2004 ~ "There has been no instance of vaccinated carriers of the virus
being the cause of the introduction or recurrence of FMD."
(Vaccination alone does not, of course, produce carriers in healthy animals)
Y. Leforban How predictable were the outbreaks of foot and
mouth disease in Europe in 2001 and is
vaccination the answer?
"
...Effective vaccines that are capable of inducing good immunity
and protection within approximately one week are available
world-wide.....There is no real proof in the field of the danger of vaccinated
carriers and the use of differential serological tests would
reduce this hypothetical risk further. In comparison, when the
slaughter method is used, there is also a risk of overlooking
animals that are affected sub-clinically and which could also
become carriers."
This pdf file (new window) is now available on line in the series Foot and mouth disease: facing the new dilemmas edited by Gavin Thomson (OIE)
Jan 12/13 ~ Foot and mouth disease: facing the new dilemmas
with Introduction by Gavin Thomson is now available online (summaries and pdf files)
"...Questioning the traditional approaches to the control/eradication of the disease and especially the justification for 'stamping-out' which had been documented in all its horror by the media in the United Kingdom was the popular topic. This concern was so intense that many drawn into the debate had little knowledge of the nature of FMD or of the behaviour of the disease and there was an understandable search for a readily available and authoritative source of such information. This special edition is primarily an attempt to respond to this need and provide an up-to-date source of information for both animal health specialists and others seeking a compendium of information on the subject....
...sections include both papers intended to provide basic information as well as papers covering 'topical' problems such as vaccination and its effects on international trade, 'carriers' and their role in the epidemiology of the disease and the environmental implications of 'stamping-out'. Some opinions differ from the official position of the OIE as exemplified by the present edition of the International Animal Health Code but this is considered healthy if we are to improve management of this disease internationally. ..."
The Index and overview is available at http://www.oie.int/eng/publicat/rt/A_rt21_3.htm
Jan 12 2004 ~"the paradigm 'free of FMD without
vaccination' is not synonymous with 'risk free'"
"Unlike animals which are carriers of foot and mouth disease (FMD), sub-clinically
infected animals may be highly contagious....."
Animals in
which FMDV persists in the oesophageal-pharyngeal region for
more than four weeks after infection are referred to as "carriers"
Unapparent foot and mouth disease infection (sub-clinical infections and carriers): implications for control by P. Sutmoller & R. Casas Olascoaga
Rev. sci. tech. Off. int. Epiz., 2002, 21 (3), 519-529 ".....A few historical reports and some recent observations in southern Africa indicate the possibility of dissemination of FMD by bovine carriers into herds of susceptible cattle. These reports have greatly influenced FMD trade policies and thus, FMD control and eradication strategies. However, other field evidence does not support this claim and several controlled experiments were unable to show that carriers are able to initiate disease. .. In the opinion of the authors, the introduction of FMD into
previously FMD-free zones was caused by the movement of
clinically or sub-clinically infected animals and not by bovine
carriers...
....
.When millions of cattle were
systematically vaccinated with good quality vaccines, FMD disappeared in spite
of a large sentinel population in the form of calves and unvaccinated sheep and
pigs. A low number of carriers most likely persisted, but they did not hamper the
eradication of the disease.
Vaccination policies and trade regulation must be based on risk assessments
taking these factors into consideration..."
Sir James Scudamore's concern about detecting "carrier animals" can be read below.
Jan 12 2004 ~ James Scudamore refers to "supposedly effective vaccines"
Veterinary Journal (January) FMD - differentiating vaccinated from infected animals (new window)
".... revealed changes in the public's attitudes to mass slaughter of livestock, particularly those not obviously affected by the disease. The effect has been to question the morality and appropriateness of pursuing a stamping out policy when supposedly effective vaccines are available and where tests to detect antibodies to non-structural proteins (NSP) to the FMD virus can be used to indicate whether a vaccinated animal has been exposed to the virus or may be acting as a carrier. ..
..Modern PCR techniques to detect viral RNA may facilitate rapid screening of large numbers of samples
but there is still no entirely reliable method of detecting
carrier animals and those techniques that exist are
highly labour intensive and expensive.... if NSP tests are to be used as a key component of an exit strategy
following an outbreak where a policy of "vaccination to-
live" had been employed, more research is needed.
Clavijo, Wright and Kitching's review provides a comprehensive
summary of the key areas needing to be addressed."
Clavijo, Wright and Kitching (The Veterinary Journal 167 (2004) 9 - 22) (new window) appear reasonably optimistic, however. Extract "Considerable effort and attention is now being directed toward the development of new methods and techniques for the rapid and accurate detection of anti-NSP antibodies, harmonization and standardization of current diagnostic techniques, as well as the production of defined reagents."
Jan 12 2004 ~ Scrapie "the compulsory EU scheme takes
effect in April 2005. Implementing
the EU schemes will be a major
task..."
See pdf file (new window) The National Scrapie Plan: progress to date
and future developments
by Michael Dawson
".....There has been understandable
concern expressed by members of
some breeds that the NSP selection
requirements will result in the
loss of desirable traits and blood
lines, particularly in the hill breeds.
Though some research is underway
and further work is proposed,
it will be some time before results
are available. In this respect, it is
encouraging to note that the
impending EU programmes allow
for review if serious negative
effects become evident in individual
breeds."
"Encouraging" possibly, but whether any of this is necessary in the first place is still in doubt in the minds of many.
Jan 12 2004 ~ "growing evidence to suggest
organic farming has improved animal
welfare.."
Animal Health and Welfare in Organic
Livestock Production(pdf) by
Malla Hovi Extract"... mainly by banning
some of the most intensive livestock
production practices (e.g. all
types of battery cages, early
weaning of piglets, tethering of
ruminants etc.)
...A recent UK study of
organic pig production found very
few health problems....
In the UK, outdoor breeding units
have been relatively easy to convert
to organic production, where
farm size and crop rotations have
allowed adequate space.... Tethering,
decks and entirely slatted floors
are forbidden. The minimum
weaning age for piglets is 40 days
....
the later
weaning age in organic pig production
is likely to reduce nutritional
challenges in this period, as
the piglets' digestive tract is more
mature than in early weaning systems.
A recent UK study of
organic pig production found very
few health problems..."
Jan 10 2004~ Munich's Tageszeitung downplays risk of BSE after flaws in testing are reported
Munich's Tageszeitung comments on reports of slipshod testing for BSE See email
"German authorities have said attempts to save money may have been the reason for lapses in mandatory testing of beef for the disease last year.
A comparison of the number of slaughtered cattle and of tests for BSE showed meat from more than 500 animals may have reached consumers without first having been tested.
The paper wrote that several conclusions can be drawn from the findings:
first, that there is no such thing as 100 percent safety;
secondly, the controls are at least effective in that they uncovered the lapses;
and third, there is no reason to panic, for in an overwhelming 99.95 percent of cases, tests were carried out properly, meaning that the risk of being run over by a car is in Germany 1,000 times higher than being infected by BSE."
Again, the assumption is made that eating meat from a cow with BSE could "infect" humans, a claim that has never been proved, Prof Collinge's comments notwithstanding. It seems that authorities downplay the BSE risk only when they have been found negligent in respect of their own rules.
Jan 10 ~ emergency vaccination would be considered...part of the control strategy.....where measures additional to culling.... were needed.
Hansard (new window) 6th Jan
Miss McIntosh: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if she will introduce vaccination as a means of preventing the spread of foot and mouth disease as part of the Foot and Mouth Contingency Plan. [144177]
Mr. Bradshaw: Prophylactic vaccination remains prohibited under the new EU Directive 2003/85 on the control of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD). However, the Directive does give greater prominence to the potential use of emergency vaccination in the event of an outbreak.
The Government's response to the independent inquiries into the 2001 FMD outbreak acknowledged that emergency vaccination would be considered as part of the control strategy from the start of any future outbreak of FMD, where measures additional to culling of susceptible animals on infected premises and dangerous contacts were needed. The latest version of Defra's FMD Contingency Plan includes details on the arrangements that are in place to allow for emergency vaccination in a future outbreak.
Mr Bradshaw chose not to quote the part of the Directive that says, "(1) ...the Community is also a Community of
values, and its policies to combat animal diseases must not be based purely on commercial
interests but must also take genuine account of ethical principles
...(24) ....Community rules and the ensuing
practices have not taken sufficient account of the possibility offered by the use of emergency
vaccination and subsequent tests to detect infected animals in a vaccinated population. Too
much importance was attached to the trade-policy aspects, with the result that protective
vaccination was not carried out even when it had been authorised." (See Directive pdf.)
Jan 10 2004 ~ DEFRA "does not believe there are any valid unpaid and outstanding invoices, submitted by businesses to the Department, for work undertaken in connection with the foot and mouth outbreak. "
Mr Bradshaw - as reported by Hansard. Read in full
Mr Bradshaw must temporarily have forgotten such firms as Luke Furse Earth Moving Ltd, of Devon.
It is now 1,000 days since their invoice was submitted to DEFRA but, almost three years on from the outbreak, Defra is still withholding payment of £1.2 million.
According to the Western Morning News "Luke Furse, who founded the respected family firm 25 years ago, said he had been stunned when Defra began to refuse payment. He said the oldest unpaid invoice was now 1,000 days overdue.
Mr Furse said that although all payments had been agreed at the time his firm had been subjected to a barrage of questions and repeated audits as Government accountants attempted to chip away at the bill. Now the firm has been told that the Government has "lost" invoices totalling almost £500,000..."
Jan 10 2004 ~ Yet another alleged "fraud" case and its effect on the family concerned.
WMN on yet another supposed "fraud" case ".... Mr Haste was due to appear at Exeter Crown Court next Monday but Defra dramatically dropped the charges. He says he will press for full compensation from Defra. "I will go all the way to the House of Lords if I have to."..."It was a very frightening time for myself and my family. I felt betrayed because Defra had told me to make a claim in the first place. At that time I did not know whether I was going to go to prison, my wife was a nervous wreck and my son, who also runs the farm with me, was cracking up."
Yet another reminder, three years later, of what
John Piper, writing in the Yorkshire Post
described: "The foot-and-mouth crisis ... a lethal cocktail of folly, self-interest, Government ineptitude and spinelessness, waste and wanton cruelty, both to human beings and animals.
In short, a disgrace of huge magnitude. "
Jan 9 2004 ~ "put through hell"
The Western Morning News yesterday: "....Westcountry farmer Michael Pedrick, who was cleared of trying to cheat MAFF out of nearly £17,000 following the foot and mouth crisis, says his life was made hell by Government officials.
Mr Pedrick's solicitors, Taunton-based Clarke Willmott, are lodging a complaint against a Defra official following a bizarre scene after the court case on Tuesday. Mr Pedrick had just been acquitted of attempting to obtain a valuable security by deception from the then Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food (MAFF).
The solicitors allege that a female vet approached the 63-year-old farmer and wagging a finger in his face, told him: "You are a very lucky man to get off."....
.....Defra last night refused to comment on the outstanding money which Mr Pedrick claims is still owed to him or the allegation against a female vet.
A spokesman said: "Any complaint is dealt with thoroughly but internally."
Many of us will remember Sir Humphrey Appleby's complacent smirk "An internal inquiry Minister" . Many, many other livestock owners were put through hell in 2001 by the ignorant bullying of officialdom. What happened to their animals was even more hellish. As for the vets, so many of whom appear to have colluded in cruelty, the RCVS may not choose to condemn the widespread breaking of the veterinary oath - but it will not be forgotten.
Jan 7 2004 ~ "This was a heavy handed prosecution by Defra of a farmer struggling to cope with the foot and mouth epidemic."
Western Morning News (new window) reports the dramatic aquittal of the case of alleged fraud. ( DEFRA has justified its delays (see below) by alleging fraudulant claims.) "....A farmer accused of trying to cheat the Government out of nearly £17,000 during the foot and mouth crisis has been dramatically cleared.
After legal submissions by his counsel at Exeter Crown Court yesterday, Michael Pedrick was found not guilty of attempting to obtain a valuable security by deception from the then Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food (MAFF). Following legal arguments by barrister Adam Vaitilingam in which he said there was no case to answer against Mr Pedrick, Judge Ian McIntosh directed the jury to return a not guilty verdict saying that it would be unsafe to take the matter further.
After the acquittal, Mr Vaitilingam said: "This was a heavy handed prosecution by Defra of a farmer struggling to cope with the foot and mouth epidemic....
Mr Pedrick's solicitors are now lodging a complaint with Defra over an alleged incident which occurred after the case yesterday involving a woman Defra vet. A statement issued by Clarke Willmott Solicitors said: "We were most surprised by the actions of the Defra vet who was a witness in these proceedings. We understand that she gesticulated at Mr Pedrick and was aggressive towards him, stating to him that 'he was a very lucky man' after the case had finished. We do not consider such action to be appropriate and will be submitting a formal complaint on Mr Pedrick's behalf."
....
"
See Mr Pedrick's story
Jan 7 2004 ~ Almost £20 million has been spent investigating suspected fraudulent claims
from contractors for work to deal with the foot-and-mouth disease outbreak
in 2001 ...
... The Scotsman reports.
Hansard had not published written answers by midday. today. Attack is a form of defence well known to this government department. (See above) In early November (Hansard) Andrew George (St Ives) said" I am pleased to hear that the Government are taking a robust line on late payers, but what are they doing about one of the worst of all late payers, namely, themselves?.... "
..and he warned that "Many of those companies are perilously close to bankruptcy, so when will the matter be cleared up?..." We heard on November 12th from Paul Gregory, the
Campaign Advisor to the Forum of Private Business
that the All-Party Small Business Group had already had a meeting in the Commons.
"You will probably know that a frequent response of Defra is to allege fraud (see Nigel Griffiths's answer to the PQ), All the people I have spoken to who have been subjected to this, are innocent.
I'm sure that there are likely to be some persons who have gone into liquidation as a result of non-payment by Defra"
See also an article from the Western Morning News on the DEFRA compensation scandal "Defra officials had subjected contractors to "threats and intimidation", he said. They had also gone through invoices with a fine tooth comb, in one case spending hours disputing a bill for just £1.88..."
January 6 2004 ~ DEFRA refuses to allow pet pig out of the house "this can spread the risk of foot and mouth disease" says official
The Western Morning News (new window) reports a DEFRA official's reasons for refusing a licence - which seem somewhat extraordinary, given that foot and mouth is not a disease passed on by "eating burgers" nor by a healthy pig on a lead in a location where there is no disease. Regulation run mad seems to be the inevitable consequence of government departments desperate not to be held to account.
"A family has been banned from taking their miniature pot-bellied pig for walks because of the potential risk of him contracting and spreading disease.....The couple have a harness and a lead but the inspecting vet has also deemed that Mitchell might be able to eat discarded burgers on a nearby towpath that forms part of his potential walking route...
..A spokesman for Defra explained: "Some people have pet pigs which they treat like dogs.
They keep them in their garden and take them for walks, but this can spread the risk of foot and mouth disease and put other animals at risk. The regulations allow us to keep a record."
See also Muckspreader (Private Eye) on December 3rd 2003
January 6 2004 ~BSE: "We have made a decision to depopulate those bull calves"
" ....The department would not disclose the name of the slaughter plant because of privacy concerns..." Reuters (new window) "We have made a decision to depopulate those bull calves," USDA Chief Veterinarian Ron DeHaven told reporters. "In total, there are approximately 450 animals that will be sacrificed as part of this overall effort."
The herd targeted for depopulation contains a one-month-old bull that was born from the infected cow before it was slaughtered on Dec. 9. DeHaven said there was a "very remote" chance the infected cow spread the brain-wasting disease to its offspring.
USDA also said that since they were unable to pinpoint which animal in the herd is that offspring, all the calves in it were being destroyed.
The 450 cattle will be sent to a slaughtering plant that is not currently in operation. USDA officials said the animals will not enter the food supply or be rendered into animal feed.
The department would not disclose the name of the slaughter plant because of privacy concerns. "
See also warmwell entry for June 17 2003 about the BSE outbreak in Cananda . CFIA spokesman Dr. Claude Lavigne said,
"Everything that we'll ever get is here. There's no more to be gained here.
It's been investigated to death.....the trail has gone cold and we're not going to find a definite source of this
infection.''
In Canada, nearly 3000 healthy cattle were "depopulated" but the Pro-Med moderator wrote: ".. there is no scientific justification for slaughtering herds that were in contact with the infected animal or its offspring. BSE cannot be passed by casual contact."
January 4 2004 ~
"...a disease that is not contagious between
animals nor is contagious between people. "
BSE: A ProMed moderator makes this important assertion and fears ".. some
less-than-humane methods may be employed...." See the
ProMed website (of the International Society for Infectious Diseases)"...
Positive public relation moves often have ripples throughout related
industries that are not necessarily so positive. If an animal is up and can
move, it is considered ambulatory. Therefore, this moderator fears some
less-than-humane methods may be employed to get animals to stand and walk
in order to pass ante-mortem inspection.
On-farm inspections presently have no incentive for producers. American
producers are a proud lot, and intrusion onto their property for on-farm
investigation is likely not going to receive a warm welcome. Of course,
most things have a price; so if the proper financial incentive is in place,
the welcome mat may be forthcoming.
Removal of downer animals from slaughter facilities is likely to create an
underground or secret market in which home slaughter and processing of
animals that are healthy but unable to get up without the use of inhumane
methods will develop, and sampling of these animal will decrease
substantially.
All things considered, it again comes down to how much money the American
public is willing to spend on a disease that is not contagious between
animals nor is contagious between people."
See also transcript of USDA
Technical Briefing and Webcast with U.S. Government Officials
on BSE Situation - January 2, 2004
Jan 4 2004 ~ the decision to grant permission for the monkey laboratory was a forgone conclusion, predetermining the result of the inquiry
"The National Anti-Vivisection Society (NAVS) and Animal Aid have launched a High Court challenge to the decision by First Secretary of State John Prescott to allow a massive primate research laboratory to be built in the Cambridgeshire green belt. The appeal describes Prescott's decision as perverse, unreasonable and unfair."See PRNewswire
Jan 4 2004 ~ Interruption to Warmwell
Apologies. The website may not updated for a few days. Inbox
January 3 2004 ~ Telegraph asserts that humans can contract a form of the disease by eating infected meat
With now no qualification at all, newspapers even with the high standards of the Telegraph are taking as proven fact the link between BSE and vCJD.
"... the Department of Agriculture has focused its tests for bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) on cattle intended for human food, because humans can contract a form of the disease by eating infected meat."
Telegraph
Meanwhile, in the Times, John Collinge appears worried that the assumed link is not being taken seriously enough. His own scientific reputation as director of the Prion Unit at the Medical Research Council will be taken into account by readers.
January 2 2004 ~" BSE 'panic' "
A letter to the Times (new window) January 02, 2004 BSE 'panic' From Mr Ben GarrattSir,
What a relief to find, at last, a journalist (Magnus Linklater, Comment, December 30) expressing the views that farmers have been failing to get across for years, namely that despite the initial panic over BSE, it is, though very nasty, likely to be insignificant when considering human health.
The opposite view, first put to the House of Commons (report, March 21, 1996), ruined many businesses since then and continues to do so. I sent three cows for slaughter last month. All were perfectly healthy, though unable to conceive. Meat from these animals would have been worth £1,800 if sold on our farmers' market stall (chiefly as mince). However, since all were over 30 months old they were destroyed and our compensation from the Government will be about £280 a head. Total loss to the Government, £840.
Total loss to us, nearly £1,000.
The panic continues.
Yours truly,
BEN GARRATT, Burscombe Cliff Farm,Egerton, Ashford, Kent TN27 9BB.
Read Magnus Linklater's article " Scientists must take some of the responsibility. They tend to
play up the risks of an epidemic, lest they be accused of
complacency or, worse, a cover-up; their research grants may depend
on it. Politicians, for their part, have lost the trust of the
public. If they say there is no danger, they are not believed. They
are no longer confident enough of the facts to reassure the public,
so they hope to look more responsible by emphasising the risks
instead. ..."
January 1 2004 ~ New Year Message: The Archbishop of Canterbury
Guardian
"....We should not be surprised perhaps if the assumption grows that the powerful cannot be trusted in a world where too many feel they have nothing to lose ... As the new year starts perhaps one of the biggest questions each of us could ask is: 'Am I making the world a place where trust makes sense?'"
December 30 ~"Apocalypse never"
": from BSE to Sars, we are addicted to paranoia and panic" Magnus Linklater in the
Times (new window)
"....one single case of "mad cow" disease in Washington State threatens the entire US beef industry. ....
.... the evidence of any threat to human beings from "mad cow" disease is so slight that in any rational scientific forum they would be dismissed as non-existent. It rests on the suggestion that variant Creuzfeld-Jakob disease (vCJD) can be transmitted to humans if they eat infected meat.
... Predictions of a vCJD epidemic were dire............ Last year there were just 16 deaths attributed to vCJD in Britain, down yet again on the previous year. What is more, the evidence of any link with BSE has slumped from slight to negligible.
Scientists such as the Australian, Professor Alan Ebringer, and the British farmer turned expert, Mark Purdey, have challenged the theory, first advanced by the Nobel prize-winning American virologist, Stanley Prusiner, who claims that BSE is caused by molecules known as prions which could indeed infect human beings. They argue that the cause lies elsewhere, and say the link with vCJD is unproven.
.....
Why then are the voices of sanity ignored....?" (Read the Times article by Magnus Linklater in full)
Dec 30 2003 ~"Lord Melchett will suggest that the forces behind intensive agriculture have refused to accept the environmental, human health or social damage of the system as a serious problem."
Scotsman - Fordyce Maxwell (new window) "...In the abstract he has submitted for the annual Edinburgh Centre for Rural Research lecture in February, Lord Melchett says that the problems of modern agriculture are: "A combination of massive over-production and dumping on world markets of most commodity crops; continuing rapid losses of jobs in farming, and farmers; public and political concern about taxpayers' subsidies for farmers; dramatic declines in farmland wildlife; belated recognition of the decline in food quality and rapidly increasing concern about diet-related illness, particularly among children."
Similar messages are expected from the Soil Association conference at Heriot- Watt University, Edinburgh on 9 and 10 January with the basic theme being that the urbanisation and industrialisation of agriculture has destroyed public trust in farmers."
December 29 2003 ~
Farming folly
- letter in the Telegraph
Opinion page
Sir
The BSE outbreak in America (News, Dec 26) underlines our Government's folly in running down home agriculture and relying on imports to feed the nation. These imports could be closed overnight through disease or terrorism. Meanwhile, 80,000 people have left farming since 1996, while Defra figures show that 17,200 people quit the industry in the year to June 2003.
Land can be improved or reclaimed if it has not been built on, and machinery can be quickly manufactured, but the skills of dedicated farming folk cannot be replaced. Other countries welcome them. Here, Defra imposes onerous restrictions, the latest being a proposed ban on farm tips that have been used safely for generations.
From:
Edward Hart, Ludlow, Shropshire
Dec 29 2003 ~ Canada angry as American officials claim BSE-infected cow came from Alberta
Independent(new window) "....Dr Evans cautioned against "a premature conclusion that the definitive animal or definitive birthplace has been located". He continued: "What we're suggesting is that we need to verify, using scientific methods such as DNA, that the animal that left Canada with that ear tag is in fact the animal that the US is pursuing at this point." (see also the USDA transcript of the press conference) (new window)
December 28/29 2003 ~ "...cow blood and fat can still be fed to America's calves; and it often is, especially on dairy farms because it will boost milk yield. .." (Sunday Herald)
One does not need to be a scientist to deplore such forced cannibalism in feed lot cattle - but in the absence of factual knowledge about BSE the media are making statements, especially with regard to the assumed causes of BSE being connected to feed, that have little proven scientific basis. How many newspaper readers notice such qualifying words as "may", "could", "might", "theoretically", "scientists believe"?
Officials also revealed that the Holstein was aged six, older than previously thought. This meant it could, theoretically, have become infected by eating contaminated feed of a kind banned in the US and Canada since 1997, after the outbreak of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) in Britain.
(Sunday Telegraph)
The Sunday Herald says, "Scientists believe that BSE, or bovine spongiform encephalopathy, is spread when cattle eat contaminated feed made of other animal parts." but there are, of course, eminent scientists who do not believe this.
"Some leading scientists now say BSE may occur spontaneously in about one cow in a million" (Sunday Herald) Has anyone any further information about these "leading" scientists and their pronouncements?
December 28/29 2003 ~ Alberta and Saskatchewan are known to be TSE hotspot zones
The fully referenced article about Mark Purdey's research into BSE: extract: "... it seems likely that the UK's BSE and vCJD epidemics were caused by the simultaneous exposure ... to a toxic combination of factors" (including) " the widely used copper-chelating organo dithiophosphate (OP) insecticides and the fall out of radioactive metals....."
"American scientists have now traced their mad cow's "birth herd" to Canada" according to today's Sunday Telegraph - presumably anxious to suggest that there was no "infection" in the US itself. We read in today's Sunday Herald of "North America's first case of the brain-wasting disease" being the single cow in Alberta that brought about Canada's own multi-billion dollar crisis in May 2003 - as if CWD was unknown in North America. TSEs may well have a common cause. The problem is that the complexity of scientific challenges to the orthodoxy of hyperinfectivity, together with the fact that dissenting scientists have been derided by the Scientific establishment, make journalists very wary of quoting them. Their theories may not be right. But when a single case of BSE can cause such pandemonium, public fear and the desperate covering of official backs, they must surely now be properly and independently examined.
December 28/29 2003 ~ Ironically, three months ago, officials from the U.S. together with others from Canada and Mexico, wrote a letter to the 164-nation OIE
calling for a uniform system to deal with future BSE cases that would encourage full participation in testing and reporting the disease.
(See DowJones Newswires)
£8.8 billion is the estimated cost to the US economy of the discovery of this one BSE positive cow.
Given current ignorance about BSE, a genuine openness and sharing of expertise is now more urgently needed than ever. BSE paranoia across the globe calls out for international cooperation based, not merely on agro-economic worries about lost trade, but on proper independent scientific and veterinary research; in short, a return to common sense.
Dec 22 - 29 2003 ~" It is all but certain that their entire 4,000-strong herd will have to be slaughtered so that the brains and spinal tissue of the other animals can be tested."Independent
It looks as though healthy animals will be killed in their thousands in the US, just as in Britain five million cattle were slaughtered because of BSE. At least ten million animals - many breeding stock - were slaughtered unnecessarily in the foot and mouth crisis of 2001.
This is the response to animal disease in the 21st century. The Independent article (new window) shows that contaminated feed is still being blamed for BSE - despite the fact that more than 40,000 cows, born after the UK's 1988 ban on MBM
inclusion in cattle feed, developed BSE. After the 1996 ban on MBM
inclusion in feed destined for all types of livestock a further small number of cattle developed
BSE.
At the former experimental farm at Liscombe on Exmoor when cows were fed experimentally on pure grass and silage with no concentrated feeds at all, four animals still contracted BSE. The so called infectious prion agent is a malformed
prion protein that is resistant to all forms of enzyme digestion. How can it therefore be
absorbed as food?
According to Susan Haywood BVSc, PhD, MRCVS and David R. Brown M.Sc, Ph.D there is"a solid and expanding amount of literature showing that metal imbalance and TSEs are linked."
Mark Purdey amassed hard evidence to indicate that vCJD and BSE could both result from separate exposure of bovines and humans to the same set of toxic environmental factors - manganese and oxidizing agents. In spite of both field and laboratory observations, published data has been ignored by the Establishment. (warmwell BSE page)
It is puzzling that the UK authorities continue to dismiss outright any evidence that backs environmental involvement in TSEs. Professor Ebringer's highly interesting theory that vCJD is a microbe-based autoimmune disease like multiple sclerosis has also been ignored. The British government withdrew his research grant, forcing the disbanding of his entire King's College research department. It sometimes seems as if some kind of Witchfinder General is directing all policy involving new animal diseases; that anything challenging Prusiner's molecular "prion" theory must be stamped on and stamped out as heresy. Meanwhile, healthy animals must be sacrificed in order to "calm consumer fears".
Dec 22 - 29 2003 ~ BSE in Washington state: "The news played havoc on financial markets.."
says the Independent (new window), ".... shares in fast-food companies such as McDonald's and Wendy's plummeting and shares in Bio-Rad, a California bio-tech company responsible for a state-of-the-art test for BSE, gaining 20 per cent."
Concerned Americans may be searching the Phillips Report for words of wisdom. The taxes of the British public paid out 25 million pounds to finance the Report - but it is considered by many to have left unrevealed what lay beneath several large stones. The problems with the UK government's approach to BSE were repeated in its approach to foot and mouth - and continue still: a lack of collaboration, a reluctance to get to grips with independent research (especially from abroad) and poor communication with ordinary people who are nonetheless directly concerned.
In this letter to the (EFRA) Committee Chairman from Dr A G Dickinson (new window), there is criticism that "Lord Phillips deliberately excluded from his team anyone with direct involvement in TSE research "
In the midst of the inevitable new wave of hysteria and schadenfreudearound the world, those vets and family farmers who are still able to put ethical consideration before profit and ambition say that the way to keep animals healthy is to care for them, taking particular care of the environment in which they are kept. Anyone who has read Fast Food Nation (new window) with its exposé of the lawless industry behind fast food may read with relief that this crisis is causing shares to plummet. What should undermine consumer confidence is the murky state of the factory farmed meat industry and the collusion of those who should know better on both side of the Atlantic, not one poor unfortunate dead cow in the state of Washington.
Dec 22 - 29 2003 ~ First 'mad cow' case rattles US
The BBC reports on Washington state's consternation at finding that a "downer" cow, whose meat would appear to have already been processed and distributed, ("the meat was sent for processing and USDA's Food Safety and Inspection Service is working to determine the final disposition of products from the animal..." ) has tested positive for BSE. Ann Veneman insists that US beef is safe. Like John Gummer before her, she is talking about how she will eat US beef for Christmas. The BBC report says - without qualification now - that BSE "Can pass to humans through infected beef products.
Human form of disease called vCJD
vCJD has killed 137 people, mainly in the UK "
Reuters goes even further in its confident "scientific" pronouncements: "Mad cow disease, which officials said on Tuesday had been found for the first time in the United States, still mystifies scientists because it is not caused by a virus, bacteria or other microbes, does not alert the immune system and can jump from species to species. ...there is disagreement on just which beef products may carry the infectious prions that cause the disease"
The panic caused by BSE is hardly surprising. Although more people are killed on the road each week than by vCJD in years, the multi billion pound losses to the lucrative beef industry - in the UK, Japan, Canada and now, potentially, the United States itself - are huge. Scientific reputations are also on the line. And if, as seems more and more likely, they are wrong about the "infectious prion" theory? Britain's farming and food industry has been damaged by a tidal wave of unnecessary regulations and the EU Animal By-Products Regulation will drain billions more pounds from the UK economy.
Read again the article BSE - Dying to Know the Truth from the Ecologist. ( See also warmwell's BSE pages)
Dec 22 - 29 2003 ~ M-tuberculosis complex genetic probe has " proven to be 100% accurate in predicting the presence of bovine TB in 449 cases the DNR has tested through 2002."
From the Houghton Lake Reporter ".... The Bovine TB Eradication Project is a multi-agency team of experts from the Michigan Departments of Agriculture, Community Health, and Natural Resources; Michigan State University; and the U.S. Department of Agriculture. It continues to work collaboratively and aggressively to eradicate the disease from Michigan."
Dec 22 - 29 2003 ~ Hemispheric Conference on the eradication of Foot and Mouth Disease
- Houston, Texas, USA -
3 and 4 March 2004
is now being advertised on the Pan American Health Organisation's website
Objectives of the Conference -
"To increase awareness and generate support among the public and private sectors to enable the final stages of FMD eradication from the Western Hemisphere."
Dec 22 - 29 2003 ~ "Some procedural shortcomings" Misty.
The Scottish Ombudsman - although the pet goat was forcibly killed out of fear of infection, the Department explained that "normal preliminary disinfecting precautions were not taken after the cull as the risk of contamination after this was relatively low"
An article in the Scotsman last friday deals with the 92-page report by Scottish Public Services Ombudsman, Professor Alice Brown - just published now after three complaints were made over two years ago. It is with disappointment but not much surprise that we read Professor Brown's judgement that the killing of so many animals was "properly carried out" Had she judged otherwise, declaring along with Elliot Morley's own private admission, that there had been no legal basis for such a cull, it would surely have brought to an explosive political end all these months of contemptuous denial.
Even so, Professor Brown conceded that there were "some procedural shortcomings" - mainly relating to "the serving of notices". In a reference that can only refer to the incident involving Misty the pet goat, (this article on an American website clearly considered it one of the nastiest and most extraordinary examples of faceless bureaucratic cruelty in Scotland in 2001 ) we read that
It was also "unacceptable" that the owner's requests for information on what disinfection precautions she should take after the goat had been killed went unanswered.....I recommend that the Department now apologise to "Mrs Green" for this omission......
The Department of Rural Affairs eventually explained that normal preliminary disinfecting precautions were not taken after the cull as the risk of contamination after this was relatively low - despite having forcibly killed the goat due to infection concerns.
With such understatements are the horrors of 2001 swept gently under the carpet.
Dec 22 - 29 2003 ~
Interruption to Warmwell
Apologies for the silence of the past two weeks. This has been due to illness and hospitalisation - not to inertia. It is hoped that warmwell will be updated again in the near future. Many thanks indeed to those who have expressed concern. They will be contacted individually as soon as possible.
Dec 22 - 29 2003 ~ "The countryside matters. It matters more than Treasury borrowing limits or overspending."
" It matters more than tinkering with the health service and scheming over European voting rights. Such things are made by men and by men can be unmade. The countryside is for ever -- or for never. Fields and valleys, woods and hills once lost to building are gone. .." For anyone who (like us) missed this article by Simon Jenkins on December 12 Britain for sale: apply Gordon Brown and Co "....I have learnt that in this game there is no virtue in pleading Keats or Ruskin, let alone the glories of English nature. These philistines live in London and holiday abroad. We do better to confront them on their own ground, the concrete acres of the mind colonised by dismal science. ..
.. Of course people "want" better houses. But Britons are better housed than any other comparable nation. What they do want is something only government can deliver, the long-term protection of their landscape.
." (read in full)
Nov 30 - Dec 6 2003 ~ DEFRA's Contingency Plan fulfills the requirements of Section 32B of the Animal Health Act - to make "legal" pre-emptive or 'firebreak' culling
Paragraph 2.23 is deeply worrying. The pre-emptive, firebreak cull of 2001 was not legal - as Elliot Morley admitted to the EFRA committee on Tuesday 6 November 2001.
Such a cull of animals not exposed to the disease makes no scientific, veterinary or ethical sense when vaccination can be used instead.. The powers for pre-emptive (or preventive or "firebreak") culling of animals not exposed to FMD infection are, however, included in the Animal Health Act 2002. But the section (32B) demands that the Secretary of State "must prepare a document..." all the terms of which are conveniently provided for by the latest Contingency Plan and in particular Annex C The Contingency plan - with its inadequate planning for vaccination - is in effect, the very document needed for providing "legality" for the widespread culling of healthy animals, should the Secretary of State wish it.
What is the scientific and veterinary basis for this planning? The EU Directive requires that the composition of the Expert Group must be "balanced" It is important to know who is on this "permanently operational expert group" and how it can be said to be balanced in its range of expertise.
An emailer has written to this - a purely amateur website - to say, " Goodness knows we have all tried hard enough to fight this one, but we really need heavyweight individuals en masse (from the vet and legal world) behind this."
The veterinary and legal world may well be as alarmed as we are. But no signals of this have come our way. We can only ask concerned members of the public to fax letters to their MP, to the Royal Society ( 6-9 Carlton House Terrace
London, SW1Y 5AG,
tel: +44 (0)20 7839 5561
fax: +44 (0)20 7930 2170 ) and to the newspapers. Defra's progress and their press statement should be questioned. How easily the media have swallowed the vaccination line - but the devil is in the detail. See below.
Nov 30 - Dec 6 2003 ~ DEFRA's Contingency Plan. A MINIMUM of 5 days to elapse before vaccination implemented?
The word "immediately" does occur in the document - but sadly only in the sentence: "Emergency Vaccination will immediately be considered as an option..."
"4.3 The vaccination contractor (currently ADAS) is operationally capable of
vaccinating on day 5 of an outbreak with 25 vets and sufficient trained
vaccinators and support staff for 50 teams. Working under the overall control
of the SVS...
4.4 Veterinary advice to Ministers will be based on epidemiological
evidence and it is unlikely to be immediately available. It is probable that the
time necessary for veterinary assessment of epidemiological data, the use of
the Decision Tree and the development of advice on the strategic deployment
of vaccination make it unlikely that vaccination would start as soon as five
days after the first confirmed case."
How can it be thought that vaccination is being seriously considered if such statements are made? The very wording conjures up a picture of the same, sorry, bureaucratic dithering and lack of co-ordination that led to such misery and frustration last time. This seems to be lip service to vaccination - not the "U-Turn" that some papers are suggesting.
Nov 30 - Dec 6 2003 ~ New Contingency Plan incorporates the Animal Health Act 2002 - slaughter of healthy animals could be easier
Deep concern has been expressed to warmwell that the public spin by Ben Bradshaw does not reflect the small print of the new DEFRA Contingency Plan - which lays out even more clearly that healthy animals will be killed. The revised Animal Health Act - which caused such consternation and widespread criticism last year - is incorporated.
2.23 Additional control strategies include:-
culling of other susceptible livestock exposed to the disease (e.g. premises under virus plumes, premises contiguous to the infected premises);
and
- pre-emptive or 'firebreak' culling of animals not on infected premises, not dangerous contacts or not necessarily exposed to the disease, in order to prevent the wider spread of the disease outwith an area.
2.24 A Disease Control (Slaughter) Protocol setting out the requirements that must be followed in the event of a pre-emptive cull is at Annex C. (See more of the relevant sections)
Vaccine Top of List in U-Turn The Western Morning News today quotes
Janet Bayley, of the National Foot and Mouth Group, who said the emphasis on vaccination was welcome, but warned that the plans could still allow a repeat of the contiguous cull.
"... Obviously we welcome the progress on vaccination, but the detail in the contingency plan gives even greater powers for the Government to kill healthy animals. That is not what we envisaged as the outcome of the discussions that have gone on."
Nov 30 - Dec 6 2003 ~ Problems "now" overcome?
We read in the FT , under the headline
"Foot-and-mouth vaccines ready"
by John Mason
( Last Updated: December 2 2003 4:00)
Vaccination could be used to combat future outbreaks of foot-and-mouth disease five days after the first reported case, Ben Bradshaw, animal health minister, said. Britain now has the stocks of vaccines ready for any outbreak while technical problems distinguishing vaccinated animals from those infected with the disease - which prevented the use of the strategy in the 2001 epidemic - have now been overcome.
The wording of the DEFRA news release , implying that "progress" on the part of DEFRA has "now" made it possible to use vaccination or distinguish between vaccinated and unvaccinated animals, has evidently made it possible for parts of the media in its turn to imply that vaccination was not possible in 2001 and that the ability to distinguish vaccinates from unvaccinated animals was not possible in 2001. Both were, of course, perfectly possible. Only the political will was lacking. Consequently, the contiguous cull was the ineffectual and bloody answer for the politicians - who realised far too late that it was, disastrously, the wrong answer.
Nov 30 - Dec 6 2003 ~ "The latest act of pure genius"....Muckspreader in Private Eye
" to emerge from the corporate mind of the department for the elimination of farming and rural affairs (Defra), with a little help from their friends in Brussels, is the need for pig owners to apply for a licence when they take their 'pig for a walk'.
Thumping onto the doormat of every pig owner in the country on 1 November came a leaflet on 'New Pig Identification Rules', telling them how to comply with the new Pigs (Records, Identication and Movement) Order 2003 Dutifully signed by that great rural affairs expert Ben Bradshaw, the minister who advertises on his website that he once came 112th in a poll of 'heroes to Britain's gay and lesbian community', Defra regarded this as a further measure necessary to comply with EC directive 92/102
.....
....
So excited has one Kent farmer, Ben Garratt, become at the thought of giving useful employment to Defra's team of veterinary officials (alas only at half-strength by the latest count) that he proposes farmers should celebrate by staging a 'National Pig Walking Day', Thousands of pig-owners will simultaneously ring up Defra to ask for the services of an official to approve their proposed route. The countryside will soon be covered in Defra inspectors, earnestly checking every inch of path, field and stile....." Read in full
Nov 30 - Dec 6 2003 ~ Why are "pig pyramids" exempted?
" Pig pyramids almost certainly introduced and definitely spread PMWS and Swine Fever" is the opinion of an East Anglian emailer, who sends us this quotation from the Defra booklet "New Pig Identification rules as of 1 November 2003" on http://www.npa-uk.net/Library/Defra-Pig%20ID%20rules%20Lflt.pdf
"When a pig moves onto your holding, no other pig can move off for 20 days except for slaughter or to a slaughter market. Cattle, sheep and goats must respect a 6 day standstill. Pigs in a Defra authorised "pyramid" as approved in writing by the local Divisional Veterinary Manager are exempt from the 20 day rule."
"So," writes the emailer, "special exemption from the law for the big, usually multi-national, pig pyramids is allowed by permission ...."
Since, as the emailer points out, the leaflet was "developed in consultation with BPEX, the British Pig Association and the National Pig Association." complete with all their logos, it makes one wonder. What does "DEFRA approved" mean? Since
the only people prosecuted and heavily fined for the illegal movement of pigs during the Classical Swine Fever epidemic in East Anglia were pig pyramid companies, to exempt them from movement restrictions now - while insisting on restrictions for everyone else - seems odd.
The emailer says, "There have been complaints of animal cruelty at their premises, including the famous "missing Court Case" when the RSPCA and Hillside Sanctuary (Redwing) took BQP to court for animal cruelty."
Nov 30 - Dec 6 2003 ~ DEFRA - late payments
The continuing wrangle over the late payment of invoices connected with Foot and Mouth was the top story on the Farming Today programme on Radio 4 (Tuesday Dec 2).
The story is available on the Internet and can be accessed by visiting the link below and clicking on 'listen to the latest Farming Today programme' link.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/news/farmingtoday/index.shtml
Nov 30 - Dec 6 2003 ~ DEFRA announces progress on Vaccination as an "additional control strategy for FMD"
Dec 1 The DEFRA news release says, "... Ben Bradshaw, wrote to the Royal Society last week, detailing the progress made on their recommendation" (Reminder of Royal Society recommendations)" that emergency vaccination should be developed so it could be available for use as a prime control strategy in addition to culling of infected animals and dangerous contacts in a future outbreak of Foot and Mouth Disease."
We learn from the news release that "Defra has already carried out a total of over 50 Foot and Mouth Disease exercises and training events, mainly at regional level since the last outbreak." and that "...Defra is planning a series of exercises over the next seven months to check and validate the Foot and Mouth Disease Contingency Plan. The programme will culminate in a live exercise on 29 and 30 June 2004."
The wording of the news release suggests that Ben Bradshaw claims credit for DEFRA on:
- Negotiation of a new EU Directive on Foot and Mouth Disease control, moving vaccination to the forefront of disease control strategy.
- Engaging with stakeholders to gain the necessary support from the farming and food industries to make emergency vaccination a workable option in the event of a future outbreak.
- Procurement of independent supplies of Foot and Mouth Disease vaccine for the UK, which is suitable for use in a "vaccinate-to-live" strategy in the event of a future outbreak.
- Ongoing work on the development of vaccination scenarios including a Cost Benefit Analysis to help decision making on future disease control strategy.
- Continuing to fund research into tests that would demonstrate the absence of infection in animals post-vaccination.
- Putting in place operational arrangements with an external contractor that would enable an emergency vaccination programme to be implemented 5 days after confirmation of the disease, subject to veterinary and epidemiological advice.
The revised version of the Foot and Mouth Disease Contingency Plan www.defra.gov.uk/corporate/consult/fmd-contingency03/index.htm. (link mended) The consultation period for responses closes on Friday 20 February 2004.
Nov 30- Dec 6 2003 ~ "...unnecessarily bureaucratic framework"
Honest Food has responded to, and welcomed, DEFRA's Outline of an Animal Health and Welfare Strategy for Great Britain. Preliminary comments include the following statement:
"Prolix and unnecessary documents do not make the lives of stakeholders, animal keepers or the various professionals who have to deal with the subject any easier as well as creating the impression that an unnecessarily bureaucratic framework is being created."
....
Extracts from comments on the strategies:- insufficient emphasis on the need to take scientific research and its results from outside the UK and, even the EU. Private enterprise in scientific research ought not to be treated disdainfully. Naturally, the studies we have in mind are those that have been carried out under well-defined conditions and have had their results peer-reviewed (a necessary detail, not mentioned in the Outline).
- It has not been specified that all EU legislation and regulation has to be transposed into British legislation as a matter of legal requirement. This may seem obvious to DEFRA but is not always obvious to all stakeholders...
- We also hope that assurances that EU legislation and regulation will not be gold-plated in the UK will, finally, be put into practice....so far, little has changed.
- (We) look forward to a more detailed break-down of resources devoted to necessary research rather than the continuing "firefighting" and slaughter ...
- We hope that assurances about best practice and scientific research outside the UK being used will apply equally to questions of veterinary and epidemiological surveillance. It is imperative that we should leave what might be termed "the not invented here attitude" be abandoned at all levels.
- If the profitability of high levels of animal health and welfare are questionable and ill-understood concepts, then the need for a general and far-reaching discussion about the future of the livestock industry is very great, indeed.
Read in full
Nov 28 2003 ~"It is time that family farmers learned those names and addresses so that a united resistance can begin in earnest"
Yesterday's "welcome news of a forecasted rise in farm incomes by 35%" (FWi), as any family farmer knows, is misleading. Net farm income is calculated before any allowance is made for the labour and management contributions of farm family members.
"Other than the farmer link, every link of the agri-food chain is dominated by between two and ten multibillion-dollar transnationals and, perhaps not coincidentally, every one of these links is characterized by large profits"
The CNFU report lists and demolishes 9 myths about competition and efficiency. The report ends "That agribusiness corporations would rob farmers should be no surprise. But that our democratic governments would so betray us should surprise many Canadians. Not only have our governments told lies that obscure the mechanisms behind the rural crisis; our governments have pushed through laws that have armed the pillagers and weakened farmers and rural communities.
..... To paraphrase the words of folk singer Utah Phillips:
The family farm is not dying - it is being killed.
And the people who are killing it have names and addresses.
It is time that family farmers learned those names and addresses so that a united resistance can begin in earnest."
The report should be required reading for every politician or pundit who ever mentions farming in this or any other country. And anyone, farmer or just sympathiser, who feels that something very rotten is at work against our family farms will find much to think about in the Canadian experience. The CNFU, it seems, are prepared to fight back.
Nov 28 2003 ~"...one is left to wonder why no other explanation other
than BSE as the cause of variant CJD is considered"
".....the blatant lie spread, particularly
by the media, that beef from BSE-infected cattle carries the
infectious agent of BSE. There is no evidence that a piece
of meat cut from a BSE-infected cow contains PrPSc. When
such a critical piece of evidence is missing from the picture
one is left to wonder why no other explanation other
than BSE as the cause of variant CJD is considered.....
Perhaps variant CJD was caused by BSE, but if there is
another cause and all endeavours to investigate any are
discredited as being illogical or ridiculous, then no
advance to prevent or treat the variant CJD will be
achieved beyond the serendipitous result of trial and
error. ...
the pan-European occurrence of BSE
suggests that alternative explanations must be considered.
Although environmental damage due to industrialization
sounds a rather vague cause for BSE it is a
sufficiently broad base on which to launch well planned
investigations into the cause of these diseases..." D. R. Brown,
Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath, UK in his paper "BSE did not cause variant CJD:
an alternative cause related to
post-industrial environmental
contamination" pdf external link, new window
Nov 27/28 2003 ~ who is benefiting by short-circuiting our
attempts to understand and remedy the crisis gripping our family farms and rural communities
".... the same basic prescription: Competition (facilitated by
globalization, free trade, open markets, and deregulation) combined with technological
innovation will lead to higher efficiency and fewer but larger farms. However, when we
analyze this prescription and look at the underlying premises, we find that this plan for
restructuring agriculture based on competition and efficiency is constructed of myths and false
assumptions--some would say "lies."
It is worth saving the pdf file of the CNFU report and examining it properly. As the Canadian report says, "... Why would we destabilize and torment our farm families, ceaselessly
pushing them toward ever-larger economies of scale, making them live in insecurity and
worry, breaking farms and emptying communities, if, in the end, any efficiency gains will
simply be pocketed by powerful transnationals?"
Nov 27 2003 ~ New Zealand seeks response management software for animal disease
Computer World (New Zealand)
"a GIS system that fits in with MAF's own GIS infrastructure and a web-based application interface."
"MAF is seeking a critical intelligence software tool to be the framework for controlling animal diseases, including foot and mouth.
While there has never been a recorded case of foot-and-mouth in New Zealand, a recent review of MAF's capability to respond to an outbreak "indicated the need for the completion of key foot and mouth preparedness projects", according to tender documents issued by MAF.
The tools sought include response management software, a GIS system that fits in with MAF's own GIS infrastructure and a web-based application interface.
Up to 90 reports will be required, using Crystal Reports and interoperability with other related government databases such as AgriBase and LINZ...."
Nov 27 2003 ~" It is important that animal keepers have confidence that their animals will be treated within an ethical, open and pre-agreed framework"
"Outline of an animal health and welfare strategy for Great Britain", a consultation document from DEFRA, invited responses.
Mary Marshall of the European Livestock Alliance has produced a thorough response to the outline While she welcomes DEFRA's document, she also feels that many of the issues need a fundamentally new approach. Among her main points - It is important that animal keepers have confidence that their animals will be treated within an ethical, open and pre-agreed framework which allows secondary diagnostic tests to confirm initial general tests prior to slaughter.
- Control of animal diseases is for the good of the whole population and therefore the government must share the costs. Prevention of disease is a concern and responsibility of government, as well as the concern and responsibility of animal keepers.
- It is the government's responsibility to prevent initial import of notifiable disease.
- Animal keepers need to be trained to recognise the symptoms of and to report notifiable disease
- It is worrying that "control" is taken to be the equivalent of "Biosecurity", as if there were no other possible control measures.
- there is concern that government will pick and choose which FMD recommendations will be implemented. The final EU FMD Directive requires that the composition of the Expert Group must be "balanced".
- "Stakeholders" must be informed if "consultation" is to mean what it implies. Even with this one, Ms Marshall learned from participants at regional stakeholders meetings that, of those stakeholders that were consulted, very few feel that their views were noted
Perhaps most importantly, Ms Marshall notes that there is no mention of the IAH-Pirbright nor of diagnostic tests, both of which should play a key role in an animal health strategy for Great Britain. The government bears the responsibility of not imposing regulations that put animals at unjustified risk. It bears a responsibility to seek and take best scientific advice. (read in full)
Nov 19 - 26 2003 ~ The MPs seemed shocked and embarrassed that the contractors had not yet been paid.
FWi
"Many of them have gone out of business and some are teetering on the edge of bankruptcy. The effects of this have been psychological as well as practical and these people have been struggling for the past two years without money owed to them."
Nobody was available for comment from Defra"
Nov 19 - 26 2003 ~" when family farms are painted as
inefficient, then their loss can be swept aside as an unfortunate but
necessary effect of progress..."
www.nfu.ca/briefs/Myths_PREP_PDF_TWO.bri.pdf A new report from Canada's National Farmers Union considers
agribusiness transnationals and their role in creating the farm crisis. ".....Inefficiency rhetoric is nothing
more than a smokescreen: a propaganda tactic deployed against farm families,
workers, and rural communities. Only by peeling away the myths and lies can
we understand the rural crisis and begin to see who is destroying our
farms....."
Robin Maynard from FARM said in this response, "... Time and time again we hear politicians and industry pundits like Lord Haskins and Sean Rickard telling farmers in the UK that they've got to 'get bigger', 'be more efficient', so as to compete with farmers from North America, Australia, Argentina etc etc.
CNFU's analysis shows that to be a false route which ignores the realities of a world market dominated by vast agribusinesses with disproportionate power. ..." (More)
Nov 19 - 26 2003 ~ Experimenting on non-human primates is not only ethically unsupportable, it is scientifically unreliable
John Prescott has announced planning approval for Cambridge University's monkey brain research centre (Monkey lab gets go ahead, November 22).
A letter to the Guardian (Wednesday) says, ".... He continues in the government's misguided tradition of supporting animal experiments at all costs. Experimenting on non-human primates is not only ethically unsupportable, it is scientifically unreliable. Brain-damaging monkeys to use them as "models" of human disease is fraught with difficulties and there are dramatic differences in the way that humans and other primates react to supposedly similar brain conditions.
Prescott arrogantly ignored the clear recommendation by the planning inspector to reject the project. A full public hearing was held last year and the inspector concluded that the university had failed to demonstrate that the centre was in the national interest as the government had asserted. Is it any wonder that an increasing number of citizens feel their only option is to abandon the political process and turn to protest instead?
Wendy Higgins
British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection "
Nov 19 - 26 2003 ~ "An alternative explanation is staring them in the face..."
"...Cattle get TB because the trace element deficiencies in their forage render them unable to mount a defence against the challenge...
...reactor numbers are going up because every year the vital nutrients, primarily selenium, zinc, cobalt and also copper and iodine, are becoming more depleted with persistent failure to restore them to the soil. Inevitably, every year cattle defences weaken and they become more susceptible to infection from the silent carriers in their midst........Ben Bradshaw says the Government is keen to forge ahead with other measures. But there is no mention of testing the obvious; a nutritional solution to make our animals resistant to TB and indeed to any other infections that could be avoided."
Extract from a letter by Helen Fullerton of the Farming and Livestock Concern UK to this week's Farmers Guardian
Nov 19 - 26 2003 ~ the increasing take-over of our food-chain globally and nationally by agribusiness
FARM sends this press release. "... The steady take-over of food production by large agribusiness companies is a key force behind the crisis in farming, which currently sees over 300 UK farmers and farm workers leave the land every week.
FARM aims to engage consumers in the fight for a viable future for farming. The Internet is a powerful way of spreading messages fast ..."
Nov 19 - 26 2003 ~ Ben Bradshaw says "In 2002 - 03 we spent nearly £74 million on the bovine tuberculosis (TB) Five Point Plan.." - but there is to be no second test for the Morris family
See Hansard ".... We are keen to improve diagnosis of the disease in both cattle and badgers and have commissioned the Veterinary Laboratories Agency to carry out two research projects, at a total estimated cost of over £950,000.
..."
Meanwhile, the Morris family are still in dispute with DEFRA over their two cows. Having had several reactor cows that tested negative after slaughter in the past, the Morris' concern can be understood. During FMD the family battled to save their herd and learned the hard way that officials prefer to follow rigid "regulations" rather than consider the facts of each case. They are not permitted a second test to verify the Ministry's skin test on two cows who reacted on June 30th. They cannot understand why they should not be allowed to pay for a more reliable test themselves, nor why they never get an answer when they ask what legislation gives DEFRA the right to slaughter their cows. Meanwhile, their local DEFRA office has written to say that another warrant has been applied for.
Nov 19 - 26 2003 ~ New Chief Vet
Debby Reynolds, Defra SVS, is the Veterinary Director for the FSA. She was a member of the FMD official Science Group. She has been appointed to take over from Mr Scudamore.
Nov 19 - 26 2003 ~ "...there is a growing belief that detailed investigation is needed into other possible causes, including unexplained transmission from cow to cow or long-term contamination in soil."
Nov 19 - 26 2003 ~ "DEFRA has announced £1.6m research project
to assess the links between
breeding for scrapie resistance and economically important production and
health traits. .. The four-year United Kingdom study, which will get underway early next year, will look to provide assurances on the possible impacts the National Scrapie Plan may have on economically important breed traits, and propose breeding strategies to help minimise the loss of genetic variability.
The study will be led chiefly by scientists at the Scottish Agricultural College and the Roslin Institute.
."
Mark Purdey's recent comment: "....
The taxes of the British public paid out 25 million pounds to finance the
recent Lord Phillip's BSE Inquiry - published October 2000. This Inquiry reached
the decisive conclusion that scrapie had nothing to do with the cause of BSE. ( "The cases of BSE identified between 1986 and 1988 were not index cases, nor were they the result of the transmission of scrapie")
... I remain amazed that none of
the bodies that are pretending to represent the farmer's interests..
NFU, or sheep groups... are not picking up on this...."
Nov 19 - 26 2003 ~ "There is no need for additional equipment, the test is performed at room temperature and results are available in less than 3.5 hours."
(From the Idexx press release on the new USDA approved test for TSEs) IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. (NASDAQ: IDXX), announced today (Nov 17) that it has received USDA approval for the sale of its IDEXX HerdChek® Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) Antigen Test Kit.
(which) utilizes a novel Seprion ligand capture technology licensed from Microsens Biotechnologies.... a scientific research and licensing company founded in 1998 to develop technologies for the rapid and sensitive detection of transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs) and other related protein aggregation diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease - collectively known as the "protein conformation disorders." Based at the London Bioscience Innovation Centre, the company operates a dedicated category 3 level containment facility capable of handling bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), Scrapie, Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) and Creutzfeld-Jacob Disease (CJD) infected materials."
Nov 19 - 26 2003 ~" it is quite possible that BSE and variant CJD have emerged as a result of manganese-rich industrial pollution that has only occurred in the last century."
From the ELA (European Livestock Alliance) website: "One of Ela's goals is to bring scientists, breeders and keepers together to work out a strategy for TSEs, FMD etc. The increase of TSEs in mammals throughout the world is alarming and needs cooperation and research by unbiased scientists.
We can't rule out pollution, effects of minerals, insects, in short - environmental circumstances. There are so many differences of opinion amongst scientists that it is essential to start working together" The website brings together several up to date scientific papers, including those of Dr. David Brown M.Sc, Ph.D.
and Susan Haywood BVSc, PhD, MRCVS :"
.....it is time for a re-evaluation of the collated information, together with more recent investigations which have an important bearing on the pathogenesis on this unique class of diseases."
Nov 19 - 26 2003 ~" the science went out of the window, as perceived self-interest and political expediency came in"
Tom Griffith-Jones' article on GM suggests that farmers - both arable and livestock farmers - are in a unique position to speak out against GM. "The great advantage of the farming industry is that it is one of the few where the decisions of individuals can make a real difference. We are an amalgam of a myriad of small businesses, making our own decisions. "
"....In Manitoba, one of the prairie provinces, GM maize is now listed as one of the ten main weed species... after only seven years of these crops. ...extra sprays have to be used to remove these Roundup-resistant volunteers. Yields are no higher, and often lower than the non-GM version. It is no longer possible to grow organic oilseed rape in Saskatchewan, because of the contamination of the crop by GM volunteers, and a large industry has been destroyed. Even the seed merchants are finding it impossible to keep their seed clean of GM contamination.
As a result of all these difficulties, 95% of Canadian farmers don't want GM wheat, which the biotechnology companies are now trying to get approved. The message from the visiting Canadians was: "learn from our mistakes - don't repeat them".
... leading scientists in the field have stopped their research because they consider the outcomes potentially too dangerous."
See also the Alliance for Bio-Integrity
Nov 19 - 26 2003 ~ The whole of the EU's scrapie eradication programme thus rests on a card-house of unproven hypotheses.
"Phyllida Barstowe is not only an admired novelist and married to the journalist Duff Hart-Davis, but professionally breeds Wiltshire Horn sheep on their Gloucestershire farm. Until recently her flock roamed happily over the meadows round a fine young pure-bred ram. Then, on 1 September, she was visited by the department for the elimination of farming and rural affairs (Defra), to test her sheep under the EU-sponsored 'National Scrapie Plan'. ...." From Private Eye's Muckspreader
Nov 19 - 26 2003 ~ Margaret Beckett "astonished" by Tory claims about "how terrible things are in the countryside"
Western Morning News "....Margaret Beckett claimed the Government was "pouring" money into rural areas like the Westcountry.
She was "astonished" by Tory claims about "how terrible things are in the countryside" and said the Government was making "considerable progress" in meeting the commitments made in the Rural White Paper three years ago.
.......
Shadow Countryside Minister James Gray ".... certainly things like achieving EU sugar beet standards are perfectly laudable," he said.
"But frankly that sort of thing butters few parsnips in the countryside.
.... "If the Rural White Paper and annual updates are to have any value at all they should be demanding an analysis of how the Government is achieving what it set out to achieve.
If all they are is spin-doctors' self-congratulatory platitudes there is little point in having them."....
......... merging independent wildlife watchdog English Nature with parts of Defra and the Countryside Agency.
Ian Liddell-Grainger, Tory MP for Bridgwater, said there was a real danger that the proposed new agency would create "a muddle of interference and bureaucrats" that would do little for either rural communities or wildlife.
Mrs Beckett said a full response to the Haskins report would be published next spring." Read in full
Nov 19 - 26 2003 ~ 17,000 farm
workers gave up last year
FWi
"Government statistics show 6,000 farmers and 11,000 labourers left their
businesses in the 12 months up to the 2003 June census.
The 4.6% drop in the workforce means nearly 85,000 have left farming since
the Labour government took office in 1997..."
As John Humphrys said in his recent article "... It is almost impossible to make a living from a small dairy farm. A few years ago 50 milking cows would produce a decent income. Now you need at least twice as many just to survive.
There is no doubt that the rural economy would benefit from more small organic farms. So would the environment. So, ultimately, would the consumer.......
Our farm animals would benefit, too.... it would help if the welfare of animals and the future of organic farming were seen as two elements in a bigger issue. I think it's called joined-up government. ."
Nov 19 - 26 2003 ~ the Government should be putting some effort into Gamma
interferon testing
(see below) John Bourn speaking on Farming Today repeated the
unreliablility of tuberculin skin testing regime as a means of diagnosis
and said that the Government should be putting some effort into Gamma
interferon testing and - yes - the development of a vaccine.
Nov 19 - 26 2003 ~ Plans to tag every sheep in Europe got the thumbs down this afternoon.
The Scotsman
"Euro MPs rejected the European Commission proposal, opting instead for a UK-style system of monitoring movements of flocks, and not individual animals.
The Commission scheme would have cost UK farmers an estimated £96 million to put a 14-digit code number in both ears of each of the nation's 37 million sheep....."
Nov 19 - 26 2003 ~ "This is actually far worse than Foot and Mouth"
The stalemate situation is taking its toll on the Morris family. Having seen DEFRA's arguments - which they have found most unimpressive - the Morris family are taking a breathing space, mainly because of the emotional price they are having to pay over the whole issue. James, who is 8, seeing and sharing the family distress, is saying with classic childish logic, that it is "all his fault" . There is likely to be a radio documentary on the subject of the Morris family's fight but at present the emotional impact, on the children particularly, is making the parents wary of inflaming the situation. But Mrs Morris tells us that there are now many champions in the wings waiting to give support. She is bemused by the way the officials have either no idea of the anguish their manner is creating - or simply don't care.
Nov 19 - 26 2003 ~ Owen Paterson has been appointed the new Shadow Minister for Agriculture
working under Shadow Secretary of State for Agriculture, John Whittingdale. We remember with gratitude Mr Paterson's involvement in the FMD crisis and the questions he has raised in Parliament. During the foot and mouth crisis, he was an incisive critic of
the Government bungling. He was the first MP to insist that the Government
dig out, read and learn from the Northumberland Report (1968 - opens in new window) into the previous
outbreak. He has been a consistent supporter of small abattoirs, small
food producers, the horse industry and local diversity and has campaigned
against new regulations by all agencies of Government.
Nov 11 - 18 2003 ~ "Factory farms are more dangerous for our lifestyle and democracy than Osama bin Laden and global terrorism"
Robert Kennedy JNr quoted in this sobering article on Smithfield in today's Independent on the subject of Smithfield in Poland. "People who live near the factory farms complain of nausea, asthma attacks and blackouts. Children at the school village began vomiting. Activists point to US studies which they claim show that factory farm workers and their neighbours contract lung disease, eye infections, nosebleeds and gastro intestinal illness.
..."
Smithfield's activity in Poland was exposed in the Spectator article last week. See also what Senator Kennedy had to say in April about how conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan have taken attention away from environmental issues in the US, making it easier for large corporations to operate without public scrutiny and enabling them to make scandalous deals. "Smithfield Foods, the largest pork producer in the world, invented a way of raising pigs in large factory farms which creates huge amounts of pollution, impoverishes farmers, and distorts markets. By educating the public, politicians and press in other countries like Poland, we have been able to stop Smithfield from expanding into those countries.
As a result of President Bush's efforts to bring Poland into the coalition against Iraq, there was a 12.5-billion-dollar loan guarantee. Attached to that guarantee were a number of requirements that forced Poland to accept U.S. corporate presence in their country including Smithfield. Part of the loan has to be repaid to Smithfield. ..."
Nov 11 - 18 2003 ~ "The devastating foot and mouth outbreak is only too fresh in our minds...
... for us not to be extremely alarmed by the news that the systems for tracking and identifying livestock in England are below standard"
".... MP Edward Leigh, who chairs the Commons public accounts committee, said he was "extremely alarmed" by the problems identified in the report, which are estimated to cost taxpayers at least £15 million a year.
"The information held is often inaccurate and out of date, with five per cent of cattle movements reported over five weeks late. The Cattle Tracing System in particular is seriously technically flawed - it cannot link up properly with vets' computer systems, and is increasingly unreliable.
"I can't see how we can be confident that the systems would be effective in helping to track the progress of a fast-moving disease around the country.
"The department must get to grips with improving the accuracy of its data." Western Morning News (Tuesday) on the National Audit Office report
Nov 11 - 18 2003 ~ Farmers Guardian: "OPs - have your say"
Alistair Driver writes about the issue in the Farmers Guardian this week and there are many letters. "...The message coming through loud and clear to FG is that many farmers who believe they have been affected by those chemicals feel they have waited long enough - and another four years is just not acceptable." FG has announced this week that it will hold an in-paper seminar to replace that "postponed" by the government....it is not about allocating blame; it is about taking a close - and fair look at the facts. Don't miss your chance to speak up."
"If you would like to make a contribution, please write, with any relevant information and your contact details) to Farmers Guardian, Fulwood Park, Caxton Road, Preston PR2 9NZ or email falkingham@cmpinformation.com"
See also Muckspreader
Nov 11 - 18 2003 ~ 12,000 species face extinction
" A sobering list of species threatened with extinction by damaging human activities has been published by scientists, with a warning that some cannot be saved..
"Places such as the Galapagos, Hawaii and the Seychelles are famed for their beauty, which owes itself to the diversity of plants, animals and ecosystems.
"The Red List tells us that human activities are leading to a swathe of extinctions that could make these islands ecologically and aesthetically barren." ...."
." BBC
Nov 11 - 18 2003 ~ total suspension of common sense
...
agvisiontv.com (Canada) In the course of an interview about BSE, dated today, Dr Paul Kitching was asked, "You were critical of the way Britain handled that outbreak arguing that the slaughter.... was a "total suspension of common sense"
.......What lessons can we learn from the British experience with foot and mouth?"
Dr. Kitching: Yes it was not so much a criticism of the policy as it was a criticism of the science that went behind the policy.A lot of the policy was being dictated by predictive models and in my opinion, these predictive models just didn't have the adequate information to make them worthwhile.....policy was being dictated by these predictive models and as a consequence, a very large number of healthy animals were slaughtered.
..Inevitably when you have an outbreak of that size...politicians become involved and control the program. I think it's important that when these types of outbreaks occur that the control program is left in the hands of those who have been trained to run the control programs. They understand the disease and they understand the natural history of the disease and the rules by which the virus survives. Knowing that type of information you can bring these diseases under control - as it's been shown in the past many times...."
Nov 11 - 18 2003 ~ Pigs on the trotter
"Farmers have been delighted to receive the latest stroke of genius by the officials of the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: a leaflet informing them that, if they wish to take a pig for a walk, they must now obtain from Defra a "pet walking licence".
Furthermore, before they set out, they must notify their local Defra office, so that a veterinary official can visit to "inspect the proposed route" of the walk. Astonishingly, for the moment, pig owners are not expected to pay for this novel service." Booker's Notebook
Nov 11 - 18 2003 ~ Britain's richest farmers are set to keep the lion's share of the country's £2bn-a-year farm subsidies ...
(Links here) John Humphrys' article in the Sunday Times November 9 2003 (see warmwell link) included this forthright statement: "The common agricultural policy has been an unmitigated disaster, riddled with inefficiencies and corruption."
The Financial Times today quotes Graham Ward, a lettuce grower and chairman of the National Farmers' Union's horticultural board: "If Mrs Beckett believes in sustainable development, she will have to explain why she is basing a policy for the future so much on the past. This would go completely against what reform of the common agricultural policy (CAP) is all about. It is like promising you will find a new name for your dog Fido and then calling him Fido 2."
Nov 11 - 18 2003 ~ There is much lip-service in the Animal Health and Welfare Strategy to the word "welfare"
and a constant reiteration of "positive approach to health" ideology. However, when it comes down to the practical detail - the DEFRA proposed "Action Plan" for farm animal health - it appears that "positive" may be rather more focussed on disease prevention than on health promotion..." Following John Humphrys' thought-provoking article in the Sunday Times (see below) , Mike Meredith (of pighealth.com) has written: Can Biosecurity Go Too Far?
for the American Association of Swine Veterinarians"..... the relentless pressure for increased scale and efficiency of farm enterprises, driven by the insatiable consumer appetite for cheap food of consistent and "biosecure" quality. He (i.e. John Humphrys) cogently points out the illusory nature of cheap food - the hidden costs it can hold for taxpayers, human health and the environment. We are only too well aware of that in Britain, where UK taxpayers picked up a 10 billion-dollar tab for the foot-and-mouth epidemic, plus thousands of people lost their livelihoods and environmental consequences of the millions of carcases in mass burial sites will be around for many years to come.
....
Biosecurity barriers cut both ways, restricting the movement of undesirable life-forms, but also restricting potentially beneficial movement and communication......
" . (More)
(DEFRA's outline of the AHAWS strategy )
Nov 11 - 18 2003 ~ The European Court of Auditors is believed to be deeply concerned by FMD's spiralling costs and by the controversial contiguous cull policy
Report by Western Morning News report (Friday) Foot and Mouth Fiasco to cost Taxpayers Dear
"European Commission officials are to visit the UK next week to complete an audit that could see Britain lose hundreds of millions of pounds because of the Government's disastrous handling of the 2001 foot and mouth crisis"...."That money must not come off agricultural budgets - British farmers must not be allowed to suffer a second time because of the Government's incompetence."
" MEP Neil Parish
".....The team will also examine the huge costs associated with the controversial animal burial pits - particularly the £7 million cost of the Ash Moor pit in North Devon, which was never used, and the £19 million pit at Eppynt, in Wales, where 18,000 carcasses had to be exhumed and burnt because of leakage into watercourses." Read in full
Nov 11 - 18 2003 ~ "The control of disease by killing farm animals is promoted unashamedly and no apology made for failing to apply methods in human medicine to the care of farm animals.."
Ruth Watkins' article for warmwell last December: "...DEFRA and the veterinary establishment have failed to recognise that humans are animals too. The farm animals must be as remarkably similar on genetic analysis to humans as mice have proven to be. The immune system must be very similar to our own. The control of disease by killing farm animals is promoted unashamedly and no apology made for failing to apply methods in human medicine to the care of farm animals...
Dr Doherty suggested they could be given chocolate containing BCG, "badger chocolates". Cattle can also be immunised, more practically by subcutaneous inoculation as in humans - it will cause an ulcer at the inoculation site in them as it does in us. The immunity is at least partially protective.
..... the gamma interferon test has been licensed by the FDA for use in humans and has been developed for cattle. The tools of modern medicine are there to be used to combat the spread of Mycobacterium bovis and ultimately to eliminate the infection."
(An emailer has also written in to tell readers that a good homeopathic remedy exists for TB in cattle. See Inbox)
Nov 11 - 18 2003 ~ "There has got to be a better test"
(Thursday) DEFRA are leaning heavily in the Morris family to decide by "the end of play" today (Defra's unfortunate phrase) whether they will agree to have their two reactor cows privately killed. Mrs Morris has again "for the umpteenth time" she says patiently, asked under what legislation DEFRA can insist on the compulsory slaughter of these animals. She and her husband - experienced dairy farmers - do not believe them to be infected and their vet agrees that there seem to be no signs at all. All they want is another test to validate the skin test results from June 30. "There simply has to be a better test," she says. "If we can diagnose TB in humans without slaughtering them first why can we not use some of the human health methods for veterinary problems? It doesn't make sense."
Nov 11 - 18 2003 ~ 100,000 cows go missing from records
Telegraph "The National Audit Office said that the statistical black hole was costing the Government £15 million a year. The additional costs included paying staff to correct the errors, extra postage and European Commission penalties.
It was critical of the way the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs operated its systems for identifying and tracking 25 million cattle, sheep and pigs in England.
The NAO found that a quarter of postal applications for cattle passports contained errors. It also discovered that movement records were incomplete for one in eight animals, with the result that the whereabouts of two per cent of cattle was "uncertain".
..... A Defra spokesman said it was working towards the further reduction of mistakes."
One emailed comment read this morning: " The cattle movement records are an absolute shambles, cattle are on the record that have been dead for years; our highlanders were classified as Holstein, the list goes on and on .. .... What was it they were saying about poor communication ? Who was it that asked the question, "What sex is your bull?"
See also ( Adventures with the British Cattle Movement Service [BCMS] and the Rural Payments Agency - the bull was female there too.)
Nov 11 - 18 2003 ~ "The common sense in science is being replaced by nonsense,"
Indian journalist, author and critic Devinda Shawa's lecture in New Hampshire is reported in the Times Argus.
He said, "... control of the world's staple crops by a handful of multinational corporations already poses significant threats to world stability and the fight against hunger.
....an extreme example of the impact of global food trade on hunger in India was the export of the 65 million tons of grain in 2001 as cattle feed to the United States. At the same time, he said, India had to import cattle fodder to feed millions of starving Indians.
"What a remarkable development program we're in," said Shawa. "We owned food being exported to feed cattle (in America) and converted cattle feed (from America) to feed humans."
In Africa, he said attempts by American companies to deal with famine are actually making the problem worse. He said GMO grain does not reproduce, forcing poor farmers to buy new seed each year, with millions facing starvation as a result.
....
Many heirloom species of plants are also being adulterated in gene experiments, risking the diversity and health of the natural environment....
"The common sense in science is being replaced by nonsense," said Shawa. "It's going on at such a pace that even people like me are getting lost."
See also GM page
Nov 11 - 18 2003 ~ "I have never been persuaded that it was right to ban routine vaccination - I believe there was and is a strong case for it."
The Western Morning News reports that, although the Government has not yet set a date for consultation on the EU FMD Directive, Devon County Council yesterday signalled its intention to make strong representations on the new rules.
"...Senior county councillors welcomed the EU's decision to place emergency vaccination at the heart of any response to a foot and mouth outbreak.
But some questioned whether the ban on routine vaccination of livestock against the disease introduced in 1992 should be maintained.
Coun David Morrish, executive member for environment, called for a report detailing the benefits of routine and emergency vaccination to be put before councillors.
He said: "I have never been persuaded that it was right to ban routine vaccination - I believe there was and is a strong case for it."
The Devon Inquiry was the first to report and the most comprehensive and independent. It will be remembered that DEFRA's vague answers for this inquiry were finally sent, a week and a half after the inquiry had finished its hearings, following a phone call, "When do you want those responses by?"
Nov 11 - 18 2003 ~"Kill your cows privately," DEFRA suggests
The story of the Morris reactor cows continues. Following the delisting of DEFRA's application for a warrant because their skelton arguments were not ready, they have now suggested to the Morris family that they have their two reactor cows (no sign of any clinical symptoms for months since the test) privately slaughtered.
Nov 11-18 2003 ~ Mrs Beckett hints that parts of the Haskins report may not be implemented for years - if ever.
Western Morning News
".....In a devastating critique, the Labour peer Chris Haskins said the Government's "confused and over-centralised" system for dealing with rural issues frequently resulted in "unsatisfactory, wasteful outcomes".
And he warned that the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs needed a major overhaul to improve its service to rural communities.
In his long-awaited report on the future delivery of rural policy, Lord Haskins outlined sweeping changes that could affect the work of more than 3,000 staff at Defra and other agencies. And he warned that the problems were too serious to be addressed in a "piecemeal" way.
Rural Affairs Secretary Margaret Beckett welcomed Lord Haskins' report and said she accepted his analysis of the problems facing the department.
She added: "The report is compelling in its analysis of the rural delivery landscape as confusing for our customers and too bureaucratic and centralised to meet our future challenges."
But Mrs Beckett said the report should not be seen as a criticism of staff.
And although some recommendations will be acted on quickly she hinted that other parts of the report may not be implemented for years - if ever...."
Read article See also the article by Jason Groves, also in the WMN ".....Lord Haskins has the ear of Tony Blair and his findings are being viewed with great interest by the Chancellor Gordon Brown.
If Defra wants to argue that Haskins has come up with the wrong system, it will have to work sharply to come up with an alternative that could produce similar savings - or risk having it imposed on it by a Chancellor who may well see further opportunities for cost cutting in the countryside during the confusion of a major shake-up."
Nov 11 - 18 2003 ~Lord Haskins criticises Defra's functions as "confused" and "overcentralised"
and recommends that the department concentrates solely on policy and leaves its implementation to those closer to the countryside, such as regional development agencies. See Lord Haskins recommendations
See also Jobs cull urged in shake-up for Defra in the Telegraph
Nov 11 - 18 2003 ~ Following the axing of English Nature, Sir David Attenborough says that anything that diminishes an independent voice for wildlife and conservation is to be deplored
We read in the Independent
"....Margaret Beckett, the Environment Secretary, said yesterday that the new body would provide "independent policy advice", but did not confirm whether, as an non-departmental public body, it would be as independentas English Nature has been.
The announcement yesterday prompted concern from green pressure groups and conservationists, led by Sir David Attenborough, who said that an independent voice for wildlife and conservation in the English countryside was of paramount importance. "Anything that diminishes that is to be deplored," said Sir David.
Mark Avery, director of conservation for the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds. said: "Biodiversity is under tremendous pressure. Any new body built around English Nature must retain a strong independent voice."
Nov 11 - 18 2003 ~ "complacent and cowardly response is unworthy of the minister and his department"
Paul Tyler on the 180-degree U-turn on OPs, the organo-phosphorus pesticides which have seriously damaged the health of thousands of farmers as reported by Muckspreader. "We have just seen, yet again, what has become the most familiar of all rituals with our agriculture ministers: the 180-degree U-turn on OPs, the organo-phosphorus pesticides which have seriously damaged the health of thousands of farmers. The latest minister to go through the ritual dance is Ben Bradshaw . The latest minister to go through the ritual dance is Ben Bradshaw ..."...gradually an influential lobby emerged, led by the Countess of Mar, herself a victim of OP poisoning, and Lib Dem MP Paul Tyler, to argue the victims' case....one minister after another became persuaded that something nasty was going on...but each time, after being told by officials that to admit the truth would only lead to massive compensation claims, they fell strangely silent.
....One minister who followed the case made against OPs with particular care was Baroness Hayman, who soon afterwards lost her job. Another who seemed sympathetic to the evidence produced by spokesmen for the victims, such as Liz Sigmund of the OP Information Network, was Michael Meacher.
It was he who, supported by Elliott Morley, finally agreed that a high-level seminar should be held.....when Meacher lost his job, the new minister Ben Bradshaw at first seemed happy the conference should go ahead. But last month word went out that "the expense to the taxpayers and officials' time involved in holding a seminar on OPs at this time could not be justified when there is little new to say."Clearly he has been taken hostage by his civil servants" responded an angry Paul Tyler, "The lawyers are again running scared" of compensation claims against "the big chemical manufacturers and previous ministers"."We believe this complacent and cowardly response is unworthy of the minister and his department". ..
."
Read in full
Nov 11 - 18 2003 ~ Haskins recommends clarification of policy so that everyone, including DEFRA personnel, actually understands it
The first of Lord Haskins' recommendations in today's report is that: " Defra should review and clarify its rural policy remit in order to ensure that it is consistently understood by all concerned, including those who deliver its policies." The second, that delivery of Government rural policy should "operate at a regional and local level wherever possible". Haskins report
Nov 11 - 18 2003 ~" While landowners and farmers are planting trees for the 22nd century, the Government only seems to be sowing seeds for the next election"
" While we welcome Lord Haskins' efforts to
improve rural policy delivery, his proposals appear to be unnecessarily
complicated when they should be simplifying policy delivery and reducing
bureaucracy and duplication..." Responses on today's proposal to scrap English Nature and Lord Haskins review of DEFRA the CLA and from the office of the new Conservative DEFRA Shadow, Caroline Spelman
Nov 11 - 18 2003 ~ DEFRA application for warrant withdrawn
The latest news on the situation concerning the two reactor cows in Worcestershire; the Clerk of the Court has informed the Morris family that DEFRA's application for a warrant has been delisted today. An appointment for a court "slot" on Friday 31 October had already been postponed by DEFRA so that they could get together their arguments. Apparently their skeleton argument is still "not ready" yet.
The process of obtaining warrants against farmers was set up to facilitate action considered "urgent".
Nov 11 - 18 2003 ~ Pig factories are invading Poland.
The world's
largest pork production company, Smithfield Foods, is threatening the livelihood of two
million farmers. Tracy Worcester, writing in the Spectator, on how the American pork industry is invading Poland with the help of EU grants
"Everywhere this company has operated, there has
been gross environmental degradation....Why, we asked, should one of the richest
American companies receive EU-subsidised loans? ......Marek Kryder of the Animal Welfare Institute explained that although
there are laws making it illegal for foreigners to purchase former state farms,
Smithfield operates behind Polish-registered front companies so as to bypass
them."
Read in full
Nov 11 - 18 2003 ~ David Curry : DEFRA "has too large a brief, is not succeeding and has to be reformed."
The BBC today on Lord Haskins' report into "the way rural policy is run" which " is expected to be critical of overlapping agencies which waste money and fail to deliver" - this review was ordered over a year ago after pressure from David Curry.
Margaret Beckett "will not announce firm plans" today.
David Curry, chairman of the EFRA Select committee and now to be John Prescott's Shadow, has been very critical of the department as the all party report EFRA report in 2002 showed. "....It is apparent from DEFRA's own statements and from the evidence we received that significant change to the culture of the Department is far from complete - indeed it has barely begun "
Nov 3 - 10 2003 ~ It appears that the Animal Health Act was cited to the Morris family as the legal basis for the killing of their cows.
See below
As we understand it (and we wait to be corrected- please email) the use of the Animal Health Act to insist on slaughter in this case is not permissable under the terms of the act. Although full blown Mycobacterium bovis TB, i.e. clinical signs and lesions of TB in cattle, is notifiable under the Public Health Control of Disease Act 1984, merely to have an animal that reacts to the skin test is not.
If DEFRA intends to use the AHA (about which there was so much concern shown at the time) to enforce the killing of these two cows- who reacted to the skin test at least three months ago and have still not yet shown any clinical symptoms - then they must surely use parliament to add to its terms. See AHA 2002, Part 1 section 2 (3) No order may be made under this section unless a draft of the order has been laid before Parliament and approved by a resolution of each House."
).
Quite apart from the undesirability of the lack of proper veterinary input in the situation here - the slaughter of reactors, while part of a widespread system of control, is not, as we understand it, legally binding.
The bovine TB skin test is notoriously unreliable. Since DEFRA announced a year ago that a two year voluntary pilot project would be launched in an area that includes Worcestershire "to assess the effectiveness of using the gamma interferon blood test as an adjunct test " in certain herds under restrictions" ..." it would seem reasonable for the Morris' two cows to be allowed to take that test. We continue to await developments.
Nov 3 - 10 2003 ~ "Small farms in this country are disappearing at an alarming rate.. "
John Humphrys in the Sunday Times Happy cows make a big difference to our health
DEFRA ".. is developing what it calls an animal health and welfare strategy. It has set up a consultation process and the deadline for submissions has just ended. What has emerged is a clash of views that goes to the heart of how our farms should be run and how farm animals should be cared for.
Defra's chief concern is "bio- security". .....
The problem is that the agricultural regime in which most animals are born, live and die is leading in the opposite direction. It is concerned with efficiency. That means intensive production.....
"Biosecurity" ...does not address the underlying cause of disease. It is the industrialisation of agriculture. ...what is the cost of the abuse of antibiotics and the emergence of superbugs? It is incalculable.
The Curry commission ... recognised that agriculture has become "dysfunctional", mainly because it has become seriously disconnected from its market and consumers. It recommended that there should be more support for organic farming.
....
Our farm animals would benefit, too. Compassion In World Farming said recently that animal welfare is at the heart of organic husbandry methods. ..
I don't expect people who are struggling to make ends meet to pay more for their bacon or milk simply to give a pig or a cow a better life. But many of us can afford to. Nor do I expect our politicians to decree that farming practices must change overnight. But it would help if the welfare of animals and the future of organic farming were seen as two elements in a bigger issue. " Read in full
Nov 3 - 10 2003 ~ Ministers are this weekend trying to back away from abolishing England's official independent wildlife watchdog
in the face of a fierce public outcry The Independent on Sunday
But they are up against strong resistance from senior civil servants who are determined to bring English Nature - which has frequently proved to be a thorn in their flesh - under government control.....In manoeuvres that recalled the worst days of the little-lamented Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Maff), which preceded Defra, civil servants are pressing for a new body to be set up under special legislation. Such a move would paralyse the watchdogs for years by throwing them into a legal limbo.
"It shows that Defra is up to Maff's old tricks" said Tom Burke, a former adviser to the Deputy Prime Minister, John Prescott, who is now a member of the council of English Nature. "It shows that nothing has changed."
Nov 3 - 10 2003 ~ Sir Peter O'Sullevan wants to stop the horse export ban from being lifted
Former racing commentator Sir Peter O'Sullevan has taken up a campaign to stop a ban from being lifted on the trafficking overseas of horses from Britain for slaughter. See link O'Sullevan has asked readers of Thoroughbred Times to sign either the International League for the Protection of Horses petition (new window) or e-mail Compassion in World Farming, or contact Margaret Beckett, (ILPH's example letter) secretary of state for the Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, to prevent the slaughter from becoming a reality once again.
Nov 3 - 10 2003 ~Export of horses: Lord Whitty "My Lords, the Government share the concerns that many people have about the welfare of horses..We are reviewing the options..."
Lords debate Nov 3rd
Lord Pearson of Rannoch: My Lords, the noble Lord can share all the concerns of my noble friend Lord Higgins as much as he likes and the Government can review all the options available as much as they like, b ut will he confirm that this is an area that has been handed irrevocably to the qualified majority vote in Brussels? There is absolutely nothing we can do about it if we are outvoted. If the corrupt octopus in Brussels wishes to proceed in the way it intends, we have nothing more to say.
Baroness Byford, said horse passports would do nothing to help.
She told the Western Morning News that Lord Whitty's response to the concerns about live exports had been "totally inadequate".
Nov 3 - 10 2003 ~ Legal intimidation, use of the Animal "Health" Bill to force slaughter
Nicola
Morris' two reactor cows have been in question for several months - and because she and her husband questioned the test (see below) the rest of the herd has been refused testing. Nor has she been permitted a second test - even at her own expense. As she says, she would not oppose the putting down of the cows if she thought they were really infected - but she simply does not believe they are. She and her husband Andy merely want to have the positive result confirmed by another test such as the gamma interferon test (see below). There seemed to be no movement on this issue - until an article about it appeared in a Birmingham newspaper (no link available), when Trading Standards officers were sent the very next day to slaughter the cows - and cited the Animal Health Act for their legal justification.
As in the panicky days of FMD it is the blank faced tone of these officials this is so frightening and so very "unEnglish". No lessons learned there, it appears.
The Morris'
local magistrate, having listened to Nicola's concerns, did not grant DEFRA a warrant and it now seems as though another legal wrangle - of which we thought we had seen the last - is set for next Thursday. More news as we receive it. It is difficult to believe that DEFRA can really be aware of the full facts or they would surely allow the two cows to be tested again at the Morris' expense and save the taxpayer the cost of a court hearing.
Nov 3 - 10 2003 ~ BSE: Mr Lidington asks why Prof Ebringer's research grant was stopped
(27th October)
Mr. Lidington: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if she will make a statement about the reasons for the Government's decision to discontinue financial support for Professor Alan Ebringer's research into BSE. [132673]
Margaret Beckett: The proposal submitted by Professor Ebringer for Defra funding was assessed according to procedures that follow both departmental and Office of Science and Technology current recommendations for the evaluation and commissioning of research. This assessment, together with opinion from SEAC, advises that the proposed nature and scope of the work are not recommended for funding by Defra. Professor Ebringer has been advised of reviewers comments and has held discussions with Departmental officials. "
Or.."DEFRA and SEAC didn't like his research so we took the money away"?
Nov 3 - 10 2003 ~ We will all have enough to eat if we stick to the good, old-fashioned craft of farming.
We don't need advanced science, still less the big corporations, argues Colin Tudge in this article in the New Statesman It was Colin Tudge who pointed out that the rot truly set in in the early 1970s, when a government report chaired by Lord Rothschild proposed the "customer-contractor" principle. " Increasingly, scientific research is paid for by private enterprise, which in practice means big business. Big business promotes the kind of scientific research that will provide the kind of technologies that can underpin the most profitable modus operandi. The most profitable modus operandi in agriculture is industrialisation.." See more
Nov 3 - 10 2003 ~ Ninth case of BSE in Japan
"Experts are puzzled as to how the infection occurred, since the latest 2
animals were born after Japan banned the use of meat-and-bone meal (MBM)
feed in October 2001..." (ProMed)
Nov 3 - 10 2003 ~ Bovine Gamma Interferon Test
(see animation in new window) Elliot Morley agreed in February to implement the gamma interferon TB test if it could be shown to have "clear benefits" in controlling bovine TB. The NFBG warned in this press release that DEFRA's research into the test lacked the clarity needed to prove those benefits. "...DEFRA has ignored the recommendations of its own Independent Scientific Group (ISG) on how the research should best be conducted.....
We believe that DEFRA should heed the advice of the ISG and not ignore best practice. The ISG's gamma interferon trial would cost an extra £1m. It is a disgrace that DEFRA will happily shell out almost £600,000 to look at how often badgers go into farm buildings [5] but it will not spend a small amount more on research that will answer major questions about long term TB control strategy."
Nov 3 - 10 2003 ~ Badgers, cattle and the reality of a control and elimination programme for TB
The Independent article (Wed) Cull of badgers is spreading bovine TB, not stopping it and the abandonment of half of the controversial culling trials (which have cost the country £25 million) shows that something new must be tried. Ben Bradshaw's mantra is yet more "bio-security" and testing of cattle before they are moved - but farmers know that this does not work. ( "Farmers are entitled to feel seriously let down when they realise that not only is Defra's bio-security advice totally flawed, Defra has the research which tells them it is..." testing is ".. worse than FMD. It is relentless, demoralising and expensive. Each test is Russian Roulette for cattle... " See warmwell article by a a UK farmer)
Something new is urgently needed. Is not
virologist Ruth Watkins' suggestion a possible and elegant solution? "...
Dr Doherty from the Staatens Institute in Denmark that manufactures BCG and PPD, a purified protein derivative... has worked on human and animal infection with Mycobacterium bovis. Badgers can be immunised orally with BCG, they love chocolate so Dr Doherty suggested they could be given chocolate containing BCG, "badger chocolates". Cattle can also be immunised, more practically by subcutaneous inoculation as in humans - it will cause an ulcer at the inoculation site in them as it does in us. The immunity is at least partially protective..."
Read whole article
Nov 3 - 10 2003 ~ "A blizzard of crazy regulations is threatening the countryside's future"
Magnus Linklater in the Times Farmers are harvesting a bumper crop of red tape
"...resentment stems from a belief that alien rules are being imposed by officials who know little about the realities of rural life and who do not, in any case, much care for them. A blizzard of regulations, from Brussels and from Whitehall, has enveloped farmers in the aftermath of BSE and foot-and-mouth. Lord Haskins, who was commissioned by the Government to report on the rural economy in the wake of the 2001 foot-and-mouth outbreak, found that red tape was the No1 source of complaint.
Farmers, he wrote, were "seriously impaired by the existence of a plethora of publicly funded agencies and programmes with little effective co-ordination or integration". He is about to issue a follow-up report on ways to simplify the structure of countryside quangos.
It is not just the weight of officialdom that enrages farmers, it is the craziness that goes with it....what is looming is the promise, not of less regulation, but more. ..."
Nov 3 - 10 2003 ~ "This International Conference will be based on the valuable experience gained in the control and eradication of foot and mouth disease and other significant animal diseases and zoonoses through the use of vaccination
.... an opportunity for the exchange of the latest scientific information at the global level that will, at the same time, assist in the evaluation and improvement of the current standards and guidelines for better control of infectious animal diseases.
.......
It is expected that all Member Countries will benefit from this International Conference, so I look forward to welcoming you in Buenos Aires." Bernard Vallet.
The International Conference on the Control of Infectious Animal Diseases by Vaccination, organised by the OIE, is to be held in Buenos Aires, Argentina, 13-16 April, 2004.
Objectives of the Conference
- Experience gained in the control and eradication of foot and mouth disease and other animal and zoonotic diseases through the use of vaccination when appropriate.
- Current methods of vaccination
- New and future trends in the control of diseases by vaccination
- Impact on international regulations and trade
Session titles include: "Foot and mouth disease control using vaccination",
"Making a vaccination to live policy a reality" and "Antigen and vaccine banks as a safety measure for insuring control of disease spread". Read more
Nov 3 - 10 2003 ~ "..let the Government publish Lord Haskins' report now, instead of giving secret and selective briefings
says David Lidington in this press release.
"I am alarmed by reports that Ministers want to abolish English Nature's role as a source of independent scientific advice and a watchdog for wildlife and biodiversity....English Nature spoke out against the present Government's rush to approve GM crops. It gave trenchant evidence to the ODPM Select Committee, criticising John Prescott's housing plans.
I fear that Ministers may use a departmental shake-up to neuter an inconvenient critic whose advice sometimes gets in the way of spin.
If there is nothing to worry about, let the Government publish Lord Haskins' report now, instead of giving secret and selective briefings."
Nov 3 - 10 2003 ~ Mrs Beckett favours yet more more centralisation
The abolition of Countryside Agency, English Nature and the Forestry Commission could leave the countryside unprotected.
"The idea of fusing them into a single land management agency is the brainchild of the environment secretary, Margaret Beckett..." Guardian
"Realising that she is riding into a political storm, she has called the heads of the relevant groups at short notice to a meeting in London today."
It seems that this is Mrs Beckett's alternative to Lord Haskins' wish to devolve DEFRA's power "... Lord Haskins, head of the environment department's rural delivery review, who also wants sweeping changes in how the three agencies are run. But the Guardian has learned that he wants much of the spending power of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) devolved to the regions"
Nov 3 - 10 2003 ~ Nicola Morris threatened with arrest over TB slaughter resistance
"What appalls me is the vet dealing with the case has not asked to look at the animals once. We got our own vet to do a detailed examination and she said there was nothing that leads her to believe the animals are suffering from TB"
From the This is Worcester website TB Showdown at Eatons Farm "Nicola and Andy Morris defied a Government culling squad this morning and ordered officials off their land.
...
Government officials have ordered two cows from the 60-strong herd to be killed because a test shows they are harbouring the TB virus.
But Mr and Mrs Morris claim the cows have shown no sign of disease.
...... Nicola - who famously resisted a Defra slaughter during the foot-and-mouth crisis - would not budge. They were cautioned and told they would be reported to the police for obstruction. The officials are now seeking a warrant for their arrest."
It will be remembered that Mrs Morris presented a careful and reasoned analysis at the time of the FMD inquiry which, although it was never hostile or condemning, may have been very unwelcome to DEFRA and the government.
Extract: "Of the premises culled as a precaution (pre-emptive cull) less than 10 % were tested. DEFRA are of the opinion that a significant number of these farms were incubating the disease at slaughter; this is unlikely. For 3 reasons ...(Read more)
Nov 3 - 10 2003 ~ Scrapie - new compulsory EU measures
DEFRA consultation(pdf) "...There is also the question of what penalties to apply if checks reveal that adult sheep or
progeny are not of the genotype expected of that level.. ..."
The current concern about scrapie and its attendant massive expenditure amd bureaucracy rests on two assumptions that have never been scientifically proved: that scrapie can mask BSE in sheep - (Millions of pounds in research projects have failed to discover BSE in sheep except in laboratories when their brains have been injected) and that BSE infected meat is the suspected cause of vCJD in humans. Moreover, UK meat and bone meal was shipped to Saudi Arabia, Libya, India and other third world countries during 70s, 80s, 90s as feed but there has been no single case of BSE in their cattle. This suggests that the assumption that BSE is caused by infected MBM is also highly suspect.
Last September, Rare Breeds International raised some important issues: "...the development of tests to identify the presence of scrapie, and to distinguish between BSE and scrapie, should be developed as rapidly as possible and that substantial Government aid should be given to research in this field.
..
It is important to establish a balance between the original objectives of NSP, and the need to accommodate the security of individual breeds and the importance of biodiversity. Breeds which have a low or nil frequency of ARR have other qualities which are important in the British sheep industry." Read more
Nov 3 - 10 2003 ~ "unnecessarily onerous and unreasonably draconian.... It has nothing to do with food safety or animal welfare. "
"Late BCMS Applications may cost £65 million" from eblex.org
And a letter from a West Country farmer: "BCMS seem to have found another way of persecuting cattle keepers ...
I haven't heard a word of protest from any farmer organisation. Why do we carry on accepting and co-operating with this sort of rubbish?
..."
The email is attached to a letter to the farmer's MP
"...The likely effects of this absurd regime will be that cattle keepers will routinely falsify the birth dates of their calves to suit the date of the application ...
This all seems thoroughly unreasonable and unnecessary. It has nothing to do with food safety or animal welfare. Neither will it save administrative time: because apart from the angry appeals and disputes likely to be provoked, the new "passport refused" documents will require additional licences and procedures.
Surely it must be recognised that, just like BCMS itself, cattle keepers can make honest mistakes - and a procedure for rectifying these must be provided. ..."
Nov 3 - 10 2003 ~ Mark Purdey is speaking on his research at Penrith Rugby club on Saturday 15th November at I.30 pm.
A rare opportunity to hear him speak in the North of England.
Admission free.
A raffle will be held. ( Mark Purdey page on warmwell)
Oct 19 - 27 2003 ~"... This is how the supermarkets can keep the price down - because other EU countries are awash with milk, produced less efficiently by farmers who receive much more financial help from their governments"
Booker's Notebook in the Sunday Telegraph says, "The real reason for the disaster engulfing Britain's dairy farmers is not what Mr Blair called the "armlock" of the supermarkets. It is the fact that the EU system creates that obscene surplus. And the UK Government does nothing to protect our dairy farmers - the most efficient in Europe - from the consequences of that glut, so that more than 2,000 of them every year go out of business." Read in full
Oct 19 - 27 ~ Heading for Showdown on FMD Clean-up Bills
"...we got what we were expecting in that Defra didn't answer the questions we posed"
(Rick Hopkins, spokesman for the FPB in the South West) The Western Morning News reports the meeting, described as "tense", between Members of the Forum for Private Business (FPB see below) and "high-ranking Defra officials" "....the FPB is ramping up the pressure on the department and is set to quiz Mr Bradshaw, Labour MP for Exeter, on the issue at a meeting later this month. Any Westcountry farmers or contractors still owed money by Defra can join the campaign at www.fpb.co.uk"
So far, five companies are taking DEFRA to the High Court over unpaid contracts. A spokeswoman for Defra is reported in the article as saying that the amount outstanding was "nothing like" the £50 million quoted by the FPB.
"The ones that haven't been paid are ones we have been disputing," she said.
Oct 19 - 27 ~ The shortcomings of foot and mouth 2001 should not be blamed on the regrettable decline in farm animal vets. Communication is still "poor"
The Scotsman article Ten-year plan to curb diseases reporting that "a new hi-tech approach to animal health disease surveillance linking veterinary surgeons, farmers and the government was unveiled by the government’s chief veterinary officer Jim Scudamore yesterday" also mentions the
"hard-hitting report by a Commons committee" adding " ....Scottish Executive has admitted that communication with both the media and farmers about the slaughter this week of almost 300 cattle at Townhead, Dolphinton, to control bovine TB was poor.
The real case of disease control and communication came only weeks after a simulated FMD outbreak exercise by the Executive was claimed as a success. ..."
In a Times article on December 27th 2001 Vet shortage 'made slaughter worse' Mr Scudamore ".. accepted that there had been a problem with the presentation of the contiguous cull. "
He was reported to have said: “We simply ran out of vets. In Cumbria I would have needed a vet to visit the same farm perhaps up to five times a day.” This is at variance with the view of Peter Jinman's evidence to the EFRA committee (see below): " ..I would stress that one of the problems during the foot and mouth outbreak was not the lack of vets. It was the lack of manpower control. It was management that was lacking. ...."
The December 2001 article reported that Mr Scudamore would "work closely with the nation’s vets to ensure that the Government has a panel of experts to call up in any emergency..."
Oct 19 - 27 ~ the "Expert Group" referred to in Section 78 of the Directive: will it
include international expertise in foot and mouth disease diagnosis,
vaccination and relevant new technologies?
A Parliamentary Question from Lord Plumb "What steps have been taken towards meeting the requirements in the
European Union foot and mouth disease Directive to create "a permanently
operational expert group to maintain expertise and assist the relevant
authority in qualitative disease preparation"; whether the composition will
include international expertise in foot and mouth disease diagnosis,
vaccination and relevant new technologies; and whether appointments will be
undertaken in an open and transparent manner.[HL4398]" received the answer from Lord Whitty:
"The Government already have in place arrangements to call on
expertise on disease control in the event of an outbreak... "
but his answer failed to make clear who would be in the Expert group, their level of veterinary expertise or relevant experience with foot and mouth disease. Indeed, Lord Whitty entirely avoided giving an answer to the question of "whether the composition will
include international expertise in foot and mouth disease diagnosis,
vaccination and relevant new technologies"
Oct 19 - 27 ~ Commons Rural Affairs Committee raises serious concerns about the declining number of vets specialising in the welfare of farmyard animals.
The EFRA report on Vets and Veterinary Services (pdf file in new window) is published Oct 23.
During evidence collected at the EFRA Select Committee in May Paddy Tipping had asked Peter Jinman (President RCVS) whether there were "public good issues that need to be paid for in some way by the government"? Mr Jinman replied that " maybe part of ...modulation should be cost compliance and involvement in animal welfare, which is the suggestion within the EU rules. ....I would stress that one of the problems during the foot and mouth outbreak was not the lack of vets. It was the lack of manpower control. It was management that was lacking. ...."
Carl Padgett, Honorary Secretary of the British Cattle Veterinary Association added, ".... It is the management that we really need to get sorted out. There were many vets inappropriately used and that to a degree disenchanted many of the veterinary surgeons in practice.
.... farmers have identified that they find the veterinary surgeon the most valuable source of veterinary advice and also will take certain advice regarding notifiable diseases and disease control from their veterinary surgeon over and above taking it from DEFRA. They can talk around the subject. They trust that person. ." See also the report in today's Western Morning News Ministers must act to save Rural Vets
Oct 19 - 27 ~ Clarification about culling and vaccination is urgently needed
as can be seen from the letter below from the NFU National Livestock Committee Chairman, Richard Haddock. The EU Directive on FMD (October 03):
- Paragraph 23 "It is necessary to prevent any spread of the disease as soon as an outbreak occurs by carefully
monitoring movements of animals and the use of products liable to be contaminated, and
where appropriate, in particular in densely populated livestock areas, by emergency
vaccination."
- Para 24 - ".....international and Community rules and the ensuing
practices have not taken sufficient account of the possibility offered by the use of emergency
vaccination and subsequent tests to detect infected animals in a vaccinated population. Too
much importance was attached to the trade-policy aspects, with the result that protective
vaccination was not carried out even when it had been authorised.."
- Para 25 - "...In the event of an
epidemic, the choice of strategy to control the disease should likewise take account of which
strategy causes the least possible economic damage for non-agricultural sectors of the
economy."
- Para 26 - " By means of emergency vaccination without subsequent killing of the vaccinated animals the
number of animals to be killed for disease control purposes may be reduced significantly.
Appropriate testing should thereafter substantiate the absence of infection."
The UK will find it difficult not to use vaccination any future outbreak. The EU will definitely not underwrite compensation for mass slaughter again (and, as we have seen below, are unlikely to compensate the UK for 2001, leaving the deficit of over a billion to be met by UK taxes.)
Oct 19 - 27 ~ " The issues surrounding culling and vaccination must be cleared up beyond any doubt before, heaven forbid, we are ever hit again by this dreadful disease."
A letter from Richard Haddock to the WMN is interesting. Mr Haddock agreed with the NFU stance on vaccination in 2001. He now appears to recognise that before the NFU will even contemplate vaccination there are answers urgently needed "... extremely concerned about the application of the policy which failed to take into account the circumstances on the ground such as livestock being physically separated by, in many cases, long distances and "buffer zones" like woods etc. As a result, many animals were indeed slaughtered unnecessarily.
As far as vaccination was concerned, we were never given any answers as to the consequences of going that route by either the Government or the big retailers. .... The issues surrounding culling and vaccination must be cleared up beyond any doubt before, heaven forbid, we are ever hit again by this dreadful disease."
Read in full
Oct 19 - 27 ~ EFRA Select Committee urged by RCVS to question claims that the " mathematically justified
contiguous cull" brought FMD under control in 2001
In a letter to the Veterinary Record this week, Dr Alex Donaldson writes, ".....colleagues and I at Pirbright voiced our concern about the 48-hour contiguous cull policy and proposed that the benefits claimed for the strategy would have to be weighed against the burden of disposing of hundreds of thousands of carcases, the likelihood that many of the contiguous premises were not infected and the consequences of diverting scarce veterinary resources and support staff from other disease control activities ...Several correspondents called for an independent investigation.
The letter from Bob Michell ( VR, April 12, p 479) records that earlier this year the RCVS Council agreed to draw to the attention of the House of Commons Select Committee on the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs the need to seek expert appraisal of the claim that the mathematically justified contiguous cull was the factor that brought the 2001 epidemic under control. Our profession should encourage the RCVS Council to continue to press the select committee to oversee the task of investigating that claim and the merits - or otherwise - of the contiguous cull policy.
."
Read the letter
Last year, when giving evidence to the European Parliament inquiry into foot and mouth, Dr Donaldson had said that although he had gone along with the controversial policy in areas where there was a need to "catch up" with the disease, it had been continued for far too long.
"There was no justification for the 3km or the contiguous cull, which were both novel and untested, once the resources were available to go back to traditional culling and disease control methods." See article in the Western Morning News on 20/6/02
Oct 19 - 27 ~ "If the government actually owned up and said that they can't afford to pay now, at least the banks could then arrange to help with companies' cash flow problems."
" Foot and Mouth crisis still lingers on in the South West
Two years on from the Foot and Mouth crisis and many of the contractors in the south west that helped with the clean-up are still waiting to be paid by the Government........ Many of the businesses with outstanding monies owed by Defra are literally fighting for their survival and the protracted negotiations that are taking place between them and Defra are pushing many perilously close to the edge..."
A press release issued by the Forum of Private Business (FPB)
was distributed to the South West media list on October 20th. Within 5 minutes, BBC Radio Cornwall called for a live interview at 0720 tomorrow, 21 October
Oct 19 - 27 ~"Why they are asking all horse and pony owners to apply for horse passports when the required statutory instrument has neither been laid before, nor approved by, Parliament?"
To read the short debate:
Viscount Astor asked Her Majesty's Government on 16th Oct 2003:
Why they are asking all horse and pony owners to apply for horse passports when the required statutory instrument has neither been laid before, nor approved by, Parliament?
Horse and Hound this week gives details of horse passports in other countries.
"...... countries which have legislation have no penalties for non-compliance but the UK has written in swinging penalties for an owner without a passport, up to £5000 for 1-10 horses, up to £1000 per horse for more than 10 horses. The latter category would include riding schools - some are still saying they will not buy them."
Oct 19 - 27 ~ U.S. Issues New Rules to Protect National Food Supply: meanwhile, DEFRA's dogs are sniffing - but without conviction
See http://usinfo.state.gov/topical/pol/terror/texts/03100921.htm
".......The first regulation requires food importers to provide the FDA with advance notice of human and animal food shipments imported or offered for import on or after Dec. 12, 2003. .... FDA will have for the first time a complete roster of foreign and domestic food facilities. The requirements will enable the FDA to quickly identify and locate affected food processors and other establishments in the event of deliberate or accidental contamination of food. ....."
Here in the somewhat less vigilant UK, Lord Whitty, in answer to Lord Rotherwick in February, said "The two dogs have been operational most of the time and both have never been out of action at any one time." (in other words, there was always one, even when the other was indisposed)
Lord Rotherwick asked Lord Whitty to acknowledge ".. that the solutions in the DEFRA action pack produced in March 2002 - nearly a year ago - have largely fallen flat on their face? There are no amnesty bins; the wording on the landing cards has yet to be agreed; the service agreement between DEFRA and Customs and Excise has yet to be implemented; and there has been a pitiful number of arrests of people bringing in illegal meat. Have not the Government largely failed in their policy on this matter?"
On October 5th 2003 Lord Rotherwick asked Her Majesty's Government:
How many convictions for the smuggling of illegal meat have been recorded on the central database of HM Customs and Excise since 11 April.[HL4412]
Lord McIntosh of Haringey: None of Customs' seizures of illegal meat since 11 April 2003 have resulted in convictions being recorded on its central database.
Oct 19 - 27 ~"The Commission confirmed that it cannot contribute to the cost of destroying eight million healthy animals under the "pre-emptive cull" scheme, because compensation can only legally be paid for the slaughter of infected animals.. "
Booker's Notebook in the Sunday Telegraph." EC welches on farmers' bribe
Gordon Brown's sums were thrown into further disarray last week when it was reported from Brussels that the European Commission is likely to withhold £700 million claimed by the British Government towards the cost of the 2001 foot and mouth epidemic.
The Commission confirmed that it cannot contribute to the cost of destroying eight million healthy animals under the "pre-emptive cull" scheme, because compensation can only legally be paid for the slaughter of infected animals. It also claims the sums paid to farmers were excessive anyway.
What the reports did not point out was that the pre-emptive cull policy was initially "recommended" by officials of the Commission's own Food and Veterinary Office when they visited Britain between March 12 and 16, 2001, even though the culling of healthy, unexposed animals was unlawful.
The chief reason why ministry officials were willing to pay over the odds was that they thought this was the only way to persuade farmers to accept a policy the illegality of which was recently confirmed in a paper by two Cardiff University law professors.
In other words, the Commission is now refusing to pay for a policy launched to comply with the instructions of its own officials; and which could only be implemented by bribing farmers with the money it is now threatening to withhold. Thus do the crimes of Mr Blair's ministers come back to haunt them; except that it is we the taxpayers who must foot the bill."
Oct 19 - 27 ~"The conclusion I have drawn from analysis of the 2001 FMD epidemic, is that indeed an effective animal disease strategy is dependent on frequent objective review
and the allocation of appropriate resources to carry out that strategy, as has been similarly recognised by the requirement that Parliament review the Contingency Plans annually.... The challenge now will remain in ensuring that the plethora of other recommendations are carried out, that further needed research (particularly with regard to the "Carrier" state), and seminars (especially on modern vaccines, NSP-tests and Rapid--Diagnostic Technology) take place ..." Christopher Stockdale, farmer and DEFRA stakeholder, has permitted his dissertation on the FMD crisis of 2001 to appear on warmwell. (He would welcome comments or criticism. His email address is at the end of the paper.)
Oct 13 - 19 ~ ~ EU Compromise over sheep ID plan
FWi " Instead of double tagging, farmers will only have to apply a single ear tag bearing a unique identification code.
A second means of ID will also be required, though this may take the form of a tattoo, an ear tag or an electronic identifier.
The new text also does away with the need to record each individual animal on a movement document, replacing it with a batch system."
Oct 13 - 19 ~"What if they had been questioned on FMD?"
Western Morning News .... the Hutton Inquiry has also shown that those decisions have always left a trail, whether in paper form or by e-mail.
Whether it was Tony Blair's spokesman describing the "game of chicken" with the BBC, or his chief of staff gently pointing out that the Iraq dossier did not show Saddam Hussein was a current threat, the Hutton process has shown that almost everything is written down.
Was it really true that none of the key conversations and decisions were written down during the foot and mouth crisis? Or was it that the less open nature of the inquiry made it possible to keep those potentially damaging details secret?
Without a proper inquiry - and we will not get one now - we will never be sure. But the sheer weight of correspondence unearthed by the Hutton Inquiry suggests that Whitehall computers were almost certainly buzzing with e-mails about the election, the culling policy, the ghastly pyres and so on - with Downing Street taking the lead...." Read in full
Oct 13 - 19 ~ Fresh Calls for Foot and Mouth Inquiry
Western Morning News "... Shadow Rural Affairs Secretary David Lidington said he would be challenging the Government over the revelations.
He said: "I shall certainly be putting down questions to Margaret Beckett about this. Ministers should hang their heads in shame because it looks as though their incompetence is going to land British taxpayers with a far bigger bill than expected. That money, which the UK could have expected, will have to be found from other budgets, whether it be health, schools or the police."
Graham Booth, South West Euro-MP for the UK Independence Party, said the concerns in Brussels reinforced calls for a public inquiry...."It is not too late for a public inquiry into why we ignored the sound advice from previous outbreaks of foot and mouth," he said. "Now Europe is coming back to us and saying that because of the way the Government handled things we are going to suffer to the tune of £1 billion."
Oct 13 -19 ~ Contingency Plans should be made public
National Farmers' Union spokesman Ian Johnson said the Government needed to make public its contingency plans for another outbreak. "Foot and mouth has a dreadful habit of coming back. What will the Government do if that happens? It's good that Ash Moor is being restored but what lessons have been learned? ..." WMN article on the continuing worry about Ashmoor Pit in Devon
Oct 13- 19 ~ Telegraph: "Foot and mouth farce could cost £1 billion"
News in Brief
"The Government's mishandling of the foot and mouth crisis could cost Britain up to £1.1 billion in lost European compensation payments.
The European Commission is balking at paying its 60 per cent share of the Government's £3 billion foot and mouth costs because it has misgivings over how the Government handled compensation payments and the contiguous cull. Ministers have tabled a claim for compensation that says £1.46 billion was paid to farmers for destroying livestock and £1.5 billion was spent on animal disposal and cleaning up farms.
Sources in Brussels say the Commission is reluctant to pay any more than £250 million towards compensation and no more than £300 million for cleaning up, leaving £1.1 billion unpaid."
Oct 13 - 19 ~ EU Commission is considering capping the UK's total final FMD payment "grave concerns about the controversial contiguous cull policy"..."
at just £250 million - almost £700 million less than is being sought. The Western Morning News (Wednesday 15 Oct) £700 million Fiasco "...The European Commission is thought to have grave concerns about the controversial contiguous cull policy, which led to the slaughter of millions of healthy animals. Under European rules, compensation is only payable to farmers whose animals are thought to have been exposed to the disease.
...The revelations are likely to reopen the row over the Government's handling of the crisis at a time when ministers were hoping finally to draw a line under the affair.
......."
(But see also warmwell's legality page) Read the WMN report in full
Oct 13 - 19 ~ ""lasting mistrust" between communities in Cumbria and the government, over the handling of the foot-and-mouth epidemic"
The BBC reports ongoing research led by the former Director of Public Health for North Cumbria, Peter Tiplady. A final report of the researchers findings in Cumbria to be submitted to the government, local authorities and other agencies, will recommend the creation of "citizen panels" in the event of a similar disaster. Dr Tiplady is quoted by the BBC as saying: "....."There was a very serious lack of understanding as what effect this was having on people.
We have discovered in talking to the people who were affected by the outbreak, just how much they could have contributed to the recovery process
We found an almost complete breakdown of trust between people in the affected areas and statutory agencies.
Our research has been going on for over a year and this mistrust is still there and is still very deep.
Without trust in the people who are supposed to be helping you, recovery is that much more difficult."
See also this report from the Cumberland News on 28th June 2002 in which Dr Tiplady spoke about links between FMD pyres & illness. Dr Tiplady made his decision to stop pyres several weeks before the Department of Health released guidance on how and where the pyres should be lit.
“This guidance was released far too late, and I believe that was done for political reasons," he said.
Oct 13 - 19 ~"DEFRA and its Scottish equivalent should remember that if they do not get their houses in order regarding FMD then the EU has taken the power to do it for them."
The LandCare.org site carries an important article by its author, James Irvine FRSE DSc FRCPEd FRCPath FInstBiol
"FMD simulation exercise in Scotland:
Lessons are still to learned" This extract, towards the end of the article:
" it was alleged that final confirmation of the viral strain involved could take some 14 days - far too long for any vaccination programme to be effective. It could be that this is a misunderstanding and the time interval would in fact be much less. However, the fact that such a time scale was being mentioned at all indicates the great need for much better communication and education about how a new outbreadk of FMD would be handled.
It would appear that the application of long-established science to the rapid diagnosis of FMD and the ability to distinguish between naturally infected animals and vaccinated ones in terms of FMD has still not been applied to any future outbreak within the UK (although it has elsewhere).
A search of the State Veterinary Service (Scotland) website makes no reference to the exercise. Direct inquiry to the Press Office of the Scottish Executive confirmed that no further information other than that contained in the newspaper article referred to above is available, but that a report will be published on future strategy sometime in the future. .....
State Veterinary Service has a long way to go and not a lot of time to get there...."
Read in full (external link to Land-Care.org article)
Oct 13 - 19 ~ "I have never been offered funding by the UK government or anybody from the
UK in fact."
Mark Purdey "...... I would like to take this opportunity to correct some disinformation by DEFRA officials whenever the issue of
government funding of my research has been raised at public meetings. For
instance, it was publicly stated by Mike Dawson of DEFRA on August 28th at Penrith
that I had been offered funding but I had turned it down. This is completely
untrue. I have never been offered funding by the UK government or anybody from the
UK in fact. My applications for funding to the UK government have only ever
been rejected and then subsequently plagiarized by the 'quango' peer reviewers
who they had appointed."
Read more about Mark Purdey's work".. I have pinpointed a clear cut correlation with
the excessive levels of two toxic metals in the soils / vegetation ( and their
radioactive emissions) that I collected from the farm where the BSE cow
was raised and the CWD affected deer farms, etc, in Alberta / Saskatchewan and
the other TSE hotspot zones...It's all so obvious what is causing this BSE problem when you get out there
into the real environment and derive some first hand experience of the cluster
areas and look for those common toxic denominators- that's why it is
driving me
crazy having to listen to the world's media going on about this
hyperinfectious myth every day of the week."
Oct 6 - 13 ~"exposure to high intensities of both naturally occurring and man made radioactive metals seems to explain the emergence of every cluster of TSE that has reared its ugly head around the world"
Mark Purdey's latest work on the 'free radical' legacy of radioactive metal contamination can be seen on his own website MarkPurdey.com "During the 60s/ 70s, it seems that the entire operation of the Fort Collins wildlife facility was geared towards a raft of radiation experiments - including the direct injection of strontium 90 and caesium 134 into the deer - in order to monitor the biological effects of these potentially lethal ‘cold war' compounds (25)(26).
....
... later I stumbled upon a study by Dr Randolph Crom on a small cluster of CJD amongst the workforce engaged in the assembly of missiles at the former Hughes Missile Plant at Tucson in Arizona (39).... CWD has erupted in deer grazing across the copper deficient White Sands missile range in the New Mexico desert, the tundra terrain of NATO's Cold Lake air weapons range and the tank shelling range at Camp Wainwright in the Sandhills on the Alberta/Saskatchewan borders ...
...it seems likely that the UK's BSE and vCJD epidemics were caused by the simultaneous exposure of cattle, cats, humans and zoo animals to a toxic combination of factors - the widely used copper-chelating organo dithiophosphate (OP) insecticides (35) and the fall out of radioactive metals from the Chernobyl eruption (20).
During the 1980s British cattle herds and humans were exposed to exclusively high doses of these insecticides for warble fly and head lice control respectively (42), whereupon the prion proteins of the OP treated animals were starved of their copper co partners (35). This rendered the prion protein vulnerable to binding up with certain rogue replacement metals, such as the radioactive strontium 90, which were rained down at high concentrations onto the soils of NW Europe after the Chernobyl accident (20) - the precise region that later became the world's most intensive hotspot of BSE."
The fully referenced article (link mended - apologies) concludes with a swipe at corporations and government who lay the blame for "pollutant induced modern day ailments onto an assortment of genetic weaknesses, viruses, naturally occurring toxins, or - as in the case of BSE- the sheep scrapie agent."
Oct 6 - 13 ~ How GM crop trials were rigged ".. the GM trials, whose results will be reported on Thursday, were always more political than scientific"
Ministers knew of the environmental dangers, but the tests were designed not to focus on this. Geoffrey Lean reports
in the Independent on Sunday
" .....
.....EU's ban on atrazine, the weedkiller used on conventional maize..... invalidates the tests, because they no longer reflect the real conditions under which crops will be grown. Unless they carry out new trials with an alternative to atrazine, ministers cannot claim that growing GM maize is safe...."
Read in full on GM page
See also in the Independent on Sunday Farmers can set up GM free zones
"... Franz Fischler, rejected calls for exclusion zones to be set up. But late last month he told EU farming ministers in Brussels that he now favoured setting up voluntary zones.
This would allow farmers, businesses and councils in an area to agree to declare themselves "GM-free", but they could also agree to set up "bio zones", where modified crops would be planted. "
Oct 6 - 13 ~ significant "irregularities" in our Government's handling of the crisis
On 25th November 2001, Christopher Booker wrote:
"In August the European Commission suspended its compensation payments to the British Government, after an investigation by the EU's Food and Veterinary Office.
This found significant "irregularities" in our Government's handling of the crisis, not least in paying farmers up to four times the market value of their stock to buy their acquiescence in allowing destruction of healthy animals under the legally-dubious "contiguous cull" scheme. The Commission not only set up an audit of these payments but launched an investigation by Olaf, its anti-fraud unit."
(Read in full about how DEFRA asked farmers to concoct records of the foot and mouth epidemic of the effects on their herds to give a misleading impression to the European Commission)
It is interesting, therefore, to note that Ben Bradshaw announced on September 15th 2003 that "Further amounts will only be paid following completion of Commission audits of expenditure incurred during the disease outbreaks" (See below)
Oct 6 - 13 ~ only £217 million of a possible £948.6 million compensation for FMD losses paid to UK by EU
"Further amounts will only be paid following completion of Commission audits of expenditure incurred during the disease outbreaks."
More than £1.5 billion compensation for FMD has been claimed, of which 60% in theory payable by EU.
Interestingly, only £217 million of a possible £948.6 million had been paid to UK by EU by mid September - and the EU audit is still doing its painstaking work.
Read in full
Oct 6 - 13 ~ FMD simulation exercise in Scotland. Mistakes were made. Lessons must be learned
The article in the Scotsman,
about August's FMD simulation exercise describes some "minor blips". Part of Mary Marshall's comment (which needs to be read in full):"Blips"? This is far more serious, and requires
explanation and assurances that in the event of a real infection, the virus will
be rapidly identified and that the key officials, or their seconds, can be
contacted and functioning without delay...
"Vaccination would be considered if FMD spread, but that would depend on the
virus strain." - "if FMD spread" -
determination of the spread must be a top priority, and justifies the wide use
of portable PCR tests linked to computer databases with geographical and
meteorological data.
- Since knowledge of the characteristics of the strain is essential to determine its method of spread, and since identification of the strain requires lab analysis, any delays in transporting the samples rapidly to the lab will have serious consequences. What was the reason for the refusal by the airline? What measures can be taken to ensure this would not occur in a real case of possible infection? Note that if portable rapid PCR tests are used, there would be more certainty about the presence of the virus. How long does it take to identify the virus strain once the samples have arrived in the lab for analysis?
- Would vaccine readiness be put in place immediately upon identification of the strain, or only after a decision was taken based on the spread? Who would make that decision? Would advice be taken from the permanently operational "expert group"? When would the vaccination teams be notified?
Read in full this important comment on the Scottish FMD exercise by Mary Marshall, who is Animal Health Policy Adviser of the European
Livestock Alliance
Oct 6 - 13 ~ No-one will insure GM crops
Oct 6 - 13 ~ "...the Community is also a Community of
values, and its policies to combat animal diseases must not be based purely on commercial
interests but must also take genuine account of ethical principles."
Interesting to see this as the second sentence in the EU Directive on FMD Control now available on the DEFRA website (click here) Among other areas of interest is ANNEX XVII on the Criteria and requirements for contingency plans.. " A permanently operational expert group shall be created, where necessary in collaboration
with other Member States, to maintain expertise and assist the relevant authority in qualitative
disease preparedness." Article 78 makes clear that this expert group shall "....give advice on screening, sampling, test procedures, control and the other measures to be
applied and on the strategy to be implemented, including advice on bio-security measures on
holdings or on premises referred to in Article 16, and in relation to emergency vaccination" and
"follow up and guide the epidemiological inquiry..."
See also ANNEX XIII "..... The use of tests defined in the OIE Manual as "Alternative Tests", or other tests not included
in the OIE Manual, is permitted provided that the performance of the test has been shown to
match or exceed the sensitivity and specificity parameters laid down in the OIE Manual or in
the annexes to Community legislation, whichever is the more stringent."
Oct 6 - 13 ~ The government can no longer claim its hands are tied on GM by the EU.
Letter to the Guardian by MEP Dr Caroline Lucas. "Your report caused such a stir at the European parliament's environment committee, it may have cleared the way for a UK ban. Aides to consumer protection commissioner David Byrne frantically sought faxed copies of your articles as he was grilled by MEPs. Eventually Mr Byrne said any threat to biodiversity should be considered under the wider question of whether GM and non-GM crops can safely coexist - and as such is a national competency.
The government can no longer claim its hands are tied on GM by the EU. Your coverage has prompted the commission to admit for the first time the possibility of a GM-free UK, in line with the clearly stated wishes of the majority of the country. Well done.
Dr Caroline Lucas MEP
Green, SE England
Other letters, " I am neither anti-science nor anti-molecular biology - just as I am not anti-physics because I oppose nuclear weapons." See GM page
Also, a press statement on a survey carried out by the campaigning group FARM into the insurance available for farmers considering growing GM crops. The results show that none of the 5 main insurance underwriters would consider offering cover, and compared the risks associated with GM crops to those occurring with asbestos or thalidomide.
Oct 6 - 13 ~ And so the wheel keeps grinding..
"Defra's interpretation is that where manure is used on
the same farm for improving the land, then it isn't
waste. But when there is some left over after reaching
'beneficial limits', then it is.
But what if you transfer the leftover material - the
'waste' - to another farm for use by someone else to
improve their land up to beneficial limits? In such a
case, the manure might be waste, but there again it
might not.
It would hinge on whether you were disposing of waste
(bad thing) or the other chap was recovering waste
(good thing). The likely outcome is that each case
will be judged on its own merits, which signals more
paperwork....." from Now doth time waste me from the NPA website.
Oct 6 - 13 ~ Caught Between Science & Society:
Researching & Documenting the Impact of FMD
"The Lawlessness of the UK Government's Response to the Foot and Mouth Epidemic of 2001" by Professors David Campbell and Robert Lee (Law School, Cardiff University) will be one of the papers delivered at the FMD conference on October 7th at the East Midlands Conference Centre, Nottingham. Other speakers include Professor Sheila Crispin (Professor and Research Fellow of Comparative Ophthalmology, Division of Companion Animal Studies, University of Bristol), Dr Matt Lobley & Dr Matt Reed (Centre for Rural Research, University of Exeter), Professor Michael Winter (Head of School of Geography, Archaeology & Earth Resources, University of Exeter), Nick Wright (IGBiS, University of Nottingham), Barrie Williams (Editor of the Western Morning News)
Oct 6 - 13 ~ "...the Dutch do not take to idiotic laws all that easily"
"If you look around this part of Holland you
will see that a lot of sheep and goats, and sometimes
even cows ... are not tagged."
Lina from Holland illustrates how other European countries treat some EU rules, but adds " I am not so certain that this has
anything to do with Dutch government sanity. This has
much more to do with Dutch ignoring rules.
.... Our town
council does not have the farm animals on the farms
they partly own tagged, because most of us see no
reason to. It is not a very high point on their
agenda.
Every one knows you can be fined for this but somehow
most do not care so much. And who is going to do the
fining or policing? If they start doing that they would
look even more ridiculous then they do now.
..
....
the Dutch do not take to idiotic laws all that easily
- As we would say:
wat een onzin, nonsense!"
Is this attitude irresponsible or simply admirable common sense? As has been said of the ear tagging rules this "does not improve in any way the traceability of sheep, but it is expensive, unworkable in practice and time wasting. All that is required is traceability to farm of origin, i.e. the registered flock number, or even the holding number; either is unique."
Oct 6 - 13 ~ Einstein would not be ignored today; he would be ground down, like the rest of us in British academia.
Letter in today's Telegraph from Dr Heinrich Harke "....Following the submission of his annual list of publications, Einstein would be hauled before his departmental research committee and warned that his output was unsatisfactory. His head of department would then tell him that his low research productivity meant that he should take on more than his fair share of the 81 permanent administrative jobs specified for his department of 12 full-time academics.
On top of this, he would then be asked to take on half of the admin jobs and personal tutees of a go-ahead colleague, who has just obtained a rare research fellowship to write a book about socially inclusive algebra...."
Sept 30 - Oct 6 ~ according to the FSA's reading of EC hygiene rules, it is perfectly all right for an inexperienced, untrained farmer to kill animals for human consumption, but for a qualified expert to do the job is a criminal offence.
Booker's Notebook
"Pig ignorant"
Zac Goldsmith, the editor of The Ecologist and son of the late Sir James Goldsmith, keeps a herd of pigs on his farm in Devon. For some years, whenever he has wanted to convert one into pork chops for his family table, he has called in a professional slaughterman, one of thousands put out of work when John Selwyn Gummer's bizarre interpretation of an EC meat directive made it too expensive for most of Britain's rural abattoirs to stay in business.
Recently, however, the farm was visited by an official of the State Veterinary Service who said that, on the advice of Sir John Krebs's Food Standards Agency, this was no longer permitted. According to the FSA, the slaughterman was supplying meat "for sale", which was against European rules. The only person who could be permitted to kill the pigs was the farmer himself.
Apart from the obvious point that the slaughterman is not supplying the meat, but only his services, it seems that, according to the FSA's reading of EC hygiene rules, it is perfectly all right for an inexperienced, untrained farmer to kill animals for human consumption, but for a qualified expert to do the job is a criminal offence. Mr Goldsmith looks forward to seeing how Sir John Krebs will defend this."
Sept 30 - Oct 6 ~ Government using CAP reform to divide and rule? asks CLA
See press release "The single most important decision for farmers and landowners to secure their future is due by the end of next week. Yet the full legal text of CAP Reform 2003 that is setting landowner against tenant and farmer against farmer was only published this week. Why is Government forcing England to decide its fate by 10 October, when other EU countries haven't even started to consult their farmers yet? Is DEFRA attempting to divide and rule?..."
Sept 30 - Oct 6 ~"Emergency vaccination is moved to the forefront of control measures instead of being the last resort. The new legislation is a true reform." David Byrne
Brussels, 29 September 2003
FMD: Byrne welcomes new EU legislation to control outbreaks
New legislation on EU measures to control outbreaks of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) was adopted by the Council of Agriculture Ministers today. ".....The Directive outlines the measures to be taken in order to prepare for an outbreak. The main new elements are:
- Provisions are made for diagnostic facilities, in particular a Community Reference Laboratory, including a bank for diagnostic reagents, test kits, etc.
- Detailed provisions are laid down for the management of the European antigen bank and for access to this bank by Member States and, where required, third countries. Specific rules are laid down for the confidential treatment of information on the quantities and strains of antigens stored at the bank.
- Emphasis is put on preparation of contingency plans, including the preparation for a "worst case" scenario. Contingency plans have to be regularly updated in the light of the results of alert exercises
..."
(A reminder of the letter on July 7th 2003 to the Veterinary Record by Paul Roger BSc., MSc., BVetMed., DSHP., CertWEL., MRCVS 'coherent and transparent plan still awaited' )
Sept 30 - Oct 6 ~ Dr David Paton says the world needs quicker FMD vaccines
Dr Paton from Pirbright was talking to Anna Hill this morning on Farmiing Today (transcript) . He is one of a group of scientists from Australia, the United Kingdom, the United States and Canada who want to raise $US60 million (£40 million pounds) to develop an improved vaccine for foot and mouth disease.
They are calling on United Nations agencies and other international donors for support. Anna Hill remarked that it seemed "an awful lot of money". However, Dr Paton used the figure of the £8 billion cost of the 2001 foot and mouth crisis in the UK to call such the amount of this appeal for funds "a drop in the ocean".
While improvements to the speed and scope of vaccines are always to be welcomed, effective vaccines were available at the time of the UK outbreak and were used the same year in Uruguay. "The successful control and eradication of FMD in South America in 2001" Present vaccines would seem effective when they are allowed to be used and rapid diagnosis tests, available, efficient but not yet "validated" would make control even more effective. Simon Barteling and Paul Sutmoller, in their paper (pdf) "Culling versus vaccination: challenging a dogma in veterinary (FMD) science.
wrote "... to our knowledge over the past 15 years there are no examples where after consequent vaccination with a qualified vaccine, disease re-occurred."
Has all the misinformation about vaccination spread in 2001 yet been adequately refuted? Hints received that the UK contingency planning for FMD is not showing improvement are disheartening.
Sept 21 - 27 ~ Mary Marshall writes today (Saturday): " Thank you for drawing attention to the simulation exercises in Wales and Scotland and to my own comments, but I would like the opportunity to clarify my suggestions:
"I believe that it is quite correct, and in fact essential, that the "full details of the exercise [in Wales] will not be fully revealed in order to determine the effectiveness of the systems which would be put in place in relatively authentic circumstances.."However, enough should be reported to enable stakeholders to make informed suggestions to revise the contingency plans.
It is essential that the exercise should include one or more independent emergency management engineers to ensure that there is expertise in management of people and resources under crisis situations. ..... As Martin Hugh-Jones wrote and which you have posted on warmwell (1-7 September): "In this day and age it should be possible to set up a realistic computer based war-game in which the actions taken quantitatively affect, negatively or positively, the outcomes at each stage with suitably built-in time delays. Even with a table top version this should be possible. Unfortunately too often there is a game script that is played out whatever the players do or not do."
". Read letter in full
Sept 21 - 27 ~" full details of the exercise will not be fully revealed in order to determine the effectiveness of the systems which would be put in place in relatively authentic circumstances."
This statement comes in an article on icwales.icnetwork.co.uk, about the FMD exercise in Wales due to take place on September 30. Carwyn Jones is reported as saying, "Effectiveness has to be tested and this exercise will be part of the testing programme."
And will this exercise make use of rapid diagnosis tests and the technology developed since the 2001 outbreak? We are told that the simulation exercise in Scotland in August - astonishingly - was carried out using old
technology. As Mary Marshall wrote in August, what is needed is:" a revised and updated FMD Contingency Plan which takes into account individual electronic animal ID and the use of rapid portable virus diagnostic tests which can and should be linked to an updated GIS database, thus increasing the chances of prompt identification of an index case and allowing for real-time management and enabling useful post-epidemic epidemiological data analysis .....Above all, the creation (which is a requirement in the EU FMD Directive) of "a permanently operational Expert Group ..." Read in full
Sept 21-27 ~The new national scrapie plan scheme announced by Defra has been described as "bad news and bad science"
Farmers Weekly interactive announced yesterday, "The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs announces the
go-ahead plans for a National Scrapie Plan Scheme for scrapie-affected
flocks http://www.defra.gov.uk/news/2003/030924d.htm
"
But there is currently no evidence of naturally occurring BSE in sheep. Scrapie has been present in sheep for many hundreds of years. Selecting for scrapie-resistant genotypes is not necessarily the correct approach to controlling scrapie and certainly cannot be extended to controlling the theoretical risk of BSE in sheep.
It would appear that neither DEFRA nor its Government Ministers have learnt anything from the 2001 Foot and Mouth epidemic, in which huge numbers of healthy hefted sheep were slaughtered unnecessarily.
Farmers in the North of
England say that they were told "You
people have got to realize that we do not need your sheep. We can import all the
meat we need". This does, if true, explain to some extent the Government's perverse approach
Experts have raised grave objections:- Dr Alan Dickinson raised the issues of MAFF's insistence on being exclusively in charge during the BSE crisis, feigned "consultation" over MAFF's National Scrapie Plan, and the scientific flaws inherent in such a plan.
-in a letter about the ignorance surrounding TSE's
- The Animal Health Bill and the National Scrapie Plan are based on bad and unsafe
science - according to this Information document
prepared by:
Northern Short-Tailed Sheep Group
with support from
Rare Breeds International
Only yesterday, Sabine Zentis of http://www.ela-europe.org/ wrote to this website: "
To my great amazement I learn that 8 sheep of "resistant" genotype tested positive for TSE in a survey .....
A few months ago a two year old sheep in Germany was found to be positive for scrapie and it later turned out to be of the "resistant" genotype." (her letter in full)
Sept 21 -27 2003 ~ TB outbreak on Anglesey - no badgers, enclosed herd, farm was given the all-clear 11 months ago - more slaughter of breeding stock
Daily Post "....Vets will slaughter 20 of his cattle in a final check for the bacteria....
Mystery surrounds the outbreak, which occurred on a
farm that runs an enclosed herd, is free of badgers,
and was tested for bovine TB just 11 months ago.
Tests on 160 cattle have revealed 20 positive
"reactors" but the outbreak will not be officially
confirmed until the animals have been slaughtered and
investigated...."
Scientific tests to establish the cause of bovine TB are not due to start until next year, and tests on cattle have been cut back.
Sept 21 - 27 ~ "The arguments against vaccination, based on the assumption that vaccinated animals can become infected without showing signs of the disease, are spurious..."
Professor Fred Brown's paper "The history of Research in foot and mouth disease" (from Pages 3-7 of Virus Research Volume 91, Issue 1) is now in the public domain. See technical page on warmwell.
Sept 21 -27 ~ The 2001 foot and mouth disease epidemic in the United Kingdom: animal welfare perspectives
(See technical page)
Also now available freely on the internet is the OIE paper from S.M. Crispin, P.A. Roger, H. O'Hare & S.H. Binns
The 2001 foot and mouth disease epidemic in the United Kingdom: animal welfare perspectives
which can be accessed in full. Extract: "An ethical, socially integrated and acceptable policy for the
control of infectious disease in food-producing animals needs
to be developed (14, 29, 30). A consensual approach and
communication between stakeholders are key factors, so that all sectors of the community understand and accept the
rationale behind the measures outlined. The report of the Royal
Society on infectious diseases in livestock recommended that
'better contingency planning is vital' (30)
To be effective,
contingency plans need to be prepared, widely available, kept
up-to-date and practised regularly, so that in the eventuality (or
inevitability) of FMD occurring, a well-understood strategy can
be implemented rapidly. Most importantly, one of the lessons to
be learned from the 2001 FMD epidemic is that animal welfare
must be built into new policies and procedures: 'a balance must
be struck between disease control and welfare but welfare must
not be set aside, even in an emergency' (13).
This conclusion in the paper reminds us of the letter to The Veterinary Record 7th July 2003 by
Paul Roger BSc., MSc., BVetMed., DSHP., CertWEL., MRCVS in which he said, "...A coherent and transparent plan for dealing with the next outbreak of FMD to occur in this country is still awaited..."
Sept 21 - 27 ~ Sheep at centre of BSE scare
Sabine Zentis of http://www.ela-europe.org/ writes, "
To my great amazement I learn that 8 sheep of "resistant" genotype tested positive for TSE in a survey and that this should have created a scare.
A few months ago a two year old sheep in Germany was found to be positive for scrapie and it later turned out to be of the "resistant" genotype.
This finding was confirmed by the German authorities. So no news at all.
I wonder why sheep breeders throughout the EU accept the various schemes of breeding for a phantom resistance permitting the destruction of valuable bloodlines, the loss of diversity and a deterioration of the genetic variations within sheep breeds.
From the start the project was based on assumptions, theories and not on sound science...." (Read in full)
Sept 21 - 27 ~ The FMD question is still going on
- for
update see Veterinary Practice report on RC Open Day "......Mr Mike Nelson had written regarding clarification of the cases considered by the Preliminary Investigations Committee about FMD expressing his concern about the perceived lack of progress. He was invited to make his point to the meeting. He drew attention to the resignation from both the Council and the College by Mr Roger Windsor over FMD issues and was of the opinion that there were others who held the same views.
The President said that there had been thiry-eight complaints..."
(Professor Robert May) "warned against relying upon mathematical models and computer generated information as opposed to using common sense..."
A reminder of the contribution made by Roger Windsor MBE. MA. BSc. BVM&S. MRCVS to the Royal Society (Edinburgh) Inquiry
Sept 21 - 27 ~ "the banning of Canadian beef might have had a lot more to do with protectionism than health concerns"
writes the journalist Peter Foster of the National Post in Canada "...vCJD. This disease, which hits young people, has been assumed to be linked to eating infected meat; indeed, it is regularly referred to in the media as the "human version of mad cow disease." This is the stated opinion of the British government, which has been most affected by both BSE and the vCJD scare. Concern over BSE led to the slaughter of some five million British cattle and cost the industry billions. However, there have not merely been doubts cast on the BSE/vCJD link, but suggestions the British government doesn't want to hear them because it is so locked into the molecular "prion" theory attributed to Nobel prize winner Stanley Prusiner. However, not merely have vegetarians come down with the disease, but the number of cases of vCJD in the U.K. is not escalating, as "experts" suggested, but declining. A fascinating recent article in the Times of London noted that an Australian scientist named Alan Ebringer had posited an alternative theory that vCJD is in fact a microbe-based autoimmune disease somewhat like multiple sclerosis. However, the British government withdrew his research grant...." See also warmwell's page on BSE
Sept 21-27 ~ The chairman of the GM Debate Steering Board, Professor Malcolm Grant, told the BBC the overwhelming response to GM was one of "concern and scepticism".
BBC " More than half of Britons who took part in a nationwide debate on genetically modified crops said they should never be introduced under any circumstances.
An official report (access pdf file here in new window) on the results of 600 meetings held in June and July around the country reflects widespread doubts about the benefits of GM technology.
The GM Nation? report says the public mood on GM "ranged from caution and doubt, through suspicion and scepticism, to hostility and rejection". Only 2% said they would be happy to eat GM foods.
The government has promised to consider the 40,000 public responses before deciding whether to go ahead with commercial GM crops....The report is likely to create a dilemma for the government and make awkward reading for biotechnology companies seeking to sell their GM seeds to British farmers.
Friends of the Earth says a number of key ministers are known to favour GM commercialisation
"
GM page
(The government is due to release its report on the FSEs on 16 October)
Sept 21 - 27 ~ Canada, the U.S. and Mexico want an international group overseeing animal health issues.
In their letter to the 164-nation OIE, the North American officials call for a uniform system to deal with future BSE cases that would encourage full participation in testing and reporting the disease.
From DowJones Newswires
"We're asking them to make much more visible to countries the fact that these standards exist, they have been endorsed by the scientific community, and they should be used to formulate trade policy," said Brian Evans, chief veterinary officer for the Canadian Food Inspection Agency.
.....
Despite an extensive investigation of Canada's lone case that found no other stricken animals, most of the bans on Canadian beef products and cattle remain in place almost four months later. .....
Evans said the problem is that most countries continue to react to BSE with "the same level of fear and paranoia" as when the disease broke out in Europe and Asia more than a decade ago. "We've come a long way since then," he said, noting that research shows the illness doesn't appear in animals under 30 months old or spread to many muscle cuts of beef. .."
(Alberta's Premier, Ralph Klein,famously told a meeting with U.S. officials this week that any "self-respecting rancher would have shot, shoveled and shut up" when faced with a sick cow. )
Sept 21-27 ~ What input will UK stakeholders have into this important dialogue?
Mary Marshall
Animal Health Policy Coordinator
European Livestock Alliance asks: "What input will UK stakeholders have into this important dialogue?"
August 28 (extract)
"..absence of information.....Only the official delegate, the CVO (or the national equivalent, as in the US it is the Deputy Administrator of Veterinary Services, APHIS) can report to the OIE, .... Consequently, input into the decision making process of OIE depends on each country having a CVO who informs and consults with stakeholders. This is particularly significant when objections to change can easily outweigh the lack of response from those approving change, when such a lack of response may have been the result of failure to consult with stakeholders." (Read her open letter, "FMD legal issues - some comments and suggestions"
in full)
Sept 21 - 27 ~ more chemicals are used to grow food in Britain than in any other major industrialised country
said the Environmental Performance Reviews - United Kingdom, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 2002. (Guardian report)
A prominent pesticide campaigner, Georgina Downs , is trying to get the government to tighten up the
regulation of pesticides. The deadline for the first Consultation on Greater Access to Information
about Crop-spraying has been extended to the 30th September and Ms Downs urges people to make their concerns known to DEFRA.
The Consultation Documents are also available online at: http://www.pesticides.gov.uk/applicant/aahip/aahl0320.htm
The DEFRA News Release and Consultation links are at: www.defra.gov.uk/news/2003/030721a.htm
PAN UK's Action on Pesticide Exposure (PEX) website questionnaire on Your Right to Know includes: 5. Some officials involved in the registration of pesticides and the monitoring of pesticide-related ill-health may have commercial interests in the agrochemical industry (ie. companies that produce pesticides). Do you believe the government should be obliged to disclose these interests?
Sept 21 -27 2003 ~ TB outbreak on Anglesey - no badgers, enclosed herd, farm was given the all-clear 11 months ago - more slaughter of breeding stock
Daily Post "....Vets will slaughter 20 of his cattle in a final check for the bacteria....
Mystery surrounds the outbreak, which occurred on a
farm that runs an enclosed herd, is free of badgers,
and was tested for bovine TB just 11 months ago.
Tests on 160 cattle have revealed 20 positive
"reactors" but the outbreak will not be officially
confirmed until the animals have been slaughtered and
investigated...."
Scientific tests to establish the cause of bovine TB are not due to start until next year, and tests on cattle have been cut back.
Sept 21 - 27 ~ "The arguments against vaccination, based on the assumption that vaccinated animals can become infected without showing signs of the disease, are spurious..."
Professor Fred Brown's paper "The history of Research in foot and mouth disease" (from Pages 3-7 of Virus Research Volume 91, Issue 1) is now in the public domain. See technical page on warmwell.
Sept 21 -27 ~ The 2001 foot and mouth disease epidemic in the United Kingdom: animal welfare perspectives
(See technical page)
Also now available freely on the internet is the OIE paper from S.M. Crispin, P.A. Roger, H. O’Hare & S.H. Binns
The 2001 foot and mouth disease epidemic in the United Kingdom: animal welfare perspectives
which can be accessed in full. Extract: "An ethical, socially integrated and acceptable policy for the
control of infectious disease in food-producing animals needs
to be developed (14, 29, 30). A consensual approach and
communication between stakeholders are key factors, so that all sectors of the community understand and accept the
rationale behind the measures outlined. The report of the Royal
Society on infectious diseases in livestock recommended that
‘better contingency planning is vital’ (30)
To be effective,
contingency plans need to be prepared, widely available, kept
up-to-date and practised regularly, so that in the eventuality (or
inevitability) of FMD occurring, a well-understood strategy can
be implemented rapidly. Most importantly, one of the lessons to
be learned from the 2001 FMD epidemic is that animal welfare
must be built into new policies and procedures: ‘a balance must
be struck between disease control and welfare but welfare must
not be set aside, even in an emergency’ (13).
This conclusion in the paper reminds us of the letter to The Veterinary Record 7th July 2003 by
Paul Roger BSc., MSc., BVetMed., DSHP., CertWEL., MRCVS in which he said, "...A coherent and transparent plan for dealing with the next outbreak of FMD to occur in this country is still awaited..."
Sept 21 - 27 ~ Sheep at centre of BSE scare
Sabine Zentis of http://www.ela-europe.org/ writes, "
To my great amazement I learn that 8 sheep of "resistant" genotype tested positive for TSE in a survey and that this should have created a scare.
A few months ago a two year old sheep in Germany was found to be positive for scrapie and it later turned out to be of the "resistant" genotype.
This finding was confirmed by the German authorities. So no news at all.
I wonder why sheep breeders throughout the EU accept the various schemes of breeding for a phantom resistance permitting the destruction of valuable bloodlines, the loss of diversity and a deterioration of the genetic variations within sheep breeds.
From the start the project was based on assumptions, theories and not on sound science...." (Read in full)
Sept 21 - 27 ~ The FMD question is still going on
- for
update see Veterinary Practice report on RC Open Day "......Mr Mike Nelson had written regarding clarification of the cases considered by the Preliminary Investigations Committee about FMD expressing his concern about the perceived lack of progress. He was invited to make his point to the meeting. He drew attention to the resignation from both the Council and the College by Mr Roger Windsor over FMD issues and was of the opinion that there were others who held the same views.
The President said that there had been thiry-eight complaints..."
(Professor Robert May) "warned against relying upon mathematical models and computer generated information as opposed to using common sense..."
A reminder of the contribution made by Roger Windsor MBE. MA. BSc. BVM&S. MRCVS to the Royal Society (Edinburgh) Inquiry
Sept 21 - 27 ~ "the banning of Canadian beef might have had a lot more to do with protectionism than health concerns"
writes the journalist Peter Foster of the National Post in Canada "...vCJD. This disease, which hits young people, has been assumed to be linked to eating infected meat; indeed, it is regularly referred to in the media as the "human version of mad cow disease." This is the stated opinion of the British government, which has been most affected by both BSE and the vCJD scare. Concern over BSE led to the slaughter of some five million British cattle and cost the industry billions. However, there have not merely been doubts cast on the BSE/vCJD link, but suggestions the British government doesn't want to hear them because it is so locked into the molecular "prion" theory attributed to Nobel prize winner Stanley Prusiner. However, not merely have vegetarians come down with the disease, but the number of cases of vCJD in the U.K. is not escalating, as "experts" suggested, but declining. A fascinating recent article in the Times of London noted that an Australian scientist named Alan Ebringer had posited an alternative theory that vCJD is in fact a microbe-based autoimmune disease somewhat like multiple sclerosis. However, the British government withdrew his research grant...." See also warmwell's page on BSE
Sept 21-27 ~ The chairman of the GM Debate Steering Board, Professor Malcolm Grant, told the BBC the overwhelming response to GM was one of "concern and scepticism".
BBC " More than half of Britons who took part in a nationwide debate on genetically modified crops said they should never be introduced under any circumstances.
An official report (access pdf file here in new window) on the results of 600 meetings held in June and July around the country reflects widespread doubts about the benefits of GM technology.
The GM Nation? report says the public mood on GM "ranged from caution and doubt, through suspicion and scepticism, to hostility and rejection". Only 2% said they would be happy to eat GM foods.
The government has promised to consider the 40,000 public responses before deciding whether to go ahead with commercial GM crops....The report is likely to create a dilemma for the government and make awkward reading for biotechnology companies seeking to sell their GM seeds to British farmers.
Friends of the Earth says a number of key ministers are known to favour GM commercialisation
"
GM page
(The government is due to release its report on the FSEs on 16 October)
Sept 21 - 27 ~ Canada, the U.S. and Mexico want an international group overseeing animal health issues.
In their letter to the 164-nation OIE, the North American officials call for a uniform system to deal with future BSE cases that would encourage full participation in testing and reporting the disease.
From DowJones Newswires
"We're asking them to make much more visible to countries the fact that these standards exist, they have been endorsed by the scientific community, and they should be used to formulate trade policy," said Brian Evans, chief veterinary officer for the Canadian Food Inspection Agency.
.....
Despite an extensive investigation of Canada's lone case that found no other stricken animals, most of the bans on Canadian beef products and cattle remain in place almost four months later. .....
Evans said the problem is that most countries continue to react to BSE with "the same level of fear and paranoia" as when the disease broke out in Europe and Asia more than a decade ago. "We've come a long way since then," he said, noting that research shows the illness doesn't appear in animals under 30 months old or spread to many muscle cuts of beef. .."
(Alberta's Premier, Ralph Klein,famously told a meeting with U.S. officials this week that any "self-respecting rancher would have shot, shoveled and shut up" when faced with a sick cow. )
Sept 21-27 ~ What input will UK stakeholders have into this important dialogue?
Mary Marshall
Animal Health Policy Coordinator
European Livestock Alliance asks: "What input will UK stakeholders have into this important dialogue?"
August 28 (extract)
"..absence of information.....Only the official delegate, the CVO (or the national equivalent, as in the US it is the Deputy Administrator of Veterinary Services, APHIS) can report to the OIE, .... Consequently, input into the decision making process of OIE depends on each country having a CVO who informs and consults with stakeholders. This is particularly significant when objections to change can easily outweigh the lack of response from those approving change, when such a lack of response may have been the result of failure to consult with stakeholders." (Read her open letter, "FMD legal issues - some comments and suggestions"
in full)
Sept 21 - 27 ~ more chemicals are used to grow food in Britain than in any other major industrialised country
said the Environmental Performance Reviews - United Kingdom, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 2002. (Guardian report)
A prominent pesticide campaigner, Georgina Downs , is trying to get the government to tighten up the
regulation of pesticides. The deadline for the first Consultation on Greater Access to Information
about Crop-spraying has been extended to the 30th September and Ms Downs urges people to make their concerns known to DEFRA.
The Consultation Documents are also available online at: http://www.pesticides.gov.uk/applicant/aahip/aahl0320.htm
The DEFRA News Release and Consultation links are at: www.defra.gov.uk/news/2003/030721a.htm
PAN UK’s Action on Pesticide Exposure (PEX) website questionnaire on Your Right to Know includes: 5. Some officials involved in the registration of pesticides and the monitoring of pesticide-related ill-health may have commercial interests in the agrochemical industry (ie. companies that produce pesticides). Do you believe the government should be obliged to disclose these interests?
Sept 21- 27 ~" farmers in the six counties of England's eastern region consume more than a quarter of agricultural subsidies in Britain - more than £540m annually."
The revelation that they rake in so much from the £2bn-plus in direct agricultural subsidy each year will further strengthen the resolve of Gordon Brown to press for "root and branch" reform of the EU's lavish common agricultural policy, or CAP.
After the collapse of global trade talks in Cancun eight days ago, the chancellor is pressing for a speedy resumption of negotiations and a commitment from western leaders to break down trade barriers which penalise the poorest countries. .." Guardian
Sept 21- 27 ~ The Royal Society's refusal to publish the GM crop trials overview paper likely to "arouse suspicions" about the society's motives.
Also revealed today is the leaked exchange of ministerial letters which demonstrate that ministers will support Brussels moves to ban GM-free zones and allow the "co-existence" of GM with conventional crops.
See GM page
Sept 21- 27 ~ "Foot-and-mouth ran wild, GM is used ineptly and we can't trust meat."
"...if humanity really cares about humanity we need to grasp the nettle -- to acknowledge that the present generation of "experts" and leaders have got it all horribly wrong. We (meaning all of us) have got to re-think agriculture from first principles -- ask what it is, and what we really want from it, and how to get the world back on course."
The Sunday Herald publishes an essay adapted from the new book by Colin Tudge So Shall We Reap, published by Penguin on September 25. It reveals "why farming is killing us … and our only hope"
See also warmwell's entry for December 13 2001
Sept 21- 27 ~ Sheep tags - "the regulation merely takes a previous version referring to cattle, changing "bovine" to "ovine" throughout"
Booker's Notebook (Sunday Telegraph) "As any farmer would immediately recognise, this proposal is insane""....Defra had costed up Sanco's proposal. Allowing three minutes for each tagging or check on a number, with labour costs of £12 an hour, Defra calculated that the basic cost of the scheme to the average UK sheep farmer would be between £13,000 and £16,000 a year. Sheep farmers' current annual incomes average £11,136. There are 67 million sheep movements a year, so copying the digits would take 3.35 million hours, totalling £40 million. Replacing lost tags would cost another £14 million. Adding further costs, such as on-farm record-keeping (£8 million), and Defra's figures show that scarcely a sheep farmer in Britain could stay in business.
Yet when Mr Parish and his fellow MEPs on the European Parliament's agriculture committee recently quizzed no fewer than eight of Mr Byrne's officials on what they thought they were doing, it was clear the officials knew nothing about sheep (the regulation merely takes a previous version referring to cattle, changing "bovine" to "ovine" throughout). It was equally clear that the officials had no intention of changing a regulation that will make sheep farming virtually impossible...."
read in full
Sept 21 - 27 ~ The Daily Mail hypes fears of sheep slaughter
Several worried emails on Saturday 20 Sept refer to the article in the Daily Mail, "BSE : Could it be in Sheep?" The article cites the tests, carried out two years ago, which found that 52 samples out of nearly 30,000 showed signs of scrapie..and adds the entirely speculative view, based on nothing more than guesswork of a dubious kind, that the follow-up tests that came back positive on 24 of them might suggest the presence of BSE.
We mentioned this story on September 12th and subsequently published the expert opinion of Dr Martin Hugh-Jones. He said, of similar reports in the press, that they were, "so journalistically confused that we decided to just let it ride until harder information was released." Reassuringly, he added "Until there is hard evidence that BSE is occurring in UK sheep --- i.e. in privately owned flocks, not just at various research institutes --- I think such reports should be watched with interest but not concern."
(Read whole message)
Some journalists seem to delight in hyping up fears of mass slaughter without giving the real picture and without ever questionning the unproved notion that eating BSE infected meat ever caused vCJD. See also the Independent and the warmwell inbox
Sept 14 - 20 ~ "Alternative views on cause and control have been side-lined."
John Turner, dairy farmer & Board Member of the organisation FARM, has written to Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Margaret Beckett, asking her to initiate an urgent review into how and to what ends publicly-funded science is directed in agriculture. Read letter in full
".... it is our view that there is a need for a new, demonstrably independent, overarching science body to replace the existing Biotechnology & Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC). "
Mr Turner writes, "......... the failure of science to respond proportionately to the needs of agriculture and to map out a course for progress that meets the common objectives of farmers and consumers alike. In the livestock sectors of farming we have witnessed draconian measures taken by the government to control the spread of Foot and Mouth disease. Many would argue that there have been similarly disproportionate and controversial measures in response to the incidence of BSE in cattle and that of Salmonella in Chickens. Alternative views on cause and control have been side-lined. It is likely that the Government will also resort to methods for controlling the spread of TB that are more typical of the 18th century than the 21st....we believe that it is time for a review of the objectives of research, how they are prioritised and of greatest importance, to ensure that they are aligned with the expectations of those footing the bill - the public.
"
See also GM page
Sept 14 - 20 ~ "...the biotech industry has turned to a more subtle public relations drive to gain European acceptance of GM."
"....They have begun using "the poverty card," suggesting that Europe's resistance "impedes the global use of a technology that could be of great benefit to farmers and consumers around the world."
From the report by Aaron deGrassi of the Institute of Development Studies, at the University of Sussex, UK, on whether GM crops are addressing the real causes of poverty and hunger in Africa: Genetically Modified Crops and Sustainable Poverty Alleviation in Sub-Saharan Africa. (pdf file - external link) The very readable report deliberately avoids spelling out policy recommendations but does conclude that poor farmers should have
influence over technologies and policies and also over how agricultural policies are formulated, interpreted, implemented and enforced - a principle relevant to small farmers everywhere. As deGrassi says elsewhere (http://www.grain.org/seedling/seed-03-07-4-en.cfm), "Farmers need to be returned to centre-stage to re-assume their central role as custodians of the world’s agricultural resources and the directors of research and innovation"
See also GM page
Sept 14 - 20 ~ the theoretical risk of
scrapie obscuring hypothetical BSE....
Many readers have been alarmed by reports in the Guardian (below) and The Scotsman about contingency plans that include the killing of the entire UK sheep flock.
Luckily, following our pleas for expert opinion, we have heard from Dr Martin Hugh-Jones (Professor of Epidemiology and Public Health
Director, WHO Collaborating Center for Remote Sensing
and Geographic Information Systems for Public Health)
that things are not quite what these newspapers are suggesting. He writes, "....Until there is hard evidence that BSE is occurring in UK sheep --- i.e.
in
privately owned flocks, not just at various research institutes --- I
think
such reports should be watched with interest but not concern...... In this instance 30,000
sheep
were screened with a yield of a possible 24 with both tests positive,
assuming that the second test is reliable. This is less than 1 in 1000
sheep whether they are seeing scrapie or BSE. If the scrapie prevalence is
0.33%
(as reported here) one would expect all or most of these 24 positives
to
be
scrapie.
....." (Read in full)
Sept 14 - 20 ~ live animal test for the detection of TSE
Up to now, the current method involves severing the animal's head from its body and shipping it to state laboratories.
http://www.genethera.net/news/index.html
Dr. Antonio Milici, CEO of GeneThera, Inc.: "This is just the tip of the iceberg for us, with this technology, we can now move quickly into testing and therapeutic vaccination for many related diseases such as, Mad Cow Disease, E. coli 0157: H7, Foot and Mouth Disease, and others."
"Our ability to study these animals without slaughtering them is invaluable to helping us learn more about this disease. We are in the process of developing a vaccination for CWD thus eliminating the need for mass slaughters of these animals. Being able to monitor the herds without slaughtering them will progress our study."
GeneThera's scientists utilized the very sensitive and accurate Fluorogenic PCR technology and a very precise mathematical method to analyze the data.
Sept 7 - 13 ~ The government is reviewing contingency plans for a sheep catastrophe, long recognised as a theoretical risk.
A report in the Guardian (Friday) concerns yet again the vexed question of the theoretical risk of "BSE in sheep". In spite of failures to detect BSE occurring naturally in sheep, we read that"contingency plans ....are believed to include changing the way sheep meat is prepared for food, culling infected animals and other possible contacts, and, in the most drastic resort, destroying virtually the whole national flock of 36m animals."
Apparently the EU is insisting on more tests on sheep in abattoirs: "material from sheep brains collected from abattoirs has been screened by a rapid test which can be completed overnight. However, this Biorad test has only been formally approved by the EU for tests on cattle, not for sheep."
Positive results have to be rechecked with a laboratory test. It seems that Sir John Krebs is puzzled that "52 rapid test results which suggests the presence of scrapie or similar disease were double-checked. In 28 of these extra tests there was no sign of any problem at all.." and is now speculating that "it could be a different TSE, possibly even BSE, detected by the Biorad test and not by testing."
We should very much appreciate some expert comment about the scientific grounds justifying a contingency plan that involves the possible killing of the entire UK sheep flock.
Sept 7-13 ~"The agent in question is a genetically modified virus designed to replicate and spread. It is a new, man-made disease"
Part of Designer diseases , an article from the New Scientist that examines both the potential benefits and potential disasters of using transmissible GMOs.
"Once released, they will be as hard to control as any other wildlife disease. Like natural diseases, they could be accidentally or deliberately taken to other countries. They could mutate or recombine with other viruses. They could jump species. The consequences could be disastrous.
. "You can't assume that the modified virus will act like the parental strain," warns Adrian Gibbs, an expert on viral evolution formerly at the Australian National University in Canberra.
So far PAC-CRC has shown only that the mouse GMO does not infect rats, and that three species of native rodents are immune to the unmodified virus. It is gearing up to conduct safety experiments that will test the virus's ability to infect a wide range of species, including some rare mouse species in the US. The ultimate experiment will be releasing the virus. If it turns out that PAC-CRC has got it wrong, there may be little anyone can do about it." New Scientist website is at http://www.newscientist.com
Sept 7 - 13 ~ Bluetongue is heading north across Europe
NB there is a new report, with moderator's comments (Archive Number 20030910.2279 Published Date 10-SEP-2003 Subject Bluetongue, sheep - Europe: alert "This will
continue to affect trade agreements; USA-animal exports were banned because
of non-pathogenic BT. Clearly there is a need for better coordinated
surveillance throughout Europe and especially in those countries presently
without BT.
J. Anderson at the the Animal Health Institute at Pirbright developed a
good diagnostic test based on monoclonal antibodies, reliable for detecting
specific antibodies against all serotypes..." )
Reuters report ( also picked up by the BBC.) Dr Philip Mellor, of the Institute for Animal Health, said that once the disease got into a flock up to 70% of the animals could die.
He told the British Association annual science festival that the
virus exists around the world in a very broad band from about 40 degrees north to about 35 degrees south. "But in the last five years we've had outbreaks in Europe which have been spreading up to 44 degrees north ...."
Midge species that are now able to exist further north are picking up and spreading the virus.
Sept 7 - 13 ~ Zimbabwe mass cull of buffalo "futile and bizarre"
Independent on Monday "...Zimbabwe is culling thousands of buffalo to "contain" foot-and-mouth disease in a move that has sparked protests and been described as "futile and bizarre"...."
Meanwhile, in Argentina, now that FMD has been confirmed in the
province of Salta, slaughter of the animals and their contacts will take place. Even though the area has low livestock density and is farmed by
subsistence producers and where the meat is destined for local consumption only, this slaughter must take place in order to comply with the
regulations issued by the OIE so that the area may recover its status of
'zone free of foot and mouth disease with vaccination' within 180 days
There is no animal movement to other areas of the country, and no
properties are registered for slaughter and export to foreign markets.
Sept 7 - 13 ~ "Defra given carte blanche to kill" - Booker's Notebook
The work of the two Cardiff professors (see science/technical page) is the subject of part of Christopher Booker's column in the Sunday Telegraph today
"Two law professors, in a trenchant paper in one of Britain's most respected law journals, confirm what was often reported in this column during the 2001 foot and mouth epidemic: the "pre-emptive cull" under which eight million healthy animals were slaughtered was wholly illegal.
Prof David Campbell and Prof Robert Lee, of Cardiff University, show in their paper, "The Power to Panic" (reproduced on www.warmwell. com), in Public Law, why the cull policy constituted perhaps the greatest criminal act ever perpetrated by a British government....
.....When the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) joined the case, Mr Scudamore told the Court of Appeal that 140 sheep on the Beacons showed "clinical disease", indicating "a heavy weight of infection". When, however, Miss Hughes produced test results showing that only "one antibody" had been found, this evidence was ruled inadmissible. After spending her life savings on the case, she was pursued by Defra for £17,000 legal costs, and in January this year bailiffs arrived to seize all her property, including toys belonging to her 12-year-old son.
After months of stand-off, Defra has agreed to drop its claim in return for £4,000, which was sent to Miss Hughes by wellwishers from all over the country, including readers of this column. In their meticulously-documented paper, Prof Lee and Prof Campbell confirm that her reading of the law was correct, as implicitly did the Government in bulldozing through the Animal Health Act 2002 giving it the powers it did not have in 2001...."
( Read column in full) The Janet Hughes story on warmwell.
Sept 1 -7 ~ "It is bewildering from a legal point of view that people can have their livelihoods just taken away from them"
More comment about the Cardiff professors' paper, "Carnage by Computer: The Blackboard Economics of the 2001 Foot and Mouth Epidemic" from the Westmorland Gazette. "a policy which worked perfectly in abstract on a computer screen in London but failed when applied on the ground hundreds of miles away."
"The report argues that during the cull the former Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food (Maff) descended into "criminal authoritarianism" and exceeded its own powers to implement a policy "so lacking in merit that it could not have been implemented by rational persuasion." See News page.
Sept 1-7 ~"... their final farcical solution on these poor creatures?"
In Wisconsin, authorities aim to cull the entire deer population. The September 4 article in Nature Chronic wasting disease spreads with ease quotes Mark Woolhouse, ( a close colleague of Roy Anderson), who says " It's an unfortunate argument in favour of stamping out the whole herd." (sic) The assumption that an "infectious" protein spreads the disease is not questioned in the Nature article. "Infection is thought to spread in urine, saliva or faeces, via routes such as shared scratching posts or contaminated grazing land."
A year ago, Mark Purdey wrote, ".... the US government has sadly adopted the same unproven hypothetical mindset on the origins of these diseases; that TSEs stem from exposure to hyper infectious 'prions' that are readily transmitted via body to body contact (saliva, etc), or via 'prion' contaminated feed. ." "..Straightforward copper supplementation of deer in CWD risk areas may be all that is required to prevent manganese replacing the depleted copper at the critical prion protein bonding sites in the deer's brain." .."who is questioning the scientific reasoning of the US authorities for executing their final farcical solution on these poor creatures?" Full article
Mark Purdey, at last gaining the respect of scientists world wide for his meticulous self-funded research, would understand entirely why stamping out the herd could not eradicate the disease. His study into TSEs has led him to ask: Infrasonic shock waves, high manganese, low copper; what's the connection with CWD ?
" ...it was of no surprise when I heard the recent news that CWD had now been identified in deer living around Mt Horeb in Wisconsin
....My field survey and analyses revealed low copper throughout the deer's food chain, in combination with ... local deer consuming large quantities of pine needles -- which analysed out at 2000 + ppm of available manganese...
Intriguingly, the CWD endemic region of Colorado is also well noted for its high intensities of natural radiations of low frequency infrasound.
...."
See more on Mark Purdey's research
Last month, the Pro-Med moderator said of CWD
"...there remain more questions than answers regarding
this disease."
Sept 1-7 ~ " toxin levels are assessed via an unpleasant technique known as the Mouse Bioassay Test..."
The Independent (Saturday) on the " strange sequence of events" stemming from "bans imposed by the Food Standards Agency (FSA) on many English and Welsh cockle beds following the alleged detection of dangerous levels of toxins in the shellfish. "
"Our industry has been brought to its knees by the total incompetence of the FSA and the laboratory it employs" ...Samples that were repeatedly declared positive by Cefas produced negative results when sent to laboratories in Holland, Sweden, France and Spain, and to the National Reference Laboratory. ... the cocklemen insist that the test was simply done wrongly by the Cefas laboratory. They claim that inadequate testing procedures produced atypical results. Ratley's company(Kershaw's Quality Foods, which was forced to lay off 50 employees at cockle-processing plants in South Wales and the Thames estuary) has instituted a judicial review of the FSA and other authorities which imposed the ban. "It caused absolute disaster within the industry and the cost will run into millions of pounds," he says. "The whole of the industry will be seeking compensation."
Sept 1 - 7 ~ "There are fears that meat from lambs reared on 300 farms in Wales could be contaminated as some farmers may be illegally dipping their sheep in chemicals normally used on crops. "
The BBC reports today "The government's Veterinary Medicines Directorate (VMD) has begun an investigation"
" The pesticide in question - a form of the chemical Cypermethrin - is up to six times cheaper than approved ones but has never been tested for use on animals and is thought to damage health if people are exposed to excessive amounts.
Added to that, the Environment Agency says it is also thought the chemical is being dumped in rivers, killing insects and starving the fish which feed on them.........John Thorley, chief executive of the National Sheep Association said he was very concerned.
"We've started to develop a good name as an industry and this sort of thing is extremely inappropriate." ...."
Cypermethrin
ki
Sept 1 -7 ~ Suspected FMD in Argentina. Immediate measures taken - no pre-emptive slaughter.
Report from Pro-Med can be read here. ( Archive Number20030903.2215
Published Date03-SEP-2003
SubjectPRO/AH> Foot & mouth disease - Argentina (Salta): susp (02))
Sept 1 - 7 ~ " senior veterinary staff must be in charge"
After the departure of Jim Scudamore, will the new CVO take heed of the recommendations of Angus M Taylor MRCVS to the Royal Society Inquiry?
The past president of the BVA ( British Veterinary Association) and
Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons made a lengthy submission to the RS Inquiry.
Summary :
- Increase veterinary field staff to pre-Le Brecht levels.
- Train staff in Foot & Mouth Disease diagnosis.
- Small centres increase efficiency and control but
senior veterinary staff must be in charge.
- There are now at least 90 Assistant Secretaries in
DEFRA. When the SVS was enlarged in 1938, there
were only 8 in the Ministry of Agriculture.
- DEFRA has now expanded at Headquarters with
three new posts: Director General of Food and
Agriculture (Le Brecht), Director General of
Operations (Addison) and the Chief Veterinary
Officer is now Director General of Animal Health.
The increase in staff should be in the field and not in
creating more bureaucrats at Headquarters.
-
EU Directives appear to have an inhibiting effect on
rapid diagnosis and efficient action when disease
outbreaks occur and should be reviewed
Sept 1 - 7 ~ in January 1999 the Drummond report had recommended five areas of improvement for the State Veterinary Field Service to improve its state of readiness in the event of an outbreak of disease such as foot and mouth
Training -
Contingency Planning -
Infected Premises Work -
Use of IT in Outbreak Control -
Staffing and Direction
In each case, Richard Drummond suggested the formation of working groups to take matters forward - and nothing happened. The CVO took no action.
Stark warnings were made in the Drummond Report. It predicts virtually every disaster that befell the Government in the early weeks of the FMD crisis of 2001.
Sept 1 - 7 ~"rigid and inflexible approach from the centre which caused months of unnecessary anguish."
"Dr Scudamore came under pressure to quit when inquiries into the handling of the disaster revealed that he had failed to implement fully an internal report warning that the State Veterinary Service would quickly become "overwhelmed" in the event of a major disease outbreak. .. "Particularly during the foot and mouth crisis there was a terrible atmosphere of distrust and hostility caused by the intransigence of people in Whitehall, of which he was a senior part, who refused to accept the advice of the people at the sharp end.
....We were getting this very rigid and inflexible approach from the centre which caused months of unnecessary anguish.
......"
See news page
See also the Drummond Report
This reference to the LeBrecht report (a report in 1994 which resulted in swingeing cuts to the SVS) shows that the Chief Veterinary Officer at the time (Mr Keith Meldrum, James Scudamore's predecessor) warned the Permanent Secretary that if these SVS staff cuts recommended in the LeBrecht report went ahead, it would be impossible for the UK to handle an extensive outbreak of disease.
Sept 1 - 7 ~ The power to panic: the Animal Health Act 2002
The revised paper by Professor David Campbell and Professor Robert Lee may now be accessed from the Technical/Scientific pages of warmwell.
This paper was first published as an analysis piece in the Autumn 2003
issue of Public Law, [2003] P.L. 382Extract: "Executive contempt for Parliament is such common contemporary currency
that one would hardly dare trouble the readers of this journal by seeking to
bring another example of it to their attention. However, the Animal Health
Act 2002 ("2002 Act") displays "an aura of arrogance" in the way it persists
with a discredited policy that will be found striking even by this case-hardened
readership. During the foot and mouth disease (FMD) epidemic of 2001, the
government engaged in ultra vires action on a huge scale, for it had no power
to slaughter perhaps the majority of the 7 million animals it nevertheless did
slaughter in the course of the "contiguous cull" which became the core of its
disease control policy......"
Sept 1 - 7 ~ "It is patently clear that GIS and handheld wireless computers are the way we all should be moving...too often there is a game script that is played out whatever the players do or not do."
On the question of FMD simulation "war games" currently taking place in Scotland, Martin Hugh-Jones writes:
"Little I can add that hasn't been said before. It is patently clear that GIS and handheld wireless computers are the way we all should be moving, with the data held in omni-available but secure databases.
War games are run at various levels. The ones in Washington have too often been run at the highest levels to confirm that each agency is in communication with every other agency within the beltway. Rather like the ancient gods in the heavens talking to each other and ignoring what is going on way down on the plain among the peasants.
In this day and age it should be possible to set up a realistic computer based war-game in which the actions taken quantitatively affect, negatively or positively, the outcomes at each stage with suitably built-in time delays. Even with a table top version this should be possible. Unfortunately too often there is a game script that is played out whatever the players do or not do.
LP Smith used to construct a very simple downwind search strategy for the FMD wargames played in the early 1970s which utilised historic outbreaks. Fortunately, or unfortunately, those old outbreaks were usually modest and involved only a dozen or so farms. Ten years later Bracknell built a good computer model to forecast downwind spread."
Sept 1-7 ~ Those of us who went through that first half of 2001, even as at arm's length as a reporter hearing farmers cry, never want to hear or see anything like it again.
Scotsman today
".... any outbreak must be dealt with as efficiently as possible. If it threatens to go beyond one or two cases then vaccination of animals must be used. It should be possible "next time" because of lessons learned "last time". ...This week's exercise, involving rural environment and development department headquarters at Pentland House in Edinburgh, the department's area office in Perth, the Scottish Environment Protection Agency, police, NFU, local authority staff, Scottish Natural Heritage, and journalists among others will indicate how well lessons have been learned."
Sept 1-7 ~ "Above all, the creation (which is a requirement in the EU FMD Directive) of "a permanently operational Expert Group ... to maintain expertise and assist the relevant authority in qualitative disease preparedness"
Mary Marshall,
Animal Health Policy Coordinator of the
European Livestock Alliance,
has written a detailed open letter entitled: FMD legal issues - some comments and suggestions
Extracts:"...
Open and accessible information .......contrast the absence of information from Defra with the detailed and timely information provided to US stakeholders, and note that the APHIS website even provides stakeholders with helpful comments to facilitate effective submissions: http://www.usaha.org/oie/oie12003.html and http://www.aphis.usda.gov/vs/ncie/oie/ .
..... Access by all to non-confidential comments sent by the public to Defra in response to their consultations. Currently these are open for inspection only at Defra HQ in London. The internet publication of the Hutton Inquiry evidence is a model of truly open access.
A revised and updated FMD Contingency Plan which takes into account individual electronic animal ID and the use of rapid portable virus diagnostic tests which can and should be linked to an updated GIS database, thus increasing the chances of prompt identification of an index case and allowing for real-time management and enabling useful post-epidemic epidemiological data analysis.
.....Above all, the creation (which is a requirement in the EU FMD Directive) of "a permanently operational Expert Group ..." Read in full
Aug 25 - 31 ~ A footnote on the Janet Hughes story
Janet Hughes was asked by the BBC in Wales to comment on the report by professors Lee and Campbell Carnage by Computer: The Blackboard Economics of the 2001 Foot and Mouth Epidemic SeeTechnical/Scientific papers page. She writes, "I felt proud to be asked. It was live and I was so glad to be able to get the point across that the Animal Health Act 2002 gives DEFRA the legal powers that they did not have in 2001. " More
Aug 25 - 31 ~ Carwyn Jones says, " We did what we did in the interests of most farmers" and, of the Lee/Campbell report, " I don't think it has any value for any future control of the disease"
Carwyn Jones and NFU Wales president Peredur Hughes pour scorn on Carnage by Computer: The Blackboard Economics of the 2001 Foot and Mouth Epidemic by professors Lee and Campbell. (See today's article in the Western Mail.) Their views are not shared by others.
Conservative AM Glyn Davies welcomed the report, saying,"At long last we have a minor glimpse into the sheer scale of the 2001 FMD scandal, the worst example of state-sponsored slaughter and waste of money Britain has ever seen."
The article concludes with a comment from Peter Stevenson of Compassion in World Farming who said, "The report by the two Cardiff University professors is the strongest legal condemnation yet of the way the Government handled the foot-and-mouth crisis. I think this should prompt ministers to acknowledge they were wrong and it was illegal to go ahead with their policy of a contiguous cull which brought untold suffering to millions of animals and thousands of people."
Aug 25 - 31 ~" In sum, stamping out was abandoned in all but name. Mass, almost indiscriminate killing took place."
The BBC have reported, under the headline Lawyers damn FMD handling,
on the report by professors David Campbell and Bob Lee which concludes that the handling of the crisis "involved lawless action by a government on such a scale as to amount to a negation of the basic precepts of the rule of law".
...." The report, entitled Carnage by Computer: The Blackboard Economics of the 2001 Foot and Mouth Epidemic - about to published in Social and Legal Studies academic magazine ....
In fact, Professors Campbell and Lee describe the mass slaughter over 10 million farm animals as "despicably cruel."
The academic lawyers from Cardiff Law School's Centre for Business Relationships, Accountability, Sustainability and Society (BRASS), ... castigates the former Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Maff) as having completely lost its grip early on in the crisis.
It says that computer operators, sitting at their desks in London, passed the death sentence on millions of animals due to mistaken procedures and the use of a management information system not used for culls but primarily for calculating subsidies.
As a result, when an outbreak was reported on a farm, they calculated a 3 km killing zone around that farm, sometimes of up to 3km, in which all farm animals were slaughtered.
The report said: "It took no account whatever of the possible variable conditions of spread according to such factors as geography. It made no allowance for natural barriers which might restrict spread."
See http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/3184383.stm
Aug 25 - 31 ~ Colombian livestock owners are worried by the appearance last Monday of
foot and mouth disease (FMD) outbreaks.
It is close to the frontier with
Venezuela, and they fear that the disease will enter the country and that they will lose their international certification for that region.
Invertia.com quoted on the Pro-Med site
Aug 25 - 31 ~"The suppression of scientific dissent is one of the most serious and visible signs of the 'academic-industrial-military complex' at work.."
"..It goes against the very grain and essence of what science ought to be: the open, disinterested enquiry into the causes of natural processes." Extract from Chapter 4 of the new book by Dr Mae Wan Ho: "Living with the Fluid Genome"
Aug 19 - 25 ~ EU document states that scrapie is not considered to be
transmissible to humans or to pose a risk to man ....
Pro-Med posting on friday "The European Commission has issued a series of answers to a selection
of questions on Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies (TSE), the
family of illnesses that includes Creutzfeldt Jakob Disease (CJD) in
humans, Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) in cattle, and scrapie
in sheep and goats.
The document states that scrapie is not considered to be
transmissible to humans or to pose a risk to man on the basis of the
available data. European Union (EU) legislation to prevent the spread
and transmission of BSE, however, does apply also to sheep and goats
as a precautionary measure (for example, removal of specific risk
material like brain and spinal cord since 2000, and ban on feeding
mammalian meat and bone meal (MBM) to ruminants since 1994).
......
.... to date there is no evidence of the existence of BSE in
the sheep and goat population under natural conditions. ..."(read in full)
The legislation referred to, including the National Scrapie Plan, is very extensive, very invasive and destructive - and extremely expensive. Will it be reconsidered in the light of these findings?
Aug 19-25 ~ "despite the universal scare mongering over the 'hyperinfectious' nature of the prion..."
".. an impartial study of the epidemiological history of TSEs clearly demonstrates that this disease does NOT originate from animal to animal contact or through ingestion of feeds contaminated with TSE brain material. So why do the authorities continue to treat these diseases as if they solely stem from hyper-infectious origins?
....
....Despite the repeated failure of wholesale livestock slaughter/fallowing regimes to eradicate long established TSE hotspot regions in Colorado and Iceland since the 1970s, governments are still adopting this same slaughter strategy as a first choice means of control today..."
An update by Mark Purdey on his independently funded research into TSEs can be seen here. It suggests thoughtful answers to some of the persistent questions about transmissible spongiform encephalopathies
Aug 19 - 25 ~ "Although there is a need for states to be proactive in protecting
their resources, there remain more questions than answers regarding
this disease."
This was the Pro-Med moderator's comment following the posting from New Jersey (Aug 19) about the intention to test imported deer for chronic wasting disease - which of course involves slaughter, since the only current test for TSEs is by examining an animal's brain stem. The authorities want access to 100 deer to see if they have Chronic Wasting Disease. "There is no evidence the deer are infected with the disease, but state
officials said they are trying to be proactive in preventing the deadly
wildlife disease from gaining a foothold on the East Coast via New Jersey." (Pro Med site) It is encouraging to see the moderator's evident caution and his awareness that there are no certainties yet about the causes and consequences of TSEs.
Aug 19 -25 ~ Vaccine and Diagnostic Kits for FMD ready for use in Tunisia
Outbreaks of foot and mouth disease were reported in Libya
on 18 Jun 2003. By July 1 neighbouring Tunisia had set up a control system.
From the Pro-Med website: -
"Ban on the movement of animals and animal products from Libya.
- Compulsory disinfection of all vehicles arriving from Libya.
- Heightened close surveillance of all herds/flocks of susceptible species
in the area close to the border.
- Serological surveillance of animals having been in Libya at any time
during the past 3 months.
- Acquisition of a stock of vaccine against FMD virus type SAT 2 which,
upon arrival, will be used for all susceptible species in the southern and
central Governorates bordering Libya, and which, depending on how the FMD
situation in Libya develops, could be used throughout the country (the
order was placed on 23 Jun 2003 and delivery is due to take place during
the first week of July 2003).
- Acquisition of diagnostic kits for FMD virus.
- Information and a proposal to Libya on coordinated and concerted action
to control the disease..."
The Pro-Med moderator comments: "The early response of Tunisia to the developments in neighbouring Libya
should be praised. ..." The current
outbreak of foot and mouth in Libya is the first ever recorded outbreak of this particular
serotype (serotype SAT 2) north of the Sahara. The date of the last reported case was 4 July 2003. The control measures remain in force.
Aug 18 - 25 ~"...something is out of balance, that the excessive unnaturalness we force on livestock could be catching up with us"
This quotation is from the new food safety book, "The Pathological Protein: Mad Cow, Chronic Wasting, and Other Deadly Prion Diseases" (links to Amazon.co.uk)
by Philip Yam. He explains that scientists investigating BSE, vCJD and other TSE's still have far more questions than answers.
Nevertheless, assumptions are made and we see countries demanding more and more regulation. The one apparently BSE diseased cow had a huge impact on Canada's billion-dollar beef industry. Japan's economy was hit disastrously hard while the EU Animal By-products Regulation 2003
is predicted to drain billions of pounds from the UK economy as well as causing maximum inconvenience and bafflement. If the infectious prion theory is wrong and BSE is caused by unnatural conditions, bacteria, or deficiencies of diet or environment, the mass slaughter of cattle over 30 months of
age and
other measures costing the taxpayer several billion pounds were
unnecessary, while measures still being taken by governments could well be racing in the wrong direction.
Aug 18 - 25 ~ Political pressure to find a quick fix is no substitute for proper veterinary research into the causes and transmission of disease.
Japan and the U.K. have adopted the CDI method of testing for prions (see abstract of latest CDI test from Prusiner and co.) Validation of rapid diagnostic tests is urgently needed for such pathogens as the Foot and Mouth virus but in the case of ' transmissible spongiform encephalopathies' scientists should surely, in addition to testing, be re-examining the original infectious prion theory, (Prusiner's Nobel Prize notwithstanding).
Since Professor Roy Anderson and his Imperial College team published a revised estimate of the total number of victims likely to die of vCJD in the future - which, far from being the massive number originally modelled, is just 40 - it is very much harder to suggest that eating BSE infected meat can cause rogue prions to jump the species gap into humans.
TSE affected brain tissue is injected into unfortunate laboratory animals who subsequently contract TSE. The fact that classes of Alzheimer's and other neurodegenerative diseases can be transmitted in this way is ignored. Indeed, the notorious research experiments conducted by the IAH at Edinburgh could have led to slaughter of the entire sheep flock and goat herd in the UK - if the faulty labelling had not been noticed in time. The Animal Health Act would make such slaughter legal.
Independent scientists who seriously question the accepted infectious prion theory discover that funding is no longer available for their research. (See BSE/vCJD page) while the billion pound cost of trying to avoid vCJD continues across the globe. Who benefits?
Aug 15-18 ~ "Similar kits exist, but Saalmüller's version is quicker to use and costs one-fifth the price of its rivals." (Nature Aug 1 2003)
(The Nature article was referring to work at the Institute for Immunology of the Federal Research Centre for Virus Diseases of Animals in Tübingen, by Bettina-Judith Höhlich, Karl-Heinz Wiesmüller, Tobias Schlapp, Bernd Haas,
Eberhard Pfaff, and Armin Saalmüller JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY, Aug. 2003, see technical page) : "....In further experiments, the reactivity of the six peptides with sera from animals infected with different strains of FMDV was tested, and strain-independent infection-specific epitopes were identified. Thus, these results clearly demonstrate the ability of a simple peptide-based assay to discriminate between infected and conventionally FMD-vaccinated animals... .. the new peptide-based
detection system for FMDV-specific antibodies would have
clear advantages over the competition ELISA, such as the fact
that the test itself does not depend on the use of previously
inactivated FMDV and could be performed outside of special
high-security containment.
..."
On December 18 last year, on the Today programme James Naughtie said to the Chief Scientific Adviser, Professor David King,"... you still argue that the policy of vaccination..discriminating between diseased and vaccinated animals wasn't good enough....tests weren't available …"
Professor King broke in: "Absolutely right. There were no validated tests. As we sit here now there are no validated tests and of course we're all working hard towards that objective. So I, I think that that's the major message, that in future we hope to have these validated tests that would make that distinction and then we can see a different control measure coming in to force ..."
As in 2001, it is not the tests themselves that are lacking - but rather the political will to validate such tests for use in an outbreak that could happen at any time.
Aug 15-18 ~ "novel, untested policies..
unsupported by expert opinion.. may have serious ethical issues, as well as personal
consequences...."
Nick Taylor of the Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics Research Unit (VEERU) has written this review for DEFRA: "Review of the use of models in informing disease control policy
development and adjustment" (Defra website)
It points out the flawed nature of the modelling; the assumption that infectivity of an infectious farm was constant from the time of onset to end of slaughter is one important example of where things went wrong. The modellers also misunderstood the nature of the transmission of the 2001 strain of the virus. The review's conclusions echo analyses and comments made by Alan Beat, Nicola Morris, Val Lusmore and several others, all quoted on this website in the past two years.
.
Extract: pdf file opens in new window: "...Field data were not being adequately collected and analysed early in the epidemic - in
other words there was a lack of 'veterinary intelligence'....out of a total of 2,026 IPs, a definite source of
infection was only identified for 101 IPs (5%).... and early in the epidemic the number of
sources identified would have been lower... In the absence of a definite source, it was common
practice to attribute the source of infection to the nearest possible candidate IP. ...
..The first-hand experience of veterinarians on the ground was that infection was not rapidly
spreading off IPs to contiguous premises. Many of them disagreed with the CP culling policy..."
"Models can be usefully used to support the requisition of resources needed by well-tried
control measures by graphically demonstrating the possible development of an epidemic -
perhaps in the relatively short term - but not to drive novel, untested policies that are
unsupported by expert opinion, and which may have serious ethical issues, as well as personal
consequences."
Alan Beat called the use of the Imperial College model "appallingly bad science, the unquestioning acceptance of which has led to the unjustified slaughter of millions of healthy animals, and has actually hindered disease control by diverting resources away from the more important task of rapid slaughter on infected farms."
Aug 15-18 " ~ ".. failure of the peer-review process has provided a
false veneer of authenticity to the models.."
"... and empowered them to deny all challenge in parliamentary and scientific debate. "
Scientific "peers" who review each others' work check that papers are logical and make sense, but to think- as perhaps the government does - that "peer review" implies endorsement and thorough approval of scientific content would be very wide of the mark.
The writer and smallholding expert, Alan Beat, has commented on "Review of the use of models in informing disease control policy
development and adjustment",
the report for DEFRA
by
Nick Taylor.
Mr Beat says, "if I, as an informed layman, with no background whatever in epidemiology, was able to grasp and accurately describe the inherent flaws in the computer models during 2001 - why didn't David King and so many others close to the decision-making process? ... This is not an issue of my own ego, it is precisely the opposite; it is the simple fact that any ordinary person who cared to look could recognise the falsity of the modelling case for pre-emptive mass slaughter, while those in authority were not only blind to the obvious, but subsequently refused to recognise that it had been repeatedly brought to their attention.
... It is this arrogance and denial, in the face of plain common sense, that defines the entire FMD crisis .. " Read more
Aug 15-18 " ~ No Judicial Inquiry has ever been able to probe reasons
why members of a strangely interrelated inner circle of non FMD experts, with Government Chief Scientist Professor David King at their centre, were able to control policy, while those professional experts who understood the disease and its successful eradication were sidelined. It also became apparent - as Dr Ruth Watkins, BSc Hons, BFA Oxon, MBBS, MSc, MRCP, MRCPath pointed out in her submission to the RSE Inquiry
".. that the vets and MAFF officials hardly knew any virology or principles of infectious disease control and vaccination and had not sought to inform themselves on FMD virus."
But there has still been no Public Inquiry - in spite of many calls for one. The Hutton Inquiry, with its efficient pace and the quality of its questioning, shows that such an inquiry can, after all, be successfully carried out in this country. There are many who still feel as determined as ever that common sense and humanity rather than ambition should be at the heart of animal health measures. They are not likely to forget that most of the same people who led the policies of 2001 are not only still in their powerful positions but some connected to the group, such as Mark Woolhouse, still defend the 12 hour IP/48 hour 'contiguous' culling policies.
Several have received honours. Lessons learned? Best scientific advice? Not yet , and the fear that another outbreak could be met with the same ignorant and draconian measures ( now retrospectively made legal by clauses in the new Animal Health Act) would seem to be well founded. A properly constituted Expert Science Group must be in place to guide future policies.
Aug 15-18 " ~ The tired old argument about consumer resistance to vaccinated meat is referred to by NFU Wales as a "major question"
While such as the NFU and the BVA rejoiced to see the government give way on vaccination, the rest of the country suffered directly or indirectly from the government's disorganisation, its ignorance of the Drummond report and the earlier Northumberland report, its flawed mathematical models, its refusal to listen to experts in the disease and in the use of emergency vaccination, its obduracy over already existing rapid diagnosis tests. The postcode slaughter policies led to misery in the rural community, unhealthy collusion between vets and government, animal welfare considerations being brutally ignored, bully-boy tactics towards livestock owners and objectors to the slaughter, a breakdown of trust - and literally billions of wasted pounds. If there were signs that lessons had really been learned, this website would have closed down long ago - but we continue to read such things as: "National Farmers' Union Cymru spokeswoman Leigh Roberts said, "The major question is whether retailers and consumers would accept meat from vaccinated animals." Are they really still unaware that we as consumers have been enjoying imported vaccinated meat for years and, as we heard in 2001 from Kathryn Williams,
Press Officer of the
National Consumer Council
"..the food from vaccinated beasts does not need to be labelled." See also http://cmlag.fgov.be/eng/Deirdre_Huttons_abstract.pdf
Even the FSA has, on its website, made its view loudly and clearly. It was Elliot Morley himself who said 6 Nov 2002 "..It is ironic that when vaccination was being considered during the epidemic, some of the product that came into this country to make up the shortfall was vaccinated. Consumers are not concerned about vaccination as long as it has been demonstrated to be safe, and as long as bodies such as the Food Standards Agency have looked into it in some detail."
August 15-18 " ~ Janet Hughes sees limited light at the end of a long tunnel
"This Defra business looks as if it is coming to an end at last. .." writes Janet Hughes who, readers will remember, has paid heavily for her attempts in 2001 to save the Brecon Beacons sheep and later her challenges against the legality a new draconian slaughter policy. "In response to a letter from the solicitor informing Defra's legal department that I had secured public funding to return to court to revoke the writ, Defra wrote back with an offer to accept £4,000. They seem extremely angry that I was granted legal aid.
The £4,000 must be as a result of their having read that there was £4,000 in the trust fund. ... Payment will be on the assurance that the writ is null and void, and that there will be no further attempts of enforcement of any more costs. Defra will also be informed that the payment is from the fund of donations. They have referred to this fund in their most recent letter.
So Defra's argument of having no option but to take my possessions to recover taxpayers' money will be seen to be completely spurious. .."
Aug 13 ~ Warmwell.com is enjoying a short break
..but will be back in a few days.
Aug 7 ~ "Special Advisers" to MAFF - with all necessary authority and credentials - were compelling decent public servants to act in a wholly reprehensible manner... "
Mark Brook has made available on the internet his Allegations, Disinformation and Rumours: Some comments and questions in which he re-examines events leading to the admission of the presence of Foot and Mouth disease in February 2001, the reasons behind the bed and breakfasting of sheep, the likely source of the FMD virus in this country, the importance of the use of the Official Secrets Act, the advantages to the authorities of large scale livestock slaughter (particularly the neutralisation of what one of MAFF's spokespersons sneeringly referred to as "the rural nutters' cartel "), the finding of a fall-guy, the illogicality of the idea that illegally imported foodstuffs infected the "index" farm, some serious suggestions of deliberate infection alongside the debunking of popular myths of the time, and finally, the distraction of the terrible events of September 11 2001. It is an interesting and serious account that deserves to be read in full.
"....Had the disease been publicly declared during early December and the Northumberland Enquiry recommendations implemented IN FULL, the following year's carnival of blood, mud and fire would have been a very muted, short-lived affair...
..."Special Advisers" to MAFF - with all necessary authority and credentials - were compelling decent public servants to act in a wholly reprehensible manner.
Numerous instances occurred where vets, seconded to MAFF, were coerced into committing actions which were in clear breach of their ethical code. Due to Official Secrets Act enforcement, the full story of how the veterinary profession was defiled may never be told.... ..."
Mr Brook appears to feel convinced that there will, in the end, be a fully independent Public Enquiry into the events of 2001. Numerous demands and pleas for such an Enquiry have fallen on defr ears.
Aug 4 ~ The NFU and its anti-vaccination line
From Corporate Watch
"....
small farming groups had tried to get past the NFU and MAFF and in to see Blair to argue against mass slaughter. They gave up after 'hitting the proverbial brick wall'. Indeed, many farmers in favour of vaccination felt totally let down by the NFU's position. Dr Sheila Crispin of Bristol University's veterinary department, argues that the NFU 'did not represent those farmers at the heart of the crisis" and how its spokesmen were so "woefully ignorant" on this issue that "they should not have entered the debate". It is very likely that a majority of NFU members supported vaccination but were not listened to.
Over a year later, in April 2002, Ben Gill was unrepentant. Despite the pain and suffering that was caused both to animals and farmers by the mass slaughter, he still claimed 'he won a major victory for farmers by changing the government's mind about vaccination'. .." Read in full
The CorpWatch.org article also quotes from this website. Sean Rickard's views seen from the point of view of one of the farmers about whom he wrote, "There is nothing that can or should be done to save them" (Mr Rickard was a former economic advisor to the NFU and New Labour appear to be much taken with his 'neo-liberal' approach. )
Aug 1-4 ~ "the campaign to eradicate it by hundreds of Defra inspectors is based on hysterical over-reaction...."
From Booker's Notebook in the Sunday Telegraph
"... Britain's plant experts have been keeping quiet for months: that an American plant disease, supposedly deadly to oak trees, has in fact been harmlessly endemic in British shrubs for years, and that the campaign to eradicate it by hundreds of Defra inspectors is based on hysterical over-reaction....
...Mr Williams of Caerhays, a near neighbour to Heligan, decided the moment had come to speak out against the "fatuity" of Defra's officials, who appear to have "discovered a new way to destroy another part of Britain's countryside".
What is particularly chilling, as Mr Williams points out, is that not one of the attempts to infect a British oak trees with the harmful organism has been successful. Meanwhile Defra seems so oblivious to the damage it is inflicting that, although its "impact assessment" estimates the costs of the EU law to British growers at £1-£2 million a year, this relates only to the cost of additional paperwork.
.... Dr Stephen Hunter, head of the Plant Health Division in York,... explained that Defra could not pay compensation for losses resulting from action to prevent diseases, since these were "taken for the benefit of the industry and the environment". (Dr Hunter seemed to have forgotten that Defra had just paid £3 billion to compensate farmers whose animals were destroyed for the same reason during the foot and mouth crisis.)
...."
Aug 1-4 ~ "..these results clearly demonstrate the ability of a simple peptide-based assay to discriminate between infected and conventionally FMD-vaccinated animals."
Article today in Nature about the the Hvhlich, Wiesm|ller, Schlapp, Haas, Pfaff,1 and Saalmüller paper in the Journal of Virology To Differentiate between Infected and Vaccinated Cattle "... Antibodies recognizing these peptides could be detected only in sera derived from infected cattle. In further experiments, the reactivity of the six peptides with sera from animals infected with different strains of FMDV was tested, and strain-independent infection-specific epitopes were identified. Thus, these results clearly demonstrate the ability of a simple peptide-based assay to discriminate between infected and conventionally FMD-vaccinated animals. "
We note that Professor Woolhouse, who has always maintained that "culling is simply far quicker and vaccines are not designed to interrupt transmission nor to stop an ongoing epidemic in its tracks", comments in the Nature article that the test is not specific or sensitive enough: "It's possible that you'd be using this test on millions of animals," he says." Even if it's 99.9% effective, that means you could misdiagnose a lot of them." But the point is surely that the remaining scientific objection to vaccination - that it could hide an already infected animal and prevent effective monitoring of the spread of the FMD virus - is solved by such a test. Vaccination can be used to reduce virus circulation, whilst authorities are still capable of monitoring spread. The discriminatory test precludes massive preventive culling of healthy animals and reduces the culling to only those farms indeed infected. We suggest a study of http://www.warmwell.com/vacctransmar8.htm and welcome comments. Even if certain "misdiagnosed" animals were to slip through the net as Woolhouse suggests and came into contact with a vaccinate, the worst that can be expected is some virus multiplication in the throat. Such an animal would itself be extremely unlikely to infect another animal, and so the chain dies out within that farm.
Aug 1-4 ~ Pirbright's FMD review
Foot-and-mouth disease: scientific problems and recent progress
1st annual report (2003) prepared for DEFRA, Science Directorate (a 37 page pdf document which loads in a new window) Extract:"
Use of a portable real-time
reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay for rapid detection of foot-and-mouth
disease virus. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 220(11):1636-42.
..... a portable real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
assay designed to detect all 7 viral serotypes of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV)...... Samples from animals and tissue cultures were assayed for
infectious virus and viral RNA. RESULTS: The assay detected viral RNA representing all 7 FMDV serotypes
grown in tissue culture but did not amplify a panel of selected viruses that included those that
cause vesicular diseases similar to FMD; thus, the assay had a specificity of 100%, depending on the panel
selected. The assay also met or exceeded sensitivity of viral culture on samples from experimentally infected
animals. In many instances, the assay detected viral RNA in the mouth and nose 24 to 96 hours before the onset
of clinical disease.
CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The assay reagents are produced in a
vitrified form, which permits storage and transportation at ambient temperatures. The test can be performed in 2
hours or less on a portable instrument, thus providing a rapid, portable, sensitive, and specific method for
detection of FMDV...."
Aug 1 ~ The Effect of Government Policies on the Communities and Economy of Rural Britain.
Read in full
Aug 1 ~ Defra is ordering the
mass burning of affected plants.
" In a move which has
disturbing echoes of the foot and mouth crisis, Defra is ordering the
mass burning of affected plants." The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs fears
Phytophthora Ramorum, known as Sudden Oak Death, is spreading throughout
the countryside. The disease mainly affects rhododendrons and viburnums,
but has now been discovered in yew saplings.
Charles Williams, owner of Caerhays Castle, in east Cornwall, and
Burncoose Nurseries, near Redruth, and a member of the British
Rhododendron Society, accused the Government of overreacting. He said
the disease is endemic and not overly harmful.
He said: "The whole thing is an absolute scandal. They (Defra) have no
scientific evidence that is worth a fig. They are charging in and
destroying everything without consulting owners and gardeners.
.......we all know what a shambles it was the last time they closed down
a part and tried to burn things." ....Philip Macmillan-Browse, horticultural director at Heligan, said that
staff have already had to burn three rhododendrons.
But he too said he felt Defra's methods were an overreaction. "Everyone
was jumping up and down in the early stages but people have now found
out that this is more widespread than they thought and has been here for
a lot longer," he said. "This has been around in Cornwall and Devon for
at least a decade and the whole thing is a bit pointless. It looks as
though this strain is rarely lethal and the bits of the plant affected
will just die off."
Uncanny and frustrating reminders of FMD overreaction in this story from the Western Morning News.
July 29 ~ scientific membership should be more inclusive and less exclusive.
"I was shocked, but after very brief reflection not surprised, to learn from the "Lessons Learned" Inquiry that Pirbright had not been consulted during the preparation of MAFF's FMD Contingency Plan" wrote Profesor T H Pennington, Professor of Bacteriology, University of Aberdeen in a Memorandum to the same Committee.
"... It is vital that lessons must be learned from these events. Policy makers must learn how to make the best use of scientific information. After all, our Nobel Prize track record shows that for basic science we are second to none. But it will not be enough for scientific advisory committees to follow the Nolan rules, have a few more members representing consumer interests, and to have their formal meetings in public. Their scientific membership should be more inclusive and less exclusive. The BSE Inquiry showed the importance of policy makers getting advice from scientists with detailed knowledge of the problems being addressed - and the bad consequences of not doing this. This is not being done as well as it should or could...."
It is of the most vital importance that the EU Directive's requirement to create an Expert Group results in the inclusion of at least some people who will know about new developments in diagnostics and vaccination.
July 29 ~ a "quick and organised veterinary response" to any future disease outbreak.
Ben Bradshaw spoke yesterday of the proposal that private sector vets would be contracted to do five days paid training each year and would need to make themselves available in an emergency. The government would initially seek to recruit around 100 vets to join this veterinary reserve. Proposals are being put out to consultation along with a wider review of the system of local veterinary inspectors and will run until 25 October. See UKonline article
This proposal is an attempt to follow Royal Society recommendation exactly one year ago that "... DEFRA should take rapid action to investigate and improve:
......the training of temporary and local veterinary inspectors by DEFRA, with the RCVS, the BVA and its species divisions.."
July 29 ~ "government departments do not have sufficient scientific expertise"
the old belief that scientists should not have to justify their work to the public is rapidly losing ground. Whilst basic research may be considered ethically neutral, the potential applications of that research may not be so, and scientists have an obligation to engage in dialogue with the public.
Disclosing the source of funding when publishing scientific work should probably be encouraged, and a number of journals are moving towards this policy. But a more important issue is probably the suppression of negative or commercially unsatisfactory results from research funded by industry. " From a Memorandum submitted by the Biosciences Federation to the Lords' Select Committee on Science and Technology
July 29 ~ " we neglect the study of animal sources of infection at our peril "
Fighting infectious disease (link to Veterinary Record) "The Lords' Select Committee on Science and Technology has a long history of highlighting issues where more attention is needed. Its report on infectious disease continues that tradition and its points are well made."
'we neglect the study of animal sources of infection at our peril',....... general practitioners are underused in disease surveillance. This is also true in the veterinary field, and it is to be hoped that this can be rectified as DEFRA's surveillance strategy is finalised.
Despite the requirements, and the efforts being made to improve collaboration, the report paints a picture of a system that is under-resourced and, in many respects, fragmented.
.... responsibility for surveillance is spread across a number of agencies, which rely on different databases....... information between laboratories cannot be shared because they do not have common data sets or standards...... highlighting the need for a 'joined-up' approach, the report recommends that the recently formed Health Protection Agency 'be provided with resources to take on specific and primary responsibility for integrating surveillance related to human, animal and foodborne infection at national, regional and local levels, in order to bridge the gaps that currently exist between these areas of speciality.'
Noting that lines of communication and accountability are unclear, it further recommends that the minister for public health should publish, as a matter of urgency, a document outlining the roles and responsibilities of all organisations involved in infectious disease services.... highlights the fact that international collaboration is needed if it is to be tackled effectively. .......
July 29 ~" The cost of moving to better welfare is often assumed to be greater than it is."
From the Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Minutes of Evidence Memorandum submitted by Compassion in World Farming (X10)
16. On the basis of these figures, we could change from battery to free-range eggs for just ¤2.70 per person per year, provided that retailers charged no more extra for free-range eggs than is needed to cover their additional production costs. Similarly, changing from battery to barn eggs would add just ¤1.49 to each person's annual expenditure on eggs, subject to the above proviso about retailers' prices.
17. In short, consumers could take the burden from farmers and absorb the cost of moving from battery cages to free-range at a cost of just 5.2 pence each per week. The equivalent figure for a change from battery to barn eggs is just 2.9 pence per person per week.
18. There is strong evidence that consumers are willing to pay extra for better welfare eggs. A supermarket survey carried out by CIWF Trust in 2001 found that in the case of five supermarkets, 50% or more of their egg sales were non-cage eggs, ie free-range, barn or organic.
However, the supermarket retailers - unless "encouraged" to by governmentand public opinion - will not want to cooperate if it affects their profits in even a marginal way. Farmers are fearful of being blacklisted if they ever complain about supermarkets - whose power is a disgrace. See below
July 29 ~ "very real fear of retaliatory action"
(WMN) "...In evidence to the Commons Rural Affairs (EFRA) committee, Lord Whitty said
that in his personal view the code" (The Supermarket Code which the Government is committed to reviewing annually) "is not working, and it is not
working partly because people are afraid to put their head above the
parapet". He also said that the costs of higher welfare standards were
disproportionately borne by farmers who were unable to pass costs on to
the supermarkets.....
...Cornish farmer Michael Hart, who runs the Small and Family Farms
Alliance, said: "For once in his life, Lord Whitty is right. Farmers are
terrified to complain because they know they will be blacklisted by the
supermarkets concerned, and once you are blacklisted by one you are
blacklisted by all the others.
"I get at least a couple of phone calls a week from farmers who have
been treated unfairly by supermarkets, but they are so powerful and
terrifying that no one is prepared to challenge them.
"I had one farmer who had an entire pallet of cabbages rejected because
a slug was found on the underside of the pallet. And because they change
their specifications on packaging overnight, farmers can be left with
£20,000 worth of bags that are totally useless and they are told it's
their tough luck."
Mr Hart said he backed the introduction of an independent regulator to
police the code. And he said the code should be extended down the supply
chain so that the many farmers who sell their goods to the supermarkets'
main suppliers are also covered...." article in the Western Morning News
July 29 ~ 100% of Canadian Farmers do not want GM wheat to be licensed after their experiences with rape and other GM crops
"On 9th July Sheepdrove arranged a meeting with three Canadian Farmers and Michael Hart of The Small and Family Farmers Alliance. The purpose of this was for the Canadian Farmers to describe their experiences of growing GMOs in North America and allow local farmers to ask questions. .." Please see link to Sheepdrove on warmwell's GM page
July 28 ~ New money found for fallen stock scheme - and DEFRA's 50% take-up demand is dropped
"The fallen stock scheme for farmers, proposed by the Government last spring, is back on track and will start operating from next January. The national scheme for the collection and disposal of fallen stock from farms will be voluntary and jointly financed by subscriptions from farmers and a 310 million Government contribution in the first year.It is Defra's response to the European Union's Animal By-Products regulation, which banned the routine on-farm burial of animal carcasses from May this year.When the scheme was first proposed Defra said it could only work if 50per cent of livestock farmers signed up to join. But by the deadline only 34 per cent had signed up officially - and the ensuing row saw claims by farmers that Defra had not sent application forms to the right people and had also failed to take into account that farmers might each have several holding numbers for parcels of land and would, naturally, only be applying for one.Now more money has been found and the scheme is back - the only difference being that Defra has a new category of large livestock farms, which will be expected to pay more." Western Morning News link
July 24 ~" Margaret Beckett's department is not operating efficiently
and is still
failing to recruit and retain staff with the right mix of skills, a
committee of MPs said yesterday." Robert Uhlig in the Telegraph
"An all-party Commons committee delivered a withering assessment of the
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs' performance, although it
conceded that its latest departmental report showed a great improvement over
2002.
It said: "Our principal concern continues to be that Defra lacks the
capacity to deliver adequately across its very broad remit and particularly
that it lacks the ability to recruit and retrain staff with the right
mixture of skills."
The MPs were told by Sir Brian Bender, Defra's permanent secretary, that the
skills required of civil servants had changed a great deal in the past 30
years. He said leadership, project management skills and the ability to work
in partnership with others had become increasingly important.
But the MPs said yesterday: "The report does not adequately reflect this,
and does not explain what Defra is doing to ensure these partnerships work
effectively...."
July 23 ~ The Labour Party will attempt to relaunch its image in the countryside
this autumn by staging a one-day rural summit - in London.
Western Morning News "...The event,
which was immediately dubbed a "gimmick" by political opponents last
night, is designed to boost Labour's battered image in the countryside
as the run-up to the next General Election gets under way.
It will feature a series of workshops, speeches and other events on
issues ranging from affordable housing to rural transport.
Rural Affairs Minister Alun Michael said that with 180 MPs representing
rural or semi-rural seats, Labour "is now the leading party of rural, as
well as urban and metropolitan, Britain"......
.....Paul Tyler, Lib-Dem MP for North Cornwall, was sceptical about the value
of the event.
He said: "A one-day summit in the autumn may be good for the spin
doctors, but it will not do any good for rural Britain...the alibi of blaming it all on the Tories will not wash - Labour
has been in power for more than six years now."
...."
July 23 ~ Spiralling debts and plummeting membership has forced the NFU to close their London HQ and sell off property (including Ben Gill's presidential style flat in Covent Garden.)
" The last straw (for British farming) came during the 2001 foot and mouth disaster. As the obscurantist alliance against vaccination led by Gill and Professor Roy Anderson brought the livestock industry to its knees, the NFU played a central part in creating the most pointlessly destructive crisis Bitish farming has ever faced" Muckspreader's Down on the Farm column, Private Eye.
July 20/21 ~ "Dark actors playing games"
The parallels between the present situation and the 2001 Foot and Mouth tragedy are becoming more and more haunting. No-one, as yet, seems to have asked the question - "Why did Dr Kelly feel the need to speak out?" Presumably because he could no longer accept the Government putting up 'false science' to justify its position.
Dr Kelly's suicide has plunged the nation into a long-overdue consideration of government arrogance and the role of the media in challenging it.
In an e-mail message to a reporter for The New York Times shortly before he left on his walk on Thursday, Dr. Kelly discussed his appearance before the committee and referred to "many dark actors playing games."
While Mr Blair may be sincere, the New Statesman article this week suggests that he may also be "a psychopath capable of reinventing himself with remarkable dexterity, like an actor." (See democracy page)
On a lesser scale, this could be said to be true of many others - as we saw in Andrew Mackinlay, apparently under the delusion that the Foreign Affairs Select Committee was a sort of High Court, when he told Dr Kelly he must answer all questions. Dr Kelly stood his ground with dignity - but most people haven't got access to the knowledge that enables them to withstand bluff and bullying.
Not one but 60 farmers and stockholders committed suicide during the hectoring insanity of the foot and mouth crisis. In the rural community the massive loss of confidence in any kind of sound common sense in carpeted, disassociated Whitehall dates from this time or even earlier. In spite of massive calls for an full public independent inquiry there was no such thing. The Royal Society did its best - but even there, vital recommendations have been ignored. Even now, for example, there is no proper vaccination protocol produced. Current thinking in DEFRA ignores huge advances in rapid diagnosis. No practical lessons have been learned by government yet. Will this present hand-wringing result in anything more healthy?
July 19/20 ~ Pressure to break up DEFRA intensifies
Lord Haskins' conclusion that DEFRA is over-centralised (See FWi) echoes an important speech by Charles Kennedy last week to the Social Market Foundation (link to Guardian) Mr Kennedy said that public spending should be slimmed and a number of departments abolished.
"The central command and control approach has failed Britain. It has failed to promote efficiency and failed to foster fairness.
"It's time for a fresh approach. It's time that we restructured Britain's government so that it is part of the solution to Britain's problems, not part of the problem itself.
It's time to sound the death knell for the old departments set up to defend the interests of producers - departments which have only succeeded in presiding over the decline of the industries which they have tried to serve."
..."Defra could go the same way -- with a new department of environment and transport taking responsibility for rural issues. How much money would this free up?"
July 19/20 ~ "bad practice at a pig farm" led to the foot and mouth crisis says Ben Bradshaw.
Reported in the Western Morning News "Alison Hawes, South West spokeswoman for the Countryside Alliance,
praised Mr Bradshaw for stopping to talk to the protesters but condemned
his comments about foot and mouth disease. She said: "I think it shows
complete ignorance of the job that he is employed to do."
July 18 ~The government's eight-week national dialogue on genetically
modified organisms draws to a close today amid widespread criticism
of the way it was organised.
But Unilever, the Co-op and the
Consumers' Association and Greenpeace are to launch their own public forum; an "independent GM citizens' jury". See Reuters report: " Greenpeace's chief policy advisor Charlie Kronick said the public's
views would be more fairly represented by the eight-week-long initiative
than at the government's hearings.
"The public have been subjected to a barrage of propaganda courtesy of
GM advocates as well as sceptics," Kronick said.
"This is a chance for the government to hear the real concerns of real
people," he added. See GM page
July 17/18 ~ 70 per cent of fallen stock is taken, free, by hunts, but with a
ban on hunting looming that option would no longer be available to
farmers.
Western Morning News (external link) ".... news that
disposing of fallen stock through a central collection service was
likely to cost more than originally proposed under the Government's
fallen stock collection scheme, which would have cost large farms £200 a
year and smallholders £50 a year.
The Department for Environment, Farming and Rural Affairs (Defra) has
suggested that due to a lack of response the scheme - brought in because
of a European Union ban of on-farm burials - will be unable to go ahead
at the original charges it proposed.
"We are consulting industry interests on the possibility of a revised
scheme," said Defra in a letter to Trading Standards. "However, this
does not alter the fact that there is already sufficient capacity at
knackers' yards, hunt kennels, maggot farms, incinerators and rendering
plants for the disposal of fallen stock."
About 70 per cent of fallen stock is taken, free, by hunts, but with a
ban on hunting looming that option would no longer be available to
farmers.
And suggestions that regional schemes could operate in areas where
response was above 50 per cent in favour - including parts of the
Westcountry - have been dismissed as unworkable ...."
"...Vets' bills, too, have risen, with many smaller farmers now unhappy
about calling in a vet when in the past they would have done so as a
matter of course...."
Scotland has delayed implementation of the animal by-product rules which would have banned on-farm burials by August 1.
The new rules will now come into force by October 1, the Scottish Executive said today.
July 17/18 ~ The levels of bureaucracy are absolutely ludicrous, and very
expensive
Western Morning News (external link) "...Form-filling for various government agencies takes up one whole day a
week for Cornish organic farmer James Moon. He reckons he spends at
least 400 hours a year with paperwork for no fewer than 21 agencies.
Mr Moon, who farms 250 acres just south of Liskeard, is concerned that
farmers who sign up for schemes will find themselves at the beck and
call of inspectors without warning.
"If you say it's inconvenient, they go away complaining that you have
refused them entry when they have a right to see what's going on, and
that you'll be in trouble," he explained.
"It's a one-way process to a large extent, as the Rural Payments Agency,
for example, is always well behind on payments to the farmers ....
They fob you off all the time. For two months I was told the payment I
was chasing would be made within a fortnight."
He said individual visits to his farm by inspectors did not cost much in
man hours, but added up they came to a very sizeable amount - and time
cost money.
"The levels of bureaucracy are absolutely ludicrous, and very
expensive," he added.
On the chart he prepared showing how much time was spent on form-filling
and visits for schemes, the most hours were taken up by the British
Cattle Movement Service with cattle passports and movements, the RPA on
the beef special premium, the Organic Farming Scheme and Organic
Certification. Each took up about 50 hours.
"Obviously if we are expected to pay for epidemics it will just add to
our burden of expenses," he said..."
July 17 ~ " Is Lord Whitty aware that "SAT 2 is of concern because as a serotype it has a reputation for being highly contagious and antigenically diverse"
writes Mary Marshall, Animal Health Policy Coordinator
of the European Livestock Alliance
"May I," she writes, "suggest for your consideration, some points arising from this debate?
It is puzzling that Lord Whitty should begin by saying that "We are satisfied that the existing plans and precautions are sufficient for the relatively low threat from Libya." Yet, on further questioning Lord Whitty admitted that "In terms of the strain of the disease, the virus in Libya is SAT 2 which has never been recorded in North Africa previously."
Is he aware that "SAT 2 is of concern because as a serotype it has a reputation for being highly contagious and antigenically diverse" (personal email from David Paton, IAH-Pirbright, 15 July 2003)?
Since, as Lord Whitty says, this serotype "has never been recorded in North Africa", let alone in Europe, it "may have implications in the epidemiology and clinical picture of the disease" (Paul Roger, letter to the Vet Record 7 July 2003). Does this not increase the potential risk that it may arrive here and spread undetected? Lord Whitty has not adequately answered Lord Plumb's question: "Will extra surveillance be instituted and targeted where risks are highest?"
I suggest that it is now time for an informed debate on what surveillance strategy would be most effective. The risks that widespread testing, e.g. using portable rapid diagnostic tests and testing milk at collection, could close down the UK with false positives must be set against considering that "the cost of 3-7 days national stoppage cannot be more than the cost of that number of days of free movement by viraemic animals." (personal email from Prof Martin Hugh-Jones, 6 March 2003)...
...To say now that vaccine is sufficient suggests that Defra have modelled the distribution of size of outbreaks and populations to be vaccinated. Has this been done?
I suggest that this current threat needs increased attention, and collaboration from and with all sectors.
." (Read in full)
July 17 ~ The harder things get the more our noses are to the grindstone trying to survive.
Farmer Pat Bryant writes, "Most farmers I know do their very best for their livestock and try their absolute best to comply with the regulations - some of which are contradictory.... we are isolated. The family farmer is so darned overworked trying to care for his livestock (often single handed) and keep body and soul together that he does not have time for NFY/TFA/FARM/FFA meetings - he barely has time or energy to read the Farmers Weekly after he has completed all of the Defra/MAFF paperwork
We don't have time or energy to be out there picking up on what is happening - who is saying and doing what.
The harder things get the more our noses are to the grindstone trying to survive....."
July 16/17 ~ ".. we have had to live with all these
rubbish regulations which have done nothing to improve profits, and all
our exports have been driven away because of mis-handling by our
Government."
Those interviewed in the Western Morning News article FARMERS' ANGER AT TAX ON DISEASES appear to assume, as wrongly as does the government, that the source of FMD has been established and proved. We regret this. However, the people interviewed show how they feel at the proposals (see below) to levy new charges on the farming community to help cover the cost of future outbreaks of foot and mouth
and other diseases
"Ian Johnson, regional spokesman for the National Farmers' Union,
said the Government should first do more to prevent diseases like foot
and mouth entering the country.......The point remains that many of these diseases come from beyond our
shores and are, to a certain degree, allowed in because of a lack of
care and concern taken from Government. Mr Johnson added that it was doubtful whether farmers would be able to
get insurance to cover the cost of something like the 2001 foot and
mouth outbreak, which cost the taxpayer £3 billion.
..... Steve Bucknell who raises Aberdeen Angus cows and sheep at Trevarthian,
Kestle Mill, near Newquay, said that by charging farmers for disease
costs the Government is implying farmers are guilty of starting the
disease.....
Where have the Government been in the last five years? We had foot and
mouth,.....and we have had to live with all these
rubbish regulations which have done nothing to improve profits, and all
our exports have been driven away because of mis-handling by our
Government."
July 16/17 ~
Ministers will press ahead with plans for a compulsory levy on farmers to
help pay for any outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease
said Ben Bradshaw yesterday.
From The Financial Times
" The principle of sharing the costs of any slaughter policy remained widely
accepted despite the opposition of the National Farmers' Union, he said.
("widely accepted" by whom?)
"The compensation bill during the 2001 outbreak totalled £1.34bn, prompting
the Treasury to insist farmers bear part of the costs of future outbreaks of
FMD and other notifiable diseases. The idea of an insurance scheme has been
dropped after insurers warned premiums would be prohibitively high"
Under the terms of the amended Animal Health Act, " any animals the Secretary of State thinks should be slaughtered with a view to preventing the spread of foot-and-mouth disease" may be killed. Their owners will have little or no power to protest whether they deem this reasonable or not.
The Secretary of State may exercise the power whether or not animals-
- are affected with foot-and-mouth disease or suspected of being so affected;
- are or have been in contact with animals so affected;
- have been exposed to the infection of foot-and-mouth disease;
- have been treated with vaccine against foot-and-mouth disease."
Lord Whitty may (see below) consider and then reject a vaccination scheme, on the grounds of low stocks of vaccine or inappropriate conditions. ANNEX XVII of the new EU Directive demands among other measures for each Member State that "Detailed plans shall be available for emergency vaccination." These have yet to appear. "A coherent and transparent plan for dealing with the next outbreak of FMD to occur in this country is still awaited..." wrote Paul Roger in a letter to the Veterinary Times that should be on the desk of every official with responsibility for animal disease.
July 16 ~ Consider this: "We would then, provided the vaccine was appropriate to the strain, consider as a first priority the use of preventive vaccination"
From the House of Lords yesterday, a question from Lord Plumb about the SAT2 strain of FMDV in Libya, asked just before the debate on the Criminal Justice Bill ( for which, see democracy page) :
Baroness Byford: My Lords, perhaps I may press the Minister further -- he did not actually answer my question. If a foot and mouth outbreak occurred again in this country, is it the fact that vaccination would not be the first choice of priority and that slaughter still would be so?
Lord Whitty: My Lords, as the noble Baroness, who has sat through many of these debates, will recognise, the contingency plan, which we have established here and would be broadly followed by other EU countries, would see the slaughter of diseased animals and those immediately exposed. We would then, provided the vaccine was appropriate to the strain, consider as a first priority the use of preventive vaccination. It would not necessarily be appropriate in all circumstances, but that is the order of priority in the current contingency plan. "
On the subject of vaccine to combat the SAT2 strain of the foot and mouth disease virus, Lord Whitty said: "...we have sufficient vaccine to deal with an outbreak of this strain. Clearly, more will be produced, but that is not to say that every strain of foot and mouth disease is covered by vaccine stocks in Britain or Europe. "
July 15/16 ~ Plans for sheep cull under a scrapie plan that has become mandatory
(Farmers Weekly) "Officials are gearing up for new EU measures on scrapie eradication which will come into force on Oct 1. The measures will be statutory unlike the National Scrapie Plan which is voluntary.... DEFRA confirmed that its Procurement Division was investigating contracts with incineration firms to see if they could take scrapie-susceptible sheep."
Elliot Morley has written to the MP of sheep farmer Lawrence Wright : "We can assure Mr Wright that there are no plans for a large scale cull beyond those in the public domain to deal with potential animal disease outbreaks or, if there were to be evidence of BSE in sheep, as a possible scenario under the BSE in sheep contingency plan."
Our correspondent writes, " He added a disparaging comment about my having "got hold of some sort of modern myth!" and recommending that I need "to treat such sources of information with great caution."
He did not, however deny or explain why the enquiry was directed to our local, or other abattoirs."
But see DEFRA news release of July 11 which we reported on July 12 extract: " Changes ... pending the outcomes of further Defra funded research. ... While the NSP \ RBST genotype survey indicates that the application of genotype based breeding strategies may be appropriate for some rare breeds and clearly not for others, the results are nonetheless far from conclusive in the case of a number of these breeds."
If results are "far from conclusive" (and this can hardly be only in the case of rare breeds) then why is this scheme being allowed to continue on its juggernaut way? There are doubts - but the Directive is to be slavishly followed anyway with only the politically correct gesture towards approved "rare breeds". Is Mr Wright not justified in feeling a sense of foreboding for his flock? Did they narrowly escape the FMD holocaust only to be sacrificed to the EU scare about a BSE/ vCJD epidemic that has never materialised - if they are "scrapie-susceptible"? The blame for DEFRA's action will, as usual, be put on the EU. Other more pragmatic EU members seem to manage to follow EU directives to the letter only when it is common sense to do so.
July 16 ~ Sixteen new initiatives have been unveiled today as part of an outline AnimalHealth and Welfare Strategy for Great Britain.
Sixteen. Details can be seen on the DEFRA website in Ben Bradshaw's own words..."Twenty years ago, the UK had a reputation for the highest standards of farm
animal health and welfare anywhere in the world.
The BSE and FMD episodes have tarnished that reputation.
This strategy gives us a chance to restore our name (sic) ; it is the first
comprehensive, coherent strategy of its kind, pulling together the work of Government
and the leading organisations in the field...."
July 15 ~" ..another grave charge would be personally ordering the
sacking of a scientist who was involved in some of the first independent
tests on GM..."
Extract from Andrew Rowell's book '"'Don't Worry It Is Safe To Eat - The True Story Of GM Food,
BSE, And Foot And Mouth' (see below) "As the UK government continues to wriggle over weapons of mass destruction,
of sexing up dossiers and general spin, Tony Blair argues that there is no
greater charge against a prime minister than for him to have personally
falsified claims on which to take a country to war.
That may be so, but another grave charge would be personally ordering the
sacking of a scientist who was involved in some of the first independent
tests on GM, especially if those tests showed evidence of harm, and also
especially if the orders came from Monsanto, via the White House...."
Read extract in full
July 15 ~ "Before BSE and during the foot and mouth crisis any scientist who was
critical of what was happening was silenced, marginalised and had their
professional reputation attacked,"
...."This is happening again with biotechnology."
Are we standing on the edge of a GM abyss? asks the
Western Morning News in its review of Don't Worry It's Safe to Eat by the investigative journalist, Andrew Rowell."...the way in which eminent scientists, who raised legitimate
concerns surrounding the decision not to vaccinate cattle against the
disease and the efficacy of the contiguous cull, were ignored
demonstrated what drove Government decisions.
"Anyone who was being critical of the way it was being handled weren't
being taken seriously," said Mr Rowell, an investigative journalist.
"There were major decisions being taken that were based on brutal
economic interests and overriding common sense, consumer interests and
those of the farming industry.
"On biotechnology, Michael Meacher has come out and said the Government
is downplaying the risks and that it hasn't looked at the critical
issues.
"Now even the former environment minister can't raise legitimate
concerns about this technology without being attacked by the scientific
establishment."
The launch of his book, which took him ten months to write and which
required constant updating in response to developments, coincides with
the Government's much-criticised public consultation on the GM issue".
Read article in full.
July 14 ~ "Compare the attempts in the SARS epidemic to find and validate a diagnostic test - this was done in a few weeks, simply because there was the political will. With FMD, the powers that be are still prevaricating in validation, even though diagnostic tests were actually available before the FMD 2001 epidemic."
A letter from Anne Lambourn in response to the government's GM Nation feedback (The deadline for the contribution to the GM Nation debate is 18 July - see GM page) is a telling example of how far the ordinary concerned person feels disenchanted. Her reasons are simply stated. Extract: "we were world renowned for our scientific expertise, which was seen to be independent and of the highest calibre. That perception has now radically changed - our science/scientists are seen to be at the mercy of political and commercial interests, with the result that the true "best science" has very often bitten the dust. In the FMD epidemic, our overseas colleagues were looking at us in utter dismay and incredulity, as we proceeded to wipe out much of our livestock industry and inflict a lasting blow on the rural community...."
July 14 ~"A coherent and transparent plan for dealing with the next outbreak of FMD to occur in this country is still awaited".
A letter in the current issue of the Veterinary Record from the distinguished English vet, Paul Roger, raises urgent concern about the reluctance to use electronic identification systems and rapid diagnostic devices.
"The continued welfare unfriendly use of double tagging together with the added trauma of losses to individual farmers (currently £4.25 to replace one tag and many torn ears flapping in the wind) could be easily avoided" he writes. "The DEFRA still have not attempted to validate rapid technologies available to identify the presence or absence of FMDV in herds or flocks."
Mr Roger's letter concludes, "A coherent and transparent plan for dealing with the next outbreak of FMD to occur in this country is still awaited.
As the comment in the Vet Record of 5th July argued, the Animal Health & Welfare strategy on which so many hopes are pinned should not be allowed to fizzle out." (full letter)
July 14 ~ FMD in Libya"... International cooperation should be a priority, and awareness in the UK and Europe should be increased, with rapid diagnostic testing playing a central role"
Mary Marshall, the
Animal Health Policy Coordinator of the
European Livestock Alliance writes,
"From ProMED postings, it would appear that there is no certainty that the Libyan index case of FMD has actually been identified, only that 8 foci have been recorded so far. Also, the extent, if any, of its spread, both geographically and with regard to species other than the cattle which were sampled, is also not known. Note that there will be added difficulties in control if infection has spread to nomadic sheep and goats. Regional, and international, cooperation should be a priority. Awareness in the UK and other EU countries should be increased. Rapid diagnostic testing should play a central role - in the infected areas for management and in neigbouring areas and the EU as an early warning. Comparing this with the 2001 UK epidemic, the SAT 2 serotype of the current Libyan outbreak is less apparent in small ruminants, so it may be even more difficult to identify clinically by symptoms. We await further updates from ProMED on what measures, including vaccination, are or will be taken in Libya. It is to be hoped that, if it becomes necessary, sufficient stocks of the SAT2 vaccine would be readily available in the UK and other EU countries with no obstacles to consumption of meat from vaccinated animals.
Mary Marshall
Animal Health Policy Coordinator
European Livestock Alliance"
(See ProMED mail website) ProMED is part of the International Society for Infectious Diseases
July 12 ~ Keepers of recognised rare breeds of sheep participating in the voluntary National Scrapie Plan are now permitted to postpone the required slaughter of their most TSE susceptible breeding rams pending the outcomes of further Defra funded research.
This extension applies only to those rare breeds recognised by the RBST. See DEFRA news release extract: " Changes ....will enable keepers of recognised rare breeds of sheep participating in the voluntary National Scrapie Plan to put off, should they wish to do so, the required slaughter of their most TSE susceptible breeding rams pending the outcomes of further Defra funded research. ... While the NSP \ RBST genotype survey indicates that the application of genotype based breeding strategies may be appropriate for some rare breeds and clearly not for others, the results are nonetheless far from conclusive in the case of a number of these breeds. The impact of breeding constraints on the small genetic pool within these breeds needs to be carefully evaluated. Furthermore the extension will allow owners and societies to store genetic material from these animals."
"In recognition of this and of the genetic importance of our native rare breeds, we have commissioned a further, more detailed study. Analysis of this data should assist us in the development of appropriate longer term strategies for rare breeds.
."
... the extension will allow owners and societies to store genetic material from these animals."
.." (More)
The National Scrapie Plan addresses the theoretical possibility of BSE being present in sheep. Since the whole thing was based on the fear that BSE was responsible for vCJD - (a conclusion that seems more and more in doubt, particularly since the FSA now propose to allow cattle born after August 1996 into the food chain from January 2004, then scrap the OTMS scheme completely by July 2005) we wonder yet again just how necessary or useful the NSP really is.
July 10/11 ~ Dame Rennie Fritchie said Lord Whitty had breached the government's code of practice by appointing an expert to an advisory committee without his having been interviewed for the job.
The BBC report 'Cronies' charges prompt veto demand echoes a story in the Financial Times yesterday : " Dame Rennie Fritchie..... said Lord Whitty had appointed Dr Vyvyan Howard, a toxicologist from the University of Liverpool, to the committee although he had neither applied for the post nor been interviewed. "This is unprecedented in my experience," she said.
Dame Rennie said the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs advertised for toxicology and environment experts to take up unpaid advisory posts. Dr Howard applied for a toxicology post, but came in "below the line". However, when ministers decided to expand the environment posts from two to three, he was appointed without further advertisement or interview and ahead of another candidate the panel deemed suitable, Dame Rennie said.
That, she said, broke the principles of appointment on merit, subject to independent scrutiny, equal opportunities and openness.
July 2003 ~ TSE in Animal Populations - Fact and Fiction:
International Conference September 10-11, 2003, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA (and online) Sponsors: OIE, USDA, Agriculture Canada, TAFS for more details:
:http://www.usaha.org/bulletin/tsecsu.pdf and www.cvmbs.colostate.edu/aphi/TSEMain.htm "The public,.... has been provided with
information and options that are a mixture of the truth and speculation. There is little
exchange of information among all the involved parties. ..... The purpose of this conference is to establish a line of communication between scientists,
policy makers, regulators, and the public on topics related to TSEs in animal populations
in order to improve future potential preventive measures. Updates on recent research,
regulations, and other findings will be part of the conference. The scrapie in sheep (sic) will be
used as a base line disease for contrast and comparison. ....scientists, policy
makers, veterinary and public health regulators, wild life biologists, the general public,
livestock producers, the food industry, and food suppliers should be part of this dialogue
and communication...."
(BSE page on warmwell)
July 2003~ DEFRA and the FSA have told UK MEPs not to vote for tougher GM labelling today
At the European Parliament vote in Strasbourg today (Wednesday July 2) UK MEPs have been briefed to vote against tougher legislation. The new legislation would improve traceability of food and animal feed ingredients so that is known whether or not they come from GM crops, and also to deal with the problems of coexistence between GM and non-GM crops.
DEFRA and the apparently independent Food Standards Agency have sent a joint briefing to UK MEPs opposing some of the proposals which would strengthen consumer and environmental protection from GM food and crops. The briefing says that proposals to legislate on coexistence are "unwelcome". "... A 1% threshold reflects the capability of current detection methods, and the ability of the supply chain to deliver."
However, says Friends of the Earth, most supermarkets and food manufacturers already have systems in place that can detect GM material at much lower levels to a 0.1% limit of detection. The Government's own Central Science Laboratory has confirmed that this level of detection is accurate.
". See full press release from Friends of the Earth which explains the new proposals.
July 1/ 2 ~ Full decoupling, the option favoured by DEFRA and the NFU, will benefit large farm businesses but will penalise the traditional family farmer
July 1/ 2 ~ New Investigation Reveals Huge Scale EU Animal Transport Suffering
A new video investigation reveals that up to 2,000,000 animals a year experience tremendous suffering in the EU animal transport trade. Italy is at the centre of this trade being one of the biggest importers of cattle, horses, pigs and sheep from other Member States and the countries of Central and Eastern Europe.
To coincide with the start of the Italian Presidency, the video, produced by Compassion in World Farming (CIWF), is launched in Brussels today by CIWF, GAIA and the European Coalition for Farm Animals (ECFA) with support from Eurogroup for Animal Welfare. At the same time protests will be taking place at Italian embassies and consulates around Europe...."
Compassion in World Farming continues quietly and effectively to draw attention to shamefully cruel and unnecessary practices, Animals are now, thanks largely to the efforts of the CIWF, at least regarded as "sentient beings" - but the cruelty continues.
July 1 ~ "Science? The public is right to smell a rat"
Zac Goldsmith in the Independent:
"Until recently, few scientists were willing to question the safety of genetic engineering. Today, speaking out on GM can still be career suicide, as the former environment minister Michael Meacher learnt to his cost recently, but when he accused the Government of dancing to the tune of big business at the risk of public health, he was not alone....More than 450 scientists recently signed a statement calling for a complete moratorium on the release of GM crops. But the political establishment has chosen to ignore their concerns. ... A Canadian government study found super-weeds at every site it examined.
We're also told GM will feed the world's poor. That is nonsense. Last year, the head of Novartis Seeds admitted: "if anyone tells you that GM is going to feed the world, tell them that it is not". He's right. GM cotton farmers in India are reporting record losses. And in the US, the situation is such that even its agriculture department has questioned why farmers are growing GM crops, given their "mixed or even negative" financial impacts. Canada's and the US's mightiest farm organisations are demanding a moratorium on GM wheat.
At its height four years ago, the consumer backlash seemed unstoppable. Monsanto's share price plummeted by 40 per cent, supermarkets vowed to remove GM products, and even McDonald's announced that its fries would be GM-free. Yet the industry today is stronger than ever. How this has happened defies belief. (GM page)
...."
July 1 ~ The House of Commons has voted for a TOTAL BAN on Hunting. 362 members
against 154
The bill will now go to the House of Lords. Yesterday, David Lidington said, "Most people, whatever their views on hunting, will be amazed that the
Government see this issue as a priority.
This is an absurd sense of priorities - to put hunting ahead of Health ..."
The BBC in its report (external link) says, "Faced with near-certain defeat in the Commons, he (Mr Blair) ordered his hapless minister Alun Michael to execute one of the most humiliating U-turns of this parliament."
While the killing of animals as a sport is, for many, anathema, it does seem to have escaped the understanding of the most savagely vociferous that things are going to be rather worse for the fox if this legislation is finally passed. Far more likely to involve a slow and painful death are trapping, poisoning , shooting and the other clandestine ways of killing that do not make distinctions between young and old, fit and weak.
July 1 ~ Bill Wiggin appointed Shadow Minister for the Environment
It has been announced that Bill Wiggin, MP for Leominster, has been appointed Conservative
Shadow Minister for the Environment. We remember his words to Elliot Morley in December 2001 during a debate on the Animal Health Bill: "When the Minister goes to the conference he may have a chance to research the prophylactic vaccination programme in Uruguay, which has been extremely successful, especially in cattle. I hope that he will meet Dr. Paul Sutmoller, who is an expert on the subject, and compare notes with him."
Had Mr Morley actually done so he would have learnt a great deal and the UK's plans might now be far more advanced than they yet are (See list of points made June 20 - 24) ~ Just some of the questions about "next time" How far have lessons really been learned?
.
June 30 ~The current field trials, due to finish this summer, have been too limited in scope, says English Nature in its report to David King - and Lord
May agrees .
From the Independent on Sunday's article:GM threatens a superweed catastrophe "...unless the use of GM weedkillers is very strictly policed - insects and birds that live off weeds, wild flowers and grasses will be killed off because farmers will be using herbicides at the wrong time of year. This would wreck the Government's multi-million- pound programmes to save endangered birds, wildlife and insects. "It may well make some of these policies unworkable," Dr Johnson said.
The "worst case" scenario could be avoided, however, if ministers conducted even more trials, and drafted detailed and binding rules on how and where farmers grow GM crops. The current field trials, due to finish this summer, have been too limited in scope, the agency believes.
English Nature's warnings - in a detailed report to the official GM science review headed by Professor David King, Tony Blair's chief scientific adviser - have been supported by Lord May, the president of the Royal Society..."
Read in full on warmwell's GM page
June 30 ~ "Perhaps Mrs Beckett should explain to Gordon Brown that he will shortly have to find another £3 billion a year to pay for those east European farmers.."
From Booker's Notebook yesterday "The real time-bomb, which somehow escaped mention last week, follows from the fact that when the EU enlarges next year to take in Poland and other eastern European countries, even the limited farm subsidies they are allowed will leave a shortfall on the CAP budget of £3 billion a year. Conveniently, that happens to be just the sum the EU would save if, as indicated at recent meetings of its budget control committee, it abolishes the UK's £3 billion a year budget rebate.
Perhaps Mrs Beckett should explain to Gordon Brown that he will shortly have to find another £3 billion a year to pay for those east European farmers. He will not be best pleased."
June 30 ~ FSA to be challenged
Booker's Notebook in the Sunday Telegraph
"...Richard Younger-Ross, the Liberal Democrat MP for Teignbridge in south Devon, reported how the mussel and oyster industry in his constituency, until recently employing 40 people, has been all but wiped out. For several years the industry has been vainly pleading with Sir John Krebs, and ministers such as Elliot Morley, to adopt more modern testing procedures, with no more response than some sympathetic noises.
The damage inflicted on the mussel industry follows on the even more scandalous own goal I reported last week, whereby Cefas's use of a controversial testing procedure involving the injection of mice has now virtually closed down the cockle industry, putting 3,000 people out of work. Last week the Home Office banned the National Reference Laboratory in Aberdeen from using the Cefas mouse test on animal welfare grounds, after the laboratory had repeatedly come up with wholly contradictory results.
On the Thames estuary, where 200 people have been put out of work, the cockle fishermen intend openly to defy the ban, in the hope of getting the FSA's procedures tested in the courts. The evidence they will produce from an array of scientists is said to be "devastating".
June 28 ~ Throckmorton: "no grounds for compensation claims, ....
Defra's "proper and responsible" actions in managing the site..."
Ananova reports "....The report had previously concluded the site posed "negligible" public health risks, "acceptable" environmental risks and noted no direct link could be established between the site and increased stress levels among those associated with it.
Animal Health Minister Ben Bradshaw says he hopes Defra's response demonstrated the department's willingness to work with the community.
He added: "I hope that local people and others with an interest will find this written response positive, clear and helpful and that it will mark a new phase of restoration."
Mr Bradshaw will be hoping in vain. The people who have lived on the doorstep of the burial site have long memories. They feel that their views have been ignored - not just over Foot and Mouth disposal by Maff/Defra - but for the past decade. They had to suffer a huge expansion of the landfill site at Hill and Moor, then an intensive chicken farm was thrust on them against their wishes, then an HGV depot, and then in 2001 a mass burial ground for culled animals. (See throckmorton.html) As in the very similar case of Widdrington, the true facts of the Throckmorton case are unlikely to come to light without a full public inquiry. (Mr Bradshaw's performance on the Today Programme this morning does little to inspire confidence. See more on the Campbell/BBC row on the Iraq Aftermath page)
June 28 ~ Throckmorton: "no grounds for compensation claims, ....
Defra's "proper and responsible" actions in managing the site..."
Ananova reports "....The report had previously concluded the site posed "negligible" public health risks, "acceptable" environmental risks and noted no direct link could be established between the site and increased stress levels among those associated with it.
Animal Health Minister Ben Bradshaw says he hopes Defra's response demonstrated the department's willingness to work with the community.
He added: "I hope that local people and others with an interest will find this written response positive, clear and helpful and that it will mark a new phase of restoration."
Mr Bradshaw will be hoping in vain. The people who have lived on the doorstep of the burial site have long memories. They feel that their views have been ignored - not just over Foot and Mouth disposal by Maff/Defra - but for the past decade. They had to suffer a huge expansion of the landfill site at Hill and Moor, then an intensive chicken farm was thrust on them against their wishes, then an HGV depot, and then in 2001 a mass burial ground for culled animals. (See throckmorton.html) As in the very similar case of Widdrington, the true facts of the Throckmorton case are unlikely to come to light without a full public inquiry. (Mr Bradshaw's performance on the Today Programme this morning does little to inspire confidence. See more on the Campbell/BBC row on the Iraq Aftermath page)
June 27 ~ CAP reactions: Oxfam said the deal "completely sidesteps the serious problem of dairy dumping by the EU on poor countries".
Robert Uhlig's article about the CAP deal in the Telegraph today has as its headline 'Historic' CAP reform praised by Beckett who says, "she would decouple all English farmers' subsidies from next January.
Provided they kept their land in "agricultural order", which in some cases would involve little more than trimming the grass and tending hedges, English farmers would be paid a fixed, "single farm payment" no matter how little food they produced....Those that produce food will have to meet 18 "cross-compliance" requirements on environmental, animal welfare and food quality standards to receive their payment.."
How strange and alien this language seems. Oxfam uses plain English to point out an underlying and serious worry. See article.
The DEFRA website proclaims: "Secretary of State Margaret Beckett today hailed a breakthrough in EU
talks over reform of the Common Agricultural Policy as an excellent agreement. ..."
Valerie Elliot in the Times".. Many farmers are concerned that the new payments are based on
average subsidies received during the three years from 2000 to 2002.
This period coincided with the foot-and-mouth outbreak in Britain,
when payments for many farms were lower than normal, while other
farmers may have rented out land during this period for family
reasons."
Her article refers to "Sir" Ben Gill and reminds us of how useful are words such as "blank cheque" or "hand-outs" to anti-farmer spin. While the Times article says that "environmental campaigners were concerned that a patchwork farming policy in Europe would be detrimental to the environment and to wildlife habitats..." RSPB is reported by Mr Uhlig as describing the "the reforms as "a monumental change that would provide a real benefit to farm wildlife".
.... "
June 26/27 ~ CIWF Applauds CAP Reforms as Good for Farm Animal Welfare
June 26 ~ "...a botched compromise" says David Lidington
"....which falls short of the radical changes that are needed, and it is British farmers who are going to have to carry more than their fair share of the costs of reform.
"We hoped this agreement would provide a fair deal for British farmers. What we've got is an agreement that carries with it an undoubted risk of big market distortions and unfair competition, especially in the beef and sheep sectors.
"The Government had promised repeatedly that it would use its influence in Europe to secure an agreement, which served the interests of British agriculture, the environment and the developing world. The EU may find themselves in a difficult position come the time of the WTO." Mr Lidington's full message
June 26 ~ "There must be strong doubts now that the watered-down deal agreed early this morning by Agricultural Ministers in Luxembourg will deliver the international trade, market orientation and environmental benefits hoped from the reforms."
Press release from the CLA:
"The CLA has argued for many years that payments should be decoupled from production, this would simplify the system, give farmers the ability to produce for the market, and reduce accusations that our policy was distorting world trade. This agreement to introduce optional partial decoupling dilutes and delays these benefits and introduces a good deal of uncertainty about the fairness of a different policy operating around the EU...." (More)
June 26 ~ "it may still be helpful to undertake a brief literature review of the influence of trace elements, particularly selenium, on the disease status of cattle and badgers"
The EFRA report on TB - "...... We would therefore encourage the ISG to indicate why specified topics which have been drawn to its attention are not recommended for further study...
- We understand why the Government wants to implement its Animal Health and Welfare Strategy as soon as possible. However, we recommend that Defra take time to assess what might be learnt from past responses to animal disease outbreaks
- ....In the longer-term the Government should consult interested parties about the merit of introducing flexible, 'on-request' testing for tuberculosis (paragraph 19)
- . ... necessary to establish once and for all whether killing badgers has any impact on bovine tuberculosis in cattle. We therefore welcome the Minister's clear statement that the Government will not sanction culling outside the trial areas whilst the trial continues
- ....Defra is responsible for the decisions made...
- ..provide some commentary on the reasons for their different approach (paragraph 36)
- ...It is apparent that all interested parties would be willing to endorse the use of an effective bovine TB vaccine. Therefore, despite the long time-frame, research into the development of vaccines should continue. ....the private sector should be encouraged to play a part in the development of a vaccine (paragraph 42). (Efra's recommendations in full)
June 26 ~stifling research will help
nobody
From an article in the Western Mail The march of bureaucracy continues (external link) "... Three sets of findings - the lack of a CJD epidemic, the failure to
associate CJD with beef products, and the Kings College work - are now
casting doubt on the suggested BSE/CJD link.
If the link does not exist the associated bureaucracy is unnecessary and
should be run down. Defra should explain its decision and whose advice it
took.
Further findings might have raised problems, but stifling research will help
nobody, certainly not the beef industry - and least of all CJD sufferers."
June 26 ~ Important News - Scrapie in resistant sheep
On May, 23rd. 2003 the German Ministry of Agriculture (BMVEL) officially admitted that a two year old sheep, tested for TSE under the fallen stock scheme earlier, had been found positive for scrapie on the routinely used fast test for TSE.
Furthermore, tests on the genotype confirmed the initial finding that the sheep was of the ARR/ARR genotype which is thought to be resistant against infection with scrapie.
The brain sample was in a state of deterioration which made it impossible to carry out histophatological examination of the tissue. Further tests are under way at the German Federal Research Institute (BFA) Riems.
The European Commission has been informed and the SSC is asked to look into the matter. Pending the outcome of further investigations it has to be decided on a european level whether community measures dealing with scrapie have to be changed accordingly.
So far no details have been released about the breed, sex or place/region of origin of the animal in question or the date of death (It might well have died some time ago) . Additional information is not available at the moment. More details when available.
The implications of this news will not be lost on readers.
See also VETERINARY TIMES Volume 33, number 2, 27th January 2003
Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies
by Susan Haywood BVSc, PhD, MRCVS and David R. Brown M.Sc, Ph.D. Jonathan Long's article EU to destroy scrapie stock in Farmers Weekly Interactive in December
and Rare Breeds International's response to the NSP programmes
In the foreseeable future a test on blood that can sensitively and accurately predict scrapie infection will be available so that flocks can be tested and regardless of genotype be attested scrapie-free.
June 26 ~ There was no way they were willing to accept the loss of a fruit machine which gives their farmers far more than anyone else in the EU, mainly at the expense of German and UK taxpayers
Muckspreader From Private Eye ".... What really matters to the French and the Germans is that they have found a pot of gold to pay for those subsidies to the Poles and other eastern European farmers without breaking the EU bank. All they need, for the years after 2006, is another 33 billion a year, And, bingo!, they have found it. Constant references in the agenda of recent EU meetings to 'budget control' is code for the fact that, come what may, France and Germany will insist on an end to that UK budget rebate, negotiated through years of acrimonious argument by Mrs Thatcher. With backing from President Prodi, they are now determined Mr Blair must hand it over. After all, he would not like to be put in the dock as the man who blocked 'enlargement'. Gordon Brown will not be best pleased at having to cough up another 33 billion a year. But to keep Britain 'at the heart of Europe', what a small price to pay!" (Read in full)
June 20-24 ~ "Do you not understand the quite justified resentment that
there is in our rural communities at the waste of both time and money on
rebranding exercises?" asks David Lidington
"...to take just one example, your department's rural
payments agency is persistently late in delivering to British farmers the
payments to which they are entitled and on which the cash flow of their
businesses may depend?"
The shadow minister said £329,000 was spent on the rebranding with an
additional £200,000 for erecting new signs.
Mr Michael defended the need for the changes and rejected criticisms of
policies.
He said: "A lot of work has gone into making Defra an efficient organisation
that serves the public interest and is focused on the needs of its
customers....." Newcastle Journal (external link) See also warmwell entry for June 5
June 20 -24 ~"as Polish agriculture is forced, in the harshest possible way, to "modernise", millions will be driven off the land....A very great tragedy is in the making."
Christopher Booker : "
...the entrant countries will not receive full subsidies under the Common Agricultural Policy until 2013. In Poland, a quarter of the population, nearly 10 million people, are dependent on a backward and, by Western standards, inefficient agriculture. Yet as from next May the Poles will have to open their borders to fully-subsidised food surpluses from the West, so much cheaper that Polish farmers will find it impossible to compete.
The idea is that as Polish agriculture is forced, in the harshest possible way, to "modernise", millions will be driven off the land. If they go to the cities, they will find that many of Poland's subsidised industries have been closed, under EU rules banning "state aid". With 50,000 steel workers already unemployed, there will thus be little work for the dispossessed rural population, whose best hope of survival will be to head for Britain and Ireland, where they will be entitled to state support as soon as they can find somewhere to live..."
June 20 -24 ~ Food Standards Agency under fire
Two stories concern the FSA today. We read in the
Independent on Sunday that " in his first published article since being sacked by Mr Blair, Mr Meacher lists a series of reports and findings which suggest that the full impact of GM technology is still dangerously unpredictable. Many of the health tests carried out are "scientifically vacuous", he claims.
In one of the most damning passages, he says: "The only human GM trial, commissioned ironically by the Food Standards Agency, found that genetically modified DNA did in fact transfer to bacteria in the human gut. Previously many scientists had denied that this was possible.
"But instead of this finding being regarded as a serious discovery which should be checked and re-checked, the spin was that this was nothing new and did not involve any health risk."
Booker's Notebook in the Sunday Telegraph begins "Krebs kills off shellfish industry
Last week an industry worth £20 million a year, supporting several thousand people, was closed down by Sir John Krebs's Food Standards Agency on the basis of an obsolete scientific test so comprehensively discredited that even its Japanese inventor has admitted it should be abandoned....
...Last Thursday the FSA issued a blanket closure order on every cockle-bed in the country, leaving several thousand people without a livelihood. They deserve more than a self-serving bureaucratic explanation.
"
Following so closely the scandal of the use of pork and beef proteins
in chicken meat (external link to the Guardian) - only banned by the FSA after pressure from the Guardian and Panorama had shamed them to take a tougher stance - it does make one wonder what the words "Food" and "Standards" mean to the FSA. "The FSA said at the time that the issue raised no concerns about public
safety and was a matter of labelling.
Under pressure from MPs in the wake of the investigations, the FSA has
toughened its stance."
June 20 -24 ~ fallen
stock collection scheme...DEFRA says that farmers who received ten letters should have sent them all back...
"Figures could have been affected by producers who received more than one
letter but only sent a single one back, the (DEFRA) spokesman admitted.
"Producers should have sent all the letters back," he said. "We are now
trying to quantify the impact of this." This was reported deadpan by Farmers Weekly interactive
....farmers are concerned about bio-security issues and the possibility
that the annual charge for the collection scheme will rise.
Devon farmer Phil Hosking, who is chairman of the Small Farms Association,
said he did not like the proposed scheme and had not sent in his response.
"As it stands, the scheme will favour the large-scale livestock farmers at
the expense of the small ones. Charges should be per animal, not a flat rate
for the year....
...
Another small-scale Devon producer, who asked not to be named, said he had
not returned his form because the scheme would not be viable on his unit.
"Any fallen stock I have - and its only one or two a year - are taken by the
local hunt. They only charge £5 for a ewe.
"A lot of the smallholders in Devon only have a handful of ewes.
"Even if all their stock died at once it would still be cheaper to pay the
hunt than go for the collection scheme as it stands."
See Defra's letter about the fallen stock scheme ( external pdf file - eleven pages)
June 20-24 ~ History has been rewritten.
Report of the Chief Veterinary Officer -
Animal Health 2002 (external link to pdf file)
Jim Scudamore's report looks back over last year but also dwells at some length on FMD 2001. He maintains that "..the source of infection
was traced to a pig unit in Tyne & Wear..." Were others aware that the "source" of FMD 2001 had now been definitively identified? No mention at all is made in this retrospect of Professors Roy Anderson or David King, nor of the Science Group, nor the controversial nature of the contiguous cull nor the disastrous delays in slaughter times. "Over the summer, ring vaccination was looked
at again as clusters of new cases developed. But
the priority was to eradicate the disease, and
scientific and veterinary advice remained that
this goal would be achieved fastest and most
effectively through culling and through the
application of tight biosecurity measures..."( If target times had begun to be met, if the disease had been containable, if biosecurity had been followed by DEFRA and the killing teams, such "scientific and veterinary advice"might have been thought sound. But they weren't. )
The Introduction to the Report is similarly self-congratulatory:
"significant
progress has been made in implementing the recommendations of the two
independent FMD inquiries commissioned by the Government.
In particular, attention has focused on developing contingency plans and
improving the Government's emergency preparedness in case of another major
disease outbreak..."
The Government, meanwhile, has also been busy adopting EU legislation in a
number of animal health and welfare areas as well as bringing forward
important strategies, including the Animal Health Act 2002 in the aftermath
of FMD.
...."
All most satisfactory sounding - to an outsider unaware of the implications of the Animal Health Act or EU legislation. "The Government accepted virtually all the recommendations made
and endorsed the lessons drawn by these inquiries," says Mr Scudamore. The word "virtually" can cover quite an area.
June 20 - 24 ~ Just some of the questions about "next time" How far have lessons really been learned?
- Among its recommendations the Royal Society said that the Government should prepare the regulatory framework and practical arrangements (eg validation of tests, and the supply of vaccines) that would allow vaccination-to-live. Where is DEFRA's workable and implementable Vaccination Protocol? There are still so many practical issues not resolved.
- An FMD database (see below) is all very well - but where is independent (actually independent) and critical analysis of the epidemiological data? The Royal Society again : "There is considerable benefit to be gained from understanding the quantitative aspects of infectious disease dynamics.
Quantitative modelling is one of the essential tools both for developing strategies in preparation for an outbreak and for predicting and evaluating the effectiveness of control policies during an outbreak.
More work is required to refine the existing models and to strengthen their capacity to inform policy, which in turn requires full access by researchers to this database and to the data on previous outbreaks." The Imperial College models that informed policy in 2001 were as flawed as the data that went into them. Just how good is the data now? ("we would not claim by any means that the data set had been brought to a perfect state")
- The Royal Society also said: "The first suspected case in an outbreak must be diagnosed in an approved OIE reference laboratory. Thereafter, modern diagnostic methods
- including pen-side tests
- need to be developed that can shift the burden of diagnosis to veterinarians on the farm. Rapid diagnosis, particularly before clinical signs appear, would limit the size of any epidemic and improve strategic deployment of resources." How far have we progressed with these things? "Such diagnostic methods must be linked by modern telecommunications to central headquarters."
- And what has happened to improve DEFRA's Information Technology? "A prerequisite is a central database incorporating improved data on farms, the location of animals, animal movements, and the characteristics of the diseases, together with arrangements to input disease control data in a timely and assured way during an outbreak." (Royal Society)
Are the taxpayers' £85 million per year for a new system "in the summer" going to make things more efficient?
June 20/24 ~ New Zealand in the news - flatulance tax, transgenic sheep trial to stop and concerns about GM
The "flatulance tax"on New Zealand's sheep and cattle is reported by the BBC (external link). The tax on New Zealand farmers - who are not at all content that they should be the ones footing the bill for an environmental measure to benefit the whole planet - is expected to raise 8.4 million New Zealand dollars (£3 million). Since scientists realised that animal emissions produce 15% of worldwide emissions of methane there has been widespread worry about the greenhouse gases produced by livestock.
Scottish PPL Therapeutics Ltd, who cloned poor Dolly the sheep in 1997, is calling a halt for at least three years on New Zealand's first transgenic livestock field trial - in which more than 1000 transgenic sheep, tagged and chipped, are grazing Waikato pastures behind a 2m-high, electronically alarmed, perimeter fence. PPL were trying to develop a lung drug extracted from the GE milk and had worked for three years with Bayer Biological Products(external link). No one seems to know what will happen to the 1000 sheep now.
The New Zealand Herald has been running a series of articles on genetic engineering questions. We particularly appreciated the balanced views of Barbara Sumner Burstyn: Unresolved issues
in GM debate leave potential for disaster
June 19/20 ~ "we would not claim by any means that the data set had been brought to a perfect state"
says DEFRA on its Foot and Mouth Disease Information Page about the new FMD database.
The BBC's article, jokily entitled "Foot and Mouth goes virtual" says: "About six million animals had to be culled because of infection or for welfare reasons. The cost to agriculture and the food industry has been put at over £3bn; the costs to the tourist and associated industries are thought to have doubled that figure."
So it would seem that accuracy at the BBC has not been brought to a perfect state either.
DEFRA proclaims: "we have most of the salient data available in electronic form. This dataset is available to any bona-fide researcher world-wide who is prepared to observe modest confidentiality conditions."
Modest confidentiality conditions.
So the data - not by any means brought to a perfect state - may not be accessed in depth by concerned members of the public. Any "academic researcher" or bona fide journalist who does manage to examine the data in depth may not publicise what he finds. The government can tick off another of the Inquiries' recommendations towards openness, secure in the knowledge that anything damaging is highly unlikely to see the light of day.
June 19/20 ~ "The spin machine gives the public the impression that government policy is to encourage sustainable farming and organic farming. Government actions do the opposite...."
A sheep farmer from Devon writes "... The arrangements for paying for the stock slaughtered in the name of controlling FMD benefited farmer-dealers who trade and transport animals and damaged, in many cases terminally, the smaller family farms who were trying to run sustainable home bred herds and flocks. For example, a large scale farmer-dealer near us, engineered, by mixing his flocks, that all his sheep were killed. I wondered about this at the time. I have since heard that the sheep slaughtered had been bought-in for about £8.00 per ewe. He was paid something in the order of £80.00 per ewe when they were slaughtered. He could use his profit to buy more land and import some more cheap sheep.
Our own sheep are all home bred in a closed flock. If our sheep had been killed we would have received payment on a similar scale of - say £80.00 per head. Replacements of similar sheep would have cost us at least £120.00 per head - and until we had been able to replace them we would have had to live without any income. The Winslades, who lost their home bred herd must have been affected in this way.
The result of this process throughout British agriculture, has been to selectively cripple the sustainable family farms who don't use mass long distant transport of animals and to assist the agribusinesses that rely on mass long distance transport. The spin machine gives the public the impression that government policy is to encourage sustainable farming and organic farming. Government actions do the opposite...."
June 19/20~
The closure of so many of the small abattoirs in Britain has meant that animals have to travel further and further for slaughter.
British interpretation of the EU directives were used to make it impossibly uneconomic to run small local abattoirs. Deliberate policy, which happened to suit the supermarkets and large scale agribusiness interests, was used to deprive farmers of the opportunity to have their own animals killed locally for sale in farmer's markets and High Street craft butcher's shops - and the effect has been to force the long distance transport of animals.
It is all very well to attend to welfare of stock when being transported (see below) - but animals are better not transported at all. A genuine attempt to implement a truly sustainable policy for agriculture and food should look to removing the need for the mass long distance transport of animals.
June 19 ~ A recently completed EU project has called for urgent action to improve the conditions for cattle transport in Europe
(http://dbs.cordis.lu ) stating that the welfare of cattle and the quality of meat produced is being adversely affected by current transport facilities.
Funded under the quality of life and management of living resources section of the Fifth Framework Programme (FP5), the 'minimising stress-inducing factors on cattle during handling and transport to improve animal welfare and meat quality' project (CATRA) ran for three years. The UK did not take part.
Commenting on the relevancy of the project's findings EU Commissioner for Research, Philippe Busquin, said: 'Avoiding needless animal suffering is in industry's own interest: the quality of its product can be seriously affected by substandard transportation. This is why EU research not only studies cattle transportation, but also aims to support policy-making towards improved and cost-effective animal welfare, whilst safeguarding consumer protection.'
From the europa.eu website: "Transport of live animals, especially over long distances, is a controversial issue, and seen by many consumers as having a major, negative impact on animal welfare. In addition, the movement of animals over long distances to slaughter can potentially affect meat quality, whether through stress or factors such as animals fighting or damaging themselves on handling facilities. "
The European Commission is set to publish its proposals in July.
It is expected to call for a nine-hour journey limit, followed by an 11 hour break
as opposed to current rules allowing adult livestock to travel for 14 hours, followed by a one-hour break.
The new proposal also suggests that animals have continuous access to water and room to lie down.
According to FWi " David Mitchell, vice-president of National Farmers' Union Scotland believes the plan is a major threat to livestock producers.
...The proposals wouldnt even let us operate within our own country."
June 19 ~ The "First Global Conference on Animal Welfare" .
"Animal protection is a complex, multi-faceted public policy issue that includes important scientific, ethical, economic and political dimensions." says the OIE webpage describing the conference which is to take place in Paris next February (2004). " Because of its growing importance in society, animal welfare must today be addressed in a scientifically credible manner.......
The primary objective of the Conference is to improve the global understanding of the linkage between animal health and animal welfare ....
The Conference will bring together stakeholders (governmental authorities, scientists, private sector and non profit NGOs) from around the world to support OIE in its animal welfare activities and to assess the way they should contribute most effectively. It will also support the OIE in a science-based approach to the welfare of animals in agriculture and aquaculture as a start to the development of international standards."
As with the vaccination versus slaughter arguments, opposite sides in the animal welfare debate tend to be blinkered about the serious points the other is making. As Michael Meredith (pighealth.com) has wisely said," Polarised opinions and fragmented self-interests have
stifled consensual progress and understanding for too long. We must
establish on-going communication and dialogue structures that not only air
people's grievances, but visibly facilitate all sectors of the welfare
debate to influence each other as well as government policies."
June 18 ~ "We really must never let that kind of holocaust happen again because the whole thing wasn't just about animals, it was about people's lives being wrecked."
The Newcastle Journal reported the Memorial ceremony at Mossburn Sanctuary yesterday.".... The Duchess of Hamilton dedicated the commemoration stone, which has been sited in a garden at the Mossburn Animal Centre at Hightae, near Lockerbie in Dumfriesshire, during a special ceremony.
The plaque reads: "This memorial is dedicated to all the animals needlessly slaughtered in the foot-and-mouth crisis of 2001.
"We remember the persecution of the animal kingdom and the trauma inflicted upon our countryside.
"We resolve to work towards a more respectful, harmonious and sustainable relationship between the animal and human kingdoms.
"We resolve to ensure that such an outrage will never be allowed to happen again."
June 17 ~ Today's Times:"The arrogant, brutal mishandling of the foot-and-mouth crisis did immense damage to countryside business, and to our sense of Britain as a kindly and gentle nation that values living things..."
"..Public authorities were unable to cope hygienically with the Herod policy, and the Army was brought in. It was a horrible time. You may have forgotten it. Rural voters haven't. " Libby Purves in the Times today: " the
Blair regime right now looks less like a well-planned programme than a panicky
lash-up."
June 17 ~ "It's been investigated to death"
Yes indeed. In a story that has strange parallels with the WMD search, we read "Final mad cow quarantines lifted, no BSE found." CTVNewsAt11 (external links)"The Canadian Food Inspection Agency says
tests on a final 700 animals have failed to turn up any new cases of BSE.
"All the results are now in,'' said CFIA spokesman Dr. Claude Lavigne.
"Everything that we'll ever get is here. There's no more to be gained here.
It's been investigated to death.''
Lavigne acknowledged that investigators may never nail down the source of
the infection.
"The trail is cold and we're not going to find a definite source of this
infection.''
Pro-Med says: "In total, about 2700 cattle have been removed from farms and they have all
been destroyed. Rapid diagnostic testing has been completed and all results
are negative. The traditional tests are partially completed and all are
negative to date. Negative results means that the incidence of BSE in
Canada remains confined to one cow."
See also entry for May 26 where the ProMed moderator wrote: ".. there is no scientific justification for slaughtering herds that were in contact with the infected animal or its offspring. BSE cannot be passed by casual contact."
June 16/17 ~ Ash Moor Pit - illegal says EU
Wondering what became of the "Stop the Ash Moor Pit" movement, STAMP, and its claim against DEFRA, we were reassured to discover that the Department for Environment, Food and
Rural Affairs has been found in breach of EU law for - failing to
consult the public before digging three out of a planned 15 barrows in
preparation for burying up to 400,000 animal carcasses and
- failing to carry out an
environmental impact assessment into the site to find out if it was a
suitable area to have a burial pit.
The European Commission has now started formal proceedings
against the UK Government under Article 226 of the EU Treaty. (Article 226 of the EU Treaty establishes the legal procedure to be followed if a Member State does not comply with EU legislation or with a Court of Justice judgment.
In the case of non-compliance with a Court judgment the Commission may bring another action before the Court and specify the amount of the financial penalty which it considers should be imposed on the Member State.)
The other pits, similar in their disastrous impact on local people, were: Great Orton (Cumbria), Birkshaw Forest (Lockerbie), Throckmorton (Worcs), Widdrington (Northumberland), Tow Law (County Durham) and Sennybridge (Epynt) in Powys
Work (put out to tender by DEFRA) on filling in the holes at the 100-acre Ash Moor pit in Petrockstowe is expected to start later this year. It was built
amid a storm of unheeded protest from residents living close by in the village of
Meeth.
June 16 ~ Honours list:
CBE
Anthony Alan Gibson, regional director, National Farmers' Union, services
to agriculture and rural economy in the South West.
We are very pleased to see this accolade go to such a man as Mr Gibson whose forthright comments have always seemed to have been based on a genuine love of farming and on common sense.
June 12 - 16 ~ FMD Vaccination Trigger.
Chris Stockdale, stakeholder at DEFRA meetngs, writes,
" Robert Uhlig's article in the Daily Telegraph of yesterday (13/6/03) contains the news that the EU "could impose emergency vaccination if a member state's infected livestock were not culled within 24 hours and dangerous contacts within 48 hours".
.....Without wishing to be overpessimistic, who will control the report to slaughter data? DEFRA, SERAD etc. Perhaps we should suggest now that all such should be automatically copied into the European central FMD Reference Library - otherwise how would they know? ....."
Read Chris Stockdale's message in full
June 12 - 16 ~ "exceptional psycho-social impact of the disease"
Link to European commission Press Release re FMD June 12 2003
FMD: Byrne welcomes political agreement on improved Directive to control outbreaks (external link) "... The Council of Agriculture Ministers achieved today political agreement on revised and improved legislation on EU measures to control outbreaks of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD). FMD is not dangerous for human health but outbreaks of this highly contagious viral disease in livestock have an exceptional economic and psycho-social impact on the rural and national economy in the EU, The amended Directive details the measures to rapidly control and eradicate the disease ..."
And the reaction from the NFU (emphasising those face-saving "developments since the 2001 outbreak" )
June 12 -16 ~ Michael Meacher to go as part of the prime
minister's reshuffle.
We are very concerned - but far from surprised - to see his departure as Environment Minister
. He spoke the truth and was accused by a leading member of the powerful pro-GM lobby of boycotting the field trials for the controversial plants....The GM lobby regard him as an obstacle to the development of such crops in Britain. Tony Juniper (Friends of the Earth Press Release) said:
"With the Government's GM public debate barely 10 days old, the
one minister urging caution on this issue has been sacked. This
move increases fears that the Government won't listen to public
opinion and is preparing to allow GM crops to be commercially
grown in the UK."
June 12 - 16 ~ "Mrs Beckett was left looking isolated and out of touch at yesterday's negotiations.."
Robert Uhlig in the Telegraph Beckett farms out powers to EU
"Britain lost the power yesterday to decide its own policy on handling any
future foot and mouth epidemic when agriculture ministers voted to give the
European Commission the final say on whether any country should vaccinate or
not.
Because of concerns about British shortcomings in dealing with the £8
billion epidemic that brought the countryside to a halt in 2001, the
directive agreed yesterday gives the commission "a key role in managing an
outbreak in partnership with the member states"....... "Mrs Beckett was left looking isolated and out of touch at yesterday's negotiations after it emerged that Germany and France had stuck an agreement that derailed British hopes of radically reforming the bloated Common Agricultural Policy..."
June 12 - 16 ~ It is agreed: emergency vaccination to move to the top of the list of control measures against Foot and Mouth in the EU
"Emergency vaccination is moved to the
forefront of control measures instead of being the
last resort. The agreement is a true reform." David Byrne.
European Agriculture Ministers have today (Thursday) agreed new laws for controlling foot-and-mouth disease - including requiring Member States to make arrangements for the use of emergency vaccination as soon as the disease is confirmed.
It also gives the commission a key role in managing another FMD crisis, including the power to initiate a vaccination programme.
"This approach is bolstered by modified international trade rules and lab tests to distinguish vaccinated from infected herds," said a commission statement. Emergency vaccination will still be backed up with a stamping out policy for infected and "suspect" animals.
Para 5.1.1 "The present proposal provides more details on the measures to be taken in the event of an outbreak. With the aim to reduce the number of animals to be killed within the framework of the disease control measures, it particularly emphasises the role of emergency vaccination." The Directive would provide for regionalization within an affected Member State and allow movement of vaccinated animals from negative herds - following re-establishment of "FMD free status" -- within the Member State concerned but not between States. Restrictions on trade of milk and meat products are kept to the minimum required to prevent transmission and spread of the disease. It also provides for the maintenance of a vaccine bank and diagnostic facilities.
The Food Standards Agency has today made some welcome announcements: "The Food Standards Agency announced in April 2001 that it was satisfied that eating meat, milk or other produce from animals that have been treated with authorised foot and mouth disease vaccines would not have any implications for food safety.
Nor did the FSA consider that there would be any need to label meat products derived from animals that have been vaccinated with the food and mouth (sic) disease vaccine.
All vaccines for food animals have to be given a licence before they can be used.
As part of the licensing process, the Government's independent expert committee, the Veterinary Products Committee, thoroughly assesses the safety of the vaccine to ensure that its use will not pose any threat to human health."
June 12 _ 16 ~ DEFRA's response to the new law
Ignoring such comments in the EU FMD report as: "The handling of the epidemic was characterised by a lack of co-ordination between veterinary and policy staff within the State Veterinary Service and between the Regions and the centre. This led to a number of difficulties in defining and implementing the Government's control strategy. A clear delineation of powers was lacking..." and "contingency plans and the logistical and staffing preparations for an outbreak of FMD or other notifiable exotic animal diseases in the United Kingdom were suffering from considerable shortcomings... Hardly anything had been done to implement (the Drummond Report) this report's recommendations for remedying the shortcomings before the crisis arose, even though in July 2000 the head of the state veterinary service expressed extreme concern about the state of preparations, particularly with regard to slaughter, disposal of animal carcases, staff training and the availability of up-to-date contingency plan...."
Defra reacts with what some might consider breathtaking assurance, claiming success all round: "Welcoming the Directive, Animal Health Minister Elliot Morley said:
"The Directive is consistent with the Government's view that emergency vaccination should be considered as part of the control strategy from the start of any outbreak of FMD.
The Greek Presidency has made rapid progress in negotiations on this Directive and are to be congratulated on the final outcome.
The UK has played a pivotal role in the shaping of the Directive, calling on experience gained in eradicating the disease during the 2001 outbreak. Since the start of this year, Defra has been in discussions with a wide range of stakeholders about the implications of the EU proposals and how they will be applied in the UK" -
However, if general face-saving is the price to pay for emergency vaccination to be accepted in future outbreaks, so be it.
June 12 -16 ~If Professor Alan Ebringer's theory that BSE and MS are autoimmune diseases which are linked to the microbe Acinetobacter were to be confirmed, the implications are of huge importance - but his department is forced to close.
As has been mentioned on warmwell's BSE/CJD pages, the respected scientist Professor Alan Ebringer, Professor of Immunology, School of Health and Life Sciences, Kings College, University of London, has had all funding withdrawn, so that the next stage of his research (to investigate whether vCJD patients also exhibit antibodies to Acinetobacter) cannot now be undertaken. His entire department at Kings College is to close down and all the expertise that has been built up will be lost.
His findings were not consistent with the official infectious prion theory. However, if Professor Ebringer's theory can be confirmed that BSE and MS are autoimmune diseases which are linked to the microbe Acinetobacter, the implications are of huge importance and are far reaching. The following conclusions arise:
- There will be no vCJD epidemic and the panic measures currently costing Canada so much will be shown to have been groundless.
- A cure for vCJD, based on treatment for Acinetobacter, could be set in motion.
- BSE cannot be passed on by eating infected meat. The meat from BSE cows is safe to eat and has always been safe to eat.
- The massive cattle cull in the UK was unnecessary.
- The devastating blow dealt to the UK livestock industry, and elsewhere, was unnecessary.
- The financial outlay for the BSE disaster of £5 billion of taxpayers money could have been spent on other socially more relevant needs.
- The massive European and wider research programmes on TSEs in sheep, with potentially disastrous implications for the sheep industry in the UK, are flawed and therefore worthless.
- A possible cure for MS may be found.
- The extremely costly tonsil screening programme plus associated costs was unnecessary.
- Reputations will be damaged.
- It may pave the way to improving the reputation/perception of science/scientists in the eyes of the public, by allowing scientific research to be open to rigorous peer group scrutiny, by showing that alternative views are encouraged rather than suppressed, and most importantly that funding is not linked to producing politically acceptable results.
More about Professor Ebringer's work can be seen on the vCJD/BSE page
June 12/13 ~"Depopulation"
The slaughter of cattle in Canada has revealed nothing: http://www.zwire.com/site/News.cfm?BRD=1996&dept_id=459492&newsid=8283993&PAG=461&rfi=9 "....1,500 samples. All cattle from these 18 farms have been killed and more than
1,500 samples have been submitted for laboratory tests. Rapid diagnostic
tests from these 18 farms have all been negative.
Canada has also depopulated approximately 1,000 additional animals from
nonquarantined farms linked to the investigation. All samples submitted for
testing came back negative."
Jun 12 ~ Nanotechnology will revolutionise our lives - it should be regulated
"We must not be blinded by science " Dr Caroline Lucas, (much respected on this website for, among other things, her work as Vice President of the EU Committee investigating the Foot and Mouth crisis), has written in today's Guardian:...The government's announcement yesterday that it is commissioning the Royal Society to undertake an investigation into the benefits and problems of nanotechnology suggests that it might - perhaps - be about to learn from some of the mistakes it made over biotechnology and GM foods. .....Unfortunately, proponents of the new technology have learned from GM. Already they are presenting nanotech as a "scientific" issue rather than a societal one.
Policymakers must not fall for this doublespeak, and must ask the right questions about nanotech's social and environmental impacts: its effects on employment (if we can replace copper with carbon nanotubes, for example, what will be the future of those in Zambia who depend on the copper industry?), on human health and on biodiversity. The most immediate priority must be to prevent those with most to gain from the new technology from winning a regulatory race before government even arrives at the starting line." (article)
Jun 12 ~ "Leading Indian food analyst Devinder Sharma dismissed the GM potato...
... as "another magic bullet from the trashcan of biotechnology industry". He argued that protein could be better provided by the pulses used traditionally in India. "What this country needs is pulses. They contain 20%-26% proteins... this potato has 2.5% protein. Please tell me which one is better."... "
Read (external link) article from today's Guardian: Scientists develop GM 'protato' to feed India's poorest children
Jun 12 ~"Mrs. Beckett and Lord Whitty, the farms minister,
are reduced to behaving these days like bullying traffic wardens; they have
no more power to decide what goes on in British farming than a jobsworth
from the local social services office."
We read in this week's Muckspreader (Private Eye) "One of Britain's most active GM campaigners recently received by mistake an
invitation to a GM "consultation" meeting in Brussels. Delighted to have
the chance to put her case directly to the EU's agriculture commissioner,
Frans Fischler, she was intrigued to see the great man take the platform,
flanked by representatives of companies concerned with pushing GM crops.
Fischler announced that growing GM crops would soon be legal throughout the
EU. There was no opportunity for questioning or debate. "It was a
'consultation,'" as she put it, "only in the sense that Stalin was
'consulting' with the Soviet people when he announced one of his five-year
plans".....
....As minister Michael Meacher recently admitted, the "competence" to decide GM
policy was handed to Brussels more than 10 years ago and there is no longer
anything he and his colleagues can do about it. But the same is true of all
other aspects of farm policy. It seems strangely difficult for people to
take on board that Britain's right to decide agricultural policy has been
handed over lock, stock and barrel to Brussels; from deciding which crops
should be grown in our fields to making it a criminal offence to bury a
stillborn lamb or put a basket of free range eggs on the counter of a
village shop.
..... (Read in full)
June 12 ~ Early Day Motion 1258 - Fluoridation of Public Water Supplies:"... the addition
of medicines to public water supplies is a breach of fundamental
human rights" Did your MP sign?
(See also warmwell entry for May 12 2003 and consider also
Fax your MP)
That this House considers that the only chemicals which should be
added to public water are those which are essential for its
purification for public consumption; believes that the addition
of medicines to public water supplies is a breach of fundamental
human rights; and rejects any proposals to amend legislation to
permit the addition of fluoride to public water supplies.
Mr John Butterfill,
Mr John Bercow, Mr Julian Brazier, Mr Colin Breed, Mr John Burnett, Mr Gregory Campbell, Mr Ronnie Campbell , Mr Christopher Chope, Jeremy Corbyn, Mr Jonathan Djanogly , Mr Brian H Donohoe, Mr David Drew , Mr Alan Duncan, Mr Bill Etherington, Mr Nigel Evans, Mr Edward Garnier,
Mr John Gummer, Mr Mike Hancock , Mr John Hayes , Mr Gerald Howarth, Mr Alan Hurst, Mr Michael Jack, Mr Boris Johnson, Mrs Jacqui Lait , Mr Edward Leigh , Dr Julian Lewis, Mr Terry Lewis, David Maclean, Alice Mahon, Mr Andrew Mitchell, Mr Malcolm Moss, Mr Andrew Robathan, Mr Laurence Robertson, Mrs Iris Robinson, Mrs Marion Roe, Andrew Rosindell, Mr Richard Shepherd, Mr Keith Simpson, Mrs Caroline Spelman, Sir Michael Spicer, Mr Desmond Swayne, Mr Hugo Swire, Mr Robert Syms, Mr Simon Thomas, Dr Rudi Vis, Joan Walley, Mr Nigel Waterson, Angela Watkinson, Mr John Whittingdale, Mr Bill Wiggin, Mr Alan Williams (Swansea West), Ann Winterton, Sir Nicholas Winterton, Mr James Wray
If your MP is not there - please read this from the National Pure Water Association (external link) and the warmwell entry for May 12 : "...Ministers talk of enhancing consumer choice but are proposing a policy that offers no choice. Evian and Malvern must be rubbing their hands. If the government goes ahead with the plan, the main beneficiaries will be the bottled water companies."
asks an emailer today. "Viscount Falkland said: " would we be debating this at all if we were not in the EU?"
How blindingly simple; that should be the litmus test for all legislation. It should be the first question to be answered on any Impact Assessment. Why did I not think of it before; imagine the joy of scrapping whole swathes of Euro-directives with which we are increasingly burdened, brought in ONLY because we are in the EU quicksand."
June 11 ~ Team to look at suffering caused by foot-and-mouth outbreak
The Western Mail
"CHILDREN'S poems, farmers' views and media interpretations will be
examined as part of a new two-year study into the foot-and-mouth outbreak of
2001.
Researchers at the University of Nottingham have won £135,000 to fund
the project, which will look at the cultural and social implications of the
disease.
The study, Caught Between Science and Society: Foot and Mouth Disease,
is among the first of its kind looking at how the disease affected farmers,
families and communities.
...It is hoped that, in the event of another outbreak, the investigation's
results will give policymakers a better grounding on which to make their
decisions."
The emailer who sent us this link comments:"Maybe. I'd be more impressed if the culprits were in front of
a Court."
June 11 ~ "Has DEFRA gone stark, staring, raving mad in saying that we have to have the regulations?" The Earl of Onslow on Horse Passports
The House
of Lords has been debating the question of Horse Passports. The Lords who stand up for reason and humanity are, as usual, eloquent, erudite, outspoken and funny - although the issue itself, alas, is far from being amusing.. The Earl of Onslow: ......We have existed for a thousand years without horse passports. Just because the French muck up the invasion of Russia and take a liking to eating horseflesh, we suddenly have to have horse passports, let alone the fact that we cannot bury livestock, and that every sheep has to have an ear tag. DEFRA is the department for making absolutely certain that it is weighed down with regulation, red tape and incompetence. I thought that the old Ministry of Agriculture was bad, but DEFRA!.....
...Lord Willoughby de Broke: I have some sympathy with DEFRA, and with the Minister, to the extent that his department is now relegated to the status of a branch office of the Directorate-General of Agriculture in Brussels. It seems that he has no option but to implement the directive with which we are dealing.
To what extent did the Government resist this typically heavy-handed and costly EU directive? What was the position taken by DEFRA officials and our permanent representatives in Brussels when the measure was in its early stages? Did they fight it in the committee rooms? Did they fight it in the bars and on the beaches? Did they fight it in the fleshpots of Brussels, or was our "strong voice in Europe" reduced to the usual impotent squeak of protest before the ritual cave-in? Did our representatives support the directive and, if so, why? After all, they are charged with looking after our interests and not those of our horse-eating partners in the European Union.
When the measure was considered by the EU standing committee on zootechnics in 1999, it was passed by 64 votes to 23. Which way did our representatives vote then? It is important to know. The Minister will not be able to give me an answer this evening, but I would be grateful if he wrote to me with that detail.
Read the debate ( Lord Willoughby de Broke is still waiting for a written answer from Lord Whitty.)
June 11 ~ I cannot see what is anti-European in an aversion to a supranational regime that fails to regulate its rotten apples and lacks any wider accountability.
June 11 ~"It is also unclear that Britain's current methods of slaughter would provide significantly improved animal welfare alternatives."
Telegraph opinion (external link) on the ritual slaughter recommendations "
...The Shechita (Jewish) and Zabiha Halal (Muslim) practices of slaughter are not barbaric rituals, but religious ones. Quite apart from the sacred nature of these practices, the concerns for animal welfare in both religions existed long before animal welfare became such a prominent public issue.
It is false to suggest that this is a debate that simply sets religious practice against high standards of welfare. Both religions protect the animals until the last moment of slaughter and the killing is rigorously supervised.
.......Not only did the bolt-gun technique employed during the foot and mouth crisis highlight the imperfections of current methods, but research carried out at Bristol University in 1993 also suggested that the electrode-stun method can require up to 15.6 per cent of animals to be re-stunned, as more than a third are stunned in the wrong head position......
It is the FAWC's responsibility to establish beyond doubt why the curtailing of these ancient practices will so dramatically improve the quality of animals' lives that we are left with no choice but to enrage these two religions through a ban on halal and kosher practices. So far, they are nowhere near doing so."
See also the FAWC report (external link)
June 10/11 ~ DEFRA should be the first ones taken to the European court. After all, in 2001 they buried 100,000's of carcases all over the country.
FAILURE OF NATIONAL COLLECTION SCHEME FOR DEADSTOCK
a press release from Farmers for Action.
" Surely now DEFRA must realise this failure was not due to anything other than farmers using their democratic rights. The fact they chose not to send in their forms is a show of strength of feeling that they are not going to accept the proposed scheme. If fallen stock is a public health issue, then DEFRA should show us the evidence and if there is a strong case that the public is at risk, then DEFRA should be the first ones taken to the European court. After all, in 2001 they buried 100,000's of carcases all over the country. If indeed there is a need for such a scheme, FFA believe DEFRA should pick up the bill, after all public health is the government's duty not the farmer's. Most other EU governments pay, why not the UK?..."
(More)
June 10 ~ Manmade chemicals contaminating people? Samples will be sent for independent scientific analysis
Western Morning News(external link) " The World Wildlife Fund is visiting the Westcountry to test the extent
to which manmade chemicals are contaminating people. A team of medical
experts hired by WWF, which is campaigning for reductions in
environmental pollution, will visit Exeter on Monday, June 23 to take
blood samples for analysis from volunteers.
The samples will be sent for independent scientific analysis to
determine whether hazardous chemicals used in everyday products are
building up in human beings in the long term.
The charity hopes to test 10 people in 12 venues across the UK, with the
results to be published later in the year and used to lobby the EU for
tighter regulations on the use of chemicals in manufacturing."
June 10 ~ let us join this debate, and see how much the government likes it when "all voices are heard"
George Monbiot in today's Guardian. He says that the issue of human health has been over-emphasised by the media. The principal issue - "perpetually and deliberately ignored by government, many scientists, most of the media and, needless to say, the questionnaire being used to test public opinion, is the corporate takeover of the food chain", the second is environmental damage. He points out that "the weeds which, as a result of GM pollen contamination, have acquired multiple herbicide resistance" are now resistant to all three of the most widely used modern pesticides. "The result is that farmers trying to grow other crops must now spray it with 2,4-D, a poison which persists in the environment."
"...Like Monsanto, the British government has already invested in genetic engineering. In 1999, it allocated £13m (or 26 times what it is spending on the great debate) "to improve the profile of the biotech industry", by promoting "the financial and environmental benefits of biotechnology". ......
Last year, an unnamed minister told the Financial Times that the debate was simply a "PR offensive". "They're calling it a consultation," he said, "but don't be in any doubt, the decision is already taken."......
The only chance we have of keeping (GM crops) out of Europe is to ensure that....our governments fight the US through the WTO and, if they lose, pay compensation rather than permit them to be planted. So let us join this debate, and see how much the government likes it when "all voices are heard". Like Monsanto, it may come to wish it had never asked.
Read George Monbiot's article in full Join the debate at http://www.gmnation.org.uk/
June 10 ~ "If we leave animals alone in their natural habitat, viruses in the animal kingdom will remain there"...
Alert Issued as U.S. Monekypox Cases Grow to 33Public health officials in three states tried on Monday to track down pet prairie dogs believed spreading a smallpox-like illness, not seen before in the Western Hemisphere, that may have infected 33 people.
Only six of the victims were being treated in hospitals, officials said, and they were expected to recover with bed rest. The disease, caused by monkeypox virus, is not believed to spread person-to-person.
But in light of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome scare and an approaching summer season when mosquito-born West Nile virus was likely to again pose a deadly threat, health officials were moving rapidly to attack the newly diagnosed problem..." (Reuters external link)
From ProMed site (external link) "Investigators
have traced the origin of the outbreak to a pet distributor in
Villa Park, Ill. That distributor had a giant Gambian rat, indigenous
to African countries, that may have infected batches of prairie dogs,
Hughes said"......."The ending of vaccination programmes against smallpox in the late
1970s has probably led to an increase in susceptibility to monkeypox"
"If we leave animals alone in their natural habitat, viruses in the animal kingdom will remain there, but because we disrupt their environment, we are exposed to the viruses" [Universiti Malaya medical microbiology professor Datuk Dr Lam Sai Kit, SARS virus 'jumped species through handling'
].
June 9/10 ~ "People travelled miles to attend this meeting and
it was really difficult to find the venue"
Western Morning News Campaigners vow to destroy all GM crops
"..this weekend, farmers, campaigners, councillors and consumers
travelled to Taunton's Holiday Inn to make their voices heard at what
has been the "best-attended" meeting since the Government launched the
nationwide consultation on GM seven days ago.
For the first time since the consultation kicked off in Birmingham last
Tuesday, organisers - the GM Debate Steering Board - had to set up an
extra meeting to accommodate the public.
....
"The publicity was absolutely appalling. There were only two A4 sheets
on the main and back doors which indicated there was a meeting. Nothing
else apart from that. People travelled miles to attend this meeting and
it was really difficult to find the venue"....Keith Hatch, a regional member of Friends of the Earth, said: "I think
it's pretty obvious that hardly anyone wants GM crops. At the end of the
conference we were asked if we wanted to see GM plants grown in the UK.
Nobody put their hands up.".....
"
June 9 ~ "Replacing one gene with another is not as simple as the biotechnology companies suggest, and the long-term consequences for the environment and consumers are not clear."
Genetically modified food. Letter to the Times yesterday from Dr Kristin Becker
Consultant in Clinical Genetics, North-West Thames Regional Genetics Centre
THE UK government surely does not represent the public in trying to stop labelling of genetically modified food under pressure from Washington. The public have a right to know what they are eating. The human genome has been sequenced, but we are only just beginning to appreciate the complexity of gene-gene interactions. One gene can have many functions and cause a variety of human diseases. Replacing one gene with another is not as simple as the biotechnology companies suggest, and the long-term consequences for the environment and consumers are not clear.
It appears the government hopes the public will happily eat GM food in years to come, for the sake of biotechnology companies making a huge profit. If labelling is abolished here, I will have to leave the country, having worked in the NHS for many years. "
See also updated GM page The knives are out, apparently, for Michael Meacher
June 9 ~ Britain ran a covert 'dirty tricks' operation designed specifically to produce misleading intelligence that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction to give the UK a justifiable excuse to wage war on Iraq.
The Iraq and after page gives details of Operation Rockingham, which was set up to 'cherry-pick' intelligence about the Iraqi WMD programme and suppress any intelligence indicating that Saddam's stockpiles had been destroyed or wound down.
Read how John Reid was instructed by Downing Street to make his attack last week on "rogue elements" within the security services. And share our concern that the US expects space to be "weaponised" in the medium-term future, and is determined to take an "unassailable technological lead."
June 9 ~ At the moment we dairy farmers are "lucky".
David writes about fallen stock: "... If the animal is over 30
months, you get the vet out to declare on the official form (4 copies) that
the animal is fit for human consumption. He then kills it on the farm by
lethal injection or the tried and tested gun. You then ring the British
Cattle Movement Service (BCMS) for a Casualty Reference number, fill out an
OTM17 form (4 copies), find the passport, sign all the appropriate bits,
stick on the bar code stickers, send a tear off bit back to BCMS, contact
the local knacker transport service (more paperwork) and he will remove dead
beast to an incinerator approved by DEFRA. If you have not made a mistake
on any of the paperwork and the animal has all the necessary tags/ID, you
will eventually receive a cheque from the RPA (Rural Payments Agency) for an
animal that was deemed fit for human consumption, but due to BSE
restrictions had to be incinerated.
Now when the BSE restrictions come off next January (on certain age groups) or
the animal is under 30 months, I think you go through all the above
procedures except the incinerator. Problem is you need a slaughter house to
take it and I don't know of one in the UK - so I have buried those - but
now the EU says I cannot bury (or burn) them anymore ...." David's full message illustrates very well the "luck" of the dairy farmer today, hemmed in with the current legislation.
June 7 ~ Hundreds of people across the Westcountry have been denied access to
the national debate on the commercialisation of GM crops in Taunton
today.
Western Morning News report (external link): " Since the beginning of the week when the consultation kicked off
in Birmingham, organisers - the Department for Environment, Food and
Rural Affairs - have been inundated with calls from the region's
residents asking to book a place......
"However, the hall cannot accommodate more than 100 people at one time
and there are health and safety regulations which prevent us from
allowing more in."
John Watson, co-owner of the Riverford Organic Farm in Totnes and a
staunch anti-GM campaigner, was refused entry to the meeting.
......
"I would have liked to approach the scientists and ask them a really
important fact about the commercialisation of GM crops in this country.
"If someone decides to spend millions of pounds on developing a super
crop like the genetically engineered Chardon maize and then they refuse
to produce any information about it, then surely something must be
wrong. It's a shame I won't be able to raise this point."
......"
June 7 ~ The FSA doth protest
David Lidington: Government spins more yarns
"This is just another example of this Labour Government 'spinning' reports for their own political gain" says the Shadow DEFRA secretary - but he sheds no light on what the disagreements may be about. Nor does Valerie Elliott in today's Times. "...the leaking of an agency document which
states that because of disagreements on policy between the agency
and other government departments, sensitive briefing documents
should not be available on the Cabinet Office's Knowledge Network.
This is a computerised information system that keeps the whole of
Whitehall "on message". Agency officials also fear that any material
given to the Cabinet Office might be subjected to "political spin". ...
What could the Food Standards Agency be reporting that it fears "the Government" might subject to spin? A cynic might even suggest that this is just another piece of spun yarn with which to try to make convincing the much vaunted independence of the FSA from the government.
June 6 ~ "Maff span its way, appallingly, throughout foot and mouth, earning the
enduring distrust and despite of a rural community..."
".. desperate for substance,
not bluster. If Defra wants to win back trust, it should stop spinning,
content itself with cheap writing paper and get down to work." The final paragraph of a Western Morning News article yesterday
"....farmers - truly modern, state-of-the-art farmers - are engaged in PR a great deal of the time, standing outside in all weathers at farmers' markets, smiling and being robust and jolly and trustworthy. Many are also acquiring other skills. They welcome the public to their homes. They are nannies, teachers, ambassadors, butchers, curers and even chefs. They are selling not just themselves and their products, but farming itself.
And that is all that they ask of the Ministry: that they tell the world about the glory of British food - that our natural ingredients are among the finest and our cooks and food producers among the most skilful and caring in the world.
They ask for a level playing field, not the mountain range created by the iniquitously unjust and counter-productive Common Agricultural Policy. They ask that bureaucracy should be minimised so that they can actually get on with what they do best, which is farming, not form-filling. They need, in short, a fair crack of the whip from a Ministry appointed to serve them, not to command and obstruct them..."
June 6 ~ Percy Schmeiser, who found his fields heavily contaminated by Monsanto's GM canola
volunteers was ordered to pay fines and costs when taken to court by the company accusing him of stealing their patented seeds. Schmeiser broke down in tears in court; he has built up his own high-yielding canola variety by saving seeds for years, which has now been totally ruined by transgenic contamination.
A letter today in the Guardian (external link) from Elliot Long"....Since Monsanto owns the patent, they own his canola, and there's nothing he can do about it. This is the scenario that opponents of GM foods are afraid of - and if not, they should be. Whatever the reasons the EU has used until now to block GM food production, it should be wary about giving up this status. I agree that consumers should be able to decide for themselves whether they want to buy GM food, but I wonder how long this choice will exist when the propagation of patented crops is governed only by the wind. "
Baroness Dr. Susan Greenfield is one of the major architects of a set of 'guidelines' for science journalists and scientists, discouraging them from reporting unpublished findings and from questioning the safety of GM. The Royal Society, the House of Lords and a transmogrified PR company known as the Social Issues Research Centre (SIRC) funded by the food industry were the major bodies promoting the guidelines. Sir John Krebs, head of the Food Standards Agency, was also involved. According to this article from I-SIS, the guidelines formed part of a concerted campaign to suppress scientific dissent after Dr. Arpad Pusztai alerted the world to possible harmful effects of GM foods.
(Warmwell's GM page)
June 6 ~" I'm all for taking children back to their roots instead of letting them play on their play stations..."
..was the remark of a Cirencester teacher during the visit of the Prince of Wales, Patron of the Soil Association, to Abbey Home Farm, Cirencester on Wednesday. The Prince opened the new education "Green Room" centre at the farm. Abbey Home Farm has 150 Friesian dairy cows together with a herd of 50 cross-bred beef cattle. Sheep are alternated with the cattle and the farm has a flock of over 500 breeding ewes, including pedigree Lleyns. Nearer the farmstead, there are free-range organic pigs and laying hens. Abbey Home Farm is part of Elm Farm Research Centre's demonstration farm network. As part of this important work, the farm provides visits for other farmers and professionals. This helps disseminate information on organic production and the latest research findings.
His Royal Highness described the farm and its educational centre as a "brave and courageous venture."
"It is important in an age when so many people live in urban area, to explain how things are grown. I hope this particular room will be of enormous value in getting the message across," he said. (http://www.princeofwales.gov.uk/news/news.php)
June 6 ~ Haskins on DEFRA - as much as possible must be handled at local level taking account of local concerns
Telegraph "....His proposals have already ruffled feathers in Whitehall. Under his plans, many Defra civil servants would lose their jobs as their roles were devolved to regional bodies.
Lord Haskins's proposals for the Environment Agency are also controversial. He sees its role primarily as a regulator, responsible for delivering new European Union directives on water, soil and waste."
June 6 ~Lord Haskins' review of DEFRA " would break up the Government's centralised structure...
which was so heavily criticised during the 2001 foot and mouth crisis - and involved the delivery of rural policy to the regional development agencies. The review would also lead to a major thinning out of the plethora of Government quangos and agencies. In an interview with the WMN yesterday, he admitted that change would not be easy, but said he believed the political will was there."Vested interest will shout and holler, but we will have to overcome that," he said. See three articles about Lord Haskins' review in today's Western Morning News
June 6 ~ Mrs Beckett yesterday " I constantly read that I have already made a decision about the commercial growing of the individual crops now being evaluated in these trials. That is totally untrue."
"I have not and I will not until the evidence of those trial results is available." She urged people to take part and vote in the debate on the internet at www.gmnation.org.uk, a website which, according to the Telegraph, has received 2,300 completed questionnaires since the debate began on Tuesday.
June 6 ~ David Lidington "I am in favour of a debate, but this one looks rigged"
Commenting on the continuing GM national debate and Margaret Beckett's speech on GM crops, David Lidington MP, Shadow Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs said,
"I am in favour of a debate, but this one looks rigged. The public meetings were poorly advertised and worst of all the Ministers may announce a decision before the end of their own crop trials"
Commenting on the Lord Haskins preliminary report into reviewing rural delivery arrangements, David Lidington said,
"It is no surprise to any farmers that DEFRA is riddled with bureaucracy. I would cheer a genuine move to simplify the multitude of agencies and rules. But Labour's record so far gives little reason for optimism.
June 6 ~ A platform for change: European Livestock Alliance: www.ela-europe.org
"The European Livestock Alliance is a pan European, non commercial society, uniting breeders, keepers, vets, scientists, and specialist elements within Europe's rural infrastructure to preserve the well being, health and safety of humans and animals in the broadest sense of the word.....
Livestock breeders are responsible for ensuring that the health and well-being of livestock is guaranteed, which can only be achieved by obtaining the best unbiased scientific advice available and taking account of future developments. We are very concerned about the implications of an eradication policy that is only export-market orientated without taking into account the surrounding social, environmental and animal welfare issues. We feel that the situation in Europe has reached a point where the above mentioned factors must receive attention from those directly affected and involved.
TO BE HEARD IN EUROPE WE NEED ONE STRONG VOICE
.... " Visit the website
June 5 ~ The remaining private addresses of owners will soon be visited by the culling teams...
A sentence from
the Pro-Med siteto chill the memory of those in Devon, Cumbria, Yorkshire, Wales, Dumfries and Galloway and elsewhere.. Is a blanket mass-slaughter of susceptible animals now the inevitable response to disease? Why must vaccination be denied to animals whose owners value them above profits?
"Next week, the remaining susceptible pet-avians should be culled in the areas previously affected by HPAI. The Gelders valley is already "empty," and in North-Brabant and Limburg the gassing of the birds is almost accomplished. The remaining private addresses of owners will soon be visited by the culling teams. According to the Dutch Association of Pet Avians Owners [Vereniging van Hobbydierhouders], quite a number of pet chickens and ducks have been hidden by their owners....
...The HPAI outbreak has cost the life of almost 30 million chickens on 255 poultry holdings (including 22 pet-avians premises). The poultry owners association is of the opinion that some of these farms will never return to business. "
Ghandi's words - that a society may be judged by the way it treats its animals - have never seemed more relevant.
June 5 ~ Rebranding DEFRA will cost us half a million...
"The cost of developing a new "corporate identity" for the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs was put at £329,000. Rural Affairs Minister Alun Michael said replacing or introducing new internal signs at Defra premises was forecast to cost a further £200,000..." Guardian's Yesterday in Parliament (external link)
The news was yesterday met with fury in the Westcountry rural community.
(Western Morning News - What a Waste)
Alan Michael said: "The re-branding exercise
is necessary to establish a new identity, which will assist in
explaining the role and purpose of the new department among staff,
stakeholders, other partners and the public...."
and told Liberal Democrat Norman Baker (Lewes) that extensive research
had helped the department develop a better understanding of "what our
customers expect from us".
Anthony Gibson, South West NFU regional director, said: "Substance
matters rather than style. It's the substance of what Defra does, rather
than the way it presents itself, that farmers care about."
( See also warmwell entry for May 28 ~ DEFRA offers £110,000 a year for "an enthusiastic
and effective ambassador for rural communities" to "make a discernible
difference to rural economic productivity".)
June 5 ~"McCrea is left wondering whether his cattle were needlessly
slaughtered and whether he'll ever get the answers to the many questions he
has..
..about the system that led to the confiscation and destruction of a herd
that took his family years to build."
McCrea says CFIA lacking answers to BSE questions (external link)
....
It's eerily quiet on the McCrea farm these days and all cattle are all gone.
The quiet intensifies sounds like the rain pelted against a metal surface
and the wind blowing across miles of open space.
The quiet gives Trevor McCrea time to think and he's has a lot of questions
that demand answers.
He still doesn't understand why the DNA tests couldn't prove the infected
cow wasn't born on his farm.
"I would just sit down with these scientists and have them explain to me why
they couldn't get a real clear cut answer you know, just more of an
explanation from them what went on, or why it didn't work," says McCrea.
It's been nearly a week since his herd of Black Angus cattle were taken by
the Canadian Food Inspection Agency and tested for BSE and he feels that the
agency hasn't treated his family with the respect they deserve.
McCrea says he doesn't want other farmers treated that way.
"I almost think that they should have a person that is your link with
them...that at any time of the day that you can contact them with
questions," says McCrea..."
See entry for May 26 where the ProMed moderator wrote: ".. there is no scientific justification for slaughtering herds that were in contact with the infected animal or its offspring. BSE cannot be passed by casual contact."
June 5 ~ When someone asked if
anyone in Govt. would listen, the facilitator replied "Margaret Beckett
said she will respond and I'm taking her at her word".
We have been sent this report from the GM Nation public debate in Birmingham. "My feeling was that the whole thing was a charade to give us the impression that the public's views counted. This was summed up by one of the reporters. The Prime Minister is in favour of GM and the majority
of the public is against. What assurances can you give us that our
views will not be ignored as they were before the Iraq War?" This was
greeted by loud applause...."
June 4 ~ Canadian Officials To Slaughter 650 More Cattle
Canada's Mad Cow Probe Stalled By DNA Test "Officials have already slaughtered 1,160 head of cattle, but they say they
have to keep checking cattle because DNA testing has failed to confirm the
origin of the lone cow known to be infected. Knowing where the cow came from
could let investigators pinpoint the source of the infection."
June 4 ~ Farmers are going to start asking, "Why
should we carry on producing food at a loss?"
Article in the Spectator by the farmer Michael Wigan Extract:"If agriculture takes up half the EU budget, Britain could demand the halving of its European contribution, huge funds thereby becoming available to market our farm goods worldwide and make our farming industries the competitive, cutting-edge industries they once were. Farmers could grow new crops without being disadvantaged by a competing CAP-cushioned crop, supported by the sort of aggressive marketing which made New Zealand, after subsidies were dropped, synonymous with global products......The supermarkets would whimper a bit if Britain left the
CAP. It has suited them well to have farmers hog-tied with red tape, devoid
(unlike themselves) of parliamentary representation and producing predictable
crops. In many foodstuffs, supermarkets control 80 per cent of sales; that
stranglehold would be loosened if farmers were free to grow whatever they
wished....
...The fishing industry has been so savaged by
domestic politicians that fishermen have created a breakaway group -- Save
Britain's Fish -- which advocates leaving the Common Fisheries Policy. Farmers
have yet to follow the same logic, anaesthetised, for the most part, by the £3
billion drip-feed from Europe. A combination of more intrusion (subsidies to
livestock farmers will soon depend on welfare officers' approval) and
shrivelling state payments (in the pipeline) may change that....
... times change, and a further acceleration of the already ballooning
balance-of-trade deficit may yet pry open the modish anti-farmer mindset."
More and more people are saying now that subsidies are there to control farmers not farming.
June 3/4 ~ Western Morning News publishes 2 opposing views on GM
They are worth looking at side by side - we notice that the "pro" article, by Biotech expert Bernard Marantelli, relies on the Brooms Barn research - criticised by farm as fraudulent, and on "golden rice". But see Jeremy Rifkin's article above: "...The biotech industry has been singing the praises of the "miracle" rice for years, despite articles in scientific journals that say it simply doesn't work. To convert beta-carotene into vitamin A the body requires sufficient body protein and fat. Undernourished children lack the body protein necessary for the conversion."
June 3/4 ~ "I would respectfully ask our visionary prime minister to explain what the hell he thinks he is doing in France"
George Monbiot in the Guardian today Africa's scar gets angrier
(external link)
At Evian, the world's rich nations missed a golden opportunity to back fair trade
"A few weeks ago, President Chirac ... wanted to show that the G8 summit he is hosting in Evian, which concludes today, would offer something other than just the usual spectacle of the rich and powerful deciding how they would make themselves still richer and more powerful. He approached the US government to suggest that Europe would stop subsidising its exports of food to Africa if America did the same.
....Chirac's proposals ... could have begun the process of dismantling the system which does so much harm to our pockets, our environment and the lives of some of the world's most vulnerable people.
.... But our prime minister, instead, has single-handedly destroyed the French initiative. The reason will by now be familiar. George Bush, who receives substantial political support from US agro-industrialists, grain exporters and pesticide manufacturers, was not prepared to make the concessions required to match Chirac's offer. .... as soon as Blair made it clear that he would not back Chirac's plan, the initiative was dead.
So, thanks to our conscience-stricken prime minister,
and his statesmanlike habit of doing whatever Bush tells him to, Africa is now well and truly stuffed. . ..."
June 3/4 ~ Bush's Evangelizing About Food Chills European Hearts
The Guardian on Monday
" ...Hunger in the third world is a complex phenomenon not likely to be reversed by the introduction of GM crops. ...
Today, 21% of the food grown in the developing world is destined for animal consumption. In many developing countries, more than a third of the grain is now being grown for livestock. The animals, in turn, will be eaten by the world's wealthiest consumers in the northern industrial countries. The result is that the world's richest consumers eat a diet high in animal protein, while the poorest people on earth are left with little land to grow food grain for their own families. And, even the land that is available is often owned by global agribusiness interests.....
Second, President Bush ...ignores is that GM seeds are more expensive than conventional seeds and, because they are patented, farmers cannot save the new seeds for planting....companies such as Monsanto stand to make huge profits while the world's poorest farmers become increasingly marginalized.
"golden rice", a new genetically engineered rice strain that contains an inserted gene that produces beta-carotene. Noting that half a million poor children around the world suffer from vitamin A deficiency and become blind, the US trade representative Robert Zoellick argues that to deny them this valuable food source would be immoral. ...articles in scientific journals that say it simply doesn't work. ..." (More)
June 3/4 ~ GM Nation debate is a "catalogue of errors from start to finish"
Consumers' Association director Sheila McKechnie: "The debate has been very badly organised.
The Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs appointed the Central Office of Information, not an organisation that's got much experience of this kind of thing, and in the last few months it's becoming very obvious the whole thing is chaotic."
June 3 ~ The Independent Science Panel on GM Final Report
(See ISIS report) "Dozens of prominent scientists from seven countries, spanning the disciplines of agroecology, agronomy, biomathematics, botany, chemical medicine, ecology, histopathology, microbial ecology, molecular genetics, nutritional biochemistry, physiology, toxicology and virology, joined forces to launch themselves as an Independent Science Panel on GM at a public conference, attended by UK environment minister Michael Meacher and 200 other participants, in London on 10 May 2003.
The conference coincided with the publication of a draft report, The Case for a GM-free Sustainable World, calling for a ban on GM crops to make way for all forms of sustainable agriculture. This authoritative report, billed as "the strongest, most complete dossier of evidence" ever compiled on the problems and hazards of GM crops as well as the manifold benefits of sustainable agriculture, is being finalised for release 15 June 2003...."
June 3 ~ NFU Mutual refuse to insure against GM contamination
NFU Mutual says it will not underwrite potential losses for organic or
conventional farmers even if the technology gets the go-ahead, claiming
it would be "irresponsible to provide insurance when working in the
dark". See Western Morning News (external link)
June 3 ~ GM: " Franz Fischler's suggestion (of "co-existence") - that each European nation creates its own voluntary code and that farmers voluntarily tell their neighbours if they are growing GM crops - was widely ridiculed.
Article in Western Morning News Such "co-existence" has failed expensively in the USA and Canada on many occasions. But what are the supposed benefits for which we are expected to pay this price?
...There are still only four GM crops of any commercial significance - soya, maize, canola and cotton. There was no evidence that GM increased overall yields. Africa's food and agriculture spokesmen and western aid charities agree that GM crops are irrelevant to solving world hunger. Only one nation in Africa (South Africa) has chosen to commercialise any GM crops. In India, GM cotton has failed catastrophically and there is fear that a major GM cotton project will clear up to 20,000,000 cotton smallholders off their land to make way for vast automated farms that employ few people and only benefit the richest farmers.
ActionAid recently campaigned against a GM coffee designed to do away with the need to employ the 60,000,000 coffee pickers who work in many of the world's 50 poorest nations. Farmers' unions from India to the Philippines to Brazil have organised the destruction of GM crop trial sand protests against Monsanto, while African farmers at the Earth Summit issued a joint declaration against GM crops.
Farm Scale Evaluations (FSEs) of GM crops in the UK have been called fraudulent because they compared a commercially-grown non-GM crop with a GM one grown to maximise wildlife rather than yield. ...." More
See farm critique -- Broom Barns' GM sugar beet research
June 3 ~ "There has to be a genuine debate. The Government must not spin its way to a decision it has already reached before that debate has taken place"
A press release from Shadow DEFRA Secretary David Lidington says: "The public deserves a clear scientific assessment of the environmental consequences of allowing GM crops to be grown in their country. It would be quite wrong for Ministers to sweep those issues under the carpet with a poorly advertised 'national debate', and then press ahead without even waiting for the results of its own field trials."
"As for GM food, it's a matter of consumer rights. Customers have the right to know if the food they are buying has GM ingredients. That means a clear, honest system of labelling."
warmwell's GM page
June 2 ~"It's obscure. It's small scale. It's been starved of funds. It has not been nationally advertised. In fact, it hasn't been advertised at all. You could be forgiven for thinking the Government doesn't want you to know about it."
The Independent today
"Yet this is the National GM Debate. Starting tomorrow, it will be the only official chance people will have to make their views known over whether genetically modified crops should be commercially grown in Britain.....One of the crops intended for Britain, Bayer's GM fodder maize, already has
its EU approval. Under current Brussels law, the only way Britain could now
prevent its commercial use would be to find new evidence of harm either to
people or the environment.
The farm-scale trials could provide this; if they do, commercialisation of GM
may be prevented. But if they do not, sometime this autumn the Government is
likely to give the go-ahead for the GM age to begin in our countryside.
But tomorrow it is finally going ahead, and people can have their say on one
of the most important decisions that will ever be taken about the environment in
Britain.
Whether or not the Government takes heed is another question"
See arguments for and against GMOs on warmwell's GM page
June 2 ~ Light, portable device to detect biological agents
Mary Marshall has drawn our attention to a recent press release from the American Society of Microbiology, about the development of a new
PCR device, called RazorTM, which operates like its R.A.P.I.D. machine (reported in her submissions to Defra), except that it is hand-portable and can function in a moving vehicle.
"...Real-time PCR machines will be an essential component of the response to a bio-terrorist attack. Such machines should be portable, have low power consumption and require minimal expertise or equipment to operate," says Mark Poritz of Idaho Technology, one of the lead researchers on the study. "The RAPID, at 50 pounds and requiring a 110-volt power source is best used in a field hospital setting. A small, battery operated instrument is needed for true field operations."
Poritz and his colleagues present data today on a new PCR device, called RazorTM, that weighs only 8 pounds and can analyze 12 samples in 22 minutes running only on battery power. The Razor uses thin-film plastic pouches as reaction containers. The pouches are preloaded with freeze-dried PCR reagents and the DNA samples loaded into the machine using syringes so there is minimal operator setup
"Because of its ease of use and portability the Razor should have multiple uses in diagnostics and environmental testing," says Poritz..."
Although the Razor device has been developed with bioterrorist activity in mind, its usefulness as a rapid test in field conditions for such pathogens as FMD (whether naturally introduced or intentionally introduced) must surely be of great interest to the UK - whose FMD Contingency Plan, for example, is still reticent on the subject of available technology for rapid on-site diagnosis.
June 1 ~ Virus danger shuts down hospital labs - The problems are not just confined to hospital laboratories.
Inspectors act to prevent deadly germ leaks after safety lapses
Antony Barnett, public affairs editor of the Observer, writes today about the instances of safety lapses in
high-security laboratories in hospitals. In the past 10 months three hospital laboratories have been forced to close after government inspectors feared the possibility of potentially deadly viruses.
"Inspectors criticised another hospital laboratory in London last April for breaking safety rules in its work with a genetically modified virus that can cause dangerous respiratory illnesses in young children.
In the worst case, health and safety inspectors visiting the Royal Brompton in Chelsea - one of central London's top hospitals - were so alarmed by its breach of safety rules at its microbiological laboratory that they ordered all its work on dangerous pathogens to stop immediately. ..."
"....The problems are not just confined to hospital laboratories. Health and Safety Executive documents obtained by The Observer reveal that in September 1999, Huntingdon Life Sciences in Cambridgeshire was criticised for breaching rule relating to BSE that it had administered to mice.
The firm, which has been criticised by animal rights activists for its experiments on animals, was accused of inspectors of being a 'bit dirty and a bit messy' with the way it treated BSE waste."
It will be remembered by some that the source of the foot and mouth outbreak in this country has never been established. Suggestions that virus may have somehow come from Pirbright or from the Ministry of Defence's biological warfare research centre at Porton Down or that it had escaped from a MAFF experimental farm in the north of England ( where the ministry had been testing vaccines) have apparently never been officially investigated.
June 1 2003 ~ " industry is still pushing for a decision on future commercialisation, even though as the Royal Society acknowledged this week, the long-term impacts still remain unknown."
Do not promote poor science letter in the Financial Times
From Dr Tim Jenkins.
Sir, Instead of calling on the government to support technology industries unquestioningly in the face of public opposition, ("Research 'stunted by our culture of protest'", May 27), industry should look at why the public is so concerned by their so-called science.
Take the case of GM. The biotechnology industries are pushing for the introduction of genetically modified crops into our countryside, but have failed to provide the scientific data to show that such crops are safe. Nor have they managed to put forward a convincing argument as to why we need GM.
Instead, the government has carried out farm-scale trials in a half-hearted attempt to look at the environmental impacts. And industry is still pushing for a decision on future commercialisation, even though as the Royal Society acknowledged this week, the long-term impacts still remain unknown.
Science holds great potential for solving many of the world's problems. But it is frequently bankrolled by multinational companies, which are too often more interested in how they can develop their profits than in solving problems.
The government should not be in the business of promoting poor science. Indeed, it should demand higher standards from industry, so that the public benefits are made clear. Improved corporate regulation, as proposed in the corporate responsibility bill, would be a step in the right direction, obliging companies to recognise the rights of stakeholders as well as shareholders and forcing company directors to look beyond the financial bottom line.
Tim Jenkins, Policy Director, Friends of the Earth, London N1 7JQ
(warmwell.com's updated GM page)
June 1 2003 ~ "just wanted to let you know what is happening re this issue of DEFRA etc."
Janet Hughes writes:
"The ECHR (European Court of Human Rights) is considering the case this coming week and I do hope that the Court will not reject it in view of Defra's actions recently. I'll let you know what the decision is as soon as I hear.
Defra is stalling in replying to the local solicitor and it now seems as if an application will have to be made for revocation of this Writ. It has definitely been obtained improperly and the High Court has colluded with Defra on this. "
May 28 ~ "Millions of others were unseen, unsung and
uncompensated ..."
A very angry article about the foot and mouth crisis was published yesterday in the Western Morning News. It illustrates well how people who suffered are still feeling - and how very far from receding into the past is the experience of FMD 2001. Extract:"....Some of the casualties of MAFF ineptitude were obvious - the farming
families who were subjected to bullying, brutality, bureaucracy and
force majeure and saw their lives' work rotting outside their windows,
then going up in smoke. Millions of others were unseen, unsung and
uncompensated - the farmers isolated and starved of accurate
information, unable to trade or to move stock for month after month; the
animals thus stranded in mires without fodder; the children subjected to
ineradicable trauma; the many, many small, struggling,
agriculture-related industries.
And when it was all over? It wasn't all over. It continues to this day.
Hobbled businesses stagger into bankruptcy. Farms deprived of income for
all that time are sold, having never recovered. One of the "lucky"
victims, Bruce Ayre, who had 2,500 sheep and 250 cattle killed, said
yesterday: "We're just getting back to normal now, and 'normal' will
never mean the same again after we turned to our ministry for help and
were rewarded with inefficiency, appalling and ignorant ministry vets,
inept, bungling soldiery and slow, draconian, insensitive bureaucracy."
May 28 ~ DEFRA offers £110,000 a year for "an enthusiastic
and effective ambassador for rural communities" to "make a discernible
difference to rural economic productivity".
See today's Western Morning News(external link) " ..
Mr Lidington said: "If this means that Defra is going to change the way
it works then that is welcome but given the record so far, I'm sceptical
that it is anything more than a cosmetic gesture. "What I want to see is evidence that ministers, from Margaret Beckett
downwards, are actually listening to people who are working in the
countryside and are starting to address their problems.
"We have had a whole series of disasters - foot and mouth, bovine TB and
farm stock burial. A great deal has gone wrong, and simply paying the
salary of another Sir Humphrey isn't going to put that right.
"There is a fundamental and radical shift in approach needed by Margaret
Beckett and her ministers.
"It has got to be recognition that what happens in the countryside
matters. I think there is little evidence that it is regarded as a high
priority."
However, Anthony Gibson, regional director of the National Farmers'
Union, said that the appointment could be a good thing for the farming
community, although he regretted that such a rural champion did not
already exist within Defra. He said: "I think it is very important that
farming does have a champion to try and explain what is happening in
farming to the world and make the connections between the farming
community and the rest of society...."
May 28 ~ " I hope that who ever they appoint
has a strong stomach, because Defra has precisely nil respect from the
farming community."
Yesterday's Western Morning News (external link) on the subject of the"six-figure salary for a troubleshooter who
can improve its image in the countryside in the wake of the foot and
mouth crisis."
".... Beth Coles, who with her husband Patrick farms cattle and sheep in North
Cornwall, said: "All I can say is that I hope that who ever they appoint
has a strong stomach, because Defra has precisely nil respect from the
farming community." And Ian Hodgett of Lewdown, West Devon, who fought
to save 300 ewes in lamb and 50 bullocks which were condemned during the
foot and mouth epidemic, warned: "Whoever takes this job will have to
have common sense and brilliant communication skills, because he or she
has a steep hill to climb."
The appointment has been seen at Westminster as a sign that Defra is
determined to try to improve its patchy image in the countryside.
Colin Breed, a member of the Commons rural affairs committee, welcomed
the move but said it was no substitute for a more far-reaching shake-up
of the department itself....."
May 27 ~ "Defra complain that farmers haven't signed up
to the stock collection scheme but the Department's dithering over its
organisation of the scheme is at the root of the problem." Andrew George Liberal Democrat shadow
rural affairs secretary.
The Newcastle Journal reports: "....Andrew George has written to Secretary of State Margaret
Beckett, after reports suggested that only one third of livestock farmers
have signed up so far.
They only have until May 28 to do so.
"The burial ban is simply unenforceable until the official
regulation has been laid before Parliament. And as the stock collection
scheme will not be ready until August at the earliest the Government cannot
expect farmers to foot the bill for delays which could have been avoided by
Defra.
"Some farmers have told me that they have received two letters
from Defra, while others have been asked to join despite giving up livestock
farming or retiring altogether.
"The subscription deadline must be put back to at least July,
giving the Department time to sort itself out, check that its benchmark is
the right one and consult the industry."
We do not yet know for certain what causes BSE or how it may or may not affect human beings. Lack of funding for independent research means that much legislation such as the banning of on-farm burial, which is highly damaging to small farmers, is not necessarily based on sound science.
May 27 ~ "The problem is that the additives, properly known as antibiotic
digestive enhancers, are not injected. They are given in feed."
According to the Guardian today, "the use of additives to hasten poultry growth is back on the rise, despite
NFU pledge to phase them out" Extract:
"Question: Are the chickens injected with growth promoters?
Answer: No, none of the chickens covered by the farm assurance scheme
is injected with antibiotic growth promoters.
That is how Assured Chicken Production, the industry's
standards-setting body, and the "little red tractor" scheme that seeks to
assure consumers about food production standards, dealt with the issues of
chicken growth promoters.
.... by yesterday, after the Guardian had talked to
members of the industry, that question and answer had disappeared from the
body's website which lists common queries about the assured chicken scheme.
The problem is that the additives, properly known as antibiotic
digestive enhancers, are not injected. They are given in feed.....
One of the growth promoters still in use in chicken production is
avilamycin. Commission scientists were worried by the fact that an
antibiotic of the same class, evernimicin, was in development for combating
"superbugs" in hospitals.
..... the Soil Association believes that this family of drugs
could affect human medicine. The association says there is still a
possibility that bacteria in people could quickly develop resistance to such
drugs because food for humans might stem from animals given similar
antibiotics...."
May 27 ~ GMOs " It will not be enough to make best estimates at the start
and then assume that everything will turn out as expected..."
Scientists urge close scrutiny of GM crops' impact
By Robert Uhlig, Farming Correspondent of the Daily Telegraph
"....The Royal Society issued the warning in a submission to the GM Science
Review, one of three investigations set up by the Government to assess
whether to introduce commercial cultivation of GM crops.
"We advised the Government almost five years ago that it
needed to carry out a review of the way in which the environmental
impact of GM crops is monitored in the long term, but it still hasn't
taken the necessary action.
If the decision is taken to allow commercial planting of GM crops, it
is essential that regulators in the UK and EU monitor the environmental
impact to pick up any potentially beneficial or harmful effects over a
long period. It will not be enough to make best estimates at the start
and then assume that everything will turn out as expected." Professor Patrick Bateson, vice-president and biological secretary of the
Royal Society
See also warmwell page on genetic modification
May 27 ~ No scientific justification (see below) - but the slaughter happens regardless
The entire herd on the Saskatchewan farm where officials believe the BSE positive cow lived for
four years have been killed. Cattle from three Alberta farms where the diseased cow's calves
and other relatives were sent were also slaughtered and tested.
All 192 cattle from the diseased cow's most
recent farm tested negative for BSE. The National Centre for Foreign Animal Disease in Winnipeg (mentioned on warmwell before in connection with FMD research) is testing the brain tissue of 400 cows from
three ranches. Investigators are using DNA testing to determine how the
brain-wasting disease got into the Canadian cattle industry.
The Globe and Mail (Canada) report says Although no more farms were quarantined yesterday, officials did not
rule out the possibility that more would be. Seventeen are under quarantine:
12 in Alberta, three in British Columbia and two in Saskatchewan.
The financially disastrous ban by the US and other major importers of Canadian beef continues as a result of the finding of this one isolated case of a BSE positive cow. The cattle industry has lost an estimated $66 million so far. The comparison with terrorism in the final paragraph of the newspaper report is more thought-provoking than was perhaps intended. Mere
belief in the BSE/vCJD link - yet to be proven - is threatening economic disaster in Canada. Fear of BSE, like fear of terrorism, can give the raison d'etre for restrictions no one feels able to question.
May 26 ~ ".. there is no
scientific justification for slaughtering herds that were in contact with
the infected animal or its offspring. BSE cannot be passed by casual contact."
The moderator of the Pro-Med site (a program of the
International Society for Infectious Diseases) once again cannot allow to pass without comment the statements in articles posted on the Pro-Med site about the possible slaughtering of herds that may have been in contact with the cow from Alberta that tested positive to BSE.
Dr. Claude Lavigne, a top official with the Canadian Food
Inspection Agency, is quoted as saying: "We have to determine whether this animal has offspring
in other herds, and that is still under investigation," and he told a
news conference in Edmonton that he was unable to say how many animals were being
quarantined or whether they would be slaughtered .. ..Dr. Lavigne said Canada has no plans to use the rapid tests for BSE that
have been adopted in some European countries, although it's an alternative
that must be considered.
We read here too that Indonesia announced on Thursday that it will refuse Canadian beef, joining the
United States, Australia, South Korea, Singapore, New Zealand, and Japan.
May 24/25 ~ Peaster should have called a vet to look at the ailing animal.
This article from the Edmonton Journal (external link) raises an ethical question: ".... Ron Glaser, who speaks for the Alberta Beef Producers, said Friday that
Peaster should have called a vet to look at the ailing animal. The vet could
have euthanized the cow and sent her brain tissue for testing.
"An animal that cannot stand, that cannot load under its own power, should
not be shipped to market," he said..."
Marwyn Peaster's sick cow, now referred to inevitably as "Cow Zero" might perhaps, in addition to causing economic and political shock waves, help give the go-ahead in Canada for even stricter regulations - not unfortunately to protect the welfare of the cows or protect them from disease - but rather to keep the unfortunate creatures away from human dinner plates. As another article in the same newspaper puts it:
"... the time has come for sterner measures. ... We must make clear to Canadians, and the
world, that when it comes to fighting BSE, we're on a war footing."
All very reminiscent of 2001 and "bearing down on the disease", but, as then, things are unlikely to improve until the science improves. While independent research continues to be stifled, the uncertainties surrounding BSE, its causes and its dangers, will continue to fuel fear, have huge economic consequences and provide the excuse for yet more draconian counter-measures. ( See BSE/vCJD page)
May 24/25 ~ Saskatchewan's Agriculture Minister warns that widespread slaughter of
quarantined cattle may be "the only way to restore public confidence"
13 farms have now been quarantined. The final paragraph of the news report from CBC News today repeats the old mantra : "It's believed that people who eat meat from BSE-infected cows have a slight risk of developing Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease, a human variation of the illness "
"Everyone knows that the claimed link between BSE and the singularly unpleasant disease "new variant CJD" set off the greatest and most expensive food scare in history..." wrote Christopher Booker last Sunday before the news of this latest Canadian scare - but this fear based on a "belief", this apparent "slight risk" is still capable of miserable consequences. We are reminded of those who, in 2001, hunted down the FMD virus in the manner of the Witch Finder General, slaughtering healthy animals literally in their millions. The feelings and lives of ordinary people and the welfare of the animals were as nothing compared to the horror of finding even suspected traces of the "disease" on their patch.
May 24/25 ~ "it was DEFRA who had chosen to focus upon the one single negative review"
Mark Purdey writes about his meeting on May 15th with Michael Meacher and Tom King. "They seemed more than keen to ensure that I was funded properly for my research, but then sadly handed me over to the very same senior government officials in the chief science group who were responsible for rejecting my last grant application. So once again, it seems that the officials, as opposed to the Ministers, have the final control of what research directions are followed.
....
Considering four and a half of the five reviewers had actually come out in support of funding my three year research study, it was DEFRA who had chosen to focus upon the one single negative review and run with that at the end of the day - irrespective of the validity of my protest.
So was I naive enough to have my fingers burnt yet again; and watch all my latest red hot data get whisked away and publicly ridiculed, but then, ironically, plagiarized and cuckooed out by some suitably 'tame' professor, appointed by DEFRA, into a further application that gets submitted to some alternative funding body like the EU and then funded to the tune of one million pounds?
That ordeal personally destroyed me and my family."
The "infectious prion" theory if disproved, could destroy the reputations of a very powerful and influential group. Those who are not politically wedded to the accepted theory are simply not getting the necessary funding to carry through their work. .
May 24/25 ~ the demand to establish virtual zero risk for any material that could have BSE/TSE contamination is an extreme precautionary approach in the context of other food risks, that has involved enormous costs.
Professor Jim Bridges (chair of the European Commission's toxicity committee)
'The precautionary principle has been employed widely, without its application necessarily being acknowledged. For example, the demand to establish virtual zero risk for any material that could have BSE/TSE contamination is an extreme precautionary approach in the context of other food risks, that has involved enormous costs. ...
'My biggest and unquantifiable concern, however, is that the precautionary principle may provide a major disincentive to innovation.'
See Science, risk and the price of precaution
by Sandy Starr at spiked-online.com. "Restoring public confidence" seems to have become a very useful argument for getting away with murder. The public would surely be more confident if there were accountabilty. The precautionary principle seems to have moved far beyond the realm of common sense.
May 22 ~ EU Parliament votes for stricter GM labelling
From the Friends of the Earth website (external link)
" Brussels, 22 May.
The European Parliament Environment Committee today voted for stronger laws governing GM labeling and traceability. The vote, one week after the United States started a
WTO complaint against the EU, paves the way for better consumer choice and action to protect organic and non-GM farmers from genetic contamination.
The vote by the Environment Committee called for stricter rules on the labelling and traceability of GMOs and for legally binding rules to secure non- genetically modified (GM) agriculture and non-GM food in Europe. ..."
May 21 ~ "The circumstantial evidence is compelling, but it has not been proven scientifically..."
It is interesting that the moderator of the Pro-Med site is scrupulous in adding these words in parenthesis to the latest statements on Pro-Med (external link) about the cow in Alberta that has been diagnosed with "mad cow disease" (see below)
"Humans develop new variant CJD when they eat meat from infected animals, scientists believe. [The circumstantial evidence is compelling, but it has not been proven scientifically. - Mod PC/JW] "
Such a respectable source as Pro-Med cannot allow such statements to pass without commenting that widely accepted belief does not constitute scientific fact and that the evidence is "circumstantial".
May 21 ~ BSE Madness - One dead Canadian cow causes mayhem. The US immediately bans all Canadian cattle, sheep and goats, meat and other products. Tyson and McDonalds shares plummet...
The unfortunate cow, killed last winter but tested positively for BSE only on friday, threatens to set off a panic like the one that caused the economic crisis in Japan late in 2001. At least 150 more Canadian cows will now be slaughtered owing to the idée fixe that BSE spreads like wildfire and can be countered only by mass killing. The incident merited a nationally broadcast news conference.
Reuters report (external link) :"
....The actual test was taken Jan. 31 from a cow in Fairview, Alberta," an official with the Canadian Beef Export Federation said. "It's just one isolated case of an eight-year-old cow."
... the report sent a major chill through the continent's economy, triggering a U.S. ban on Canadian beef and sparking a sell-off in cattle futures and food-related stocks such as hamburger giant McDonald's Corp. The currency in Canada, the world's third-largest beef exporter, also fell after the news .... northern Alberta herd of 150 animals will be slaughtered...." I want to stress that the animal did not go into the food chain,"
Other herds had yet to be quarantined. "We've only been investigating this for about 24 hours," a government scientist said.
.....
."
Such shock waves strengthen the case for proper independent research to be funded and humane common sense to return to the area of animal disease control. One cannot but be reminded of the witch-hunt mentality, panic killing and economic repercussions of the FMD crisis.
May 21 ~ The stock-response belief that BSE kills people is still widespread;
Professor Stan Prusiner said, "A million cattle infected with BSE entered the British food chain so almost everyone in the country will have been exposed to the infectious prion proteins that cause variant CJD..." - and who would dare to doubt a Nobel Prize winner when he implies that BSE is "infectious" and that we in the UK should all be tested for vCJD?
Fear of vCJD through eating BSE infected meat seems to be as powerfully instilled in populations as fear of terrorism and has similarly given rise to a vast number of regulations and restrictions. Genuinely independent research into TSEs is not likely to receive public funding - or else, like that of Professor Ebringer and others, gets deprived of funding at the whim of SEAC and DEFRA if it questions orthodox views. However, even Professor Roy Anderson's team (external link) now says that 40 is a reasonable prediction of deaths from vCJD - whereas formerly we read, from the same modellers (who, it will not be forgotten, were largely responsible for the excessive culling policies of FMD), predictions of thousands of deaths from eating BSE- infected beef.
It is ironic that news of the hysterical reaction to a single case in Canada should follow so closely on the heels of Christopher Booker's article on Sunday; Britain's most expensive myth .
See also BSE/CJD page
May 20 ~"... knowledge commodified and subject to market forces"
David Bellamy, first speaker of the newly launched Independent Science Panel on May 10th at King's College London (at which Michael Meacher was present), "decried the folly of the human race that put us at odds with Nature, and lamented the trappings of modern universities, with knowledge commodified and subject to market forces. He called for a return to the original meanings of education and philosophy, which are essentially teaching about life in a holistic manner. "We are doing that today; we are discussing no small matter, of how we ought. to live," he said.
See report from the I-SIS website at http://www.i-sis.org.uk/ISP.php The Independent Science Panel (ISP) was set in motion after Micheal Meacher, suggested that GM technology is not necessary to solve world hunger and could prove dangerous over the longer term. Mr Meacher addressed the conference. He said that the GM Science Review will not be making their final report until after the public debate, adding that he welcomed the ISP's input into the national GM debate. But in the light of his statement below, this does not mean that the overwhelming distrust of the public and the sound arguments of the scientists in the new independent body will necessarily be able to make a scrap of difference.
May 20 ~ Ethical or moral reasons do not count. It is impossible under EU rules for Britain to stop GM crops being grown commercially....
Today's Guardian "Meacher admits GM crops threaten organic output"
Mr Meacher is all too aware that "....Though consumers might be opposed to GM crops .. it was impossible under EU rules for Britain to stop them being grown commercially, unless it found health or environmental evidence they were harmful. Ethical or moral reasons did not count. "
"Mr Meacher said the government was awaiting a report from an advisory body, the agriculture and environment biotechnology commission, on how to make it possible to combine GM, organic and conventional farming.
.."
Ethical and moral reasons have not seemed to count for much for a great while now - but it was nevertheless refreshing to see that Michael Meacher could actually say so. They counted for tragically little in the FMD crisis - but surely that is not to say that we should willingly accept this state of affairs in today's affairs of state. Faced with so much arrogant muscle from the Goliath industries so eager to make a killing, our little David attempts to stand up for the ethical and the moral are even more important. In the Ecologist interview last March, Michael Meacher pointed out that the government does not have the funds or manpower to conduct its own trials into GMOs. He said, "The question is: can we trust the companies and be sure that they are telling us all they know? When asked if the system (of crop testing) is adequate, it is difficult to give the answer 'yes'. The system is very trusting and that is very worrying."
We share his worries.
May 18 ~ Britain's most expensive myth
Sunday Telegraph Booker's Notebook
"Everyone knows that the claimed link between BSE and the singularly unpleasant disease "new variant CJD" set off the greatest and most expensive food scare in history. In the days that followed the health minister Stephen Dorrell's fateful announcement in March 1996, predictions of deaths from eating beef ranged from 500,000 by the government's chief BSE scientist, John Patteson, to many millions (The Observer).
With very few exceptions (this column being one), the media unquestioningly accepted that there was such a link. As one result, £3 billion of public money was spent on incinerating elderly cows. The costs to industry and the UK economy, not least from a consequent thicket of further regulations, have been many times that, and are still continuing.
The chief reason for doubting a link between beef and CJD lay in the epidemiological evidence, which even in 1996 suggested that the promised epidemic was a fantasy. Over the past seven years, as the incidence curve has begun a steady fall, that has seemed ever more certain. Now, after reviewing the evidence, Professor Roy Anderson and his Imperial College team have published a revised estimate of the total number of victims likely to die of vCJD in the future (link available through www.warmwell.com). Their figure? Not 400,000, or 40,000, just 40.
As Britain's farming and food industry grapples with the latest regulatory insanity inspired by the BSE scare, the EU Animal By-Products Regulation that is predicted to drain billions more pounds from the UK economy, it is clearer than ever that Mr Dorrell's monumentally foolish statement in 1996 was the most costly blunder ever perpetrated by a British minister."
May 17 ~ The EU Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health has given North Rhine-Westphalia permission to vaccinate zoo birds.
ProMed site (external link) Second outbreak of avian influenza suspected in Kleve, Germany:.... The EU's Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health met this
week to discuss again the avian influenza situation in the Netherlands,
Belgium, and Germany. ...Germany may also decide to apply vaccination
against avian influenza of susceptible birds in zoos and in recognised
centres for endangered species in the area west of the Rhine of North
Rhine-Westphalia.
The situation and measures with regard to avian influenza in the
Netherlands, Belgium, and Germany will be reviewed at the next meeting of
the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health scheduled for 28
May 2003...... In the Netherlands, approximately 28 million birds have already been slaughtered.
May 16/17 ~ Stop the slaughter "The issue of whether or not vaccinations should be carried out after an outbreak so as to avoid a mass cull of birds is a moral one"
BBC report (external link) "In Germany, the first confirmed case of a highly contagious bird flu has led to a call for a pan-European strategy of vaccinations to prevent the further spread of the disease."The issue of whether or not vaccinations should be carried out after an outbreak so as to avoid a mass cull of birds is a moral one," writes Berlin's Der Tagesspiegel. It concludes that Germany should advocate an EU-wide vaccination strategy inorder to avoid "great pyres" already seen in Belgium and the Netherlands."
May 16 ~ Avian influenza
Fears continue that avian flu may be fast approaching the UK
From Pro-Med site (external link) ".....Mr Scudamore added it was vital that producers notify their vet immediately
if they suspect disease or have sick birds on their holding. Early clinical
signs of avian influenza include increased mortality, falling egg
production, signs of respiratory disease, and a drop in food consumption.
His comments follow preliminary results indicating the first case in
Germany within the avian influenza protection zone covering the
German/Dutch/Belgian borders..."
The slaughtering of huge numbers of birds continues.
May 16 ~ "The authorities put the interests of
a small group of exporters before the interests of hundreds of thousands of
animal lovers."
From the same site we read:" The Society for Animal Protection, together with the Dutch Association of
Pet Animal Owners (NBvH), have delivered today a petition to the Minister
of Agriculture Veerman against the culling of pet chickens and other birds,
accompanied by 10 000 signatures... According to the daily Agrarisch Dagblad, 15 May 2003, the NBvH -- which
numbers about 8000 members -- stated: "The authorities put the interests of
a small group of exporters before the interests of hundreds of thousands of
animal lovers." They have urged all animal lovers in The Netherlands to
boycott the bio-industry and the products of the relevant egg-producing and
breeding farms (which are to be repopulated, within the infected areas,
after the culling of susceptible pet avians in the said areas).
http://www.promedmail.org/pls/askus "... Courts in The Netherlands and
Belgium have rejected lawsuits filed by owners of pet birds to prevent the
cullings. - Mod.AS]"
May 16 ~ These fine compassionate words from the 1954 Protection of Birds Act...
"If any person keeps or confines any bird whatsoever in any cage or their receptacle which is not sufficient in height, length or breadth to permit the bird to stretch its wings freely, he shall be guilty of an offence against the Act and be liable to a special penalty." (Quoted, Danny Penman, The Price of Meat, Gollancz, 1996, p.82) ...
are followed by a small proviso: "Provided that this subsection shall not apply to poultry...."
The factory farming of hens and pigs is something most people would prefer not to contemplate. However, the diseases now emerging cannot be ignored because they are hurting the producers as well as the unfortunate animals. That there is a connection between intensive "farm" practices and new strains of disease is surely becoming an inescapable conclusion.
May 16 ~ "The curious conviction that animals are without feelings has gone largely unchallenged to this day"
......A thought provoking article from Media Lens on May 14th Demolishing Compassion -
Greed, Profit, and Animals as 'Converting Machines' Extract:
" Mainstream culture has a vested interest in suppressing compassion for people and animals beyond our immediate circle of family and friends. The point is that self-seeking greed and compassion are opposed. Vested interests, such as advertisers, want us locked into desire mode, thinking primarily of ourselves, working hard to earn, buy and consume. The last thing our profit-maximising system wants is teenagers concerned about civilian victims of bombing in Iraq, or tortured animals in our farming system. Compassion, therefore, has to be ridiculed as 'naove' and 'sentimental'.......
"So persistent are the forces that militate against admitting the possibility of emotions in the lives of animals that the topic seems disreputable, not a respectable field of study, almost taboo...." (Jeffrey Masson and Susan McCarthy : When Elephants Weep - The Emotional Life of Animals)
May 15 ~
These
recent Parliamentary Questions and Answers into Foot and Mouth show
These issues are not going to go away. There are still far too many able people who are not convinced that lessons were learned from the foot and mouth crisis. Recommendations from the Royal Society about such urgent measures as emergency vaccination preparations show few signs of being followed up in the time scale considered adequate. The UK's refusal to get to grips with scientific advances in disease control continue to raise awkward questions - in spite of the government's evasions and refusal to hold a proper independent public inquiry.
May 15 ~ "A Memorial to the millions of animals killed during the foot-and- mouth
outbreak two years ago is to be unveiled by the Duchess of Hamilton..."
Daily Record Scotland - external link)
"A commemoration stone has been placed in a garden at the Mossburn Animal
Centre at Hightae, near Lockerbie, in Dumfriesshire.
Juanita Wilson, 56, who owns the sanctuary, saved 14 goats and three sheep
after taking her high-profile fight against the Scottish Executive's
pre-emptive cull policy to the courts.
The memorial, featuring a steel plaque expressing "outrage" at the mass
cull, is due to be unveiled on Saturday....."
There are now several such memorials in the UK. Mossburn's reaction to Serad's quite outrageous attempts to cull the sanctuary's healthy animals was mentioned several times on warmwell in 2001 - example
May 15 ~ Fallen Stock measures unworkable in practice?
"There may be some initial difficulties with implementation of the complete
ban on burial and open-burning of fallen stock," DEFRA say in a letter to
LACORS, the Local Authorities Coordinating Office on Regulatory Services.
"Where they face genuine difficulties we would ask that your members adopt a
proportionate approach to enforcement."
May 13/14 ~"if justice prevails and this case is heard, the revelations will lead to renewed pressure for a Public Inquiry into FMD..."
From a letter appearing in the Farmers Weekly (May 10) from Robert Persey.
Extract:" ... precedent has been set for a Public Inquiry, some time after the event, into FMD. More people lost their lives as a result of FMD than lost their lives on Bloody Sunday....."
May 13/14 ~".. An extended power to slaughter animals for disease
control/prevention reasons" Scotland
The Royal Society recommended that contingency planning must take heed of the "latest scientific and technological developments"- It was most certainly not suggesting an extension of legal powers to slaughter but rather paving the way for emergency vaccination in the event of a serious disease outbreak. Yet "Consultation" will close on May 23 to extend the new draconian powers of the Animal Health Act 2002 to Scotland as well as to England and Wales - (See consultation document on Animal Disease Control for Scotland http://www.scotland.gov.uk/consultations/agriculture/adcp-01.asp ) "The powers of Scottish Ministers are governed by the Animal Health Act
1981. Since then there have been a number of developments in the science of
disease control...... -
27. A possible Scottish Bill to amend the Animal Health Act 1981, so far as
Scotland is concerned, and to take new related powers, is likely to include
the following: An extended power to slaughter animals for disease
control/prevention reasons
-
30. The intention now is to make the slaughter powers explicit, i.e.
slaughter wherever this is necessary for disease control and prevention
reasons. ...The
proposed new power could include, for example, animals that had been
vaccinated against FMD. ..."
How it can be that the UK still clings to the need for powers to slaughter "pre-emptively" uninfected or vaccinated animals? The rapid diagnosis PCR tests for animal disease diagnosis would make such slaughter quite unnecessary; the UK continues to resist them. Why the constant excuse that rapid diagnosis tests are not yet "validated" when no such obstacle hinders the use of rapid diagnosis of human disease - in SARS for example? The US now accepts such tests for animal diseases.
It is surely DEFRA's responsibilty to ensure that this country's animal disease control makes use of the latest scientific and technological developments as soon as possible - and certainly by the end of 2003. Royal Society recommendations
May 12/13 ~ "The government is stifling science by concentrating research spending on certain universities and letting the rest languish" (In Brief column of the Times : May 12)
In a paragraph headed "Wrong formula" referring to Press Release from Royal Society we read:
"Wrong formula"
The government is stifling science by concentrating research spending on certain universities and letting the rest languish, the Royal Society says. In a new report it says that not all the best discoveries come from the "Golden Triangle" of London, Oxford and Cambridge.
Also of note is that on Wednesday 4 June at 7.30pm at the Town Hall, Cheltenham Robert May
will be in conversation with Roger Highfield of the Daily Telegraph as part of the Cheltenham Festival of Science " ... As a scientist, Robert May is not easily pigeonholed - he's been a physicist, an applied mathematician, and a zoologist. Before becoming President of the RS in 2000, Lord May spent 5 years as Chief Scientific Adviser to the Government, and so has been involved in some of the big scientific issues of recent times, especially BSE, the threat from biological weapons and GM foods.For tickets and prices contact the Cheltenham Festival of Science box-office on 01242 227 979
"
See Royal Society website
May 12 ~ "The following issues have to be solved before emergency
vaccination can be introduced. With significant effort by
DEFRA, this should be possible by the end of 2003." Royal Society Inquiry July 2002
We feel continuing concern that the recommendations of the Royal Society Inquiry Report into Infectious Disease in Livestock ( July 2002) are not being implemented. We may be wrong and would welcome informed information:
"Rapid diagnosis, particularly before clinical signs appear, would limit the size of any epidemic and improve strategic deployment of resources. Such diagnostic methods must be linked by modern telecommunications to central headquarters.
.......
A prerequisite is a central database incorporating improved data on farms, the location of animals, animal movements, and the characteristics of the diseases, together with arrangements to input disease control data in a timely and assured way during an outbreak.
More work is required to refine the existing models and to strengthen their capacity to inform policy, which in turn requires full access by researchers to this database and to the data on previous outbreaks.
A national strategy for animal disease research should be developed. The overall costs of animal diseases to the UK over the past 15 years may well have exceeded £15 billion ...."
The end of 2003 is approaching rapidly. The Royal Society recommendations are clear. A workable policy on emergency vaccination should be in place by Summer/Autumn of this year. Where is it?
May 12 ~ Ministers talk of enhancing consumer choice but are proposing a policy that offers no choice.
In a story that once again reveals the extent to which "experts" disagree wildly with each other, we read "leaked cabinet papers have revealed a secret plan to allow fluoride to be added to all drinking water in England and Wales... (See front page of Sunday Times)
"Tony Blair is personally backing the plan to extend fluoridation...Ministers argue the measures are justified because children in fluoridated areas have much less tooth decay."
However a well-referenced article at the end of last month from the Environmental News Network reveals that fluoridation is being stopped in Switzerland: "over forty years of water fluoridation
failed to reduce tooth decay in Basel, where children's cavity
rates increased from 1996 - 2001, according to a Swiss Government Report(pdf file).
Basel, the only Swiss city adding fluoride to water supplies, halted
fluoridation on April 9, 2003, on the advice of their governmental Health
and Social Commission.... . "Fluoridation proponents refused invitations to lecture at an upcoming U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Science Forum," says lawyer Paul Beeber, President, New York State Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation. "It's embarrassing for government officials who promote fluoridation to admit it is ineffective, thereby, risking their jobs and credibility " ...."
The Sunday Times Leader remarks: "...Ministers talk of enhancing consumer choice but are proposing a policy that offers no choice. Evian and Malvern must be rubbing their hands. If the government goes ahead with the plan, the main beneficiaries will be the bottled water companies."
May 10/11 ~ ....a monopoly on the word "organic" itself, making it illegal for independent producers to adopt higher standards and create their own labels.
In the light of news that DEFRA is now inviting comments "on the future format and content of the standards for
organic food production in the UK, following the planned replacement of the
UK Register of Organic Food Standards (UKROFS) with new arrangements for
implementing the European Community requirements for organic food and farming " http://www.defra.gov.uk/corporate/consult/organic-compend/index.htm we are reminded of Michael Manville's 2001 article: "Welcome to the Spin Machine"
Extract: "...In 1998, on the day before Thanksgiving (one of the year's slowest news days), the U.S. Department of Agriculture released draft standards for organic quality. The standards were part of an effort begun eight years before, when Congress had passed the National Organic Foods Production Act, officially recognizing organic agriculture. As part of that law, the USDA had appointed a National Organic Advisory Panel to determine what the government definition of "organic" food should be.
The definition, as it turned out, would be broad. Observers, and particularly organic growers, were stunned to find that the USDA had almost completely ignored the recommendations of its own panel, and instead drafted guidelines that eviscerated the existing benchmarks for organic quality. Under the proposed measures, genetically altered foods, irradiated food, foods grown on fields fertilized by sewage sludge, crops doused in pesticide, and beef from taken from perpetually confined farm animals could all be called organic. Also dropped into the guidelines was a clause that gave the USDA a monopoly on the word "organic" itself, making it illegal for independent producers to adopt higher standards and create their own labels."
( In February 2003 Congress voted further to weaken US organic food standards. See Sacremento Bee)
May 10 ~ "Not only are intensive systems cruel, but they make herds vulnerable to the rapid spread of devastating diseases..
.. such as foot and mouth and swine fever. But abolishing them costs money, which is one of the reasons British farmers' pork is more expensive.
Elsewhere in East Anglia, a pig farmer agreed to take us into one of his intensive pig units, on the condition of anonymity. Walking down the corridor of Stalag 13, as he cheerfully called it, brushing under the filth hanging from the low ceilings and holding our noses against the stench of ammonia, we peered through inspection hatches into darkened pens where pigs were crowded on to slatted floors. The slats cause bruising and foot injuries, the pigs are bred to grow so fast and large they frequently suffer from joint and leg problems, and one in 10 births has to be assisted because confined sows cannot exercise their uterine muscles. ..." Extract from the Sausage factory (external link) section of the first part of the Guardian's three-week series investigating " the great food scandal. Our team of reporters and experts has looked beneath the labels and exposed the contents of our food." See http://www.guardian.co.uk/food/focus/0,13290,951051,00.html
May 9/10 ~ Suspected case of AI (avian flu) has been found on a farm in Schwalmtal, in the German state of NordRhein Westfalen (NRW).
See Pig Health.com(external) for details of the new outbreak. The first investigations of the veterinary authorities lead to a fear that AI is now also in Germany. The farm has 32,000 (thirty two thousand) broiler chickens, all of which will be destroyed. Intensive farming and "slaughter to cure". Miserable.
May 9/10 ~ "an exemption to the six day
standstill for individually identified cattle, sheep and goats attending
shows.
The exemption will come into force on 30 May. ..." See Press Release from DEFRA. Pigs remain subject to a 20 day rule.
May 9/10 ~ EU electronic tagging study: " The IDEA project has demonstrated that a substantial improvement can be
reached for livestock identification by using electronic identifiers;"
The IDEA Project: IDentification Electronique des Animaux
was a large study ( 1,000,000 animals) comparing different ID methods, with emphasis on the feasibility of electronic tagging.
You can find the complete report at
http://idea.jrc.it
From its "conclusive statement of IDEA project"
It is the proper time to introduce electronic identification for cattle, buffalo,
sheep and goats in view of establishing an improved livestock identification,
registration and management system in the EU.
This statement needs to be accompanied by a number of conditions to be fulfilled.
These conditions may be summarised as follows:-
- A clear and unambiguous legislation needs to be available, which takes into account the
capabilities and constraints of the new technology.
-
- Guidelines and technical specifications need to be available at EU level for selecting appropriate
identifiers and readers.
-
- Implementation guidelines need to be available at EU level for the application of identifiers, their
reading, recovery and disposal.
-
- Common glossary, data dictionary and communication standards need to be available for the data
management of livestock related information.
-
- The application and reading of identifiers needs to be performed according to the conditions and
taking into account the constraints described in the IDEA project.
-
- A proper technical co-operation needs to be established between EU Member States and between
the Member States and the European Commission for the preparation and periodic review and
improvement of the above-mentioned accompanying measures.
See also warmwell entry for May 6
May 9/10 ~ " to proceed from a large-scale project, comprising nearly one million animals in six EU
countries towards approximately 200 million animals in 15 EU countries."
"Nine of these countries (including UK) did
not participate to the IDEA project and will have to gain the experience in this area. An important
effort will have to be dedicated to the transfer of know-how to these countries and in a later stage also
to the Enlargement Countries.
The introduction of an electronic identification system is a major effort for the individual
Member States and the Community as a whole, involving many Authorities and operators. A very
important harmonisation effort will be required as has been pointed out in the previous sections
If a Council decision is made to proceed with the full implementation of an electronic identification
system, it will be necessary to elaborate with the Member States an "Implementation master plan",
which elaborates the details of each of the steps to be made, their time schedule, responsibilities and
cost.
In the meantime it is highly recommended that no major implementation exercises are conducted in
Member States to avoid future difficulties to adapt to final decisions made at Council level for the
implementation of the improved identification system."
May 9 ~"We
are shocked by this bizarre move to recommend Ministers adopt an insane
definition of what is waste and what is food."
DEFRA, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs is planning to
recommend a move to Ministers which will mean fresh or frozen meat can no
longer be thrown in the bin but must be incinerated to prevent the spread of
disease.
Ministers must decide within the next few weeks whether uncooked meats
should be classed as food or as animal by-products.
The proposals form part of the EU Animal By-Products regulation, which has
also left farmers facing huge costs to dispose of dead livestock which can
no longer be buried or burned on farmland.....
Bill Moynes, director general of the British Retail Consortium, said:
'If the Government decides that meat and fish are not food, it will not only
add a huge, unnecessary cost to British food retailers, but will be proof
that Defra's bureaucrats have no understanding of the food sector they are
meant to oversee.' (Seafood.com)
May 9 ~ "the lack of affordable homes was now 'the single greatest threat to a
viable countryside' "
says Richard Burge, chief executive of the Countryside Alliance
"The Countryside Agency's new survey shows how badly townspeople want the
'look' of the countryside protected - but this cannot happen if affordable
housing is not available for those who act as the landscape's
custodians."
(Nine out of 10 people want the countryside to be preserved "the way it
is now", according to a new survey published by the Countryside Agency
on Wednesday as part of the agency's annual "State of the
Countryside" report. It found that 60 per cent of people questioned believed
preservation of the countryside to be "very important", with a further
30 per cent rating it as "fairly important". However, only 17% of people thought farms and farmers were important.
)
See also Services Improving - And also in decline (Western Morning News)
May 8 ~ Protest as Lidl tries to cut milk price
http://www.thescotsman.co.uk/business.cfm?id=524802003"An attempt by hard-line discount retailer Lidl to cut the price it pays for
milk led to several hundred dairy farmers picketing its six UK distribution
centres on Tuesday night....'Cutting our price by 1.3p a litre will knock
more than £10,000 a year off the average dairy farmer's annual return, but
passed on to the consumer it would take about 6p off a week's shopping.'
."
May 8 ~ The primary vCJD epidemic in the known susceptible genotype in the UK appears to be in decline
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/3/4/abstract Azra C Ghani , Christl A Donnelly , Neil M Ferguson and Roy M Anderson
"....Our results show a substantial decrease in the uncertainty of the future course of the primary epidemic in the susceptible genotype (MM-homozygous at codon 129 of the prion protein gene), with a best estimate of 40 future deaths (95% prediction interval 9-540) based on fitting to the vCJD case data alone. Additional fitting of the appendix data increases these estimates (best estimate 100, 95% prediction interval 10-2,600) but remains lower than previous projections. ..."
How many restrictive laws, regulations and directives (rules on fallen stock, waste disposal, tagging, abattoir rules etc. etc) use as their rationale the fear of vCJD - a fear based on the former predictions ( and initial estimates were as high as 100,000 )
of the Imperial College team? When is independent research into TSEs going to be properly funded? The pharmaceutical industry in particular seems determined that the source of BSE and CJD should be assumed to be that favoured by current SEAC thinking. A spotlight on chemicals could expose the role of insecticides in other neurodegenerative diseases. That might lead to claims which would dwarf those from BSE and CJD litigants.
May 7 ~ Two recent letters published in the Veterinary Record
"If the contiguous cull was an expensive mistake, this fact is too important to be buried with bad news."
From a letter in the April 12th 2003 edition of the Veterinary Record from Professor Bob Michell. Extract: "...the decline of the foot and mouth disease (FMD) epidemic in 2001 began too soon to be credibly attributed to the introduction of the 'contiguous cull' based on the chronology established by the National Audit Office inquiry. This indicated that the downturn preceded the announcement of the contiguous cull by at least eight days. More detailed analysis, taking proper account of regional diversity and disclosed to the recent meeting of the Society for Veterinary Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine (SVEPM) in Warwick (Honhold and others 2003, Taylor and others2003), reveals that, in Cumbria, the contiguous cull did not begin until after the epidemic was under control ....
The outbreak of FMD in 2001 required the biggest logistical operation in the UK since the Second World War and created the gravest crisis in the rural economy, together with the greatest suffering among people and animals in the rural communities for over 30 years. If the contiguous cull was an expensive mistake, this fact is too important to be buried with bad news. It is essential that our profession, through its political institutions, ensures that this matter is now properly and independently investigated on an appropriate regional basis; the RCVS initiative to encourage the Select Committee to oversee this task deserves our most energetic support. FMD was a catastrophe and it is our clear duty to see that it is analysed with the same thoroughness and political impartiality as other disasters....." (letter in full)
"Support should therefore be directed to.... the intelligent use of the highly potent vaccines now available
The Vet Record of 22nd March 2003 contained an important letter from Professor Fred Brown and Dr Noel Mowat. Extract:"...while international policy is not directed to universal vaccination, it seems unreasonable to ask anyone to work towards a product which may never be used. Support should therefore be directed to enhancing and improving modern methods of control in emergency situations including zoosanitary measures and the intelligent use of the highly potent vaccines now available." (letter in full)
May 6 ~".. the proposals in their present
form would be all but impossible to comply with"
Tagging debate goes back to EC (external link)
Dan Buglass in today's Scotsman writes:
"The battle to convince the European Commission that its proposals that all
sheep should be double-tagged and records of individual movements should be
recorded will continue for many months.
However, there is a growing recognition that the proposals in their present
form would be all but impossible to comply with on large-scale farms."
Mr Buglass might have added that it is not just the "large-scale" farms who would find it a problem. The small farmers who care for the welfare of their sheep would also find it impossibly cumbersome and unnecessary.
See also yesterday's note from Brussels "Electronic tagging to track European livestock" (external)
"..The European Commission presented today, in a farm at
Monterotondo, near Rome, the results of the IDEA
(Electronic IDentification of Animals) project..... IDEA clearly demonstrated that a substantial
improvement in traceability can be achieved by using
electronic identification of livestock, and that there
is no technical impediment to its introduction for
cattle, buffaloes, sheep and goats. The results
underpin recommendations covering target species and
breeds under a broad spectrum of conditions: intensive
and extensive rearing, intra- and extra-European
transport, different slaughtering techniques, and
environmental extremes in the north and south of the
EU.
... . If necessary, the Commission will submit a
report to the Council by the end of 2005, based on the
experience of implementing electronic identification. "
May 6 ~"The following issues have to be solved before emergency
vaccination can be introduced. With significant effort by
DEFRA, this should be possible by the end of 2003." Royal Society
In the Royal Society Inquiry Report into Infectious Disease in Livestock ( July 2002) we read:
- "... The policy should be vaccinate-to-live. This will
necessitate clear acceptance by all concerned that
meat and meat products from vaccinated animals may
enter the food chain normally.
- Validation of the marker vaccines to be employed and
the tests to distinguish between vaccinated and
vaccinated-infected animals, and clear rules for
defining the post-surveillance strategy for monitoring
herds and flocks.
- Remaining trade implications both within and beyond
the EU.
- The precise vaccination strategy to be employed,
including the threshold criteria for its implementation
when an outbreak occurs and the relative focus upon
geographical regions, high risk farms or species to be
vaccinated. Modelling should play a key role here.
- Practical issues concerned with storing vaccines,
manufacturing extra vaccine stocks, delivery of
vaccines and the training of vaccination teams.
Hence, we believe that the UK should now be planning to
use emergency vaccination as an important component
of its control strategy for FMD....."
The end of 2003 is approaching rapidly. How far have these issues been addressed? How far are other Royal Society recommendations being followed up?
May 3 ~ It is clear that the insurance industry is not in a position to provide for the losses incurred through disease outbreaks"
FWi report
"The government has backed away from its plan to force farmers insure against disease outbreaks.
.....
"Many livestock farmers will be relieved that DEFRA doesn't appear to be going down the insurance route anymore."....
The DEFRA statement also covered the wider issue of compensation.
It makes plain that it wants to simplify the current system of compensation payments, but ruled out cuts in compensation as part of the animal health strategy.
"Compensation will continue to be paid for all notifiable diseases.. "
May 2 ~ two letters from the "Ministry"
Comment from National Pig Association Forum
http://www.npa-uk.net/
"...Finally a pig farmer client of mine rang to say he had recently received
two letters from the "Ministry". One was to give him approval for his farm
diversification scheme to have a "green burial" site on his farm for people
to lay their grannies and other loved ones to rest and plant an appropriate
tree above their 6ft plot and the second letter was to say that all on farm
disposal of former livestock was to be banned. It's a funny old world."
May 2 ~" it must be remembered that to label
British food as British is a breach of the criminal law"
Thanks yet again to Muckspreader(new window) in this week's Private Eye, who points out that "This is because
of those Alice in Kafka-land rules from the EU which make it illegal to label
food with its country of origin....All that matters is where the food was processed and
packaged. If you import your frozen chicken from Thailand, so long as it
is processed and packed in Briticism it is legal to call it "British"....The rules are so crazy that countless efforts have been
made to get round them, and to pass on to shoppers the information many of them
would like to know.. One of the most pitiful was the NFU's "Little Red
Tractor" scheme, intended to kid shoppers into thinking that any food bearing
this label came from a British farm. in fact, as even the NFU was at last
forced to admit, it mean nothing of the kind."
And Muckpreader goes on to explain what happened to Stephen O'Brien's Food Labelling Bill - "..in the end he was slapped down by the minster, Joyce Quin,
who pointed out that his bill was an offence against EU law." However, the article concludes,
"It is still possible to go down to the
local farm shop, safe in the knowledge that its produce is home-grown, because
that is the point of farm shops. And so far Brussels hasn't found a way to
ban them." Private Eye article in full
May 2 ~ Another fine costly mess ...
"as astonishing as it is unnecessary" ... "last desperate act of IT-illiterate top (civil servants) drowning in a whirlpool of technology". The sorry saga of DEFRA's need for a complete IT overhaul, referred to by the
EFRA Committee on April 9th and many times on this website, is also the subject of an article in Private Eye this week."...Earlier this month Defra invited companies to
tender for the £1.4 bn deal. The contract, due to start
next summer, would include looking after the livestock and land registers,
including disease monitoring, which were so vital in attempting to bring the
foot and mouth epidemic under control.
The environment, food and rural affairs select committee
has previously strongly criticised the department's "woeful approach"
to IT, but rather than try to improve, it seems
Defra thinks it can buy a solution.
Previous experience (such as the Inland Revenue's
troubled contract with EDS and IT Net's disastrous management of housing
benefit and council tax systems in Hackney) suggest it won't be
easy."
May 1 ~Ban on livestock burials on farms "As regulations go, this is one of the barmiest," said Anthony Gibson,
South West director of the National Farmers' Union. "I suppose one can
just about understand the desire of the food safety bureaucrats to
third-party verification of the disposal of every single bovine carcass.
But sheep or pigs? What conceivable risk can there be in burying their
carcasses?"
But the NFU has urged all livestock, pig and poultry producers to
indicate their support of Defra's fallen stock subscription scheme by
the May 6 deadline...." Western Morning News
May 1 ~"I see striking similarities with the methods of "management" of news during the FMD epidemic, when the majority of the public was lulled into believing that the epidemic was virtually over in time for the Election."
We have received this essay, written in response to the article yesterday by Jonathan Freedland on Iraq. (Mr Freedland's article)
Extract from essay: Burying the truth
"... Firstly there were the declarations based upon Professor Anderson's computer predictions that the daily outbreak total would finally hit zero on 7 June, the Election date.... Secondly, Tony Blair started talking about public services again. ..
...In the week after the election 80,000 animals were killed. The following week the total was 93,000."
The slaughter continued through the summer months with a vengeance,... While Ministers basked in sunshine, tens of thousands of hefted sheep were being wiped out, simply because they were antibody positive.
...
...So the public were fooled, and at least 11 million animals were killed. ... Furthermore, much of the slaughter and burial was done by stealth at night. .... "techniques of persuasion" more akin to those of a police state.... the upsurge of massive distrust and anger of the rural population with a government perceived to be arrogantly anti rural and utterly out of tune with the countryside. ..." (More)
May 1 ~ Bird flu and vaccination
Pro-Med site "Following the decision of the Dutch authorities to permit the
vaccination of susceptible animals in zoos, a debate on possible
vaccination of other animals seems inevitable. The Belgian daily Het
Nieuwsblad of 29 Apr 2003 presents the story of the Vermeiren family
from Loenhout, who had to cull their entire stock of ostriches -- 144
birds -- because of their proximity to an infected chicken farm. Such
birds, as well as "hobby" birds holdings, might be the next to demand
vaccination."
"The vaccines, officially allowed in the decree of 22 Apr 2003 by the
Dutch Ministry of Agriculture for restricted use in zoos, are Nobilis
Influenza H7 (external link) manufactured by Intervet (Boxmeer) and Fluvac H7,
manufactured by Merial B.V. (Amstelveen). Both include a
heterologous neuraminidase (not N7), which enables their use as
natural "marker" vaccines or DIVA (differentiating infected from
vaccinated animals)..."
Some degree of commercial vaccination against avian flu appears to have been already approved in the US. According to an Associated Press report in the (Stamford Advocate) "Nearly 3 million birds in Connecticut at Kofkoff Egg Farms' facilities in Bozrah and Lebanon were sicked by avian influenza earlier this year. Federal regulators have approved plans to vaccinate chickens at Kofkoff, Connecticut's largest egg producer."
May 1 ~ "the current scientific expertise allows us to believe that at
present the virus strain of avian influenza in the Netherlands does not
represent a risk to the general public"
said EU Commissioner David Byrne "Two years ago, the European Commission supported the Dutch government in
its approach and partially compensated affected farmers for the loss of
their animals. We will do this now again, but of course the EU can only
contribute in part to the final bill."
Under the Veterinary Fund, the Commission contributes about 50 per cent of
the expenditure incurred by the Member States for the culling and
destruction of poultry in infected and possibly infected farms. It also
covers certain other costs such as cleansing and disinfection of farms.
According to the figures available at present, the costs for the EU will
probably amount to at least Euro 70 million..." See Animalnet (external link)
"Since the
beginning of the epidemic, 243 holdings have been found definitely
infected, of which 19 were diagnosed on non-commercial ("hobby")
holdings. 21.0 million AI-susceptible animals have been culled so far."
See also PigHealth.org's page "Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Virus HPAI H7N7
Spreads From Poultry to People and Pigs"
May 1 ~
"Chaos erupts as burial of farm stock is banned"
Charles Clover in today's Telegraph (external link)
"Chaos surrounds a ban, due to come into force today, on the burial of fallen livestock with the Government admitting that it will be August before it has a working scheme to take away animals that die on the farm.
......
Defra has said it will exercise a "light touch" but has stopped short of saying it will not implement the regulation, for fear of prosecution by the European Commission.
Letters have been sent out by Defra to 111,000 livestock farmers about the setting up of a voluntary subscription scheme after eleventh-hour talks between the Government and farmers last week.
....."
May 1 ~ Disposal of Fallen Stock: the voluntary subscription scheme
On April 25 we published the reaction of one very angry "stockholder" : "Any fallen livestock on this croft will be recycled naturally - not
added to the pollution of this planet by unnecessary transport [use of
fuel] or rendering [more misuse of fuel].
How you can call yourselves 'Department of the Environment' I do not know -
..."
Yesterday this, perhaps relevant, story arrived in the warmwell Inbox ..." A bus load of politicians were driving down a country road, when the bus
ran off the road and crashed into a tree in an old farmer's field. The
old farmer, after seeing what happened, went over to investigate. A few
days later, the police went to look for the missing politicians, saw the
crashed bus, and asked the farmer where they had all gone.
"I buried
them all out back," said the farmer.
"Were they ALL dead?" asked the
police.
The farmer replied, "Well, some of them said they weren't, but
you know how politicians lie."
Human corpses - unlike fallen stock - are not considered to pose a threat when buried. No finger of blame therefore could possibly be levelled at the farmer.
May 1 ~
"Following the outbreak of SARS, one thing was certain: Professor Roy Anderson of Imperial College would soon be hitting the headlines"
Private Eye
Extract: "And so it came to pass. While the World Health Organisation was being severely criticised by the Canadian government and others for "over-reacting", it found welcome backing last weekend from a report by Anderson which claimed that Sars was twice as deadly as previously thought. "We have not seen the report so we could not comment," a WHO spokesman said, "except to say that this is a top-class professional and any figure he commits himself to is likely to be as close as possible to accurate." ....
... Two years ago it was Roy Anderson who created the computer model used by the government to claim that the number of FMD cases would fall to zero by 7 June 2001. ... .
Back in 1987 Anderson's mathematical talents again proved useful to a politician's election prospects. He was invited by Norway's Prime minister Gro Harlem Brundtland to help produce an "independent assessment" of how many minke whales Norwegians could sustainably kill each year. The International Whaling Commission had introduced a moratorium on commercial minke whaling, which Brundtland feared would lose her support in the northern whaling constituencies. She hoped that a report by a four-man committee of experts, including Anderson, would persuade the IWC to ease the ban.
Lo and behold, the committee came up with exactly the same figure - 200 whales - which the whalers thought they needed to make a profit. But then a mathematical biologist on the IWC's scientific committee went through the algebra and found "fundamental flaws in the methodology": Anderson and his chums had achieved the result Brundtland wanted only by creating unreal (indeed "impossible" ) parameters.
The report was duly rubbished by the experts, just as Anderson's foot-and-mouth model was two years ago. But politicians continue to admire him, including of course the former Norwegian PM. And where is Gro Harlem Brundtland now? By happy coincidence, she is director-general of the World Health Organisation."
April 30 ~ Relief at proposals by EU Agriculture Committee to force states to vaccinate rather than slaughter healthy livestock
The voice of sanity in the NFU, Anthony Gibson, called it " one of the most
bloody, tragic and disgraceful misjudgments made in the name of
science" but yesterday the contiguous cull policy was itself condemned and doomed to extinction. Even if progress is slow (the issue still has to go to full plenary in Strasbourg in June), sane and humane voices are changing the "slaughter to cure" mindset. In the 2001 foot and mouth crisis, hundreds of farmers, stockmen and pet owners were forced to have their healthy animals killed because of it. Although effective vaccines and rapid diagnosis test kits were available, political prevarication and misinformation prevented their use. Most of the killing and all of the intimidation suffered by rural communities during 2001 was wholly unjustifiable.
However, the EU Agriculture Committee voted yesterday to adopt a proposal from Dr Caroline Lucas, (the Vice-President of the EU Temporary Committee into FMD) demanding that emergency vaccination be considered "the first choice in case an outbreak of FMD is suspected or confirmed". Labour's proposals to weaken the Directive by making vaccination simply an option to consider were rejected by MEPs.
April 29 ~ "Euro-MPs Demand Compulsory Foot and Mouth Vaccination" - European Commission's FMD proposal
We have been sent this report (extract): "Euro-MPs have today backed Green proposals to force states to vaccinate rather than slaughter healthy livestock in any future outbreak of Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). Members of the Agriculture Committee voted to adopt a proposal tabled by Dr Lucas, demanding emergency vaccination be considered "*the first choice in case an outbreak of FMD is suspected or confirmed". Speaking in Brussels after the vote, she said: "More than 11 million healthy animals were needlessly slaughtered during the 2001 epidemic thanks to the Government's decision to prioritise protecting the UK's agricultural export market over making a serious attempt to halt the spread of the disease. The European Parliament's inquiry into the outbreak blamed the contiguous cull policy for bringing financial ruin to much of rural England and recommended vaccination should be the first response in any future outbreak. Today's vote takes us one step closer to ensuring that this happens.
......"
The proposed directive will now be passed to the full European Parliament for debate on June 3."
April 28 ~"... Tony Blair is unhappy about the public perception that the Government does not care for the countryside.."
The Times today on Lord Haskins' internal review of DEFRA: "...One of Lord Haskins's main findings is that officials spend too much time devising ways to implement policy when they have no understanding and little knowledge of local mechanics such as the reality of life as a farmer or rural businessman.
He believes that core London staff should stick to policy formulation and leave implementation to experts in the regions. Officials based in the regions should instead seek out the views of farmers or businessmen before agreeing to an implementation plan. .....One government source said: "There are a lot of worried people in Defra. It's sinking in that the Haskins review is much bigger than previously thought. A lot of people are trying to second-guess and some might decide to quit altogether."
Lord Haskins is particularly scathing about the department's interpretation of European directives and cannot understand why implementation is not discussed with relevant experts...."
April 28 ~ "... the genetic heritage on which farming depends..."
The European Commission is failing to protect Europe against determined pressure from the United States to accept genetically modified organisms, preferably without any rules on their traceability or labelling. The new warmwell page on GMOs begins with an article from Le Monde diplomatique this month by Susan George "....
It is now known that pollen is regularly passed between GMOs and cultivated or wild plants. Depending on the crop and the type of pollination, the pollution may spread far beyond the official limits laid down to protect neighbouring fields. And other species, as well as closely related ones, are contaminated. If GMO field trials become widespread, we know that biological (i.e.organic) farming will soon become impossible, an economically promising path for development will be closed, and farmers will no longer be free to choose.
..."
More
April 27 ~ Defra strikes again - Booker's Notebook
(Sunday Telegraph) "There seems to be no end to the damage Lord Whitty and his colleagues at the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs are determined to inflict on British agriculture. Next Thursday, the organisers of our leading agricultural shows will meet Whitty over the chaos into which they have been plunged by his new "animal health rules" by which, once animals have been moved, they cannot be moved again for six days.
Many shows take place only a day or two apart, so exhibitors cannot now move their animals from one show to another. Entries for most shows this summer are down by two thirds or more, threatening financial disaster.
The ban's claimed purpose is to prevent the spread of disease, although at a recent meeting with show organisers, a senior Defra vet conceded the health risks posed by shows were negligible. Lord Whitty's only response has been to suggest that the organisers should rearrange their dates, clearly oblivious to the fact that shows take months to set up, and that the dates have been traditionally fixed, in some cases for centuries.
Lord Whitty shows a similar disregard for reality over the EU's insane ban on burying dead farm animals, also due to come into force this Thursday, although no system is in place whereby the farmers can pay for millions of animals a year to be taken away to be "rendered". Whitty was asked in the Lords why the EU was banning the burial of animals when it has not banned burying human beings. He said that human graves are treated with quicklime. Perhaps he has never looked into one."
April 26 ~"The Professor, considered one of the leading authorities on infectious diseases..."
say the latest headlines today about Professor Roy Anderson's pronouncements on SARS and his advice that there should be a diagnostic test. "Considered one of the leading authorities"? Perhaps he is unlikely to be so considered by anyone who has any knowledge at all of the modelling of the FMD crisis for which he was responsible nor, we would guess, anyone who heard the professor's evidence to the European Temporary Committee when he was trying to justify the millions of unnecessary deaths. On the contrary, Professor Anderson and his coterie is notorious in some quarters. However, he continues to be listened to by the media and government, perhaps because an acknowledgement of his errors of judgement by them would rebound on those in the highest positions.
In 2001 the Government wanted an aggressive
approach from their modellers. (Reasons for this were discussed in the Private Eye report.) Inevitably this meant that for those with no
veterinary training, it was easiest to kill the host as a means of ensuring
that there was no place for the virus. One does not need to be a
mathematical modeller to know that this will stop spread of the disease. The
evidence against the effectiveness of the Ferguson/Anderson and Woolhouse
modelling is now being published, extracts from which will appear on this website as soon as possible.
April 26 ~ Comparisons of SARS and FMD are relevant
One could be almost forgiven for imagining that
there is a divine presence determined to teach some of our
less than admirable scientists and politicians a lesson. Both SARS and FMD are highly contagious diseases, both
are typified by viruses that can mutate (If SARS is caused by a
coronavirus, it will mutate even more rapidely than FMDV), both spread
rapidly via the host species. After that the similarities end - for
there is a worldwide collaborative effort to learn more of SARS - so the
coronavirus has already been sequenced, its rapid mutation rate has been
established and rapid diagnostic tests (an hour for some!) are being
trialled. There are no artificial blocks over laboratory
validation . In the case of SARS, but not alas FMD, the time of crisis makes validation in the field necesssary and
regarded as adequate. Realistically, however, effective vaccination for SARS (but not FMD) could
be a problem because of the uncertainty over whether a coronavirus is truly
the causal organism and the high mutation rate if it is. This is quite unlike the
situation with FMDV for which an effective vaccine is and has been available for many years.
April 25/26 ~ we are not taking or sharing the lead in areas such as viral infections
"...We are fortunate to have in Britain a major foundation, Wellcome, and other fine trusts, and several government departments all funding research, yet we are not taking or sharing the lead in areas such as viral infections or BSE...." Letter in the Times from Mr Geoffrey Lord
April 25/26 ~ little or no ability to respond actively and rapidly to a new problem.......
Letter from Dr Peter B. Baker
in today's Times
Sir, There is a third factor in addition to short-termism and underfunding (Comment, April 22) which affects the UK's ability to respond rapidly to the possiblility of a Sars epidemic.
In the 1970s, Lord Rothschild devised the "customer-contractor" priniciple, which targeted publicly funded research primarily in government-owned laboratories. The aim, admirable in itself, was to cut down on waste and the methodology was that the customer (eg. a government department) identified the work to be done, the contractor did it and the customer paid. The immediate result was wthat many excellent research programmes, primarily but not solely in the agricultural and food sectors, came to an abrupt end.
The long-term result was much more insidious: many leading researchers and their teams found that there was no thinking time and, in relation to BSE, FMD and now Sars, little or no ability to respond actively and rapidly to a new problem........
More
April 25/26 ~ Increasingly, scientific research is paid for by private enterprise, which in practice means big business.
"Science, said Rothschild, should be promoted in so far as it generates high technologies of the kind that can be seen to produce profit. Many, at the time and since, thought this approach was crass; that scholarship should as far as possible be independent of short-term gain. But Rothschild appealed to Edward Heath's government and to all governments since--especially Tony Blair's -- and so the loop was established. Increasingly, scientific research is paid for by private enterprise, which in practice means big business. Big business promotes the kind of scientific research that will provide the kind of technologies that can underpin the most profitable modus operandi. The most profitable modus operandi in agriculture is industrialisation...." This extract is from an article by Colin Tudge published in January 2001 in the New Statesman - and worth re-reading in the light of Dr Baker's comments above, as are these comments from Dr Alan Dickinson, a witness to the BSE Inquiry
April 25 ~ SARS, viruses in poultry and pigs, and no lessons learned from Foot and Mouth
A 57-year-old veterinarian who visited a poultry farm affected by the (H7N7) strain of avian influenza died on 17 April of acute respiratory distress syndrome in the Netherlands. See docguide.com (external link)
While the headlines are full of SARS, few newspapers it seems have so far noted the parallels between SARS and current avian and porcine viruses. One concern about these animal diseases is the fear that they can mutate into new human influenza strains - such as SARS. ( See also article from Pig Health.com Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Virus HPAI H7N7
Spreads From Poultry to People and Pigs
- external link)
An excerpt from the current report of the relevant USAHA committee meeting into avian flu (Transmissible Diseases of Poultry Committee) (external link) under the heading "Lessons Learned" :" Transport of daily mortality to rendering plants must be re-examined to minimize this risk in the spread of disease. The spread of this virus was primarily via the movement of people and equipment, with airborne spread playing little to no role. Environmental concerns were particularly critical in responding to such an outbreak.
The availability of rapid, accurate diagnostic testing physically located in close proximity to the outbreak is essential. Any additional delay due to shipping samples, even overnight, has a significant negative impact on the ability to manage the outbreak quickly and effectively....Recommendation 3)
Vaccine should be available when needed......
Recommendation 4)
USDA should fund AI vaccine research. "
The lapse of time between suspicion and diagnosis continues to be the real concern with emerging viruses - and an urgent need for real-time testing, vaccine availability and research is very evident in this USAHA report. In contrast, the UK is still, even now, unprepared for virus outbreaks. The continuing reluctance to use the readily available effective vaccines or rapid diagnosis tests for FMD seems inexplicable. "Culling" is still the preferred sledgehammer response. While indiscriminate killing could be covered up or rationalised when the victims were farm animals, when they are human beings, culling the host as a way of removing virus is a response that can hardly be recommended.
April 25 ~ What is genuinely alarming about SARS is that two years after foot and mouth, the UK is still unable to achieve rapid diagnosis and has ignored recommendations made by the Royal Society.
There is no need to labour the point. When we hear Toronto's mayor, Mel Lastman, wondering what the World Health Organisation is up to with its "precautionary principle" measures that will result in a massive cut in growth, his words vividly bring back the criticisms levelled at the FMD policies in the UK. Mr Lastman deplores WHO precautions that do nothing except whip up panic and cause enormous economic losses. Those making centralised draconian decisions, he suggests, have insufficient knowledge of the local situation.
In all the hype and fabricated fear over SARS, what is genuinely alarming is that two years after foot and mouth, the UK, while very skilled in imposing restrictions from above, is still unable to implement rapid diagnosis on the ground and has ignored the recommendations of the Royal Society
Incompetence, self-regarding panic and hidden economic agendas lay behind the unnecessary killing, the fear and the heartbreak and the little naziism of FMD 2001. Since there was no public inquiry in spite of appeals from many eminent sources, the so-called independent inquiries were unable to do more than make recommendations. In reality, few lessons have been learned.
April 25 ~ "...fear, the disease that began to spread around the time of the end of the Cold War, was catalysed by the events of 11 September, and is currently focused on the SARS outbreak in Asia."
As an antidote to stories such as the "worst case scenario" story in yesterday's Guardian, we are grateful to the spiked-on-line.co.uk articles here pointing out that "The number of reported cases remains a tiny fraction of the populations of the countries affected. Even in Hong Kong, the most disproportionately affected area, the 1434 reported cases represent just 0.02 percent of the people living there. As a comparison, in the year 2000 there were 7578 cases of tuberculosis in Hong Kong. So while SARS in Hong Kong is a significant new strain on health services, it not out of proportion to other, existing infections.
There is even less reason for general alarm elsewhere in the world.......SARS does, however, appear to have damaged economies. Travellers face quarantine procedures at airports, as do many private school children returning from the worst affected areas. Governments have taken draconian steps to deal with anyone who refuses to cooperate with containment measures. While the health risk of SARS appears largely under control, the consequences of the panic could run and run..."
April 25 ~ One furious crofter's reaction to "New Rules on Disposal of Fallen Stock from 1 May 2003"
complete with card to fill in and return to say whether you are
interested in joining a subscription scheme.
The crofter writes, "At the moment we in this area have a derogation to continue to bury, but
I'm sure that will change in the near future.
For a smallholding the subscription is proposed at £50 a year, otherwise
disposal charges as follows:
£90 per cow, £15 per sheep, £12.50 per pig and wait for it....£0.65 per
chicken.
I am just so angry. As our animals go down in value, so some jumped up
agency wants yet more money from us. Money for living, money for dying.
Well I have filled in my card...written in anger and maybe not too well
worded....will anyone join me in expressing their feelings?
"Any fallen livestock on this croft will be recycled naturally - not
added to the pollution of this planet by unnecessary transport [use of
fuel] or rendering [more misuse of fuel].
How you can call yourselves 'Department of the Environment' I do not know -
more like 'damage to environment'
Signed/numbered.....one extremely angry 'stakeholder'.
April 24 ~ "...the Government has spent millions unnecessarily in slaughtering cattle and banning certain categories of meat."
Magnus Linklater's article in today's Times deplores the fact thatProfessor Alan Ebringer has been refused any further funding by DEFRA.
"alternative hypotheses should always be tested to the limit. That is the way science advances"...but not in this country. As Mr Linklater says, Prof Ebringer "has suggested that there is no link between the cattle disease BSE and new variant CJD, which attacks human beings. He believes the Government has spent millions unnecessarily in slaughtering cattle and banning certain categories of meat.
There has been opposition to his work from conventional scientists, who make up the majority of the Government-backed committee that vets all research applications... he will be closing his King's College laboratory and winding up his experiments. ... he has decided to retire from science altogether."
Last July during the Lords debate on the Animal Health Bill (report stage - opens in new window), The Countess of Mar said "No one seems to be considering any hypothesis other than the meat and bonemeal hypothesis. There are many of them around...". Warmwell's own article about Professor Ebringer's work explains in layman's terms the differences between Stanley Prusiner's "prion" theory and the autoimmune theory of Professor Ebringer, opposed by what Magnus Linklater calls the "conventional scientists, who make up the majority of the Government-backed committee that vets all research applications."
April 15 ~ Rapid diagnosis virus testing kits for SARS are being made available from today
Artus GmbH in Hamburg say that it has developed the test for the virus with the nearby Bernhard-Nocht-Institute (BNI) for Tropical Medicine in just two weeks and had begun distributing it free."German microbiologist Bernhard Fleischer, head of the BNI, said late last month that his institute had probably identified the virus causing SARS.
Scientists believe it is caused by a new coronavirus, a relative of one of the many viruses that cause the common cold. SARS is marked by a high fever, dry cough and other flu-like symptoms but can progress to pneumonia. ..."
See Reuters report (external link)
We hear that the WHO welcome the kits that have been produced by Artus. As with the rapid diagnosis kits for FMD and other pathogens that have been mentioned with more and more impatience on this website since 2001, presence of the virus can be detected within two hours whereas traditional tests for antibodies take more than 10 days. We have heard no mention of "validation" for this new test.
Rapid Diagnosis tests, portable real-time PCR tests that can identify all 7 serotypes of the FMDv within 2 hours, using samples taken by non-invasive procedures, are technically ready to use now. But DEFRA's Contingency plans ignore all this. I find the current document woefully inadequate and hope that significant changes in strategy based on recent developments in diagnostics and surveillance will be implemented, and further relevant research and trials will be supported and funded.
Mary Marshall's Comments on Defra's Foot and Mouth Disease Contingency Plan.
April 15 ~ Comment from farm on NFU PR campaign:
"We wouldn't wish to be churlish about the NFU et al's campaign to increase public awareness of farming's/farmers' contributions to UK food production/countryside etc. However, if you wanted to contrast the styles and emphasis of the NFU with other initiatives - it might be to consider that whilst the NFU is launching its PR campaign in the North East in a Tesco car-park, farm members and others could well be on the inside of the same supermarket slapping on farm's stickers highlighting the disparity between farm-gate/supermarket-shelf prices.
Robin Maynard said,
'Farm welcomes any campaign that truly builds mutual understanding and co-operation between producers and consumers.
However, rather than running yet another campaign intended to 'educate the public', the NFU's energies would be better directed at responding to the concerns of the significant body of people who are already well-educated about the causes behind, and sympathetic to, the plight of farmers in the UK and overseas.
These conscious, active consumers and citizens, are likely to be alienated by the NFU's apparently pro-agribusiness stance:
- pro-supermarkets like Tesco, who've just announced record profits, whilst farm-gate prices plummet;
- pro-the planting of GM crops, when the majority of the public and many farmers remain sceptical as to their benefits or need;
- and pro-the 'free' trade agenda of the WTO, which will drive farmers off the land around the world as they compete on markets rigged to suit the interests and profits of agribusiness.'
April 14 ~"... the Food Standards Agency will be forced to introduce draconian health measures to protect consumers"
"... If the test works, it will be used to test the brains of thousands of slaughtered sheepto see if BSE has accidentally infected the national flock. If it has, the Food Standards Agency will be forced to introduce draconian health measures to protect consumers...Professor Stanley Prusiner, of the University of California San Francisco, said the test was 100 per cent accurate and could identify animals with BSE long before they showed the first symptoms of disease..."
This article in the Independent recalls to us the interesting connection between BSE related scares and very lucrative research grants noted in Bookers Notebook last December. ".... Just why sporadic CJD, discovered in the 1920s, should suddenly be caused by BSE after 1990 but not before is not entirely clear. But never mind. Such a dramatic 400 percent boost in the number of "BSE deaths" was surely enough, suggested Collinge, to justify a massive new research programme based on screening everyone's tonsils. This was immediately supported by his American ally Prof.Stan Prusiner, who has developed a new test for CJD which he now suggests should be used on every person in Britain. This might be jolly healthy for Prof.Stan's bank account. But the fact remained that even 588 was still a little way short of those hundreds of thousands of deaths confidently predicted by the scientists only six years ago. And now comes the most alarming news of all: that vCJD cases are actually in sharp decline, just when, if the scientists' long-promised BSE-related epidemic was ever to materialise, they should be hurtling upwards. In other words, there might have been rather more useful ways to spend all that taxpayers' money. "
We remember too an article by Magnus Linklater the last time Prof Prusiner's test hit the headlines: "It is time to call a halt to the series of unprincipled scare stories that are being peddled about BSE and new variant CJD. The latest, which comes directly from the Nobel Prize-winning scientist, Stanley Prusiner, is the most outrageous of them all..." Yet we are still hearing about the draconian methods (killing all Britain's sheep) planned by the FSA to "protect consumers" if the elusive and much searched for link can be found.
April 14 ~ "...better informed choices about food .... appreciate why our beautiful landscape looks the way it does." Mark Pendleton of the CLA
Valerie Elliott's article in the Times today missed the chance to make a serious point well - that consumers are out of touch with the realities of food production, the difficulties faced by farmers in the UK and the consequences for our rural landscape.
We do not propose to reproduce here the strangely contemptuous headline chosen for this Times story.
April 12/14 ~ Panic at Defra over waste disposal rules
Booker's Notebook in the Sunday Telegraph "....
Margaret Beckett's Defra officials only recently began to wake up to the implications of the "animal by-products regulation"....
.
... Caught out by the speed with which the regulation was rushed through, Defra's officials have not even published it as British law. Instead, they expect every farmer and market stallholder to consult the Brussels website, before reading the attendant Defra regulation which informs them that any infringement can be punished with an unlimited fine or two years in prison.
.... for hundreds of thousands of smaller businesses, the new law will still come into effect on May 1, with results which for many will be catastrophic. Some of the worst hit, according to Richard Ali of the British Retailing Consortium, will be small butchers' shops or farmers' markets....
Faced with the likelihood that such astronomic costs will force small farmers and abattoirs out of business, Defra's only response is that it "is for the livestock industry, like other industries, to work out how best to deal with its waste problems and to pay their associated costs" - even though this "problem" is one created solely by Brussels and Defra themselves. This could not be better demonstrated than by the fact that "animal products" in domestic and most catering waste, such as from pubs and restaurants, are exempted. These will continue to be landfilled in huge quantities as if nothing had changed."
April 12/14 ~Disappearance of the Sutmoller, Barteling,
Olascoaga and Sumption paper from the internet
Within 24 hours of the Control and Eradication of FMD paper appearing on warmwell the volume 91 Issue 1 of Virus Research disappeared from the sciencedirect.com website. All the other issues remained - just that one had gone. There were other very important papers in that issue. It is very odd that the issue seems to have disappeared. Perhaps it is a temporary blip. The paper can still be seen here: full 44 page pdf file ( in new window)
April 12/14 ~ Defra issues £1.4bn IT outsourcing tender - "the last desperate act of an IT-illiterate top management" says David Taylor, Labour MP
article by Gareth Morgan in vnunet.com (external link)
"....despite opposition from MPs.
Defra will issue a tender today inviting companies to submit bids before 12 May to run its IT systems.
The deal is worth up to £85m a year, and will run from next summer until at least 2011, and possibly 2021.
.....David Taylor says DEFRA had rushed to finalise its IT strategy in
response to criticism (i.e. here re Rural Payments Agency report by EFRA Committee "The importance of the new IT system cannot be exaggerated: it will facilitate all of the activities of the Agency.")
from a Select Committee that it lacked one, rather
than develop an IT strategy to meet the Department's needs....Taylor, a former IT manager at Leicestershire County Council added that his 18 years' industry experience had led him to conclude that public sector outsourcing is "the last desperate act of an IT-illiterate top management" and that "IT suppliers often regard government as a cash cow"....
April 12/14 ~ " And there was me thinking his government had declared itself in favour of a thriving and profitable agricultural industry...."
Jeff Swift in the Westmorland Gazette
"The good Lord (Whitty I mean) was busy getting approval from the EU beef management committee to cut payments on the Over Thirty Months Scheme by 20 per cent.
You will recall that this is the scheme that destines all cattle over the age of 30 months to be burnt.
With this, Whitty would make sure we received the lowest payment in Europe.
And there was me thinking his government had declared itself in favour of a thriving and profitable agricultural industry.
In fact, that is what they said, so how dare Witty behave in such a fashion. Unless, of course, DEFRA really does stand for Destroying Every Farm Round About. ..."
April 12/14 ~ The Competition Commission said animal owners were paying over the odds for
prescription-only medicines
because manufacturers, wholesalers and vets
hold monopolies in the market.
One reason for this is that some vets do not tell customers they can ask for
prescriptions and get the drugs elsewhere, nor do they reveal the price of
the drugs before they are dispensed.....BBC (external link)
April 10/11 ~ Control and eradication of FMD by Sutmoller, Barteling,
Olascoaga and Sumption.
The pdf file of this paper can be seen here (external link to http://www.sciencedirect.com) This paper is a timely antidote to Prof Brownlie's (Royal Veterinary College, London)
paper on FMD control which was commisssioned by Dick Sibley of the BCVA.
Prof Brownlie's paper has been used to justify their anti-vaccination stance by government departments, senior veterinary figures, Ben Gill and many others. Extract: "...in Britain in particular, the ensuing epidemics
had very serious consequences for the rural society.
Movement restrictions created huge animal welfare
problems, while other measurements hampered sectors
like tourism. Export rules did not allow the use of even
limited vaccination around the outbreak and only
stamping-out was used to control the disease. The large
scale ring culling applied to create 'fire breaks' hit many
farming families and depopulated large areas of live-stock.....
.....The neutralizing antibodies in the
vaccinated animal are the best guarantee that meat,
blood, lymph nodes, bone marrow, organs etc. will be
free of FMD virus. We also want to point out that
millions of tons of meat from vaccinated South American
cattle have been imported into the EU without
causing FMD.
Another concern is the risk of mechanical contamination
of a cattle carcass or organs with 'carrier virus'
from the pharyngeal area. However, because of anti-bodies
in blood and other fluids and measures applied
during slaughter and processing (e.g. for BSE!) that risk
is negligible.
The probability of dissemination of FMD virus by
milk from vaccinated carriers also is close to zero
because the virus does not persist in the udder and
milk from vaccinated herds contains neutralizing anti-bodies.
The importation of milk and milk products from
countries that practice vaccination has never caused
FMD in FMD susceptible livestock...."
See full 44 page pdf file ( in new window) It is to be hoped that this new paper will ensure that many of the dogmas held by the anti vaccination lobby are reappraised.
April 10 ~ Regionalisation: "an agreed principle in the International Animal Health Organisation (OIE) ..long been enshrined in EU legislation on animal health conditions for trade and imports."
The EU's emphasis on so-called regionalisation comes across very strongly in this Memo from Brussels -
FMD - progress report (external link) "The Council had a debate on the progress made on the Commission proposal to revise the current legislation on how to prevent and control outbreaks of foot and mouth disease (FMD). Commissioner Byrne said: "The current proposal is a reform, not a revolution. It confirms our approach to prevention and control of FMD outbreaks."
The Council Members specifically discussed the regionalisation of affected areas in the case of an outbreak, which is an agreed principle in the International Animal Health Organisation (OIE) and has long been enshrined in EU legislation on animal health conditions for trade and imports. Mr Byrne assured Member States who were concerned that third countries would respect the principle that the Commission will continue to address the issue of regionalisation during trade or equivalence negotiations with third countries. "However, I also said I cannot guarantee that all third countries would unconditionally accept regionalisation and other control measures, including emergency vaccination, applied in the case of FMD."
Ministers also spoke about the use of emergency vaccination in the event of an outbreak and agreed that it should be used as a frontline response."
April 10 ~ "SARS: No hurdles presented by validation....yet, for FMD, we are still waiting."
An interesting article (external link) into the strange phenomenon of SARS by Leonard G. Horowitz, D.M.D., M.A., M.P.H. refers uncompromisingly to SARS as "Sickening and Repulsive Scam" and the article argues that it could be argued that SARS is ".. an ingenious social experiment featuring institutionalized bioterrorism for widespread psycho-social control...".".. With SARS, people were being frightened beyond reason, I realized. The classic definition of phobia was being manifested on a social, if not global, scale."
"Surely the SARS death rate, approximately 3%, was insufficient cause for such widespread panic. The media successfully whipped the Canadian population into a trembling mass of masked and quarantined "sheeple."
- If we find the article by Dr Horowitz far-fetched it occurs to us that we would never have believed, had we not lived through it, the way FMD policy turned a mild animal disease into a bizarre massacre.
An emailer writes today: "A couple of nights ago there was a news item on the frantic efforts to develop a diagnostic test for SARS. The attitude was that no effort would be spared - they would work flat out to refine this test and have it up and running asap. No hurdles presented by validation - that would all be dealt with (presumably because they feel we could be in an emergency situation). Contrast this with all the obstacles presented in the UK against the use of FMD tests, and the inexcusable delay in validation. The FMD tests were available and just needed the finishing touches, and yet still we are waiting...."
April 10 ~ "I can't be the only one that has noticed the "Stay where you are, don't move or you will catch it/spread it" parallels between SARS and the FMD epidemic
writes an emailer. " At least they aren't culling people... yet "
Also, from Viral scares
by Stuart Derbyshire "...SARS is a nasty form of pneumonia and certainly worth avoiding, especially if you are elderly or very young. It is also worth avoiding lightning, high velocity impact and poisonous animals. Viral infection, even the serious kind, is an everyday risk but, like many other everyday risks, it is being met with increasingly common precautionary warnings. It is easy to dismiss the CDC's ( Center for Disease Control )warnings as acting, in part, to cover its own back: it can always say 'we told you so' should tragedy strike a severely unlucky traveller.
"
Like the FSA, the CDC is probably not trying to make life difficult or create scares for its own private reasons - but our society seems increasingly terrified of risk itself or of being blamed for allowing "risk". Yet it is politically correct concern about Health and Safety that is, as people are beginning at last to recognise, the real threat to our traditional and hard won British freedoms. How easy it is to manipulate people if you tell them they are in danger of being attacked by terrorism, by a "killer" virus, by the irresponsibility of their neighbours... (See Goering quotation)
April 9 ~ "We hope that the RPA will at all times keep its customers - farmers -uppermost in its thoughts." EFRA Committee
The RPA is an Executive Agency of the DEFRA. It is the single paying agency responsible for CAP schemes in England and certain schemes throughout the UK.
The all-party EFRA (Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) Committee's sixth report of the 2002-3 session into the Rural Payments Agency
Among its main conclusions (external link) are:
- administrative errors were a major cause of subsidy delays after the introduction of cross-checks with the cattle tracing system
- the agency should not regard the electronic delivery of services using email or the internet as a panacea for its problems. "Late payments on bovine systems look likely to continue until the new IT system is up and running."
- the agency should try and simplify forms as it moved to electronic forms "we are not yet fully persuaded that the RPA is treating simplification of such forms with sufficient urgency. The matter should now be given the highest priority" (paragraph 17)
- "The Rural Payments Agency is a new organisation which has faced early problems. Some of these were not of the Agency's making while others, such as the complexity of IACS forms and low customer satisfaction, indicate areas which need prompt attention if the payment of CAP claims is to move into a new era of efficiency as promised. We welcome the steps which have been taken, and we urge the Agency to do more. We hope that the RPA will at all times keep its customers - farmers -uppermost in its thoughts.
Report
April 8 ~ "Since I had failed to work out for myself why such a ubiquitous ban should be imposed by the authorities, I set about trying to ask the authorities why this was so..."
James Irvine, FRSE DSc FInstBiol FRCPath FRCPEd
of land-care.org asks:
Why is it necessary to ban the burial of
all fallen stock? (external link)
Part I: Is it do with the supply of
drinking water?
".... .. To ban all burial on all farms of all fallen stock on the basis of the risk of transmitting BSE would now seem illogical.
So if it is not BSE that the authorities are worrying about, is it scrapie? ..........
Surely the ban on the burial of fallen sheep on farm is not related to the hypothetical risk of BSE being in sheep. So far there is no evidence that this is, or ever was, the case......If fears persist, then whether or not on farm burial is permitted could readily be linked to the scrapie resistance genotype status of the flock on individual farms.
What I am not referring to in this article is mass burial of slaughtered livestock such as occurred in the UK 2001 FMD crisis, as that is a totally different situation from the routine burial of fallen stock in the absence of any such epidemic.
Since I had failed to work out for myself why such a ubiquitous ban should be imposed by the authorities, I set about trying to ask the authorities why this was so."
See also the Scotsman (external link) todayConcerns remain high over carcase disposal "The government is expected today to offer to pay part of the cost of
disposing of animals which die on farms after on-farm burial is banned next
month.
But the offer by the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs to
unions at a meeting in London is expected to be a flat-rate annual payment
based on the size of livestock operation, not per animal...."
April 6/7 ~"Article 8 is not an authorisation for mass culling of healthy animals over vast swathes of countryside, such as happened in Cumbria and Dumfries and Galloway...."
Anne Lambourn comments on the newest draft proposals for the EU FMD Directive
extract from her comments:" Article 8 states that killing may be allowed of susceptible species likely to be contaminated , and, if considered necessary, of "epidemiologically linked production units or adjoining holdings" provided taking of samples and clinical examinations are carried out "at least in accordance with Annex III.
As the whole point of Annex III is to outline procedures for surveillance of live animals, and one is being asked to act in accordance with Annex III, presumably the sampling and diagnoses are meant to be carried out on live animals. (This approach would be consistent with the rest of the Directive, where the emphasis is very much on killing restricted to confirmed outbreaks, with testing/sampling and inspection elsewhere.)....
April 6/7 ~ Emergency Vaccination section of the new EU Draft FMD Directive Proposals
can be viewed here. "There are many important new criteria regarding implementing vaccination in this latest draft e.g. relative costs of strategies, social and psychological effects,. if forseeable that 24/48 hour rule of infected and contaminated premises will not be met, if large intensive livestock production units present...." (more) (More of the latest Draft Proposals)
April 6/7 ~ "Livermore assays are the underpinning of the Bush administration's new Bio-Watch system" Will the UK take heart from this?
While DEFRA continues in its Contingency Plan to maintain its option of slaughter on contiguous premises and of "firebreak" culls in the event of virus attack, the Bush administration is enthusiastically deploying these newly developed rapid diagnosis tests (including the USDA/Tetracore test
approved for use by the US Congress) and they are proving their worth in their ability to detect and identify viruses more rapidly than ever before. See below We are concerned to note that the UK and DEFRA appear to be showing no sense of urgency to follow suit - because they are saying the tests now being used in the US aren't yet validated and even say that they have yet to decide how they would be
used in the UK if and when the tests are validated....
This seems inexcusable procrastination in view of the havoc wrought by viral diseases such as Foot and Mouth in ruminants or exotic Newcastle disease among birds - not to mention viral diseases that threaten humans such as SARS and the risk of bio-terrorism.
The much more optimistic situation in the USA can be seen from
articles such as this one from Contra Costa Times, California, March 14
" The faster we can detect and move into control, the less economic impact this disease is going to have..
... Livermore assays are the underpinning of the Bush administration's new Bio-Watch system, a network of biodetectors being installed on air-pollution monitors in 20 major U.S. cities."......" The industry is huge in California and we are a food supplier nationally and internationally," said Livermore lab geneticist Paula McCready. To get back in business, "you have to prove your area and animals are disease-free"...."before the birds were killed, the rapid test uncovered the vaccine strain and avoided a near $1 million indemnity for the flock.
"You can imagine the relief that farmer felt," she said.
April 4 ~"... the use of lay vaccinators (suitably trained and competent individuals acting under the direction of a veterinary surgeon)"
Under legislation from the 1960s and still applicable, (The Veterinary Surgeons Act 1966 and The Medicines Act 1968) the administration of FMD vaccine to livestock is "strictly limited to specified categories of people such as veterinary surgeons."
DEFRA's Contingency Planning Division
says, "By extending the exemptions to allow the use of lay vaccinators (suitably trained and competent individuals acting under the direction of a veterinary surgeon) this could increase the number of people available to vaccinate in the event of an outbreak. We are considering ways in which this might be possible."
We hope that DEFRA is also considering the fact that in Uruguay in 2001 it was the country's farmers themselves who successfully carried out the mass vaccination of cattle. This is well documented. It would be churlish of the SVS to assume that British farmers and stockmen were less competent than their South American equivalents.
April 4 ~" I was confronted with the (anti-vaccination) views of a farmers' leader.... When I explained why his arguments were false, he got red in the face and discontinued the discussion. That is how people react when you attack "belief systems"..."
For those who would like to examine how belief systems got in the way of humane and scientifically sound policy in 2001 - the correspondence between Dr Simon Barteling and Dr Alex Donaldson following the Brussels FMD conference in December 2001. The open letters here present, examine and refute the arguments used so often by the powerful UK non-vaccination group.
Time is running out. This correspondence is essential reading for those who wish to ensure that the EU Draft Directive and the UK Contingency Plans are based on sound scientific, veterinary and ethical principles. The policy of mass slaughter was a terrible and tragic mistake. If we are not careful it will be repeated because of mere dogma even now still masquerading as the "best scientific and veterinary advice"
April 4 ~ "Where the outcome of these discussions may influence a future policy, I think the matter is too important to leave essential questions unanswered." Dr Barteling
"Essential questions" concern the dogmas held by so many who are - most unfortunately - still hoping to direct policy here and in the EU. Examples include: - ".. at the start of the epidemic we didn't have enough vaccine to apply mass vaccination...? "You know very well that in Europe large amounts of very potent emergency vaccines are and were available.."
- "Paul Sutmoller and I and a number of other senior colleagues (FMD specialists) consider the (possible) presence of vaccinated carrier cattle also an acceptable "near to zero" risk. We base that on the fact that there is no evidence that the millions of vaccinated (A, O, and C-type) carriers that in the past must have been around in Europe and in South America ever caused new outbreaks."
- " .. documented cases of animals vaccinated with a qualified vaccine causing new outbreaks?" "To my knowledge (and to the knowledge of many of our colleagues) there are not. I am realising that this touches an almost central dogma in (FMD) veterinary science that carriers are by definition dangerous. But we have to face it, unless you know of any case. It means that vaccinated carriers do not excrete sufficient virus to cause further outbreaks.." This statement is carefully elaborated.
- "Vaccination against FMD prevents the symptoms but does not eradicate the disease...?"
Dr Barteling cites many examples that FMD has indeed been eradicated by consistent vaccination with a qualified vaccine
- ".. in Europe vaccination did not eradicate the virus?" ..How could we in 1991 stop vaccination and demonstrate freedom of FMD?" There follows a detailed explanation of how outbreaks in Europe were not as a result of consistent vaccination but rather from "poorly inactivated vaccines - methods of inactivation were not as safe as to day - or escapes from laboratories and vaccine plants and had nothing to do with insufficient protection by vaccination or with ongoing disease."
- ".. we need better vaccines?" ... the vaccines of the European Vaccine Banks when tested at CCI protected all cattle vaccinated with a full dose. Even 80 % of the cattle vaccinated with a quarter of a dose was protected against injection with virus on the tongue, a level that is generally considered to give sufficient herd protection...The price of such a vaccine that may possibly induce lifelong protection does not need to be exorbitant (I
guess between 2 and 3 euros for a mono-valent dose)"
- "It is not essential that vaccination was discussed 10 or 20 times. It is crucial that vaccination was not used where it was clear from the rising outbreak numbers, that the culling practice was not proving effective and that vaccination was the only tool left."
All the evidence and details given in these letters - of which the above is only a small example - deserve to be read in full.
April 4 ~ "What happened in the U.K. was understandable."
"Once rural communities are so much damaged by a stamping-out and a (circle) culling policy, it becomes all the time more difficult to recognize (and demonstrate) that vaccination works. One wants to demonstrate that proper choices were made (not "losing face") and wishful thinking makes the authorities declare "It is all under control" and, "we are on the right track". In the meantime the nightmare continues because FMD does not listen to what authorities declare or "modellers" predict...."
It will be remembered perhaps that those who continue, after all these long months, to press for an alternative to the mass slaughter in 2001 do so for reasons that might puzzle those mathematicians, politicians, scientists and "stakeholders" who insisted upon it. Dr Barteling and others have nothing material to gain by their continuing efforts. They are not interested in face-saving or retrospective justification. They are not trying to win votes or keep members in line. They are not hoping for research grants.
Dr Barteling talks of ethics. "... the anti-vaccination attitude and the acceptance of the approach of the epidemiologists / modellers have led to the large-scale killing of the 2001 epidemic. Not only that so many million animals were killed also lives of farmers - many dairy farmers and hobby farmers in particular - were damaged not to speak about the reported suicides. Many of the farmers still suffer from the traumatic experiences..." Read the correspondence
April 4 ~ Response by the Countryside Alliance to the consultation document on the preparation of an animal health and welfare strategy for Great Britain 2003
may be read here.
Extract: "The Countryside Alliance welcomes the general ideas laid down in Section 4.1 and elaborated in Section 10 (external link to DEFRA's consultation document) for the proposed Strategy's aims. As mentioned above, we are aware that these are preliminary, general proposals. We are, however, somewhat disturbed by the fact that while leisurely negotiations continue about the Strategy, whose timetable seems a little unclear, a great deal of detailed and often contentious legislation is being put into place. We refer especially to the Animal Health Act 2002, SI843, which laid down rules for dealing with infectious diseases but had to be amended within weeks of passing (a fact that would indicate unnecessary haste in the promulgation), the currently discussed FMD Contingency plan as well as the Draft EU Directive on FMD and the proposed Animal Welfare Bill. Should an overall Strategy not be laid down first, perhaps decided on a little faster, with specific legislation to follow? ..."
April 4 ~ Ah yes...."scientific advice"....
Shadow Defra Secretary David Lidington
called on the Government on Thursday to opt out of the new EU
regulation at least temporarily.
"Is not the sensible course of action now for you to apply urgently for
a derogation from the fallen stock provisions of this regulation so that
a proper effective scheme can be put into place rather than the farmers
face the confusion that they may face at the moment from the beginning
of May?" he asked.
Ms Beckett said: "This
isn't something that has come out of the blue, we have been discussing
it with the industry for a full year. There is capacity to deal with the
problem now. There is no practical need for a derogation.
The key thing you're perhaps losing sight of is that the reason the
regulations were introduced in the first place was on the basis of
scientific advice that the present position was undesirable and should
be ended as soon as possible."
It was asked whether pet owners would be allowed to continue to bury their pets in their gardens....
See again this letter on the subject of on-farm burial from Lawrence Wright
April 3 ~"...any move to go down the vaccination route must be preceded by changes to international trading rules," said union spokesman Alan Morris.."
The Welsh Assembly FMD Contingency Plan (external link) says, "Emergency vaccination will be considered, as a means of controlling the disease and
its use will be based on SVO advice...."
It is reported in the Farmers' Weekly Interactive that The Farmers' Union of Wales expressed concern about the Plan.
"We believe that any move to go down the vaccination route must be preceded by changes to international trading rules," said union spokesman Alan Morris.
"UK farmers must not be disadvantaged when the outbreak is over."
Perhaps Mr Morris has not kept as up to date as he might have done on the changes to the OIE rules. Tests to differentiate between vaccinated animals and those that are infected are now fully available to us. That allowed the OIE (the Office Internationale d'Epizootic) to reduce the time for a return to disease-free status from 12 months to six. The Farmers Union of Wales, apparently following the lead of the NFU, set its face against vaccination at the very time when, had vaccination been used in the way clearly and practically indicated by the virologist Dr Ruth Watkins, the slaughtering out of thousands of irreplaceable hefted sheep in Brecon -( unnecessary as it was anyway on scientific and veterinary grounds ) - would not have happened.
In fact, the FWi has got it wrong by saying the Contingency Plan "insists that a "vaccinate to live" policy would be introduced"
"Would" suggests inevitability (just as Mr Morris' use of the word "must" implies an assumption that the FUW should dictate policy) It is very much to be hoped that ground-breaking new advances in rapid diagnosis together with swift and efficient vaccination will alleviate any future epidemic - but there is no sense of "insisting" or inevitability in any reference to vaccination here - nor any practical details of how it would happen.
April 3 ~ References in the Welsh Assembly FMD Contingency Plan to vaccination:
Although the incorrect spelling of liaise has been overlooked in this Welsh Contingency Plan document (as it also is in the latest Draft of the EU Directive) a great deal of care - as in the EU Directive - appears to have been taken with the choice of language concerning the use of vaccination.
Emergency vaccination will be considered, as a means of controlling the disease and
its use will be based on SVO advice...
....European Commission requires that a stamping out policy be undertaken to control
FMD and that consideration is given to emergency vaccination
...If emergency vaccination is used it would be on the basis of vaccinate-to-live
wherever possible
...For this strategy to work a number of logistical,
technical and trade problems need to be resolved in consultation with
interested parties.....Vaccination will be in the forefront of consideration of an appropriate
disease control strategy....
2.25 Vaccination contingency plans are currently being developed at national level by
DEFRA in discussion with Stakeholders and the Devolved Administrations. The
decision to use vaccination as a disease control measure would be taken at Gold
Command Level of DEFRA. Interim plans are in place for an emergency
vaccination programme with longer-term arrangements being developed. Vaccine
supplies are currently being reviewed at both national and international level...."
At least the references are there - but they can hardly be said to amount to a wholehearted commitment to vaccination as a tool of first resort. Such a commitment would certainly be deplored by those who evaded its use last time - but a proper practical plan to use the newly developed rapid on-site diagnosis technology and protective vaccination is profoundly hoped for by many family farmers and others who still find it hard to believe in the callousness of the 2001 mass slaughter policies. As Barteling and Sutmoller say in their paper: Culling versus vaccination: challenging a dogma in veterinary (FMD) science
" Massive killing and destruction of livestock is usually not done with adequate respect for animal welfare and bio-ethical principles.....many culls represent a human tragedy and a traumatic experience not only for farmers and their families, but for many veterinarians and others in the rural societies as well. The risk-avoidance behaviour of farmers leads to social isolation and breakdown of the social-economic and trading patterns of rural communities."
April 2 ~ The pros and cons - stamping-out or (circle) culling, or by (ring-) vaccination around the outbreak area
The paper by Dr Simon Barteling, Consultant Veterinary Vaccines and Paul Sutmoller, Animal Health Consultant, former chief of Laboratories of the Panamerican Foot and Mouth Disease Center PAHO/WHO
"...Outbreaks of FMD can either be controlled by stamping-out or (circle) culling, or by (ring-) vaccination around the outbreak area, or by a combination of the two methods. The pros and cons of the two methods are discussed.
A major draw-back - next to many other disadvantages - of the massive circle culling is its contribution to spreading disease.
.......Stamping-out of outbreak and "contact" farms can be used as a first approach to control outbreaks, however, they should be based on a proper evaluation of epidemiological and risk factors for each individual contact farm. Massive circle culling will likely contribute to further spread of disease and, therefore may well extend the duration of an epidemic. We also have pointed out several other reasons why circle culling cannot be justified as a method to control outbreaks.
We have shown that the statement - almost a dogma in veterinary science - that "vaccination against FMD will prevent the symptoms, but will not eradicate the disease" will not hold true. We have also shown, that the risk of vaccinated carriers causing new outbreaks must be negligible. We suggest that this risk should be assessed and that perceived threats of vaccinated animals for the export position of a country should not be used to justify the wholesale killing of healthy livestock."
..." (full paper)
April 2 ~"...it seems that nothing was learnt. Maybe it is psychological. Some people long for catastrophes that make them feel important. Vaccination is too simple...."
The latest EU revised document and comments will be posted as soon as possible
April 2 ~ The apparent lack of official interest in how the FMD virus reached us is surely one of the strangest aspects of the crisis.
We understand that there have been no prosecutions since the start of the sniffer dog pilot scheme. From 11 April, Customs and Excise will take over responsibility from DEFRA for anti-smuggling controls on illegal imports of meat and other animal products imported directly from non-EU countries at ports and airports. They plan to increase the number of detector dogs from two to six.
The VLA Report suggested that the amount of illegally imported meat contaminated with FMD virus was estimated to be between 30 and 250kg per year - but this was pure speculation. The following is a quotation from page iii. of the Executive Summary:"This estimate is influenced by the estimate of prevalence of FMD in each region which is in turn based upon country level estimates of prevalence. Countries fall into two main categories; those considered internationally to be free from FMD, and those considered to have endemic FMD. For countries considered to have endemic FMD, module 2 estimates the probable prevalence of FMD in each country. For countries categorised as free, the model estimates both the probability of an incursion, and the probable prevalence before detection in free countries should they suffer an incursion. For both categories, historical outbreak occurrence data reported to the Office International des Epizooties (OIE) is used as the primary data source, supplemented with data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), the European Commission for the Control of Foot and Mouth Disease (EUFMD), and FMD World Reference Laboratories, especially Pirbright, with the data adjusted for suspected under-reporting. For a number of countries considered, there is no source of direct data on their FMD status and assumptions based on their regionality are made. This is a key area of data deficiency. The situation regarding suspected and assumed under-reporting is similar."
It is perhaps important to remember that no one has yet made any definitive public statement about the origins of the foot and mouth crisis in the UK in 2001 - nor has anything much been said about investigations into how the virus reached the UK. The unions talk loudly about illegal imports and assumptions are made - but assumptions are not evidence.
April 2 ~ Before World War II there were more than 800 livestock markets across Wales and England. By the time foot-and-mouth struck in February 2001 just 180 remained..there are 156 still operating but many are under threat.
Four out of five livestock markets in Wales and England could close within 10 years.
Livestock markets are under threat from legislation from Europe as part of the Common Agricultural Policy reform which has for some time wanted to reduce livestock numbers. There can be little doubt that the UK government shares this aim.
Another threat comes from proposals to restrict travelling between markets. There are plans for a 150km (i.e. 93 miles) restriction.
A threat to livestock markets will mean supermarkets will tighten their grip on farming even more. According to icwales
Glyn Powell, former deputy president of the Farmers' Union of Wales and a sheep farmer from Sennybridge, said the power of supermarkets was never better illustrated than when Safeway purchased Brecon Livestock Market.
"A supermarket can eat the very heart out of a town," said Mr Powell. "Whereas prior to the supermarket, farmers would bring their wives in with them to the livestock market, that doesn't happen now. It just goes to show how powerful supermarkets are when they can purchase a piece of land that was the hub and focal point of Brecon."
Brecon's town centre site was sold to Safeway
March 29/April 1 ~ We are in danger of continuing to protect farm exports at all costs, instead of using every opportunity to make the case for good science and humane practice
In 2001 scorn was poured on vaccination by senior vets and others - presumably because of the traditional slaughter mindset of their training. Keith Baker, himself the past president of the British Veterinary Association, claimed it offered "no guarantee" of protection. In Brussels, even as late as December 2001, and to the astonishment of the FMD experts gathered there from Europe and the rest of the world, Mrs Beckett was still reciting such mantras as "Vaccination would be very difficult because consumers would not want to eat the meat from vaccinated animals" and "We have no guarantee that vaccination is safe for the animals" and "The disease itself, if left unchecked, causes extreme suffering and even death to animals" and "Vaccination is expensive, a massive logistical challenge.." and even "There are no tests to distinguish between animals that have been vaccinated and those which have had the disease..."
Shameful. The UK's refusal to use vaccination resulted in outrageous losses - to our rural economy, our international reputation and the trust of our farmers in the very Ministry they thought was there to guide them for their good.
In the same year as our own crisis, the disease was eradicated in Uruguay in 15 weeks, and fewer than 7,000 animals were killed.
There are those with vested interests in maintaining the status quo who will continue to direct policy away from vaccination. Presumably they fear that there may be no market abroad for UK pedigree stock and that vaccination will result in a loss of profits at home. Perhaps there are also those who wish to save what face the UK has left by continuing denial that the policies were wrong. Professor King's often quoted insistence that the same recipe of culling will apply should a further foot-and-mouth disease outbreak occur seems to inform the latest version of the Contingency Plan (new window). We can only hope the EU Directive will close the loopholes that would allow this to happen. But we very much fear that innocent-looking amendments will leave them wide open. We are in danger of continuing to protect farm exports at all costs, instead of using every opportunity to make the case for good science and humane practice.
March 29/April 1 ~ "The plan also leaves open the question of whether vaccination would be
used to deal with any future outbreak."
The article in today's Western Morning News EU Rules Renew Threat of Pyres over FMD
"... Although it will be considered as
an option, little work appears to have been done to persuade the food
industry to take meat from vaccinated animals."
Misinformation still abounds in Britain about vaccination and why it was consistently turned down in 2001. One error is that the food industry refused its use. There has never been any consumer resistance to purchase and consumption of
FMD vaccinated meat. Before the UK 2001 epidemic the question never even arose. It had never posed any problem or been an issue to the public or the food industry. William Moyes of the British Retail Consortium told BBC News (external link): "So long as the advice remains from the Food Standards Agency and from the government's scientific advisors that there is absolutely no threat to human health - and that is the advice - supermarkets have told the government that they will stock milk and dairy products from vaccinated animals."
At no time did retailers lobby for or against the vaccination of animals as an alternative to slaughter. This was made clear by William Moyes at the inquiry by the EU Temporary Committee into FMD at Strasbourg in 2002. He explained that he had told the Prime Minister that he and other members who were consulted at the time were happy to let the Government decide and that his members would have had no objection to vaccination as long as certain conditions were met. (See letter)
March 29/April 1 ~ Horse Passports - an important note about an opt-out page
See note below on Horse Passports. A vet writes, " Please note these Passports should contain an OPT OUT page where an owner can state that the animal will never enter the 'Human Food Chain'.
Thus the horse will not risk becoming an illegal export for meat , nor be slaughtered for meat in UK.
Any Vet treating the animal has his own choice of drugs available and does not have to record each drug treatment. This will result in better treatment options and a financial saving to owners, easily out weighing what should be a once off fee for passport.
If it stops the illegal export of horses for slaughter, when an owner signs this page then the exercise will be worth while, but the position if the page is not signed leaves me with a number of questions which to date I have had no answer to."
March 29/April 1 ~ "The decision whether to vaccinate is entirely a matter for the Government.."
wrote William Moyes, the Director General of the British Retail Consortium on April 13 2001.
Two years on, at this eleventh hour before final amendments are made to the EU Directive on FMD, we still agonise about what exactly stopped the UK vaccinating last time - and whether it could happen again. The 1981 Animal Health Act clearly allowed forcible entry to vaccinate stock not yet infected. That the new Act extends that legality to the killing of healthy stock is deeply worrying.
In 2001 teams of vaccinators were being trained at the public expense, there was enough vaccine available and a firm in Stroud had been lined up to deliver enough safe syringes. However, insistence from "experts" that vaccination didn't work - (now clearly refuted by the various Inquiry reports) - and the proclaimed belief that there would be no market for vaccinated products stopped it.
Mr Moyes, anxious for his members' livelihoods but not opposed to vaccination, wrote:
" We believe the maintenance of public confidence requires the following :-
- An unequivocal and authoritative assurance that FMD and vaccination poses no threat to human health... The FSA is best placed to give this. (but see below)
- No "two tier" system i.e. no separate identification at any stage of milk supplies or dairy products from vaccinated herds.
- At the point where the introduction of vaccination is announced a clear statement that milk from vaccinated herds will be used as part of general milk supplies.
- Public support from farmers' representatives
... "
No such coordinated communications strategy was forthcoming.
March 29/April 1 ~ The fear that vaccinated products may not find a market is still apparently raised at stockholders' meetings and may well be a major part of the reason for the UK's continuing refusal seriously to consider vaccination.
Concern has been raised on other occasions that the FSA may well create worry where none existed before by the simple method of issuing lukewarm reassurances - more recently, about the safety of eating lamb, for example.
"The Food Standards Agency is satisfied that the use of such a vaccine would not have any
implications for food safety."FSA press release
At first glance, the press release from the FSA in 2001 was clear. However, could it have been the FSA Question and Answer section of their press release that - far from being the unequivocal and authoritative assurance hoped for by the retailers, first raised worries about "consumer choice" , "antibodies in milk" etc. because of the ambiguity of its answers?
"Q.It has been reported that shops say they will only stock milk and meat from FMD vaccinated
animals if consumers want to buy them. Surely there is a danger that consumers will simply
stop buying all British meat and milk if they are not confident of what they are buying?
A. We understand the supermarkets concern about consumer confidence. But, we are dealing
with a situation that is very well understood. The disease is well known, it has been around
for a long time. It has been studied very extensively and we are confident that there is no
human health risk from vaccinated milk or meat from vaccinated animals.
The food industry's role in balking FMD vaccination, denied by the British Retail Consortium - and the misinformation about labelling swiftly corrected by the Consumer Council had their origins somewhere - but not with the BRC or the Consumer Council.
March 29/April 1 ~ More chiefs than Indians
(Christopher Booker in the Sunday Telegraph, March 30)
"A recruitment advertisement for the Meat Hygiene Service, part of Sir John Krebs's Food Standards Agency, boasts that lucky applicants will become part of the team of "2,250 officials" whose job is to enforce EU hygiene regulations on Britain's "1,300 licensed meat premises". Since most of these are cutting plants and cold stores requiring only occasional visits, this means that most of the MHS officials concentrate their zeal on our 300-odd surviving slaughterhouses. This works out at around six officials for each business, making our abattoirs easily the most highly-regulated industry in Britain.
It is 10 years since the Danish government admitted that it employed 29,000 officials to regulate Denmark's 29,000 farmers, equating to one official for each farmer. Now, thanks to Sir John and his team, it seems Britain is again bidding to lead the world."
March 29 ~ Defra's Foot and Mouth Disease Contingency Plan (version 3) laid before Parliament.
(see responses on this website)
The Plan was laid in accordance with Section 18 of the Animal Health Act
2002, which came into force on March 27.
DEFRA says "it is expected that it will be subject to ongoing revision
taking on the latest scientific advice, developments in policy and comments
from stakeholders and operational partners.
The Plan will be reviewed at least annually to meet the provisions of the
Animal Health Act."
The Contingency Plan can be found on the Defra website at
www.defra.gov.uk/animalh/diseases/fmd/contingency/contingency.htm with an
e-mail box for comments - or can be opened in a new window by clicking here (large file).
March 29 ~ Horse Passports - all members of the equine family will have to have a passport from 31 December 2003 to safeguard the food chain
Although we do not eat horsemeat in this country we do, according to DEFRA, kill 10,000 to 12,000 horses and export the meat. Therefore the UK is enthusiastically implementing the EU regulations demanding that all horses and foals of more than six months have "passports" in order to " ensure that only approved drugs will be given by vets to horses which are destined for human consumption."
There will be - of course - a Central Horse Database.
Wild horses and ponies registered and listed on a central register held and administered by their respective authorities (the Dartmoor Commoners Council, the Exmoor Pony Society and the New Forest Verderers) will not need actual passports.
All other equines, even in these areas, will be required to have one.
There are, as usual, harsh penalties for ignoring this regulation. These are: - a fine to a maximum of £5000 for herds of one to ten animals and a maximum fine of £1000 per animal for herds of over ten animals. Second offences carry a term of a maximum of one month's imprisonment. (See DEFRA news release)
March 29 ~"... money intended to benefit farmers gets diluted before it ever reaches them."
writes Jeff Swift in the Westmorland Gazette's Over the Gate.
"The question that is being frequently asked nowadays is "Are there too many groups and organisations going about advising farmers on change, the future and what would be the best way ahead for individual farmers?" The usual answer from farmers is "yes", and I agree with them. All too often, money intended to benefit farmers gets diluted before it ever reaches them. Too much is siphoned off in administration - talk about something that needs changing.
And while we're at it, we might as well change the jobs of those scientists who spend their time trying to justify their existence by seeking to prove there is BSE in the national sheep flock when we know there isn't...."
There will be many from other professions and public services who wholeheartedly agree. Money quoted in government statistics and graphs rarely filters down to those on the ground level who could make it work. People want to get on with the job they understand without the stifling layers of management , centralisation and bureaucracy so entirely alien to the British character. (Just because we now have the technology to hold the fingerprints and DNA of the entire population on government computers should not mean that legislation is changed so that this can be done.) A government that believes control from the centre = efficient management of the countryis woefully mistaken.
March 28 ~ " My Lords, is the Minister really serious?
Lord Mackie of Benshie: My Lords, is the Minister really serious when he says that there is no derogation for hill farms? Is a hill farmer supposed to carry an old ewe down to the farm from a high hill and then spend goodness knows how much on having it collected by lorry when for generations such animals have either been buried or left to lie, and the water in the Highland hills is the purest you can find? "
.......Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer: My Lords, will the regulation apply to animals which are pets?
Lord Whitty: My Lords, the provisions concerning on-farm burial will apply to all animals on farms.
See the Lords debate on Animal Carcasses: Disposal from March 19.
March 28 ~ Defra has definitely acted unlawfully by obtaining a writ to seize all my possessions to cover their so-called costs.
The latest news from Janet Hughes.
" I am hoping that the various people concerned will act more properly with the involvement of a legal professional at last.
With this proposed change of law on bailiff actions (Telegraph (external link)) it seems crucial for people to know that the government feels able to obtain warrants illegally. If the Bill became law then bailiffs would be able to force entry on the first visit to a property, which is not the current situation. If the occupier was absent they could return to an emptied house, and it is fully possible that their possessions would have been seized unlawfully...."
March 27 ~ registration schemes, for commercial and pet pigs, are to be tightened up
Publicity was given yesterday to the part of the new VLA's risk assessment report (external link) that suggests
"the amount of illegal meat contaminated with the FMD virus could be between 30kg (66lb) and 244kg (539lb) a year.
Of this between 20g and 680g (175g on average) is eaten by livestock. Pigs are the biggest risk and registration schemes, for commercial and pet pigs, are to be tightened up..." We also read: "Scientists at the Veterinary Laboratories Agency (VLA) admit current safeguards are failing to intercept all the meat and meat products brought in unlawfully."
However, the VLA submission in 2002 to the Royal Society (pdf file - external link)) contained this paragraph: A simplistic view of scientific methods would suggest that modern, highly sensitive
biotechnology-based techniques could be applied to enable mass-screening of imports.
This has serious practical impediments in terms of sampling strategy, and is literally
looking for a "needle in a haystack"....The ability of even the most sensitive technology to detect
such low level contamination is seriously limited..."
If the mass screening of imports for pathogens is really virtually impossible, the UK's continuing resistance to innovative weapons against animal disease such as the USDA/Tetracore portable real-time RT-PCR test is difficult to comprehend - particularly since most of the stages of validation have already been successfully completed and the test has been approved for use by the US Congress. This peer reviewed article on the Tetracore rapid diagnosis test (external link) was published in June 2002.
Use of the test might prove a greater insurance against a repeat of the 2001 FMD tragedy than increasing the number of sniffer dogs searching out needles in haystacks from 2 to 7.
March 27 ~ "it is difficult to identify genuinely independent advice
that is informed by sufficient expertise..."
The first page of the pdf file of the written submission to the Royal Society Inquiry into Infectious diseases in livestock from the Veterinary Laboratories
Agency (VLA) also contained a telling paragraph: "We are not convinced that the plethora of funding bodies and departments, advisory and steering
groups within the UK is generating the appropriate degree of co-ordination for food animal disease
research. Such groups have overlapping responsibilities and at times may be pulling in different
directions. There are many vested interests, and it is difficult to identify genuinely independent advice
that is informed by sufficient expertise. There is a need for better strategic planning of research in the
area, linked to proper long-term funding plans to develop and sustain the resources needed. This
research strategy should include a balance between short, medium and long term priorities - at
present too much of the resource is directed to short term crisis issues. "
This timely criticism would seem to us to contain much scope for genuine improvement in the area of animal disease control. What we always seem to get, however, is a flurry of activity rather than achievement,and the imposition upon farmers, abattoirs, markets and even pet owners of yet more bureaucracy and regulations.
March 26 ~ ".. A diktat from Brussels, which Defra never wanted, which is impossible to comply with except at ludicrous cost, yet which Defra's officials will now enforce with all the zeal for which they are legendary."
Muckspreader this week on the "waste problem" that has been conjured up entirely by the EU and DEFRA
"....under what Defra calls the National Fallen Stock collection and disposal scheme, the farmers will have to place their dead animals in wheelie bins, to be picked up by some friendly trucker and carried across the countryside to a licensed rendering plant to be turned into powder. Defra attaches particular importance to keeping a full record of every transaction, just in case there might be any problem with disease, although it hasn't yet worked out how to prevent diseased corpses spreading infection from farm to farm ....
... the renderers and their truckers will not be providing their services for nothing. Anything up to £250 has been quoted for a cow. Even those lambs chucked into the wheelie bin could cost £15 or £25 for a collection. Defra itself estimates the total cost to the farming community at £20 million a year.
"It is for the livestock industry", pronounces Rosa Klebb (aka Mrs Beckett) "like other industries to work out best how to deal with its waste problems and to pay their associated costs".
So even though this particular 'waste problem' has been conjured up entirely by the EU and Rosa herself, the farmers must pay. And if you're wondering why there isn't an outcry from continental farmers about the new law, that's because in most other EU countries their governments have agreed to foot the bill. "
March 25 ~" The Commercial Farmers Group - a UK-wide organisation comprised mainly of
larger operators - launches a discussion paper in the House of Lords today.
...The authors of the CFG paper, who include Lord Carter, a Labour peer with
a keen interest in agriculture.....Henry Fell, chairman of CFG, said: "We take our food for granted, but unless we return home food production to a level of greater sustainability and profitability, then we could be in trouble.
..." Today's Scotsman (external link)
Lord Carter's keen interest in agriculture has been noted on these pages - as has the pro-GM stance of the Commercial Farmers Group. Lord Carter advises Tony Blair on agriculture. He was not one of the Lords who so gallantly raised amendments and argued for sanity in the Animal Health Bill Queries about scientific evidence, appeal procedures, disease transmission all showed a lamentable lack of understanding or ability to cite evidence on the part of the Government. Lord Carter gaped in bewilderment when the Countess of Mar appealed for owners of sheep who did not want them slaughtered to be allowed to keep them as pets. Such a thing was beyond his comprehension As so often in the past five years, we find it alarming that the "best scientific and veterinary advice" together with the voices from farming that are the loudest and most powerful - the "larger operators" indeed - are resulting in such worrying legislation. Far from helping ordinary decent farmers - much current legislation is hastening their demise. The consequences of this triumph of big commercialisation over family farmers' care for the country will be disastrous for us all. If the smaller farmers are forced out of business, it will affect our food and our way of life - by finally delivering control of the land into the hands of big business. Horror stories of Tyson's dealings with its suppliers should warn us all about a future that looks more likely for the UK too.
March 25 ~ The Office of Fair Trading has pulled out of a secret meeting today with small suppliers to discuss the failure of its Code of
Practice to halt bully-boy tactics by Britain's supermarkets.
See press release from the CLA "The meeting...was arranged in secret to avoid supermarkets finding out and making
further trading even more difficult for the small businesses by possible
reprisals and threats of losing their trade.
....More than 30 organisations have agreed to meet and include the Fair Deal
Group, small food producers, print and packaging suppliers, fruit and
vegetable associations.
After today's meeting the Country Land and Business Association (CLA)
expects to be asked by the Fair Deal Group to lobby the OFT on the group's
behalf calling for all retailers to be forced to participate in the Code of
Conduct and not just those with over eight per cent of market share. The
code should also be reviewed to find out why it isn't working and make all
necessary changes...." (More)
March 25 ~ The current EU Draft Directive gives no "automatic" justification for suppressive vaccination in the 3 km surveillance zone
We are very grateful to Anne Lambourn for sending us her notes for distribution to the EU Environment Committee. She is concerned at some of the suggested amendments to the Directive."The EU Draft document does not authorise killing animals "at risk". It refers to animals likely to be infected or contaminated . (Annex X. 1b). This is a very different proposition. There is no authorisation in the Draft Directive, nor in the current Directive, for blanket firebreak killing of healthy stock. ...."The Commission must be seen to be independent of Member States' internal politics, and to be acting swiftly to enforce the "rules". The "collaboration" suggested with the Member State could take up valuable time in an emergency, and the procedure may be abused by parties who have vested interests against vaccination.. The disproportionate influence of individuals and organisations strongly opposed to vaccination on the disease control policy in the UK 2001 epidemic, and the associated propagation of outdated/incorrect information is well documented. ....If the Commission had this overriding power, then it is to be hoped it would use it in any future outbreak of FMD to ensure that the best disease control policy was being employed.
"
Other important main points made are that - the contingency plan should be updated yearly
- "emergency vaccination shall be introduced" as opposed to "seriously considered"
- There is an urgent need for clarity in the Draft Directive concerning the definition of Infected Premises and Contaminated Premises.
- The animal and human costs in the UK 2001epidemic, through mass killing of uninfected premises, were enormous.
- The financial costs were also huge, and potentially a "can of worms"...See below
March 25 ~ it was apparently claimed by Defra that all Infected and Contiguous Premises had been tested for FMD
From the notes for the Environment Committee. "I refer to the Defra submission to the OIE for Disease Free Status, where it was apparently claimed by Defra that all Infected and Contiguous Premises had been tested for FMD (thus supporting claims for reimbursement from the EU for help towards compensation payments handed out to farmers). See extract below from Defra submission (example : "Where there was no clinical evidence of disease, blood samples were taken for serological examination and if FMD antibodies were detected, disease was confirmed on the holding......" (N.B. Samples were certainly not taken in all of these cases)
The Environment Committee meets for discussion on Tuesday 25th March and we can only hope and trust that they have truly understood the points that the writer and others have tried so hard to put to them for their consideration.
March 24/25 ~ "It is so deceptive. They say they have no idea as to how the warrant was in fact issued."
Janet Hughes writes, "Having written again to the High Court, this time the Administrative Section, I have been told on the phone today that they have no record at all of having issued the warrant. One court official told me that they were sent a copy of the warrant. It is so deceptive. They say they have no idea as to how the warrant was in fact issued. Someone in the court office knows because their official seal has been used on the writ, dated 5 November 2002.
This instance is an isolated case but what if Defra tried it again in obtaining a warrant to enter premises to kill animals in the owner's absence or take computer equipment and so on? If they have been able to obtain a warrant falsely this time then it will surely happen again.
The Office Manager in the Admin section of the High Court has told me that the matter is being investigated. I hope that I will be given a truthful answer as to how the warrant was issued. I do not believe that Defra has sufficient grounds for obtaining the writ and this is why they have done it in this underhand fashion. There is no judge's order expressly ordering me to pay them anything; only an order refusing permission for judicial review in August 2001. Of course they have not cited that order on the writ - presumably because it does provide them with the rights to enforce a so-called debt against me. "
March 24 ~ John Greenway's Equine Welfare Ragwort Control Private Members bill has successfully completed its second reading - Not so the Food Labelling Bill, unfortunately.
- Hansard link. Stephen O'Brien's Food Labelling Bill - whose key objective is honesty in food labelling - was late on the Order Papers on 7th March and had only five minutes. It has not been been dropped but is now back in the queue. It is not likely to be debated again in this session of Parliament.
March 24 ~ "The piece by Alan Beat mentioning the report from Canada struck a loud chord with me"
(click here for Alan Beat's comment) writes a farmer this morning: "Our farm did not get FMD despite being on a Form D for many, many months during 2001. We allowed a Defra vet on twice and each time .... allowed her to look at the sheep and cows through the window only. All the other myriad of inspections/blood tests we suffered were conducted by our own vet. He had not been exposed to anything like the level of infection of the Defra vets if at all.
The interesting point to my story is that on the 4th March 2002 we were contacted by an official who told us he was undertaking a survey of farmers on behalf of the Royal Society for use in their enquiry. The survey sought to ascertain why some farms contracted FMD and others didn't. I told him on the 'phone it was because we did not allow Defra vets onto our premises who in our view were carrying the disease around with them. He was taken aback and denied this could be the case. He said that he had been a TVI working for Defra. I immediately became alarmed...... - how could this "independent" survey still carry credence if it was to be carried out by the very people at the centre of the scandal?
He tried to support his point of view by citing an example from his experience. A farmer in the Longtown area had been strongly persuaded to get rid of his sheep under the 'voluntary' cull. 3 weeks later he put his cows onto the field where the sheep had been and the cows contracted FMD. He sought to persuade me that the virus had been latent in the sheep. I said that my interpretation was that his farm had been clean until Defra's people came onto it to take the sheep away in livestock wagons for slaughter.
The official was outraged and said "You have a very blinkered attitude" He then promptly, without any other warning, hung up. We did not hear from the Royal Society again and our views went unrecorded....." Read the farmer's complete email
March 24 ~ ".. ...vets were directly responsible for onward spread of Foot and Mouth."
Commenting on the report from Canada about the importation of live FMD virus to the National Centre for Foreign Animal
Disease in Winnipeg, and the rigorous disinfection procedures required during handling of the virus, Alan Beat writes (see in full) :
"We draw your attention to two points from this interesting report. First, the lack of clinical signs in deliberately infected sheep. Second, the disinfection procedure required:
The vets had to change into lab clothes... take two showers -- each one a mandatory three
minutes -- before they could leave the building. They were also required to
blow their noses, and soak their glasses in disinfectant for 20 minutes ....
Now think about the oft-repeated official claim that most new cases of FMD arose within 3 km of an existing IP - precisely the restriction zone within which vets were most active, visiting every farm repeatedly.
We certainly never saw disinfection of glasses, shower for three minutes - or a change of underwear.
If the Canadian procedures are really necessary, the conclusion can only be made that UK procedures were inadequate and that vets were directly responsible for onward spread of FMD." (The newspaper report can be read in full on the Inside Scotland site (external link)
March 24 ~ Relevant Expertise? "The composition of the (Science) Group evolved over time to ensure that relevant expertise was brought in, eg practising vets joined at a later stage to provide a more direct link with events on the ground. ..."
Parliamentary Question 64549 27 June 2001.
.
Foot and Mouth
Dr. Cable: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry which (a) individuals were consulted by and (b) companies were represented on the Foot and Mouth Science Group; and if she will make a statement. [64549]
Ms Hewitt [holding answer 26 June 2002]: Individuals on the FMD Science Group, and the Group itself, consulted at various points throughout the outbreak with a number of bodies, including farmers at regional meetings, the NFU, Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons, British Cattle Veterinary Association, British Veterinary Association, Sheep and Pigs Veterinary Associations and representatives of the food industry. All these meetings and consultations were reported back to the full Group.
The Group was comprised of (sic) individuals from a range of disciplines and included Government research scientists, university academics, veterinary practitioners and representatives of Government Departments and agencies. The composition of the Group evolved over time to ensure that relevant expertise was brought in, eg practising vets joined at a later stage to provide a more direct link with events on the ground."
Warmwell would have to take issue with the accuracy of the statement that "the composition of the Group evolved over time to ensure that relevant expertise was brought in" No one with relevant experience of the state of the art FMD vaccination was considered by the Science Group while it seems even the Pirbright voices - who did at least understand the behaviour of the strain of virus and the extreme difficulty of diagnosis in sheep - were largely ignored.
March 24 ~ Centralisation run riot during FMD - Parliamentary Question May 10 2001
Mr. Maclean: To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will state the ranks and job titles of the officials in Page street from whom temporary veterinary inspectors had to obtain authorisation that their diagnosis of foot and mouth was a confirmed case. [159451] Ms Quin [holding answer 27 April 2001]: On investigation for foot and mouth disease, a veterinary inspector in the field contacts a Veterinary Adviser at the Emergency Control Centre in Page street, London to discuss the individual case. The Veterinary Adviser will discuss the case with the Veterinary Manager of the Centre or a VA supervisor appointed by him. Centre managers are veterinary members of the senior civil service or unified grade 6. Veterinary Supervisors appointed by them are at veterinary grade 7 or equivalent. All these grades are staffed by experienced and qualified veterinary surgeons. The case is then either confirmed or negated on clinical grounds or the option of "slaughter on suspicion of disease" is followed. At the peak of the outbreak in late March/early April, in order to reduce delays in confirmation, those veterinary advisers who were experienced were given the authority to confirm or negate cases if need be without referral to the manager, though working under supervision. In practice about two thirds of the cases were still discussed before a decision was taken. As soon as the situation eased somewhat centre managers reverted to the standard process of confirmation of cases after discussion with a veterinary manager.
Unbelievable. Has the need for rationalisation and common sense been understood yet?"
March 24 ~ Sheep tagging: ". they are trying to turn us into a bloody factory,"
...some industry
leaders have warned they will simply refuse to comply with the regulation.
(Western Daily Press)
"...They include National Sheep Association chairman Peter Baber, from
Christow, near Exeter, who says the red tape could wipe out the entire
British sheep sector. The scale of the costs now suggests that is no
overstatement.
The estimates, allowing £12 an hour for labour plus on-costs, indicate
tagging and repeatedly checking sheep will cost a lowland farmer with 600
ewes £13,000 a year.
For an upland farmer dealing with sheep ranging free miles from the
farmhouse, the figure goes up to £16,000.
Yet the latest figures released by Defra this week show the average
lowland livestock farmer is only likely to earn £7,500 this year, and his
upland colleague - who receives more subsidies - just £10,000.
Exmoor sheep farmer Andrew Hawkins, who owns 1,000 ewes, says the
costs involved, coupled with the loss of some subsidies, will mean an end to
centuries of sheep farming on the moor.
"It is a total nonsense. One minute they are telling us they want more
natural farming systems, which is exactly what we are doing up here, and the
next they are trying to turn us into a bloody factory," he said.
March 24 - There are already so many pressures on our smaller abattoirs
that many, if they have not closed already, are facing closure
said the chairman of the FUW's Livestock Committee, Alan Gardner " The proposal to limit animal movements to and from markets to
94 miles also has serious implications. It is totally unrealistic,
inappropriate and detached from reality. There are already so many pressures on our smaller abattoirs
that many, if they have not closed already, are facing closure. DEFRA
appears to be doing their utmost to put every pressure on the industry and
their attitude beggars belief. We recognise there is a need to address various issues of
concern regarding livestock movements but these proposed measures are taking
the matter a step too far... " See report in Saturday's Western Mail (external link) Bio rules spell end for small markets
March 23 ~ 1. There are very real fears that Defra will implement killing on a major scale in the event of another outbreak of FMD, and will be able to do this in spite of the EU Draft Directive as it stands:
Important notes from Anne Lambourn to the MEPs voices the fears of those who have made a study of the UK policy on Foot and Mouth and fear that - in spite of everything - lessons simply have not been learned.
Her full submission may be read here
2. The Expert Group referred to in the Directive must actually be an expert group in FMD, and in all aspects of the disease, including mechanism of disease spread, and vaccination.
I feel that the Directive does not detail this carefully enough, although other parts of the Directive require specifically trained veterinarians. Individual countries (as shown so disastrously by the UK) cannot be relied upon to use the relevant experts...( More detail )
..
3. There is a very real fear that a government obsessed with image and spin will continue to refuse to acknowledge past mistakes, and thereby carry on with the same "successful policies" for FMD eradication (namely the contiguous and wider culling). ( More detail )
4. As the Directive stands, there is still the possiblity for political interference with the FMD control polices - these policies should be based on sound veterinary expertise, and proper scientific risk assessment.
There is no doubt in my mind that in the 2001 FMD epidemic, political factors overrode good science. In the report "FMD, Risk and Europe" by John Ryan, veterinary consultant on behalf of EUFMD, FAO, the necessity for clear scientific guidelines in a disease control strategy is emphasised: ( More detail )
5. The need for accurate diagnosis of every case before killing is essential for epidemiological, social/human, economic, and animal welfare purposes, as well as to prevent fraud. The technology is available. ( More detail )
6. Taking the initiative regarding vaccination:
I understand Mr Kreissl-Dorfler suggests that only the adjoining state (besides the Commission and the affected Member State) can take the initiative over implementing/requesting implementation of a vaccination strategy. I disagree with this for several reasons e.g. what state is adjoining to the UK? Does that mean that a member state with considerable veterinary expertise on FMD vaccination and with genuine concerns cannot ask that the UK implement a vaccination policy, simply because it is not adjoining? ( More detail )
I would be extremely grateful if you were able to raise my concerns in the meeting tomorrow.
Once again thank you for all your efforts on the Temporary Committee. They have been greatly appreciated."
March 23 ~ "..normal on-farm burial does not involve "a substantial quantity of animal burial.."
Sheep farmer Lawrence Wright has written to the Farmers Weekly Mayday fight for a fair deal on fallen stock. ".. It seems absurd to ban the on-farm burial of fallen stock and unreasonable to do so without a safe, practical and affordable alternative. Lord Whitty has agreed in parliament [19th March] that the burial of fallen stock on farm has been going on for at least two millennia. He stated that it must now be banned because "it presents environmental problems for watercourses and in terms of animal disease, which is why the European legislation was introduced."
What has changed recently to make this a danger to watercourses and "in terms of" animal disease so significant that it must be banned?
When questioned on these points he referred to "the type of seepage about which we are concerned that occurs when there is a substantial quantity of animal burial." But normal on-farm burial does not involve "a substantial quantity of animal burial": particularly not on farms with low stocking rates..... Will we next be required to follow our animals with poop-a-scoops and collect up the dung for transport to a central disposal plant too?
...... The transport of fallen stock, farm to farm will tend to increase rather than decrease the risk of spreading disease, consume more fossil fuels and risk offensive sights and smells being inflicted on the public. The concentration of the corpses at the collection points will ensure that there will be problems of "seepage" and smell. .....
I suggest that a derogation should be made for farms with closed flocks and low stocking rates: and that the ban should not be imposed on any farm without the provision of arrangements which are workable and inexpensive.
See the full letter
March 23 ~ Scrapie bolus chokes hoggs
From Scottish Farmer
"Blackface Ewe hoggs at Ian Hunters Dalchirla Farm, Muthill, Crieff, were used to make up numbers for NSP (National Scrapie Plan) testing. Two very nearly choked to death on the bolus and may have suffered long term damage--both hoggs were completely unconscious and had to be hung upside down to try to get the boluses out.
Mr Hunter questioned why boluses were used on hoggs when female sheep only have to be ear tagged to enter the scheme.
NSP apologised profusely. To date out of 350,000 male sheep tested 85 have choked to death." (Warmwell note: Using a bolus is the second stage of scrapie testing, after the blood test, when an electronic identity number is put into the rumen of the animal. It's about the size of a shotgun cartridge and they use a sort of gun-like thing to shoot it into the back of the throat where the sheep swallows convulsively. If correctly swallowed the number can be read from inside the rumen with a scanner. It is supposed to stop any cheating; the blood sample refers to the right animal. Expensive, tricky and absolutely daft because sometimes they are an inappropriate size and simply choke the poor animals.)
March 22 ~ "no comfort whatsoever"
North Devon Journal ".... Shebbear farmer Ted Haste lost 189 pedigree cattle in the outbreak and
is still battling two years on for compensation for £30,000 worth of damage
he said was caused on his farm by those who carried out the cull.
Speaking as a new report into handling of the outbreak revealed
"inexcusable" errors, Mr Haste said it gave him "no comfort whatsoever"
about the handling of future incidents.
He said: "Illegally imported meat is still coming in and while it
does, the threat of another outbreak is hanging over every farmer in the
country."
Other North Devon critics said the new report by the Commons Public
Accounts Committee (see report here on warmwell) failed to show the way forward or any lessons learned...."
An emailer comments, "This makes me really sad. That so many liars
could mislead so many honest people. I have no doubt that they will go to
their graves believing it was imported meat. The idea that governments
abroad know more than our own people really annoys me. Only four countries
worldwide, according to industry reports, will take British pig semen. They
think FMD was brought in by semen - so do I."
We simply don't know - but the reluctance of the UK government to address the mystery of the origin of the UK FMD outbreak does seem very strange.
March 22 ~ "Any failure to have the system fully in place as of 1st May rests very much with the farming organisations"
Lord Whitty in the debate on 19th March.
Lord Livsey of Talgarth asked Her Majesty's Government:
Whether they will place a moratorium on the European Union animal by-products regulation relating to the disposal of animal carcasses until such time as adequate collection and disposal facilities are in place and accessible to the farming community.
Lord Whitty answered:
"My Lords, farm burial has been a feature of farming for longer than I can remember-two millennia is almost certainly correct. However, it presents environmental problems for watercourses and in terms of animal disease, which is why the European legislation was introduced. The animal by-products regulation will apply from 1st May. As I indicated the other day in response to a different Question, the Government have been trying since last April to discuss the issue with the industry in order to try to establish a system of collection and disposal. The capacity is there, as I said in my initial Answer, but the industry is reluctant to put any of its own resources into providing that disposal system. So any failure to have a fully operational system as from 1st May lies at the door of the industry, not the Government."
Lord Lloyd of Berwick asked: "My Lords, why is it permissible for human beings to be buried but not animals?"
Lord Whitty: "My Lords, by and large, human beings are buried in coffins and in land that has been limed. That prevents the type of seepage about which we are concerned that occurs when there is a substantial quantity of animal burial. If the same precautions had to be taken for animal burial as for human burial, the cost to farmers would be considerably greater than that required by the directive."
See more
March 22 ~ farm has read the report carefully and stands by all the points raised in the original critique.
farm's response to Broom's Barn comments on our press release and exposé of the research station's exaggerated claims for GM sugar beet cost savings to farmers:
'Economic consequences for UK farmers of growing GM herbicide tolerant sugar beet, M J May, Broom's Barn Research Station, 2003-03-21
Farmers are sadly only too familiar with reading research findings that bear little relation to the real costs and practicalities of farming.
The exaggerated claims of the Broom's Barn research could be shrugged off as simply another in a long-line of similar academic work that bears little relation to the real costs, or real benefits, to real farmers with real crops. However, as this research has gone forward to the Government's Strategy Unit, which is conducting a consultation into the costs and benefits of GM crops, and therefore, could influence the Government's assessment of GM crops - we cannot let its assertions go unchallenged.
Broom's Barn opens its commentary on our critique by urging us to read their research 'carefully'. farm has read the report carefully and stands by all the points raised in the original critique." Read farm's comments
March 22 ~ "Monsanto & Cargill employees attempts to skew farm poll on GM"
farm the new campaigning and membership group for working farmers and the public has discovered that employees of biotech. and agribusiness giants, Monsanto and Cargill have been seeking to exert undue influence over its website poll on GM crops.
"Following Environment Minister, Michael Meacher's statement reported in the March issue of The Ecologist magazine,
We have been feeding ourselves perfectly adequately, since overcoming problems of hunger in our early existence. GM is not necessary,'
farm put up the poll on its website asking the question,
Do you agree with Michael Meacher's comments that GM crops are not necessary?'
For the first few days, responses to the poll averaged out at about 90% agreeing with Mr Meacher, 10% disagreeing. Latterly, opinion shifted gradually a little more against him - with around 82% agreeing, 18% disagreeing Then - wham! - in the space of a day, responses to the poll lurched violently away from the Minister, reducing from
80% to 60% to just over 50%........At time of closing the poll, 236 people had voted
157 agreed with Mr Meacher. 79 disagreed
We traced 57 of those 79, back to Cargill and Monsanto, evenly split between the two.
Therefore, 22 No' votes came from other sources than these two agribusiness GM enthusiasts...."
Read press release
March 21 ~ That such (rapid diagnostic) tests have yet to be fully validated by the OIE, several years after their initial development, is an international disgrace that demands immediate political action.
Alan Beat has kindly sent us his comments on the EU Draft Directive "Modern rapid diagnostics (such as penside PCR tests) have removed all need for pre-emptive slaughter, a relic of the nineteenth century that should now be consigned to history. Rapid field testing in the vicinity of outbreaks, under virus plumes etc. will accurately identify any infected animals for targeted slaughter, while avoiding the counter-productive pre-emptive killing of uninfected stock.
That such tests have yet to be fully validated by the OIE, several years after their initial development, is an international disgrace that demands immediate political action.
There should be NO pre-emptive slaughter permitted under the new Directive.
There are well-established techniques for predicting the extent and scale of an outbreak as soon as initial data from "first day incidence" is available (see references below). The decision to vaccinate or slaughter must be made at the very beginning of an outbreak if control is to be optimised. The use of the phrase "in exceptional severe cases" is not acceptable in this Directive and has no place in a decision process based on scientific, economic, social and animal welfare criteria. "
March 21 ~ "it can be abused to enforce massive pre-emptive slaughter without scientific or economic justification..."
In particular, Alan Beat feels, as we do, that Article 35 ("...Member States may take additional national measures which are deemed necessary and proportionate ...") is a political loophole. He says., " it can be abused to enforce massive pre-emptive slaughter without scientific or economic justification, precisely as happened in the UK during 2001"
The Expert Group - the Directive should "specify an appropriate range and balance of scientific disciplines to be represented within the expert group of each Member State."
As for Annexe X, he says"...there is no scientific basis whatever on which to base a 48-hour pre-emptive slaughter target. This notional target, introduced for the first time during the UK epidemic of 2001 was never intended to be more than an easily understood objective in a crisis situation. .... The decision should instead be based upon the scientifically established criteria of first-day incidence data; and if vaccination is then chosen as the most effective policy, it MUST be deployed as early in the outbreak as possible...."
Those who were personally affected by the FMD crisis will be pleased to see: "A central lesson to be learned from the 2001 epidemic was that in future, the serious and inevitable social and psychological impact of large-scale slaughter should be avoided. Such a criteria argues in favour of vaccination.
And missing from the table of criteria altogether is
Impact of control policy on the wider economy; which argues in favour of vaccination..."
We are very grateful for this thorough, expert view from Mr Beat and hope his comments will be most seriously considered by those who will make the final amendments to the Directive.
March 21 ~ DEFRA has stated that from May 1st the on-farm burial of stock
will be banned. What then?
asks the Countryside Alliance "Apart from the free or heavily
subsidized service offered by hunts in many areas (who pick up
more than 400,000 dead animals from farms every year) DEFRA has
yet to launch a workable and fair carcass collection scheme.
The irony does not go unnoticed that, if asked, the Local Authority
or Ministry (DEFRA) Office will advise contacting the local
hunt kennels. ...."
The Farmers Weekly has launched a campaign 'Mayday for Fallen Stock'
with three aims:-
- DEFRA should appeal for a derogation of the April 30th deadline
in order to plan the introduction of a fair and workable scheme.
- DEFRA should provide state funding for a national collection
service in line with other EU countries.
- DEFRA should enforce strict biosecurity measures to ensure a
national collection scheme does not jeopardize human or animal health.
Please email your views to farmers.weekly@rbi.co.uk
or fax 0208 652 4005.
All comments will be sent by Farmers Weekly directly to
DEFRA junior minister Elliot Morley." Read more
March 21 ~ "...little to clarify
long-term confusion..
Fordyce Maxwell in today's Scotsman:
"... It now seems that on-farm burial will be allowed to continue in
Scotland until 15 May and the consultation announcement by Ross Finnie,
minister for environment and rural development, does little to clarify
long-term confusion.
On a UK scale, the number of animals that die by accident or injury or
soon after birth is estimated at 1.3 million adults and well over two
million lambs, calves and piglets. ..."
March 21 ~ Removal of OTM 'makes you think'
says Jeff Swift in the Westmorland Gazette
".....The reason for their removal from the food chain was to guard against catching CJD or VCJD from eating beef that may possibly have come from an animal that had BSE. That is the view of one group of scientists. The aim was unquestionably a worthy one because CJD is a most tragic disease and we must never forget that.
It has to be said, however, that although their aim was worthy, that does not mean they were right in their conclusions. In the view of many people, scientists among them, BSE did not come from cattle eating animal feed that contained meat and bone meal. ....
Far cleverer people than me subscribe to the theory that BSE came from OP and a strain of manganese that can upset the balance of trace elements. If this is ever proved beyond doubt, would not some people in high places be for the high jump? I'm saying nowt, but it makes you think.
Removing over 30 month beef has been expensive and also very wasteful....
There is one worry about lifting the OTM rule and that is if it were done suddenly, without thought.....
The lifting must be well thought out and phased in gradually. " (full article)
March 20 ~ Silence Of The Lambs nominated for award
See report. The television series that documented the full horror of life in the Dales during and after the foot and mouth crisis has been nominated for an award by the Royal Television Society.
"Silence Of The Lambs", made by Grassington's Cheeky Monkey Films, has been shortlisted as the best regional television programme. It was broadcast on Yorkshire TV last year.
March 20 ~ GM crops: "Consents are granted by an EU-wide process, and the UK is bound by
that decision"
Fordyce Maxwell today reminds us that the UK government has no power to ban a GM crop approved by the European
Commission."...As well as the Scottish Executive report last week defending GM trials, Franz Fischler, European commissioner for agriculture, announced that "no form of agriculture must be excluded from the EU".
That was interpreted, both by pro- and anti-GM groups as a green light for the new technology, which is now common in a number of countries - about 100 million acres of GM crops are being grown - but has been resisted in Europe.
Refusal by the European Union to allow commercial GM crops would continue to cause problems in World Trade Organisation talks, with America claiming the ban was simply a way of restricting US imports.
Friends of the Earth says that Fischler's apparent wish to allow farmers who wish to grow GM crops to grow them, would be a "licence to pollute the food and farming environment" and cause chaos in the countryside.
Legal liability if contamination of non-GM crops takes place will also be a massive issue, say anti-GM groups...."
Brussels will have final say on GM crops. In effect, any decision
made in Scotland, Wales or England will be irrelevant.
March 20 ~
A £2 MILLION foot-and-mouth crisis centre is being built in Dumfries.
Dumfries and Galloway Standard (external link)
" ..
Scotland's first emergency centre for the disease.
"... with the capability to process 40,000 animal blood tests a week the new
site could prove essential in stopping future outbreaks.
Site manager Dr Richard Laven ... said: " ...This centre will provide
Dumfries and Galloway, as well as the rest of Scotland, with an essential
blood testing service....During the foot-and-mouth outbreak testing was carried out in Surrey which
created a huge backlog that led to serious problems.....building work is expected to be completed by
January 2004.
..... in the event of an outbreak the centre can be transformed into a
emergency facility within a week and we could be blood testing up to 40,000
animals a week...."
The backlog of tests at Pirbright in Surrey, overwhelmed because offers to help from capable scientists such as Colin Fink at Warwick had been repulsed, was one reason why farmers were told their animals were to be killed without benefit of blood test. In Dumfries and Galloway the scale of slaughter of healthy animals was breathtaking. Roger Windsor spoke of the "scorched earth policy" of mass slaughter, that was carried out "without rhyme or reason".
In Wigtownshire there were only 2 positive results among those tested, yet nearly 90,000 animals killed.
The Earl of Dalkeith wrote to the Times in April 2001 and spoke for many"....Above all, it seems astonishing that, nine weeks after the nearest local outbreak, the Executive should still strike at an apparently healthy flock.
Our view that no cull was necessary, as endorsed by distinguished scientists, met with prickly disdain. Pleas for blood testing and reminders of the rarity of the hefted South Country Cheviots fell on stony ground. ....
I am saddened that the prosecution of a policy that many have supported in principle has become so robotic, so insensitive to actual experience, so deaf to alternative scientific thinking...."
Alternative scientific thinking, however eminent, was not listened to. Evidence at the Scottish Parliament
Rural Development Committee in April 2001
ensured that vaccination was not considered. Professor Woolhouse, for example, said: "If herds are allowed to remain in an area where the disease is active, whether they are vaccinated or not, neighbouring herds are put at risk." But scientists with first hand knowledge of successful vaccination campaigns, such as Paul Sutmoller and Simon Barteling say categorically:"Billions of animals have been successfully vaccinated. There is a strong indication that though you may find carriers they do not pass it on."
March 20 ~ The Water Framework Directive offers the potential of enormous environmental and social benefits,
says the EFRA Committee in its report (external link), "but at the same time it will dramatically affect the ways in which farming, industries and others conduct their activities. .... the Directive needs much greater public promotion. We hope that all parties affected by the Directive, as well as the media, will now recognise the significance of the Directive, and begin to give it the attention and discussion it deserves, and that the Government gives a much clearer lead about its implications, techniques and costs of implementation.
.... Its objective is environmental improvement, and it will also have a significant socio-economic effect.....
Implementation of the Directive requires a great deal of scientific work to be done, as well as administrative structures to be put in place to bring together all of those affected. A 'joined-up' strategy is required. Yet the Government does not seem to be seized of the urgency of the task. Thus as well as making specific recommendations throughout the Report, our most urgent plea is that the Government adopt a more positive, and more active, approach to the Directive.
The Water Framework Directive offers the chance to giving real meaning to the nebulous concept of 'sustainable development'. We urge the Government to take it."
Overview of the EU Water Framework Directive updated March 2003
March 19 ~ EU FMD Directive discussed yesterday by MEPs
The timetable is now very short:
Yesterday (18th March) the Agriculture Committee discussed Kreissl-Dörfler's draft report.
The deadline for tabling amendments to Kreissl-Dorfler's draft report is 26 March
On 26 April the Agriculture Committee will vote on the amendments.
On 22 April the Environment Committee will vote on the amendments to Mr Phillip Whitehead's draft report. The deadline for tabling amendments to Whitehead's draft report will be towards the end of March.
The plenary vote is scheduled for the first week of June.
Any interested party who has not been able to see the draft reports is invited to contact warmwell for information.
March 19 ~ health
and safety regulations costs close another abattoir....
"...G Bush and Son, of Upper Staithe Road in Stalham, which employs more than 20
staff, is one of the few remaining multi-species abattoirs in the country.
But now the grandson of the firm's founder has decided it is too expensive
to carry on and will now be just a cutting plant and meat depot." (EDP24.com- external link)
March 19 ~ Seeds of doubt over GM - Letters in the Guardian from Gene Watch and Baroness Miller
From Dr Sue Mayer
GeneWatch UK
Margaret Beckett (Letters, March 17) misunderstands both the issues at stake and the European process for licensing the marketing of GM crops. It is not whether crops are grown commercially before the public debate starts that is under question (no one has suggested this is possible), but whether decisions will be taken about future marketing and growing before the debate is finished.
The UK's position on the 18 proposals to be considered in Europe should be informed by the outcome of the forthcoming public debate. Unless the UK delays assessment of these applications or seeks our exclusion from the area covered the debate becomes a spurious exercise, as the Scottish executive and Welsh assembly have recognised. All the proposals will be considered by the UK (there is no "ours" or "theirs" as Mrs Beckett suggests - one member state leads but all particpate in the final decision) and several could allow GM crops to be grown here. They are all revised applications under the new directive - that they had been submitted under the previous directive is irrelevant. Unless the environment secretary recognises the significance of these decisions and the UK's role in them, all confidence that the government will behave impartially will evaporate.
Dr Sue Mayer
GeneWatch UK
sue.mayer@genewatch.org
From Baroness Miller spokesman on the environment in the House of Lords
Margaret Beckett says there is no intention to authorise commercial growing of GM crops in the UK before the public debate is "under way". Why not before it is concluded? Given her comments we need to know the purpose of the government-instigated debate. And everyone intending to take part needs to know how their opinions will be evaluated and what effect they will have on policy.
Sue Miller
Lib Dem Lords environment spokeswoman
March 18/19 ~ farm exposes fundamental inaccuracies
among claims for GM
crops
"Recent findings published by the Broom's Barn Research Station (pdf file) have
enthusiastically suggested vast savings for farmers growing Genetically Modified
Herbicide Tolerant (GMHT) crops.
Not surprisingly, cost savings such as these claimed by
Brooms' Barns make attractive reading to hard-pressed farmers looking to
reduce growing costs and develop new biofuel markets.
farm has taken a closer look at the figures used in the research and found that
the greatest proportion bear little or no relation to normal farming practice.
Although the report has apparently been peer-reviewed before being published
by the Association of Applied Biologists, it contains fundamental inaccuracies
that question its scientific validity and raise concerns more widely as to the
independence and objectivity of other papers making similar claims for GM
crops."
See also farm's press release
The National Farmers' Union is preparing to "consult members" to establish what its policy should be on genetically modified crops. It is to be hoped they will read this
exposé by farm on the exaggerated claims of GM research.
March 18/19 ~ Are consumers being misled by the little red tractor logo?
More and more shoppers for meat are aware of animal welfare and want their anxieties removed before buying animal products.
Compassion in World Farming (external link) has said claims that animals reared under the Little Red Tractor scheme are treated humanely are "insidious".
In its promotional material the British Food Standard implies that food produced to its standard is: food you can trust, kind to animals, caring to the environment and independently checked.
It claims that its standard is a "promise to consumers that, when they buy food carrying the British Farm Standard mark on the label, it has been produced to meet exacting food safety, environmental and welfare standards".
Well, let's put the animal welfare claim to the test. Against the CIWF 15 Animal Welfare Measures we examined each standard to see if they did anything other than the statutory minimum. It wasn't a pretty picture. ...
"We are considering making a complaint to the Advertising Standards Authority about the scheme's wild claims".
A CIWF investigation into a broiler chicken farm, approved by the NFU scheme, was shown in last week's BBC Food Police programme.
March 18 ~ "You need to get people working with the virus so they won't be frightened of the damn thing,"
"Front-line workers need to be able to work comfortably with the virus and be able to say, 'Yes, I can do the diagnosis and provide the diagnostic support for the agricultural community.' "
Canada - thanks to Paul Kitching and others - now has live foot and mouth virus for research at the National Centre for Foreign Animal Disease in Winnipeg. Canada's National Post reports : extract
For Dr. Kitching, the virus is an old foe. ... he watched in dismay as the virus -- and the panic it created -- took hold in the United Kingdom in 2001.
The outbreak was devastating both to British agriculture and tourism.... animals were needlessly slaughtered because the British government was given bad advice from computer modellers who said the cull had to continue long after the virus had stopped spreading, says Dr. Kitching, who hopes North America will learn from the British disaster...."
It is very likely that both North America and the USA will learn a great deal from our tragedy. It pains us that numbers of sacrificed animals is so widely misreported but we are very pleased to learn that the welfare of the animals experimentally infected is a prime concern in Winnipeg. It is reassuring to learn that Dr Kitching's expertise and influence is so respected on the other side of the Atlantic. When it really mattered, his expertise here was not. He was consulted by the Government on how best to tackle the outbreak. When he was critical of the scientific modelling which backed up the mass cull - or contiguous - policy, his concerns were rejected. He told Professor King's committee that the computer models used to develop the policy were based on faulty data."While some were prepared to listen, this was not what the committee wanted to hear. Others were less receptive and considered me a bit of a Neanderthal for not appreciating models, and questioned whether I even went on an aeroplane because someone as primitive as myself wouldn't trust an aeroplane...."
March 17 ~ The only effective defence against such politicking is sound science, hard information, good communication and good emergency preparation where these issues have already been discussed with key stakeholders.
From FMD, Risk and Europe
a paper written for the December 2001 Brussels FMD conference by
John Ryan, veterinary consultant
on behalf of
EUFMD, FAO. This conference was, of course, attended by key members of DEFRA.
"...
Control of FMD is not a technical challenge - many countries controlled and eradicated FMD in the first half of this century with pre-war technology - it is a resource management challenge,
- it is a public relations challenge,
- it is an information management challenge,
- it is an endurance challenge,
- but most importantly, it is a challenge to a country's emergency preparedness and the Key Decisions that determine the impact of FMD have already been taken long before the virus enters the country....
In contrast, the Key Decisions taken after the outbreak starts are essentially tactical decisions
(e.g. whether to vaccinate or not? When & where to vaccinate? What preventive culling strategy to use? etc.) and these decisions are largely constrained by what is organisationally possible given the level of emergency preparedness. After an outbreak starts, these decisions are extremely difficult to make because information on the spread of the virus is always at least one incubation period (some commentators use a rule of thumb of 14 days) behind reality and the information has to be gathered and processed and presented in a useable format for decision makers.
The uncertainty around such difficult decisions leaves gaps for political exploitation and sub-optimal decision-making. The only effective defence against such politicking is sound science, hard information, good communication and good emergency preparation where these issues have already been discussed with key stakeholders..." See more of this paper and its recommendations
March 17 ~" to lay the blame for such bribery at the door of those farmers who were eventually forced into submission is a complete reversal of the truth"
Alan Beat writes in his editorial to this week's newsletter for smallholders.org : "Most .. will have seen media coverage given to the damning report of the Public Accounts Committee into the FMD crisis of 2001. The greedy farmers are once again given a public bashing for irresponsibly spreading disease and for the excessive amounts of compensation they received. Certainly there were examples of farmers taking advantage of the system - but that is human nature, and the fault lies squarely with the system that creates such opportunities.
But no report that we have seen has even mentioned the driving force behind the rapid rise in compensation payments as the epidemic progressed - namely that this was a deliberate policy, agreed between the government and NFU, to sweeten the bitter pill of unjustified mass slaughter for an increasingly disillusioned farming community. To give just one example, in the Brecon Beacons the payments offered for hill ewes progressively rose to such a ridiculous level that farmers resisting the cull of their hefted flocks, and deprived of any income at all for several long months by movement restrictions, eventually had no financial choice but to take the blood money. This was bribery and coercion by the government to prop up a control policy that no-one believed in - and to lay the blame for such bribery at the door of those farmers who were eventually forced into submission is a complete reversal of the truth."
March 17 ~ Not worthy of Geoffrey Lean?
An emailer who, like ourselves and Alan Beat above, has followed the sorry saga of the handling of Foot and Mouth from the beginning, writes, " Geoffrey Lean in the Independent (external link) reviews findings of the Public Accounts Committee. Some good points, but some that are I think not worthy of him - for example, the opening sentence:
"Britain's tourism industry suffered nine times more severely than agriculture from the foot and mouth crisis, partly because farmers ripped off taxpayers, a parliamentary inquiry has concluded."
Another statement is interesting:
"It (the Report) concludes that the countryside should not have been closed, that carcasses should not have been burnt on mass pyres, and that there should have been a policy for vaccinating animals against the disease - all issues raised by this newspaper, virtually alone, at the time."
The emailer
comments: "originally the Anderson team said it was the great plumes of airborne virus that had contaminated premises within 3 km, and that was (and still is) the justification/scientific basis for slaughtering out those premises. This lent support to Scudamore's statement to the Cumbrian farmers before Great Orton mass slaughter that all the flocks were heavily infected - in fact there were 9 antibody positive out of just under half a million."
March 17 ~ "If the Inquiry accepts the "farmer spread" argument, then surely that indicates they do not accept that airborne spread was responsible.."
(contiues the email )".. thereby showing that the Anderson team theory was wrong - and of course that the models were flawed, being based on incorrect science. As I see it they cannot have it both ways. The scientific expertise of Anderson et al ought to be subjected to the further rigorous scrutiny that it deserves.
Also, is the following statement fair? (see bit in bold)
"The inquiry reports that in 78% of the cases, the disease 'resulted from local spread between premises within 3 km of each other'. Much of this was caused by farmers failing to take simple hygiene precautions."
We agree with both Alan Beat and this respected emailer that it is not fair - and are sad to see another highly provocative sentence in Mr Lean's article which simply cannot be justified from the actual PAC report: "farmers - whose negligence, the committee's report says, was largely responsible for spreading the disease" from an admired journalist who has indeed helped to publicise at least some of the tragedy of FMD 2001 (See Geoffrey Lean's other articles among the best press selection) In fact, hope of a proper investigation into what has been called "local spread" now seems to have faded away. DEFRA is likely to be relieved to see farmers blamed (again) in the press for what many others know was negligence and irresponsibility about hygiene - but not on the part of the farmers.
March 17 ~ "Now, even DEFRA must realise that mass slaughter is no longer an option, though they are loathe to admit it."
Lord Moran has written an anniversary article for Country Illustrated: ANIMAL HEALTH ACT - Lest we forget
"Forced through Parliament, against wisdom and advice, the so-called 'Animal Death Bill' (now law) will have a brief life after all. The European Union will see to that."
March 16 ~ "That's bad for Democracy itself"
"Still Hiding Behind the Secrets and Lies" was the unequivocal headline in the Western Morning News on Friday:
"The catalogue of official criticism levelled at the Government for its incompetent handling of the foot and mouth crisis grows larger, almost by the month. The latest report into the way the fight against the £8 billion rural disaster was managed concludes that the now disbanded Ministry of Agriculture was guilty of a "serious misjudgement" ...(but).. the overall impact of the Commons Public Accounts Committee findings barely scratches the surface of the magnitude of mismanagement, neglect and cover-up that characterised the Government's entire response to the foot and mouth disaster.
....
As far as New Labour is concerned, foot and mouth is dead and buried; the blundering, bungling and cover-ups that went on are old news.....the true scale of the secrets, lies, deceit and errors surrounding the handling of the foot and mouth crisis will never be known. All the inquiries that were held have been either restricted by the sphere of interest of the committee involved, like this one which concentrates only on the financial implications, or hamstrung by a lack of real teeth and proper access to those who made all the fateful decisions.
..... Being accused of making a "serious misjudgement" over a crisis that passed more than two years ago holds little terror for Ministers, particularly when the department coming in for the attack has long since been wound up.... The timing of this report - on the eve of a war with Iraq - virtually guarantees it will be buried... as has so much about the Government's desperately flawed conduct, throughout the disaster.
Yet there are serious lessons to be learned from these diluted findings, and worrying indications that little heed is being paid to them, just as the lessons following the 1967/68 foot and mouth outbreak were ignored with catastrophic results. Worst of all, the politicians who made, at best, crass errors of judgement and, at worst, calculated political decisions which destroyed people's lives, are getting off scot-free. And that's bad for democracy itself."
March 16 ~ ".. the minister who presented that shamefully-inadequate contingency plan for approval by the European Commission in 1992 was none other than John Selwyn Gummer, "Our Country Crusader"..."
From Booker's Notebook in the Sunday Telegraph today
".....what had aroused the ire of the "Country
Crusader" was an article in this newspaper on February 16 by Oliver Walston,
a farmer. This trenchantly made the point that, thanks not least to Mr
Gill's closeness to Government, the NFU had consistently failed to represent
the interests of farmers through the worst years British agriculture has
ever faced.
Mr Walston went on to echo what almost every farmer knows, that
there is something seriously amiss with the strangely undemocratic system by
which Mr Gill and the NFU hierarchy manage to perpetuate their hold on
office, so that they can be described by the media as "farmers' leaders"
when their organisation represents only one third of the farmers in this
country.
...... "Agromenes" is none other than John Selwyn Gummer, who as Minister
of Agriculture between 1989 and 1993 was responsible for an endless
succession of disasters for Britain's countryside.
Week after week in those years I exposed the sanctimonious way
in which Mr Gummer was enthusiastically presiding over the wholesale
destruction of our abattoirs, small egg-producers, beekeepers, fishermen and
heaven knows what else. It was he who introduced the greatest avalanche of
bureaucracy and paperwork that farming has ever known, as part of the
"reform" of the Common Agricultural Policy. It was he, more than any other
minister, who endorsed the cover-up of the fearful damage inflicted on
thousands of sheep farmers, after his ministry had compelled them to use
highly-dangerous organo-phosphorus sheep dips.
It might seem strangely timely that Mr Gummer's vengeful pseudonymous outburst against The Sunday Telegraph should coincide with the publication this month of an excoriatory report by the Public Accounts Committee on the present Government's mishandling of the 2001 foot and mouth crisis. Ben Gill and the NFU played their full part in that, by acting as cheerleaders for the Government's illegal "pre-emptive cull" policy and as opponents of a vaccination programme that might have saved nine million healthy animals from destruction. But the MPs, under the chairmanship of Edward Leigh, picked up in particular a point repeatedly made in this column (and by no other newspaper), that the most serious failing of all was the total inadequacy of the Government's contingency plan.
This is curiously apt, because the minister who presented that shamefully-inadequate contingency plan for approval by the European Commission in 1992 was none other than John Selwyn Gummer, "Our Country Crusader"....."
March 14 ~ "The contiguous cull was controversial because it involved the slaughter of millions of apparently healthy animals."
From the Public Accounts Committee report into the handling of the Foot and Mouth crisis
"...The Department should examine how the contiguous cull was implemented in 2001 and assess its impact and effectiveness, to inform decisions as to whether, and how, a contiguous cull should be used in the event of any future outbreak."
We are interested to read this terse recommendation - included in spite of the 155 paragraphs from DEFRA in its evidence: Supplementary memorandum submitted by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs in which it attempts to answer some of the trickier and more damning questions put to it by the Committee. Example: Questions 43, and 258-261: The basis for the contiguous culls, particularly in light of the evidence of Dr Donaldson of the Institute of Animal Health in Pirbright to the EU inquiry where he said that there was no justification. What I want to hear and see there is why he is wrong. Why Professor Roy Anderson in his article in Nature in October 2001 was wrong when he said there were significant biases in the DEFRA contact tracing process. Next, the legal basis for the contiguous culling. There are four parts to that. First the basis in statute law, presumably the Animal Health Act 1981. I have read it and I cannot see a basis but perhaps you could point one out to me. Second, in case law. Here I should like you to examine any cases which are deemed relevant but including a mention please of the West Hall and Linslade cases, and particularly in the light of those two cases an analysis of the scientific evidence which was not available to the court in those cases.... Third, the MAFF versus Upton case, the first case people think was based on full scientific evidence. The point I want you to address here is why it was that after the MAFF versus Upton case, the Government did not seek to test the legality of contiguous culling any further. Fourth, in relation to legal advice, all the legal advice received....Particularly therefore the analysis of the slaughter powers in the new Animal Health Bill. If you had the powers already, why was there a new Animal Health Bill with new slaughter powers?
DEFRA's answer is predictable from all that we have read and heard before. The Ministry seems particularly to chafe at the Maff v. Upton judgement.
March 14 ~ "Emergency vaccination was not used during the 2001 outbreak."
"The Government has announced that the option of vaccination would nevertheless form part of any future strategy for the control of foot and mouth disease. We cannot have a situation again where there is no clear-cut policy on whether and when vaccination is used. The Department's plans on vaccination should be clear and set out the circumstances and factors that would determine when vaccination would be adopted. The plans should be made known and explained to all relevant parties, including farmers, vets, and representatives of the food industry. " From the Public Accounts Committee report into the handling of the Foot and Mouth crisis
March 14 ~ "Seven mass burial pits were constructed at significant expense..."
".. during the crisis to meet a worst case prediction of the number of animals that might need to be slaughtered. They were used to only one-third of their capacity and their long-term future has yet to be decided. The Department needs to formulate plans for the future of each site, and consult local authorities and residents on its proposals. Continued close monitoring and inspection of the sites in particular is essential. " (See the other main recommendations)
March 14 ~ "Some of the disease's handling remain inexcusable, such as the absence of a vaccination policy..."
See Robert Uhlig's report in today's TelegraphEdward Leigh, chairman of the public accounts committee, said that while he recognised the Government faced a "crisis situation and decisions had to be taken immediately", ministers and officials made serious mistakes.
"Some of the disease's handling remain inexcusable, such as the absence of a vaccination policy and the failure to bring in the military at an earlier stage," he said.
The report said the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Maff) was guilty of a "serious misjudgment" in assuming that the risks of an outbreak were low, and consequently failing to plan for the scale of problems it faced.
It said that many of the Government's difficulties in handling the epidemic "reflect a narrow outlook and lack of contextual awareness".
Mr Leigh called for the Government's plans on vaccination to "be clear, and set out the circumstances and factors that would determine when vaccination would be adopted".
MPs noted that Maff failed to act sufficiently on(*) a report that pointed out the Government's unpreparedness...."
* See Drummond Report
The full 25 page report of the Public Accounts Committee can be seen later today on www.parliament.uk
(We note the spin put on this story by the Guardian, whose headline reads "Greedy farmers blamed for huge tax bill" (external link) Odd, since far from blaming the farming community which suffered so traumatically, the report actually blames the Ministry.
The Norfolk news site, EDP24, which lists the main findings of the report, quotes South Norfolk MP Richard Bacon, a committee member: "The
foot-and-mouth crisis was extremely traumatic and costly for the farming
community and for many related industries in the countryside - especially,
but not only, tourism. It also led to a shameful waste of taxpayers' money.
"I hope very much that lessons will be learnt from the foot-and-mouth
crisis " ....."
March 14 ~ David Lidington: "plans to use vaccination to help control a new outbreak are at best sketchy"
Commenting on the Foot and Mouth Report published by the Public Accounts Committee, David Lidington, Shadow Secretary of State, Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, said:
"This is a devastating indictment of the Government's negligence and incompetence.
"Contingency planning was inadequate. The Army was brought in too late. A livestock movement ban could and should have been brought in on day one, as happened in the Netherlands.
"What is so worrying now is the lack of action to guard against a future epidemic.
.......Plans to use vaccination to help control a new outbreak are at best sketchy."
March 14 ~ Ash Moor Pit back in the news as DEFRA plans to sell the land on the open market
The Times reported yesterday under the headline: £30m bill for empty foot and mouth pit(external link)
"that..."Three of the pits, each the size of a football field, were given an impermeable lining at a cost of at least £7.5 million. Opponents of the scheme claim that the entire project, including £10,000 a week spent on security guards and the £1 million cost of filling it in, will land the taxpayer with a bill of about £30 million.
People living near the pits are angry that the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, which is responsible for the site, plans to sell the land on the open market instead of giving it to the public as a nature reserve."
In December 2001 John Burnett MP made the following comments in the House of Commons (which we reported in our page on the real costs of the crisis):" Far from being impervious, the land below the site at Ash moor is extremely porous. .... if the site were ever brought into use and however many pumps were available, one flash flood would cause thousands of gallons of pernicious effluent to flood the valley and poison the water supplies of many thousands of people.
.....I estimate that the cost of the site--a white elephant--is currently in the region of £10 million. In addition, the weekly cost of monitoring and keeping the site is £20,000 a week, or more than £1 million a year just for upkeep.
.......Ash moor has been and continues to be a vast waste of public money. I hope that the Minister for Rural Affairs will confirm today that the site will be dismantled and restored to its former use as a peaceful wildlife habitat......"
In September last year a DEFRA spokesman said : "We had hoped that the county council would be able to buy it and turn it into something the community could use. "There is not much we can do other than offer it for sale to the highest bidder."
March 13 ~ FARM
needs to fill two new posts:
RESEARCH & POLICY OFFICER
and
MEMBERSHIP SYSTEMS & OFFICE MANAGER (See job descriptions)
"...An interest in and empathy for farming and rural communities essential to both posts Please send CV and covering letter to: farm PO Box 26094, London SW10 0XZ
Closing date for applications: Friday, April 4th
Strictly no agencies
FIGHT FOR A REAL FUTURE FOR FARMING.
JOIN FARM" www.farm.org.uk
March 13 ~ Anthony Gibson on bio-fuels
"...I listened to a man called Melvyn Askew talking on the subject last Thursday evening. You may not have heard of Melvyn, but he is a man to be reckoned with. Arguably, no-one has had a greater influence on the English landscape in the last 30 years. For Melvyn it was who popularised the growing of oilseed rape in the 1970s, and who therefore gave us those vivid splodges of bright yellow which, love them or hate them, have become such a feature of the countryside in spring. The prospect now is that he will bequeath us coast-to-coast willow coppice; which might not be to everyone's taste but would at least be preferable to those hideous wind turbines!
Anyway, as head of the alternative crops and biotechnology group at the Central Science Laboratory, Melvyn knows his subject, and he brings to it a refreshing mix of enthusiasm and realism. ..." Western Morning News
March 12 ~ DEFRA yesterday unveiled a comprehensive training package, aimed at all those engaged in the humane culling of animals, ranging from a notifiable disease outbreak to a roadside emergency.
See DEFRA press release (external link)
"The package consists of a video, "Getting it Right - First Time, Every Time", interactive CD-ROM, which includes a case study, and a training manual.
....The CD contains a case study of a disease outbreak with question and answer sections to be completed by the trainee.
It covers all aspects of emergency and disease control situations, from the initial risk assessment and health and safety issues, through animal handling, biosecurity, culling to final disposal of carcases.
In the event of a future outbreak of FMD, the option of using emergency vaccination would be considered from the start but it would still be necessary to slaughter infected animals and those suspected of being infected. (warmwell's emphasis)
Animal Welfare Minister Elliot Morley said the Government was committed to improving all aspects of animal welfare. "We have learnt many lessons from recent disease outbreaks and are determined to build on the lessons learned....."
We are happy to read this commitment to humane slaughter - and would be even more pleased to read a detailed description of the "many lessons learned" from recent disease outbreaks. All the same, "those suspected of being infected" is a term open to very wide interpretation. Pre-emptive culling, which does not appear anywhere in the draft EU Directive, may be removed from the Contingency Plan and Decision tree as a result of the widespread consultation on DEFRA's Contingency Plan.
This would make us happier still.
March 12 ~ William Moyes says that Animal By-Products Regulation will create huge problems
The British Retail Consortium (BRC) says 750,000 tonnes of waste will have
to be incinerated rather than taken to a landfill
site.
each year, lumping extra costs on SMEs selling
"loose products", including butchers, fishmongers and delicatessens.
...and could mean
fewer meat products on offer to customers. Small shops 'hardest hit' under EU rules (BusinessEurope.com)
"This could make it uneconomic for many small retailers; including farm
shops, farmers' markets, and convenience stores, to sell the variety of
specialist products that consumers have come to expect," he said.
"Given that there is no additional risk from the sale of loose products, the
BRC believes that transitional arrangements should apply to all retail food
waste, until appropriate incineration capacity exists."
Separately, the Engineering Employers' Federation has voiced its concern
over other parts of landfill legislation.
It says government plans to increase landfill tax - a measure designed to
encourage recycling by companies - is premature, because there is currently
not enough investment in alternative disposal processes."
It was, of course, William Moyes whose evidence about his organisation's willingness for vaccination to take place during the Foot and Mouth crisis of 2001 suggested that it was not opposition from retailers that stopped vaccination.
March 12 ~" this work is underway."
From the NFMG's response to the DEFRA Contingency Plan, kindly forwarded to us today: "The outstanding issues which remain are also due in part to the EU Directive - which specifies the various treatments for animal products - both from vaccinated and non-vaccinated areas, and the sampling and sero-surveillance that would have to take place after vaccination - with differential tests that are some way from full validation.
This does not mean that this approach/process cannot be used - but that a sampling/surveillance regime which incorporates these tests will have to meet OIE and EU requirements - this work is underway. "
We find this response document and its appendices both constructive and illuminating.
March 12 ~ Continuing confusion about the new rules targeting red diesel fraud.
FWi (external link) reports that " officials insist that the "average farmer" will not be affected by new rules targeting red diesel fraud.
HM Customs and Excise rejected claims that farmers hiring out tractors to their neighbours will have to keep additional fuel records....It was never the government's intention for farmers who hire out [tractors] to neighbours to be included in the scheme....But the National Farmers' Union claims this statement contradicts advice it was given by Customs and Excise last week.
NFU leaders have warned members who hire out tractors that they must "gain approval as a fuel dealer" if the vehicle has any fuel in its tank.
The Construction Plant-hire Association said the scheme rules posed serious problems for hire companies and contractors.
A spokesman said: "It has huge implications and there will be a flood of paperwork to complete every month."
March 11 ~ "Perhaps Silence of a Dale shouldn't just be playing Skipton Auction Mart, but also the House of Commons."
From the Guardian article "After the Cull"
"A murmur of sympathy ripples through the hall when a farmer ...tells of having barely slept for 10 days and nights during lambing, only to have all his animals shot. ... the army sergeant in charge of the cull on his farm hiding behind the barn and crying: "We've been trained to go to war, to kill people, and do whatever we're supposed to do. That's fine. But no one ever told me I'd have to shoot lambs." I look around and see that tears shine in many eyes.
.... The audience laugh derisively and with evident enjoyment when an actor in a mask re-creates Tony Blair's statement, delivered in May 2001, about how the government was dealing with the crisis, complete with Blair's verbal tics. I can remember hearing that speech and the subsequent quizzing by reporters on the radio, and thought at the time that it sounded a perfectly reasonable response. In this damningly effective piece of agit-prop theatre, it sounds like the bluster of a desperate man who knows he hasn't got anything under control and an election is looming.
The rolls of toilet paper littering the stage, representing the endless and sometimes conflicting directives issued to farmers during the crisis, add to the sense of a situation that is completely out of hand. So does the story of the wool trader who rings up the ministry of agriculture to ask whether the ban on the movement of sheep has any effect on his trade, and is asked in all innocence: "Has the wool been anywhere near a sheep?"
Silence of a Dale is touring villages in the Dales before ending up at the Harrogate Theatre studio. One of its venues is Skipton Auction Mart, the local livestock market, which was shut down during the foot and mouth crisis and still requires those who enter and leave to pass through disinfectant points...Perhaps Silence of a Dale shouldn't just be playing Skipton Auction Mart, but also the House of Commons."
March 11 ~ Snowie Ltd criticised
The Scotsman(external link) reports today:"A draft Scottish Executive report published today will criticise Scotland's
most high-profile waste disposal firm for spreading animal remains on fields
close to a central Scotland village.
Snowie Ltd, which was controversially awarded a £60million government
contract in 2001 to clean up after the foot-and-mouth crisis, will be
denounced for its environmental record after residents in Blairingone,
Clackmannanshire, claimed outbreaks of illness among the local population
may be linked to the company's operations....The firm won the lucrative government contract to transport and dispose of thousands of animal carcasses to prevent the spread of the disease last spring before it emerged that one of the brothers, Euan Snowie, made a £5,000 donation to the Labour Party.
During the foot-and-mouth crisis, the firm's management of burial sites was called into question when 900 animals were buried at the wrong location at Tow Law, Country Durham, and had to be reburied. The company said it had been given bad advice. Snowie Ltd has been fined three times for breaching environmental standards. In October 2000, it pleaded guilty to causing liquid waste to enter a tributary of the Cadger Burn, near Blairingone. ...
It was also fined £3,000 after admitting it allowed distilling waste from breweries to run into a tributary of the River Teith, in Doune, Perthshire.
...
In June 2001, Snowie Ltd was fined £5,000 after injecting waste into land at a farm south of Saline, west Fife, in a manner that the Scottish Environment Protection Agency claimed was likely to cause pollution.
The company, which had a turnover of £17million in 2000, also has contracts with all three of Labours water quangos in Scotland, and with a string of local authorities. Its turnover last year more than tripled to £56million.."
On the Snowie website news page (external link) we read : "As a responsible and caring company, we were determined to find a method of sewage sludge disposal which ensur'ed public safety was protected at all times,"
March 11 ~ Chesters Livestock Market to close
From Cheshire on Line(external link) "CHESTERS farming community was mourning the end of an era last night after
it was revealed the citys livestock market is to close.....The prospect of further restrictions, including a ban on overnighting stock and a 150km travel limit, together with bleak Common Agricultural Policy review predictions, left F R Marshall with' few options.
Mr Bowman added: "Although prices are now reasonably b'uoyant, it has been a struggle.
"Farmers dont like being' scrutinised and have been using alternative means of selling, even if the prices are lower."
March 11 ~ Launch of CLA Rural Tourism policy Document
CLA Vice Pre'sident David Fursdon will launch a new CLA policy document Rural
Tourism: Opportunities for Growth today at a reception to
be attended by The Rt Hon. Alun Michael MP, Rural Affairs Minister and Dr
Kim Howells MP, Tourism Minister.
The CLA says, "Tourism is a vital engine of economic development in rural areas. It can
bring new income and jobs into rural communities at a time when they are
seeking to move away from over-reliance on primary agricultural production.
To realise its full potential, the rural tourism industry needs to be
supported by a strong infrastructure in terms of marketing, standard setting
and the fiscal climate. By publishing this document, the CLA hopes to
spark off a debate on how best to create the conditions in which rural
tourism can prosper and grow."
March 11 ~"It is always a bad sign when the man in charge starts talking about the need to draw lines in the sand..
..and Ben Gill, the NFU president, is no exception." writes Muckspreader in Private Eye this week. "In a convincing imitation of the late J. Major, Gill chose the NFUs recent annual conference to proclaim "there is no point whatsoever in farmers looking back at the suffering and problems of recent years and getting obsessed with petty irrelevances" (such as how useless their president has been at his job). "We have to stop whingeing about the past" he told his fast diminishing number of members.
"The farming industry cannot get back to where it was before" (presumably he means before he was elected to office) and "we must use the experience of foot and mouth to our best advantage".
One lesson most farmers l'earned from that experience, of course, was that Gills own contribution to the debacle was worse than useless, consisting of little more than prating about the evils of vaccination and endorsing the government's obscene policy of killing 9 million healthy animals.....
....When Gill went on to point out that farm incomes in the UK have fallen 30 percent in the last six years while everywhere else in the EU they have risen, he was again too tactful to point out why. This is that the UK government applies for an absolute minimum of the subsidies available from Brussels because, under the rules of Mrs Thatcher's rebate, British taxpayers must shell out a higher contribution to subsidies than anyone else, while othe'r EU governments grab all they can get. Our farmers are thus expected to compete with EU counterparts whose produce is cheaper because it is more highly subsidised, not least thanks to those generous UK taxpayers. It is hardly surprising that our supermarkets prefer to buy from France and Ireland. You can't expect Mr Gill to explain this, because his members might wonder why we belong to such a silly club anyway. But at least, since Brussels has now decided that the next FMD epidemic will be tackled by vaccination, the NFU will tell us how they can't imagine why no one came up with such a wonderful idea before. ..." (More)
March 10 ~ "...simply lending a tractor to a neighbour should not require a ridiculous paper chase" Marcus Themans, chairman of the National Farmers' Union technical committee
More ludicrous regulation, this time from HM Customs and Excise. The new rule will also affect machinery hire companies which supply vehicles or equipment containing kerosene or red diesel.
Anyone wanting to lend a neighbour a tractor will have to join a special scheme listing them as Registered Dealers in Controlled Oils. They will have to fill in forms saying how much fuel was in the tractor.
All this comes into force, appropriately enough, on 1 April. See FWi report (external link) by Jane Oliver.
March 10 ~ "The FSA said at the time that there was no evidence of beef being used in this way in UK imports..."
Beef and pork proteins found in imported chicken.
Food watchdog delayed issuing test results to avoid alarm
Felicity Lawrence
writing in today's Guardian (external link)
"The UK is still a dumping ground for thousands of tonnes of cheap chicken adulterated with water and beef and pork proteins, according to food safety watchdogs......The FSA said at the time that there was no evidence of beef being used in this way in UK imports, and that the matter was simply a labelling issue. It was expected to release the results of its latest tests last week, but delayed publication for fear of creating panic among ethnic minority communities and prejudicing possible prosecutions, according to well placed sources. ......The FSA was first warned that beef of unknown provenance was being used to adulterate chicken in 2000. .......
The FSA has only now begun to use tests which are sensitive enough to identify the beef. And since the source of the beef used to make the protein powders has still not been established, the possibility of a BSE risk cannot be eliminated.
The latest FSA tests also show that hydrolysed pork proteins, extracted by chemical hydrolysis from old animals, or parts of animals which cannot be used for food, such as skin, hide, and bone, are being used to bulk up chicken labelled as halal. ........
Prof Harriet Kimbell, a member of the government's advisory committee on BSE, said she was outraged that people were being deceived in this way.....
The FSA said it could not comment until the results of its tests had been published."
March 10 ~ "The 1993 EU national contingency plans document is interesting.
It stresses the importance of dating the lesion. I
don't think Defra's mentions this. And I don't think any of the modellers
did either, did they?" writes an emailer.
We wonder whether DEFRA has been aware of this document, published as Appendix 6 (i) to Report of the European Commission for the Control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease, Rome, Italy, 27-30 April 1993. It was given to the Lesson Learned Inquiry at the end of warmwell's interview with Ian Anderson
The suggested contingency plan for EU member states that was produced as far back as 1993 is shown here side by side with the very much longer 2003 DEFRA draft.
March 10 ~ "It is heartening that there are farmers who care about the health and well-being of their animals, their land and their customers...."
"....Anyone can go and see them.
Similarly, there are people who care about peace and are prepared to say so. We are even in a majority. The official policy of bullying, killing, and manipulating the truth is increasingly seen through.
Surely this has got to be good news?"
Hilary Peters has been reporting on good practice seen in Gloucestershire. She begins: "....Still reading Laurence Woodward on the aims of organic farming:
".. the business we are really in - the changing the world business."
This takes me back to the beginning of this diary, when I came across Joan Hardingham's words in her farm shop at Alder Carr, Needham Market:
"By choosing to eat these products, you can become involved in changing the way the world works."
It seems a little thing to do (to buy one product rather than another) and it will only change the world in a little way.
We have seen recently what happens when we try to change the world in big ways. Government departments will go to any lengths to implement a hidden policy. .."
March 10 ~ "we must persevere because there is this window of opportunity to make progress; we have achieved a lot...
.... " the OIE seem to have bent over backwards to accommodate the progressive things that we have been saying, as have the Royal Society and the EU Temporary Standing Committee, and apparently, the EU and UK Ministers similarly. None of them wants a repeat of 2001, and all emphasise the role of vaccination at the forefront of defence, alongside culling of infected and D/C stock. Ministers, of course, are notoriously transient, unlike the Civil Servants who will actually implement the Controls in 5, 15 or 30 years time.
However, what one might term 'reactionary forces' present at the meetings seem determined to undermine this process of change, completely unwilling to reappraise the new technology, and as resolved to not allow the Policy to be changed as we are to move it forward. ..."
Part of an email from the dairy farmer Chris Stockdale who, we understand, has advocated a 'Stakeholder Communication Group' ..."so that we can liaise over simple and complex issues and extend the Debate outside the 2 allocated hours. DEFRA are copied in so it is neither secret nor anti-DEFRA.
This process, along with the Stakeholder 'Innovation Monitoring' Group, were proposed at the Stakeholder Meeting of January 30th, but were deemed by the Chair a little premature. Various Stakeholders disagreed and so the former group was born..." Read whole message
March 10 ~"In response to challenges regarding the composition of the Stakeholder Group Consultees....
...DEFRA have sent out a communication which concludes:-
If you are aware of any other organisation or individuals who would like to participate in this consultation please let ....... know so that a copy of these papers can be sent to them.
"I have deleted the name and e-mail address ..., but you can route inquiries back to me. I have taken the liberty of flagging this up as I am sure it is genuine; the issues to do with post-vaccination treatment of meat, for example, are so complex that a few more heads would be useful." Chris Stockdale's message
March 9 ~ The technology is becoming an essential component of modern disease surveillance systems
March 8 ~ DEFRA's Left and Right hand
From the Guardian's Yesterday in Parliament page - Fowl Plague (external link)
A poultry imports ban was demanded after an outbreak of Avian influenza in the Netherlands. Tory Bill Wiggin urged ministers to stop the disease, also known as Fowl Plague, from entering the UK where he warned it could become "another style of foot and mouth". But the environment secretary, Margaret Beckett, said although she took the disease "very seriously" she could not stop imports.
From the DEFRA website(external link) on the same day
GOVERNMENT BANS LIVE POULTRY FROM THE NETHERLANDS FOLLOWING OUTBREAK OF AVIAN INFLUENZA
Defra has banned imports of live poultry and hatching eggs from the Netherlands following suspicion of avian influenza. Similar moves have been made by the Welsh Assembly, the Scottish Executive and the Northern Ireland Executive.
This action parallels emergency EU legislation introduced on 3 March prohibiting the Dutch authorities from allowing exports of poultry and hatching eggs from the Netherlands.
Defra has informed poultry trade associations and all known importers of poultry and hatching eggs that imports have been suspended ....."
March 7 ~ "their
expertise to identify and deal with the consequences...."
Farming Today. Listen again "Anna Hill learns that the British Veterinary Association has hit out at
the Government's failure to include its vets in any contingency plans to
fight bio-terrorism. A month ago the B.V.A. wrote to DEFRA, the Home Office
and the Ministry of Defence, pointing out that any terrorist action
bringing in animal diseases or affecting livestock would need their
expertise to identify and deal with the consequences. They've received no
reply.
In America, however, since September 11th, vets have been involved with the
details of contingency planning in the event of a bio-terrorist attack.
Veterinary courses have even been altered to include special training on
public health issues and emergency response."
March 7 ~ ".. double-tagging and no burying will be supported by countries like France and Ireland who would dearly love our sheep meat market."
Jeff Swift in "Over the Gate"
"....For as long as there have been farmers, and that is a long time, they have buried dead stock on the farm without, as far as I know, any adverse effects. Now our lords and masters in Brussels have decreed that we can no longer bury carcasses. Now, while we could manage very well without yon lot in Brussels, we can not manage without a satisfactory system for carcass disposal and there is no such satisfactory system in being for May 1. .....
The reason given for bringing in this absurd regulation is that they claim burial has environmental and health risks due to pollution getting into rivers. If procedures need to be put into place in order to combat so called environment and health risks then the measures should be paid for by the Government as, I understand, is the case in other EU countries. But then, other nations give their agriculture and fishing industries high priority...
To install an on farm incinerator costs in the region of £10,000 plus running
costs to do a job you did with a spade or a digger and then you have to pay for the ash to be transported to a licenced site to be dealt with at a further cost, of course. The present knacker industry could not hope to cope and farmers are not allowed to band together and co-operate with somebody having an incinerator on their farm and others bringing carcasses to it for fear of spreading disease...........
If, before the vote was taken, some of the Brussels bureaucrats were taken up into the high fells
and left to carry a dead sheep down to a road where it might be collected, I'll bet the poorly thought out regulation would have been voted out.
The structure of the United Kingdom sheep industry is unique. Nowhere else in Europe do they have a structure like ours where the hills and mountains are a reservoir of both breeding stocks and feeding stock for the lowlands. Anything that is likely to prove a great problem for the British sheep industry such as double-tagging and no burying will be supported by countries like France and Ireland who would dearly love our sheep meat market. "
March 7 ~ " The EU proposals for fighting FMD are reasonably fair, but the UK makes it clear they are willing to go beyond what is proportionate
by invoking the AHB (AHA 2002) - this cannot be acceptable." writes Bryn Wayt in his reply to DEFRA's appeal for responses in its "consultation" on Community measures for the control of foot-and-mouth disease and amending Directive 92/46/EEC
- The main theme of the UK's reaction to another FMD outbreak is wholesale slaughter; very little effort has been devoted in anchoring vaccination as a tool of first resort - this is not acceptable.
- The UK is woefully behind in utilising FMD science and teaching.
- The politics of FMD have overtaken monetary logic of this limited UK market.
- This EU and related UK Plan is convoluted and confusing, which will give rise to misinterpretation of Annex X.
- "Never again should it be so costly in money, resources, animals, animal welfare or human misery" (Dr Keith Sumption) - the UK is ready to ignore these wise words.....
....That Uruguay had the tools and the 'will' was enough for them. Their vaccination strategy was not even written into their Contingency Plan when they started vaccinating. That is how easy, effective and efficient their plan was; no rocket science nor 125 pages of convoluted, complicated red-tape, nor 200 pages of instructions, 70 Annexes and 10 Appendices the UK had to produce to train vets how to deal with the UK "Stamping Out" policy.." Read Bryn Wayt's submission
See also Sutmoller and Barteling Points to consider in the prevention, control and eradication of FMD
" 41. In Uruguay a FMD outbreak as extensive as in the UK was - without massive stamping-out - quickly brought under control by the restriction of livestock movements and massive vaccination of the cattle population of approximately 10 million cattle. As in the past, vaccination of the nearly 13 million sheep was not required to control and eradicate the disease.
42. Re-introduction of general vaccination of the cattle in Europe is not necessary provided that contingency plans include adequate infrastructure of veterinary services, logistics, and the availability (from vaccine banks and production facilities) of large quantities of vaccine....
44. International cooperation has been a major instrument in the struggle against the disease. A global approach towards FMD control and eradication is more needed then ever."
March 7 ~ Another "consultation period"..this time on the OTMS rule
Robert Uhlig in the Telegraph reports:"The Food Standards Agency will announce proposals today to scrap the over-30 months rule introduced in 1996 to minimise the risk of humans eating BSE-infected beef.
Following a public meeting with consumer groups and the beef industry today, and a consultation period, the agency's board will make recommendations to ministers by July. The recommendations are expected to bring a relaxation of the current stringent rules....."
March 6/7 ~".. the sheer stupidity of it all makes me so mad"
An emailer - who unsurprisingly begs to remain anonymous - has written with the desperate frustration that many readers will recognise: ".....
The DEFRA minions (sheep counters and box tickers) arrived just a few minutes after me.... to count the farm's sheep which are free to roam over God knows how many acres of moorland, living and dying up on the open moor as they have done for centuries. Only now of course they can't continue to follow the old pattern of life and death - as of next month a farmer has to be certain that he "disposes" of all dead sheep in compliance with the new regulations at a cost of £17 per carcass - probably not far off what the animal was worth while alive. Plus they discovered that 50/60 of his sheep are missing presumed stolen....
He was on restriction due to local foot & mouth, then TB in his cattle (now clear but probably only temporarily bearing in mind the number of badger setts on his land) and now has to go through all that palaver of double-tagging moorland sheep, finding (across hundreds if not thousands of acres of open moorland strewn with rocks and bracken and gorse bushes and streams) and disposing of any dead bodies at a higher cost than the profit he would probably be able to make for selling it as a healthy living animal...
Right, gripe over for now - just had to spit it out to somebody.... the sheer stupidity of it all makes me so mad."
We are reminded of an extract from Jackie Ashley's article in the Guardian on Thursday about how remote politicians and bureaucrats are from reality: "the cheery, supportive team of advisers, the polite civil servants.... Even for ordinary ministers, Westminster and Whitehall act as a kind of cocoon. The shouts in the street have bounced off those walls for centuries...."
March 5/6 ~ From the Animal Health Act 2002
14A National contingency plan
(1) The appropriate authority must prepare a document (the national contingency plan) indicating the arrangements the authority intends to put in place for the purpose of dealing with any occurrence of-
(a) foot-and-mouth disease;
(b) such other disease as the authority by order specifies.
(2) After preparing a draft of the national contingency plan the appropriate authority-
(a) must send a copy of the draft to such persons and organisations as the authority thinks are representative of those having an interest in the arrangements;
(b) must consider any representations made to the authority about the draft by such persons and organisations;
(c) may amend the draft accordingly.
(3) After the appropriate authority has proceeded under subsection (2) the authority must-
(a) lay the plan before Parliament (unless subsection (9) applies);
(b) publish it in such manner as the authority thinks likely to bring it to the attention of persons who may be affected by the arrangements.
(4) The appropriate authority must from time to time (but not less frequently than at intervals of one year) review the plan and if the authority thinks it appropriate revise the plan...." The amended Animal Health Act 2003
March 5 ~"... with our deep cynicism of any so-called "consultation" process..."
"..... and now even Mary's apparently limitless patience with DEFRA has finally run out." writes Alan Beat in a special edition of his newsletter to publicise Mary Marshall's critique of DEFRA's Contingency Plan "Exasperated by the lack of any significant shift from the disastrous policies of the 2001 foot and mouth epidemic, she has now prepared a hard-hitting critique of DEFRA's contingency plan for FMD, and this is given in full below.
Please don't make the mistake of thinking that this is just another complaint about what happened two years ago. It isn't. This is about the scientific advances that are desperately needed within our animal health framework, not just for FMD, but for a whole range of diseases that increasingly threaten UK livestock. There are important implications for human health too, for much the same science is essential to counter terrorist threats like anthrax, smallpox and other biological weapons. But instead of moving forward to make best use of existing and emerging technologies, DEFRA seem resolute in their opposition to change.
Just ask yourself, what has been their immediate response to recent or threatened animal disease outbreaks? BSE - kill. FMD - kill. TB - kill. Brucellosis - kill. Scrapie - kill. Rabies - kill (they are actually field-testing fox poisons right now). Are we living in the 21st century, or the 19th?
The Royal Society report of last year made specific recommendation that a viable emergency vaccination strategy for FMD should be in place before the end of 2003. With only a matter of months now remaining, the evidence of DEFRA's published contingency plan is that virtually no progress towards this goal has been achieved. ...."
Read the newsletter
So much for the government's much vaunted openness and transparency. It is becoming more and more apparent that DEFRA's decisions concerning animal disease policy are made in small unpublicised meetings with the big players. It is difficult to avoid thinking that, for these people, their own careers, profits and ambitions are the only consideration.
March 4/5 ~ DEFRA to preempt GM trials
This evening's FWi report is based on articles in the Independent and Guardian ("Margaret Beckett, the environment secretary, has decided that 18 applications to the EU for growing and importing crops such as GM maize, oil seed rape, sugar beet and cotton are unstoppable and the British government has no alternative but to process them. In the past few weeks Bayer has applied directly to Mrs Beckett to plant and market GM oil seed rape, and Monsanto has applied to import GM maize. ..")
.... "A spokesman for DEFRA confirmed that licensing would take place without considering the outcome of public debate," the paper added.
But the department said that any licences could be revoked or amended if evidence emerged on public health or environmental damage.
The move has angered both the Scottish executive and the Welsh assembly.
Ross Finnie, the Scottish environment minister, is reported to have made a personal protest to Mrs Beckett demanding the licensing process be halted.
A spokesman for the executive said going ahead with the GM plans before public opinion was known would be "premature and improper"..."The paper also highlighted the results from farm-scale trials will not be available before the public debate starts in June.
This is because of the Royal Society's "lengthy" peer review process which will hold back the results until September.
The paper added: "A week ago, Mrs Beckett doubled to £500,000 the funding of the government-sponsored debate on the introduction of GM crops and extended it from June to September...The government promised to take full account of the views thrown up by the public and the evidence from the crop trials before any commercial planting took place."
March 4/5 ~ Food Labelling Bill "The Government's approach to this Bill will be a test of the Government's sentiment towards British Farmers" David Lidington
"The Government has a real opportunity on this the third time of presenting the Honesty and Food Labelling Bill, and not to scuttle behind arguments that the matter is delegated to Europe, rather than the British Parliament. In the interest of British farmers, producers and consumers alike, this Bill has always had the backing of the NFU, the National Pig Association, and Consumer groups. If a Labour Government won't back it, then I am delighted that the next Conservative Government will." Stephen O 'Brien MP
David Lidington MP said, "I welcome Stephen O 'Brien MP for Eddisbury Food Labelling Bill it will take the debate forward and add pressure on Ministers to introduce more stringent rules on labelling. The last time a similar Bill was put forward, it was blocked by Government Ministers. The Government's approach to this Bill will be a test of the Government's sentiment towards British Farmers." See Press Release
March 4 ~"Vaccination policies and trade regulation must be based on risk assessments taking these factors into consideration."
Example paper - summary Unapparent foot and mouth disease infection (sub-clinical infections and carriers): implications for control
P. Sutmoller & R. Casas Olascoaga
".....The implications of sub-clinical infections for the control of FMD
are serious because such animals are likely to disseminate the disease when in contact with susceptible livestock. Recent dissemination of FMD virus (FMDV) in Europe shows that sub-clinically infected animals render trade in animals or animal products a potential risk for importing countries. This clearly demonstrates that the paradigm 'free of FMD without vaccination' is not synonymous with 'risk-free'. The risk of introduction of sub-clinical FMD into FMD-free countries may increase significantly, with the occurrence of large susceptible animal populations, changed agricultural practices, expansion of trade in live animals and animal movements, increased trade in animal products and greater mobility of people. Such changes in circumstances require that national and international authorities remain continuously vigilant to determine any altered risk for importation of FMD.
A few historical reports and some recent observations in southern
Africa indicate the possibility of dissemination of FMD by bovine carriers into herds of susceptible cattle. These reports have greatly influenced FMD trade policies and thus, FMD control and eradication strategies. However, other field evidence does not support this claim and several controlled experiments were unable to show that carriers are able to initiate disease.
When millions of cattle were systematically vaccinated with good quality vaccines, FMD disappeared in spite of a large sentinel population in the form of calves and unvaccinated sheep and pigs. A low number of carriers most likely persisted, but they did not hamper the eradication of the disease.
Vaccination policies and trade regulation must be based on risk assessments taking these factors into consideration."
See From the OIE website - an important new scientific review of FMD:
Foot and mouth disease:
facing the new dilemmas
March 4 ~ "Without Fred Brown none of the dissent about the lunatic modelling and mad slaughter might ever have been heard"
An emailer from the FMD Forum writes, "
I am delighted to see it is 'Tetracore PCR Day' today on warmwell.
Good for Mary Marshall. I am slightly sad not to see anywhere Fred Brown being referred to and acknowledged as the gallant "neck sticker outer" of this whole sorry affair! Without him none of us would have understood the significance of the whole thing. Because of the politics between the USA and Britain, (via in this case USDA) Pirbright would have been able to continue to sweep it under the carpet as the portable PCR machine wasn't theirs and still isn't."
We entirely agree and hasten to assert that it was Professor Fred Brown who made us all aware of the way the technology was being ignored from the very start. It was his wisdom and knowledge, his calm insistence that what was happening was tragic that inspired many to dare to question the UK Government policy. Professor Brown's sanity seemed pitted against all odds; he suffered a massive heart attack under the strain of being belittled and ridiculed by (it seemed) everyone from the Government Chief Scientist down. Worse, he was cynically accused of having vested interests - a ludicrous slur that was easily refuted. The Rapid Diagnosis Tetracore PCR machine was even erroneously referred to as 'Fred's machine' - as if he was some imbecilic crackpot. But Mary Marshall's submission below shows that the US and Europe is taking new advances in animal disease diagnosis very seriously indeed. Tests are validated and ready to go for emergencies already. If - out of a refusal to admit past errors, commercial jealousy, or some other motive as yet unknown, the UK ignores the new technology of diagnosis and surveillance, it will be a tragedy for this country, for its livestock and farmers, for its rural economy, and our tarnished international reputation is likely to take even longer to recover.
March 4 ~ "I should think there would be no other action that would do more to improve the viability of British Agriculture and the health and well-being of the people of this Nation than truthful and honest labelling."
writes Julia Horner, "The "Honesty in Food Labelling Bill" (external link) is due for its second reading in the House of Commons this Friday. It seeks to give compulsory country of origin labelling on every main ingredient on all food products and standards of production from raw materials. And for the first time give people the information which is their right.
We are told the country needs cheap food - but at what cost?
History has shown that where ever there has been cheap food it has only come by the exploitation of labour, the exploitation of the land or animals, at the expense of our biodiversity and the corruption of the genetic integrity of the planet. We see the recommendations of The Curry Report working through in Rural Regeneration with initiatives directed at locally produced food being used to enhance the regionality of area. How much more effectively spent would be the money put into these schemes if they were reinforced by accurate labelling.
The resurgence of Farmers markets show there is a welcoming climate for the food of the small family farms,
But it is only a minority of people that have the time to search these out. Current labelling can trick people in their choices.
As more and more supermarket aisles are claimed by ready meals and processed foods, people should be allowed to know at a glance if they are eating chicken from the Far East, beef from Zimbabwe - or meat produced in this country to our higher welfare and health standards." See also entry for Feb 25
March 4 ~ "Sir,
Two years ago, a powerful national leader attacked a minority group within his own country.
Army, police and ministry
personel were mobilised in huge numbers, blocking roads, isolating villages. Whole areas of rural hinterland were
closed off.
Millions were slaughtered; more died in appalling conditions of cruelty and starvation. Businesses were destroyed;
swathes of countryside stripped of livestock.
Laws were broken, human rights abused, yet no-one has been brought to account. The leader remains in office; indeed,
has increased his power to commit further atrocities through draconian new legislation.
His name is Tony Blair, and those who now protest at his planned use of force against the people of Iraq might ask
themselves - 'why did we remain silent when he first unleashed such violence against our own farming community?'
Yours faithfully
Alan Beat
Smallholders Online
www.smallholders.org
The Bridge Mill, Bridgerule, Holsworthy, Devon"
Alan Beat's letter to the Telegraph was copied to us. We too find that there are alarming parallels between the unwarranted and hushed-up horrors of FMD 2001 and the present desperate attempts to legitimise slaughter in Iraq.
March 3 ~ Comments on Defra's Foot and Mouth Disease Contingency Plan, Version 2.5
" "Defra should not be re-fighting the last war, but planning and training for the next."
While welcoming the consultation process on the contingency plan, I find the current document woefully inadequate and hope that significant changes in strategy based on recent developments in diagnostics and surveillance will be implemented, and further relevant research and trials will be supported and funded. Through my contacts with scientists in the UK, EU and North America, I am in possession of a considerable amount of information, some of which I have been asked to share only with government agencies. In all cases, I have shared information which is not in the public domain with Defra. In the comments that follow, I may refer to some of this information without providing full references, but all of this information is in the hands of Defra. ..."
Mary Marshall,
Member of Defra's FMD Stakeholders Group, representing the Smallholders Forum.
and member of the Foreign and Emerging Diseases Committee of the US Animal Health Association has submitted an astonishingly knowledgeable response to DEFRA's Contingency Plan. It is of great importance - and we quote at some length from it in the paragraphs below. The entire paper may be read here.
March 3 ~ "Absent from this document are the crucial topics on improving diagnosis and record/data acquisition and analysis."
( Comments for DEFRA on their FMD Contingency Plan) There are major sections in the Contingency Plan on the press and internal press activities, and a curious phrase "Stakeholder Handling" (are we dangerous animals to be kept firmly under control?). Absent from this document are the crucial topics on improving diagnosis and record/data acquisition and analysis.
Professor Martin Hugh-Jones' comments sum it up perfectly:
"Some aspects which I hold are vital:
- Animal side tests of reliable sensitivity and high specificity. Nobody should or need wait for reference-quality laboratory confirmation.
- Wireless data acquisition from the farm at the time of examination and preliminary diagnosis by laptop or other suitable electronic device. Ditto updated data as the herd is processed. If "wireless" is difficult, it should be through a website or other access system that is available at all times. This should, if possible, include digital graphics acquisition and transmission -- if Page Street doesn't believe the VO, he can, for example, send a photograph of the lesions he has seen or of anything else.
- That data should be immediately omni-available, at least throughout Defra.
- The data loggers should have GPS chips installed so that there are no errors in accurately locating diseased, suspect, or healthy herds.
- Data should be GIS linked so that situations on individual farms can be queried remotely -- e.g., klik on a farm icon on a quasi-3-D map display, as well as to either constantly updated frequent analyses or by idiot-able custom analyses.
Martin Hugh-Jones is a UK (Cambridge)-trained vet, currently Professor of Epidemiology, Dept. of Pathobiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, and Moderator of ProMED-mail. His other posts include:
Director, World Health Organisation Collaborating Center for Reference & Training in
Remote Sensing and Geographical Information Systems for Veterinary Public Health
World Health Organisation/Veterinary Public Health,
Chairman, Working Group "Anthrax: Epidemiology & Information";
Coordinator, of Supervising Committee, "Anthrax Control & Research".
March 3 ~ Diagnostics.... portable real-time RT-PCR tests.....The US Congress has just been told that these tests are ready for use in an emergency....
( Comments for DEFRA on their FMD Contingency Plan)
"....Objections to the use of the portable real-time RT-PCR tests (e.g. the test developed by the USDA/Tetracore) are still being raised. ...
Fred Landeg..: "Steve Edwards, Vice President of the OIE Standards Committee, is one of Defra's chief advisors. We are not behind on this!" (where is this then to be seen in the Contingency Plan?), and he went on to say that Defra relies on Pirbright which has full up-to-date expertise and knowledge.
Would that this were true!
Pirbright's own portable PCR test is still in development, and Pirbright is under-staffed and under-funded. But according to Landeg, "This is a small island.... we have no trouble getting samples into the laborarory. Pirbright is the World Reference Library for FMD, and we use it in the laboratory, PCR that is. We are fully up to date".
This is surely open to international expert discussion and peer review. Defra may have no trouble getting samples to Pirbright, but in so doing, days will be lost and the disease likely to be out of control.
Suggestion:
In order to reduce time to detection, use should be made of portable real-time PCR tests that can identify all 7 serotypes of the FMDv within 2 hours, using samples taken by non-invasive procedures. An immediate standstill of all animal movements should be declared. The results of tests on samples sent for laboratory identification of the serotype, which would be available within 3 hours, should immediately trigger production and distribution of vaccine.
........"
March 3 ~ GIS surveillance ... " it can eliminate the need for bulky double tags on sheep and goats and reduce the amount of paper work .."
( Comments for DEFRA on their FMD Contingency Plan)
"....nowhere is there mention in this document of a comprehensive computerised GIS database and tracing capability linked to field diagnostics which would provide real-time disease management. The capability for this exists. There are at least two such systems: both are available through private US companies working independently but in cooperation with the US government. I have provided an outline of these and contact details to Defra.
When I asked about UK GIS capability at the stakeholders meeting on 25 February 2003, Fred Landeg replied that "we have GIS capability now and that it is exactly the same system that was in place in 2001".......
.....from one of the US companies:
"In summary, we can identify an animal or product ... at the farm, trace it through the supply chain, provide third party certification, use our newly developed biosensors to determine contamination ..., utilize new RFID technology for ear tags and container tracing, all with web based seamless technology. We can detect diseases with our sensors, provide immediate first responder information with contaminated area pictures, local supplier information, built in GIS/GPS analytical tools (water tables etc.), and provide check print outs for immediate producer payment. Our biosensors can detect any foreign-borne pathogen by contact or air. The new technology allows for rapid growth of the media cutting current standards in half. Most important we can do all of this economically
......"
The Polish government has requested a demonstration of the system developed by the other private company.
Contrast this with Roy Hathaway's statement on 25 February 2003 that "we need a few days to type the strain and trace the movements and dangerous contacts....there would be a standstill on day 1 [when is day one according to these plans?], then tracing ... vaccination would not start before 7 days".
March 3 ~ Real-time alert (table top) exercises
( Comments for DEFRA on their FMD Contingency Plan)
These are a requirement of the draft EU FMD Directive, but I could find no reference to them in the Contingency Plan. I have passed on to Defra information about the recent US exercises.
A comment from someone who was involved in one of these exercises:
"If DEFRA is relying on a seven day time table..."Good Luck". Twenty four hours is really stretching it in the states. In all our exercises FMD was out of control within that time frame. In the UK you have greater animal population densities, in smaller confined areas, and closer proximities than we do in the states. Disease transmission is much faster. Technology is the only key to detection and mitigation."
The exercises in the US have shown that stakeholder participation is essential, and has the added benefit of demonstrating to the livestock industry which regulations are important (and which are not important) in mitigating the effects of an outbreak (Roger Breeze, private communication).
March 3 ~ "We need balanced, focused leadership which can.. rise above.... narrow vested interest groups, researchers seeking funds .... political pressures. "
( Comments for DEFRA on their FMD Contingency Plan)
We need balanced, focused leadership which can evaluate, but also rise above, the quite legitimate demands of narrow vested interest groups, researchers seeking funds which may not be strictly relevant, and political pressures. This leadership should be centred on a strong CVO, advised by a group of government and independent scientists with a demonstrable predominance of veterinary expertise and experience.
The draft EU FMD Directive requires just such a permanent "expert group" (Article 78). Is it possible that such a group can be found amongst the numerous groups and committees outlined in the Defra's Contingency Plan? An explanation from Defra would be appreciated. This expert group must be more open and accountable than the group which was formed in 2001...."
March
3 ~"Please, can we fundamentally review the contingency plan and open it up to international consultation?"
" This is not a trivial matter. The stakeholders were told by Roy Hathaway on 25 February 2003 that the EU FMD Directive, which is legally binding in all EU countries, is a vague and loosely worded document, and consequently Defra will have broad powers of interpretation, including the full powers given in the Animal Health Act 2002. Some of these powers should never be exercised: with the sensible use of new diagnostic technologies that can rapidly and accurately identify infected animals and herds, there is no justification now or in the future for a contiguous or "firebreak" cull.
The use of this technology would allow for the rapid implementation of targeted vaccination, thereby reducing the numbers of animals needing to be slaughtered and needing to be vaccinated. The procedures (locally, regionally and at HQ) to implement this suggested strategy should constitute a substantial part of the Contingency Plan..."
March 3 ~ Will Defra have the courage to accept this new approach to animal disease control?
Will the government provide the necessary funding?
If the answer to these questions is "no", then one contributor's comments should be noted:
"Business is going to be directly behind the change. Class action litigation, demands from banks and financing agencies, lack of insurance coverage without exclusions, are having a global impact on the need for preventative measures.
Lending agencies and insurance companies are extremely concerned about the assets they are investing in or protecting. Animal health and food safety issues are at the top of the list. Earlier this year, in the state of Kansas we had a false FMD rumor surface. Within one hour, the commodity markets dropped the max, and every corporation that depended on beef did the same, many losing over a $1 share value. Fast food chains, steak house chains, feed companies etc. It took one hour to accomplish this, luckily the markets were closing, or it would have been worse. Bureaucrats need to understand the consequences; they need to be shown they must invest in the protection of the economic future of their country. All it takes is one incident. Unfortunately, FMD will be back in the UK, they must know how to immediately isolate and control the problem; every member of the EU needs to as well."
( Comments for DEFRA on their FMD Contingency Plan)
March 2/ 3 ~ Defra courts confusion
Booker's Notebook in the Sunday Telegraph
"There have been curious developments in the case of Janet Hughes, whose 12-year-old son Matthew's toys were due to be seized by bailiffs, thanks to the Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. Defra pursued her for £17,000 in legal costs after she failed to have the killing of thousands of healthy sheep on the Brecon Beacons declared illegal during the last foot and mouth epidemic.
The demand included interest post-dated to January 2001 - before the epidemic began and six months before she launched her case.
Following my report a month ago, the bailiffs removed Matthew's toy quad bike and jeep from their seizure notice, where they had been clearly recorded as "child's toys" - a clear breach of the rule that children's property cannot be seized. But they still announced their intention to remove other property, including the car that Janet needs for her work as an environmental science teacher.
On January 31 she applied to the High Court for a stay of execution, with a cheque for the £25 fee, on the grounds that her case was still with the European Court of Human Rights. When she rang several times to find out how the application was going, the High Court insisted that it had not been received, although it had already cashed her cheque. Last week she had to pay £1.13 to collect an unstamped envelope in which the High Court had returned her papers, with no explanation other than a scrawled "application refused, February 6".
Meanwhile, on February 22, she received a letter from the legal department at the ministry, which said: "I confirm that Defra will not take any further action at the present time."
Watch this space." Christopher Booker's Notebook Sunday Telegraph
March 1-2 ~"It seems that Defra is still woefully ill prepared..."
"... to implement emergency
vaccination, and yet it obviously has detailed slaughter plans. The
science is way ahead of Defra: there are the vaccines and tests available.
What has been lacking has been the political will to use the available
scientific knowledge to combat FMD in a 21st Century manner. It would
appear that there are still individuals in Defra who have an outdated
mindset, and that there have been too close links with individuals with
economic interests. I feel strongly that Defra needs to open up and to
modernise, and to be seen to do this by members of the public and the rural
community. Otherwise, there will be continue to be little trust placed in
the Department." Extract from Anne Lambourn's submission to DEFRA over its contingency plan, kindly sent to us by its author.
Feb 28 ~ "It would be catastrophic if another outbreak occurred while leisurely preparations were being carried out...".
We have received the submission of the Countryside Alliance and Honest Food to the latest Contingency Plan. (The deadline for submissions is today)
Extract: "While we welcome the publication of the contingency plans, we find it a little disappointing that, despite assurances, these do not seem to be much of an advance on the previous plans that did not, on the whole, prove to be very effective during the epidemic.
We also find it disappointing that inadequate attention has been paid to recent scientific developments around the world.....
...In particular, we would like to know whether there are any plans to develop on-farm testing for confirmation of FMD. Containment of a rapidly spreading disease and targeted vaccination or slaughter depend largely on ability to diagnose disease as rapidly as possible. While on-farm diagnosis will have to be confirmed by laboratory testing, it ought to be considered as an important part of the procedure. We understand that various methods of on-farm testing are being validated at the moment but would like some assurance that the validation process is going ahead as rapidly as possible; work done outside the United Kingdom and the European Union is being taken into account seriously; and that the possibility of validation being done by highly regarded private laboratories in parallel to DEFRA tests is being explored. None of this has been made clear either by the published contingency plans or by ongoing discussions of the stakeholders' group.
Very much the same comments would apply to the surveillance system. While we accept that DEFRA and Pirbright are working on surveillance systems and are, as the stakeholders' meeting was told, well aware of the newest technology, we are also aware that there were serious faults in the system during the last epidemic. We would like definite assurances that these faults are being dealt with and, again, work outside DEFRA and Pirbright is being taken into account and, when possible, used...." (More)
Feb 28 ~ " Localisation is not Utopia; it is the only viable future we have."
Localisation: A Move Away From Globalisation Extract: "We have to move away from a world dominated by big business and structured in the image of big business. ....Local food production and sale would be encouraged. More Farmers Markets would spring up. Food production would be organic. Organic food production is more than stocking supermarket shelves with chemical free food, it's about the whole philosophy of how we produce our food, our relationship with the land. Organic farms should be small family or community farms.
Local food does not require subsidised long distance transport systems or preservatives.
......Michael Shuman of the Washington-based Institute for Policy Studies summed up localisation thus:
... does not mean walling of the outside world. It means nurturing locally owned businesses which use local resources sustainably, employ local workers at decent wages, and serve primarily local consumers. It means becoming more self sufficient and less dependent on imports. Control moves from the boardrooms of distant corporations and back to the community where it belongs.
Localisation requires a political realignment. New Labour and the Tories are in the pockets of big business. LibDems have a fetish about Europe. ...."
Feb 28 ~ A new scheme to pay farmers to become rural guardians....
could "transform
the countryside" and save endangered wildlife....says the WMN. Lord Whitty says that such a scheme means "getting ahead of the game".....
Feb 28 ~
This item on Defra's computerised database system failures was on
Thursday's Farming Today.
Audio Farming Today
Interestingly, there was no mention of this in the written "programme
details" on the website.
Extract: "The failure to do the proper checks means that Defra will have to pay $15
million back to the EU. An investigation by commission inspectors revealed
shortcomings in on-farm inspections and inadequate controls of livestock.
Defra says "most of the mistakes took place because the database system
wasn't up and running".
According to Roger Waite of the agricultural newsletter Agrifacts, the
commission inspectors identified 4 or 5 different areas, above all that the
computerised database, traceability of cattle has certain shortcomings,
there weren't the necessary minimum levels of on-farm inspections, cross
checks were not done, and on the extensification premia there weren't
sufficient checks with regard to stocking densities. Also a slightly
different issue, intervention purchases of roughly 500 tons in Northern
Ireland were missing, and so it's because of the shortcomings that the
commission applies a flat rate reduction to penalise the UK for not
carrying out the necessary controls.
Miriam O'Reilly: Whose responsibility was it to make these checks -because
some of these issues sound pretty serious?
Waite: It's undoubtedly Defra's responsibility because each government has
the responsibility of making sure that the necessary checks are made and so
the buck stops very definitely at Defra."
Feb 28 ~ "..they must have broken every animal health welfare and animal health rule in the book. "
Over the Gate...
by Jeff Swift mentions omissions on BBC's Country file and talks wryly about the Animal Health Bill. Cumbria cannot forget, it seems - and neither can thousands of others. The Foot and Mouth crisis is a stain on Britain's history that is not going to be airbrushed away in spite of all attempts by the authorities responsible.
"VIEWERS who saw the Country File programme on February 16 may recall being told - among other things - about the Great Orton Burial Site and how it is being made into a landscaped environmental site. We were told that during foot-and-mouth, half a million animals were buried there. Great pits were bulldozed in the ground and lorry load upon lorry load of slaughtered animals was tipped into the huge graves. A ghastly sight.
What you were not told was that hardly any animals, if any at all, had been diagnosed as having the disease. What a waste, and all because some of those in charge panicked.
This cull has to be one of the greatest acts of government maladministration on record. It also means they must have broken every animal health welfare and animal health rule in the book. ...."
Feb 28 ~ Re: Friends like these
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/Content/displayPopup.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2003/02/28/dt2801.xml&site=15
Date: 28 February 2003
Sir - The timing of the new regulations criminalising the burial of sheep and lamb mortalities on farm could not be less fortunate (Comment, Feb 20).
The British sheep flock is uniquely large within the European Union. Lambing, which peaks in the period March to May, is the time of maximum lamb and ewe mortality. Death rates have been progressively reducing over recent years. Yet such is the size of the overall flock that we can predict two million lamb fatalities and one million ewe deaths in an average year. What are we now to do with these?
With two months to go, and many warnings, including my own (letter, Oct. 29) the Government has put in place the machinery for law enforcement, but made no effective attempt to cope with the problem, and as yet tendered no advice to flock masters. This is a further demonstration of why livestock farmers have come to regard the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs as at worst "the enemy" and at best the blundering incompetent ally of British farming. With friends like this, who needs enemies?
From:
David Craton, Hartley Manor Farm, Hermitage, Dorset
Feb 28 ~Re: Whitehall farce
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/Content/displayPopup.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2003/02/28/dt2802.xml&site=15
Date: 28 February 2003
Sir - Boris Johnson mentioned the new sheep tag rules. They are operating like a Whitehall farce. Less than two years ago, the Government introduced rules requiring all sheep to wear ear tags, marked with their flock number.
Defra has now decided to change these rules and every sheep must also have an individual number. I purchased 200 flock tags just over a year ago at almost £1 each and have more than half of them left. As these are now useless, I telephoned the Defra "sheep and goats helpline" for advice.
After the obligatory 10 minutes listening to canned music, I spoke to a woman whose defensive attitude indicated that other farmers had strongly pointed out their lack of forward planning. She was totally unhelpful and simply told me to contact the tag manufacturers.
I then had an e-mail conversation with the tag suppliers. I was told that, naturally, I could not mark on the numbers myself, they had to be returned for numbering at extra cost, and I had to return them through my agricultural supplier.
Off I went to the merchant in Alton. They said they could not accept the tags as they were closing down in a week's time and I would have to take them to the Winchester store. I drove to Winchester, explained the story again and was told that they could not take them - that I had to have them sent back from Alton. Back to Alton again, where they finally accepted the tags, but when I arrived home I received a telephone call saying that, as they were closing down they could not return them for numbering, and they had to go to Winchester again.
I can envisage spending the rest of my life driving up and down the A31 with these sheep tags, while my lambs, due any day, remain illegally unnumbered. Still, I suppose all this keeps someone at Defra happy.
From:
Mary Bantick, Three Beech Farm, Medstead, Hampshire
Feb 28 ~ Just how bad is the TB problem in UK Cattle?
An article on Land-Care.org.uk (external link) by
Dr James Irvine
FRSE, DSc, FRCP(Ed), FRCPath, FInstBiol
Extract:
"... Land-Care tried to obtain from DEFRA a map showing the geographical distribution of TB in UK cattle in 2002, but none was available even in the broadest terms. This is not helpful when a farmer is considering restocking or otherwise seeking replacements for his herd, or indeed setting up a new herd.
Clearly there is a very major problem with tuberculosis in the UK. Also clearly, the Government strategy to control it, set up by Professor Krebs and his committee in 1997 (1), has not been effective - indeed it would appear to have been disastrous."
See also
Feb 28 ~ It is difficult to justify DEFRA's claim that the ISG is in fact independent, when the appointments to the Group and payments to the members of the Group are controlled by DEFRA itself.
Again from Land-Care.org.uk, Dr Irvine's article: Independent Scientific Group (ISG)
on Cattle TB (external link) ..."The ISG was established in 1998 following a recommendation made by the Independent Scientific Review Group .....
It is ... difficult to justify DEFRA's claim that the ISG is in fact independent, when the appointments to the Group and payments to the members of the Group are controlled by DEFRA itself.
Information available from the relevant websites does not indicate who advised DEFRA on the appointment of members of the ISG. Such appointments are of importance as the programme of the Group will involve substantial research funds. Were these research projects peer reviewed? Or were they essentially decided by peers within what seems to be a less than independent group?
Viewing the Krebs committee that set up the ISG (1) and the membership of the ISG itself (see below), one cannot help but notice that a core membership seems to run through not only these influential bodies, but also in relation to the much criticised body advising the Government on the UK FMD crisis as well (2001 - 2002). Are we really so short of relevant and competent scientists in the UK that we have to keep using the same ones, and the same university departments, so often?
Feb 28 ~ The EFRA all-party committee will investigate boosting biofuel
Thursday's FWi reports that "an influential group of MPs is to investigate what measures should be put in place to boost production of biofuel crops..."
Feb 27 ~ "We are tending to concentrate on wind rather than wave, water, energy crops and bio-gas. People don't want wind farms."
Telegraph on Tuesday Richard Saville (external link): "....councillors bowed to local opposition and rejected the plans.......David Pinney, Torridge council's director of planning and technical services, said: "There were two concerns in all three cases. One was the visual impact both from a distance and close up. We are talking about very big structures in a rolling landscape.
"The second was the noise from the swish of the rotor blades."
He added: "People were genuinely concerned. The message from this is that we need to be more diverse in the way we look at sustainable energy.
"We are tending to concentrate on wind rather than wave, water, energy crops and bio-gas. People don't want wind farms....."
Feb 27 ~ Janet Hughes' worry goes on and on
Janet has written correcting our erroneous impression that the unstamped letter actually contained a reply from the High Court. No such luck. It contained only " my documents of application for a "stay of execution" and a statement on one of my forms that it had been refused. The court has still not replied even though three letters have been faxed to them..." Read the rest of her message - particularly the irony over the warrant: "...one of the main provisions that I was complaining about in the TSE Regulations; the obtaining of a warrant in the absence of the owner / occupier. DEFRA seems to have obtained a warrant for seizure of my possessions even before 14 days had expired from the initial costs order on 9 October 2001, and before any attempt on their part to request any form of payment. ..."
We should like to see a generous gesture to end Janet Hughes' anxiety.
Feb 27 ~ Demand Farmed Fuels
The CLA's Campaign (external link)
".... heat, electricity and vehicle fuel needs could be supplied by agriculture, "Bio fuels". All plant and animal matter contains energy, and have the potential to play a role in Government targets to reduce green house gas emissions and for renewable energy generation. They contribute to bio diversity and sustainable development, rural job creation and are a new commercial opportunity for the declining agricultural industry.
The CLA believes that given the right policy framework, the rural economy can play a significant role in the reduction of greenhouse gases and other adverse environmental impacts, and ensure we have a vibrant living and working countryside for generations to come.
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES:
To persuade Government to provide better support for renewable energy from the land.
- Through a reduction in Road Fuel Duty for renewable transport fuels
- Through a change in the renewable electricity mechanisms to better incentivise biomass electricity and CHP (Combined Heat and Power).
- Specific proposals:
- a) 10% target for renewable road fuels by 2010, half from bioethanol from wheat and sugar beet, half from biodiesel from oilseed rape
- b) A proportion of the Renewables Obligation to be specifically designated for biomass electricity, supported by a higher "buy-out" price
To educate the wider public about the benefits of bio-energy in all its forms, and demonstrate the role of agriculture in delivering it. "
Those who would like to support the CLA in its Biofuel Campaign should click the link
Feb 27 ~ Lunacy of banning on-farm burial of fallen livestock
Anthony Gibson writing in yesterday's Cornish Guardian: 'It is the most natural and sustainable method of recycling'
"Death is a sad but inescapable fact of farming life. Sheep especially have a quite remarkable propensity for dropping dead at a moment's notice, but any farming operation involving livestock, no matter how well ordered, will have its share of casualties.
........ Up until now, the task of disposal has been shared between the knackers and the hunt kennels, with all the rest (barring what the foxes, badgers and crows take) buried on farm.
... why on earth should it be that the EU is insisting that the burial of casualty stock should be banned as from May 1, to be replaced by an alternative which, whatever its final shape, can only be more expensive, more risky to human and animal health and infinitely less environmentally-friendly than the system it replaces? Leaving aside the admittedly tempting explanation that everything done in the name of Brussels must inevitably be mad, bad and anti-British, my conclusion is that the answer is actually nothing to do with any pollution risk, and everything to do with the great god traceability.
....
..... in Brittany, farmers leave their dead stock in large wheelie-bins at the side of the road, for collection by the flesh man. This does not make a pretty sight, as I know from the gruesome photographs sent me by a concerned reader, and the implications for animal disease appear quite horrendous. But the alternative, of knackers' vehicles travelling from farmyard to farmyard to collect animals which may very well have been diseased, is almost equally alarming.
This, from a Government which is forever lecturing farmers on the subject of biosecurity.... I would be surprised if we are looking at much less than £80 for adult cattle, £50 for growing cattle, £15 for calves, £17 for ewes and £27 for sows. In many cases that will be more than the profit which the farmer would have earned had the animal lived. ....."
Feb 27 ~ IS THIS THE FUTURE FOR CARCASS DISPOSAL?
This
gruesome scene outside a French farm could soon become reality for the
Westcountry when new EU directives come into force this spring. Western Morning News today ".... Colin Breed, a member of the Department of the Environment's select committee, says there is a need to ban the burials.
"The problem is that water tables have risen in recent years which means there are less places to dispose of stock and meet biosecurity measures. Burial remains will get into the water."
His concerns are that the British Government has taken too long to implement an acceptable alternative before the ban is in place.
He said: "Britain is late getting its act together, as ever. This is just like the fridge mountains, the Government has done nothing to prepare us for the directives.
"We need an effective way to dispose of animals within the new directive, or we will get the horrors shown in this photograph, and it's totally unacceptable."
In recent years the Government has been very concerned with the subject of biosecurity on British farms, far more so than many other European governments.
Mr Breed said: "French biosecurity measures are nothing like what we have had implemented since the foot and mouth crisis.
"France did not suffer from foot and mouth disease like us, so their regulations are not as stringent and costly as ours. If we need to pick up dead animals from more than one farm we would have to disinfect the vans after each collection."....."
Feb 27 ~ "growing crescendo of incredulity and protest against these nonsensical proposals."
From the Buchan Observer (external link)"... Another looming problem which will be exercising the minds of farmers at the spring show will be the European Commission's nightmare proposals for double tagging every sheep in the country - all eight million of them.
Both the NFU and the National Sheep Association have this week joined the growing crescendo of incredulity and protest against these nonsensical proposals.
The NSA has described the proposals as "unnecessary, unworkable and having no bearing on public health issues."
"For once, there is industry consensus on this issue," said NSA chief executive, John Thorley. "Officialdom, breeders and those concerned with public and animal health are totally against the EU plan." ......"...Blackface Sheep Breeders Association president, Norman Douglas, who has written to Ross Finnie stating that hill sheep farmers will simply not be able to comply with the regulation.
"At present, we have a system which works. Animals are fully traceable and recorded on all journeys," he points out. "In an extensive farming system, it would be impossible to comply with the proposed regulations. The law would quite clearly be on our side." ..."
Feb 26 ~
Re: Banning fuel crops is insane
A letter in the Telegraph today from Lord Palmer
Sir - I write to endorse the comments of Robert Sturdy MEP (letter, Feb. 18). Oil is close to $32 a barrel and 1.5 million British acres are idle under set-aside. All that is needed to make sense of the situation is a fuel duty rebate of 30p per litre (40p per litre has already been given to LPG). British farmers could then set to with a will to produce as much as 10 per cent of our fuel needs.
For the EU even to think about banning fuel crops from set-aside land is insane.
From:
Lord Palmer of Reading, British Association for Biofuels and Oils, London SW1
Feb 26 ~ "The way in which the High Court has acted has made me very angry indeed."
Janet Hughes has received a letter sent by the High Court giving her notice that her application of February 6th has been refused. No reasons have been given. The letter is dated February 21st and it had been franked at Welshpool, Powys. Janet had to pay £1.13 in order to receive it because no stamps had been put on it and it had not even been franked in London. This all seems rather bizarre, offhand and contemptuous. Can this really be our English High Court?
No answer has yet been received from DEFRA to Janet Hughes' letter of February 19th.
Feb 25/26 ~ Krebs trials have cost almost £24 million - that's
an average cost of around £5,400 per badger.
An article in the independent Western Morning News (external link) quotes Mr Morley "..."I am very
disappointed by this call for badger culling outside the trial areas,"
he said, "because I cannot see a shred of evidence to base that on.
"I am not afraid to take difficult and unpopular decisions, but I would
need some evidence to do that."
Mr Morley acknowledged that the TB control programme had been "seriously
derailed" by the 2001 foot and mouth disaster, when testing for the
disease was suspended.
But he said the backlog of overdue tests was being brought down and
insisted that the Krebs trials would still produce scientifically valid
evidence.
He said it was "very premature" to say that the disease was "spiralling
out of control" because the latest figures had not yet been analysed
properly."
(If only DEFRA had said that when it was actually true - near the start of FMD in March 2001 - when far from spiralling out of control, the disease had already peaked. See Alan Beat's comments)
Feb 25/26 ~
WIND WARNING
From Western Morning News (external link)
- 25 February 2003
" The treasured Cornish landscape must not be sacrificed to "monster"
wind turbines - some the height of Truro Cathedral - to meet the
Government's renewable energy targets, campaigners have warned.
Trade and Industry Secretary Patricia Hewitt yesterday unveiled a
strategy to cut carbon dioxide emissions through a major expansion of
renewable power sources. But it met with a chorus of concern from
conservationists as well as environmentalists and industry...."
See also what Christopher Booker in the Sunday Telegraph had to say last year about wind turbines:Extract "So ludicrously expensive and inefficient is this form of power generation that Denmark, the world leader, which produces 13 per cent of its electricity from wind power, has just called a halt to the programme which has given it the most expensive electricity in Europe, and yielded no reduction in the emission of "greenhouse gases".
Yet at this very moment Mr Blair's advisers in his Policy and Innovation Unit call for an expansion in wind generation which, in order for Britain to equal Denmark's current level of 13 per cent, would require at least 20,000 new turbines, in addition to the 900 we have already.
To see how absurd this is, one has only to consider the proposal to erect 165 two-megawatt turbines over 48 square miles of the Cambrian Mountains in mid-Wales. Each will be around 400 feet high, the size of Salisbury Cathedral or Millbank Tower. Because they cannot operate when winds are either too weak or too strong, they produce only a quarter of their capacity, requiring permanent backup from conventional power stations. Total output will be about enough to provide power for a large village, yet each turbine will require a subsidy of £100,000 a year, and any carbon dioxide emissions it saves will be made up by that emitted from just four container lorries...."
(more)
Feb 25/26 ~ ".. the Government should be "pushing" less damaging
alternatives like wave energy and energy crops" Western Morning News
New Energy Vision by Andy Greenwood (external link)
"...Of major concern to conservationists yesterday was the potential
proliferation of intrusive wind turbines across the Westcountry skyline.
They fear that as the most high profile and readily available
alternative to conventional sources, it will lead to a rash of
applications as the Government increases its "green energy" targets.
Geoffrey Sworder, of the Council for the Protection of Rural England in
the South West, said the Government should be "pushing" less damaging
alternatives like wave energy and energy crops....."
See also the CLA's press release "Don't forget the farmed fuels"
Feb 25/26 ~ real fears were aired in the Westcountry last night that the move
could "steam-roller" through windfarm applications despite local
opposition.
Western Morning News (external link) extract:
"South West Tory MEP Dr Caroline Jackson, chairman of the EU's
environment committee, said recent plans for windfarms in Devon had been
rejected because of local protests.
"This could lead to the Government over-riding local opposition to
windfarms," she said. "If the Government decides that local people will
not have as much opportunity to object, then I think that's bad law, bad
government and a dictatorial approach more relevant to North Korea than
North Devon."..."
Feb 25 ~ United Kingdom
Livestock and Products
Bovine Brucellosis Outbreak in Great Britain
2003
USDA report (pdf file) extract: "A total of thirty six (36) heifers born in early
2000 are understood to have been exported to Scotland from this origin herd in Roscommon, ROI in
May and June of 2002. In accordance with current surveillance procedures in Great Britain, the
animals were apparently all routine blood tested on arrival and at sixty (60) days post-import. The
animals all tested negative for brucellosis between July and September of 2002. All the animals have
been traced to five (5) farms in Scotland where they and their close contacts have been placed under
movement restrictions and kept isolated from other cattle in their respective herds. According to
veterinary advice in Great Britain, all of the imported animals will be culled. Also, further testing and
surveillance of cattle are understood to be continuing to ensure that the outbreak has been eradicated. ......In a separate development but in the light of the brucellosis cases in Scotland, Defra has announced that
three (3) beef animals imported into England from Northern Ireland from a herd which has subsequently
had bovine brucellosis are to be culled. These animals were among five (5) imported into Great Britain
last September. The affected animals and their close contacts were placed under movement restrictions
by Defra following a brucellosis breakdown in the exporting herd in Northern Ireland. According to
Defra, four (4) of the animals, one (1) of which died earlier this year of an indeterminate cause, were
imported to a farm near Middlesborough and the remaining animal went to a holding in Scotland.
According to veterinary advice in Great Britain, this animal will also be culled."
(Our italics)
Feb 25 ~"What is the latest on The Honest Food Bill?
(i.e. the Food Labelling Bill)"It gets its second reading on 7th March- if there is enough time.
I am sure there will be some who would like there not to be enough time. Is there anything we can do to make sure that it is brought up? Maybe we could bring it to the attention of the press and M.P.s the importance of country of origin labelling to British farming and it may be less likely to be overlooked...." writes an anxious farmer. Can anyone help? This bill would appear to be identical to the Food Labelling bill that failed two years ago. Please use FAXYOURMP.com or write a letter to anyone who might be able to urge that this bill is not overlooked.
Feb 25 ~ The big mistake that nearly everyone made back in mid-March 2001..
writes Alan Beat, "
...was to believe that the crisis was "out of control". Only the few people with real expertise in FMD recognised that the "traditional" method of control (rapid slaughter on IPs and DCs plus the movement ban) would work, as it always does, but crucially that case numbers would continue to rise rapidly for the first several weeks due to spread that had already taken place before controls were imposed.
With an election in prospect that meant everything to New Labour, it was very tempting when along came siren voices telling Blair that it was all out of control, it would rage on for months - unless you put us in charge, when we can turn it around quickly with our whizzy hi-tech computer models.
Anderson had been badly disgraced at Oxford and forced to move to Imperial College. Krebs and King, his close mates in the power clique of the Royal Society, saw the opportunity for his comeback. Within days of being supplied with the data, suddenly Anderson's model was official government policy (much later, we learn that this model was based on spread patterns of human HIV - just a bit different from FMD in farm livestock, about which Anderson knew nothing).
Krebs/King/Anderson were clever enough to have timed their intervention to coincide with the peak and rapid decline of the epidemic - there is no shortage of material on past FMD epidemics - so that they could claim all the credit for their new policy!
Blair had his election, Anderson re-gained public acceptibility, King got his knighthood. All counter argument has been consistently and professionally suppressed to ensure that the myth of "success" is accepted by the public.
Any questions?"
Feb 25 ~ "Farmers are
likely not to admit to depression because many don't know what it is. Also
they don't want to let the family down...."
James Morrish from the Rural Stress Information Network. "Many have had farms passed down through generations. They feel they mustn't
be the first generation that fails." Article on BBC news site (external link) "Farmers 'more likely to be suicidal'"...."The study in the British Medical Journal's Occupational and Environmental
Medicine, called for the health of farmers to be carefully monitored in the
aftermath of the foot-and-mouth crisis.
The authors said that witnessing so much death among livestock could give
farmers a fatalistic view of their lives."
But see also Suicide statistics 'played up'
by Fordyce Maxwell in today's Scotsman
"A SURVEY published yesterday claimed that British farmers are twice as
likely to contemplate suicide as the rest of the population.
But the director of Scotland's leading rural charity, closely involved with
talking to many farmers and staff about their problems, said that few, if
any, had led to suicide.
John McDonald, director of the Royal Scottish Agricultural Benevolent
Institution (RSABI), said: "There is a perception that the suicide rate is
higher in farming, but we are not convinced of that. Our view is that it is
played up too much....."
Feb 24/25 ~ 25% of our land could produce
all the nation's transport fuels
Press release from CLA in response to the White Paper on Energy
"Don't forget farmed fuels" says CLA
In immediate response to the Government's White Paper, the CLA
comments that there has been little mention today of the huge contribution
that farmed fuels - biomass, biodiesel, bioethanol can readily make to the
nation's energy needs. Energy crops can make an important contribution to
Heat, electricity and vehicle fuel supplies...."
"... Energy crops remove carbon from the atmosphere, provide
habitat for wildlife, increase rural employment opportunities, and add to
fuel security. There are huge opportunities for dealing with green waste
that is currently sent to landfill, for dealing with animal slurries in an
environmentally friendly fashion, and for reducing diffuse pollution,
thereby increasing water quality"
"The potential is enormous. Many food crops are in surplus, and
dumping them on third world countries is unsustainable. The land can produce
a significant proportion of our energy needs. For example, it has been
estimated that using the latest technologies, 25% of our land could produce
all the nation's transport fuels".
Feb 24/25 ~ "...the reality is that the
outcome was already established by people not apparent to the participants."
In her book Educating for the New World Order, American author and educator Beverly
Eakman makes numerous references to the need of those in power to preserve
the illusion that there is "community participation in decision-making
processes, while in fact lay citizens are being squeezed out."
"The Delphi Technique is being used very effectively to change our government
from a representative form in which elected individuals represent the
people, to a "participatory democracy" in which citizens selected at large
are facilitated into ownership of preset outcomes. These citizens believe
that their input is important to the result, whereas the reality is that the
outcome was already established by people not apparent to the participants."
When we consider the spuriousness behind such current words as "consultation", "stakeholders", "openness and transparency" - her words seem relevant.
Feb 24 ~" I eventually realised there was going to be no justice, only the law"
Fordyce Maxwell's article in today's Scotsman about sheep-dip poisoning. "Anderson suspects that at least 2,000 farmers, shepherds and their families have been affected in Scotland alone, most while dipping sheep in chemicals guaranteed to kill pests and parasites such as lice and the sheep scab mite...."
What we find particularly interesting (apart from the extraordinary courage and decency of the man whose life has been so seriously affected) is this extract from the article:" Anderson says: "Elliot Morley, a senior minister with the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, told Annabelle Ewing, MP, that no minutes of that meeting could be found. They certainly can. I have a copy, and they reveal a greater problem with phenols and solvents as well as unsatisfactory guidance on protective clothing than people were previously aware of."
He finds it difficult to blame farmers. His recent settlement did not include a confidentiality clause, something he interprets as an invitation to be free to criticise publicly the farmer who allowed sheep dip to contaminate his water supply. He does not plan to do that.
"Even after 13 years of hell I sympathise with farmers who have been affected by exposure to sheep dips. They didn't know what they were dealing with and proper instruction leaflets and guidance were either not given or unhelpful until after many people had their lives ruined."
........
His aims have changed over the years. Legal claims for compensation for OP or sheep dip poisoning have been almost impossible to push through either by groups or individuals.
"I eventually realised there was going to be no justice, only the law....."
(read article)
Feb 24 ~ Gold-plated
bureaucracy
Telegraph letter from David Lidington
Sir - Boris Johnson (Comment,
Feb 20) is spot-on about the impact of new European Union rules on the
disposal of sheep and other animals that die on the farm.
But
decisions of our own Government have made matters worse. National
governments were able to get opt-outs from the regulations for remote
areas of their countries. British ministers took advantage of this only
for parts of the Scottish Highlands. They did not even seek derogations
for places such as Snowdonia, Cumbria or Exmoor, where hill farmers now
face extra costs and huge practical difficulties.
Bureaucratic
rules from Europe are bad enough. What adds insult to injury is when they
are gold-plated here in Whitehall.
David Lidington MP
(Cons), Shadow secretary of state, Environment, Food and Rural Affairs,
London SW1
Feb 24 ~" The technology is becoming an essential component of modern disease surveillance systems."
From the OIE website (external link)
Decision-support tools for foot and mouth disease control
R.S. Morris, R.L. Sanson, M.W. Stern, M. Stevenson & J.W. Wilesmith
Rev. sci. tech. Off. int. Epiz., 2002, 21 (3), 557-567
Summary
"Recent experience with foot and mouth disease (FMD) has shown that large and very costly epidemics can occur in countries considered extremely unlikely to experience the disease. The consequences of an introduction are much more severe than in the past and effective control is more difficult to achieve. Few countries have developed effective risk management strategies and information-based response systems to respond to these developments.
The authors describe the tools which can be employed to minimise the impact of a disease incursion, using the example of FMD. To make such systems effective, the development of a national farms database in advance, including geo-referencing, is highly desirable. This greatly enhances the power of the decision-support tools, which can then be applied as soon as a serious disease incursion has been detected. These tools include- procedures to detect infected farms promptly,
- to protect as yet uninfected farms against exposure to virus
- and to manage control policies.
Epidemiological evaluation and prediction tools have advanced particularly rapidly and can guide the choice of control policies during an outbreak. Integrated decision-support systems offer the best method of managing FMD outbreaks to minimise the cost and size of the epidemics."
Detect, protect and manage do seem the key words for an FMD policy. The new tests and diagnostic technology are in place elsewhere. One can only hope that those advising the UK Government are aware of them and able to change the knee-jerk 'kill everything' response of the recent dreadful past.
Feb 24 ~".. there is hope for the future.."
On the second anniversary of the FMD disaster in Britain, Alan Beat writes with a measure of optimism in the Editorial of his newsletter - which also contains an interesting exchange about the increasing number of people speaking out against "the system". ..."They (the 'authorities') rely on your consent and cooperation - in reality they can do little to enforce their petty rules when faced with reasoned opposition."
"There is an increasing acknowledgement in high places that mass slaughter on such a vast scale will never be politically acceptable again, and recognition of the role that vaccination and diagnostics should play in future. But resisting the modernisers are the old guard - firmly entrenched, committed, unable or unwilling to change their own prejudice.
Overcoming this mindset is proving to be the hardest battle of all. It must be won if sensible treatment is to replace slaughter as the first and only reaction to every animal disease that happens along." (more)
Feb 24 ~" I can show that they have certainly not acted in accordance with the law in this instance.."
Janet Hughes, although still worried, is feeling a little more positive about the likely outcome of DEFRA's demands for costs. She has written to thank those who have given her support. ".. The media has been very supportive, and our local reporters have done a great job in keeping up the pressure, and getting the information into the public domain. If this had not happened I know things would have been grim for us as a family. It was brilliant to have Christopher Booker highlight the issue on 3 February in the Sunday Telegraph.
Now that I have discovered that the necessary notice was not served on me I can show that they have certainly not acted in accordance with the law in this instance. I have still not been able to track down the High Court reference number for their claim; they have been using my old judicial review claim number from 2001, and should have been issued with their own claim number for the writ..."
Feb 24 ~farm shops work. It's up to us, the customers, to ask the questions..."
Hilary Peters' diary of real food shopping gives us another glimpse of the humane, healthy and successful as she travels to Dairybarn Farmshop near Stockbridge (Hampshire)
. "... it's all about meat. They have their own butcher preparing and selling their own rare-breed beef, lamb, pork, sausages, chicken. They sell more than they produce, so neighbours with rare breeds also sell through them. They guarantee that they know the farms and can vouch for the animals having a happy life. Certainly, their own animals do. I saw Gloucester Old Spot pigs with their piglets. A Belted Galloway cow had just calved.
They also sell their own eggs, local organic vegetables... this sort of shopping would only work if every village had a Dairybarn (and perhaps a village farm).
Feb 23 ~ Pet cow suspected of brucellosis ( test negative) is not slaughtered
Welcome news. Many pet animals were among the several million healthy victims of the FMD policy. From the Journal article (external link) "..... The three animals were among five imported into Great Britain last
September.
The affected animals and contacts were placed under movement restriction as
soon as Defra learnt of the brucellosis breakdown in the exporting herd in
Northern Ireland.
One of the animals had died earlier this year of an indeterminate cause
while the remaining animal went to a holding in Scotland as a pet. It has
tested negative and is not thought to pose any risk as it is not in contact
with any other cattle.
NFU regional spokesman Rob Simpson said: "Brucellosis is not as infectious
as foot-and-mouth disease and even though it is a serious, notifiable
disease the industry should not be panicked ......"
Feb 22 ~ It seems that DEFRA are making good use of the AHB already with the slaughter of cattle with/without brucellosis.
an email from a farmer who is quite aghast at the Telegraph report (external link) "....Defra said at least 200 animals would be slaughtered."
email: "Cows cannot die from brucellosis ! We had a herd of 180 suckler cows who had brucellosis. It can be eradicated and vaccinated against. Its common name is 'contagious abortion' - the cows abort in the last quarter of pregnancy, and any calf which has been aborted must be reported to DEFRA and tested ( this has always happened ).
It has a huge financial effect on a farm as up 25 % or more of the cows in a herd fail to produce a live calf.
Within a herd it is highly infectious. It is spread from the actual calving and infected afterbirth and is worse in housed cattle than outdoors. Outdoors it can be spread from farm to farm by foxes physically taking afterbirth across into another field.
If people get brucillosis, which they can do very easily from calving infected cows, they get ' undulant fever' which is like flu, and there is no cure for it.
So yes, brucellosis needs controlling as it is a serious disease. But not by slaughter of whole herds. This is appalling news.
No doubt DEFRA are using the powers of the AH act to compulsorily slaughter out a whole herd plus so called dangerous contacts.
This has never before happened with a case of brucellosis.
The disease was finally brought under control by the mid / late 70's - not a single cow, let alone a whole herd was slaughtered.
In the early 70's over half the herds in Ireland, Wales and Midlands were infected with br. The last case of ' reported ' br in a herd in this area was only a few years ago. It is around, but usually goes unreported.
Up to the mid 80's, ADAS used to send out a monthly round-up newsletter.
On the back page they reported the current TB and br outbreaks giving the names of the farms.
This was vitally important as farmers like us then knew, and could make their own judgements when going to farm sales advertised in the paper or buying cows / calves at market. Now the whole animal health situation is shrouded in secrecy. Defra refuse to publish the names of farms infected with TB so farmers are unable to protect their herds !..." (email continues below)
Feb 22 ~ "On the subject of TB, what the **** was DEFRA allowing Cumbrian farmers to buy replacement dairy cows from Devon after FMD?
(farmer's email continues): "Every idiot knows that Devon was riddled with TB before FMD. Holsworthy Market was closed for six months the year before FMD due to TB being out of control in the area !
ADAS was the main source of help and info up to then, but the govt ( Conservatives this time ! ) turned it into a profit making business, and ADAS started charging a minimum call out of £70 per hour.
This was just after the IACS's came out and when each farm needed skilled technical help with mapping and completing the never ending forms which suddenly started coming through the post. Forms which had printed on them, next to the place for the farmer's signature, that errors or false information submitted would be subject to a £30,000 fine and three months imprisonment !
This small article on Warmwell (ie on the brucellosis slaughter) could be the start of something far greater than the cullings of FMD 2001, and is presumably the start of the AH Act and DEFRA's new found powers to control disease in farm animals....slaughter everything in sight......with the full weight of the law.....plus police back-up and imprisonment for those farmers who object. "Veterinary advice was to slaughter the whole herd" totally freaked me out..........What vet said this for Christ's sake?........****** unbelievable...
All farms are blood tested for br when the TB testing is done.
So now we have a new rule : one reactor to brucellosis, and the whole herd, plus any direct contact herds will be slaughtered."
Name and address supplied
Feb 22 ~ Brucellosis - "Several hundred cattle are to be slaughtered ....
and emergency restrictions have been placed around at least six herds in the north of England and Scotland after an outbreak of bovine brucellosis. Two animals from the Forfar farm have aborted due to Brucella abortus, the Scottish Executive confirmed." Robert Uhlig in friday's Telegraph (external link)
From FWi (external link) "....They were part of a consignment of 36 animals, imported from Roscommon in the Republic of Ireland in June 2002.
The rest of the consignment was back-traced to five farms in Scotland and the herds have been placed under movement restrictions.
Veterinary advice is that all the imported animals should be killed.
In a separate incident, three animals on a farm near Middlesbrough are due to be culled because they were imported from a farm which has since gone down with brucellosis.
The animals were part of a consignment of five animals - this time imported from Northern Ireland - brought into the north of England last September.
One of the animals has since died, another went to a holding in Scotland, but again the veterinary advice is that they should all be slaughtered."
Feb 22 ~ Double tagging of sheep EU proposals "impractical and unbearable"
From FWi (external link) "Jim Walker, president of National Farmers Union Scotland, said the EU proposals were impractical and unbearable.
Instead, the same tracing system that currently operates in Scotland should be introduced across the European Union.
And he extended another invitation to EU officials to visit Scotland to see the nightmare that the current proposals would inflict on the industry...."
Feb 22 ~"I confirm that Defra will not take any further action against you at the present time."
Janet Hughes writes that a brief letter from DEFRA's legal department seems to offer what might be positive news. This would be one a glimmer of hope in a very grim week. How grateful we should all feel if there are those at DEFRA who can find it possible to relieve Janet's family of the black cloud that has been hanging over them for so long.
Feb 22 ~".... lasting national shame.... all it has done to deal with the next outbreak is pass secondary legislation to give it powers to contiguously cull which it did not have during the 2001 epidemic "
Are We Heading for Another Foot and Mouth Disease Outbreak? (external pdf file) by Professors David Campbell and Bob Lee written towards the end of last year and now on http://www.brass.cardiff.ac.uk. Extract:"...In the end, up to 10 million animals were killed. Perhaps 90% of them were not
infected. The disease was eventually controlled, but only because contiguous culling had
become almost indiscriminate killing in disregard of the economic, human and animal welfare
costs. The direct economic cost is put at up to £10 billion, but this is a remote indication of the
extent of the disaster. There was widespread illegality as MAFF in its panic could not respect
the relevant criminal, public and private laws. In particular, it was impossible to ensure that all
the animals were killed humanely. Very large numbers were criminally killed in ways so
horribly cruel that they should occasion lasting national shame.....
......Those who, like ourselves, eat meat in the belief that livestock will be humanely killed
must realise that, unless there is radical change, this will not be the case. Animals which
provide meat will be killed humanely. But behind them there will inevitably be huge numbers
of animals cruelly killed in the panic, mass slaughter which has been the government's
response to the epidemics which its agricultural policies cause. So far, all it has done to deal
with the next outbreak is pass secondary legislation to give it powers to contiguously cull
which it did not have during the 2001 epidemic, and change the name of MAFF to DEFRA."
Feb 21 ~ "..the bailiffs left no contact number, gave no ID nor notice of authority."
Feb 21 ~ Ministers are considering a clampdown on cattle movements in a bid to halt the spread of the disease.
Emergency movement restrictions like those seen during foot-and-mouth could be imposed because of tuberculosis in cattle. See DEFRA's Discussion paper on TB control policy options that might be adopted
during 2003 which begins with the encouraging words from the TB Forum Secretariat
: "Defra, which was established on 9 June 2001, is the champion of sustainable development. This rôle together with the publication of the Policy Commission report on the Future of Farming and Food, "Farming and Food, a sustainable future", has focused attention on the economic, social and environmental consequences of Government policies including those in the animal health field. In particular, the Policy Commission recommended that:
In view of England's (sic) abysmal animal health record in recent years, Defra in consultation with the industry need to devise and implement a comprehensive animal health strategy."
The champion of sustainable development continues: ".... ......the transparency of implementation would be much improved by translating EU rules into national legislation more clearly"...and suggests: "Defra would like to remake the English legislation to make clear which parts implement EU requirements and which parts implement additional national controls.
...which might include:
- a prohibition on the marketing of live animals from herds with unknown TB status i.e. overdue tests (excluding marketing direct to slaughter);
- the power to ban the sale of milk or the despatch of cattle for slaughter from herds where the farmers refuse to carry out minimum TB testing (e.g. once a year);
- clear reference to the provisions in the Annex to Council Directive 64/432 on how appropriate testing frequencies are assessed and set; and
- pre movement testing and other requirements for the movement of cattle into areas of the country with EU recognition of "officially tuberculosis free region" status or being developed for that recognition.
They would definitely include the three main changes consulted on in 2001: a widening of the obligation to report M.bovis to the authorities, prohibition of the movement of cattle between the two days of testing, clarification of the Department's power to impose movement restrictions on herds where the owner/ keeper refuses to have a test done by the due date."
.....
Read the whole of this document noting the references to the IT database for VetNet (two years away) and the saving of SVS money by rationalising compensation.
Feb 21 ~ FMD policy carried out better in Scotland?
On the second anniversary of the foot and mouth fiasco we remember this testimony from the sheepdrove website. Extract: "...Yesterday morning at 0830 a posse of MAFF officials, a valuer and armed Police arrived, following a curt warning late the previous evening. None of them wore protective clothing or disinfected themselves and they refused to confirm whether they had been in contact with any infected animals during the previous 72 hours. A vet had earlier described the herd as being unusually healthy and in the pink of condition. The farmer had taken every reasonable precaution to protect them. He had been refused a judicial review in the Edinburgh Quarter Sessions the previous day. These cattle showed no sign of being infected, or any more exposed to the virus than the vast majority of healthy animals that have already been slaughtered, or are still alive. The MAFF vet refused to examine them before slaughter or take tests. Although their behaviour was clearly an abuse of their powers and responsibilities under the 1981 Animal Health Act, MAFF pressed ahead with the cull regardless. They had been told to clear the area of all stock by today in order to fill a local pit."
Feb 21 ~ "Thirty months is not a magic number." Sir John Krebs
"It was chosen because few animals develop the clinical stage of the disease by this age even if they are infected...."
On the second anniversary of the foot and mouth crisis, Britain's so-called Animal Health policies, its draconian and illogical rules and regulations, the absurd self-congratulation of DEFRA and government scientists over their handling of disease, their ignorance of and refusal to acknowledge the huge advances made in vaccines, diagnosis and testing elsewhere - all this has deprived us temporarily of the will to live - but do read yesterday's Guardian report (external link) about the OTMS rule. See also BBC report on bovine brucellosis in Scotland. The last case in the UK was reported in 1993. Brucellosis can be treated and it is very low in risk to humans but vets want all the imported cattle slaughtered "to
prevent the spread of the disease."
Any cattle that have been in contact with the infected animals will also be
slaughtered. Cure by slaughter is the sick animal mind set of DEFRA and the SVS.
Feb 21 ~ Defra Dilley-Dalleys over Janet Hughes.
It seems that DEFRA sent out emails yesterday to those who had contacted them asking for a measure of leniency over the Janet Hughes case. Here is the reply Thank you for your email of 1February 2003 concerning the recovery of costs
from Janet Hughes of Montgomery, Powys.
Janet Hughes was ordered by the Court to pay Defra's legal costs following
an unsuccessful Judicial Review claim. The Department has a responsibility
to protect public expenditure. Janet Hughes should have been made fully
aware of the possibility of having to pay costs for unsuccessful litigation
by her legal advisers at the time. Defra has given her a number of
opportunities to put forward payment proposals. No such proposals were made.
Defra had no option but to seek to recover taxpayers' money by taking
enforcement action. Mrs Hughes has now made an offer and we are in
correspondence with her.
Martyn Dilley
One emailer comments dryly, "Well. It may be two years on but DEFRA are just the same.
I wrote a polite letter asking them to draw a line, to please leave her
alone and call it a day.
This is the reply.
Seems that they can waste up to £10 billion poundsworth of tax payers money murdering
nearly 11,000,000 animals and wrecking the lives of thousands of people and even
whole communities (and who is able to seek to recover that?) I asked that they show some compassion in the hope that
maybe they have actually learnt something.
Seems that they will still not listen."
Feb 21 ~ "the newsdesk has been holding onto his reports on the issue," says Janet Hughes
- and adds that there is "Still no response from either the High Court or the judge. It is a week since he received my letter by special delivery so he has had adequate time to reply in the circumstances.
The Western Mail put in a report today. I have complained to them and they have promised to correct it tomorrow. It states that we are "living on donations from people from all the UK."..!! I really do wonder if someone has done it deliberately because the local reporter would certainly not have written that. It seems possible that it is an attempt to put people off giving towards the fund. The local reporter has said that the newsdesk has been holding onto his reports on the issue. The paper seems very much orientated towards the Welsh Assembly - and who knows what DEFRA may be telling the Assembly to do...?"
Feb 20 ~ "....... the remains of a sheep.
Boris Johnson today in the Telegraph on the nonsense of the new rules
It is amazing how quickly this species is reunited with the ground that nurtured it. The crows wade in. The foxes do their stuff. Soon there is nothing left but a litter of bones on the grass, tufts of wool, and a green-toothed skull which you can take home for the entertainment of children.
That is how things have long been done in the combes and brakes of Exmoor, though, like so many other perfectly natural things, this custom is illegal. If the ramblers come across a sheep corpse on your land, they can turn you in. You can be fined. So most farmers have long since been in the habit of burning or burying their dead sheep.
Now, unbelievably, even that punctilious practice is about to be banned. Under the EU Animal By-products regulation of April 30, 2003, you will not be allowed to employ the foxes to eat the sheep; you will not be allowed to bury the beast on your own land. You will have to pay anything between £5 and £10 to have the cadaver removed by an official dead sheep remover.
And why? You might guess that it was because Labour wants to ban hunting, and many farmers rely on the hunt to remove fallen stock. But no: the answer is that the EU's Scientific Veterinary Committee (the gentlemen who banned British beef, and almost wiped out an industry, when it was perfectly safe to eat) have decided that there is some risk to health.
However they calculate that risk, it must be vanishingly small next to the risk of contagion from an itinerant van, proceeding from farm to farm with a cargo of corpses, many of them diseased. You will see how demented this new ruling is when you consider that the Law of England and Wales still permits you to bury your relatives, whole and entire, at the bottom of the garden. Why on earth can't you do the same thing with sheep?....." Read on
Feb 20 ~ Two years ago to the day...
February 20th is a day that will remain in many minds as the start of the blackest, most callous episode in the agricultural history of modern times. Calls from all sides for a proper open public inquiry were simply ignored. One year ago, Peter Ainsworth, then Shadow DEFRA Minister, addressed the Tenant Farmers' Association . .."There remain many questions to be answered by the Government over its handling of Foot and Mouth. When, precisely, did Ministers first become aware that the disease had broken out? Why was there a three-day delay in imposing a total movement ban? Why were Ministers so slow in grasping the need for urgent action? Why was there no contingency plan in place? Why didn't they mobilise local vets? Why did they rule out vaccination? Why was chaos allowed to develop before the army was finally called in to help with the disposal of carcasses? Was contiguous culling carried out legally? Who drew up the maps on which the culling was based? Why does the Prime Minister refer all enquiries to Defra when it was he who assumed personal responsibility for managing the outbreak? "What is certain is that the Prime Minister's stance on the issue of a Full Public Inquiry into Foot and Mouth has done nothing whatever to heal the growing rift between Government and countryside which was already all too visible before the last Election."
We still are no nearer getting answers. The authorities rejected a full public Inquiry on the grounds that the important thing was to look to the future and not, merely with the benefit of hindsight, carry out a witch hunt . There has been no witch hunt. Quite the reverse - honours have been heaped upon many of the heads that instigated and carried out the policies. And the future? Much of the past has simply been covered up in exchange for who knows what. Decisions are still being made behind closed doors by who knows who. And the future? Still no commitment to vaccination. Still no serious interest in real time diagnosis. Still no properly constructed and sensible contingency planning. Instead, we have a series of draconian new laws further to tie the hands of those who would dissent and to make the killing easier (and legal) next time.
Feb 20 ~ Differentiation of Infection from Vaccination in FMD
Part of Dr James Irvine's article (on the Land-Care.org.uk website)
deals with the section of the FMD Special Edition of State Veterinary Service Journal
written by David Mackay, Epidemiology, Page Street, London.
Dr Irvine comments "... I find it quite extraordinary that Jim Scudamore, the Chief Veterinary Officer and Director General Animal Health and Welfare, in his introduction admits that this article was written before the publication of The Royal Society's report (June 2002)...
David Mackay perpetuates much pseudo-scientific mischief in this article which at this stage of the proceedings is reprehensible.
Much play is made by him of the possible role of carriers and talking about how vaccination prevents disease but does not prevent infection. .... Fortunately, experience throughout the world does not support this. ....
There have been numerous outbreaks of FMD in other parts of the world where vaccination has been used, but where are the results of studies done in the field that could surely have established the point one way or another? Is it because Pirbright have been looking after their own commercial interests and not co-operating with others as they should in their capacity as a World Reference Centre .. ? It defies belief that in 2003 this point has apparently not yet been comprehensively addressed.
No reference is made to the use of on-site tests for FMD virus that are in an advanced state of development.
The author does not define what he means by a carrier. ...
.....The author did not come clean and say that the vaccine sent up to Cumbria from Pirbright for possible use was an old 1990 vaccine that they had in store. Modern type vaccine licensed for use and suitable for the employment of differential serological diagnostic testing was available but not mobilised. Why not? .....
What is also reprehensible about this article is that the only reference given at the end of it is to a journal published in 1998.
The Royal Societies of London and Edinburgh after taking extensive evidence both concluded that the importance of the carrier state - much trumpeted in this chapter by David Mackay - is over-emphasised...(Read Dr Irvine's article in full)
Feb 20 ~ "..... Foot and Mouth Disease the answer must surely be through the use of vaccination as a first line of defence -
not as a persistent after-thought. So persistent an after-thought that it never actually happens, because by then it is too late." Dr James Irvine has written (on the Land-Care.org.uk Website)
"...it is a pity that this special publication giving the views of the State Veterinary Service could not have been available on-line in June 2002. .......
There is also no excuse in terms of lacking the technology for putting the publication on-line much more promptly. If DEFRA cannot achieve this simple form of communication, how are we supposed to have confidence that it will communicate effectively in the face of a new outbreak of FMD?
The trouble with this publication being in-house with no peer review is that it exclusively gives the views of DEFRA and its staff, who not surprisingly describe what a good job they did and how hard they all worked. This however is not the view of the many who suffered the consequences of their actions, or lack of preparedness for such an outbreak
Also worrying is the apparent continuing resistance of DEFRA to adopt the recommendation of the EU that vaccination be considered as a first line defence...(Read the full article with references and footnotes)
Feb 20 ~little progress appears to have been made as the second anniversary of the start of the UK 2001 FMD epidemic approaches ...
Dr James Irvine's article concludes:"........
Sensible tagging requirements and sensible standstill arrangements, coupled with rapid on farm diagnosis are likely to be the most effective means of identifying and controlling a new outbreak.
Should it appear at all probable that the disease will spread beyond an immediate stamping out in the area, vaccination should be implemented without delay using modern type vaccines that are available now (and have been since 1997).
Consideration should be given to farm staff administering the vaccines as on most farms they are well experienced in such a routine procedure in relation to a variety of other diseases......
The public should be reassured now that there is no hazard whatsoever to their health from eating meat from vaccinated animals, and prohibitions should be placed on supermarkets or anyone else if they suggest that there is.
What is distressing is what little progress appears to have been made as the second anniversary of the start of the UK 2001 FMD epidemic approaches next week..."
(Dr Irvine, FRSE, DSc,FRCPEd, FRCPath, FInst Biol.
is a former member of the Royal Society of Edinburgh FMD Inquiry. See also his comments on vaccination and rapid diagnostic testing)
Feb 20 ~ The film - In the Shadow of Foot and Mouth -
has been chosen as a contender in the Celtic Film Festival to be held in Belfast on 5th April. This should ensure more people will view the film.
We wish the film and its producer, Rex Pyke, the very best of luck with this. Quita Allender's comments about the film.
Feb 20 ~ FARMING TODAY THIS WEEK Saturday 15 February
The BBC says, "The world's worst outbreak of foot and mouth disease began in Britain two years ago next week. The six billion pound cost to the economy is well documented; we know over seven million animals were culled - but what about the impact on human health.
For the first time the Regional Health Authority in Cumbria is carrying out a study looking at the effect of the crisis on those most closely involved. It has found evidence that people are still experiencing trauma on a daily basis, but it doesn't have the funding to counsel them.
Miriam O'Reilly who followed the story of foot and mouth from day one, revisits Cumbria and some of the people she met in the dark days of the epidemic." We must forgive the BBC their inaccuracies about numbers because the programme was unmissable. (Find it on this page) It came
from Cumbria - FMD 2 years on - included were:- interviews with Nick and Joan
Fish who had dead cows outside the house for 10 days. Their baby son became
silent when the animals were killed - and remained so until the farm was restocked.
- a
slaughterman who broke down during the interview.
- Peter Tiplady (Northern
area health authority) said that every one of the 54 people they are
following through in their study suffer daily flashbacks.
- David Black,
local vet said 95% of the practice's large animal clients lost their stock
....DEFRA wonders why so many of us still cannot stop going over and over the tragically avoidable events of 2001and trying to find a sane and humane solution to animal disease.
Feb 19 ~ Sir John Krebs: "However, in the UK in particular, the control of both BSE
and Foot and Mouth disease have probably done much to put consumers' minds
at ease."
Not for those of nervous disposition or high blood pressure is this latest bit of self-congratulation from the FSA in something called Food Production Daily (external link) As one chuckling and disrespectful emailer puts it, "Comedy turn aren't they? If Krebs
did not exist, you would not believe him possible."
Feb 19 ~ "...almost universal criticism of the expanded culling powers and their conflict with the basic human rights of the farming community"
See this commentary on the Animal Health Bill by barrister Stephen Tromans - It is more important than ever now to know its precise terms. "It is not necessary that the animal should have been, or be thought to have been, affected by or exposed to the disease, or to have been in contact with animals so affected, or whether it has been vaccinated against the disease. This is made clear by the new sub-para. 3(1A), introduced by subs. (3).
By s. 87(1) of the 1981 Act, the "animals" to which the power applies are cattle, sheep, goats and all other ruminating animals and swine. Under that section, it is however possible for the Minister by order to extend the definition of animals much more broadly.
Human Rights Act 1998 ....
There would appear to be two distinct but related issues. The first is whether a decision to slaughter in any given case is unlawful under s. 6(1) of the 1998 Act as incompatible with Convention rights.
The power to slaughter is discretionary, and thus it cannot be argued under s. 6(2)(a) that the Minister could not have acted differently.
The most obviously relevant provision of the Convention is the requirement that no one shall be deprived of his possessions .....What is required is that a proper balance should be struck in each case between the interests of the individual and the broader public interest. This must entail some form of risk assessment.
Further, under the principle of proportionality, the decision maker should consider whether there are other and less damaging means by which the public interest could be protected, such as vaccination ... ."
Read the whole commentary
Feb 19 ~" The High Court has still not acknowledged my application, even though I have telephoned them and written to them twice"
Janet Hughes' nightmare continues: " I have received a letter from DEFRA Legal Dept demanding £150 per month, or if am prepared to pay £200 per month they will waive the interest. They are stating that interest is still accruing - which is incorrect as it should have stopped as soon as the writ was issued at the High Court.
The High Court has still not acknowledged my application, even though I have telephoned them and written to them twice.
Effectively they are demanding approximately a quarter of our income, and if I am unable to pay, then they appear to feel able to seize my car, so preventing my gaining any employment.
I really do find it astonishing that they feel able to act in this manner when the case has yet to be decided in the European Court of Human Rights.
They state that their "offer is open for 14 days", and if they do not hear from me then they will consider their options. "
Feb 19 ~
" I can announce that Defra, with the devolved administrations in Wales and Scotland, will this year be reviewing the TB strategy for Great Britain." Mrs Beckett
FWi (external link)
"...Farm leaders and conservationists will be asked to contribute to an informal consultation on TB controls later this spring.
A formal 12-week consultation paper on the issue will follow this summer.
Brian Jennings, a former chairman of the NFU animal health committee, told Mrs Beckett that TB was a "creeping paralysis" running through the cattle industry.
Producers could not afford to wait until 2006 for the outcome of badger culling trials, he said. An interim strategy was needed...."
Mrs Beckett and the NFU could do worse than listen to Bill Wiggin MP (Leominster), for example, whose views on vaccination rather than slaughter for animal diseases such as FMD and bovine TB are well known in Parliament. "As we progress, we must look towards a prophylactic vaccination policy. If it does not currently exist, the Ministry might, when it has finished examining cow and sheep brains, find the funds to promote more positive vaccination policies..... " (quotation from Hansard 2001) (external link)
Feb 19 ~"the real problem is that a commercially viable vaccine might not be found... If one is found, the Government must insist that it is produced, or in some way make it economically viable to produce." Bill Wiggin MP
February 12 2003 " The Minister will be aware of how concerned I have been about the crisis facing cattle owners in the United Kingdom. There are several problems with the current situation. The Krebs trials, as they are known, will probably not produce a conclusive result. The huge amount spent on research into tuberculosis is spent mainly on human tuberculosis. Does my hon. Friend agree that the real problem is that a commercially viable vaccine might not be found? If one is found, the Government must insist that it is produced, or in some way make it economically viable to produce..."
At the end of the debate Mr Morley said; "Important points were made about bovine tuberculosis. Although that subject falls slightly outside the terms of this debate, it is important. We are financing vaccine research, and I shall be only too pleased to give more details when I appear before the DEFRA Select Committee, which is quite rightly looking into the issue."
Feb 19 ~ The Office of Fair Trading is writing to suppliers' organisations and
the supermarkets...
... "to see if any changes need to be made in their Code of
Practice"
Responses requested by 28 March..(Concern that Wal-Mart looks set to get Safeway makes this even more timely).The Code followed a Competition Commission report in October 2000,
which recommended a code of practice to put relations between
supermarkets and their suppliers on a clearer and more predictable
basis.
The OFT is today writing to a wide variety of suppliers'
organisations and the supermarkets themselves. The OFT is asking for
views on the Code and how it has been working in practice. Responses
have been requested by 28 March.
At the end of the review, the OFT will report on whether the Code is
working effectively and whether it should be changed....See press release
Feb 18 ~ Robin Feakins is given leave to appeal
The Feakins' case against Maff/Defra was heard in November 2002. MAFF/DEFRA burned thousands of FMD slaughtered animals on Mr Feakins' farm. Only then was it realised that some of the cattle had been over 5 years old. Material which may contain the prions thought to be responsible for BSE has to be handled with extreme care and disposed of in the most secure manner possible. Mr Feakins' lawyers argued that the removal of pyre ash and debris directly to landfill would be unlawful for any one of 4 reasons:
- it would be a breach of the domestic Animal By-Products Order 1999 (SI 1999/646);
- it would be a breach of the 1990 EU Animal Waste Directive (90/667);
- it would be a breach of the EU TSE Regulation (999/2001);
- it would be a breach of the domestic TSE Regulation (SI 2002/843).
The Ministry's position on (1) appears to have rested on the arguments that the Animal By-Products Order 1999 (SI 1999/646) did not bind the Crown ( "Crown Immunity").
On (2)-(4) the Ministry said they were entitled to take advantage of similarly worded EU derogations, permitting them to dispose of ash and parts of carcases by burial when there was a shortage of processing capacity caused by an epizootic disease.
Mr Feakins' side said that the situation has to be viewed now, not from the viewpoint of March 2001. Since there isn't a widespread epizootic disease outbreak now - if there is a shortage of capacity something else is causing it. However, we heard on Dec 20 2002 that the Judge thought fit to agree with the Ministry.
Robin Feakins has now been granted permission
to appeal by the Court of Appeal, in respect of the Judge's ruling that what
the Ministry proposed complied with the EU & UK TSE Regs.
So, for the Ministry, ever eager to goldplate EU rules to the detriment of UK farming, now possibly to be in difficulties because it failed to
bring UK law into line with EU law - this is indeed an irony.
Feb 18 ~ TB is now raging through our herd
Here again is an interesting article that has been on the website for some time Bovine TB A Black and White Issue?
"...As a working farmer... I have hung minerals on metal gates, installed high water troughs, not grazed silage headlands and kept a closed herd, (i.e one that is completely home bred) for the last 6 years. Herd health is excellent, and we vaccinate for BVD (Bovine Viral Diarrhoea), which is suspected of compromising cattle test results. We test the cattle annually, and have no contact with any other cattle, being ring fenced by roads, woods or rivers.
All very healthy, bio secure and 'holistic'.
Did it protect us? Not a chance. TB is now raging through our herd, which was established in 1908, and accredited (TB free) in 1952. So where do we go from here?..."
With even the NFU suggesting vaccination perhaps a real effort can now be made, as Tim Bennett said, to "bring together the best science we can find around the world, look at what everyone else is doing around the world and perhaps try to find some fresh thinking on this" instead of the dreadful "cure by slaughter" approach of Dark Ages DEFRA. Dr Ruth Watkins wrote: "Could we use BCG vaccine....Dr Mark Doherty from the Statens Serum Institute in Denmark that manufactures BCG and PPD..has worked on human and animal infection with Mycobacterium bovis. Badgers can be immunised orally with BCG, they love chocolate so Dr Doherty suggested they could be given chocolate containing BCG..." See also Nature.com "The researchers from Statens Serum Institute in Copenhagen, Denmark have developed an oral vaccine that boosts immunity to protective levels in adult mice that had already been given the BCG vaccine."
Feb 18 ~ "The behaviour of DEFRA beggars belief. Christopher Booker's Notebook in the Telegraph of 3rd February 2003 reveals just how nasty they really are"
This is the refreshingly forthright conclusion of Dr James Irvine FRSE, DSc,FRCPEd, FRCPath, FInst Biol.
Former Member of the Royal Society of Edinburgh FMD Inquiry on reading about the Janet Hughes affair.
He writes: "DEFRA have been the cause of extensive and deep grief - yet they pursue legal costs and send in the bailiffs to the home of an environmental science teacher and her son when they need not have done. Why? Apparently because the appeal judge reckoned that if a Government minister thought that a cull was necessary then that opinion must be accepted. This in the face of the huge row over whether or not the contingency cull was legal, which it wasn't.
It is common knowledge that DEFRA's policies during the UK 2001 FMD crisis have been extensively and severely criticised (1).
No wonder the government did everything to avoid a proper public enquiry - it might have opened the eyes of the judge if there had been. So the law is useless against Governmental policies that are legally flawed. The Government Department in question clearly has no heart. Sounds like real third world stuff. The "system" should be deeply ashamed." Read on Dr Irvine's website under the simple headline "Nasty Defra"( See also Dr Irvine's clarification of an earlier comment on BSE/CJD infectivity on warmwell)
Feb 18 ~" A hypothetical epidemic of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD), maliciously started
was the subject for the second U.S. Defense Department simulation exercise on February 11, 2003." writes Mike Meredith.
His report is available at:
http://www.aasv.org/news/story.php?id=466 the website of the American Association of Swine Veterinarians (external links). U.S. Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld has initiated these crisis management simulations ...According to Major General Gregory Gardner "Foot-and-mouth disease is by far our biggest threat".
"
Feb 18 ~ the BBC Radio Interview of Nicola Morris on the subject of the contiguous cull :
Also at this URL (external link) 4 can be seen this review of "...On the other side of the Atlantic, in the same week as "Silent Prairie", BBC radio 4 was exploring the impact of the notorious "Contiguous Cull" which formed part of the control of the world's worst FMD epidemic in 2001. A moving interview of a farmer on the receiving end illustrated the human trauma and the lasting Government/Industry relationship damage that can ensue from inflexible and remote implementation of FMD controls.
Farmer Nicola Morris watched in horror as the 2001 'foot and mouth' epidemic ravaged Britain's livestock. She was terrified that her own herd of dairy cows would catch the disease and took exceptional biosecurity precautions to protect them. As the situation escalated she became increasingly aware that her herd might be slaughtered in error, caught up in the Ministry of Agriculture's chaos and panic as the epidemic slipped out of control. When a Ministry veterinarian rang to say that her cattle were deemed to be 'contiguous' to a case of foot and mouth and would have to be culled, Nicola refused point blank to allow it to happen. Under animal health legislation introduced in the wake of the FMD epidemic she would now face imprisonment for taking such a stand against mindless panic-driven bureaucracy. As it was, Nicola courageously stood up against inexpert official pressure and herd herd survived. .."
Feb 17 ~ Tim Bennett says we need a fresh approach to bovine TB
See EFRA examination of witnesses Feb 10th 2003
Tim Bennett Deputy President NFU "....... I think we have got to start to try to think of some fresh ideas in this debate. This is a disease that is now costing the country and the industry a serious amount of money, it is damaging our reputation across the whole of Europe now, because this is yet another disease we cannot seem to contain, which obviously is worrying, in terms of the reputation of British agriculture, and I think all solutions, and in particular I would draw attention to a more rapid development of vaccine, have to be looked at. I think we have got to bring together the best science we can find around the world, look at what everyone else is doing around the world and perhaps try to find some fresh thinking on this. "
(See some fresh thinking on the subject of bovine TB)
Feb 17 ~ Michael Meacher to resign?
From the Sunday Times "...Meacher criticises the prime minister's campaign to promote the advantages of GM technology by stating bluntly that the crops are "not necessary" and present an unquantifiable risk to human health.
The government's official position is that no decision will be made on GM farming in Britain until crop trials finish later this year, but Meacher makes his total opposition to the project clear in the interview.
He also takes a sideswipe at his colleague Lord Sainsbury, the science minister, who he implies cannot be relied upon for an objective viewpoint on the issue because of his financial links to various biotechnology firms.
........ We have been feeding ourselves perfectly adequately since overcoming problems of hunger in our early existence. GM is not necessary."
.....in his interview Meacher questions whether big business can be trusted to admit to any safety concerns it discovers while testing GM crops.
Pointing out that the government does not have the funds or manpower to conduct its own trials, the minister says: "The question is: can we trust the companies and be sure that they are telling us all they know?......As far as I know the only way (Sainsbury) seeks to avoid this conflict of interest is by absenting himself when decisions are taken. And as far as I know that is all he does." ....
It will be a sad day for the last vestiges of the present government's credibility when Michael Meacher resigns. He puts the good of the country before his personal ambitions. This makes him unpopular with his colleagues - but not with the rest of us.
Feb 17 ~ the once mighty and now impotent NFU. Rigid in its refusal to allow any
semblance of democracy
Sunday Telegraph article by Oliver Walston: "Connoisseurs of the macabre should travel to Warwickshire this
week to witness a large and ancient corpse twitch convulsively. I refer, of
course, to the annual general meeting of the National Farmers Union, which will
take place on Tuesday. If ever an organisation was past its sell-by date, it is
the once mighty and now impotent NFU. Rigid in its refusal to allow any
semblance of democracy, riven by internal tensions, its income and membership in
free-fall, the NFU is this year 99 years old - and shows its age.....This council is today a tightly-knit oligarchy of 86 self-important men and three women, who ensure that, in the time-honoured tradition of Buggins' Turn, the leadership is selected from within the group. Out of this stagnant pool the president emerges, unsullied by anything as sordid as democracy.
One month ago the council met to consider a request from the Wakefield and Leeds branches, which respectfully suggested that in the 21st century it might not be an entirely bad idea to allow individual members of the NFU to vote for the union's leaders by postal ballot.......A directly-elected president will probably come from the west and may well be a man who prefers blocking motorways to having cups of tea in Whitehall. Yet at least he will bring with him a vigour and a blast of fresh thinking that has been missing in the NFU for generations. No wonder the British public increasingly regards farmers as jokes or tragedies. And sometimes both."
Feb 17 ~ " the helpless ignorance of children, even in Winchcombe, who have never seen a cow"
"........Carlos would like to develop the PYO potential of this glorious site. He would like to invite the public in to sit in the orchards and enjoy the spectacular view. He would like pupils from his children's school to come and learn about farming. He is struck by the helpless ignorance of children, even in Winchcombe, who have never seen a cow.....Opposition, inevitably, comes from neighbours, who see the site as untidy, and the landlord, who wants to turn it into a housing estate........
Carlos was marching, with his family (on Saturday).
From my experience of the Foot and Mouth year, I know now that you can have all the good arguments, you can have scientific backing, you can have right on your side, but if your cause does not fit in with some hidden economic plan, you will not get a hearing." Hilary Peters' ediary of real farm food has been updated.
Feb 17 ~ Janet Hughes' property is still under threat from DEFRA
Janet Hughes writes, " I have received a letter from the Sheriff's office informing me that they have removed Matthew's jeep and quad bike from the seizure list, but everything else remains on it including my car - which is essential to me for potential employment. This is in spite of my offer to DEFRA to pay £30 per month. Apparently DEFRA is still considering the offer.
A DEFRA press officer has told a reporter on the Daily Post (North Wales), that they were unaware of my appeal to the European Court of Human Rights. Therefore, I do wonder if they have assumed that I did not in fact make an application to the ECHR, even though I fully informed DEFRA Legal Dept in the spring of 2002 that I was intending to make the application.
The whole case of the Brecon Brecons is in the ECHR as well as the issue of a fair hearing in the courts, and the issue of costs. Eight months have now elapsed since I made the application . A decision may be forthcoming in the next few weeks as admissibility decisions can take up to a year."
Feb 14 ~ emphasis on carriers and
persistent infection
What concerned us about section 22 of DEFRA's State Veterinary Journal on differentiated tests is their emphasis on carriers and
persistent infection. The implication is that vaccination makes carriers -
something that we have surely all been at pains to refute. The implication
also is that vaccination won't work until a marker test can differentiate
recovered animals from so-called persistently infected ones - yet the writer does
not go on to explain that this - for all practical purposes - does not
matter.
Paul Sutmoller has paused on his way to Venezuela to write:
"...You do not have to differentiate between recovered animals and carriers. The important thing is to differentiate between - vaccinated animals that are not infected and
- vaccinated animals that are infected."
Our understanding is that the success of such marker vaccines were announced by Intervet, for example, in March last year.
We are expecting further informed comment shortly.
Feb 14 ~ the "first and only bit of common sense to come out of the EU"
FWi reports today that "...Brussels has backtracked on its initial proposal and has deemed that it will be up to member states to decide what they charge for (abattoir) inspections - as now.
In the meantime, current Meat Hygiene Service inspection charges will continue at £3 a head for smaller plants and about £2 a head for bigger slaughterhouses.
John Chadwick, chairman of the Small Abattoir Federation, welcomed the move, but added it was the "first and only bit of common sense to come out of the EU".
He remained concerned about other impending regulations, like a ruling banning the dumping of waste blood from plants on land, due to be implemented from June.
Mr Chadwick warned that the administration of collecting and storing waste blood would cripple at least 100 small and medium-sized abattoirs." (external link)
Feb 14 ~ Janet Hughes' cheque already processed - but High Court denies receiving the application
The extraordinary case of Janet Hughes becomes more and more bizarre. She writes today:
"I have found out this afternoon that the cheque which accompanied my application for a 'stay of execution' sent on 31 January , was processed by the High Court but they maintain that they have not received the application. When I have telephoned them they have told me they are unable to find it, and there has been no reply to a letter which I faxed through last Monday.
Do the Courts not realise that a record of the cheque payment is at my bank and that this is proof that they received the application? This issue is also going to be included in the remaining documents that I am sending to the ECHR next week.
We now have over £4,000 in donations and I shall be asking DEFRA if they are prepared to take even more tax-payers' money. Any donations not used towards the costs will be used for animals. ...."
For those who are not yet aware of how much she has been through please see the Janet Hughes page
Feb 14 ~ BSE and Infectivity
We have received the following from Dr James Irvine (Land Care org.uk) after our comment on the article below
"With regard to the commercial announcement of preliminary claims of a new way
of isolating and concentrating prions from tissue samples (including blood),
I think this is interesting and have said so on Land-Care. TSE's are
transmissible (as the name implies) given favourable conditions for this to
happen. Whether one calls them infectious or not is perhaps a touch pedantic.
Your correspondent, if I remember correctly, said you could not "catch" BSE
and by implication other TSE's such as vCJD. Unfortunately there is major
concern that that is exactly what you can do, if transfused by blood or given
blood products that have originated at least in part from an individual
incubating vCJD. Hence the major potential importance of the research using
membrane technology.
The technology also has great potential for studying BSE in cattle and
Scrapie in sheep at the early stages of these diseases, whether or not one
believes that prions are involved. It should help establish whether they are,
and, if they are, it would be potentially an invaluable tool to detect early
disease. The research may well not turn out to be as promising as one might
hope, but that research certainly needs to be done and as quickly as possible."....... Received Feb 18 " It could lead to a great reduction in scaremongering (6) if we could get that reassurance". .... Dr James Irvine, on Land Care Org has made more clear a comment from Feb 14th following some debate about the new work of commercial company Gradipore "to remove the protein that causes mad cow and other neuro-degenerative diseases from blood samples".
Pat Rickett wrote, "Dr. James Irvine states on Warmwell (14 Feb 2003) that CJD is transmissable by blood transfusions - please would he say if any of the known cases of CJD have been transmitted in this way or are his assertions the result of laboratory tests, if so, what are they? Layman's language please!"
Dr Irvine replied with this clarification on his own website. Extract:"There have been no proven cases of transmitting CJD via blood transfusions or from the use of blood products. Nevertheless there is a risk (however small) that this might happen .....Unfortunately there is major concern that that is exactly what may happen, if transfused by blood or given blood products that have originated at least in part from an individual incubating vCJD..."
Feb 14 ~ The European MP who is writing a crucial report on the viability of new sheep identification proposals is Gordon Adam
This may or may not fill readers with unease. See today's Newcastle Journal ".... The proposals have been greeted with dismay and horror by North-East sheep producers who say they are completely unworkable and would actually undermine traceability of sheep in this country."
Feb 14 ~ State Veterinary Journal, Volume 12, number 1, 2002
has just appeared on the DEFRA website. It is their
Foot and mouth disease special edition
PB6573 It evidently considers the performance of the SVS during the horrors of 2001 highly successful. Section 22 on differential tests contains the following: "
Principle and practice of differential tests
Test to detect antibody to Non Structural (NS) proteins Naove animals, which have never been exposed to FMD viral antigens, may be either become vaccinated or infected (sic). Infected animals all ultimately eliminate the virus and become recovered but some animals will remain persistently infected carriers for a considerable period of time before virus elimination takes place. (our italics) Detection of antibody to NS proteins is useful to detect infected animals, whether or not they have also been vaccinated, but does not differentiate recovered animals which have eliminated the virus from those that remain persistently infected carriers. (our italics)
In the case of FMD, the use of the term 'differentiate' is actually a misnomer as it implies that the two states are mutually exclusive and that animals can be either infected or vaccinated. In fact, vaccination prevents disease but does not prevent infection or the establishment of the carrier state and an animal can be both vaccinated and infected. (Figure 1). In this context therefore, what is actually required is a diagnostic test that can detect infected animals, whether or not they have also been vaccinated. Better still would be a serological test that can differentiate animals that are persistently infected from those that have successfully eliminated the virus.
But why this concern about vaccinated animals? There is much more chance of getting FMD carriers among unvaccinated cattle and sheep with clinical or subclinical FMD. Our understanding from the world renowned experts such as Dr Paul Sutmoller and Dr Simon Barteling is that this worry about so-called "persistently infected carriers" is a red herring to muddy the waters of the vaccination debate. See Dr Paul Sutmoller's presentation at the government Royal Society Inquiry session on Vaccination. Jan 15th 2002 of which this is a very short extract: "....Carriers or persistently infected animals
- Researchers have been unable to show that carriers cattle transmit FMD to susceptible contacts
- All experimental evidence of FMD virus transmission by carrier sheep is negative
- Pigs do not become carriers
- Vaccinated cattle or sheep exposed to FMD virus have a much smaller chance of becoming a carrier than susceptibles exposed to FMD virus
- "Vaccinated" carriers were no problem during the FMD eradication by vaccination in South America
Carriers or persistently infected animals
- The fear that vaccination causes FMD carriers and interferes with the eradication effort is completely hypothetical and scientifically unfounded
We are therefore puzzled by the emphasis of these paragraphs in Section 22 and would welcome comment.
Feb 14 ~ "...if this was a success, one would not like to see a failure."
The Power to Panic "... It did indeed prove to be the case that the combined forces of the apparatuses of the U.K. state, including its army, wielded by C.O.B.R. had a greater capacity to kill domesticated animals than F.M.D. to spread, once animal movement restrictions were in place, and D.E.F.R.A. has claimed this as a success.[xlii] But, to state the obvious, if this was a success, one would not like to see a failure. If we may quote ourselves, the epidemic:
caused an economic loss which D.E.F.R.A. estimates to be £9 billion. This figure is but a remote expression of the concrete losses, which include:- the premature deaths of over 10 million animals, killed in ways which were almost always unacceptably, indeed criminally, inhumane and very often so horribly cruel as to be an occasion of lasting national shame;
- the loss of irreplaceable special breeds;
- the horror experienced by those with a scrap of humanity involved in the cull;
- the misery of thousands of small farmers and small businesspersons in areas related to farming and tourism whose incomes were drastically reduced, some of whom were driven into bankruptcy;
- the (continuing) pollution caused by the disposal; the frustration of the enjoyment of the countryside for a year.
It was a set of circumstances which M.A.F.F. did not understand then and D.E.F.R.A. does understand now..." (More)
Feb 14 ~" I have written to the judge, Mr Justice Stanley Burnton, who made the order for costs against me on 11 October 2001..."
writes Janet Hughes, "...and I have requested a meeting with him in order to try to discover his reasons for making the costs order against me - this in spite of the Civil Procedure Rules supplementary notes (external link) to part 54 which state that if a defendant or other party attend a permission hearing for judicial review ( which the hearing on 21 August was in fact ), then the court will not generally make an order for costs against the claimant ( myself)."
Feb 14 ~ "Most of the (RCVS) College's activities are carried out under the Veterinary Surgeons Act 1966. The Act is out of date..."
We note that the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons - whose condoning of the behaviour of some of the veterinary surgeons about whom complaints were received during the FMD crisis was one of the most distressing aspects of the aftermath - is expecting to have to make changes as a result of what the government says and does... See RCVS site: ".....the Government is expected to introduce new legislation within the next two or three years. The profession needs to be prepared for any introduction and decide what improvements it wants in the statutory framework. A new Act will also provide an opportunity to make changes in the light of the recommendations of the RCVS Education Strategy Steering Group.
The RCVS Council has not yet taken a view on what changes would be desirable. Before doing so it wishes to hear what the profession thinks. The College would welcome comments from individual veterinary surgeons and from veterinary organisations on any of the issues raised in the paper, and in particular on the questions which are listed in the annex (external link).
We recall Roger Windsor's words during the crisis: "the College (Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons) should have led the way in condemning what I call "postcode slaughter"
- the indiscriminate and unnecessary slaughter of animals because of where they are, - and I have tried to prod the College to action, but the response, particularly from the Registrar has been that we must not offend MAFF...... The sorry story of vets examining herds and flocks of animals and when finding them free from disease signing the Form A declaring the farm to be an infected place, will forever be a blot on the reputation of MAFF..... Vets were told by senior members of our profession that if they did not sign a Form A, then the livestock would be killed and the farmer would receive no compensation. Farmers were told that if they did not co-operate in the slaughter of their sheep then their cattle would be taken as well. Doors were broken down by police to tear away pet goats from young girls. A retired vet in Dumfries who lived in the wrong place had his goats killed although there was a large housing estate between him and the infected farm. He had been involved with the '67 outbreak, knew the disease and volunteered to keep his animals under close observation. The animals were killed..... "
Feb 14 ~ "The animal record and epidemiological information available to M.A.F.F. was so poor that the course of the epidemic or even the numbers of infected animals will never be known with reasonable accuracy.
The Power to Panic by Professors Lee and Campbell: "[xliii] As we therefore do not even know the real nature and extent of the epidemic,[xliv] the role the cull played, even if it is properly assessed as a firebreak, is extremely unclear. Of course, if one kills all the animals, one stops the epidemic; but the point is to work out where the cost-effective point comes before this, and D.E.F.R.A. has no idea about this. But the 2002 Act purports to legitimate a power to cull which need not stop at 10 million animals. It is difficult to see how, in a future epidemic which did not stop when (or earlier than) the 2001 epidemic did, D.E.F.R.A. will be able to avoid exceeding the 10 million figure, incurring and imposing even greater costs and, in particular, if stamping out without vaccination is used again,[xlv] repeating the horrible cruelty."
Feb 14 ~ " The executive clearly sees the general slaughter power it now enjoys as an important part of these (contingency) plans."
The Power to Panic "....But it was a power exercised ultra vires as a response to the complete failure of contingency planning to identify infection, and it will only ever be used when this has happened again. Slaughter on reasonable suspicion was possible under the 1981 Act; the 2002 Act makes legal what a panic-stricken executive did in excess of the reasonable. There is, of course, no epidemiological practice that can guide a power to slaughter on this basis, for it is done, precisely, in the absence of reliable epidemiology; and so the executive will no more be able to exercise it sensibly now than it did when that exercise rightly was ultra vires. It did not emerge in the course of the debate about the Bill how or when the executive will use the general slaughter power, and it simply was not possible that it could do so.[xlvi]
Frank speaking here would require the executive to admit that its contingency plans for specific slaughter based on identification of the disease may not work, and that it is thereby taking a power to slaughter for reasons it cannot give at any level more precise than that they are "to prevent the spread of a disease".[xlvii] But, of course, frank speaking surely would mean that, even in this Parliament, this Act would never have been passed...." (more)
Feb 13 ~ The Power to Panic: The Animal Health Act 2002 -
a paper by Professors David Campbell and Robert
Lee looks at executive contempt for
the rule of law during FMD and after.
" Executive contempt for Parliament is such common contemporary currency that one would hardly dare trouble the readers of this journal by seeking to bring another example of it to their attention. We nevertheless believe that the Animal Health Act 2002 (2002 Act) displays an arrogance which will be found striking even by this case-hardened readership.[i] During the foot and mouth disease (F.M.D.) epidemic of 2001, the government engaged in ultra vires action on a huge scale, for it had no power to slaughter the majority of the 7 million[ii] animals it nevertheless did slaughter in the course of the "contiguous cull" which became the central plank of its disease control policy.[iii] By passing the 2002 Act, the government has effectively acknowledged that this was so, for the Act seeks to make precisely that which was ultra vires in the past legal in the future, in complete disregard of the compelling reasons for the previous withholding of such powers......
The 2002 Act is an astoundingly conceited refusal to discuss those limits, and, very sadly, they will again become evident only when, in another serious outbreak, D.E.F.R.A. again responds to them by (now legal) panic. Comforted by the illusion of infinite regulatory capacity fostered by its ability to pass legislation like the 2002 Act, the executive is paying little or no attention to the restructuring of the livestock industry that would make it unnecessary to panic. This is no merely formal mistake but, bearing in mind the horror of what happened in 2001, a simply shameful failure. Hayek saw executive contempt for the rule of law not only as deplorable in itself but as a bar to rational policy formulation. The passage of the 2002 Act is very strong evidence indeed for his views.
......
(Read full paper with (now hyperlinked) references)
Feb 13 ~ "This will also enable us to maintain immunity for cattle in areas exposed to infection."
See Harare Herald "Zimbabwe has procured 350 000 doses of vaccines worth US$400 000 from the Botswana Vaccine Institute, to help contain recent outbreaks of the foot-and-mouth disease which is threatening the country's national herd.
Veterinary Services principal director Dr Stuart Hargreaves said yesterday that the first consignment of 250 000 doses was expected this week and would be followed by another batch of 100 000 doses.
He said today, the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) would hand over a further 350 000 doses boosting the department's efforts to contain the foot-and-mouth disease and other diseases affecting the national herd. "This will make an enormous difference for us in the fight against the foot-and-mouth disease," he said. "This will also enable us to maintain immunity for cattle in areas exposed to infection."
Feb 12/13 ~ Apologies for publishing without comment an article implying that BSE is "infectious"
As was swiftly pointed out to us - following the extract below about the company that claims "... you pick up infectious prions at the earliest possible stage, while the animal is still alive, then you can limit the spread of associated diseases and start to look for a cure.."
As the exasperated emailer says: "I notice that the latest experts are now referring to BSE as an Infectious
disease - Prof.Collinge on Radio 4 and now today on Warmwell. Is this new..
or just another invention? The matter of the infectious aspect of BSE can certainly be counted with the rest of the garbage emanating from the SEAC lot. Probably funding time again...
It just amazes me that nobody ever picks these things up. Probably the only thing that is known about BSE ( for sure) is that you cannot catch it!"
Feb 12/ 13 ~ GM compensation for all farmers?
See Guardian story Mr Meacher accepted that: "the public generally lack trust in the government, and fear that the debate may be no more than a PR exercise".
He also accepted that the public wanted to explore why GM was necessary, why it was potentially useful, and why it should be avoided.
There were three studies to be completed before the government made up its mind.
First, the chief scientific adviser, David King, was leading a review of scientific literature, advised by the food standards agency. ..."
For those of us who watched the progress of the FMD policy with growing disbelief and horror, news that Prof David King is going to be working with the FSA is hardly likely to build trust in the government and lay to rest fears that the debate wiull be no more than a PR exercise.
Feb 12/13 ~ "the deeper TB embeds itself
among cattle and badgers the more expensive it will be to root out."
Newcastle Journal NBA calls for urgent action to combat growing bovine TB threat
"New action must be taken immediately before the situation becomes even more
difficult. At present the disease is moving everywhere and the control
policies are going nowhere. The results of the Krebs Trials on the
contribution made by badgers may not be available till 2006.
"Neither the Government or the industry can afford to wait that long.
Feb 12 ~"...frankly I would rather think for myself than have a civil servant cock it up for me. If my product is only worth half, find a better way to raise its value or my income than this insane and wicked bloodletting they will perpetrate again in the name of 'animal health'.."
On a forum for farmers, we read the following: "The policy is at pains to point out that cull, cull, cull is the first line of defence,
or at least that is Page Street's interpretation of it.
Roger Eddy (RCVS) is adamant that if vaccination is to be used it must be implemented quickly-- By definition it won't be.....they will be seeing if (the) cull has contained it while the Modellers get to work to work out what to do.....by which time the threshold will have been crossed and hey, what a surprise -- 'we will owe it to all those who have died to keep killing'.
Meanwhile, the reality that this is about protecting the UK livestock trades from Third World penetration is alluded to but rarely openly discussed; frankly I would rather think for myself than have a civil servant cock it up for me. If my product is only worth half, find a better way to raise its value or my income than this insane and wicked bloodletting they will perpetrate again in the name of 'animal health'.
Meanwhile analysis of the statistics to ascertain what 80% local spread means ,(ie, how much was spread by vets..) is now off the agenda , supposedly fruitless, and anyway it is not necessary as it has served to justify a ten-kilometre, repeat ten kilometre, healthy animal firebreak cull....."
DEFRA's consultation(external link) on FMD control
EU criteria for the use of vaccination
DEFRA consultation on EU proposal
Feb 12 ~ " I want Ministers to get out
of bed every day and ask, "How can I make life easier? What rule can I scrap
today?" Mr. David Cameron MP (Witney)
Adjournment debate House of Commons 5th Feb: "... By the end of December, all horses, ponies and donkeys will have to have a passport. It is not for travelling or for sale or purchase; it is just for existing. There are no exceptions.
......
Let us clear about where that requirement came from. European Commission decision 93/623 required registered horses born after 1998 to be accompanied by a passport when they are moved. The intention was to simplify the trade in pure-bred horses. Commission decision 2000/68 amended that decision to ensure that horses treated with certain drugs did enter the food chain. Under that decision, all horses will require a passport setting out all medicines taken if the horse is ultimately intended for human consumption.
The Government decided after consultation to implement the directive by introducing a compulsory system of passports for all horses, backed by fines of up to £5,000 or six months' imprisonment. Four questions need to be answered.- Is a passport scheme necessary
- did the Government consult properly
- is their proposal on implementing the decision the right one
- and have they fully understood the drawbacks of their scheme?
[Hon. Members: "No."] My hon. Friends pre-empt me: the answer is no to all four questions.
The Government should have fought the scheme to a standstill in Europe. Pigs and sheep do not have passports. Cows now have passports, but they do not include any information about drugs. At the abattoir, the farmer is simply asked whether any drugs that could enter the food chain have been administered in the past six months. The same procedure could apply to horses, especially in countries such as the UK, where the overwhelming majority of horses never enter the food chain-and a very good thing too. European countries such as France that eat horse flesh import much of it from countries outside the European Union. Will this bureaucratic nonsense be imposed on those countries? Of course not. The EU decision will not even serve the purpose it is intended to serve; it should have been resisted. ..."
"....Nicholas Soames (Mid-Sussex): My hon. Friend is making an extremely powerful case against this dismal
proposal. Does he agree that the Government would have been far better occupied in trying to deal with the appalling conditions in which tens of thousands of horses are shipped to France for food consumption, rather than monkeying around with British horses and ponies, which are already kept to a very high standard?..." Read the debate
Feb 12 ~ There's nothing wrong with technology in itself. It is the way we use it to extract the maximum profit from the land and put the minimum back that is destructive.
Hilary Peters' latest journal entry begins with a visit to Jethro Tull's farm. "....Tull, founding great-grandfather of agro-industry, believed in prosperity as Ben Gill now believes in profitability" writes Hilary. "When living at Prosperous Farm, at the beginning of the eighteenth century, Jethro Tull begrudged his labourers' wages so passionately that he invented the seed drill. It was a brilliant idea, which caught on very slowly. It was another 200 years before agricultural machinery really took off. I wonder if it will take as long for the pendulum to swing the other way.
I don't mean back into the dark ages of drudgery and cruelty. There's nothing wrong with technology in itself. It is the way we use it to extract the maximum profit from the land and put the minimum back that is destructive.
At Prosperous Farm now, they don't do that. It is in the front line of progress once again.
They milk 200 Guernsey cows and sell their gorgeous milk, cream and yoghurt from the farm. You can help yourself and leave your money at any time. All dairywork is done on the farm.
Dairy farming is under immense pressure in this country at the moment. To anyone who cared only about profitability, it would not be seen as a good bet. Yet that is a short-term view. When intensive dairy farming has run itself into the ground, we will still need milk. A beautifully managed herd producing a superb product and selling it locally may well turn out to be the future. Perhaps we are too caught up in the misery of today to see it.....
...The more I see of real farmers producing and selling real food to real customers, the more I think we are at the beginning of a revolution.
Jethro Tull started a pendulum swinging. Most of the revolution that began in his time was healthy and inevitable. 300 years later, the pendulum has reached the unstable top its swing and started to push back ......
"
Feb 12 ~ Homeopathy at Wellie Level
THE RESPONSIBLE USE OF HOMOEOPATHY ON THE FARM.
DESIGNED ESPECIALLY FOR THE FARMER
The only course designed especially for farmers who want to learn about animal homoeopathy, takes place on three separate days spread over 6 weeks to allow time for students to try using remedies on their own animals.
Duchy Home Farm, Tetbury, Abbey Home Farm, Cirencester and the Royal Agricultural College, have all volunteered their farms as study centers. ..
".....An excellent course, everything came together on the third day. It's nice to know that how I've always studied my animals will stand me in good stead for practicing homoeopathy. I must send my husband on the next course.
Thanks for the course. It has got me started and I will continue with it. "
Farmers and stockpersons interested in being on the next course should contact Chris Lees, or Chris Aukland MRCVS., as soon as possible as there will only be 20 places. The cost of the next course is £300 for the three learning days, (10.00 am - 4.30pm), and includes tuition, telephone support, course notes, audio tapes
Dates for next course. 1st May 5th June, 3rd July.
AND, a new initiative in Settle, N.Yorks. 19th March 16th April 15th May
Students will be given a basic understanding of the principles, and clear instruction on how to treat appropriately on the farm, and when to call the vet..... (more)
Feb 12 ~ "I don't have time to be a nursemaid to individuals that don't fit the system" was a common view years ago as pig producers learned to survive competitive pressures by becoming larger...
... and increasingly process-oriented, with widening staff:animals ratios. However, the tide has turned and increasing numbers of pork producers are finding that it is both practically and economically possible to "nurse" sick, lame or bullied individuals, particularly in the grower and finisher stages.....amazing results are being achieved in terms of:
a) valuable compromised individuals that can be saved;
b) reduction of stress and disease and improvement of hygiene in the pens from which they are removed;
c) reduction of whole-pen medication costs.
Secondly, the amount of care needed by compromised individuals is actually very small. All these animals usually need is:
a) a break from vicious cycles of social competition and aggression which accelerate as an individual starts to lose place in the social "pecking order";
b) a supportive environment for "self-healing" (see below);
c) water medication (possibly).
More at: http://www.aasv.org/news/story.php?id=448
Feb 12 ~ "...you can limit the spread of associated diseases and start to look for a cure"
An interesting story from Meat and Poultry online entitled New device can detect mad cow disease (external link)
"An Australian company said it has developed technology to remove the protein that causes mad cow and other neuro-degenerative diseases from blood samples.
The company, Gradipore, said its Gradiflow membrane technology can remove infectious prion proteins from two blood components -- gamma globulin and albumin.
Scientists said the device could permit earlier diagnoses of animals afflicted with these diseases and enable farmers to isolate and remove infected animals from their herds. In addition, they said, it might be possible to use the membrane to detect the human forms of mad cow -- known as Creutzfeldt-Jacob disease.
"This discovery is really important because if you pick up infectious prions at the earliest possible stage, while the animal is still alive, then you can limit the spread of associated diseases and start to look for a cure,"
..
......The technology means that if you have a herd, you can take blood samples from each of your animals and verify if any have diseased prions," Mahler said. "You don't have to kill them all just in case there is potential for infection. It takes the fear factor out of the decision-making process."
Feb 12 ~".. local reporters have been finding out as much as they can for me from DEFRA , and otherwise I would have been kept quite in the dark."
A letter from Janet Hughes, who still has no idea what is going to happen to her.
"DEFRA have made their statements to the press and I therefore hope that they will not rescind on their statement that they have over-charged me - and also that the bailiffs will not act until a decision has been made." Janet's letter
Feb 10 ~ Under the yolk
Telegraph Letters today
Re: Under the yolk Date: 10 February 2003Sir - As a keeper of 32 free-range hens and four bantam pullets, currently yielding an average of three eggs per day (but increasing as the climate improves towards spring), I will need to employ management consultants to ensure that I do not fall foul of the impending European Commission directive requiring each individual free-range egg to be inkjet printed by next year (leader, Feb 8).Bearing in mind that eggshells are porous, is there a guarantee that the information imparted from the 35,000 laser printer will not contaminate the contents of the shell?As I am not emotionally attached to my chickens (although they are sweet), I am unable, under present conditions, to ascertain the name of the chicken laying any particular egg and to print her name on the shell.In the case of bantam eggs, I will need two eggs to have room for all the printed details relating to one.
From:Dan Corbett, Thirsk, N Yorks
Re: Hen directions
Date: 10 February 2003 Sir - The European Commission's directive poses a number of problems for the management of my own small flock of hens.The capital cost of the required inkjet printer is prohibitive. My hens are bought in, not home reared. To enable me to identify from which batch an egg is laid I shall have to install clear signposts to instruct each hen to lay her egg under a specific bush, not randomly as at present.
From:Gerald Poole, Aberporth, Dyfed
Feb 10 ~ "more than eight out of 10 farmers are connected to the internet"
Robert Uhlig's article today:"Online farmers are reaping the rewards (external link)
Farmers are turning to the internet in increasing numbers to challenge the domination of the supermarkets. More than £300 million worth of farm produce was sold online last year.
Farm trade on the internet was unheard of five years ago, but last year one in 10 of Britain's 300,000 farms marketed produce on the internet, generating sales of £325 million, according to a study by the National Farmers' Union. The study scotched the image of farmers as often isolated and out of touch, relying on visits to local markets to catch up on news.
Nowadays, more than eight out of 10 farmers are connected to the internet, using it primarily for information, research, banking and news.
The average value of internet sales per farm has topped £13,000, and more than nine out of 10 farmers expected their sales on the internet would increase this year.
The most popular farm products sold over the internet last year were holiday cottages and bed and breakfast accommodation. However, many farmers sold more traditional agricultural produce, such as plants, Christmas trees and other nursery stock, pig meat, asparagus, hay and straw, feeding equipment and farm toys.
One in six farmers uses the internet to buy in supplies such as animal feed, fertiliser and pesticides...."
Feb 9 ~ Standstill and Tagging Rules. The Voice of Independence -
Jeff Swift in the Westmorland News. Mr Swift says what the "stakeholders" seem too shy to put into words: " Of course, one
has to say it is a move in the right direction because having no movement of
animals for six days must be easier to contend with than 20 days. But, as you
may guess, the sting as ever is in the small print. This is the law and
farmers will do their utmost to comply with it. My thoughts go further and I
refuse to go so far as to say "this is just what is needed".
In my view it is not.
What is needed is a complete lifting of any closedown for, if you were
to agree that six days is fine, then that lends credence to the policy -
which I believe it does not have...."
"...Now for the double-tagging of sheep. .....It
is felt by many people that officials want to see sheep numbers in Britain
drastically cut in order to reduce money paid out in subsidies. Although
(again I understand it is said by some) killing more than eight million
healthy sheep during the foot-and-mouth crisis may have been looked on as a
good start, sheep that were left just kept on breeding. So is this new
requirement the next step? Could thousands more sheep farmers be forced out
of business? ......Why, oh why,
can officials and bureaucrats not understand that it is traceability of
animals and not individual identification that matters. I mean by this "farm
of origin". ......
Thought for the day: Laws, like clothes, should be made to fit the people
they are meant to serve."(Read in full)
Feb 8 ~" I have asked the agriculture minister to explain how new regulations can possibly work when it means massive amounts of extra paperwork."
See Manchester Evening News (external link)
Farmers fury over 'passport plan'
"....MP Andrew Stunell (Hazel Grove) has approached Agriculture Secretary Margaret Beckett on their behalf. Bill Mellor, of Higher Farm, Hazel Grove, said: "They want us to identify every sheep with a passport, to show its date of birth, breed, where it was born, and where it's been during its life.
"It's ridiculous. There are a few small farms in this area and we're all angry. Getting the paperwork completed, is completely impractical.
"It will also cost more money. We are already struggling and they are making matters worse.
"There's nothing wrong with the system in place. A licensing system is now in effect that was not working during the foot and mouth crisis and sheep are easily traceable."
Mr Mellor and other farmers approached Mr Stunell to challenge the government and put a stop to the introduction of red tape that they claim would make buying and selling sheep "almost impossible".
Mr Stunell said: "I have asked the agriculture minister to explain how new regulations can possibly work when it means massive amounts of extra paperwork.
"I'm urging the minister to go for a simplified scheme which lets the farmers get on with their jobs."
Feb 8 ~ Western Mail: "..the Lib/ Lab coalition has filched almost £9m from farmers' incomes through modulation and has not returned a single penny back to the industry.
See report (external link) "NATIONAL Assembly Rural Affairs Minister Mike German has come under fire after it emerged that millions of pounds of so-called modulation money has not been paid out to farmers.
Glyn Davies, Welsh Conservative AM for Mid and West Wales, expressed "shock and outrage" after receiving written answers from Mr German which suggest that not one penny of "modulated" money has yet been allocated.
This is an absolutely scandalous failure, which will destroy any existing support there may be for the principle of modulation.
"Over the last two years there have been hundreds of farmers refused entry into agri-environment schemes because the coalition government has claimed there is no money - while millions of pounds of farmers money has been salted away for no obvious reason."
Feb 8 ~ "The European Commission has certainly "gone to work on an egg"...."
Telegraph ( external link) "Its latest requirement is that farmers must stamp every egg they sell with their home address, the details of the hen which laid the egg, the method of production, the code for the producer-packer, and a sell-by date (News, Feb 7). Lest farmers grumble when the regulations come into effect next year, a Brussels bureaucrat chirped that labelling "will be a nice job for [their] wives".
Despite its concern for marital co-operation, Brussels is, once again, penalising small, independent producers, who must each now waste 35,000 on labelling equipment. These farmers produce the high quality, organic and free range eggs that consumers love, and do already stamp every box with the required information. The effect of this latest diktat will be, in many cases, to drive them out of business - not to mention endangering the age-old tradition of Easter-egg painting, for who can paint an egg covered in graffiti?
All this is to protect us from ever eating a rotten egg. Isn't the real rotten egg here the European Commission?"
Feb 8 ~ " This wonderful piece of beef ....represents an entire culture, the culture of the family farm."
He is the antithesis of DEFRA - The Prince of Wales boldly goes where Mrs Beckett fears to tread, and talks to the French chefs in a language we can be proud of : "... It represents the ancient tapestry of rural life, the dedicated animal husbandry, the struggle with the elements, the love of landscape, the childhood memories, the knowledge and wisdom learnt from parents and grandparents, the intimate understanding of local climate and conditions, the hope and fears of succeeding generations. The same could be said of so much of the produce of France, and particularly, of course, your marvellous wine. Nothing enhances the flavour of beef more than a glass of good French red wine. So eat British beef; drink French wine and preserve a precious, priceless heritage for our future and for our descendants."
See yesterday's Times(external link)
Feb 8 ~ Animal Movements in England and Wales - Spring Regime 2003
Feb 8 ~ DEFRA seeks views on the EU Proposal
CONSULTATION ON PROPOSED EU DIRECTIVE ON COMMUNITY MEASURES FOR THE CONTROL OF FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE
" Section 8 of the (EU ) proposal deals with the issue of emergency vaccination. A decision to introduce emergency vaccination may be made when outbreaks threaten to become widespread, or when other Member States are at risk. Such a decision would normally be made by Standing Committee procedure, either at the request of the Member State directly affected, a Member State at risk, or the Commission itself could also initiate discussion on the use of emergency vaccination. There is also provision for a Member State to introduce emergency vaccination itself and have its decision reviewed and ratified later by the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health.
10. Criteria for the decision to apply protective vaccination and guidelines for emergency vaccination programmes are set out in Annex X to the proposal. Criteria to be considered include: inability to carry out culling within the 24/48 hour targets; if the density of livestock population is high in the area concerned; if pigs are involved; if airborne spread is predicted; where the origin of the outbreak is unknown; if the incidence is rising steeply; and if "regionalisation" after vaccination is acceptable. Your views are sought on whether you think the list of criteria is comprehensive or whether any additional factors should be taken into account." See full consultation letter
Feb 8 ~
The "problem" of the meat seems to lie at the heart of the UK reluctance to take vaccination seriously.
There is no problem in reality. No special labelling needs to be done for vaccinated meat. Not only has the National Consumer Council said so; David Byrne has said so. "...there were suggestions in the course of the last outbreak that such products should be labelled to allow for consumer choice. Animals are already vaccinated against a wide range of diseases, including FMD in the case of imports of maturated meat, without any indication to this effect in labelling. I consider that this policy should remain intact in the event that preventive vaccination is used to deal with future outbreaks." David Byrne, European Commissioner for Health and Consumer Protection
It would be very interesting to know exactly what pressures are being applied to whom, by whom - and why. If "animal health" - or even human health - were really what was at stake, the contingency planning for the next FMD outbreak would look very different. However, this is not the case and so, although vaccination can eventually be found in the words, it is not in the spirit of the present Contingency Plan. It would appear that we are being led and misled by some very big players indeed who have neither animal nor human health in mind. We also wonder what genuine scientific theory, if any, is behind the insistence on heat treatment, deboning and maturing of meat and would very much welcome enlightenment on this point. If it is now possible to test whether a vaccinated animal was infected prior to vaccination or not there is no chance of its meat carrying live virus - why this extra layer of illogical and expensive regulation?
Jan 8 ~ DEFRA seeks views on "required treatments" of vaccinated meat
See consultation letter on proposed EU Directive "11. Detailed conditions applicable in the vaccination zone are set out in Articles 54, 55 and 58 and post vaccination treatments of meat and meat products and milk and milk products are detailed in Annexes VII, VIII and IX. (see pdf file - which loads slowly so it will appear in a new window) Some measures will be required until infection free status is recovered and, in some instances, the meat and meat products will have to carry a special mark. The treatments include heat treatment, deboning and maturing of meat and meat products and pasteurisation of milk from vaccinated animals. Views are sought on the practicality of these proposals.
".....We are particularly interested in your views on the required treatments of meat and milk products produced in the protection and surveillance zones and from vaccinated animals. The proposed treatments include heat treatment, or deboning and maturing of meat and meat products and pasteurisation of milk from vaccinated animals. We are aware that, when emergency vaccination was considered in the UK during the 2001 outbreak, a number of concerns were raised about post-vaccination treatments and we would like to hear from you about this.
5. We will be producing a Regulatory Impact Assessment which will evaluate the costs and benefits emanating from the measures proposed in the Directive. We are keen to receive information which will help to complete the Regulatory Impact Assessment. In particular, we need details about the impact of undertaking the treatments of meat and milk and meat and milk products as detailed in para 4 above.
6. Please send your comments to Jean Kennedy at Area 611, 1a Page Street, London SW1P 4PQ. Her telephone number is 020 7904 6451, or you can fax her on 020 7904 8123. Her e-mail address is jean.m.kennedy@defra.gsi.gov.uk. Please ensure your views reach her by Friday 2 May 2003.
See full consultation letter
Jan 8 ~"..The veterinary art that asks for the herd to be depopulated to control disease epizootics has graduated into politics, which now attempts to sell the idea of preemptive strikes against political infection."
Read this fascinating article from the US: A Three Shepherds Farm Update The idea of a farmer standing up to their betters cannot be tolerated. This article from America has a familiar echoes for us here. What are some of their scientists and bureaucrats up to? What are some of ours up to?
"Detweiler is USDA's first line of defense against anything that makes the headlines anywhere in the world - this line of defense usually being annihilation of the herd to confirm suspicion. ....Detweiler and associates figured that since the East Friesian milking sheep came from Europe, the probability of prion infection - if that phrase can be used - was great. East Friesian sheep are valuable animals, each worth something in the neighborhood of $6,000.
Biased government enforcers hip-deep in snow trundled the animals aboard a train for the long ride to Iowa, the killing room and laboratory examination.
One year later, the results still were not in. Any reputable laboratory can have answers in six hours, a fact that Larry Faillace, the owner of Three Shepherds Farm, pointed out to Acres U.S.A. recently. Tissue samples kept on ice for a long period become worthless as far as honest science is concerned, with a so-called false positive the expected readout.....Had the sheep been cattle rather than political animals, they would have been pronounced clean.
.......The Faillace legal team asked for the actual data. In compliance with the law, it was released, allowing the facts recorded above to finally be assembled.
........The furor over Mad Cow - bovine spongiform encephalopathy or sheep scrapie - has died down, the conventional origin of the mutated prion protein more or less discarded, replaced by the near-certainty that reckless use of Phosmet created the mischief in England and parts of Europe. The veterinary art that asks for the herd to be depopulated to control disease epizootics has graduated into politics, which now attempts to sell the idea of preemptive strikes against political infection. "
Jan 8 ~The European Commission has ordained that, from next year, every egg must be stamped with its home address.
Robert Uhlig in yesterday's Telegraph (external link):
"....Under the EU directive, farmers will have to buy inkjet printers to label every egg with a raft of information, including details of the hen that laid it.
Large operators will be able to absorb the expense of the printing technology, but Peter Wood, who keeps 40,000 hens near Bristol, said the prospect of the cost of the equipment was already driving smaller producers out of business.
"I already know of a handful who have given up because they know they will not be able to afford to implement what is a completely over the top requirement," he said...."
Is it not as apparent to others as it is to ourselves that the EU is poisoning us and is itself the real health risk? The gradual but inexorable centralisation of food production by faceless bureaucrats - whatever the proclained motives of "health and safety" - the imposition of a superstate under cover of innocuous phrases such as "common competences " (see Telegraph) ought to be ringing alarm bells very loudly...or alarm clocks to wake us from our sleep. The creeping abolition of our parliamentary democracy is getting faster - and it is not a dream.
Feb 7 ~ Janet Hughes, still waiting to hear for herself that she has won a last-minute reprieve.
The Shropshire Star report:
".......Miss Hughes, who has waged a battle against the Government's foot and mouth disease livestock culling policy, is faced with the huge bill after losing her case with the Department of Food, the Environment and Rural Affairs to force a judicial review.
Miss Hughes, of Churchstoke, took Defra and the Welsh Assembly to court last year to try to stop their policy of foot and mouth culling on the Brecon Beacons.
Now she has barricaded herself into the home she shares with her partner Glyn and 12-year-old son Matthew and has said she will not leave until the matter has been resolved. "
See Janet Hughes page
Feb 7 ~ Now the word is that one of the sniffer dogs at Heathrow has developed an aversion to conveyor belts and has been allowed to stay in its kennel with a sick note.
The latest Muckspreader from Private Eye.
" No evidence has ever been produced to prove that imported meat did bring the disease into the country....Just before Christmas Rosa's new system was put to the test by one of Britain's ever-growing number of ex-dairy farmers, Peter Weston-Davies, when he arrived at Stansted airport from a holiday in France. Pushing his trolley full of freshly-shot venison, he marched into the EU passport holders' area, to find no customs officer. Anxious to confirm that Britain was now being properly protected against any repeat of the 2001 catastrophe), he therefore headed for the red non-EU passport holders' zone, designated for passengers with 'something to declare'. Again, no customs officer was on duty, but at least there was a telephone for passengers to alert customs staff that they wished their baggage to be inspected.
Down the line, he asked for someone to look over his pack of meat. He was told he would have to wait four and a half hours, the time it would take an inspector to drive to Stansted. So startled was he by this approach that he decided to change his tune. What, he asked, if he confessed that it was not venison he was pushing in his trolley but a consignment of crack cocaine. The customs official laughed and said "Then you'd better just keep pushing, sir".
....."
Feb 7 ~ DEFRA insisted on being the main defendant.
Janet Hughes case. In early August 2001 a letter was sent to Mr Carwyn Jones, the then Minister for Rural Affairs, National Assembly for Wales, informing him that Ms Hughes intended to apply for a judicial review of the decision to cull and continue to cull healthy sheep on a mass scale. This letter was immediately passed on to DEFRA Legal Dept, London, and the Welsh Assembly refused to correspond or be responsible for the decision to cull the sheep, even though Mr Carwyn Jones was holding meetings in Brecon to encourage the graziers to sign the forms of consent.
Because DEFRA were insisting on being the main defendant in the proceedings a letter was sent to them informing them of Ms Hughes' intention to apply for a judicial review by 13 AUGUST. The Department refused to provide details of plans for culling except that more culls were due to take place that weekend and that all the owners had signed the forms of consent.
13 AUGUST 2001 Application for injunction and judicial review made to the courts
16 AUGUST 2001 Judge ordered a hearing as soon as possible
After the judge made the order for a hearing no further mass culls took place on the Brecon Beacons, but by then nearly 20,000 healthy hefted sheep had been needlessly slaughtered, with only 120 or so having anti-bodies. No live virus. See the Summary of the Brecon Beacons case - and Janet Hughes present state of mind about what is happening.
Feb 7 ~ Nicola Morris will take part in next week's Taking a Stand
Wednesday's Radio 4 programme "Strain on the System" gave us the unedifying spectacle of FMD policy apologists, (whose flat tones nevertheless did occasionally betray their unease), trying to airbrush out the errors of 2001. What can have been the effect on the distraught owners of animals killed unnecessarily in botched culls to hear the complacency with which additional funding for DEFRA, in particular the SVS, was discussed. The impression that vaccines were not available/ not good enough was trotted out again. For almost all the men interviewed the answer lay - not in humanity, common sense and responsibility - but merely in better funding for the bureaucrats and the scientists. To hear Sir Brian Follett saying that he would not be critical of the government since to do so would be to depend on "hindsight" was hard to bear for a website of well over 2000 files of contemporary dissent.
So it is at least encouraging to hear that Fergal Keane will be talking to Nicola Morris in Taking a Stand next week. Last July, Mrs Morris, a farmer who successfully defended her own threatened cows, wrote on warmwell: "DEFRA will not reveal how 88% of infected premises in this epidemic became infected - because if they did it would enable us to understand the epidemic.
If we understood the epidemic we could determine
- The true scale of the epidemic
- Whether the adopted culling policy was appropriate
- How many premises were culled illegally and
unnecessarily
And more importantly we would ensure, that the right
lessons are learned for the future..."
Feb 7 ~ successive governments made OP dips compulsory until 1992.
The media interest in the OPUS meeting next Wednesday (see FWi Feb 6 - external link)
raises again the plight of victims of OP poisoning and other questions surrounding the use of these dangerous chemicals. Mark Purdey's theory of organophosphate poisoning elegantly explains all aspects of the BSE epidemic. Limited experimental work done also supports the theory that BSE could have been caused by a combination of organophosphate poisoning and mineral imbalances.
The OP products were not just authorised for use ; sheep farmers and others were effectively forced to use them without safety advice or protective clothing. The pesticide manufacturers maintained that the victims themselves were to blame for clumsy use of OPs. ( Dr Myhill has very kindly offered warmwell a report of the meeting if you are unable to go.)
Feb 7 ~ A reprieve for small abattoirs?
Food and feed controls: The European Association of Craft, Small & Medium-sized Enterprises UEAPME welcomes the Commission's new proposal for food safety issued today. See response
"... UEAPME, who represented the interest of small businesses in the food sector during the pre-communication consultation procedure, is particularly pleased with the proposal for the calculation method of the level of fees applying to SMEs. The Commission provision foresees that the interests of feed and food businesses with a small turnover will be taken into account. This is a true success for SMEs who feared disproportioned costs for food safety checks. Furthermore, UEAPME supports the Commission's decision to take into consideration the level of official controls required, in relation to the quality and intensity of the own checks already carried out by the food businesses themselves. "This proposal goes to prove that necessary controls on food safety can also be carried out properly through regulations that are effective and do not engender excessive burdens for SMEs" Ludger Fischer, UEAPME's food policy specialist added."
Feb 7 ~ Small Abattoirs: EU allows Member States to decide how the costs of official controls will be met
"If Member States impose inspection fees on food and feed business operators, they will have to respect a number of criteria so as to avoid for example excessive fees for small businesses." See Questions and Answers on the proposed Regulation on Official Food and Feed Controls
See also CLA press release: "The UK Government will be given leeway to reprieve smaller abattoirs from
full imposition of meat inspection costs, enabling them to stay in business
as vital contributors to the rural economy. The European Commission's
Proposal for a Regulation on Official Feed and Food Controls, adopted in
Brussels today, leaves Member States to determine how the cost of official
controls is to be met, based on a number of criteria designed to limit the
financial burden on small businesses.
CLA President Sir Edward Greenwell said:
"This is excellent news. Last November the CLA, NFWI and Soil Association
led a campaign supported by 150 organisations representing the full spectrum
of rural interests to oppose the EU's plans for full recovery of meat
inspection costs from all abattoirs. ... We can't afford to lose our smaller local abattoirs and cutting plants.
They currently process 49% of UK livestock and are needed to deal with
specialist and local meats, to provide jobs in rural communities, to support
the survival of valued landscapes and farmland biodiversity, and to minimise
the distances travelled by animals.
"By maintaining charges for meat inspection costs at a proportionate level,
Defra can secure the future of our diverse UK meat processing industry. We
have requested an early meeting with Food and Farming Minister Lord Whitty
to urge him to pass on to the industry the benefit of this welcome EU
concession."
Feb 7 ~ A new discussion forum on Preparing an Animal Health and Welfare Strategy
for Great Britain is now running.
http://www.sustainable-development.gov.uk/forum.htm
" A new discussion forum on Preparing an Animal Health and Welfare Strategy
for Great Britain is now running. The strategy is aimed at managing the
impact of animal diseases and improving the welfare of animals kept by
man,
whilst protecting the economic and social well being of people and the
environment.
The forum gives you the opportunity to say what you think an Animal Health
and Welfare Strategy for Britain should cover. The Forum closes on the 3rd
of April.
If you have forgotten your username or password please e-mail
Paul.Rainey@defra.gsi.gov.uk giving your name and asking for a reminder
of
your password and username. Please allow 24 hours for us to get back to
you."
Feb 5 ~ The tools of modern medicine are there to be used to combat the spread of Mycobacterium bovis and ultimately to eliminate the infection.
We refer those who share our serious concern about bovine TB to the article written by Dr Ruth Watkins, one of Britain's most experienced virologists. "...Badgers, cattle and the reality of a control and elimination programme for bovine TB...
Whilst human medicine tries to put these benefits into practice in Britain it is clear to me that their veterinary colleagues do not. Can we be a civilised society whilst there is this discrepancy? It is not easy to take those steps that put it into practice, even a pilot study, and learn how it can most successfully be applied and then to carry it through. This includes educating and persuading the population, in this instance the farmers and persons with an interest in badger welfare. ......The ultimate goal of the pilot study would be to control and eliminate Mycobacterium bovis from all potentially infectable species: cattle, badgers and humans in the area under study. If this could be achieved then it could be widely applied.
No programme of this nature is possible through individual funding by farmers even supposing they could afford it- the majority of livestock farmers could not. As in medicine good public health policies need public funding and conscientious application by persons with appropriate training in infection. "
Feb 5 ~ Misunderstanding continues about the scale of the FMD epidemic
While we are always grateful to the Farmers Weekly Interactive site for its full and detailed daily reports we are concerned to read, in the article about the disastrous spread of bovine TB (external link above), the following sentences: "More than 4000 herds remain under bovine TB restrictions, revealed government statistics on Tuesday (4 February).
The figure compares with 2030 farms which suffered an outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease during 2001."
2030 farms infected? Where is the data for this often quoted figure? We only know for certain that there were animals on 1324 farms which had foot and mouth disease or had had foot and mouth in the previous weeks. Only by analysing disease transmission will we establish how many, if any, of the more than 9 thousand other premises whose animals were killed - amounting to many millions - were infected or incubating the disease at slaughter. We would draw readers' attention to the detailed article by Nicola Morris on this website last July entitled "Myth and Reality". As Nicola Morris said, "Clinical and Laboratory test results for the 2026 "infected" premises (source JCC data analysis): Of the 2026 premises 171 had no clinical signs of disease, that is they were antibody positive only. Therefore 1855 premises were diagnosed clinically, the laboratory test results for these premises were: 1153 positive, 401 negative and 301 untested.
Therefore, of the 1855 confirmed on clinical grounds 62% tested positive in the laboratory."
The reality is that we do not know the scale of FMD - which is why websites like this continue to call for the epidemiological data to be released into the public domain.. That this still has not been done raises many further questions about the justification of the postcode cull policies and the extraordinary decision not to use emergency vaccination even though all the criteria needed had been met. It is becoming increasingly apparent that farmers and stockholders were led by the nose into complying with a cruel and unnecessary "solution", unaware that, for MAFF/DEFRA at least, the solution sought included a massive reduction in numbers of livestock. Those farmers in Devon who successfully resisted kept their animals. There was not one case of the farms resisting going down with the disease - as the Grunty case itself illustrated. This case also showed quite clearly that the Government had no pre-emptive right to come in and kill animals which could not reasonably be considered to be infected, nor likely to infect others. Why otherwise has it wasted so much time and effort in forcing through the Animal Health Act 2002? Rosemary Upton's animals have, of course, remained perfectly healthy.
Feb 5 ~ We would welcome any reports, brief or long, about the Foot and Mouth programme tonight
Radio 4 21:00 Wednesday 5th Feb "....the Government's Audit
Office estimated the outbreak had cost the country more than eight billion
pounds. During and after the epidemic, questions were raised about the
Government's handling of the crisis: why did it take so long to eradicate the
disease? Was slaughter the only solution?"
Feb 4 ~ OPEN MEETING - Is BSE Caused by Organophosphate Poisoning?
KNIGHTON COMMUNITY CENTRE
7.00pm Wednesday, 12th February 2003
SPEAKER - Mark Purdey
CHAIRMAN - Sir Simon Gourlay
(Ex-President National Farmers Union)
"......The Purdey theory of organophosphate poisoning elegantly explains all aspects of the BSE epidemic and limited experimental work done so far is completely supportive of BSE being caused by a combination of organophosphate poisoning and mineral imbalances.
The Purdey hypothesis is a politically unacceptable explanation of BSE and therefore it has been deliberately suppressed. This is because the implications of such a theory are so far reaching and not just for the chemical industry. If Purdey is right and that prion disorders (like BSE and nvCJD) are caused by chemical poisoning then this may explain the epidemics we are now seeing of other prion disorders such as Alzheimer's disease, motor neurone disease and Parkinson's disease."
OPUS welcomes everyone to attend. Free admission for OPUS members. Admission at the door £2.00. Further information from the Organiser Dr Sarah Myhill 01547 550 611 or Rev'd Nick Read 01588 680 609. Knighton Community Centre is in the centre of Knighton at the rear of Harry Tuffins Supermarket and Petrol Station. Follow the signs for Long Stay Parking/Lorry Park. See also OPUS website
Feb 4 ~ "The Government is completely satisfied that meat and meat products from vaccinated animals
can enter the food chain.
The Food Standards Agency advise that the health implications from eating
meat, milk or other produce from animals that have been treated with authorised FMD vaccines are
negligible." This is paragraph 4.3.16 (page 41) from the Government's own Response to the Reports
of the Foot and Mouth Disease
Inquiries
The fact that this unambiguous statement has not been made loudly and clearly to the population seems to us to be significant. Are the powerful factions which simply do not want to produce vaccinated meat because if they did they would lose vast profits still leading UK policy by the nose? The actual FMD vaccine in an animal is similar to the injected material of an insect bite - which disperses naturally and leaves no trace. If (as we doubt) the public really has a mental picture some kind of active residue of "chemicals" it is time the FSA of all people, put paid to this nonsense.
The same document gives as the key factors "before the
Government could pursue an emergency vaccinate-to-live policy" - "the acceptability and hence the saleability of products from vaccinated animals"
- the "need for validation of tests to
distinguish vaccinated from infected animals"
- that "Emergency vaccination can only take place as the subject of EU decision. In order for a
vaccination strategy to be fully effective there would need to be a concerted EU approach and a new
legislative framework at EU level."
Since the EU Directive is clear on this point there remains only the "validation" of tests. DEFRA seems to believe that reams of pious words about itself as a department, information about new funding, new personnel and coils of regulations will cover up the fact that its commitment to emergency vaccination appears almost non-existent. DEFRA does not seem to want to be bothered with the implementation of a vaccinate to live policy now any more than it did two years ago.
If the UK government is serious about wanting to avoid the misery and wasted millions of FMD 2001 the bureaucrats need to be told and the political will necessary to solve the apparent difficulties of emergency vaccination urgently sought.
Feb 4 ~"Commissioner Byrne shows a lack of under-standing of how the sheep industry operates ..."
David Byrne has refused to reconsider his proposed change in the European rules for identifying and tracing sheep and goats. See Western Mail (external link)
Feb 4 ~ Six-day standstill could severely hamper the viability of markets.
In their zeal for improved "bio-security" the government's new ideas on how livestock markets should operate - including the banning of overnight stays, the cleaning of all vehicles before they leave and the possible imposition of a limit of 90 miles on the movement on animals - have stunned market leaders, who in spite of DEFRA's constant references to so-called "stakeholders", were not consulted before the announcement was made.
See : FWi 03 February 2003
by James Garner
".. .. Food and Farming minister Lord Whitty said the additional costs that markets would have to bear would be taken into account.
But he added: "We feel these measures may be needed for a permanent regime and the industry will have to adapt."
......
David Brown, secretary of the Livestock Auctioneers' Association, said there were four major areas of concern.
"Many markets are at least 90 miles away from their nearest abattoir - imposing this limit would be more devastating than anything we have had before."
He added a rule banning stock from staying overnight was "ridiculous".
"Almost all abattoirs want stock in first thing in the morning, which is impossible if overnight stays aren't allowed."
Small marts would not be able to cope with cleaning and disinfection rules, and the requirement for a vet to be in attendance would be expensive, said Mr Brown.
"In actual fact, we would be far better off with the 20-day rule because we could live under those conditions."
Feb 3/4 ~ Lord
Carter was given the Channel 4 'Peer of the Year' award on Saturday
Continuing the apparent practice of giving awards to those showing the least interest in animal welfare in their pursuit of power and fortune ( Roy Anderson, Neil
Ferguson, Dick Sibley and David King) we now discover that Lord Carter was given the Channel 4 "Peer of the Year"(external link) award. Here are some extracts from the warmwell website about the noble lord - for readers who may not be aware of the extraordinary events of last March.
Feb 3 ~ Theodore Dalrymple's words yesterday could equally apply to FMD "experts"
How many of these quotations are relevant to the "expert" opinion driving the mass culling in the FMD epidemic? See Dr Dalrymple's article in yesterday's Sunday Telegraph
"When medical experts open their mouths the truth is supposed to emerge, especially in court." However, "they sometimes have feet of clay."
When referring to the three medical experts who gave evidence in the Sally Clark case, Dr Dalrymple says"one of these experts was changeable in his opinion, another concealed or forgot to mention facts that did not support his conclusions, and a third relied upon erroneous statistical reasoning."
"Once the expert has taken a position, he feels compelled by a sense of pride to defend it, irrespective of its flaws and shortcomings. He thus resorts to sophistry to back up his position: like the lawyer, he becomes more interested in good argument that serves his purpose than in the truth.
"I have seen experts of world fame defend the indefensible in the witness box, merely because their 'amour propre' will not allow them to acknowledge the validity of a point against their own opinion. If the cross-examining lawyer is any good, such experts end up looking like fools; but if he is no good (and barrister, too, may have feet of clay), their flawed opinions go by default." (read article)
We can't help remembering James Dring's irritation at the Waugh trial
Feb 3 ~ The origins of foot and mouth - Bob Parry
icwales network
"Mr Parry said last year's foot-and-mouth epidemic almost certainly originated from abroad. "The bacteria (sic) must have arrived in this country via substandard, illegal meat imports," he said. "The FUW believes that unless Government takes decisive action to halt this trade, there is nothing to prevent another disaster such as last year's foot and mouth epidemic from reoccurring - and that cost the country more than £8bn to clear up....."
This sort of extract shows how important it is to get into the public domain as soon as possible, both the epidemiological data and authoritative information about the disease and the modern, civilised approach to its eradication (See Royal Society Report, the EU Final Report and Dr Watkins advice given at Strasbourg). Ignorance about the nature of the virus, the efficacy of vaccination, the safety of eating products from vaccinated stock and the tragic waste caused by the widescale slaughter based on models not based on sound veterinary science - is still widespread, even (and especially) among those whose voices are the loudest.
Feb 3 ~" the public has empathy for farmers' troubles.. little understanding of the issues they face"
Robert Uhlig in today's Telegraph on the £250,000 for a campaign to improve the image of UK farming
".... Research has found that, although the public has empathy for farmers' troubles, they have little understanding of the issues they face, such as the heavy bureaucratic burden and the relative decline of their euro-linked subsidy payments.
Among the issues farmers want to publicise is how small a proportion of retail prices they receive for their produce and that most farmers earn much less than the national minimum wage.
A similar project, called the Campaign Against Rural Exodus and launched in Northern Ireland last year, was successful.
The campaign is believed to have been partly prompted by the launch of Farm, a new farmers' union financed by Zac Goldsmith, a millionaire environmentalist."
Feb 3 ~ Concern for Janet Hughes continues
We hear from one emailer:"My mother, who has really not got terribly "involved" in FMD, greeted me with the (Christopher Booker) article as soon as I arrived this morning. She actually said that Defra were absolute b......... Now for my mother to use such a term is virtually unheard of!! She was obviously upset about the veterinary point of view (healthy animals being slaughtered), but what really hit home was Janet's plight and the fact they were taking the youngster's belongings. She found that staggering.
This will have done DEFRA not the slightest bit of good.... "
Janet Hughes herself writes: "This situation is terrible for Matthew. He's been so supportive of me, and has come to all the court hearings in London and Cardiff, but now it is all too much for him.
It is just not right for Matthew to be going through this. It feels like persecution. I managed to find out from the bailiff's office that DEFRA applied to the High Court for a warrant of seizure of possessions on 5 November 2002, just a few day after my application re: the TSE regulations/ AHBill. It does seem very much as if they are trying to punish me for attempting to seek justice.
DEFRA forced their way into the case in August 2001 because the Welsh Assembly would not admit any responsibility. However, I have proof that the Assembly were making decisions regards the culling. So in fact DEFRA chose to be the main defendant and therefore why should they demand these vast costs?"
Feb 3 ~ "those honest, brave, resilient, broken people.."
2 years after the Foot and Mouth epidemic started, a selection of works from the Exhibition, 'The Shadow of Foot and Mouth' is coming to the Forest of Dean, 15th - 23rd February 2003
10am to 4pm - ADMISSION FREE - Information 01453 764376
The Exhibition, organised by Julia Currie, a Gloucestershire Farmer, was shown in Stroud last year. It included photographs, poems and other works of art, and was widely acclaimed. Its visit to the Forest is by invitation of the Forest Action Group, which during the epidemic successfully campaigned for blood tests for the remaining livestock in the Forest, and supported owners at the farm gate. The February event includes photos of Gloucestershire Farmers, cartoons, videos, books, personal stories and a selection of other works.
As one of the many people who visited the Stroud event wrote 'The Exhibition was shatteringly good. I stood humble and chastened in front of those honest, brave, resilient, broken people and fought the tears'
Feb 3 ~ "what is all this market-led claptrap when you get down to it?"
Hilary Peters writes," Theological is a striking word to apply to an argument about farming. It was used to describe one approach to organic farming (and I suppose to take an oblique pot shot at the Prince of Wales) by Martin Haworth, Policy Director of the NFU. He is talking of people who think that organic farming is "intrinsically better for the environment, for the consumer, for the farmer", ie me, among others.
He thinks "there is a market for this type of production (organic food) and it makes sense to fill it, but it must be market led." With breath-taking hypocrisy, he adds piously:
"You can't dictate what people produce."
The NFU seem to me to do little else.
And what is all this market-led claptrap when you get down to it? People buy what they are told to buy by advertisers, choosing from what is available.
Which brings me neatly back to education.
I am looking for a way of getting the free-range/organic message across to the general public. It doesn't have to be a theological way, though obviously it is a much wider message than one that simply appeals to people's greed.
....
"God" is shorthand for "important things that don't go into words." Religions are languages, particularly misunderstood because they are dealing with non-verbal realities. So I think Martin Haworth is right and organic farming is more than a method of efficient food production. It's up to us to define what more." Read the ediary update for Hilary's full message.
Feb 2 ~ "Defra fights dirty with anti-cull campaigner"
is the first item in this week's Sunday Telegraph Booker's Notebook Extract:"During the 2001 foot and mouth epidemic, Janet Hughes, an environmental sciences teacher, spent her life savings in a bid to have the cull of 10,000 healthy sheep on the Brecon Beacons declared illegal. When her case was dismissed last year, Defra announced it would pursue her for its costs.
.....She argued that the Assembly had no power to carry out a "contiguous cull", since the 1981 Animal Health Act only authorised the killing of animals that had been infected or directly exposed to infection.
Having exhausted her funds, she continued on her own until, in January 2002, Lord Justice Latham dismissed her case in the Appeal Court by ruling that, if a minister believed there was a reason for the contiguous cull policy, the courts must accept his opinion.
......
It was Defra's legal department that insisted, following Latham's ruling, that Miss Hughes must pay the ministry's £17,000 costs, even though it was not against Defra she had brought her case.
After months of silence, Miss Hughes was last week astonished to have a visit from the bailiffs, combing her house for goods they intended to seize..." read in full.
The law was clear to anyone with any sense. The flocks in the Brecon Beacons were healthy and the 1981 law did not permit slaughter for political reasons only. The Animal Health Bill had to be rushed through Parliament at such speed to change this. The EU FMD final Report states " The mode of transmission of the virus did not play any part in the models, according to statements by the head of the British Government's scientific advisory group. The appropriateness of the unvalidated models used to plot the course of the epidemic remains scientifically controversial and in particular is challenged by veterinary scientists with FMD expertise. The models used ultimately resulted in the proposal at the end of March 2001 for the novel 24/48 hours contiguous culls (i.e. slaughtering susceptible animals at infected farms within 24 hours of the infection's being diagnosed and slaughtering susceptible animals at neighbouring farms within 48 hours) - a strategy which was fraught with inevitable lax biosecurity and documented infringements of animal welfare law....The 3 km cull...may not have had a basis in domestic law, irrespective of the question of the practicability and proportionality of this measure.
Janet is being hounded for money she gave voluntarily in her bid to get common sense from the English Courts. That she failed and that DEFRA's legal department now sees fit to demand £17 000 from her is likely to seize the imagination of the fair-minded - especially now that the Media are interested. ( We note this article in the Independent yesterday (external link): "New citizens will be told to respect the equality of women and people of different cultures, and to adopt British "values of toleration, fair play, freedom of speech and of the press". They will be told about the legal system and the democratic process."
Old citizens might like to write to Defra - See yesterday's item)
Feb 2 ~ the arguments used to persuade the farmers to part with their flocks in the Brecon Beacons were based on the assertion that these flocks must have been heavily infected. Nothing could have been further from the truth.
Those who may not be aware of why Janet Hughes was so driven to act in the Brecon Beacons should be aware - as we were at the time - of how little infection there was. The whole of the Brecon Beacons were only ever found to antibody positive - there were no clinical signs of disease at all. See information from Parliamentary Question 2164 (slow to load) - alternatively, see summary Extract:
".....in Powys:
- a total of 392 premises were slaughtered out but only 44 were actually shown to have FMD. NB they only tested 90 of the 392 premises.
- of all the tests on SOS and DC premises (12 out of 14 SOS premises and the 11 out of 304 DC premises) not a single positive result was obtained. The controversial mass slaughter policy of the Beacons was "justified" by classifiying the premises as DCs. There were 304 of these DCs, and yet none of the sample tested yielded positive results. (This figure includes the contiguous premises).
It is patently obvious that if there had been any infection being harboured in the flocks, it would have shown up in the sample tested. Many of the arguments used to persuade the farmers to part with their flocks were based on the assertion (which was itself decreed by the epidemiological models) that these flocks must have been heavily infected, and needed clearing out. Nothing could have been further from the truth...." More
Feb 2 ~ "Any Contingency Plan should be presented as simply as possible..."
"... Though much detail has been incorporated, it is presented in an illogical manner.
The Plan should be laid out in a chronological fashion "
Bryn Wayt has sent a long, detailed and critical response to DEFRA in connection with the new DEFRA Contingency Plan.
Extract: "The DEFRA Contingency Plan - Version 2.5 gives the impression that much has been learned, but little if anything has changed in tactics from the 2001 FMD outbreak, ...Section upon Section on communications between all parties (but) lacks grass-root operational vitality and a basic 'what do we need to do at the farm'.
It has failed to incorporate or even acknowledge in a forthright manner the VITAL role of VACCINATION as a tool of first resort as was identified and recorded in the Inquiry Report by the EU Temporary Committee on FMD (Dec 2002)
...The FSA were very guarded about letting the UK public know the truth that vaccinated meat (and products) is safe to consume.
...
I emailed the FSA asking that they educate the public on the vaccination agenda by issuing the FACTS now - they refused, but said in the event of another FMD outbreak they would make a public announcement that vaccinated meat (and products) are safe ... this is an utter disgrace that should be corrected.
So that it is on record, I reproduce here what should be in the Public Domain via the FSA.
From FSA : (dated 3 Dec 2002 at 13.25 hrs)
....
You asked about the FSA position on eating meat that has been vaccinated against Foot and Mouth Disease.
The FSA advice is that the health implications from eating meat, milk or other produce from animals that have been treated with authorised Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) vaccines are negligible.
Direct exposure to the active (live) foot and mouth virus has only rarely been reported to result in human infection. FMD vaccines contain inactivated (dead) foot and mouth virus and, in addition, must comply with regulatory requirements (Directives 1999/104/EC and 2001/82/EC) on safety for use in food animals.
In the event of another Foot and Mouth outbreak and the decision to use authorised vaccine being made, the FSA would make the view in the paragraph above public by means of its website and in responses to questions from stakeholders and consumers - and we will also explain this position to those who enquire in the absence of any outbreak.
The lesson to be taught here in the Contingency Plan is that vaccinate meat is safe." See Captain Wayt's response in full
Feb 1 ~ Janet Hughes and the demand from DEFRA for £17,000 in costs
It has been suggested that there are those at DEFRA who do have a heart - certainly many there do have a certain amount of sympathy with the opposition to the "postcode" contiguous culling of 2001. A tactful email or letter to DEFRA from those who feel that Janet Hughes' legal stand was the altruistic act of a courageous woman might do some good. Politely to request that she should now be left in peace rather than harried for money that she quite evidently hasn't got might reach the desk of someone who can intervene. Example letter.
FMD Science and General Policy Team
Animal Movements and Exotic Diseases Division
Defra
Area 610, 1A Page Street, London, SW1P 4PQ
GTN 3290 6984
Tel 020 7904 6984 Fax 020 7904 8123
Email address: martyn.dilley@defra.gsi.gov.uk
Feb 1 ~ More on the parallels between government responses to FMD and Exotic Newcastle Disease
An email from California: "I am sorry I have not gotten back to you sooner but we are in the middle of
a holocaust.
Animals have always been a main part of my life. I have showed horses for a
living for close to 40 years... We have a flock of 17 chickens, 22 ducks, and 2
geese, most of which we rescued from terrible cicumstances.... The Exotic
Newcastle disease is threatening our family. They are depopulating healthy
birds. They do this like Nazi Sturmtroopers by putting the frightened birds
in plastic bags and pumping in carbon monoxide.
I have contacted a lawyer to
get an injunction against killing my pets if it comes to that. Our birds are
isolated and we have locked the yard from everyone. We wear different shoes
while in the backyard.
The sad thing here is not the government but how the
government has to respond to this crisis because of ignorant people....
There is a town meeting tonight with the California Department of Food and
Agriculture. I hope to bring up several points to them.... It seems like insanity to us. If this was parvo
they would not kill all the dogs. People would not stand for it."
See also item about vaccination for END".. There is an emerging rift between knowledgeable egg-industry veterinarians who favor quarantine, limited depletion, and intensified vaccination, and regulatory veterinarians, who are pursuing a "traditional" program of detection and slaughter. "
Feb 1 ~ the future for family farms, with an opportunity to question experts
From the Westmorland Gazette (By Gazette News Desk ) Talking futures
A Farmer with the ear of Government is to head a list of prestigious speakers at the first Rural Futures conference at Newton Rigg College, near Penrith on February 6. The event will focus on the future for family farms, with an opportunity to question experts, including Sir Donald Curry, the overseer of the Government Strategy for Agriculture. Anyone interested should contact Voluntary Action Cumbria on 01768-242130.
Feb 1 ~ trying to access Government-administered
help and funding "complex, baffling and bureaucratic"
Rural campaigners lobbied Lord Haskins on Thursday to get a
better deal. From the this is leicestershire site
".....
Campaigners told Lord Haskins how rural businesses and jobs were suffering
because Defra was not able to deliver the right services. They said they
were being told to diversify their businesses to make money but Government
red tape was stopping them from doing so.
CLA regional director Bruce Wilson-North ...said: "We voiced the frustration of rural businesses and communities over
their experiences of dealing with Government. Rural businesses and farmers
seeking to diversify too often find trying to access Government-administered
help and funding complex, baffling and bureaucratic."
Jan 31 ~ "Defra claim they have no option but to take Miss Hughes' possessions to recover taxpayers money,
after she failed to pay their court costs...." What do they mean - no option - and where is mention ever made of taxpayers' money - millions of pounds of it - wasted on the lunatic culling policy against which Ms Hughes so gallantly fought ?
Read the report in today's Shropshire Star
Donations to help can be made payable to "Save Our Sheep Appeal", Laurel's
Cottage, Churchstoke, Montgomery, Powys, SY15 6SR, Telephone/Fax: 01588 620
591. Or paid into any branch of the Nationwide Building Society Trust
Acc no: 0863/703 560 350, Sort Code 07-00-93, 33333334
Alistair McConnachie writes:
"....Dafydd Morris, from the Council of the Welsh Highland Shepherds believes
that had it not been for her, then DEFRA would have continued to slaughter
throughout the Brecon Beacons and into North Wales.
On the 30 January 2002, Janet Hughes appealed in Cardiff against being
denied a Judicial Review, but was unsuccessful there also.
Janet Hughes has demonstrated an astonishing degree of selflessness and
social conscience.
Farmers throughout Wales have a lot to thank this woman for, and it is a
national scandal that her efforts are so little known or appreciated,
especially by those who ought to be thanking her."
Jan 31 ~ Livestock
hand-reared on farms can now no longer be
killed humanely on site.
Today's Western Morning News report:
"Thousands of farm animals are being put under "considerable stress" as
guidance from Britain's food watchdog forces an end to a widespread
rural tradition and drives mobile slaughtermen out of business.
Farming leaders have condemned the confusing advice from the Food
Standards Agency which is being interpreted to mean that livestock
hand-reared on farms across Devon and Cornwall can now no longer be
killed humanely on site....The Westcountry has around 30 mobile slaughtermen. A few months ago,
Keith Long was one of them - but he has now joined the growing list of
those giving up their trade for fear of prosecution.
He had 1,300 customers reliant upon his services. Today, at 45, he is
out of work, by official diktat: it is claimed that home slaughtering
constitutes a health risk.
"All those years of hard work," he says, "all that accumulated
experience, all the income which I had reason to expect from a carefully
built-up client-base. All gone, at the stroke of an official pen in an
office hundreds of miles away. It is heartbreaking."
Yes it is heartbreaking. The FSA seems behind so much illogical bureaucracy which has far-reaching and harmful effects. To many, it seems that the Food Scare Agency themselves remain arrogant and impervious in their London ivory tower. The Food Safety Act of 1990 was designed to stop illegal slaughter of animals in filthy conditions - but as so often, a piece of legislation with laudable motives has been twisted to cause the maximum confusion and distress to the very people whose activities with animals are the most safe and humane. Oh for just a modicum of Common Sense in matters pertaining to animals and Animal Health.
Jan 31 ~ (the real problem).. . the illegal slaughterhouses, the corruption within the Meat Hygiene Service and the lack of accountability with the FSA.
warmwell has been sent another scathing critique of the "Unfit Meat" programme from the BBC, this time from Val Sinclair. Extracts: "The programme was more 'theatre' than I could ever have imagined.....
....TESCO did not make any comment to the Two Sisters cutting plant shots. They would have been given a right to reply, but for some reason saw fit not to. That tells me that TESCO did not take this footage seriously.... .
....this is Trial by Media in the truest sense of the word. The EHO/Trading Standards would not have allowed those scenes to take place. I would suggest that the raid took place first, followed by the BBC then arriving and filming the interview...
...(the real problem).. is the illegal slaughterhouses, the corruption within the MHS and the lack of accountability with the FSA.
If this is the best the BBC can do - on what is a very serious problem - I suggest we all join Jonathan Milller and do not renew our licences." (Read in full)
Jan 31 ~ "the deficiencies of a draconian program of
detection and eradication"
Parallels between exotic Newcastle (poultry) Disease and FMD in vaccination/slaughter mind-set approaches can be seen in this extract from ProMed on 28 Jan: " Speaking to an audience of industry veterinarians and production managers,
Dr. Richard Breitmeyer of the California Department of Food and Agriculture
warned that the current crisis surrounding an outbreak of exotic Newcastle
disease (END) could get even more complicated.....There is an emerging rift between knowledgeable egg-industry veterinarians
who favor quarantine, limited depletion, and intensified vaccination, and
regulatory veterinarians, who are pursuing a "traditional" program of
detection and slaughter.
The situation demands a reappraisal of the effectiveness of vaccination....Recent experiences during 2000 in
controlling avian influenza in Italy and foot-and-mouth disease in Great
Britain have demonstrated the deficiencies of a draconian program of
detection and eradication. In fact, Britain and other European Union
countries will apply vaccination as the principal control measure in future
outbreaks of these catastrophic animal diseases...."
Jan 30 ~ Plan to elect future NFU presidents by a one member, one vote ballot thrown out last week by the union's ruling council.
See this is Bristol website (external link)
".......Mr Mead, an NFU delegate to the national council himself, said the latest efforts to reform the union showed why the changes were needed.
He said: "The more the nodding donkeys at the top block every attempt to modernise the union, the more remote it is becoming from its members."
The resolution calling for a change in the voting system was tabled by members of the Leeds and Wakefield branch.
It had been due to be discussed at next month's annual meeting but was vetoed.
Farmers wanted to see reform because they say the present system, a secret ballot by members, smacks of 'cronyism'....."
Jan 30 ~ DEFRA "stakeholders" meeting today will consider FMD control strategies.....
We are hoping that decisions made today will be important. We hope too that any conclusions will be made available to others with a stake in the outcome who were not invited and whose strong and informed opinions tend to remain unheard.
Jan 30 ~ DEFRA is accused of "mindless incompetence"
Brussels say pigs should have access to
straw, hay, wood, sawdust or peat. This is sensible. British Government officials on the other hand
say that balls or other toys
should be included in the "environment enrichment" scheme.
See WMN report and despair."Official instructions to farmers are to give pigs "environmental
enrichment" by providing "manipulable material" which the Department of
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs says could be defined as balls,
though there is no specific mention of toys in the EU directive.
"
Joyce D'Silva, Chief Executive of CIWF, does not think this is very funny. She said "With this announcement, DEFRA are completely trivialising animal welfare issues. The EU Directive on providing pigs with "manipulable material" is a welfare measure designed to ensure they can carry out their natural rooting behaviour - instead of living on barren, concrete slatted floors. The intention is to provide pigs with materials like straw or mushroom compost to allow them to root - not basketballs as quoted by DEFRA". See Foodfen.org CIWF is consulting its legal team today regarding further action
Jan 30 ~ Breaches
of animal welfare regulations not considered important by the BBC either?
We have received more comment on the BBC so-called exposé
of Dirty Meat
"I recorded this and watched it last night; it was very poorly put together
and I'm not at all sure what the programme makers were attempting to
achieve. My immediate thoughts were much more directed at apparent breaches
of the welfare at slaughter regulations, although this aspect was not
discussed in the 'investigative' reporter's disjointed dialogue (Marks out
of 10 probably 0). The programme was so poor that I recorded the
superlative Life of Mammals on top of it the same evening (Marks out of 10
certainly 10). That says it all really."
Jan 30 ~ Mark Purdey will be addressing a meeting on the borders near Hereford for OPUS on February 12th.
Ex NFU president Simon Gourlay is chairing the meeting, so the meeting should attract some of the non converted as well as the converted and provide some lively debate.
Organophosphate Poisoning (external link) By Dr Sarah Myhill Updated September 2001 Knighton community centre is the venue and Knighton is located about 16 miles
west of Ludlow on the A4113 road in the Welsh border country.
Jan 30 ~ Janet Hughes
The item on Janet Hughes yesterday remains very important. As we said, her family has suffered a great deal in standing up for all who have been threatened by the knee-jerk legislation. To demand £17000 in costs is surely a cowardly act on the part of DEFRA.
Please make cheques/postal orders payable to:-
'Save the Sheep Appeal Fund'
Send them to:-
Laurels Cottage.
Churchstoke.
Montgomery.
Nr.Powys.
SY15 6SR
Jan 29 ~ "We know what a landscape stripped of livestock looks like, because we saw it in North Devon in the wake of foot and mouth disease
and it made a strange and slightly eerie sight. Is that the shape of things to come? Because it isn't going to do much for rural tourism if it is. " Antony Gibson has written entertainingly but with great seriousness in today's Western Morning News about the implications of the Fischler proposals: ".... If Fischler were to get his way, the new system could be in place in less than 12 months' time. And if that were to happen, then beef calves being sold now will never qualify for the beef special premium, the slaughter premium will have less than a year to run, and anyone buying eligible arable land now will only be abe to claim area payments on it for this season.
So while there is absolutely no certainty, the possibility of the single income payment being in place for January 2004 needs to be factored into every farmer's forward planning.
As for the rest of it - the finer points of modulation, degressivity, the dairy proposals, the farm advisory system and the farm assurance and animal welfare grants - there is much to be done around the negotiating table in taking out unfairness, particularly so far as our larger farmers are concerned.
On balance, the proposals are probably more of an opportunity than a threat, but only if we respond positively and imaginatively to the new situation when it arises. If single income payments really do materialise, they must become a supplement to an efficient, productive and, in every sense, sustainable farming industry in the South West, not a substitute for it.
Jan 29 ~ "Sheep movements must be reduced and minimised, perhaps by locating abattoirs and auctions closer to each other and the source of production...."
is one of the conclusions of a new report from Newcastle university. See press release: "Foot and mouth report recommends major changes to the lamb supply chain" (external link)
"Future foot and mouth disease epidemics in the UK could spread as quickly and easily as the 2001 outbreak unless changes are made to the fat lamb supply-chain, according to new research published , almost two years after the first case was confirmed.
The report, published by the University of Newcastle's Centre for Rural Economy (CRE) and The Institute of Logistics and Transport, says that the foot and mouth disease (FMD) outbreak in 2001 exposed the 'poor logistics mechanisms and practices' throughout the supply-chain. It says the chain is characterised by a large number of animal movements, many of which go unrecorded. ...."
More regulations advocated by the academics. More than half of Britain's slaughterhouses have closed over the last five years,
because of unfair charges. Can the UK government implement EU legislation to enable smaller abattoirs to remain in business?
Hill farmers and others are not going to be impressed by the report's other recommendations. Sheep movements don't go unrecorded. (If they have in the past it is because the restrictions were seen to be too draconian. The answer is not to make them even more so). We already have the most stringent regulations regarding the movement of sheep.
All animals that go into the food chain have to be recorded at market and the abattoir.
The 20-day movement restrictions has been reduced to six days. Every lamb has a tag in its ear and from February 1st even more identification will be demanded.
Jan 29 ~ Janet Hughes is charged £17,000 for daring to question the postcode killing of the FMD policy and the new draconian provisions of the Animal Health Bill
To our disgust, we hear that DEFRA have demanded expenses of £17,000 from Ms Hughes. Bailiffs apparently went to her home yesterday and listed her personal belongings, including her car. These are to be impounded in five days if the money is not paid. Ms Hughes' son is 12 years old . He has supported his mother throughout. As a result of the bailiffs' visit he has become frightened and is described as "inconsolable". The family does not deserve to lose any more - they have given so much in a fight they thought was a just one and from which they could hope to gain nothing.
Read about Ms Hughes at http://www.blaikiewell.com/saveoursheep and consider sending some financial support (even a small amount would help.) We are well aware that many (who may not even be aware of their motives for thinking so ) have considered her actions ill-advised - nevertheless Ms Hughes has been fighting for all those who were and will be adversely affected by knee-jerk legislation. Such legislation - deplored even by Lord Haskins and many others - is based on science yet to be proved sound. It is a disgrace that such a well meaning and altruistic stand should be punished with such swingeing costs - presumably both to "punish" her presumption and discourage others. Please do help if you can. Visiting the site above allows for an easy donation to be made. We understand that questions are now to be asked in Parliament about this case and should be very grateful to hear more. The contiguous cull was a disaster. When, as they will be, the epidemiological data are made public, it will be seen that Janet Hughes' attempt to save the Brecon Beacons sheep and subsequent court actions for justice were wholly justified.
Jan 28 ~
"Crooked Britain: Unfit meat"... will be broadcast on BBC Two
today at 8.00 pm.
Unfit Meat - the result of an eight-month investigation by the BBC -"is a
chilling insight into the UK meat industry" says the BBC. See other news page today for comments on this programme
Jan 28 ~ .. symptoms of the insecurity, ignorance and neurosis which ... dominate the activities of DEFRA
A letter from Tom Stockdale of Dumfries in this week's Farmers Guardian"....When there was a problem 20 or 30 years ago MAFF was able to draw upon the expertise that existed in the agriculture departments which were established in the Universities of London, Oxford, Cambridge and Reading. These centres have since closed down so that their graduates are no longer available for employment in DEFRA and Ministers can no longer consult with their professors....Having experienced the catastrophes of BSE and FMD those working in DEFRA are determined to prevent another similar disaster. The plethora of regulations and forms which are being issued are symptoms of their insecurity, ignorance and neurosis which has come to dominate the activities of this organisation....
When there is a problem Government Ministers together with their Chief Scientist are having to go for advice to professors of zoology, epidemiology, neurolgy, economics and the like who have no or little experience of agricultural husbandry. I have no doubt that these eminent academics do the best they can but they cannot fill the gaps left by the well trained and experienced professors of agriculture whose departments were thought to be unnecessary and closed down."
Jan 28 ~ More incredulity over the nonsense of sheep tagging
"Plaid Cymru MEP Eurig Wyn believes that new European Commission proposals for sheep tagging are impracticable and could have a devastating effect on the sheep industry," says today's Western Mail (external link) In the Farmers Guardian, under the headline "'Silly' double tagging plan is impractical" Tim Bennett is quoted as saying "It is absolutely ridiculous, silly and impractical to expect all sheep to be tagged with individual identification. It is hard to comprehend that there are people who believe it is practical to carry out such work. We know as farmers it is totally impractical. It is not a matter of not wishing to comply with identification steps but that it just cannot be done on our sheep farms. The amount of paperwork would be horrendous. We must be allowed to get on with farming and developing our marketing, not spending a major part of our time on paperwork...."
Jan 28 ~ Where would farmers store dead lambs in a busy lambing season?
The banning of on-farm burial of fallen animals is described in this week's Farmers Guardian as an issue of great concern by the NFU's deputy president Tim Bennett. He said it was quite clear that no one could meet the April 30 deadline as there were no alternative arrangements in place. "There is a need for a national service to be established to move stock from farms and the government must pay for it...the whole issue needs more thought and discussion...."
Jan 27/28 ~ An overview of chronic organophosphate poisoning
Dr Sarah Myhill is a rural GP, very interested in OP Poisoning, who runs the OPUS, or "organophosphate users" group. Mark Purdey will be addressing a meeting on the borders near
Hereford
for OPUS on February 12th. Ex NFU president
Simon Gourlay is chairing the meeting, so the meeting should attract some of the non
converted as well as the converted and provide some lively debate.
Organophosphate Poisoning (external link)
By Dr Sarah Myhill Updated September 2001
"Organophosphates (OPs) are extremely toxic chemicals used in farming practice in sub-lethal doses. Every bodily system can be adversely affected by OPs....."read article
It is very interesting that Michael Meacher has now requested a meeting with Mark Purdey in February. (see also the Ecologist article about Purdey's research and his view of the Gabriel Horn Committee's "mix of misrepresentation and outright bogus disinformation" )
Jan 27 ~ Michael Meacher has asked to meet Mark Purdey
See today's Western Morning News " Environment Minister Michael Meacher has ordered a top-level summit to
examine claims that hundreds of farmers have suffered severe health
damage as a result of using toxic sheep dip chemicals that were
mandatory for years.
......Organophosphates were originally developed by the Nazis during the
Second Worl;d War as a nerve agent
Although they have proved highly effective as an insecticide, they have
also been blamed for a number of serious health problems among some
former sheep farmers, including nerve damage, memory loss, shooting
pains and loss of co-ordination." See article
Jan 27 ~ The Inland Revenue is to levy a 40 per cent inheritance tax on farmhouses, farming land and other farm buildings.
See Valerie Elliott's article in today's Times (external link) :"...... Lord Haskins, the Government's Rural Policy Adviser, said: "This must be an attempt by the Inland Revenue to stamp out bogus farming where someone from the City snaps up a big farm, lives in the house and rents out the land. I see nothing wrong with that but if the Revenue is targeting bona fide farming families and penalising them with more tax, then I think this should be looked at urgently."
Sir Donald Curry, chairman of the Policy Commission on the Future of Farming and Food, said: "This could lead to the discouragement of diversification. Anything that obstructs structural change in the countryside would present a problem in delivering the robust and innovative countryside we need....."
Jan 27 ~ Mr Morley says: "the Department is fully informed on the science of TSEs and the prion
protein."
An emailer, William Snape, has sent on to us the copy of a letter from Elliot Morley. Extract: "... no
environmental factors have so far been found to affect the susceptibility of
cattle to BSE. Indeed, the evidence that BSE in cattle was caused and spread
through the feeding of infected meat and bone meal is overwhelming."
Jan 27 ~ "TSE's may be an environmental/industrial disease
.... evidence that hotspots of TSEs exist in regions of the world where there is environmental imbalance between copper and manganese.
Farms in Iceland prone to scrapie have soils with dramatically increased manganese levels. A similar situation exists in Colorado where deer develop chronic wasting disease (9).
These findings led both Mark Purdey and David Brown to hypothesise that sporadic TSEs might be a result of animals becoming exposed to conditions where manganese in their diets is elevated and copper is deficient.
Manganese and copper are ubiquitous metals and it is hard to imagine how the changes in these metals might initiate such diseases. Since the mid 20th Century, however, industrialisation has been fairly intensive, especially in the ferromanganese industry and considerable amounts of manganese are present in pollution.
Indeed lead fuel replacements also use manganese. In Slovakia, there are high levels of both inherited and sporadic forms of CJD around areas of intense ferromanganese industry. Therefore there is the potential for new disease to arise as a result of intense industrialisation.
..........
Although the BSE Inquiry clearly stated that alternative possibilities for the origin of BSE should be investigated and given support, there has been little support forthcoming, despite the fact that most of the evidence linking TSEs and manganese has appeared since that time. ..." Extract from the paper on Transmissable Spongiform Encephalopathies, by Susan Haywood BVSc, PhD, MRCVS and David R. Brown M.Sc, Ph.D, published today in the Veterinary Times.
Jan 27 ~ 40,000 BSE cases born after the 1988 feed ban ...the experts have been
forced to come up with an ever increasing array of implausible reasons
Mark Purdey sends this article:
" I was disturbed to read a recent article in Farmers Weekly about farmers
under threat of prosecution for storing pet food next to cattle feed - due to
the alleged meat and bone (MBM) / BSE risk............ If leakage of micro doses of MBM from pet food poses a real BSE risk, then
why didn't the mega tonnages of pure UK MBM that was shipped to the battery
dairy herds across Saudi Arabia, Libya, India and other third world countries
during 70s, 80s, 90s produce a single case of BSE in those foreign cattle?
Furthermore, why are none of the BSE susceptible pets that are currently
being fed this 'contaminated' pet feed going down with BSE ?
A five year old
child could see the stupidity of prosecuting such an incredibly 'wayout'
causal association .
.........
Once it became clear that the various feed bans had failed to halt BSE ( eg;
the 40,000 BSE cases born after the 1988 feed ban ), the experts have been
forced to come up with an ever increasing array of implausible reasons for
explaining the continuation of BSE - or face the embarrassment of having to
account to their respective Ministers for so many years of barking up the
wrong tree.."(read article).
Jan 27 ~ Of course we acknowledge the need for various other means of disposal, but we reserve our right to continue burying those animals that are special to us."
Alan Beat's editorial in this week's newsletter is about the rule forbidding on farm burial.
"......In April, burial will become illegal and such old faithfuls are to be taken away for some process of rendering that is devoid of humanity and respect. If we permit this, we demean our relationship with our land and livestock - and ultimately we demean ourselves.
Sentimental? No, the word is respect. These sheep had grown up with our own children. Yes, they were pets in a way, but also productive, giving us meat and wool, work and pleasure. Their lives were spent entirely on our land, in our charge. To bury them into the very ground from which they sprang is to complete the natural cycle, and is a final act of respect for lives that had formed an integral part of our own.
The failure to respect livestock, in the broadest sense, underlies so much that is wrong in farming today, in parallel to much that is wrong in human society.
Of course we acknowledge the need for various other means of disposal, but we reserve our right to continue burying those animals that are special to us..."
An unproven risk of animal disease appears to be the reason to impose the most extraordinarily repressive measures - such as this one - on farmers and stockholders. Traffic killed 3,443 human beings in the United Kingdom in 2001. Is the banning of vehicular traffic to "protect" people from being crushed to death on the roads going to be imposed?
Jan 26 ~ The F word
Christopher Booker reveals today that Lord Haskins does not know the name of the ministry for which he works.
".....Debating a motion that "the needs of the countryside are being ignored", Clarissa Dickson-Wright, the television cook, pointed out that our agriculture ministry no longer refers to farming in its title. Lord Haskins intervened to claim that Defra stands for "the Department of Employment, Farming and Rural Affairs".
To much ribaldry from the students, Robin Page, farmer and journalist, explained to Defra's top adviser that its "f" stands for "food"; and Miss Dickson-Wright added that the "e" stands for "environment".
Lord Haskins, whose contempt for small farmers last week earned him Country Life's award as "Villain of the Year", apparently looked "confused".
Christopher Booker's Notebook is essential reading every week. See here how VAT on food is yet another way for Brussels to raise revenue and that Brussels is trying to use Malta's accession treaty to lock Britain into imposing VAT on food within seven years.
Jan 25 ~ Robert Uhlig meets Lord Haskins
In this fair-handed article in today's Telegraph, we read, "He is also unafraid to criticise the Government. The Animal Health Bill, which gives police and officials unprecedented powers to enter farms and slaughter animals, was a "terrible error", he says.
"The Government was traumatised after foot and mouth and they reacted in a knee-jerk manner, bringing in draconian legislation. It is completely over the top."
Jan 25 ~ Livestock burial plan criticised
Published in The Hexham Courant (external link) on 24/01/2003 "...From a farmer's point of view,
it is just going to be an additional cost to get the animal collected,
disposed of, and rendered.
"We are looking at how a collection service could be implemented - It is
being discussed with the knacker men and the farmers. The actual detail of
how something would come on and off the farm has not yet been agreed. It has
been suggested the vehicles could be sprayed before they went onto farms as
the milk tankers were during foot-and-mouth."
Mr Ede suggested sheep, pigs, and poultry could be put into biodigester
tanks which farmers could buy, and which could be sunk into the ground. This
would leave just the animal bones, which could be collected and burned ,or
there could be incinerators on farms.
"It is a difficult situation, and is exactly why the NFU did not agree with
the farm burial ban in the first place. We did not perceive a risk in
disposing of stock on-farm the way farmers had been doing."
The regulations will be implemented on April 30.
"It would be more apt if they were introduced on April 1st," Mr Ede said."
Jan 25 ~ "We will not hesitate to move back to a 20-day
stand-still system if ....if farmers are found
to be flouting the six-day movement system."
The tone of voice used by the anxious but bullying schoolmaster seems rather to the fore at present. If a rule is evidently both unnecessary and harmful it will be flouted. If farmers ignore an idiotic rule it would surely be highly illogical to return to its even more idiotic form? extract from icwales(external link) "..... livestock auction markets will have to sign an undertaking to
operate strictly within new guidelines. And a ban on keeping livestock on
market premises overnight could be introduced later this year." Sign? For the government to insist on a signed undertaking from an industry it claims to be in partnership with is even more indicative of its fear. In a partnership of trust such matters could be safely left to common sense. In relationships in which one side seeks power and control over the other there will always be coercion wrapped up in self-righteous language.
Jan 25 ~ "British agriculture has consistently been the most efficient in the EU"
writes Robert Sturdy MEP in today's Telegraph"... While overproduction should be stopped, and the marketplace rather than subsidies influence the farming sector, we cannot stand by while our funds are simply transferred to southern and eastern European states as well as France." (Read letter)
Jan 25 ~ "practically all the medium sized abattoirs have gone .... those that are still struggling on will welcome the extra business. ."
Our correspondent about the possible looming mass sheep cull has answered our question about the reliability of his source: "He is an active and experienced farmer and Managing Director of our small local abattoir. I think he knows what he is talking about. He pointed out that practically all the medium sized abattoirs have gone or are on their knees - he quoted lots of names - and that those that are still struggling-on will welcome the extra business.
He also expects the hunt kennels to be given licences as knacker's yards so that they can benefit from the ban on farm burial of stock - and a 'sweetener' to cover the banning of their hunting activities.
.....
He has been questioning why his abattoir, having recently updated its drainage to the local water authority's requirements, is to be obliged to collect waste blood for separate disposal. He was told that it must be collected in case it contains rogue prions which could get into the local sewerage systems and hence into water supplies.... he pointed out that rogue prions in the blood would also be in the meat.......
I am seriously worried about the future of our farm and any others in the UK."
The pitiful ignorance of the local bureaucrats would be funny if it were not so tragically destructive. An official who doesn't know that a bullock is "bovine" will never question the validity of the science used to justify stifling levels of regulation. If we felt in 2001 that we were merely cataloguing a bloody disaster caused by incompetence and arrogance - we now feel that we are doing something even worse; helplessly watching as political bullies, motivated by who knows what ends, use the trump card of "Health and Safety" to achieve them.
(See again the letter to Mrs Beckett about EU Regulation and the Survival of the UK Meat Industry)
Jan 25 ~ The body heroically termed the Waste Food Task Force, established by the Food Standards
Agency has produced a timely report.
Yet another consultation document. This one, published on January 23, quickly makes it clear that the FSA sees as a weakness ".... the work of the Meat Hygiene Service; liaison between enforcement agencies, particularly the need to involve local authorities; the penalties available to punish offenders; and the important but anomalous position of the group known as 'food brokers'."
It may well be that these are the very areas of imminent scandal from which the FSA most particularly wishes to disassociate itself. What it makes very clear - in the interests of what it terms "the innocent victims of food fraud" - is the need for the FSA itself :".... This highlights the case for effective central co-ordination and support for enforcement officers working in a variety of agencies. The FSA, as the policy lead and strategic food authority, is the appropriate agency to provide the necessary co-ordination and leadership...."
Jan 25 ~ .... "dangerous contacts" from Welshpool Market, where 40 local farmers refused to let their animals be killed because they did not believe them to have been exposed to the disease, not one later proved positive.
The MEP, Dr Caroline Lucas' introduction to the report (below) Stopping the Great Food Swap: Relocalising Europe's Food Supply makes some interesting comments about the questions that (still) need to be addressed about the UK handling of FMD. Extract:- "Why, for example, did the government hand over control of the epidemic in March 2001 to the computer team led by Professor Roy Anderson of Imperial College, an epidemiologist who had no expertise in the management or control of foot and mouth?
- Why did the government allow its response to the disease to be driven by a computer model that was so fundamentally flawed? Based on poor and incomplete data, not only did it hugely over-estimate the extent of windborne spread of the disease, it also failed to incorporate the different susceptibilities to infection of different animal species.
- Why, when real knowledge existed on the ground locally, was the Government's response so centralised, with people making decisions in the complete absence of vital local experience? Why was the contingency plan so inadequate and so little-known?
- Why, when the epidemic met all of the criteria for an emergency vaccination programme, did the government not adopt such a programme, ignoring the advice of an array of international experts?
-
Why were farmers so consistently misinformed over both the science and law on vaccination? And in particular, why were so many falsely allowed to believe that vaccinated animals would have to be slaughtered, or that they would lose financially if animals were vaccinated, when there is a specific EU provision to compensate them for such losses?...
"Despite saying it wants a review of farming in the wake of the Foot and Mouth crisis, the government has already shown a clear bias to take agriculture further into global competition and large scale farming. It appears to believe that free trade and ever larger, more "efficient" farming is the inevitable and only way forward. ... It is simply not credible, realistic, or fair to ask farmers both to raise their environmental and animal welfare standards and, at the same time, to be ever more internationally competitive in global markets.
If we want higher standards, then we must be prepared to protect those standards in international trade from cheaper imports from countries which do not meet those standards. This will involve hard negotiations at the World Trade Organisation, which currently prohibits countries from distinguishing between products on the basis of the way in which they have been produced.
."
Jan 25 ~ The Great Food Swap - a report by Dr Caroline Lucas MEP.
See the report (external link) "In March 2001, I published Stopping the Great Food Swap: Relocalising Europe's Food Supply. Based on research from colleagues at Sustain and from Colin Hines, the Report outlined the absurdity of our current agricultural system which is based on ever greater competitiveness in international trade, and results in huge number of exports and imports - often of much the same product between precisely the same countries!
For example:
- In 1998, the UK imported over 60,000 tonnes of poultry meat from the Netherlands. In the same year, it exported over 33,000 tonnes back to the Netherlands.
- In 1997, 126 million litres of milk were imported into the UK, while 270 million litres were exported at the same time.
- Of every 100 fruits consumed in the UK, only five will now have been produced domestically.
The Report also sets out the enormous social and environmental costs of such a system, and offers proposals for a radically different way forward, based on greater self-reliance, and fewer imports and exports.
It demonstrates how the constant emphasis on international competitiveness means that farmers are the losers, and proposes changes to WTO rules to enable us to protect our markets from unfair competition, as well as new competition rules to limit the market share of the giant supermarkets."
Jan 24/25 ~ Is a mass cull of UK sheep on the way after all?
An emailer has sent us a copy of a letter sent to his own MP. We find the email deeply alarming and would welcome any information from others. One can only hope that the inferences are mistaken.
" On a recent visit to our local abattoir, taking a steer for killing, I heard some more very disturbing news.
I understand that the abattoir has been approached by a Defra vet to ask them if they would have capacity to devote a day a week to killing 'cull ewes' [i.e. older breeding ewes] later in the year. Further inquiry suggests that Defra is looking around the country's abattoirs to find capacity for killing numbers of ewes equivalent to about 80% of the National breeding flock, and expects to kill this massive proportion of our sheep toward the end of the year.
The consensus seems to be that at that time, Poland will enter the EU, bringing a surplus of cheap sheep; and Defra plans to take this opportunity to organise a mass killing of the British sheep flock
My informant guesses that 'as soon as we start bombing Saddam' the necessary legislation will 'fly through' - to require all sheep identified by the barmy National Scrapie Plan to be killed; and the Defra 'Supervets' will get to work under the umbrella of the Animal Health Bill - or some other unsubstantiated 'TSE' scare will be used as the pretext.
Do you have any information about what is brewing? Is there time to do any thing to prevent a Defra enforced mass killing of our sheep?"
If our informant's contact was correct, this looks very much as though all the strange and confusing spin about sheep, BSE, scrapie, vCJD of recent months has this sad conclusion as its object. It also, of course, makes sense of the lunatic overkill of sheep during the 2001 foot and mouth crisis, the refusal to contemplate vaccination and the quite blatant misinformation put about at the time. We remind readers of the new paper by Dr Haywood and Dr Brown which points out that the one experiment that could prove a link between sheep and vCJD is not being done - and that the excuse is bizarre and illogical in a scientific culture that thinks nothing of injecting live animal brains with disease. Yet, if our informant is correct (as we sincerely hope he is not), this scare - for which the population has been duly and very successfully softened up - will be the reason given. The real reason - if our informant is correct - will be political. Even after all we have witnessed in the past two years this seems too cruel and cynical a conclusion even to contemplate.
Jan 24 ~ Unfit meat scam - are we being deceived and defrauded by the very people employed at great cost to protect us?
We think it very possible that a major scandal is about to blow up. All much depends on a meeting today. The FSA will be watching the situation as closely as we will, no doubt, but for rather different reasons..... The FSA have put themselves firmly at the forefront of all news articles on the subject today - and a strange mixture of spin is emerging where the reality of home-grown fraud and the collusion of officials is blurred with red herring news of recycled sandwiches, the production of "smokies" and the illegal imports question.
BBC 2 Tuesday 28th Jan at 8PM
Undercover investigation into the UK Meat Industry.
Breaches in meat hygiene from farm to factory.
Jan 24 ~The successful control and eradication
of Foot and Mouth Disease epidemics in South America in 2001.
The following
paper has been added to the Biodefense Reference Library http://www.humanitarian.net/biodefense/papers): The successful control and eradication
of Foot and Mouth Disease epidemics in South America in 2001. url:
http://www.humanitarian.net/biodefense/papers/sutmoeller_en.pdf
Extract: ".....Shortly after the end of the first vaccination round, in spite of the relaxing
of livestock movement restrictions, the number of new cases decreased dramatically to
single numbers. A few day after the completion of the re-vaccination round, there only
were a few sporadic cases and at the time of writing (August 2002) one year has elapsed
without further cases.
Thus, Uruguay was able to control and eradicate this extensive outbreak with the
application of livestock movement restrictions and the vaccination of the cattle
population only, in spite of having a large and fully susceptible sheep population in close
contact and proximity to the cattle. ...
...From the Uruguay experience the following lessons can be learned:
......
- Vaccination of cattle only, in combination with livestock movement standstill can
control an extensive outbreak in a very short time, with minimal disruption of the
rural society and economy.
- Strong and continuous programs of education and training of the public and private
veterinary services as well as farmers and public in general are required.
- FMD banks of purified and potent antigens and vaccines must be available for
immediate emergency use.
"
Jan 24 ~ EU Commission lacks courage to reform CAP says FOE
See press release "Environment, taxpayers and farmers all lose out in new proposals
Friends of the Earth is very disappointed by the weak reforms
proposed today by the European Commission. Commissioner Fischler
has significantly weakened the Mid Term Review of the Common
Agricultural Policy compared to the proposals that were presented
on 10 July 2002...."
Jan 24 ~ Another foot and mouth "Nature Reserve"
See Redditch Standard (external link)
"....Throckmorton airfield into a wildlife haven - just three months after the Government scrapped controversial plans to house a 750-bed asylum centre on the site.
The former RAF base, six miles from Inkberrow, where 133,000 incinerated animal carcasses were buried during the foot and mouth outbreak in 2001, is set to be turned into 14 hectares of native grass, a small lake and wetland area.
...........
However, Mid-Worcestershire MP Peter Luff remained cautious about the future.
"The landscaping plans are good news, but I will only be reassured about the health and environmental concerns for the site once the conclusions of an independent study are published," he said.
The results of the study about the impacts resulting from foot and mouth are due to be published in the spring. "
The former plan - after the asylum centre one - was for a science park. Poor Throckmorton. It has been a pawn in a very unpleasant game and the people will never talk glibly of a "free country" again. See warmwell article "...These people who live on the doorstep of the burial site feel that their views have been ignored - not just by Maff/Defra - but for the past decade. They had to suffer a huge expansion of the landfill site at Hill and Moor, then an intensive chicken farm was thrust on them against their wishes, then an HGV depot, and now a mass burial ground for culled animals being shipped in from all over Worcestershire and counties further afield..
The inhabitants of this once pretty little Worcestershire village, now with no shop or school or regular bus service, feel resentful and disempowered...."
Jan 23 ~ 20 day Rule
Jan 23 ~"Injecting human brain material into animals is considered "unethical"....
.... yet "the experiments that are the main support for the hypothesis that vCJD and BSE are the same disease also require that vCJD be injected into the brain of the putative source 'host' animal. Until this is performed, hypotheses of the causal relationship of BSE and other TSE's, including vCJD, remain conjectural and the role of other, possibly environmental, factors must be reconsidered..."
A new paper on Transmissable Spongiform Encephalopathies
by Susan Haywood BVSc, PhD, MRCVS and David R. Brown M.Sc, Ph.D. is published in the Veterinary Times on January 27th The authors "discuss a re-evaluation of the TSE enigma and explore the role of environmental factors in prion diseases."
Extract:
"..... does not conclude that vCJD is caused by BSE, as Phillips implies.
Circumstantial evidence linking the consumption of beefburgers by young people in support of the transinfection theory, whilst persuasive, has never been proven, in that the putative 'infectious' burgers have never been identified, nor indeed fed, to experimental animals.
Groups supposedly more at risk such as farmers, vets, abattoir workers and butchers have not shown an increased risk of vCJD.
It is quite surprising that the one experiment that would confirm a link between BSE and vCJD has not been carried out. If BSE and vCJD are the same strain of disease and take on different characteristics dependent on the host organism, then infecting cows with vCJD should lead to the cows developing BSE.
This would prove BSE and vCJD to be the same disease. However, those who could have carried out the experiments have classed them as "unethical" because of the need to inject human brain into an animal.
It is incontrovertible that, the experiments that are the main support for the hypothesis that vCJD and BSE are the same disease also require that vCJD be injected into the brain of the putative source 'host' animal.
Until this is performed, hypotheses of the causal relationship of BSE and other TSE's, including vCJD, remain conjectural and the role of other, possibly environmental, factors must be reconsidered..
...." Read paper
Jan 23 ~ DEFRA seem to be a little confused as to whether environmental factors
might
be responsible for Scrapie.
"Whilst there is no experimental support for the possibility that an
environmental factor triggers the formation of a novel transmissible
agent,
there is limited experimental evidence to suggest that environmental
factors
could affect susceptibility to TSE's." seen in a letter from Elliot Morley dated 12
January 2003.
Jan 23 ~" even if manganese is just a risk factor, it is important that this factor be kept in the equation, because it might just be the key that unlocks the truth about these diseases. "
A new paper on Transmissable Spongiform Encephalopathies
by Susan Haywood BVSc, PhD, MRCVS and David R. Brown M.Sc, Ph.D
.....there is a solid and expanding amount of literature showing that metal imbalance and TSEs are linked....Mark Purdey, a farmer from Somerset, has published evidence that hotspots of TSEs exist in regions of the world where there is environmental imbalance between copper and manganese.
Farms in Iceland prone to scrapie have soils with dramatically increased manganese levels. A similar situation exists in Colorado where deer develop chronic wasting disease (9).
These findings led both Mark Purdey and David Brown to hypothesise that sporadic TSEs might be a result of animals becoming exposed to conditions where manganese in their diets is elevated and copper is deficient.....The Horn report "failed to note that comparing maps of BSE incidence to a map of manganese hotspots across the UK when the epidemic was well established was inappropriate, since BSE was clearly spread at this stage by recycling infected offal.
A more detailed analysis, looking at the location of the very first cases of where BSE were reported (as viewed on the DEFRA web page,) and the map provided in the Horn report, indicates that the original BSE farms lie directly in a manganese hot spot!
Others, however, have not allowed themselves to be side tracked in this way but concentrated on the scientific evidence. In particular, authorities in the Environmental Protection Agency in Colorado have begun investigating the link between manganese, copper and chronic wasting disease incidence in deer.
This disease was originally thought to be a copper deficiency disease before the prion hypothesis came to be recognised and CWD was recognised as a TSE.
Although manganese might not be 'the cause' it is clear from the biochemical studies that have been carried out that metals do play a role in the pathogenesis of TSEs. Therefore, even if manganese is just a risk factor, it is important that this factor be kept in the equation, because it might just be the key that unlocks the truth about these diseases. ....(Read full paper)
Jan 23 ~ More about the Horn Report
It is interesting to see what Mark Purdey, mentioned in the paper above as having researched the link between metal imbalance and TSEs, had to say about the Horn Report in this article in the Ecologist:
"....Since the BSE inquiry had rejected the official scrapie-BSE hypothesis and found in favour of some aspects of my own theory, the UK government responded by setting up a further mini-inquiry to re-examine the origins of BSE. The resulting publication, known as the 'Gabriel Horn Report', employed a mix of misrepresentation and outright bogus disinformation in order to discredit the validity of my theory. When I attempted to sue the government for libel, it pleaded 'qualified privilege' of the expert committee and then spun out the legal communications beyond the one-year post-publication mark - thereby exempting itself from my claim. See article in the Ecologist by Mark Purdey and the Mark Purdey page on warmwell
Jan 23 ~ David Lidington: Change to 20-Day Rule: at last DEFRA joins the real world
Commenting on the changes to livestock movement restrictions announced today
by Food and Farming Minister Lord Whitty, David Lidington MP, Shadow
Secretary of State for the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
said:
"At last, DEFRA has joined the real world. This announcement is long
overdue......
"It is shameful that the industry had to wait sixteen months after the last
case of Foot and Mouth for the Government to act. Livestock markets have
been forced to the brink of ruin. Some farmers have had to choose between
obeying the rules and making a living. Lord Whitty himself admitted that the
20-day rule could lead to parts of the farming industry being 'wiped-out'.
"Although in July 2002 an analysis of the costs and risks involved with the
20-day rule was recommended by the Government's inquiry into Foot and Mouth,
this analysis has still not been completed and will not be until May 2003.
This kind of inordinate delay places the farming industry under even more
pressure at a time when it is battling to cope with the worst agricultural
recession in living memory. .." See press release
Jan 23 ~ CLA statement on 20 day rule change
"The CLA welcomes Defra's announcement that the 20-day standstill rule for
livestock will be replaced by a 6-day standstill. CLA members have been
severely affected by the 20-day standstill, some so badly that it has
threatened their continued viability to operate.
Animal movement rules should be simple, proportionate and practical, with
wide understanding and acceptance by farmers. The 6-day standstill is a
significant step in this direction. We will continue to work with the rest
of the livestock industry and Defra to develop a workable long-term animal
movement regime.
To generate mutual trust between Government and the industry, it is vital
that Government meets its commitment to implement tighter food import
controls at ports."
Jan 23 ~ "No mention is made here of the rapid diagnostic tests that are available which would radically reduce the amount of testing time required"
The Research Director of the FMD Forum, Jon Dobson, has sent us his submission to DEFRA in response to their contingency plan.
Extract: "Is this because we still await validation to be performed for such tests? If so, when can the final results of the validation work be expected? My understanding, from a conference given early last year in Australia, is that validation results were shortly to be given..."
Jan 22/23 ~ "The agreement between President Chirac and Chancellor Schrvder to freeze the
farm budget from 2006 has forced Franz Fischler, the agriculture
commissioner, to break a promise not to target the largest farms."
See Telegraph today (external link)
Also David Lidington: Another CAP stitch-up for U.K
European proposals for major changes to the system of farming subsidies under the Common Agricultural Policy were published today. David Lidington MP, Shadow Secretary of State for DEFRA commented:
"The CAP needs reform. It is right to move to a world where farmers are free to respond to the demands of their customers rather than of governments.
But the detail of Commissioner Fischler's package includes measures that discriminate unfairly against this country. ....some of the Commission's initiatives are completely contrary to the Government's own strategy for agriculture.
"Issues that cause me concern include the decision to impose the biggest cuts in direct payments on larger farms. This looks likely to mean that British farmers bearing a disproportionately large share of the costs of reform. Plus, is it really plausible to use modulation both to finance environmental schemes and to compensate farmers who stand to lose out from changes to dairying and sugar beet? Do the figures add up? The reference period for the Single Farm Payment will be 2000-2002. Will the Commission's calculations take account of the devastating impact on business of Foot and Mouth Disease during that time?
"Margaret Beckett must negotiate hard for British farmers during this crucial period for British agriculture."
Jan 22/23 ~ " the reforms would impact
disproportionately on the UK and could seriously damage the UK's own rural
strategy."
See CLA press release on the new Fischler CAP proposals "... retreat substantially on the commitment to switch
from production support towards environment and rural development, compared
with those contained in the July 2002 reform paper. It is questionable
whether the projected funding to be switched to Pillar 2 would be sufficient
to achieve the hoped-for environmental and rural development benefits. ......
The principle of decoupling support from production
in order to reward good environmental practice, foster rural development and
reconnect farmers with consumers is, we believe, the right one. However
this must be achieved in a way that is fair across all EU member states......
The UK
currently receives 13% of total CAP direct payments, but could end up paying
twice this share of the cost of the reforms. By contrast, France receives
28% of direct payments and could end up paying less than this share of the
reform costs...." read more
Jan 22 ~ 20-day standstill rule - announcement likely on Thursday
The best - but admittedly most disrespectful - comment received so far today..."everyone will be mightily relieved when the fat lady finally sings. Who knows what those blind and ignorant defra scientists lurking in the dark, windowless bowels of whitehall will try and pull at the 11th hour? It would be highly embarrassing for them to be proved emphatically wrong - again!"
Jan 22 ~ "... farmers are already
doing more than enough."
From Government vision rejected icwales (external link) :
"Farmers' leaders in Wales have hit out at the Government "vision" to improve
Britain's animal health and welfare standards within a decade.
The consultation paper on an Animal Health and Welfare Strategy was launched
recently following the recommendations made in the wake of the
foot-and-mouth inquiry.
....
The paper describes in broad terms the need for "healthy and protected" farm
and wild animals, as well as pets in the home ..........
However the National Farmers Union of Wales insist that farmers are already
doing more than enough.
"UK farmers already meet the most stringent animal welfare regulations in
the world. What we don't want is more 'gold plated' regulations that will
burden farmers with costly bureaucracy and make them uncompetitive with
other countries that import cheap food into Britain that does not meet the
same welfare, or quality, standards.
"Similarly, we need clear and simple regulations to counter and control
animal diseases. The current interim movement scheme is completely
impractical and any new scheme must have the backing of the farming
community, coupled with rigorously enforced food import controls, in order
to protect UK farms from disease." .......
Jan 21/22 ~ Prince Charles wants to "repair, restore and re-create" Britain's lost countryside.
See FWi "The Prince said the public should know that the countryside was an intricate and delicate tapestry rich in heritage.
The 20th century had seen the "persistent unstitching of that delicate tapestry - all in the name of progress," he said.
It had seen the near extinction of native sheep and cattle breeds, rare vegetables and fruit, and more than half of the country's ancient woodland...."
Jan 21/ 22 ~ "We cannot afford to lose our smaller local abattoirs and cutting plants"
"They currently process 49% of UK livestock and are needed to deal with specialist and local meats, to provide jobs in rural communities and to minimise the distances travelled by animals..." See article in the Western Mail
Jan 21 ~ BSE transmission in sheep unlikely
From the Farmers Guardian:
"The transmission of BSE to scrapie resistant sheep by injecting the BSE prion directly into the brains of sheep has no bearing on the possible transmission of BSE to sheep through feeding meat and bone meal, said Moredun virologist, Dr Hugh Reid
He said that, while there was a theoretical possibility that sheep were exposed to BSE and did become infected, all the evidence made it extremely unlikely that sheep represented a possible source of infection to man at the present time.
Moredun workers did not believe there was BSE in the British sheep flock for a number of reasons....
....those animals with potentially the greatest exposure to MBM were the least likely to be affected by scrapie."
(More)
Jan 21 ~ The nation needs the diversity of its meat and livestock industry....We look to DEFRA to defend their interests in the imminent EU negotiations.
Look again at the letter jointly sponsored by the CLA, the Soil Association and the National Federation of Women's Institutes to Margaret Beckett in November about EU working document SANCO/1420/2002 Proposal for Official Feed and Food Controls and 1774/2002 Animal By-Products Regulation. (.pdf external link).
"...charges for all plants will increase very substantially. Large plants would be disadvantaged since they would be less competitive than imports from other EU countries, which do not have the same level of costs as the Meat Hygiene Service. Smaller plants would cease to be financially viable.
If full cost recovery were applied on a plant-by-plant basis, for large meat plants this would mean a probable increase in cost from £2-£3 per livestock unit to £10 per livestock unit. For smaller plants the increase would rise from £3 to up to £100 per livestock unit. These costs are clearly unsustainable and plants would close.
We entirely support DEFRA and the Food Standards Agency's position backing the status quo.
We urge DEFRA to confirm that it will maintain this position in negotiations with the Commission to keep the existing status quo in charging for meat inspection and to keep charges at a proportionate level.
ANIMAL BY-PRODUCTS REGULATION. ..... Smaller abattoirs will have to invest in refrigerated storage tanks, where blood will await collection, probably on a weekly basis. There will be considerable additional expense. There may be planning issues. It is doubtful whether the UK has sufficient appropriate capacity at present to dispose of additional blood. Certainly it does not exist on a regional basis. Disposal will mean substantially increased long-distance lorry journeys, creating additional emissions, hazards and possible nuisance where none existed before. ..."
Jan 21 ~ "This government fails to realise that if something works, don't mess with it." Richard Burge
"The government should be pouring money into markets to ensure they keep going," he said...In France, (livestock markets)
would be getting EU funding and money from the state." Read Farmers Weekly interactive (external link) Alliance joins auction campaign
Jan 21 ~ DEFRA's "contingency plan"
28th Feb 2003 is the deadline for the end of consultation on DEFRA's strange contingency plan which so signally fails to take seriously either vaccination or rapid diagnosis - both of which were effective and available in March 2001 - both of which are developing all the time and merely require the political will for validation and adoption.
DEFRA says: "We intend to maintain the Contingency Plan as a living document. It will be subject to regular review and updates. A version building on comments received and lessons learned in the exercises currently being held will be laid before Parliament at the end of March 2003.
It would be helpful if your contribution could be submitted electronically to the e-mail address below, though hard copy contributions sent to the following address will, of course, be acceptable.
E-mail: susan.ivory-fmd@defra.gsi.gov.uk
Jan 21 ~ Why is it that the Food Standards Agency still has not made a clear statement about the safety of vaccinated meat?
Europe consumed vaccinated meat and milk for over 40 years. Supermarkets sell Argentinean beef - vaccinated at least twice - to no howls of outrage whatsoever. The National Consumer Council Press Officer, Kathryn Williams wrote in August 2001 , we take the view that food from vaccinated beasts does not need to be labelled.
As the world authority, Paul Sutmoller, said of meat and meat products from vaccinated cattle -
- Negligible risk when slaughtered and processed under GMP and according to OIE regulations.
- Disease surveillance, control of the source cattle and slaughterhouse inspections are the main risk reduction measures.
- The (need for) risk reduction by maturation and deboning is probably over-emphasized.
- The fear of mechanical contamination of cattle carcasses with 'carrier virus' from the pharyngeal area during slaughter and processing is unfounded.
Jan 21 ~ If everyone in Great Britain ate one additional cooked breakfast per month it would increase consumption of cereal by 350,000 tonnes, equivalent to the grain grown in Hampshire.
This is Farmhouse Breakfast Week. See article British breakfasts bring home bacon (external link) in the Journal yesterday.
"Rebecca Geraghty from HGCA said: "Over the last few years people have become much more interested in wanting to know where their food has come from and how it has been produced, which has in turn led to an increase in demand for locally grown and processed foods.
"Farmhouse Breakfast Week is the ideal time to celebrate and tuck into the phenomenal range of breakfast foods we offer in this country and the traditional skills that have gone into making them....."
Jan 20/21 ~ CLA's Broadband Campaign - agreement reached
"The Country Land and Business Association's 'Rural ICT Watchdog' has today
reached agreement with BT to test the BT two way broadband Satellite System.
This news will benefit the thousands of CLA rural business members and many
other supporters of the CLA's Broadband Campaign, who are eager to secure
realistic information about obtaining faster internet access in rural areas...." See press release
Jan 20 ~ "We should have liked DEFRA to have applied for a derogation for the smaller abattoirs."
We hear this morning a propos the EU proposal for official feed and food controls and the Animal By-Products regulation
:" The proposed Proposal will go to the Commission at the end of the month, or later. We don't yet know the wording and whether it will go forward as originally drafted, or whether it will be altered to take into account our concerns. We hope that it will anyway not get beyond the proposal stage, as the result of the UK and the EU now realising the implications it will have for the meat and livestock industry, and all that depend on it. Effectively, it would finish it off. The whole industry would be affected, not just the SME (small and medium-sized enterprise) sector because of our disproportionately high inspection costs. Every regulation is an additional cost (always proportionately higher in the UK meat industry than in the rest of the EU, mostly because of the cost of the ;MHS), making UK meat products increasingly uncompetitive. If we lose our meat industry, we lose our livestock and much else beside (as we showed in our letter and memorandum - our landscape depends on livestock who graze it, our arable farmers need livestock to eat their combinable crops). Everything is interlinked.
As regards the Animal By-Products Regulation and the disposal of abattoir blood, this will become law on April 30 (together with the banning of on-farm burial of livestock and the composting restraints). They are all part of the same Regulation.
As regards, the blood issue, we understand that transitional measures have been sought by the UK, but we don't know what they are. The industry is also waiting for DEFRA's Guidelines to be published. These are needed urgently since plants which do not have holding tanks for blood (about one third of all abattoirs) will have to to make structural alterations to their plants (in theory before 30 April) - and in some cases this will not be possible owing to the layout of the existing plant. It has been estimated that capital costs for providing tanks will vary from ca. £2,000 for small plants to up to £25,000 for larger ones. Collection costs will be from £50-£80 per tonne, but low throughput plants this could be considerably more owing to the small volumes of blood to be collected. We should have liked DEFRA to have applied for a derogation for the smaller abattoirs."
Jan 20 ~".. farmers trust auction marts and their professional staff. They turn to us for advice and will abide by it. ......
They may be less willing to adhere to formal orders from what they see as remote organisations although if the auctioneer tells them to do it..they will!" From a statement from Peter Greenhill of Mitchells Auction, Cumbria, submitted to DEFRA as part of the evidence against the current 20 day standstill: "The country has been clear from Foot & Mouth disease for well over one full year. In that time there has not been one outbreak. Legislation such as the 20 day ban is therefore unnecessary and prejudicial to farming businesses especially those in isolated areas of primary livestock production such as The English Lake District. Since this ban was enforced farmers have tried hard to obey the rules but are rapidly losing patience with legislation which is so clearly unfair and untenable....."
Jan 20 ~"About 500 senior Defra civil servants are to be asked to take psychometric tests
to reassess their worth for their jobs. At least 25 officials will be asked to take early retirement, and up to another 75 may be moved to other jobs." Today's Independent (external link) "The economies also follow a multimillion-pound dent in the department's budget from the foot-and-mouth crisis....said Norman Baker, environment spokesman for the Liberal Democrats. "This proves the environment really is at the bottom of the Government's list of priorities."
It would be more encouraging if all MPs were to take psychometric tests to reassess their worth for their jobs
Jan 20 ~ Inaccuracy of reporting at the BBC
A message received this morning: "I note that one of yor e-mailers objects to the reports by the BBC on the gounds of innaccuracies. My experience of complaining is that it is not effective. Has anyone any advice on how to be effective in combating the misleading propaganda promulgated by media and vested interest groups?"
This echoes Pat Rickett's comment last week: "Just to support your correspondent who questioned the tone of Radio 4 reporting about the alleged illegal movements of livestock and the expressed opinion that that such movements had caused the spread of foot and mouth. On The Farming programme earlier Miriam O'Reilly, who by the questions she engenders clearly knows nothing about farming, said "Farmers have clearly learnt nothing from the foot and mouth epidemic". She was of course merely repeating our intellectual Minister Idiot Morley who said exactly this on Radio 4 some months ago.
....
It would be interesting if some air time could be given to Farmers so that they could enlighten the general public on the full extent of what they have learned about inept and cunning government scientists and officials, and ill educated, inarticulate and plain stupid ministers that have more than just a little difficulty with the truth. "
This correspondence followed the extraordinary statements on the BBC last week blaming the spread of FMD on "farmers". You might wish to complain to the BBC via email. Good luck. We have had no acknowledgement yet to our own complaint. See also this email from Elli Logan
Jan 20 ~ The European Commission will press ahead with plans to reform the Common Agricultural Policy this week
Times today "... despite the decision by European Union leaders last autumn to keep farm spending at present levels for the next decade.
The decision will be challenged by France, Spain and Ireland, but will be supported by Britain, Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden." external link.
Jan 19 ~ David Lidington: "Rules put farmers under intolerable strain"
Commenting on reports that many farmers are breaking rules introduced to
prevent the spread of foot and mouth disease, David Lidington MP, Shadow
Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs said:
"This news comes as no surprise. The underlying problem is that rules
introduced as emergency measures during foot and mouth are still in place
and are placing farmers under intolerable strain. Many find it impossible to
comply with the 20-day rule and still make a living.
"It has been seventeen months since the last outbreak of foot and mouth
disease. The Government has had plenty of time to sit down with the industry
and work out movement controls that provide security against disease as well
as allowing farmers and livestock markets to continue to do business.
......" See full message
Jan 19 ~"....the far-reaching effects abattoir closure will have on very varied spheres of interest, such as DEFRA's rural and regeneration strategy..."
"...many of the Curry Report's recommendations, the Countryside Agency's initiatives, the livestock industry, animal welfare, direct and local marketing, consumer choice, the rural economy, the environment and policies designed to reconnect the consumer with farming and the countryside. "in a letter jointly sponsored by the CLA, the Soil Association and the National Federation of Women's Institutes to Margaret Beckett in November about EU working document SANCO/1420/2002 Proposal for Official Feed and Food Controls and 1774/2002 Animal By-Products Regulation. (external link).
"The very varied organisations we represent are all concerned about the widespread consequences this legislation will have on your Department's interests - the environment, food and rural affairs, including farming and animal welfare. This letter will demonstrate to you the breadth and depth of our anxiety about these EU measures. We hope your officials will likewise continue to be concerned about their potential disastrous impact and we intend this letter to provide them with additional support in the imminent EU negotiations on this legislation...." Read whole letter
"The foot and mouth epidemic highlighted the need for local abattoirs, as have animal welfare issues. Many government, government agency, regional, NGO, commercial and private initiatives have already been launched to reconnect farming and livestock production with the consumer and to help sustain and revitalise the rural economy. It is generally acknowledged that SME plants play an essential part in the implementation of a number of these policies. ..." See also the WI memorandum
Jan 19 ~ Ministry wants lambs' ears pierced at a few days old
Booker's Notebook today "Just before Christmas, James Bateman, who keeps sheep on the Mendip hills in Somerset, had a letter from the Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra). He couldn't believe his eyes. As from February 1, it said, he would have to put metal or plastic tags in the ears of his "newborn lambs", carrying a 12-digit individual identification number.
For some years, under European Union rules, sheep farmers have had to tag the ears of full-grown ewes, which is so painful that every year up to 20 per cent of the tags are lost as the animals rub their ears on twigs or fences to get rid of them. "But only some official who had never seen a sheep," said Mr Bateman, "could come up with the idea of trying to tag a tiny lamb, which may be fighting for life anyway."....."
Read also " Fishermen's lifeline is cut"
"Dana, the Irish pop singer turned MEP, was last week startled to discover that the European Commission has diverted 50 million (£33 million) earmarked for the restructuring of the EU fishing industry to Marie Stopes International, an organisation dedicated to promoting abortion and contraception. ..."
Jan 19 ~ "the housewife" has been put forward as the driving force behind the relentless and ruthless strategies to cut costs......
A respected emailer writes today on the same subject as Magnus Linklater's article on supermarkets: "....The final straw came for me in the FMD outbreak when Kevin Hawkins of Safeway, in a television interview in 2001, failed to give clear assurances on the safety of eating vaccinated meat.(we eat this all the time) - he indicated that consumers may not like it, and supermarkets had to respond to their customers. I feel that he thereby served to sow the seeds of doubt.
The power wielded by the supermarkets and their greed have caused me to completely change my shopping habits. I no longer buy my meat and vegetables from my local Safeway (unless dire emergency). I go to a local farm shop for fruit and vegs, to a butcher who sources meat locally, and I buy a considerable amount of meat mail order, from organic farms that stood out against the disastrous contiguous cull of healthy animals in the FMD disaster.
Will Mr Hawkins, or his successor, take note of my protest? I am not optimistic." Read full message
Jan 18 ~".. as a country we should
not become obsessed with cheapness. The government already is."
Jeff Swift in the Westmorland Gazette.
"In the wake of foot-and-mouth DEFRA declared itself in favour of money being
channelled away from production and into environmental schemes. Take the
Environmentally Sensitive Areas Scheme. Money from this is compensation for
carrying out the requirements of a ministry scheme and don't let anyone tell you
any different. The scheme is taken out by the farmer and he or she is
responsible for carrying out the requirements, therefore the money is paid to
that farmer.
Now to return to my point, post foot-and-mouth many farmers decided to go
along with what DEFRA was looking for and, if they were already in the ESA
scheme, decided to increase the area of land say of herby meadowland in tier 1
and perhaps the area of fell for heather regeneration. They signed up with
DEFRA's agreement and guess what happened next? You're probably ahead of me.
Good old DEFRA cut the payments per hectare. I don't know what you call it, but
I call it wanting environmental benefits on the cheap. ....."
Jan 18 ~ BSE in British sheep flock highly unlikely
The Farmers Guardian today has some excellent reporting of the Moredun Research Institute work on sheep, BSE and scrapie. (We shall hope to post this shortly)
The author of research is Moredun virologist Sir Hugh Reid. The Moredun opinion is that BSE in British sheep flock highly unlikely for a variety of listed reasons; no evidence of increasing scrapie in the national flock; no evidence for increased scrapie in those countries with increased incidence of BSE, etc.
The article begins: '"There are increasing links between research work carried out in veterinary and human medicine, especially in the fields of virology and molecular biology. This , in turn, is widening the opportunities for funding of research in these fields."
There is also a report on the front page of the Farmers Guardian that EC figures show BSE cases are declining EU-wide.
Jan 18 ~ 20-day decision imminent
An announcement from Defra softening the 20-day rule to a
six-day standstill is expected from Lord Whitty in the next few days.
Jan 17 ~
NFU Deputy President attacks double tagging sheep proposals
Tim Bennett, the Deputy President of the NFU, has scathingly criticised the
proposed legislation for the double tagging of all sheep at the Annual
General Meeting of the Mid Gwynedd Branch of NFU Cymru.
Mr. Bennett stated: 'It is absolutely ridiculous, silly and impractical to
expect all sheep to be tagged with individual identification. It is hard to
comprehend that there are people who believe that it is practical to carry
out such work. We know as farmers that it is totally impractical.' See DeHavilland Information Services plc article
Jan 17 ~ "The fact that all but one of the premises have tested negative does not mean that the policy of culling out Dangerous Contacts and Slaughter on Suspicion cases is too stringent."
said Professor King - but the memorandum he submitted in November 2001 should be subjected to proper scrutiny.
Much was made, by David King, Elliot Morley, Margaret Beckett and others, of the possibility that Pirbright tests could be inaccurate. The tests were not inaccurate - as Dr Donaldson made perfectly clear to the EFRA committee.
Mr. Yeo: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many farms included in the foot and mouth cull but not recognised as infected premises have had laboratory tests conducted for the presence of foot and mouth; and what proportion of these recorded positive results. [286]
Mr. Morley [holding answer 25 June 2001]: As at 22 October a total of 7,294 Dangerous Contacts (DC) and 255 Slaughter on Suspicion (SOS) cases, which had not been recognised as Infected Premises, had laboratory tests conducted. Of these, five yielded positive results and subsequently became IPs and were recorded as such.
Jan 17 ~ ".. they report
untruths as though a known and accepted fact"
Elyned Ashcroft
of Northumbria in an email: " I am writing to express my anger at the inaccurate reporting of the BBC. It
is bad enough when they allow government Ministers to promulgate untruths by
not challenging them but it takes on another perspective when they report
untruths as though a known and accepted fact. This is what happened this
morning just after 7 am on the 'Today' programme on Radio 4. This morning
the female Newsreader covered the story of "thousands of animals are being
moved illegally by farmers and dealers according to Trading Standards" she
went on to say without qualification that "it was the unrecorded movement of
animals which caused the rapid spread of foot and mouth".
I didn't know that this had been accepted as fact anywhere. We have had not
public enquiries to determine this. I and many others believe that the
delay in imposing a movement ban of at least 3 days in order to enable the
supermarkets to secure alternative supplies had quite a lot to do with it.
Certainly normal trading in animals will contribute to the spread of a
disease which is not caught in time but isn't that what the much encouraged
free market is about?
I wonder if other visitors to your site have picked this sort of thing up?"
See also the BBC report. Farm virus laws flouted
Comments may be emailed to warmwell here or you might wish to complain to the BBC
Jan 17 ~ The solution lies in reforming an industry
that
concentrates power and profit in the hands of the retailers - as the
scramble for control of the Safeway chain demonstrates - at the expense
of
farmers
" Sir
I read with complete astonishment Tim Radford's report of the Royal
Society'
s findings suggesting GM crops can be of benefit to the environment
(Scientists grow 'bird-friendly' GM sugar beet, January 15). These
results
fly in the face of scientific and popular opinion and the results of
previous tests and studies into the effects of GMOs on biodiversity.
But though the Royal Society's findings beggar belief, they are not
entirely
surprising. The GM industry is now clearly clutching at straws: having
failed to persuade the world's public that GM technology will rid the
world
of hunger - and hence bring benefits to the poor - the agri-business
lobby
is now claiming its products are good for the environment.
The fact remains that these latest claims are based on bad science. That
the
research was part-funded by Monsanto, producer of the seeds concerned,
should be enough to destroy its credibility. That its methodology has
been
roundly criticised for failing to meet accepted scientific standards,
its
limited scope, unreasonable and inaccurate assumptions and commercial
irrelevance, certainly is.
Tim Radford correctly identifies conventional industrial farming
practices
as a threat to biodiversity. The solution lies in reforming an industry
that
concentrates power and profit in the hands of the retailers - as the
scramble for control of the Safeway chain demonstrates - at the expense
of
farmers.
If we are to save our farming industry and protect biodiversity we need
to
tackle the industrialisation of the food industry, the unnecessary and
polluting international trade in locally available produce and the
transfer
of profits and control to the multi-national agri-business sector.
Adopting
GM as a weapon in the fight against the crisis facing farmers and the
rural
environment will have exactly the opposite effect.
Yours,
Dr Caroline Lucas MEP (Green, South East England)
European Parliament
Rue Wiertz
Brussels
Jan 17 ~ King's English?
From Examination of witnesses (Questions 460-463) EFRA Select Committee
WEDNESDAY 25 APRIL 2001
463. How many of the contiguous cull farms have you tested?
(Professor Woolhouse) That information is still being analysed, is it not?
(Professor King) Can I suggest, Chairman, that the question may be a little misleading, for the following reasons. We have put forward a policy, a cull policy, that is based on the models but based not on bringing the epidemic under control most quickly but bringing the epidemic under control in such a way that we minimise the number of animals that would be culled at the end of the epidemic. So this cull policy, with the contiguous farm removal, may remove healthy animals that are not incubating the disease, but it is absolutely clear to us that this is the policy for reducing the overall number of healthy animals that would be culled, or healthy animals that would become infected and then have to be culled."
And an answer to the question how many contiguous farms were tested was lost, drowned in vebiage . No answer was demanded.
Jan 17 ~ Zimbabwe is unable to get money for FMD vaccine
....Stuart Hargreaves, principle veterinary officer in Zimbabwe's Department
of Agriculture told IRIN that appeals over the last two years for funds to
buy 2.3 million units of vaccine from its supplier in Botswana had been
unsuccessful..." All Africa report (external link)
Jan 16 ~ 20 day rule decision? Lord Whitty says he is "minded to reach one" in the next few days.
The FWi reports (external link)
"The government is continuing to consider three options, according to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
The first option would maintain the standstill rule which bans livestock from being moved off farms for 20 days after an animal is brought on to the holding.
A second option would see the rule maintained but with substantial relaxations on isolation facilities. This would be similar to the system in Scotland.
A third option would implement a much shorter standstill with fewer exemptions accompanied by additional measures to improve biosecurity."
It will be remembered that the Farmers Guardian held a poll of stakeholders itself about the two alternatives to scrapping the rule.. 88% wanted to convey the message "Neither of these suggestions are suitable for my business or for the industry. Think again please." As John Thorley said, "Whatever system comes in must be simple to operate, allow the industry to trade and offer real health benefits. The 20-day rule offers none of these."
Jan 16 ~ Epidemiological data from the FMD crisis should, by now, be in the public domain.
The impression given, in Parliamentary Answers for example, was that there was
considerably more active infection than was in fact the case. (Animals which
are only antibody positive are not infectious; a fact that did not save the Brecon Beacon hefted flocks.).
As many as 10509 farms were slaughtered, but our understanding is that on less than 13% of these farms was laboratory evidence of foot and mouth disease found. The effect on breeding stock and on certain rare breeds was disastrous; the misery it brought to ordinary people incalculable.
The significance of the laboratory results must come to light eventually. In April 2001 leading FMD experts exposed the faults in the models, but they were ignored, and the mass slaughter policy continued unabated. Laboratory and field evidence supported the arguments of the policy's critics, but the killing went on.
The basic question still remains unanswered; how many of the so-called "infected" premises slaughtered were confirmed positive? It should be possible from existing data to work out the number of contiguous premises that were slaughtered next to actually uninfected premises. A full inquiry into the outbreak would have addressed this. Perhaps the study has already quietly been done. In any event, it is vitally important that the information be made public.
What drives us still - after nearly two years - is our awareness of continuing disgraceful and deliberate obfuscation of the facts. What has been frustratingly clear from the start - not with hindsight - is that the control of FMD UK/2001 by a policy of mass slaughter was not based on sound science, it breached basic standards of animal welfare, it required unethical conduct by participating veterinary surgeons - and it was not even effective in bringing the outbreak under control within a reasonable time.
Jan 16 ~" The fear that vaccination causes FMD carriers and interferes with the eradication effort is completely hypothetical and scientifically unfounded"
A year ago yesterday, Dr Paul Sutmoller presented his paper to the Royal Society of London. There seems little doubt that this was one of the decisive moments of the various FMD Inquiries. At the time of the public meeting in Carlisle, the Royal Society had given the impression that, in their view, the policy that had been adopted was the right one and that their recommendations would not include vaccination.
It is to their credit that they were prepared to be open-minded enough to change their minds.
Indeed, conducting the Inquiry must have been an eye-opener for many on the Committee and not always a comfortable one, for these were scientists already basking in high status who had thought they knew a lot about the issues already.
However, the arguments of why and how vaccination works have at last been fully accepted by the Royal Society report, EU Temporary Committee's Report and EU FMD Directive. What is now needed, as a matter of the greatest urgency, is the political will, both in the UK and Europe, to get the vaccines and tests validated and cleared for use in the UK and the EU.
Jan 15 ~ ".. the despair of farmers who are prisoners of a system over which they have no control."
Magnus Linklater in today's Times writing about the price society pays in condoning the rise of the supermarkets : "I do not care whether Morrison, Wal-Mart or Sainsbury's wins the battle for the Safeway chain, because all of them share one aim, the need to grow bigger and faster and persuade us all to eat more, in order to survive. Instead, all we do is get fatter and sicker. The time has come to curb our appetite for cheap food, not to encourage it.....the sheer craziness of the superstore oligarchy affects our lives. For years, successive governments have been urging consumers to eat more locally produced food, and telling farmers that they must diversify. The agricultural industry has been advised to create new markets rather than rely on state subsidies.
Superstores, on the other hand, do everything they can to circumvent these aims. In order to guarantee cheap food, of uniform quality, eternally fresh and instantly available, they have streamlined production lines to the point where few local sources can gain entry. ..... The days when local farmers delivered produce to the back door are long gone........
No local producer or retailer can possibly match the cheapness or quality of these monopolies, hence the despair of farmers who are prisoners of a system over which they have no control. Even their "niche" products - a new farmhouse pâté, perhaps, or a locally produced gourmet cheese, will be copied and then produced more cheaply elsewhere. And anyone who protests is ruthlessly squeezed out.... "
Jan 15 ~ "The Mirage of Process is the retreat into reorganisation, delegation, consultation or inquiry."
wrote Matthew Parris in the Times last August.
"....Beyond the rejigging of personnel, the reordering of lines of command and authority, rebranding, relaunching and the renaming of everything in sight, we now also have blue-skies thinkers, vision statements, mission statements, big-picture artists, charters, "aims and objects", targets, pledges, aspirations, goals, task forces, inquiries, "tsars", thinkers of the unthinkable and joiners-up of government..... " Read the article
We recall these words as we read about Margaret Beckett's purge at DEFRA (£20 million has been allocated to early retirement and redundancy
schemes ), the £137,510 spent developing DEFRA's new logo and identity, "consultation" exercises that fool nobody for even more regulations, for which there is always said to be "a scientific basis", concerning animals - and an endless, endless stream of words often in execrable and ambiguous English (such as DEFRA's priceless statement that "animal health can cause damage to the rural economy".
Matthew Parris' article, even more timely now as the government chaotic activity includes actual war as well as the harrying to death of British farming, concludes:
"This Government, in short, has been a management consultant's dream. Everything about British Widgets plc has been dissected, reorganised, revamped, reconsidered, restructured and relocated -- except for the humble widget itself: the product.
Nobody talks about the product any more. Tiptoe into a drinks reception in which consultants, politicians and marketing people are networking each other, and shout "The product! BOO!" -- and watch them throw themselves under tables, dive for the doors and leap from the windows.
Through all the ups and downs of the past 30 years in British politics I cannot remember a time before this one when less was changing, or greater change was being proclaimed."
We'd agree - except that in the chaos of all this displacement activity farmers are having to sell up and retrain as plumbers and the creep of strangling regulations seems unstoppable.
Jan 15 ~ "I am disgusted that the British Government would even contemplate that I could be of some threat to my country."
writes Nick Green from Cumbria. " I had to enrol the assistance of specialists to confirm my phone was tapped during 2001. As an indigenous Englishman whose family has lived here for generations, I am disgusted that the British Government would even contemplate that I may be of some threat to my country. The truth is I wasn't a threat but, like many others, I had the ability to severely embarrass certain individuals.
....During the latter stages of FMD I received a leaked document proving a Government Minister had been "economical with the truth" concerning the "Voluntary Cull" undertaken in Cumbria. The source was never established exactly, but we were confident of the position the sender of the memo held.
I had waited for more than twelve months for more information to land in my "In Tray". Then, out of the blue, a document arrived at my house addressed simply "For the Immediate attention of Mr Green." .
These documents are now stored very securely. Certain circumstances will result in their immediate release to the press. Meanwhile I am going to sit back & watch certain individuals "hang" themselves." See message
Jan 15 ~" a nail
in the coffin of many farmers and reduce consumer choice"... Rapacious Wal Mart is hoping to evade investigation from OFT
Friends of the Earth has urged the Government to ensure that
Wal-Mart does not evade an investigation by Competition
authorities into its bid to take over Safeway. Wal-Mart, which owns Asda, is hoping to reach agreement with the
Office of Fair Trading that if it sells off enough stores the
merger will be allowed to go ahead
The competition authorities are required to consider whether
significant mergers of this type are against the public interest.
Friends of the Earth is warning that even if Wal-Mart sells off
enough stores to avoid a "monopoly", the deal will still be a nail
in the coffin of many farmers and reduce consumer choice. See Press Release
Jan 15 ~ Robin Feakins is not giving up.
Mr. Feakins has asked for permission to appeal against the wretched judgment handed
down on 20th December in favour of DEFRA . We can only applaud his stand.
Jan 15 ~ Animal Health Bill came into force yesterday
As the FWi (external link) put it: "...The legislation gives the government power of entry on to farms for the purpose of vaccination, serological testing or slaughter of livestock.
It grants officials the ability to cull animals to prevent the spread of disease in the event of another outbreak of foot-and-mouth.
The act also includes measures to tackle scrapie in sheep..."
Did not an amendment in the Lords require the Government to use the latest technology at the time of testing and diagnosis? Where has there been any official mention of such state of the art tests? Let us hope that the Government remembers the words of its own Lord Carter on November 7th 2002 when he said, "no Government in their right mind would consider slaughter in future if an alternative were available."
Jan 15 ~ "Interferon could cover vaccines' weak spot."
This was the headline in an article last week by
Helen Pearson, in the respected publication Nature. It was about a new vaccine developed by Marvin Grubman of Plum Island Animal Disease Center.
"Vaccination was shunned by vets in 2001 as too slow to take effect," wrote Ms Pearson.
"An antiviral drug could avert future foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) epidemics, scientists say. Combined with vaccination, the drug gives slow-acting vaccines time to kick in.
More than 6 million animals were slaughtered in 2001 as Britain struggled for 7 months to stop FMD tearing through farmyards. Vets shunned animal vaccination because the virus jumps from herd to herd before vaccines can take effect...." (more)"
Although several of her facts are inaccurate, no one would doubt that having faster acting vaccines is clearly something desirable and obvious. (It will be remembered that there was very little "fast-acting" slaughter in the favoured culling policy - the only thing that would have made it worthwhile. Delays in slaughter negated the point of the policy and led to the unchecked virus spread it was intended to prevent.)
With faster acting vaccines, the emergency vaccination response advocated by the Royal Society and the EU could be more strategic and involve smaller areas. Models that were used to justify the culling only policy were unrealistically pessimistic about rate of vaccination and onset of immunity and those involved were slow to listen to sense. They consistently underestimated the impact of vaccination on the transmission process. They assumed quite wrongly that the virus would move in a similar way to that which occurs in a non-vaccinated population. ( The paper on Transmission on warmwell explains this succinctly.)
Jan 15 ~ Professor King's knighthood criticised
We read in last week's Farmers Guardian that "Critics of the foot-and-mouth cull policy, which led to the slaughter of an estimated 10 million animals in 2001, have attacked the decision to award a knighthood to the man behind it, Professor David King.
..... The Prime Minister's decision to award him a knighthood in the Queen's New Year Honours List provoked an angry response from opponents of the policy. ..." (More)
We remember Professor King's replies to the Temporary Committee on FMD at Brussels on May 30th 2002. The point was made that the model was flawed. Prof Donaldson's paper from the Veterinary Record of 12 May "Relative Risks of the uncontrollable (airborne) spread of FMD by different species." was quoted from.
Professor King was dismissive, and said that since they had used more than one computer model criticism of one wasn't significant.
However, the flaws in the model cannot be dismissed so lightly.
There was "no time" for even the most tactful and gently probing cross-examination - but that his answers failed to impress can be seen from (for example) paragraph 25 of their Final Report:"25. From late March onwards, the British Government based its decisions on epidemiological models. The mode of transmission of the virus did not play any part in the models, according to statements by the head of the British Government's scientific advisory group. The appropriateness of the unvalidated models used to plot the course of the epidemic remains scientifically controversial and in particular is challenged by veterinary scientists with FMD expertise. The models used ultimately resulted in the proposal at the end of March 2001 for the novel 24/48 hours contiguous culls (i.e. slaughtering susceptible animals at infected farms within 24 hours of the infection's being diagnosed and slaughtering susceptible animals at neighbouring farms within 48 hours) - a strategy which was fraught with inevitable lax biosecurity and documented infringements of animal welfare law."
No apology has ever been received, no acknowledgement ever made by those responsible for the tragic mistakes of 2001.
Jan 14 ~ "Neither of these suggestions are suitable for my business or for the industry. Think again please."
The Farmers Guardian (Jan 10) "Over 600 people responded to our poll and just 11 of them (2 per cent) voted to retain the 20-day rule but with more exemptions and easier conditions attached to them. The option of replacing the 20-day rule with a shorter standstill but with no exemptions was slightly more popular, polling 64 votes (10 per cent). But an overwhelming majority, 535 people (88 per cent), rejected both options. They chose option 3 in our poll, which said: "Neither of these suggestions are suitable for my business or for the industry. Think again please." A stakeholders meeting on the 20-day rule is scheduled in London next week. The FG reports that John Dawe, chairman of the county NFU said, "The 20-day rule is the number one contentious issue that is raised at every meeting and this poll confirms what I have been hearing. Farmers say the 20-day rule is completely unacceptable and do not believe we need any movement restrictions at all"
Commenting on DEFRA's proposed alternatives to the 20-day rule, he said the conditions attached to exemptions made them 'completely useless'. "One of the key messages will be that rules that make no sense do not get adhered to," he said.
NFU head of livestock Kevin Pearce said, "We need to return to a situation where farmers have confidence in Government and Government trusts farmers."
National Sheep Association chief executive John Thorley, commenting on the FG poll result, he said: "Whatever system comes in must be simple to operate, allow the industry to trade and offer real health benefits. The 20-day rule offers none of these."
Jan 13 ~ "The Foot and Mouth year brought home to me how completely industrial farming had subdued the nation and how mindlessly it was accepted."
Today's stories on warmwell all have the same theme - the alienation of people from farming because of industrialisation and an imaginary feeling of powerlessness in the face of mindless bureaucracy. Hilary writes, "More than a century ago, Jung moved from the country, where he had been brought up, to go to university in Basle. He noticed that people in the city - all of them - were neurotic and he quickly realised that this was because they had lost contact with nature.
He felt that losing contact with nature was, in itself, enough to make people neurotic.
I had the same feeling, differently expressed, when I started Surrey Docks Farm in the 1970's. The dreadful alienation of people in the abandoned docks wasn't just the result of unemployment. They were alienated from themselves, each other, and their surroundings.
When I started to dig the silt and graze my goats and poultry in Surrey Docks, I was surprised by the urgency with which everyone wanted to join in. And joining in made a real difference to their lives. Kids who had only been interested in destruction wanted to make things. People who had never related to anyone or anything started to relate to my animals.
......Dot Boag was one of the converted. She didn't need Surrey Docks Farm, but she recognised its purpose. She inspired me to write this diary. She also said someone should write a book cataloguing the mistakes of the Foot and Mouth year. She believed that if people knew what had gone on (and what still goes on), change must follow.
People flocked to the farm to tell me that kids think milk comes out of bottles and quote vandalism statistics and sociological theories. They set about using the farm in all sorts of wonderful ways I would never have thought of. ......" Read about Surrey Docks Farm
Jan 13 ~ Fischler's proposals will kill off British beef production says NBA.
Robert Uhlig in today's Telegraph: " Roast beef under threat from EU subsidy changes....The traditional joint of British roast beef is threatened because tens of thousands of cattle farmers plan to retire in two years, when subsidy reforms come into effect.
The National Beef Association says proposals to be unveiled next week by Franz Fischler, the EU agriculture commissioner, will kill off British beef production.
Farmers' leaders said that without cattle grazing, vast areas of the countryside, including the South Downs, the South-West and large parts of Wales, could be overrun by gorse, bracken, brambles and hawthorn within a few years.
Under the proposals, part of radical reforms of the Common Agricultural Policy, farmers will no longer be paid according to the number of animals they keep or the area they cultivate.
Instead, subsidies will be "decoupled" from production and all farmers will receive a single annual payment, even if they do not produce food.
Provided they keep land in agricultural condition - mowing pastures, draining ditches and maintaining hedges - farmers would receive a payment based on the average of their subsidies from 2000 to 2002...."
Jan 13 ~ "Here is the nightmare future that awaits the UK as political and farming leaders join forces to embrace it"
writes Alan Beat in the latest smallholders newsletter, particularly important in view of Robert Uhlig's article above.
"This is contained within a long article entitled "Power Steer" written by Michael Pollan that first appeared in the New York Times on March 31st, 2002.. ."Poky Feeders, population 37,000. Cattle pens stretch to the horizon, each one home to 150 animals standing dully or lying around in a grayish mud that it eventually dawns on you isn't mud at all. The pens line a network of unpaved roads that loop around vast waste lagoons on their way to the feedlot's beating heart: a chugging, silvery feed mill that soars like an industrial cathedral over this teeming metropolis of meat.
Every hour of every day, a tractor-trailer pulls up to disgorge another 25 tons of corn. Around the other side of the mill, tanker trucks back up to silo-shaped tanks, into which they pump thousands of gallons of liquefied fat and protein supplement. In a shed attached to the mill sit vats of liquid vitamins and synthetic estrogen; next to these are pallets stacked with 50-pound sacks of Rumensin and tylosin, another antibiotic...."
The article opens our eyes to just what has happened to beef production in the US - and what will happen here when decent beef production is wiped out. The writer concludes:
The economic logic behind the feedlot system is hard to refute. And yet so is the ecological logic behind a ruminant grazing on grass. Think what would happen if we restored a portion of the Corn Belt to the tall grass prairie it once was and grazed cattle on it. No more petrochemical fertilizer, no more herbicide, no more nitrogen runoff. Yes, beef would probably be more expensive than it is now, but would that necessarily be a bad thing? Eating beef every day might not be such a smart idea anyway -- for our health, for the environment. And how cheap, really, is cheap feedlot beef? Not cheap at all, when you add in the invisible costs: of antibiotic resistance, environmental degradation, heart disease, E. coli poisoning, corn subsidies, imported oil and so on. All these are costs that grass-fed beef does not incur...
Read this important article
Jan 13 ~ Farewell to Dot.
Today's funeral of Dot Boag will illustrate the difference that "ordinary" people can make to a world that seems to have gone mad. Instead of sighing and turning the page or turning away, Dot became wholly engaged with the issues of Foot and Mouth, travelling across the country to cheer people up and stand next to them, writing letters in favour of vaccination, researching the science, going to listen to the opposition and trying to reason with them and above all, being there. She went to everything. Her anger at the crassness and cruelty of little men with power was an inspiration to those of us who thought we had no power at all. And the humour and fun with which she set about her task reminded us too that sentimentality has no place in the struggle. Faced with people who think that there is no such thing as good and evil - only politics, Dot showed us all that, on the contrary, fighting for good is what makes life worth bearing. If we, the ordinary people, leave things to the politicians, all the things we value in England will disappear and the world itself will become unfit for human beings. Dot's legacy will live on. Not everyone can be like Dot - but all consumers can stand up for themselves at least. "Dot said that housewives are used by
big business as the excuse for their rapacity, but they are never
consulted. Perhaps, if they
were consulted, their views could change the face of British
farming. For example, if they knew about the
crisis in dairy farming, quite a small number of housewives putting a card in the box
of their local supermarket saying they would pay more for local milk could
change supermarket policy" (extract from Hilary Peters' edairy).
See also Fordyce Maxwell in the Scotsman today (external link) on the way he perceives "The buying public will have the final say on animal care, with many putting
cheap food before welfare..."
Jan 12 ~ Bovine TB - compassion for the health of cattle and badgers
Vaccination strategies for health
Dr Ruth Watkins BSc Hons, BFA Oxon, MBBS, MSc, MRCP, MRCPath, in a new article sent to warmwell, writes "I find the strategies for health of humans in our society, modern Britain, have been neglected or disregarded by the veterinary establishment for farm animals - BSE was the start of the consequences of so doing. DEFRA and the veterinary establishment have failed to recognise that humans are animals too. The farm animals must be as remarkably similar on genetic analysis to humans as mice have proven to be. The immune system must be very similar to our own. The control of disease by killing farm animals is promoted unashamedly and no apology made for failing to apply methods in human medicine to the care of farm animals as in the FMD epidemic of 2001.....
...I have been to a lecture (Pathogenesis of infectious diseases: emerging aspects held 14th Nov 2002 Royal College of Pathologists) given by Dr Mark Doherty from the Statens Serum Institute in Denmark that manufactures BCG and PPD, a purified protein derivative..... Badgers can be immunised orally with BCG, they love chocolate so Dr Doherty suggested they could be given chocolate containing BCG, "badger chocolates". Cattle can also be immunised, more practically by subcutaneous inoculation as in humans - it will cause an ulcer at the inoculation site in them as it does in us. The immunity is at least partially protective in both species.
PPD is used as a specific skin test for immunity, the TB-test in cattle, the Heaf test in humans....
Just as the killed (inactivated) FMD vaccine is in effect a marker vaccine as it has been purified excluding the non-structural viral proteins so it turns out that BCG is also a marker vaccine. ......The presence of gamma interferon in the test indicates the animal has been infected with Mycobacterium bovis at some point in the past. Such a test has been licensed by the FDA for use in humans for Mycobacterium tuberculosis and has been developed for cattle for Mycobacterium bovis I understand from Dr Doherty. Infection can be distinguished from vaccination. The tools of modern medicine are there to be used to combat the spread of Mycobacterium bovis and ultimately to eliminate the infection. ...." Read whole article
Jan 12 ~ "..the nightmare of the 20-day rule that closes a farm down for 20 days as soon as an animal comes onto the farm"
Jeff Swift's latest column in the Westmorland Gazette :"....What worries me is that the Prime Minister says "British farming must be modernised". Did he not say that about the National Health Service, the railways etc. So my New Year's message would be farming has been modernising for years and we've got the receipts to prove it. So forget any modernistic ideas, we can stand most things, but not those. Look at globalisation, but don't become obsessed with it. Then, instead of promising the South Americans (where foot-and-mouth is endemic) that you will try to persuade the EU to take more of their beef, get behind British farming, it won't let you down, it never has.
The backbone of our agriculture is still the family farm. In times of dire need it can feed the nation. We all hope the DIRE NEED does not present itself, but don't be too sure it won't. Also don't forget what I told you about France regarding its agriculture as "her green oil" - she never forgets it.
Finally, I wish DEFRA a trouble-free year with its High Technology. Farmers
have, unlike their EU counterparts been kept waiting months for payments due to
them. When asked for the reason DEFRA say they have problems with the computer.
So that's all right then. Whatever you may think about their computer it's a
very convenient one - for DEFRA. What would I do? I would get a bigger handle so
they could churn it faster. It's being so cheerful that keeps us going. " Read article
Jan 11 ~ Protests against the 20 day standstill rule " took place at Defra offices in Truro, Taunton and
Gloucester - and outside the South West, at places as far afield as
Carlisle, Preston, Leeds, Stafford and Lincoln..."
reports the admirable Western Morning News, one of the few independent sources of news left in England.
"...John Dawe, chairman of Devon NFU, said he was optimistic that the
message would get through to Secretary of State Margaret Beckett and
Defra.
.....farmers say it is a Draconian ruling to have in place when
there are no diseases in the UK - and have called on Whitehall to put
into place stricter biosecurity at airports and ports in the country.
They also want the livestock standstill removed completely.
"The vets understand our problem, because we deal with them on a
day-to-day basis; sitting in a London office it is perhaps more
difficult to understand," said Mr Dawe.
"We are convinced that we as farmers have done as much as we can to
improve biosecurity within the country - now it is the turn of the
Government to stop putting the pressure on us and tighten up security
over meat imports.
"Nowadays farmers have so much paperwork to fill in to do anything - it
sometimes feels like we have gone back to school because we have had to
learn so many new skills....."
"......if you buy a cow, you cannot sell calves at the market, if you buy a
ram, you cannot move lambs for slaughter.
There are all sorts of various complications involved with filling out
forms and many farmers have great difficulty in understanding what forms
they need to fill out to do anything. Instant decisions are what's
required in agriculture - this rule prevents that."
It is not just the farmers it has had an effect on. Alan Venner,
chairman of Exeter Market Auctioneers, says the livestock markets have
been hit by the rule......"
Read more farming stories from the WMN yesterday
Jan 11 ~ "welcome to the nightmare of individual sheep tagging"
A contributor to the Smartgroups FARMTALKING FORUM writes:
"We have had it (sheeptagging) in Ireland for 8 months. I have 34 ewes and 125 hoggets which will probably be slaughtered for mutton. [in 1991 my father and I lambed 970, but I've had to quit on Doctor's advice - too many cortizone injections into strain injuries ]
Today I ordered 25 replacement tags to cover the tags lost [mostly to sheep wire]
The E.U. commission don't realise how difficult tagging is.
Fischler is from Austria. I've been there. If there is 100yds of sheep wire in the whole country that's about the limit. They don't have a single flock bigger than 100 ewes thats about it as well.
... Farmers will have to keep ALL records for 3 years after the sheep or lambs death, even if the lamb is slaughtered at 12 weeks of age, and be able to produce them at a moments notice to an unannounced Government inspection....the "reconciliation " clause - states that you must gather all your sheep at least once a year, and be able to account for the identity of any sheep with a missing tag. [ No record - no subsidy or EU grant ]
On an average Irish 1000 ewe mountain flock which has been "put to the hills" for summer grazing, 20 will die [ and be eaten by carrion ] and 20 will return without tags [tear out in shrubs, gorse etc.]
Now your fun begins. Which to which, especially if you have bought sheep into your flock.
Another E.U. regulation dreamed up by an official with a paper qualification, who probably never was on a farm in his life." smartgroups@molecularfarming.com
.
Jan 10 ~ 20 day rule protests today
See, for example, /icberkshire.icnetwork.co.uk (external link) "..The National Farmers' Union has arranged nationwide demonstrations outside
Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) offices up and
down the country.
Farmers from Berkshire, Hampshire and south Oxfordshire are expected outside
the Defra offices in Coley Park at 11.30am tomorrow.
NFU spokesman William White said: "The NFU has always argued that the
industry needs movement controls proportionate to the risk.
"This rule is over the top, not easily understood by farmers and it is
difficult to enforce."
Telegraph Robert Uhlig (external link) : "Hundreds of farmers' leaders will lobby Government vets' offices across the country today to try to overturn livestock restrictions introduced after foot and mouth. They will hand in letters pleading for the 20-day standstill quarantine on all livestock movements to be revoked."
Jan 10 ~ Sheep and Goat tagging - the European Commission proposal for the identification and
registration
of sheep and goats.
See EU Proposal. The EU is very keen to impose a "one size fits all" system of tagging "to determine rapidly and conveniently the place of origin of an animal or carcass and its movements throughout the Community. The purpose of this is to prevent the further spread of diseases."
DEFRA is consulting the big players on the proposal.
In view of the
impractability of individual identification of sheep it is to be hoped that the response will be robust.
The EU proposal:
(a) requires all sheep and goats to be tagged in each ear with an individual identification number from 1 July 2003;
(b) requires from 1 July 2003 farm registers to contain precise information on the identity, sex, breed and genotype (if known), month of birth and death of all animals on the holding as well as movements onto and from the holding.
(c) requires from 1 July 2003 documents accompanying each batch of sheep and goats being moved to be issued by the competent authority and to contain precise information on the identity, sex, breed and genotype (if known), month and year of birth of individual animals and movement details of the batch.
(d) requires from 1 July 2004 a central register of holdings keeping sheep and goats.
(e) requires from 1 July 2005 a computerised central database containing information on the movement of each batch of sheep and goats moving between holdings.
(f) allows for the immediate replacement of one tag with an electronic identifier with the use of the electronic identifier becoming mandatory from 1 July 2006.
DEFRA says, "The proposal recognises that the introduction of general electronic identification would require more detailed technical guidelines and requires the Commission to report to Council by 31 December 2005 on the introduction of electronic identification based on assistance from the EU's Joint Research Centre at Ispra.
The proposal also establishes that the granting of aid (ie Sheep Annual Premium Payments) would be dependent on compliance with these proposals."
Jan 10 ~ The use of "other tests not included in the OIE Manual, is permitted provided that the performance of the test has been shown to match or exceed the sensitivity and specificity parameters laid down ..."
Some extracts from the EU Draft Directive on FMD " 5.4. Rapid and detailed diagnosis of the disease and identification of the relevant virus are of paramount importance and should be carried out under the auspices of responsible laboratories which must be networked between themselves and the co-ordination of which should be ensured by a a href=ated by the Commission after consultation of the Member States in the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health. Contrary to previous expert advice and in line with policy pursued by the Commission over the past decade, the 2001 outbreak confirmed that laboratory capacity, expertise and sound scientific competition in the field of foot-and-mouth disease diagnosis must be maintained in as many Member States as possible.
Annex Xlll 2. Alternative procedures
The use of tests defined in the OIE Manual as 'Alternative Tests', or other tests not included in the OIE Manual, is permitted provided that the performance of the test has been shown to match or exceed the sensitivity and specificity parameters laid down in the OIE Manual or in the annexes to Community legislation, whichever is the more stringent.
Annex XV2. National Laboratories must provide an uninterrupted service for diagnosing vesicular viral diseases and must be equipped and skilled for providing a rapid initial diagnosis.
9. National Laboratories shall collaborate with the Community Reference Laboratory and other National Laboratories to develop improved diagnostic methods and exchange relevant materials and information.
Jan 10 ~"Clearly, safety and MAFF regulations were not the controlling factors here, but rather a desire to exploit their privileged position as the World Reference Centre to restrict competition."
From the letter submitted as evidence to the Royal Society (Edinburgh) Inquiry by the Director Patent and Licensing Affairs United Biomedical Inc. about the reluctance of Pirbright to let them have access to sera "..... IAH-Pirbright is now involved with a competitor of UBI for the commercialization of their own NS test so it appears that their lack of cooperation may have been due to an economic conflict of interest. To put a kinder light on it, perhaps they simply decided to retain an intellectual exclusivity to FMD immunoassays.
Either motivation is equally unethical and retarded development of FMD immunoassays. Without access to the Pirbright World Reference Centre collection, we were unable to fully standardize the UBI tests at that time..We believe it is perfectly OK for them to profit from their own tests, but as the publicly funded OIE-designated World Reference Center, it is improper for them to reserve their resources to themselves or to use an arbitrary standard to exclude companies from the ranks of qualified FMD researchers. (Unfortunately, an anti-company attitude is more pervasive among FMD researchers than it is in most fields of the life sciences and in this age of biotechnology, this attitude needs to be seriously questioned.) ..Dr. Brown and others at the USDA
also have been working on a device to detect FMDV RNA by PCR, in real-time, in
collaboration with Tetracore, Inc., another U.S. biotechnology company. This
project is also worth your looking into, independently of IAH-Pirbright. .UBI has not been involved with that project.
UBI also has an FMD vaccine program. IAH-Pirbright has provided advice and has offered access to their facilities. The conflict of interest seems to be limited to diagnostics." More
Jan 10 ~ "it is a breach of duty that this has been allowed to pass"
Extract from Dr Watkins' Submission to the Royal Society of Edinburgh FMD Enquiry
"....
On the 9th of March 2001, an offer of help came from the USDA collaborating with Tetracore to provide a sensitive real time PCR farmgate test
and if required an experienced team to carry out the work. It had been successfully laboratory tested by the USDA and required validation in the field.
Its convenient size, speed and simplicity of use was even demonstrated here on BBC television (Tomorrow's World April 2001) by Tetracore.
But Pirbright turned down the offer on the grounds of lack of time.
Seven months later Pirbright took the very same machine and started their own laboratory trials
Failing in the first instance to get good results, they went to press (The Veterinary Record 6 Oct 2001)* where they falsely claimed that Cepheid, the manufacturer of the PCR machine, had recommended and provided the wrong materials. Later in the same letter they triumphantly claim success by changing to those they would 'normally' use - Cepheid do not provide or give advice on test materials. ......They (Pirbright) have also insisted that they could not use an anti-NSP test, as it also was not validated. Antibody to non-structural virus proteins (NSP) enables vaccinated herds or flocks to be distinguished from infected ones. Again they use their own in-house test rather than validate any commercial anti-NSP tests, also offered them during this epidemic from UBI for example. What is going on at Pirbright?
Pirbright has confined itself to in-house tests, producing the materials and developing its own protocols.
It has refused to undertake validation of commercial FMD tests such as those produced by Michael Walker at Genesis. There is no other laboratory in Britain that is allowed or could undertake to validate FMD tests -
it is a breach of duty that this has been allowed to pass..." (more)
Jan 10 ~ British government officials, livestock owners, practitioners and other interested parties should know the pedigree of this technology.
See referenced article on the Real-Time PCR equipment "It was essentially driven by the needs of the U. S. Defense Department, to detect biological threat agents quickly, in the field and with such a high level of confidence that there would be time to take protective measures (Higgins et al., 1999). To solve these problems, the Defense Department initiated revolutionary approaches to pathogen detection. One of these is the portable real-time PCR machine, which is now widely deployed. The term "real-time" refers to the ability to monitor all stages of the reaction and identification as it proceeds, rather than to have to wait until the end for a result. "Portable" means that the device is taken to the site of the problem and operated there by the military - it is not confined to a central laboratory staffed by trained microbiologists. .
...Reagents are produced to ISO 9000 standards and weekly updates of quality control and quality assurance data for each batch are available over the Internet. Sample collection, preparation and the assay itself can be completed in 90 minutes after arriving on site, but positive results can be obtained much earlier..
....The system is designed to coordinate Government officials, academia and private industry, cooperatively, to focus all available resources on immediately stamping out such an introduction through quick, targeted and science-based interventions.
....Consequentially, in future, the British people - once aware that such amazing and proven science is available from our friends across the water - will not tolerate the little Englander attitude and medieval approach....
" (More)
Jan 10 ~ Farm Strategy could be a poisoned chalice admits Don Curry
From FWi : ".....Mrs Beckett confessed that even the pilot broad and shallow environmental scheme did not have a gauge to measure its success.
"I suppose it will be deemed a success if the Treasury releases the money to fund it," she said.
Sir Don Curry, who is overseeing the implementation of the farm strategy, admitted that it could be a "poisoned chalice".
But he said he hoped he had not been set up to be the "fall guy" if the government's plan failed.
"We have an independent committee of nine very able and very committed industry representatives who are working very hard to ensure the farming community benefits from this plan."....See FWi report
Jan 9/10 ~ "no major food scares from animal products or any other animal-related public health scares" ...and no animals perhaps?
Newcastle Journal (external link) ".... Animal health and welfare minister Elliot Morley told a briefing yesterday: "This is trying to look ahead for the next 10 years and pull together the various strategies that we already have in place.
"It takes into account the recommendations in the recent foot-and-mouth inquiries and the Future of Food and Farming document.
We will be asking key questions about the potential role of private vets, the responsibilities of animal owners and the current balance of Government intervention."
An overriding aim of the strategy is to restore public confidence in food derived from animals.
By 2012, the paper says, steps should have been taken to reduce risks from pathogens in food, which humans can pick up and become ill from eating animal products or handling animals.
It also wants "no major food scares from animal products or any other animal-related public health scares".....
Jan 9/10 ~ NFU starts big push on 20-day standstill
Anna Lognonne of the Journal writes:"Farming groups are stepping up their calls to the Government to scrap the controversial 20-day standstill rule.
National Farmers' Union members will tomorrow be handing in letters to Defra at animal health offices across the country, calling for an end to the unpopular rule.
It will coincide with a series of farmers' demonstrations tomorrow at Defra offices across the country.
....
NFU Cumbria County Chairman Will Cockbain said: "The livestock industry has taken significant steps to tackle the issue of disease risk.
t is now important that Defra recognises this and works with the industry to introduce more realistic and appropriate measures that are capable of improving biosecurity on a broad front.
The need for controls has been accepted but the industry can no longer afford to be regulated by the lowest common denominator
.......
If we embrace the measures adopted by the industry since February 2001 and build on the principles of biosecurity then there is absolutely no need for a whole farm standstill - of any length."
...." (More)
Jan 9 ~ Rapid Diagnosis PCR tests: a peer-reviewed publication, lab validation,
and successful field tests in South America.
Roger Breeze's ProMed posting of May 2001. Yes, as far back as May 2001 - getting on for TWO years ago. Much has
moved on since then, including a peer-reviewed publication, lab validation,
and successful field tests in South America.
Extract: "These devices offer rapid real-time detection and
identification by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays, are designed
for use on farm at the site of the problem as hand-held or portable
units, and communicate real-time data via the Internet to those who need
to know in order that immediate action can be taken.
..... The system is specifically intended to support
immediate detection on-site by operators with limited training, not just
by highly-trained personnel geographically restricted to centralized
laboratories.
........ The FMD assay requires minimal sample
preparation and results are available in less than 2 hours after
collection. The assay detects all 7 FMD virus serotypes and
differentiates the virus from near relatives and from swine vesicular
disease, vesicular exanthema and vesicular stomatitis viruses. In
experimentally-infected animals, FMD virus can be detected well before
the onset of clinical signs of disease.
......
instead of taking the sample to the expert in a central laboratory, the
system takes the analytical data from the farm to the expert, so that any
comment can be immediately returned to the person performing the analysis
on the site. The system thus offers a time saving of at least 24 to 48
hours in definitive detection of virus. If time is gained, multiple
alternate courses of action become possible for those charged with
controlling the disease outbreak. This is the true significance of the
system."
Jan 9 ~ FMD Contingency Plan: no reference to new technologies - rapid field diagnosis and linked GIS systems. On the contrary:
DEFRA's Contingency Plan (external link)
"8.2 Transport of samples
8.2.1 DVMs will ensure they have access to local couriers to transport blood samples during an animal disease outbreak as per SVS standard instructions."
So is there really no plan to use the already available and excellent real time PCR tests?
Defra is continuing to maintain its option of slaughter on contiguous premises and of "firebreak" culls:
"7. If FMD is Confirmed (through Clinical Examination or Laboratory Test)
.....
Further action will depend on the circumstances of a particular outbreak and depending on the scientific and veterinary advice. Additional options and strategies which are potentially available include:
- emergency vaccination (either to live or to kill, within an area or in a ring around an area);
- culling of other livestock exposed to the disease (e.g. premises under virus plumes, contiguous premises); and
- (subject to the Government's Animal Health Bill becoming law) pre-emptive or 'firebreak' culling of animals not on infected premises not dangerous contacts or not necessarily exposed to the disease, in order to prevent the wider spread of the disease outwith an area."
No stress on the importance of targeted vaccination, which requires better diagnostics/detection technology and better data management than indicated in this paper.
But an "open consultation" is certainly a welcome development - if it means what it says. It is hoped that interested parties will contact DEFRA about this. Email: contingency.comments@defra.gsi.gov.uk
Jan 9 ~ "As long as we have the effective mechanisms of surveillance, identification and reaction, it doesn't matter where the disease has come from, it's how we react to it,"
Elliot Morley said, launching a three-month consultation document that aims to draw up the 10-year animal health and welfare strategy. The News 24 report earnestly assures us that "Cattle could be on the frontline as the threat of a potential terror attack spreads from Britain's streets to its fields..." that "British authorities are to step up surveillance against bio-terrorism amid concerns that rogue groups could target the food chain by seeking to introduce animal diseases such as foot-and-mouth or the brain-wasting mad cow disease" (Beware fundamentalists bearing syringes.. they'd have to inject the brains of the cows, the favoured method for spreading TSEs - and someone might well notice. ) The same article
informs us that " Mad cow disease, formally known as Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE), spread through Britain's beef herd in the 1980s and 1990s and more than 100 people have died from the human form of the disease."
But DEFRA, (formerly and less formally known as MAFFIA), is on hand to calm our fears.... "As long as we have the effective mechanisms of surveillance, identification and reaction, it doesn't matter where the disease has come from, it's how we react to it...."
"Effective"? Are the mechanisms effective now? Could someone tell us how, why and when they changed?
Jan 9 ~ Defra announces that "animal health" can cause damage to the rural economy
One of the most important recent criticisms of DEFRA (apart from their abysmal English) is that their stakeholders' meetings - while appearing to be, in current Government Newspeak "open and transparent" - are, in fact, often closed and murky. They tend to be directed to powerful, narrow interest groups who fight like robber barons for their own territory - not for the industry as a whole. Many have no voice at all. We read in the summary of the new Animal Health and Welfare Strategy - "....Our recent experience of foot and mouth disease highlights the scale of damage animal health can have on the rural economy and the need for the Strategy to be developed in close partnership with interest groups both within and outside the farmed livestock industry..." We wonder who unblushingly composed that odd phrase "scale of damage animal health can have" and notice again the convoluted language of self congratulation. All this is anything but reassuring.
Jan 9 ~ £2 million anticipated for Defra's Horizon Scanning Strategy
for Science in its first year.
According to this DEFRA press release, the Horizon Scanning Strategy
for Science
is "designed to fund research projects which challenge Defra's
current thinking and help to develop policy based on sound science"....."Defra
is also scoping (sic) research needs in other science related to Defra's mandate
......."The horizon
scanning programme is a core part of Defra's Science and Innovation
Strategy, due to be published in May 2003. Professor Howard Dalton, Defra's
Chief Scientific Adviser, said: "Defra is keen to turn this strategy into
action. Horizon scanning is critical for modern organisations. It enhances
our ability to think 'outside the box', and for policies to be informed by a
better understanding of what may be in store for us. There is a wealth
of untapped ideas in the scientific community and I look forward to working
with partners and stakeholders to start turning these ideas into
action."
So there we are. Cliché upon cliché. Two million pounds more next year for government funded scientists to scan the horizon. It would, of course, be grossly ungrateful for anyone to ask what it would cost to get them to see - or indeed smell - what is under their noses. Geoffrey Lean, writing in the Independent on Sunday, informed us that
"The control of pollution from Britain's most dangerous factories and waste tips is in danger of "falling to pieces" because of government cuts" so it is nice to know that research projects to encourage Prof Dalton's unboxed thinking are still being generously funded. (It took his predecessor, David Shannon, until his job with DEFRA expired to give an unboxed view of Prof David King's science group : 'It had enormous power with no direct responsibility, it seemed to me. It was driving what the Department was doing - and of course if there were any flaws in its composition or mode of operation you could have a flawed mechanism driving policy...it needed more independent expertise on diagnostics, practical expertise on the use of vaccines...And experts must listen to the public; that's one of the important things we must do much more of. Understand where the public's coming from. For example, about vaccination for foot and mouth...")
Jan 8 ~ "The government's refusal to hold a public inquiry saved the Prime Minister, Ministers and officials the humiliating and potentially devastating experience of public inquisition over their failures."
writes Alistair Driver in this week's Farmers Guardian: "But that didn't mean the thirst for answers and accountability went away. Particularly when the 'independent' alternative, the Anderson Inquiry, failed to get to the bottom of the affair due to a mass outbreak of 'forgetfulness' within Whitehall. December's harder hitting EU Inquiry and the subsequent EU Directive based on it that puts vaccination to the fore, may finally have brought a degree of closure.
The government's failure to apologise did not help. A little humility would have gone a long way but Margaret Beckett's confession that 'with hindsight' the government may have done things differently was not good enough. Instead it has seemed hell bent on pinning the blame on farmers. This is epitomised by its failure to clamp down on illegal imports, but parallel determination to introduce an industry levy to pay for future outbreaks, maintain draconian movement restrictions and pursuit of extra powers to cull animals through the Animal Health Bill.
In all that the 20 day rule is the single issue that has angered farmers more than anything else - the ultimate symbol of a government that does not understand how the industry works and Ministers who are too dependent on their London based advisors.... "
Jan 8 ~ Mrs Beckett's 'Strategy for Sustainable Farming and Food' reads more like a 'Strategy for convincing the public the government cares about British farming'.
writes Zac Goldsmith in the "That was the Year That Was" section of the FG. Despite positive aspects - increased environmental payments, simpler regulation - behind the scenes it's agribusiness as usual directing the government's agenda, pushing the myth of 'free' trade, while ignoring the near monopoly supermarkets hold over farmers.
Our task is clear. Get past the political spin and engage the public directly. Farming should be the business of everyone, not just those milking excessive profits out of the food chain.
Given the quality of the people we've met at farm's regional meetings, who have rung, emailed and written to us, I'm confident there are enough farmers out there who share farm's vision and aren't prepared to meekly walk Lord Haskin's plank into the sea."
Jan 8 ~ NFU demonstration against the 20 day standstill rule in Carlisle this friday
An emailer writes: "Did you know that the NFU ( yes the NFU) have arranged a demo this Fri at 10-45
at Hadrian House Defra offices in the centre of Carlisle? I am no longer a member;
I cut my card up and sent it back during FMD - but I will still go..." Good for the NFU.
Jan 7 ~ "Franz Fischler, wise man, cancelled his date with the Oxford farming conference this week."
writes Fordyce Maxwell in today's Scotsman
"Whatever official reason was given for that decision by the European commissioner for agriculture, the most probable political reason is that he did not want to be questioned about his mid-term review plans for EU farm policy.
His original plans took a buffeting last year, especially from the German/French backroom agreement to retain common agricultural policy spending virtually as it is until at least 2013.
But Fischler has been a European commissioner for a long time and is intent on leaving a legacy.
With no intention of throwing in the towel, he has manoeuvred decoupling - the separation of farm subsidy payments from production - and modulation - diverting a percentage of farm subsidies to rural development - back on to the agenda.
He plans to publish details of his latest proposals this month. That is why he did not want to speak at Oxford or be asked questions. Instead, judicious leaking of the proposals is coming from Brussels, mainly centred on farmers in future getting a single annual payment based in some way on their history of production payments. ..."
Jan 7 ~ Farmers will have to become more responsible for food safety and the environment if they want red tape cut, Donald Curry will tell the Oxford Farming Conference
The
Oxford Farming Conference begins today with the title "Real Solutions for the Future." ( See Journal article)
Sir Donald Curry will talk about how his report has progressed over the year. He plans to tell delegates that Government will only be encouraged to intervene less if farmers " take on more responsibility for their actions, via strategies such as farm assurance schemes."
Also on the opening day, Margaret Beckett is going to talk about "Defra's plans to bring stability to the countryside after more than half a decade in economic depression" (Will this differ much in substance from Lord Whitty's parliamentary reply on Dec 18? telling delegates of the government's "innovative and practical solutions to the challenges faced by those involved in the food chain"? )
Franz Fischler will not be at the conference. He had been scheduled to talk about the mid-term review of the CAP. However, stepping into the breach, Lord Haskins has agreed to present a paper entitled "Why there is a future for British agriculture"
Jan 7 ~ Lord Whitty is pressing for new proposals to ban children under 16 from driving tractors.
See Shropshire Star (external link)
"Robert Eyres, of Llanyblodwel, near Oswestry, is one of many farmers who believe that the initiation of children into working practices on the farm is vital not only to farming culture, but to the survival of the industry as a whole.
He says his sons aged 18, 16 and 14 are an invaluable source of support in running the farm.
All three began learning to drive tractors at the current legal age of 13.
"I value their help. Staff are hard to find."
Jan 1-6 ~ "we did attempt to validate Fred Brown's test and it didn't pass the validation"
said Professor David King on the Today Programme (Dec 18)
We will remind readers again of what actually happened since Professor King doesn't seem to remember. Here is an extract of the letter sent as evidence to the Royal Society Enquiry
It was also sent to the Lessons Learned Inquiry and given by hand to Lord Whitty
...Our real time PCR assay for foot and mouth disease (W) has been validated in the laboratory: it has proven to be a pre-clinical test for infection in cattle, swine and sheep, it detects all 7 serotypes of FMD virus and differentiates this infection from other viral diseases that cause similar clinical signs.
The test is more sensitive than viral culture and will detect as few as 10 virus particles....
Some eight months after we had disclosed the existence of our x;h/lD test to Dr. Donaldson, we read in the Veterinary Record that the Pirbright Laboratory had subsequently established a relationship with Cepheid and conducted some experiments with FpvfB reagents supplied by that company (data published by Alex Donaldson and others in the Veterinary Record, 2001).
I have no idea what those reagents were because the paper does not describe them. But I can be sure that these reagents were not those developed by USDA-ARS and Tetracore because Cepheid does not have this proprietary information.
I hope there has been no confusion in Britain between the Cepheid mystery test and the real time PCR test developed at Plum Island...."
The research paper with these results appeared in the Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.
For Prof King to continue to suggest that "we did attempt to validate Fred Brown's test" is absurd. There was indeed "confusion in Britain between the Cepheid mystery test and the real time PCR test". In the Veterinary Record on 6 October 2001, "Evaluation of a portable, 'real-time' PCR machine for FMD diagnosis", Alex Donaldson and his team reported poor results, stating that:"The reagents used in the assay were recommended by the manufacturer of the instrument" - but of course they were not recommended by the manufacturer, only by Cepheid - who, of course, didn't know and were guessing. Had the real time PCR test been properly trialled with the correct reagents - in other words, if the US offer had been courteously accepted - the story of FMD in 2001 would be very different. But Professor King told the EFRA Committee that "there are very serious questions to be asked about the use of that machine in the field, in particular the problem of cross-contamination". If one studies the letter and compares it with what Professor King and Dr Donaldson were saying in March 2001 at that EFRA Committee meeting one is struck by a feeling of great regret at what may well have been a genuine but tragic mistake.
Jan 1 - 6 ~ And today's Sunday Scare Story is......DEFRA to be in charge in the case of bio-terror attack
("Sunday scare story"..see Simon Jenkins in the Times last week.) Under the headline Bioterrorists may mount foot and mouth attack
Mark Townsend
in
The Observer today writes: "....Neil Thornton, director of
animal health for the Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs,
said the threat of bioterrorism had become a 'legitimate area for us to
cover'.
The devastating impact of the last foot and mouth outbreak underlined its
potency as a potential weapon. ..." and (of course)
"Suspicion has focused on Iraq, amid fears that President Saddam Hussein
ordered research into the military application of foot and mouth. " Our reaction to this report is certainly terror if DEFRA is to be in charge and Mr Thornton is talking about a legitimate area for us to cover.... Sauve qui peut...
See also today news from the Independent (external link) that DEFRA can no longer afford to safeguard the country against internal pollution let alone an external threat: "....The Environment Agency, whose responsibilities include flood control,
fishing and recreation as well as regulating pollution, is being starved of
funds by Margaret Beckett's Department for Environment, Food and Rural
Affairs (Defra). Pollution control has suffered most, in spite of an
increased workload caused by EU directives.
The crisis is the result of parsimony and discrimination within Whitehall.
Defra is being squeezed by the Treasury to punish it for the enormous sums
spent by its predecessor, the Ministry of Agriculture, on combating the foot
and mouth epidemic two years ago.
Defra's environmental division is, in turn, squeezing the Environment
Agency, with pollution control absorbing the bulk of the cuts. The result,
says the agency's finance director, Nigel Reader, is that its environmental
protection work is facing a "funding gap" of £12m...."
Jan 1 - 6 ~ FSA prosecutes abattoir for its help in emergency
As warmwell reported on Dec 11, the FSA in its weird logic, is prosecuting 74 year old William James for doing his best to help the government. Christopher Booker writes: "
.......
When the foot and mouth epidemic erupted in 2001, Monmouthshire's farmers and vets were only too grateful that the Raglan abattoir had survived. Animal movement restrictions had faced them with a welfare crisis. The only place to which healthy animals could be moved was a slaughterhouse and, to the delight of ministry officials, the Jameses came to the rescue.
After spending thousands of pounds on equipment necessary to comply with biosecurity rules, they were soon working flat out to meet the crisis, even though this sometimes meant slightly exceeding their weekly limit. But everyone was happy, including the Meat Hygiene Service (MHS), part of Sir John Krebs's Food Standards Agency (FSA), which stamped the meat as fit to eat.
More than a year after the crisis was over, however, Bill James was astonished to be summoned on a string of criminal charges. He was to be prosecuted by the FSA for having several times during the crisis killed a few more animals than his licence allowed - even though he had only done so with full official support, including that of Wales's rural affairs minister, Carwyn Jones, and the MHS's own inspectors. Apparently the FSA hierarchy was now afraid that it might face legal action from the EU's Food and Veterinary Office for not having strictly enforced the terms of Mr James's licence.
Last month, when Mr James explained to Newport magistrates why he had exceeded his limit, they gave him a conditional discharge, and ordered him to pay only £250 of the £2,268 costs demanded by the FSA's barrister, Ian Thomas. Mr Thomas pompously observed that the laws that Mr James had broken were only there to ensure that hygiene standards were not endangered; scarcely relevant since the MHS had certified all the meat as perfectly safe to eat.
So, at 74, Mr James has a criminal record for committing a technical offence, which could only be seen as such by some frightened bureaucrat, and which he had only committed to help the community in a way which had the approval of all the officials involved." Read Booker's Notebook
Jan 1 - 6 ~ Prince supports fair trade scheme
See report in the Western Mail.
"The Prince of Wales yesterday gave his support to a pilot scheme which combines fair trade and organic farming standards.
Charles told the Soil Association annual conference at Cirencester in Gloucestershire, via a video message, that the fair trade theme could be a "major influence in encour-aging exactly the kind of farming systems we need to see in the 21st Century"......The Prince said he was most encouraged to hear about the scheme which makes a new organic certification available to UK producers for the first time.
He added, "It seems to me that this initiative, if it is taken up in the market place, could quite literally transform some of the current trading relationships, which so often seem to take place in a climate of fear and mistrust, rather than transparency and openness.
"Of course, the same principles should also apply to non-organic producers - it could be one of the salvations for the small family farm, which we need to defend at all costs.
"But with this scheme organic consumers, at least, will be able to have confidence that the farmers who produce their food are getting a fair deal. This will be a real step forward."
Jan 1 - 6 ~ Lord Haskins should resign and someone who can plan for the near future be appointed to advise the Prime Minister
Re: Plan for the future Date: 5 January 2003 Letter in the Sunday Telegraph" (external link) "The Prince of Wales was quite right to recommend consumers to buy British food products (News, Dec 29) (external link). For Lord Haskins to describe the prince as "unrealistic" is funny to say the least.Thirty years ago agriculture was one of the best industries in the UK. For several reasons it is now in a parlous state. We cannot be self-sufficient because England is already over-populated, but we should produce as much food as possible. During the past 30 years, global warming has speeded up. Climate change has been considerable, and flooding could become much worse. If large areas of food-producing land became flooded, then countries such as Holland, France and Germany would be concerned that their own populations were fed, and food would not be available for export. Perhaps Lord Haskins should resign and someone who can plan for the near future be appointed to advise the Prime Minister.
From:Stan Hone, Clacton-on-Sea, Essex
Jan 1 - 6 ~ "we are still left with this ludicrous 20 day rule .."
The Farmers' Union of Wales has urged all Welsh local authorities to follow Gwynedd County Council's example in calling on the Government to revoke the 20-day livestock movement ban. (see news report)
We are grateful to Nick Green for this comment from Cumbria and for sending an article by
Mike Sanderson, the Appleby NFU Secretary from the Cumberland & Westmorland Herald, 28th December 2002 :
"....The first thing everybody wanted to see disappear was the bureaucracy involved with anything to do with moving livestock but, although some of the licensing eventually slipped away, we are still left with this ludicrous 20 day rule which stops everything moving off a farm for three weeks after an animal has moved on. It makes no sense whatsoever and the result is that farming livestock in the area is nigh on impossible.
The rule encourages illegal movements and has also been quite legitimately and legally got around by moving stock and off holdings to suit the paperwork. This makes for extra unnecessary movements, which is exactly the opposite of what is wanted.
.....
There are no boffins, vets or politicians in London brave enough to get out of their ivory towers and come down on the side of common sense. Surely a sensible and less onerous system would deliver more of what all sides want."
The Farmers Guardian's "Enough is Enough" campaign asks farmers to vote on the 20 day rule. To Retain the rule (with more exemptions and easier conditions) phone 09010312331, to Reduce but with no exemptions except in emergency condidions, phone 09010312332
To Reject the 20 day rule because "neither of these suggestions are suitable for my business or for the industry. Think again please) phone 0901 031 2333 (phoning is simply a voting mechanism and no personal details are asked for)
Remember that Mary Marshall had some practical suggestions for revising the rule. See her suggestions to DEFRA on the 20 Day Rule
Jan 1 - 6 ~ "if this group can't solve the problems then change planets now"
writes an enthusiastic Chris Stockdale (farmer) from the Soil Association conference in Cirencester at which Fairtrade for British farmers was much talked about. Chris says, "Fairtrade is underway; there will be some difficulties. For example, Fairtrade producers, many of whom are desperately poor, are wary of seeing their lifeline dissappear into the hands of the globally priviledged first world producers. We in the EU appear to them to be hiding behind protective trade barriers, with, to them , astronomical subsidies. Persuading them of the iniquities of the CAP (ie 20% of the farmers receiving 80% of the money) will take some doing. Additionally, Fairtrade is a global network so the UK branch will have to persuade all the others that this is a good thing -- they are not all organic.
That said, I am convinced that it is a very good thing, just what we need.
I met Ruth Watkins, whose recent article I had broken off from replying to to attend -- thus delighted surprise to see her there. It is my first Soil Association Conference, as a guest of the SA , two more days to go and I wouldn't miss them for anything. .... Zac Goldsmith expounded his ideas .. Helen Browning, .. Lord Melchett..Jonathan Dimbleby, ..Craig Sams,(Whole Earth and Green and Black's Chocolate) Peter Segger (Organic Farm Foods) ... not to mention a whole host of others you would have heard of through FMD and other; Also an impressive art display ....
Further update to follow , but yes, I have known most of these key movers for some decades and honestly, this is the best show in town; whatever one's reservations (and the Sainsbury's lady was given quite a hard time) If this group can't solve the problems then change planets now. "
Jan 1 - 6 ~"Fair-trade, Organic. Jolly good. But not to the detriment of non-organic but just as caring British Farmers..."
Roger has sent us his thoughts about the Fairtrade pilot project, by which companies selling products from UK farms as well as from developing countries and elsewhere, can apply to carry the FAIRTRADE and Soil Association marks. Extract: "The World is a big place these days, especially with the Baltic States already being given gifts of persuasion to their farming industries to help them join a wider EU. It is going to be tough for our farmers with all this added competition. I do not want to be insular and I'll try and support those people who, because of climate, produce food that we cannot. But charity begins at home. We obviously want a fair price at the farm gates and to remove as many middle-men as is possible. But it has to be at BRITISH farm gates.
Another thought. Who is going to Police all this. DEFRA ?"
Jan 1 - 6 ~ "Fewer amenities, poor communications, struggling farmers and many rural businesses still suffering from the long term effects of the Government's and EU Commission's mismanagement of the Foot and Mouth crisis."
Letter in Northern Echo yesterday
"Sir,
The Price of Wales was quite correct last week to urge Hospitals, Schools, public bodies and Government Agencies to buy British produced food, which currently they seldom do.
.....
Rather than support and welcome this Royal advice, Lord Haskins, Tony Blair's advisor on farming, has accused the Prince Charles of being out of touch and having a romantic view of the countryside.
The reality of life in rural communities is; less amenities, poor communications, struggling farmers and many rural businesses still suffering from the long term effects of the Government's and EU Commission's mismanagement of the Foot and Mouth crisis.
The only people that are out of touch live in the Westminster Village who believe that country life is a walk in St James' Park feeding the Ducks.
Peter Troy
Jan 1 - 6 ~ "Tony Blair says he is committed to a thriving agriculture that produces a fine countryside, but the other week he said: "We can't do this alone - we need the co-operation of farmers."
writes Jeff Swift in this week's "Over the Gate" from Cumbria. He continues: "Fair enough but how about some co-operation from his Secretary of State at DEFRA. You know, the one
who refused to be helpful by agreeing to be photographed tasting British
Beef in Paris. Incidentally, I understand she has been seen to taste Argentine beef. If that was not enough she did not visit Smithfield Show, the British Farmer's and ancillary industries shop window, she sent her junior minister. I'm not even going to mention the scientists or technicians who when trying to find BSE in sheep, were found not to be testing sheep brains at all, they were cattle brains. So you see, when the Prime Minister says he could do with some co-operation, join the club, so could we. ..."
Jan 1 - 6 ~ "...very substantial powers, which are having increasing effects on our lives. "
".....even if political leaders now deny their ambitions to create a United States of Europe, mocking claims that it is to become a "super-state", the original agenda remains unchanged..."
The making of this website has led us to a greater understanding of the danger of centralisation. In the foot and mouth crisis local expertise was contemptuously swept aside and billions of poundsworth of illogical damage inflicted from offices in Central London - themselves constrained by Brussels. Much agricultural legislation and most regulations now seem to be stark staring mad. One EU size does NOT fit all.
Is England (the very word is politically incorrect) sleepwalking into giving up its quintessential character and its genial common sense by allowing itself to be hoodwinked into thinking our final absorption into the EU is inevitable and right? Let us at least get educated about the new government that is taking over all aspects of our lives. Many have already retreated away from its apparent complexity into a sort of pulling of the covers over their heads; a sad but understandable obsession with the interior decoration of their own homes and gardens.
Dr Richard North has, at our request, sent us the first chapter of The Great Deception
The Secret History of the European Union - A Briefing.
It will help us make a start on that essential self educating process. Extract:
".... The respective roles of the Monarch, Parliament, and local authorities, were relatively clear. But traditional structures have been augmented by remote, little understood bodies - the Commission, the Council of Ministers, the European Council, the European Parliament, and the European Court of Justice, all with powers and responsibilities which are far from transparent. In addition to UK law, we now have to deal with EU directives, regulations, decisions, and recommendations, bringing a whole new vocabulary and level of complexity to the process of government." (read more)(broken link mended - apologies)
Jan 1 - 6 ~ "Under the pilot project, companies selling products from UK farms as well as from developing countries and elsewhere can apply to carry the FAIRTRADE and Soil Association marks."
"....Under the pilot project, companies selling products from UK farms as well as from developing countries and elsewhere can apply to carry the FAIRTRADE and Soil Association marks.
"Many farmers around the world are suffering from prices for their products which do not cover the cost of production, and this is certainly true in the UK. People talk about the food chain in the food industry but in reality it's a fear chain," said Patrick Holden, Director of the Soil Association. "Everyone involved is frightened of losing out - the buyer of not meeting his profit margin, the packer of being de-listed by the supermarkets, the grower of rejects or being priced out of business. Existing trading practices contribute to this problem and this new scheme will help promote the changes needed to ensure a fair return to farmers.......A commitment to human rights and social justice are already an integral part of the principles which inform organic agriculture and processing, and are recognised as such in international organic standards. For the Fairtrade Foundation, a vision of a more equitable trading system that provides sustainable livelihoods for farmers, workers and their families is at the heart of its work and Fairtrade standards define ways in which producer organisations and their trading partners can realise this...."
See today's press release from fairtrade.org
Jan 1 -6 ~ "The Prince also sees the sense of the UK remaining relatively self-sufficient in food at a time when global situations can change very unexpectedly."
"Continuity and accessibility of supply are important at a time when the world faces increased risks from terrorism and political instability."
David Lloyd, writing in the Daily Post, seems not to be impressed by Lord Haskins' contempt for Prince Charles' support for British Farmers
icnorthwales
"
Is this recognised by Lord Haskins? After many years in charge of Northern Foods, he must be aware of the interests of the major food retailers.
He also knows that the Prime Minister and Defra ministers favour fair dealing and partnership throughout the food supply chain.
And of course he will be familiar with the recent House of Commons study which accused food retailers in Britain of being greedy and creaming off huge profits, leaving both farmers and consumers poorer...."
Jan 1 - 6 ~EU plans could be end for abattoirs. Costs could jump from £3 to £100 per animal
Seen yesterday on the icnorthwales site
Andrew Forgrave, Rural Affairs Editor
"NEW EU proposals would drive smaller abattoirs out of business and hit farmers' markets, .....
The legislation, which has already sparked a fierce reaction from the meat industry, would also damage attempts by farmers to climb out of recession, said David Harden, Chairman of the Country Land and Business Association (CLA) in Wales.
He said proposals by Brussels to demand full recovery of meat hygiene inspection charges, and to enforce new blood disposal measures, would result in massive new costs for many slaughterhouses and cutting plants.
The CLA estimates smaller plants could see the cost per animal increase from around £3 to a staggering £100. For large plants it would mean an increase from £2-£3 to £10 per animal.
.....
Already 150 rural organisations, spanning farming, environmental, animal welfare, women's, business and tourism groups, have united in opposition to the EU proposals.
Mr Harden said: "These proposed EU regulations would have disastrous consequences if they are implemented, and so must be stopped.
....
Smaller local abattoirs and cutting plants currently process 49% of UK livestock. They deal with specialist and local meats, provide jobs in rural communities and help cut the distances animals travel.
Their survival is seen as essential if animal diseases like foot-and-mouth are to be contained."
Jan 1 -6 ~ "we have been reluctant to recognise that the switch over has caused something of a rise in prices. We should have been more honest about that".
The head of the European Central Bank conceded that consumers in twelve European countries had seen prices rocket because of the conversion to the euro.
Peter Troy of the North East Business Forum has written about a presentation by Garry Titley, leader of the Labour Party group of MEPs in the European Parliament, about the desirability of our country adopting the euro.
"It will come as no surprise, I hope, that my response to Garry Titley's comments is that I would challenge the detail and conclusions on every thing he mentioned. Perhaps what is more relevant to comment on is what he did not refer to.
.....I believed what the politicians, principally Heath and Wilson told us all. I truly thought that the single market and free trade concept would make this country stronger and that our democracy and sovereignty would not be affected and if it were to be just a little bit eroded it was all in the cause of progress. .....
There was no mention on Friday of the "rubber stamp" workings of the EU Parliament. No mention that all EU legislation can be only proposed by the Commission and the Council of Ministers. The European Parliament being unique amongst any Western Legislative body in that it can not propose its own legislation.
No mention of the economic constraints that Portugal, Germany and the Irish Republic find them selves in because of membership of the euro. All of the three countries Governments are asking for special dispensation because of their individual economic circumstances, no mention of how that is to be resolved. Portugal has got into a right old pickle with the Stability and Growth Pact, enforced by the Commission that is currently costing 380 million euros of Portuguese Taxpayers money to sort out.
........Actually the French and Italian press both have reported an increases of over 26% in prices, directly attributable to the conversion to the euro last January. Their domestic RPIs have shot through the roof. ..." (more)
Jan 1 -6 ~ End of the OTMS scheme?
The National Beef Association has told its members that
the Food Standards Agency is already undertaking a risk analysis on the release of beef from cattle over 30 months old into the food chain.
According to the report in icNewcastle (external link)
"The Treasury is also hopeful that the cost of the scheme, which totals around £400m a year, will be reduced by less animals moving through it........(Keith Redpath) 'should beef from a still to be identified range of over 30 months cattle be given the green light for entry into the food chain we think feeders wishing to specialise in this type of animal would be wise to expect lower prices, even for animals that have only just gone over the 30 months limit, compared with those that are under and do not have to be tested.
"Nobody can be sure that a two-tier market will develop, but if slaughterers are faced with additional costs that are specific to testing, run the risk of incurring other costs if an animal tests positive and have to cultivate new customers after OTM beef has been absent from the food market for over six years there is a possibility it might happen'....."
Jan 1 - 6 ~ "..the most dynamic regions were those which had a prosperous rural economy"
The ( Newcastle) Journal's article about The State of the Countryside report "...Prof Lowe said: "If there is any room for complacency at a national level there is none at a North-East level....an upturn in countryside fortunes was in the interests not just of rural areas but of the whole region.
....
He said that other parts of the UK and Europe showed that the most dynamic regions were those which had a prosperous rural economy."
".... Countryside Agency North East regional director Keith Buchanan said: "Many of the initiatives being recommended in the wake of Sir Donald Curry's post foot-and-mouth inquiry are already central to our thinking in the North-East. Now we must ensure that change happens." Prof Lowe said: "The Government's new commitment to raise the productivity of the lowest performing rural districts is therefore welcome news which needs to be followed through with practical action and investment ...."
Jan 1 - 6 ~"..there has to be a 'reckoning-up' time; there has to be something positive. The Government has got to address the reasons why this tragedy happened."
From an entry (correspondent unknown) for March 2001 in Fields of Fire when it was believed that real lessons would be learned from a holocaust no one could quite believe could possibly be happening in Britain.
The book's author, Jacquita Allender, has with characteristic generosity allowed her book "Fields of Fire" to appear on warmwell. (It can be accessed from the left menu) A labour of love in all senses, Quita's book will stand as a testament of all its hundreds of contributors, those whose faith in vets, in government and in sanity was so heartlessly destroyed in England in 2001. Extract: "... out of all this farming holocaust in our beleaguered county, there has to be a 'reckoning-up' time; there has to be something positive. The Government has got to address the reasons why this tragedy happened. We have got to bombard MAFF, the NFU, the CCC, the MPs with our opinions, and we have got to believe that this time they will be listened to. The issues which I believe need addressing are now part of normal telephone conversation:
- the 412% mark up by the Big 4 supermarkets,
- the differentiation between farmers and dealers,
- the need to think small and local,
- the return of the local abattoir and local meat outlets so that Cumbrians can have the assurity of eating Cumbrian meat,
- why is the illegal meat trade so difficult to police? Why is it such a low priority when the effects are so devastating?
- and uppermost, that the sources of infection of FAM should be eradicated from our country, so that this tragedy will never be repeated."
Never repeated? Professor King gets a knighthood, Roy Anderson is honoured by the Royal Agricultural Society, Margaret Beckett raises a laugh with her parodies on "Mary had a Little Lamb" and - as Dr Watkins so rightly points out in her article written for warmwell at the start of 2003, "For FMD, the veterinary establishment and DEFRA have not agreed that vaccination to live should be the primary response to an outbreak. The advice of the Royal Society and EU inquiries has fallen on deaf ears blocked by the cotton wool of defensive self-justification."
Jan 1-6 ~ ".. he should refuse his knighthood"
Carrying the can - letter in the Telegraph (external link)
Date: 1 January 2003
Sir - The arrogance of this Government takes some believing, shown in its decision in the New Year Honours list to award Professor David King a knighthood (report, Dec 31).
When will it accept that what this Government did during the foot and mouth outbreak of 2001 is nothing to be proud of? It killed 10 million animals, most healthy, and destroyed people's trust in the Government.
Prof King was wrong in the advice he gave the Government and he should refuse his knighthood.
From:
Pat Walker, North Yorkshire Smallholders Society, Thirsk, N Yorks
Jan 1 - 6 - "What has also been clear to me is that there is a real gulf between those who live in our towns and cities and those in the countryside."
(From Prince Charles' tribute to farmers in FWi)
"It is to help bridge that gap, to make people more aware of what is going on in the countryside and of the threat to the people who live and work in it, that I have been doing what I can to draw attention to issues which the farming community faces.
It is said that agriculture is no different from any other industry which has had to go through a process of so-called restructuring.
I happen to believe that this shows a lack of understanding about the role of agriculture.
The fundamental difference is that the countryside is not a factory; it makes up 70% of the land mass in this small island of ours and we depend on farmers to look after it and to produce the very stuff of life - our food.
It is simply not possible to stop farming and hope that by some miracle the landscape will stay tended, the hedges cut and the grass grazed....." (more)
Dec 31 ~ " I would like to know if , in 2003, there is anyone in DEFRA, veterinary science or the establishment in veterinary medicine and organic farming who is enabled to do scientific work on the care and raising of farm animals and who is planning to address the issues I have raised."
" We should never destroy 10 million farm animals again when vaccination against FMD could have prevented the destruction of 90%. Are we to sit and twiddle our thumbs while TB spreads to more and more farms? When will it come to my farm, or the badgers and farms next to my farm? Is killing the only answer to TB? Why should I purge my small flock of Herdwick sheep of scrapie susceptible genotype if there is no scrapie on my farm? Compassion in the form of preventive health measures can ensure the health of farm animals and those who consume them or have contact with them. Either economic farming considerations or prejudice obstruct compassion to farm animals on both non-organic and organic farms. I would like to know if there is anyone in DEFRA, veterinary science or the establishment in veterinary medicine and organic farming who is enabled to do scientific work on the care and raising of farm animals and who is planning to address the issues I have raised in 2003. Is there anyone out there? " Read the new article kindly written for warmwell by Dr Ruth Watkins BSc Hons, MSc, MBBS, MRCP, MRCPath for the start of 2003
Dec 31 ~ A few more bills like this and Britain will not be far removed from the terror states the government so condemns.
Opinion column in the Scotsman (external link) yesterday about the Government's "Terror quarantine plan" "Huge questions are begged by such preparations. Will the cordon forces be armed and, if so, to whom will they be answerable? What facilities will be in place, such as decontamination units and special centres, to treat those involved in an attack? Without widespread public confidence that such measures have been taken, it will be very difficult indeed for the authorities to compel people to stay within the boundaries of a city that has become the victim of attack.
And what assurances will there be against police and official abuse of such draconian powers? A few more bills like this and Britain will not be far removed from the terror states the government so condemns. "
This was our view nearly two years ago when the targeted group was healthy animals and those trying to protect them. Now it is any people anywhere in Britain - and questions about official abuse are finally being asked.
Dec 31 ~ Prof David King is given a Knighthood
Readers will not need to have our feelings about this spelled out. What shall it profit a man if he shall gain a knighthood and lose his integrity? as Saint Mark might have said of some of the key figures during FMD who - it appeared to our jaundiced gaze - were compromising with the truth with one eye on the Honours List. At least Roger Highfield, Science Editor
of the Telegraph (external link) puts it like this - which is much as we would have put it ourselves:
"The Prime Minister's chief scientist, Prof David King, receives a knighthood today despite the controversy over his role in the Government's handling of the foot and mouth crisis.
In March 2001, as the Government insisted it was not facing a crisis in the run-up to the election, Prof King called in epidemiologists who revealed that the epidemic was out of control and he took centre stage in handling the outbreak.
His solution, supported by computer modelling, was the cull of more than 10 million animals which has since been criticised as a "blunt instrument".
We are however extremely pleased to see the name of James Lovelock among those honoured. Here is a modest, brilliant, gently-spoken man with a genuine care for and understanding of the natural world who, at long last, has received some proper recognition.
Dec 31 ~ More New Year awards
More awards:
OBE to:
Alexander Ivan Donaldson. Lately head, Pirbright Laboratory of the Institute for Animal Health. For services to Veterinary Science and International Disease Control. (Guildford, Surrey)
Knights Batchelor to:
Ewen James Hanning Cameron, DL. Chair, Countryside Agency. For services to the Countryside. (Illminster, Somerset)
CB Order of the Bath to:
Geoffrey John Freeman Podger. Chief executive, Food Standards Agency.
(London)
Mrs Anna Walker. Director general, Land Use and Rural Affairs, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. (London)
Dec 31 ~"When millions of cattle were systematically vaccinated with good quality vaccines, FMD disappeared in spite of a large sentinel population in the form of calves and unvaccinated sheep and pigs.
A low number of carriers most likely persisted, but they did not hamper the eradication of the disease.
Vaccination policies and trade regulation must be based on risk assessments taking these factors into consideration..." Extract from
Unapparent foot and mouth disease infection (sub-clinical infections and carriers): implications for control
P. Sutmoller & R. Casas Olascoaga
Rev. sci. tech. Off. int. Epiz., 2002, 21 (3), 519-529
This article in the latest edition of the
OIE Technical Review should be set firmly against the recent strange pronouncements of Roger Morris, Director of Massey University's EpiCentre, who suggests that
vaccination would have led to "about 6,000 farms becoming infected" and
that the "epidemic would probably have lasted five to 10 years..." Words fail us yet again on seeing this in an article in the Massey campus magazine - a view which is so wholly at variance with the advice of the Royal Society and the EU Temporary Committee on FMD. Has Morris written a serious paper supporting this "analysis"?
Dec 31 ~ "DEFRA and the veterinary establishment have failed to recognise that humans are animals too."
"The farm animals must be as remarkably similar on genetic analysis to humans as mice have proven to be. The control of disease by killing farm animals is promoted unashamedly and no apology made for failing to apply methods in human medicine to the care of farm animals ...."
Dr Ruth Watkins, virologist and farmer, has kindly contributed an article entitled: Compassion for the health of farm animals in 2003 for warmwell which looks in some detail at such matters as:
- Vaccination strategies for health
- Vaccination of wild animals against rabies and classical swine fever
- Vaccination against bovine TB
- Using imperfect vaccines - rabies vaccine with specific immunoglobulin
- Badgers, cattle and the reality of a control and elimination programme for TB
- Scrapie, the EU and Britain contrasted
- Organic farming and prevention of disease
- The immorality of not applying preventive remedies
- The expense of pursuing organic recommendations
The article finishes with a challenge
Dec 31 ~ Scrapie: the EU and Britain contrasted
"Even in scrapie elimination, Europe would seem to have a more sensible policy than Britain. This is an infectious disease not amenable to vaccination as there is no immunity elicited in an infected sheep. The virtue of the European plan is that genetic diversity is maintained in scrapie free flocks (those not reporting any disease); the majority. Scrapie is spread only by close contact among sheep and perhaps from the soil they contaminate upon death or lambing with the infectious material believed to be prions. It must be cheaper for government to investigate thoroughly an infected flock than apply genetic testing generally to hundreds of thousands of sheep most of whom are not at risk because they will never be exposed. Focus on eliminating infection where it exists is more elegant than the broad brush measures in the UK. The UK policies seem upside down because where vaccine can be widely and cheaply applied for the purposes of control and elimination of infection it isn't but genetic testing and selective breeding is to be applied across the board, a slow and relatively expensive policy compared to that proposed by the EU. Short tailed sheep, primitive breeds, could be irreparably genetically depleted (such as Herdwicks) in the attempt to select for scrapie-resistant genotype and some breeds rendered extinct (such as the Soay).
In the foreseeable future a test on blood that can sensitively and accurately predict scrapie infection will be available so that flocks can be tested and regardless of genotype be attested scrapie-free. The European policy seems to be the most elegant and the cheapest one whilst awaiting the day when we can test for scrapie infection ante-mortem" See Dr Watkins' article
.
Dec 31 ~ Vaccination of wild animals against rabies and classical swine fever
For FMD the veterinary establishment and DEFRA have not agreed that vaccination to live should be the primary response to an outbreak. The advice of the Royal Society and EU inquiries have fallen on deaf ears blocked by the cotton wool of defensive self-justification. In Germany the success of the vaccination of wild foxes with bait containing live attenuated rabies virus as oral vaccine has proven so successful in eliminating rabies from the fox population that they are now to apply this strategy to classical swine fever. Bait containing live attenuated classical swine fever virus is being put out for wild boar. Within the space of about 3 months they have already 60% vaccine induced immunity in the target population. The plan is to prevent outbreaks of classical swine fever in farm pigs by eliminating the circulation of virus in wild boar on the other side of the fence. But here we are still focussing on killing foxes with poison if rabies were introduced into British foxes hence the experiments on poisoning foxes in Scotland...." See Dr Watkins' article
Dec 31 ~ David Lidington: Nine months on, DEFRA's "Action Plan" on meat imports still not delivered
"New EU rules, coming into force on 1 January 2003, bar travellers from bringing in meat or meat products as part of their personal allowance. But that only highlights the British Government's failure to implement its own Action Plan.
Commenting, Shadow DEFRA Secretary of State David Lidington said;
"Foot and Mouth disease cost Britain £11 billion. Ministers say that the epidemic was caused by illegally imported meat. It's now 15 months since the last case of Foot and Mouth and nine months since DEFRA published its so-called Action Plan. Yet almost nothing has been done actually to strengthen port controls." See Press Release
Dec 30 ~ The livestock industry was still shackled with a 20-day standstill throughout 2002 which has caused major disruption to the farm-to-farm sale of animals, particularly sheep.
See the Newcastle Journal:"....
The measures were designed to combat the spread of foot-and-mouth disease but 15 months on from the last outbreak it is difficult to see the justification for such onerous restrictions to continue...
...Policy makers have often told British farmers that if they can't compete on world prices, they should quit. But farmers would have gladly accepted the world price for grain this year because it would been double what they sold theirs for.
Meanwhile, the price which dairy farmers were getting for their milk - a paltry 9p a pint, compared to an average retail price of 36p - was highlighted by the NFU this autumn.
Negotiations with retailers and processors succeeded in raising the milk price by 1p a pint at the farmgate. It was a welcome move but dairy farmers are still losing money and they're still going out of business.
The collapse in farm incomes which made headlines five years ago hardly raises an eyebrow today. But it has manifested itself in an exodus from the countryside.
In Yorkshire and the North East, in just one year, 3,624 farmers and farm workers lost their jobs.
And this year, for the first time, more farmers than workers are leaving the industry.
It's not tea and sympathy farmers want or need.
They need a government to work with, not against them; they need commitment from the supermarkets to buy British food and they must persuade the caterers -restaurants, pubs and public sector providers - to use British produce wherever possible.
.."
Dec 30 ~ "I think its imperative that folk know that FMD is by no means over...."
writes Elli Logan. "For example, although many features of our way of life seem to be restored, we have not yet on our farm received the monies owing to us in recompense for the crops destroyed and damage done to the farm buildings. This is so that we will go out of farming .... We have been making representation about it for 19 months and are at the stage of having to take legal action which we can ill afford . Needless to say Margaret Beckett and the NFU are aware and are seemingly unconcerned...surprise...
I wish if I may to add to the tributes about Dot BOAG.We encountered DOT when we were campaigning in Cumbria way back in April 2001..."
Dec 30 ~ Why does the Inspector need powers to slaughter?
Janet Hughes must pay £3255 costs for challenging the way Welsh TSE regulations go beyond the provisions of their European counterparts. The Welsh Assembly did not debate the regulations because of lack of time....(Janet pointed out that, in fact, they had had two months to do so.) From Pat Innocent's notes on the case on December 9th " ... (Janet Hughes) was very concerned that if the owner of the animals was away, the regulations allow DEFRA to get a warrant and slaughter them anyway. Since many dwellings were not "only" used as dwelling places, she was concerned that most dwellings would in fact be included in the regulations. This is a frightening situation if the owner is absent, and this provision is not in the EU regulations. Also, the owner is obliged to help the inspector, even to slaughter his own animals.... The regulations say "where the possiblity of infection cannot be ruled out" which is the same as "suspect".
The EU regulations' objective is monitoring animals which go into the food chain, and are made for safety for consumers. There are powers given to inspectors from either DEFRA or the Welsh Assembly to slaughter any TSE susceptible animals on any premises, but the requirements of the EU regulations are for the monitoring of fallen livestock on holdings and as they will be already dead, why does the inspector need powers to slaughter? .... Even the right to appeal is to the DVM, and not to a court. ..." Full account If you share our admiration for Janet's determination to secure at least a legal judgement about this little known and draconian legislation the costs of which have fallen entirely on her own slight shoulders, send cheques payable to Save Our Sheep Appeal Fund. Nationwide Trust Account number reference is: sort code 070093, main - 33333334 account 0863/703 560 350.
Dec 29 ~ "She was a wonderful feisty woman with a great sense of humour"
Dot Boag, who died yesterday, is going to be greatly missed.
We have decided to dedicate a page to Dot. It is hoped that people who knew and loved Dot - that large band - will add to the tributes - and to all the funny stories as well, because it is impossible to think of her without smiling. Who will ever forget her darting out - presumably from behind a large bush - at the startled Prince Charles in July 2001? She had heard he was to do a "walkabout"in Bury St Edmonds and raced there from Ipswich as fast as she could - just as she so often travelled right across the country to bring cheer and laughter to anyone fighting the foot and mouth horror.
She was holding up a sign "Save the Brecon Sheep." Prince Charles stopped to talk sympathetically to her and she gave him some leaflets - including the work on vaccination by Dr Ruth Watkins and the latest Press Release from the Foot and Mouth group.
The page here is all about Dot and includes some of her own words. Please add to it if you can - and read it particularly if you do not yet know why Dot Boag's name will never be forgotten by the many of us who knew her and were made stronger because of her huge warm heart.
Dec 29 ~ "Do you think the French give their armed forces and schools
anything other than French products? Not on your nelly". Prince Charles
In one of those articles whose headline belies its actual contents (PM's adviser scorns 'unrealistic' Prince - Telegraph) we read the Prince's perfectly realistic and well argued support for British Farming and note that the "advisor" is Lord Haskins, who - it is rumoured - has been busily buying up agricultural land in Poland : "......
In his article last week, the Prince - who won the Farmers Weekly
Personality of the Year award - dismissed ministers' fears that a "buy
British" policy would contravene EU competition rules. He has studied the
legal arguments and is convinced that public bodies can buy any food they
wish.
Farmers hailed Prince Charles as a champion of the countryside and said the
Royal Family had shown a greater understanding of rural issues than the
Government. John Daw, who chairs the National Farmers' Union in Devon,
praised the Prince's article.
He said: "Do you think the French give their armed forces and schools
anything other than French products? Not on your nelly.
"It's a matter of interpretation. It's high time we started interpreting the
rules like other EU countries do, which is to look after themselves first
and the EU second The Ministry of Defence said recently that its food supply contract "is required to secure the best value for money for the UK taxpayer". As a result, only two per cent of the lamb it buys is British, along with 16 per cent of the chicken.
....."
Dec 28 ~ Tags unworkable
By Gazette News Desk
PLANS to individually identify every sheep in the national flock have been branded as "totally unworkable" by Cumbria NFU. According to the NFU, the plans to double-tag every animal born or traded across state lines after July 1 with a 14-digit ID number are progressing through the European Parliament with uncharacteristic speed. Urging farmers to lobby their MPs and MEPs to change the proposed legislation, Cumbria NFU chairman Will Cockbain said: "The proposals are bureaucratic in the extreme and totally unworkable".
Comment from the Westmorland Gazette in Cumbria, home of the Herdwick.
Dec 28 ~ "Unstitch those threads and the ancient tapestry - our precious countryside with all it cultural heritage - will lose its traditional character and the beauty which attracts so many."
Prince Charles is Farmers' Weekly Farm Personality of the Year. "It was a landslide victory for the Prince in this year's Farm Personality competition.
He polled over 58% of the votes cast and left all the other candidates trailing in his wake.
Second was NFU Scotland president Jim Walker, third the chief executive of the Countryside Alliance, Richard Burge.
It was a speech Prince Charles gave during the 2002 Royal Show that won the gratitude of many Farmers Weekly readers.
Echoing comments in that speech, Prince Charles said it was "sheer folly" for the UK not to be relatively self-sufficient in food.
"It is something which I think retailers need to consider as a matter of urgency," he said.
"Continuity and accessibility of supply are of the utmost importance to them with the increased risk from terrorism and instability overseas."
The Prince also stressed the importance of the family farming community, which cared for the land from one generation to another.
During foot-and-mouth many people heard for the first time about hefted flocks and the difficulties of re-establishing them.
Farmers were hefted people, said the Prince.
"They are integral threads in the complex tapestry of rural Britain.
"Unstitch those threads and the ancient tapestry - our precious countryside with all it cultural heritage - will lose its traditional character and the beauty which attracts so many."
Readers who voted for Prince Charles said he had put himself out for the agricultural industry...." See article
See also today's (Dec 28) Telegraph
Dec 27 ~ The requirement to record the individual identification
numbers of sheep
in movement documents and holding registers will be a practical nightmare.
"It will be an enormous problem for farmers feeding and finishing sheep from
several different holdings of birth, with a mixture of ID numbers, all of which
will have to be individually checked and recorded when the sheep are brought
onto the holding and before being moved off.
"We have been at lengths to outline our concerns to the Commission,
including hosting a visit for officials so they could see themselves the
potential difficulties - despite this, the Commission appears to have ignored
all the obvious problems. Scotland has led the way in sheep traceability,
through the use of flock identification tags, with all movements recorded on a
central database. This provides full disease traceability without the logistical
difficulties of requiring separate ID numbers to be recorded for every single
sheep. .." (The Buchan Observer)
Dec 26 ~ An EU Food ban - but who will enforce it here?
You cannot have effective rules unless they actually target the wrongdoers. It's all very well for Ross Finnie to "Champion Food Ban" (Today's Times) and try to make political capital out of the draft regulations, preening himself that " Since the foot-and-mouth disease outbreak, the Scottish Executive has been pressing hard for action to be taken on personal meat and meat product imports into the EU community. We took the lead in pressing for these new rules, which will apply across the whole Community."
- but who does he think is going to make it work in the UK? So much seems to be done on the cheap and in a bullying manner missing completely the powerful and the criminal and harrassing ordinary people instead.
Dec 26 ~ "The cynics amongst us might suggest it was simply scientists keeping themselves in jobs by persuading the Government to award lucrative research contracts."
See Scandalous scaremongering brings no
cheer from the Buchan Observer:
"....One of the main beneficiaries, Prof John Collinge of St Mary's, Paddington, keeps suggesting that he will soon clinch the evidence if the Government continue his project injecting massive amounts of BSE prions into the brains of mice.
He is now clutching at straws by claiming a 400 percent increase in "BSE deaths" by
including 588 cases of sporadic CJD recorded since 1990. Why sporadic CJD, which was identified as far back as the 1920's, could be caused by BSE after 1990 but not before, is not clear.
The banning of meat-and-bone meal was probably a sensible precaution. But was it necessary to inflict so much damage on the farming industry by taking older cattle out of the food chain and creating such a fuss that much of the world imposed a ban on the import of British beef - a ban which France has only recently lifted? ..." (more)
Dec 23 ~ Woolhouse said: "We did not have the right vaccines. We still
don't. The vaccines we have now would not control the disease, they're not
good enough."
Such pronouncements by such as Mark Woolhouse carry great weight. Yet the fact is that we do have effective vaccines as all the evidence (in particular Uruguay 2001) shows. We are astonished to read in the Scotsman, the headline: Foot-and-mouth vaccines not up to the job says infectious disease expert
What on earth is going on? Why is Woolhouse so obdurate? Even David Byrne maintains that "emergency vaccination now moves to the forefront of control
measures whereas in the past, it was widely regarded as a last resort" and yet Woolhouse still implies that vaccines are not good enough. Why? And why is it that the actual findings reported today in Nature of the research team are given such a political spin here in the Scotsman article? We remember that Mark Woolhouse, an advisor to the government's chief scientific officer, said to the EFRA Committee last year: "The best advice is that [vaccination] would not help. In controlling FMD, speed is of the essence. In any case, there are only 500,000 doses available, and it would take at least 4 days [for vaccinated animals] to acquire any sort of protection... If we replace slaughter with vaccination we will almost certainly lose control of this epidemic. Culling is simply far quicker and vaccines are not designed to interrupt transmission nor to stop an ongoing epidemic in its tracks."
Even at the time we thought it a very strange statement given what real experts in the field (example) were telling us.
See Vaccination pages of this website which would appear wholly to refute Professor Woolhouse's view.
We look forward to some clarification on this after Christmas.
Dec 23 ~ "The heat from pyres of burning carcasses has died down, but argument about
the management of Britain's worst-ever FMD outbreak has not."
The study done by Matthew Keeling et al is summarised in http://www.nature.com/nsu/021223/021223-1.html and can be read here "Blanket prophylactic vaccination or targeting high-risk farms first are the
best ways to avert or minimize future outbreaks of FMD, say the report's
authors, Matthew Keeling of the University of Warwick, UK, and colleagues.
Similar tactics, they reckon, could work for other animal and even human
diseases, such as influenza and smallpox.......New tests for distinguishing vaccinated animals from infected ones, and
strategies such as those proposed in the new study, show that it's "time for
the rule book to catch up with the science", comments veterinary
immunologist Ian McConnell of the University of Cambridge, UK.......The researchers also used their model to identify a 'predictive' vaccination
strategy to be used in response to an epidemic. This tactic targets the
farms at greatest risk. In the model it shortened the outbreak almost as
much as mass vaccination.
Assuming that the necessary information about farms and animal movements is
at hand before an outbreak, the predictive approach is preferable, says
McConnell. Mass vaccination requires large amounts of vaccine and systems
for delivering it. In most parts of Europe, which suffer only occasional
outbreaks, it doesn't make economic sense. Predictive vaccination is "a
precise strategy", he says......"
Dec 23 ~ "There is no way in the world that these ridiculous EC proposals will work in the UK, where large flocks are often run in remote and harsh areas. It is almost guaranteed that sheep will lose tags."
The Journal "...Farmers yesterday reacted with unrestrained horror to new European Commission proposals on sheep identification, saying they were completely unworkable.
NFU Deputy President Tim Bennett said the Brussels bureaucrats had demonstrated their ignorance of the sheep industry with plans to demand that all sheep in Europe carry not one, but two 14-digit ear tags.
"Not only are sheep ear tags prone to falling out, the 14-digit number will be a record-keeping nightmare," he said.
"To add insult to injury, farmers will be liable for prosecution if the tags fall out." In fact, the proposal is so bureaucratic and impractical that it will be a backward step in respect of the identification and traceability of sheep.
(More)
Dec 23 ~ If the planet survives, Sheepdrove is working out a viable future for farming. I'm in no doubt about that. I just hope that as they succeed, they will be aware of the dangers of being big and powerful.
Hilary Peters' e-diary of real English Food has been updated:
".....I learned later that the two escaped chickens had been taken home by one of the workers, fed and kept safe. This encourages me to hope.
The Kindersleys say in their alpha plus literature: " Nothing gives us so much pleasure as to look out across the countryside we own and know that all the animals and plants, whether wild or domesticated, are SAFE here."
May that always be so.
Dec 23 ~ "The truth is that the UK government and their equivalent MEPs are completely isolated within Europe in their continued denial of events during 2001"
Alan Beat's Smallholder's Newsletter No 64. (Do get on the mailing list if you are not already)
Extract re. last week's EU Report debate: "Perhaps, like us, you feel that party politics should have no place in such matters. Realistically, there has been party bias on all sides of the inquiry, but you might expect this to balance out fairly evenly across the political spectrum. It's interesting therefore to note that the final voting figures given above represent a comprehensive endorsement of the final report by a surprisingly large majority of many disparate groups, all finding common ground on this issue. In fact, the only party to vote alongside Labour MEPs were the French far-right extremists of Jean-Marie le Pen - strange bed-fellows indeed.
The truth is that the UK government and their equivalent MEPs are completely isolated within
Europe in their continued denial of events during 2001. This inquiry has provided the only independent examination of the facts to have taken place; its findings are a damning indictment of the mass slaughter policy and a powerful call for vaccination-to-live to be used at an early stage of any future outbreak. In short, it is a vindication of the stance that we have adopted from the earliest days of the 2001 epidemic."
(More)
Dec 22 ~ " he was too bright not to have realised by September that he might have made a terrible mistake."
Looking again at the Private Eye publication "Not the Foot and Mouth Report" mentioned today in Christopher Booker's Notebook (below), we are struck again by the accuracy of the thumbnail sketches of the "dramatis personae"
Example: "Professor David King Chief Scientist. Intelligent, but as a chemist also out of his depth with the science of an animal disease. He was right in seeing that MAFF was making a complete shambles of running the crisis, and that something dramatic needed to be done. His mistake was to gamble on putting all his faith in Anderson's computer model and not seeking advice from genuine experts on FMD. Although publicly he continued to back mass-slaughter and oppose vaccination, private clues indicated he was too bright not to have realised by September that he might have made a terrible mistake."
This, however, was before his pusillanimous behaviour over the EU Report. How right Magnus Linklater is in his article about King last week. It is hard to excuse those who have so cynically denied that their anguished critics were right all along. Even harder to find any charity in our hearts for those powerful men whose denials are putting in danger all the work that those critics have so tirelessly done to save the country from any repetition of last year's horror.
We see too today (Scotland on Sunday) that Mark Woolhouse, in a team funded to the tune of £500,000 by a grant from the Wellcome Trust, has come up with the somewhat less than world-shattering statement that, "the study pointed to the possibility of using combined culling and vaccination strategies for coping with foot and mouth."
"Last year we did not have suitably effective vaccines, and we still don't," said NFU spokesman James Withers.
It takes your breath away.
Dec 22 ~ MEPs' report blasts handling of crisis - Booker's Notebook
"Readers of The Telegraph may be cheered to see that the excoriating report on the foot and mouth epidemic that was presented to the European Parliament last Tuesday endorses many of the criticisms first aired in this column as the disaster unfolded. This is perhaps hardly surprising, since few people had more technical input into the MEPs' investigation than Dr Richard North, the research director for the Europe of Democracies and Diversities group in the EU Parliament, who was my co-author on the fullest account of the crisis yet published, Not the Foot and Mouth Report, which sold more than 30,000 copies.
The MEPs picked up almost every important failure by the Government, from rejection of the vaccination policy urged by the world's top veterinary experts to the illegality of the pre-emptive cull and the wholesale breach of animal welfare laws. Predictably the one area in which the MEPs pussy-footed was in their criticism of the European Commission for failing to ring alarm bells over the pitifully inadequate contingency plan submitted for Brussels's approval in 1993, which played a major part in ensuring the Government's inability to cope with the epidemic when it came.
Despite the mildness of the MEPs' comments on this crucial failure, it was telling that this was the one passage in their report that provoked anger from David Byrne, the commissioner responsible for foot and mouth, who twice told MEPs that he absolutely rejected any criticism on this point. The Commission must always be right. Considering that the Commission has also just issued its new draft directive on foot and mouth, making clear that any future epidemic will be handled completely by Brussels, its inability to admit it is ever wrong is alarming.
This is particularly worrying since, buried away at the end of the 125-page directive, article 88 gives Brussels blanket powers to order member states to do anything it chooses: including, if it so wishes, a repeat of the contiguous cull that resulted in the unnecessary destruction of milllions of healthy animals, and which the British Government did not have the legal power under the 1981 Animal Health Act to carry out anyway.
Now we understand why ministers were so desperate to bulldoze their new Animal Health Act through Parliament in the last session: to give them these powers before the new directive comes into force. But at least if there is a repeat of the 2001 disaster we shall no longer be able to blame British ministers. Next time their only role will be to obey the orders they are given from above."
Dec 21 ~ How is it that British negotiators in Brussels are not able to spot these absurdities, which could be disastrous to small rural businesses, before they hit the statute book?
From the Country Life editorial on Thursday "... Imagine the response of a provincial French farmer or smallholder to prohibition on composting. But in mainland Europe, of course, the regulations will be less severe. In Britain, by contrast, a whole new cadre of compost police, capable of inspecting every smallholding in the country, will be needed if the law is to be properly enforced. The proposal on composting is typical of the Animals By-Products Regulation, due to come into force on April 30, 2003. This also bans the burying of farm animals which have died of natural causes on farms: all well and good, if only the Government were not also proposing to ban hunts, which at present offer the only economical service to collect and dispose of such fallen stock.
Choicest of all is the regulation that will require all blood from abattoirs to be collected and treated at an approved rendering, composting or biogas plant. Quite apart from the cost, particularly to small abattoirs, of transporting blood to an approved plant, there is as yet no rendering plant in Britain capable of doing the job to the new specifications. How is it that British negotiators in Brussels are not able to spot these absurdities, which could be disastrous to small rural businesses, before they hit the statute book? Perhaps because of the civil-service practice of moving personnel between departments every few years, our representatives never acquire the specialist knowledge possessed by their counterparts elsewhere in Europe. Warmwell.com, we need you more than ever." See also entry for Dec 6
Dec 21 ~ The UK Government stoutly maintained that Uruguay was "different" - and this amendment actually got through in the Final Report of the EU Committee
..but the reason for its difference was merely economic and could easily have been overcome. This comment from someone we must refer to only as an "international expert" : "The differences in the argument about vaccination in the UK and Uruguay is actually different than suggested in this article (Magnus Linklater's article in Thursday'sTimes: A bovine attempt to vaccinate us against the truth), but do favor vaccination in the UK/EU. The reason Uruguay could vaccinate is because their export market is with other countries with FMD (at the time), so the status of FMD free with vaccination is mute. The UK exports mostly to the rest of the EU, which could have easily said (and should have under the EU agreement), "sure we'll take vaccinated livestock". But they didn't. Why not? Who knows.."
Dec 20/21 ~"tell me one insurance company which will touch foot-and-mouth cover with a bargepole?"Jim Walker
"....farmers don't want to give towards a compensation fund for any future livestock disease outbreak, a levy which the Treasury wants after the foot-and-mouth epidemic cost it an estimated £8 billion.
The department of environment, food and rural affairs proposal is bargain basement compensation, for example a flat rate of £300 for cattle regardless of breed, pedigree or market value, of which the farmers' levy would pay £150.
(Jim) Walker told journalists that farmers had learned the lessons of foot-and-mouth. They stuck to the 20 day movement rule, took bio-security precautions and had full traceability for sheep.
He went on: "And what have government done? They now have three sniffer dogs to cover all airports to detect illegal meat instead of one and in the 27 UK airports I have been through in the past year, I have seen three posters warning passengers about illegal meat.
"They say that Customs & Excise is now in charge of illegal meat detection. Customs & Excise tell me they have not the resources. Yet government tell farmers we'll have to pay a compensation fund levy and insure - tell me one insurance company which will touch foot-and-mouth cover with a bargepole?"
Advised that this was an interesting, but elderly, story, Walker said: "It might have been reported before. But many people still don't realise what a disaster it would be for farming. A disease outbreak on DEFRA's terms could wipe out many farmers. Do farmers realise that? Do their bankers realise that? Do they realise that DEFRA has agreed to introduce it within two years?"
The Scottish Executive must not accept such a levy, he said...." (more from the Scotsman article by Fordyce Maxwell)
Dec 20/21 ~ "the main driver behind the Government's proposals appears to be its determination to meet the demands of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) in time for its upcoming Ministerial meeting in September 2003."
Read FARM's critique of 'The Strategy for Sustainable Farming and Food', launched by Mrs Beckett and DEFRA, 12/12/02.
Also read FARM's Resolutions for the coming year: Extract...7 "Don't suffer in silence. Tell your story:
To friends and family. In your local paper. Through farm's website. The public needs to know that the crisis in farming is genuine, the scale of it, and who's behind it. Real stories from real people can't be dismissed as the usual 'whingeing farmers' stereotype...."
Dec 20/21 ~ "I experienced bullying, intimidation and aggression at first hand, and my report went direct to your Committee at Okehampton." Tom Griffith-Jones
This was done both to me and to my Clients. The attack on me by a policeman, orchestrated by Stella Bevan, a senior vet at Exeter, and the subsequent bullying, intimidation and pressurising of my elderly and infirm Clients, the Bensons, as well as the bullying and intimidation of both my Client Rosemary Upton and me at the gate of her farm, again at the behest of Stella Bevan, is evidence enough. These two cases are both serious infringements of our civil liberties, and even if there were not the dozens of other well-documented cases of similar abuse, they show a pattern of behaviour which, from Government officials, is quite unacceptable. The Cumbria Inquiry also flagged up this behaviour, from the evidence which it received, and states "In some instances the approach that the authorities were described as having taken bordered on the totalitarian" (p34).
We have received this note from Mr Griffith-Jones, refuting each point made by the UK Government in its disgraceful briefing note to MEPs last week.
Dec 20 ~ Feakins Judgement - another cause for deep gloom
In the long-awaited judgement in the Feakins v. DEFRA case, the Judge has seen fit to rule that disposal of all the contaminated material to
landfill is lawful.
"Lawful".
This is because, he has ruled, the Animal By-Products orders do not "bind the
Crown"; in other words, the Animal Waste Directive has a derogation when there is a lack of
incineration/rendering capacity due to an epizootic disease (FMD)
We are struggling quite hard to follow his thought process here. Today, at the end of 2002 there is a "lack of
incineration/rendering capacity due to an epizootic disease"? Which disease would that be?
The EU TSE Regulation has a similar derogation, which the
Ministry can also take advantage of; and although the UK TSE Regulation does
not have a derogation, we are told that that doesn't matter because the EU derogation is
directly applicable in the UK and can be relied on by the Ministry. This is gobbledegook and just confirms our deepening gloom about the extinction of common sense in recent legislation.
Permission to appeal was refused. Mr Feakins' courageous stand looks likely to result in very heavy financial loss
on costs.
Where is there justice here? If anyone can see the sense of this we should be happy to print what they have to say. It looks to us as though money and power and political clout is what buys the result in cases where DEFRA or the government feels threatened. It is a disgraceful and iniquitous start to the Christmas season - and if we had not already decided to continue the website, this sort of thing would have strengthened our resolve to carry on.
Dec 20 ~ "Far from
being unworkable, as Professor King and his colleagues have consistently
claimed, vaccination would have enabled Britain to control the outbreak more
quickly without the killing and burning which caused such damage."
"...the steamroller approach
to bad news - you simply flatten it into the ground and roll on as if
nothing had happened. The fact that it comes from a scientist rather than a
politician is rather shocking...." Read Magnus Linklater's article in full "In
future,” itrecommended, "when an outbreak occurs, emergency vaccination,
with the aim of allowing animals to live for normal use, should no longer be
regarded as a last resort for controlling FMD, but must be considered as a
first-choice option from the outset." (more)
Dec 20 ~ Bioterrorism & Emerging Infectious Diseases - A new Low-cost CD-ROM
produced by the American Govt.
We read on the excellent http://www.lovehealth.org site, run by Mike Meredith, that this collection covers January 1995 to July 2002, and is a "A comprehensive collection of the electronic versions of Emerging
Infectious Diseases, a peer-reviewed monthly journal tracking and analyzing
disease trends, published by the
National Center for Infectious Diseases of the Centers for Disease Control.
Accurate and Detailed Information on Bio-terrorism and Serious Virus
and Bacterial infections
More information from - http://www.lovehealth.org/info/index.htm
Dec 20 ~ "The award for the "most brazen performance of the year in the face of hostile evidence"........to Professor David King
The Farmers Weekly article quotes from Magnus Linklater in the Times.
"One might have thought that this conclusion, flying as it does in the face of government policy, would have provoked a vigorous response from Prof King," writes Mr Linklater.
"But no. Pressed to say how Britain would respond if it there was another outbreak, he talked about the importance of restricting animal movements."
Mr Linklater continues: "I find Prof King's obduracy almost impossible to comprehend.
"In Uruguay recently, a full scale foot-and-mouth outbreak was brought under control after all its 10 million cattle had been vaccinated
Why then is that route not open to Britain?...."
Dec 18 ~ "Government still hasn't learned - It is no surprise that the European Parliament inquiry into our Government's handling of the foot-and-mouth crisis has been so critical of the way it was handled."
says comment in the Newcastle Journal (see updated press reports today)
"Firstly, the general contents of the dossier, released yesterday, have already been reported in The Journal.
Secondly, it was obvious to anyone who watched this crisis unfold that there was no effective contingency plan and key decisions and policies were being made "on the run".
It serves little point to, once again, list all the failures.
We all know what they were, Europe knows them and the rural community knows them.
The problem is, Mr Blair's government don't really want to know about their mistakes.
They believe it is time to move on. Put it in the past. Make some general admission like "mistakes were made" - but don't say sorry.
Launch a couple of - behind closed doors - inquiries, make a big play of taking their findings to heart, attempt to rubbish anyone else's opinions and announce that the time has come to draw a line under the matter and look to the future.
Standard spin mode from Downing Street." Read more
Dec 18 ~ "Contingency planning for vaccination was minimal.' This was a major flaw in UK contingency planning and policy implementation, which should have been reviewed by the Commission and appropriate corrective action taken"
Read in full the EU Temporary Committee's final resolution
Extracts:
- 12. The 2001 FMD crisis was a traumatic experience in the areas affected. For the purpose of determining control strategies and methods, the policy of the EU and the Member States must therefore in future take account of the social and psychological impact on the public and effects on non-agricultural sectors of the economy, such as tourism, in the areas affected by a major FMD outbreak. Hitherto the basic 'non-vaccination' policy has assigned undue priority to trade-policy aspects;
-
6.Since only a very small number of cases were actually tested, and relatively few cases were confirmed to have the disease on laboratory testing, it is crucial that the epidemiological data be published and be subject to independent critical analysis, so that lessons about disease spread and control can be learned for the future;
- 20. The UK Government's information policy was inadequate, both before and during the crisis. The content of the contingency plan was not known to the public at the beginning of the outbreak or for some time during it (it was not placed on the website of the Ministry of Agriculture until August 2001). At the beginning of the outbreak the Ulster Farmers' Union did not even know that a contingency plan existed;
-
21. The provision of information from State sources to local bodies and the farmers affected was poor, and advice from the various government departments was repeatedly altered, inconsistent or even contradictory.
- 22. Many of the problems associated with the management of the outbreak arose from bureaucratic and formalistic procedures for obtaining compensation, recurrent delays in decision-making and the implementation of measures by the authorities, particularly in connection with the disposal of animal carcasses, the lack of effective contingency plans, inadequately informed veterinary staff, staff shortages at the locally established disease control units, and violations of animal welfare legislation during culls and in connection with the movement ban. ....... inadequate information policy caused considerable stress among those concerned, many of whom were still suffering psychologically as a result months after the crisis"
- 31. In a number of cases, culling of livestock involved violations of animal welfare legislation because of the pressure of time to which it gave rise. It was reported that unnecessary pain and suffering had been inflicted on animals because of the inexpert performance of staff, some of whom were not adequately trained. This in turn caused much unnecessary suffering on the part of many farmers and their families. Member States should reflect on the necessary training of personnel in advance of an epidemic;
Dec 18 ~ EU FMD Directive
Read in full here. There is some cause for mild satisfaction in the considerable positive progress on the use of emergency vaccination and diagnostics. This is somewhat shadowed however by the apparent continuing authorisation for pre-emptive slaughter on contiguous, "firebreak" or any other premises that a member state chooses. We hope we have misunderstood in a quick reading of the Directive. Alan Beat comments that it "...leaves plenty of scope for killing on a large scale, and acts as an incentive to establish efficient contingency plans based on rapid slaughter. It is clearly based upon UK policy during 2001 yet no independent assessment of the 24/48 hour culling has yet been carried out, as specifically called for by the Royal Society report among many others, while many experts have argued that such culling was, and is, unnecessary.
I also note the contradictions between clear requirements for confirmation of disease before slaughter, by clinical signs or laboratory test (Annexe I) and monitoring of contact premises (Article 19); against the authorisation in other sections for pre-emptive killing i.e. without testing or clinical signs (article 8, 14). Surely "pre-emptive" slaughter is unjustified given the available pen-side rapid diagnostics now available? Why not pre-emptive vaccination instead?"
Some reports in the press.
Dec 18 ~ "Buried deep within the 125-page document, and couched in obscure technical jargon, Article 88 on page 73 allows for measures to be taken on an "ad hoc basis" to deal with foot and mouth, when the virus appears to be spreading despite "measures taken in accordance with (the) directive".
Any such measures would be dictated by a "Decision" produced by a committee of unnamed officials who sit on the Standing Veterinary Committee in Brussels, with no public access and no records kept of meetings. It is not even possible to find out who sits on the committee. " See press release from the United Kingdom Independence Party.
Dec 18 ~ Neil Parish MEP, Conservative Agriculture Spokesman in the European Parliament, said:
"This government is incapable of facing up to its responsibilities.
By voting against this report, Labour MEPs have sent a clear message to all those recovering from the outbreak that it doesn't care and it has no intention of listening. The government has learnt nothing - having taken evidence for a whole year and having travelled the country to hear passionate cries for help, it beggars belief that it can ignore those millions affected by voting against the report.
It just goes to show that Labour is isolated, arrogant and it still doesn't care. This report, supported by Socialists from across the EU, shames the government an d stands as a lasting testimony to its catastrophic handling of the crisis." See full press release
Dec 18 ~
The new EU FMD Directive will be posted up here at noon
The warmwell site will then, soon afterwards,
be removed in its present form, tidied up and revamped offline. It will remain as a resource that can be accessed
via Google etc until the webspace subscription runs out.
It is hoped to re-instate a much slimmed down version of warmwell in the near future.
Dec 17 ~ The Government traumatized farmers, damaged health and the rural environment
and broke animal welfare rules during its handling of last year's foot and
mouth outbreak, according to a report adopted by the European Parliament
today.
See press release from the Green Party.
"Vaccination should replace the disastrous contiguous cull as the response of
first choice in any future outbreak, the report also concludes.
The report was adopted by the European Parliament in Strasbourg today after
almost a year of meetings, sifting evidence and visiting affected rural
communities by members of a specially appointed Temporary Committee into the
outbreak. The committee's Vice-President, Green MEP Caroline Lucas, welcomed
the report.
She told the Strasbourg Parliament: "It is quite clear from the evidence we
received and the communities we visited that much of the blame for the
devastation which followed the outbreak lies at the door of the British
government."
Dr Lucas added: "I'm particularly pleased that the Parliament has rejected
attempts by Labour to water down the report and to re-write history.
"Their efforts to pretend that their were no violations of animal welfare,
no intimidation of farmers, no health or environmental effects from pyres
and burial sites were a cynical attempt to whitewash the past with no basis
in fact." (more)
Dec 17 ~ Excellent News from Strasbourg on the EU FMD Amendments
With the exception of Amendment 11 on Uruguay (not one of the the most important ones), every single one of the Labour amendments were defeated.
Stronger wording was won on animal welfare and on the human trauma caused by the handling of the crisis. Unfortunately, the amendments on carrier animals (making case that risk of transmission has never been demonstrated) were lost, as was access to automated computerised virus laboratories (Dr Ruth Watkins' proposal).
Nevertheless, the overall result is very good - it was passed with 481 votes in favour, and only 32 against - including many UK Labour MEPs who voted against the final report.
We must hope that tomorrow's Commission Directive will reflect the very clear direction from the Parliament that we must pursue vaccination in any future outbreak.
Dec 17 ~"I believe that people would have a lot more respect for the government if it could just bring itself to admit that it got things wrong."
writes the MEP Caroline Lucas in this "intervention"..
" For as long as it doesn't, then there can be no guarantee that - in the event of any other outbreak - the government won't act in the same way again.
I hope this Report will be another step in the process of ensuring that such devastation can never be allowed to happen again - either in the United Kingdom, or anywhere else in the European Union..." Read more
Dec 17 ~ Today's EU FMD deliberations will determine, in advance of the Directive, the final wording of the report on the Foot and Mouth crisis.
We shall publish this as soon as it becomes available. The UK Government is anxious to soften the effect of several of the most critical paragraphs. It is to be hoped that party politics can, for once, be felt to be less important than establishing the truth and looking to the future. We understand that the Today Programme interviewed Dr Caroline Lucas on the subject of the report this morning.
The debate on amendments to the Final FMD report will end at about 1 p.m. As for the claims by the UK Government (below) an emailer, echoing the thoughts of many, writes: "So it seems that all those of us who, last year, witnessed flagrant breaches of bio-security, gross acts of cruelty to animals, threats and intimidation of ordinary human beings, ineptitude and negligence, arrogance and hypocrisy, are all deemed by Gordon Adam to be liars. That the statements, evidence and verbal accounts submitted to the various Government Inquiries were nothing but fiction or delusional ramblings. So hysterical were we all, that we all managed to concoct the same account of the handling of the FMD epidemic in direct contrast to the obvious "truth" of the official Government version of affairs.
I know what I saw, I know what I heard, I know what I wrote and I know what I gave in evidence. So do countless others. We don't need to lie."
We await the outcome of the debate.
Dec 16 ~ Critical report of Foot-and-Mouth crisis to be adopted
Tonight's Ananova report makes no mention of the amendments to be discussed tomorrow before the EU FMD report is finally adopted:
"The Government's handling of the foot-and-mouth crisis traumatised farmers
and broke animal welfare laws, according to a report to be adopted by
Euro-MPs.
A European Parliament committee of inquiry blames officialdom for adding to
farmers' woes with red tape and bureaucratic delays in disposing of
slaughtered animals.
It warned a mass cull on the scale conducted by the Government during the
2001 crisis "will not be publicly acceptable again".
And it said in any future crisis, emergency vaccination must be a first
choice option and not a last resort - something the Government has already
conceded...."
We understand that the UK Government has described as "errors of fact" allegations that there were violations of animal welfare, intimidation of farmers, any illegal killing - or virtually any of the other allegations of disastrous errors made during the crisis. We beg to differ.
Dec 16 ~ Some of the suggested amendments to the EU FMD report by Gordon Adam and Anne Ferreira on behalf of the PSE Group
(amendments suggested in red - Read in full here )- To change paragraph 15. However, contingency plans and the logistical and staffing preparations for an outbreak of FMD or other notifiable exotic animal diseases in the United Kingdom were suffering from considerable shortcomings, according to a report of February 1999 commissioned by the State Veterinary Service (Drummond Report). Hardly anything had been done to implement this report's recommendations for remedying the shortcomings before the crisis arose, because of other high priority work including BSE, even though in July 2000 the head of the State Veterinary Service expressed (deletion) concern about the state of preparations, particularly with regard to slaughter, disposal of animal carcasses, staff training and the availability of up-to-date contingency plans. Ongoing contingency planning, which has already resulted in the publication of a revised plan, particularly addresses these issues;
(We would ask why, with the Drummond Report on their desks, there can be any excuse for the lack of contingency planning)
The "justification" for this amendment - The implied evidence of welfare violations is unsubstantiated, as is the "inadequacy" of the staff involved in slaughtering. A veterinary inspector worked closely with the authorities and animal welfare groups closely monitored all slaughters. All allegations of mistreatment were fully investigated.
(They were not. We have vivid memories of the eye-witness accounts of Helen O'Hare the TVI sickened by the needless cruelty associated with the FMD cull)
- To change para 30 all mass burial sites were subject to monitoring after they were opened. There was no evidence of health or environmental problems arising;
(We remember reading in the Western Morning News 29-11-01,
"Torridge and West Devon MP, John Burnet, tabled a series of questions in Parliament to DEFRA concerning the safety of the Ash Moor Pit. He said ' Studies in the United States and from our own microbiologists confirm the effluent from buried animal carcasses is dangerous to human health'")
- To change para 32 (accidental transmission via staff) there is no evidence that such transmission took place;
(Perhaps there is no evidence - but we remember, for example, the video recording made by North Yorkshire farmer Frank Wrathall and the list of MAFF's hygiene violations noticed in Cumbria at the height of the disease)
Dec 16 ~ " waiting for the perfect vaccine should not be used as an excuse for not using what is currently available, when it comes to controlling any new outbreak of FMD"
UBI has successfully developed a synthetic
Foot-and-Mouth Disease vaccine for swine using its unique UBITh . synthetic peptide
technology. (See press release of Dec 9 2002) "The synthetic vaccine has been designed to confront a broad array of
pandemic FMD viruses from serotype O and can be readily re-designed for potency
against the other six serotypes of FMD virus. The UBI vaccine for FMD virus has
protected over 200 swine from experimental infection during laboratory vaccine trials.
UBI has recently reported on one of these studies in the journal Vaccine. In this.publication, "Effective synthetic peptide vaccine for foot-and-mouth disease in swine" by
CY Wang, TY Chang, AM Walfield, et al. (Vaccine, 2002; 20: 2603-2610)
20 out of 21
peptide-immunized pigs were protected from infection. The vaccine was effective at
small doses in formulations that can be readily manufactured at low cost, comparable to
those of the killed virus vaccines. Field and regional trials have recently been completed
for the UBI FMD vaccine as part of the procedure to receive official registrations by
national regulatory agencies."
We are grateful to Dr James Irvine's Land Care website for news of this breakthrough. Read his editorial about it Extract: "...It should however be remembered that effective FMD vaccines have been available for many years, and especially since 1997. Although they may have some imperfections, waiting for the perfect vaccine should not be used as an excuse for not using what is currently available, when it comes to controlling any new outbreak of FMD."
Dec 16 ~ Gordon Adam still hopes to convince the EU FMD Committee that there is "no doubt at all about the legality of the cull"
Has Mr Adam not yet realised how much of the rationale for the much disliked Animal Health Bill was to make legal the firebreak cull imposed on Cumbria under the guise of a "voluntary" scheme? The letter to farmers in Cumbria who resisted this "voluntary cull" makes it perfectly clear that there was nothing "voluntary" about it: "According to our records you were not willing to give up your sheep. This letter is to advise you what arrangements are now being put in place to include your sheep in the cull."
Roy Hathaway's memo on 6th November 2001 also reveals that the firebreak cull was erroneously known as a "voluntary" cull.
As Lord Whitty said " A pre-emptive cull, by definition, does not require us to be able to prove that an animal had the disease. That is precisely the firebreak or wall strategy that Anderson said should be more clearly available to us in legislation but which is not present in the current legislation." On November 8th, at the EFRA Select Committee, Mr Morley said "At the present time, we do not have powers for a fire break cull."
Margaret Beckett said on November 12th, at the second reading of the Animal Health Bill: "The foot and mouth disease provisions fall into two main categories. First,
there are powers if need be to enter premises on a precautionary basis,
whether for culling, vaccination or testing, to prevent the spread of
disease--without having to prove, as under present legislation, that the
animal has been exposed to disease." Thus, all the DEFRA Ministers admitted that the legal powers for the extra killing had not been in place in 2001.
Dec 16 ~ Gordon Adam says that "vaccination would have made things worse"
In an interview with the Farmers Guardian on Dec 6 the MEP Gordon Adam, who is anxious to "tone down" this week's FMD report from Europe, said, "We could not have vaccinated fast enough to control the disease last year and I cannot believe for a moment vaccination would have helped. In fact it may (sic) have made things worse." The FG report by Alistair Driver says that "he (Mr Adam) also objects to the report's conclusion that "It remains controversial and doubtful whether the 24/48 hour cull strategy was really responsible for curbing the epidemic"...."he (Mr Adam) added, there was no doubt at all about the legality of the cull."
Mr Adam seems to have forgotten that it was the Royal Society itself that said, "Given recent advances in
vaccine science and improved trading regulations,
emergency vaccination should now be considered as
part of the control strategy from the start of any outbreak
of FMD.
By this we mean vaccination-to-live"
The Royal Society's view of vaccination underwent a sea change in the course of its inquiry
and it recommended that emergency vaccination should be not only the preferred tool of first resort but also that "there is a high premium on being able to
diagnose a disease even before clinical signs appear.
Recent developments offer good prospects for a 'pen-side'
test that could be used by veterinarians in the field..."
As for the modelling that led to so much unnecessary killing, the Royal Society's paragraph: "Success in preparing for, and then handling, an outbreak
of any infectious disease depends critically on having the
right data -- eg on the distribution of farms, their sizes and
their livestock holdings -- and using it effectively. Field
epidemiology is essential for the vital detective work of
tracking the spread of infection" was a tacit acknowledgement that the modellers' data was inadequate, adding even more substance to the EU Report's conclusion that it was "controversial and doubtful whether the 24/48 hour cull strategy was really responsible for curbing the epidemic."
Dec 16 ~ 20 day standstill ..."I have argued that Defra should make concessions to try to win back the trust of farmers. The cooperation of farmers is essential ....."
Mary Marshall, an independent and knowledgeable speaker on behalf of smaller livestock farmers at DEFRA stakeholders' meetings, ( The private meetings with the big livestock representatives are held behind closed doors) has sent this message to Alan Beat of www.smallholders.org for inclusion in his weekly newsletter.
"Here is a summary of my proposal, followed by a message from Defra with their own proposal.
Farmers should be allowed a choice between options:
- standstill - time to be determined in consultation, but could be flexible according to species and management systems - for those who are willing (e.g. farms with few movements or which cannot take up other options)
- quarantine/isolation - for those with the facilities. A system of spot checks can work.
- thorough clinical inspections. In a telephone conversation on 1 Aug, David Paton (Pirbright) said that while he agrees that the 20 day standstill would be the most effective policy, he suggested that the culture is not right for these measures. He said that thorough clinical inspection would have the added advantage of controlling all diseases. This would also be a way of getting more vets onto farms.
- use of rapid diagnostic tests, including Pirbright penside and USDA/Tetracore real-time RT-PCR tests. Validation is an on-going process, and it is recognised by many experts that these devices have an important role to play now, even before they have been fully validated (as discussed during a session of the Foreign and Emerging Diseases Committee of the US Animal Health Association meeting in October 2002 in St Louis).
Keith Sumption sent me the following comment (30 July):
".... I have also argued from the start
that there are alternatives to the 20 day rule if we were to introduce
testing as an option - which stakeholders might part pay - there
would be public benefit in building up the capacity for testing and
also building the market place for such tests. The (pen-side)
testing to be used could depend on period since animal
introduction -e.g. virus tests from day 0, antibody tests from day
10, no tests after 21 days (although 14 days is more reasonable for
FMD if incubation period is the criterion)."
In St Louis, Paul Kitching suggested to me that no movement restrictions would be necessary if two conditions are satisfied: movement records accurately kept and individual animal identification........" Read the full message
Mary asks that comments on her proposals should be sent to Alan Beat
Dec 16 ~ Cheap imports of sugar, wheat and milk produce from Italy, France and Spain will be on sale in Warsaw at prices that undercut those paid to Polish farmers.
The Telegraph reports that "struggling farmers in Poland will end up in effect subsidising their better-off opposite numbers in France.".... "More than one-fifth of Poles are dependent on agriculture for their livelihoods, creating a powerful constituency that is at least sceptical of EU membership.
Opinion polls in the candidate countries show that fewer than half of voters in seven of them believe that EU membership is "a good thing", and in four - Estonia, Latvia, Malta and the Czech Republic - fewer than 50 per cent of voters said they would vote yes."
The article begins: "The European Commission is to spend millions of pounds across eastern Europe to persuade doubtful voters to back the EU deal on enlargement reached in Copenhagen on Friday night.
The agreement, which was in doubt until the last minute because of haggling over money, could yet be derailed by the need for referendums on approving European Union membership in the 10 candidate countries." See the article from Saturday's Telegraph by David Wastell in Copenhagen and Askold Krushelnycky in Prague and the relevant opinion column here.
Dec 15 ~ "..you can have as many Inspections as you like and the customer is still being duped"
A farmer writes,"...we do not claim any subsidies such as FABLE and Special Beef Premium and Slaughter premium simply because we cannot be bothered with the extra paper work (which is of course what DEFRA hopes I suppose) Please do not get me wrong as I am quite in favour of accountability as I feel it is LONG overdue that the Customer has a right to know what they are eating but with labelling of foods as it is right now you can have as many Inspections as you like and the customer is still being duped.
I think we have come to the end of our farming span as we are totally worn out and can see no light at the end of the tunnel - especially with Poland now fast becoming the fertile CHEAP zone. We have three farm inspections coming up. First for the Farm Assurance Scheme for OMSCO (milk co-op) - to take at least 2 hours. This entails inspection of DAIRY, COWS HOUSING, ALL ACCOUNTS, VETS ACCOUNTS, FEED ACCOUNTS. Very involved and you must have intimate knowledge of your paper work to be able to answer their questions. Next inspection is by the Soil Association (Licencing Authority for Organic Status of Farm) in March which is ONE WHOLE DAY (last was 7 hours) and guess what? We have to go through the whole procedure again and answer the self same questions. Next inspection is by DEFRA for the Dairy which is not pre-arranged and is spontaneous.
At the push of a pen any one of these can take your licence away but cheats are still out there despite all this over-bearing bureaucracy. Look at the imported food produced to whatever standard on supermarket shelves (not to mention Thai chicken in exchange for armaments).
Do not misunderstand me. I have nothing against inspections but why not just do it all on the same day? To be quite frank we are both so tired and fed up that we do not wish to try to produce food for the British Public any more."
Dec 14 ~"The FSA need to distance itself from Sir John Krebs's personal and idiosyncratic views" Peter Melchett.
Lawrence writes, "More about Sir John Krebs who was the surprise appointment as the chairman of the Food Standards Agency, who was involved in the choice by Government of the Imperial College statisticians who invented and caused the mass cull of 11 million farm animals last year, who promotes GM crops and whose agency has been involved in the closure of so many small abattoirs and small food producers":
From the Soil Association's "Organic Farming" magazine, winter 2002/3 edition
Dear John...
The Soil Association sees no point in further talks with the Food Standards Agency (FSA) on organic food quality issues
According to the Independent on Sunday, Sir John Krebs, chairman of the FSA, has stepped up his attacks on organic farming.
Following a lecture in which he said that manure caused much more pollution than chemical fertilisers, Krebs revealed that his purpose had been to "undermine" the belief that organic farming is more environmentally friendly than non-organic agriculture. This contradicts the views of the government, the RSPB, English Nature and the Environment Agency.
Michael Meacher, the minister for the environment, has written to Sir John Krebs asking him to explain why the FSA has failed to issue a statement endorsing the environmental benefits of organic food. Michael Meacher said: "I am very surprised that Sir John finds it so difficult to come forward with a view on organic farming that so many other prestigious and authoritative voices have endorsed so warmly and forcefully."
"Sir John Krebs continues to ignore the scientific evidence about the benefits of organic food and agriculture" commented Peter Melchett, Soil Association policy director. These benefits were recently published in the government's Action Plan to Develop Organic Food and Farming in England, which states that organic farming is better for wildlife, causes lower pollution from sprays, produces less carbon dioxide - the main global warming gas - and less dangerous wastes, promotes high animal welfare and increases rural employment opportunities.
"The FSA need to distance itself from Sir John Krebs's personal and idiosyncratic views" added Peter Melchett.
"Unless they demonstrate that they are adopting an even-handed rather than political approach to the organic sector, we think a more neutral body should be responsible for commissioning research on the health, food quality or environmental differences between organic and non-organic food and agriculture." Organic Farming Magazine
Dec 14 ~ "it would be unthinkable that such a responsible and influential scientist as Sir John Krebs could be acting not in the public interest, but in the interest of the global agribusiness interests that want to use GMs and patented seeds to "corner" the world food market."
To the extract above, Lawrence adds " Non farmers might be a little confused about the use of "manures" - so I should perhaps explain that the Soil Association imposes strict conditions on the use of manures on Organic Farms. The total amount of manure may not exceed 170kg nitrogen per year per hectare of the agricultural area used. "Where necessary the total stocking density shall be reduced to avoid exceeding this limit."
On horticultural holdings where aerated slurry is applied to the land, there must be at least a year's interval before a harvest is taken. If fresh manure is applied, the interval must be at least 6 months. If manure stacked for 3 months [if from an organic holding] or 6 or 12 months [if not from an organic holding] is applied, the interval must be at least 3 months. If manure composted for 2 months [if from an organic holding] or 3 or 6 months [if not from an organic holding] is applied, the interval must be at least 2 months.
On pasture land, composted manures may only be applied "whilst nutrient uptake is actively taking place" - and there are many more requirements, to protect pollution of watercourses etc.
I keep trying to remind myself that it would be unthinkable that such a responsible and influential scientist as Sir John could be acting not in the public interest, but in the interest of the global agribusiness interests that want to use GMs and patented seeds to "corner" the world food market. Absolutely unthinkable - surely?
Dec 14 ~ Cow Manure in beef, not spotted by inspectors, causes MacDonald's UK to terminate contract with ABP (Anglo Beef Processors).
Cow excreta was found in beef supplied by beef baron Larry Goodman's ABP from their plant in Shrewsbury.
The ABP/McKeys/MacDonalds contract was estimated to be worth in excess of £75 million per year.
The spokesperson at MacDonald's did not mention at what stage of the food production chain this contaminated beef was found. The Sunday Times will be carrying the story.
Dec 14 ~ Scottish anthrax scare unfounded
The Journal reports that anthrax has been ruled out over the cow death reported on Dec 10.
Tests for the killer disease were carried out following the discovery of a beef suckler cow's body on a farm in Lennoxtown, East Dunbartonshire.
But examinations at the Central Veterinary Laboratory in Weybridge, Surrey, found the seven-year-old animal did not die from the deadly bacteria.
Animal health inspectors incinerated the animal, razed the ground it died on, and carried out chemical spraying to disinfect Balcorrach Farm after a local vet initially diagnosed the death as anthrax-related.
A Scottish Executive spokeswoman said: "We don't know what the animal died of but it was most probably natural causes..."
Dec 13 ~ "There was widespread illegality as MAFF in its panic could not respect the relevant criminal, public and private laws.."
Foot and Mouth - the lessons not yet learned, a paper by Professor Bob Lee and Professor David Campbell of Cardiff University speaks of widespread illegal acts by MAFF, including 'horribly cruel'
slaughtering which was a 'lasting national shame'. It dismisses the
government's figures for money required to prevent a recurrence as 'quite
fanciful' and 'blackboard economics': "a policy adopted because it works on
the blackboard but would be an object of ridicule if the costs of actually
implementing it were properly evaluated."
See the icWales report which contains the text of the paper "Foot and Mouth - the lessons not yet learned" The report is critical of some farming practices and very crtitical indeed of the government.
Extract:".... In the end, up to 10 million animals were killed. Perhaps 90% of them were
not infected. The disease was eventually controlled, but only because
contiguous culling had become almost indiscriminate killing in disregard of
the economic, human and animal welfare costs. The direct economic cost is
put at up to £10 billion, but this is a remote indication of the extent of
the disaster.
There was widespread illegality as MAFF in its panic could not respect the
relevant criminal, public and private laws. In particular, it was impossible
to ensure that all the animals were killed humanely.
Very large numbers were criminally killed in ways so horribly cruel that
they should occasion lasting national shame...
...So far, all (the Government) has done to deal with the next outbreak is pass secondary
legislation to give it powers to contiguously cull which it did not have
during the 2001 epidemic, and change the name of MAFF to DEFRA."
Dec 13 ~ Gordon Adam is still trying to dilute the EU FMD Directive by denying any illegality, any cruelty and any lack of effectiveness in the UK FMD policy
British Labour Euro-MPs, with the support of the Socialist Group, have
tabled eight amendments to remove any suggestion that the cull was illegal or ineffective. They want all references to allegations of animal welfare abuses and biosecurity lapses
which allowed the disease to spread removed from the EU FMD Report text when
the report is voted on by the European Parliament in Strasbourg next
Tuesday ( 17th December)
North East Euro-MP Gordon Adam,
Labour's European spokesman on agriculture and rural affairs and a member of
the inquiry team, said: "The contiguous cull of farms surrounding infected
premises was legal, not only in British law but also in European law. Two
court cases confirm this. The Lessons to be Learned Inquiry showed the cull was an essential weapon
in bringing the disease under control. No evidence of disease spread by
improper handling methods was ever proved. No prosecutions were instigated
for animal welfare failures. Labour members want to see these mistakes
corrected."
Mr Adam is wrongly informed. The paper above deals with many of his points about the effectiveness of the policy. As far as legality is concerned, we have shown on this website that the "court cases" to which he refers were travasties of justice because vital evidence, known to DEFRA, was withheld. When the Upton case came to court the evidence about FMD spread was presented to the judge, who found in favour of Rosemary Upton, said that blood testing and close observation were all that was required and awarded costs against MAFF. (And Mrs Upton's animals continued healthy and happy as we all knew they would.) It is both sad and disgraceful that the Labour MEPs and the Socialist Group should not be man enough to admit past mistakes and look to the future. (See icNewcastle report)
Dec 13 ~ The industry cannot survive on words...
See the CLA response to the overnment's Food and Farming Strategy published yesterday. The ClA set out the 10 Commitments that the Government must make in order to secure a sustainable future for the British farming and food industry. "lacks recognition that Government must take the lead in kick-starting recovery, with financial support where required, rather than putting the onus on an already much-weakened industry."
- No detailed commitments on CAP, except to repeat the intention to fund-switch and, implicitly, to cut support.
- No commitment to safety nets, nor recognition that they are needed.
- No clear statement about allowing effective collaborative ventures in the marketplace.
- No reference to biofuels; however, the Chancellor's Pre-Budget Statement contains a proposal for a 20 pence duty cut, which is welcome but not enough.
- Supply Chain Code:
No commitment to enforcement - proposes only trade association involvement in assessing the performance of the code, and continuous review of it.
- Imports:
No commitment beyond what is already being done - particularly worrying in the case of illegal imports, where current action is clearly inadequate.
- Local and regional food:
Commitment to more money for FFB to assist projects (but no mention of how much) and FFB to 'explore' greater use of protected EU food names.
- Red tape:
Regulation to be based on a whole farm approach and with a reduced number of inspections; beyond that, a general wish to use regulation only when it is best to do so. All governments say this, and proceed to increase regulation just as before.
- Animal disease control:
No recognition of the Government's fundamental responsibility; continued discussion of transferring the costs of animal insurance to farmers.
- Rural Development Schemes:
Nothing on making the Rural Enterprise Scheme easier to access.
Dec 13 ~ Supermarkets 'still failing farmers and consumers'
Robert Uhlig's article in today's Telegraph reports that Sir Don Curry himself has said that
"We hear reports that farmers are fearful of reporting breaches of the code by supermarkets because they are scared of jeopardising their contracts. Clearly, after only a year in existence, the code is not working and needs review. Either the terms of the code are not sufficient or the appeals mechanism is inappropriate. It needs changing."
and that a working group would investigate reports of supermarket bullying of farmers in contravention of the code.
The article says that yesterday's Food and Farming Strategy : "...received a mixed response from farmers, rural business groups and environmentalists.
Redirecting support from production subsidies to environmental payments is central to the policies envisaged in the strategy document. It includes new agri-environmental schemes paying farmers to go about their work in a more sustainable way and a commitment to expand existing environmental schemes, with £75 million of new money to fund the changes.
A new Agricultural Development Scheme to improve competitiveness, new farmer/producer co-operatives, farm assurance schemes, money for skills and training, and a network of demonstration farms are envisaged.
The document said ministers would keep a tighter rein on supermarkets' exploitation of their purchasing power, but its only concrete proposal was a twice-yearly review of the code of conduct set by the Office of Fair Trading last year after concerns that Sainsbury, Tesco, Asda and Safeway controlled almost three quarters of grocery sales."...."many of the initiatives would take years to implement, while others suggested yet more working parties needed to be set up to investigate before further policies could be decided. One of the key proposals, a "whole farm" audit that Lord Whitty, the farming minister, said would lead to "something like a farming inspectorate" to cut out red tape, was widely welcomed.....the first stage, to check diffuse pollution, "might be possible with a couple of years". Further rationalisation of what farmers saw as an unnecessarily rigorous regulation burden would take longer and would not engender confidence among farmers desperate for guidance on how to lift themselves out of the doldrums. But the strategy was widely criticised for not going far enough, for failing to return farming to profitability, and for being too leisurely in its response to the crisis."
Dec 12 ~ Food and Farming Strategy.. Margaret Beckett will tell farmers that the future lies with themselves...
Today will see the launch of the Food and Farming Strategy.
Environmental audits of farms "designed to support the new environmental scheme open to all farmers" are to be introduced to check how much pollution individual farmers create and "whether they are meeting new green targets". Other measures include boosting the use of technology, "increasing co-operation among farmers", and making food producers "more aware of consumer needs".
Mrs Beckett will warn that responsibility for the future of farming lies with farmers themselves. Although government can help, the "food chain must act together", she will say.
The strategy will generally endorse the conclusions of the Curry Commission on the future of farming - (N.B. See the independent advisory body Sustainable Development Commission's report on Curry ) - but is unlikely to do much to attempt to curb the power of supermarkets or to integrate agriculture and water policy.
DEFRA maintains that farmers, consumers and environmentalists
want to see radical reform of the CAP, in spite of the deal, agreed between France and Germany at last month's Brussels summit, to delay change. Defra admitted the Franco-German deal , raised concerns that substantial reform was not possible. "Decoupling" ( the removal of the link between subsidies and food production) would encourage farmers to become more market-orientated although they are not happy with the proposals for "dynamic modulation" ( the mechanism for switching support payments from food production to environmental and rural development schemes).
DEFRA's published (pdf) summary of responses to its Consultation on Sustainable Food and Farming: Working Together.
DEFRA Quote of the Day: "We're cutting red tape -- but at the same time we recognise the need for better regulation."
Dec 12 ~" it is time for all of us who care about the quality of
rural life to work together to find a new way forward" Prince Charles
The Prince said: "The past few years have tested rural communities
almost to the limit.
Duchy tenants have been no exception.
Last year's foot and mouth crisis hit hard, following an unprecedented
period of declining commodity prices and food safety scares.
Eight Duchy farmers lost stock and most had to cope with the
uncertainty and loss of income caused by movement restrictions and a
decline in tourism.
It has been a desperately difficult and uncertain time for many people.
I have been struck by the remarkable fortitude and courage that tenants
have shown in the face of such tragedy.
The Duchy will continue to try to support tenants through these
challenging times, helping people to move towards their own solution.
We must look beyond repairing the damage.
"If we are to hand on a viable, living countryside to our children and
grandchildren, it is time for all of us who care about the quality of
rural life to work together to find a new way forward."
The Western Daily News (Robert Jobson) says, "Eighteen months ago the Prince launched his Rural Action initiative as
President of 'Business in the Community.'
This initiative, which aims to build on successful precedents achieved
in Britain's inner cities, challenges businesses to use their skills and
resources to help tackle some of the difficulties facing rural
communities.
Rural Action focuses on attempting to regenerate market towns; new
enterprises in rural areas; affordable new housing; and providing rural
services.
He believes that many farmers and businesses in rural communities are
rising to the challenge of competing in a different market place...."
Dec 12 ~" 67,000 UK farmers have been forced off
the land in the last six years alone - and little wonder when Tesco
makes ten times more profit every hour than the
average UK farmer earns in an entire year."
Press Release from Dr Caroline Lucas. "Dr Lucas' comments come in a discussion paper 'Look to the Local - A
Better Agriculture is Possible' - published
ahead of next week's Copenhagen summit at which EU heads of state will
discuss proposals to reform the CAP ahead
of enlargement."
Dec 12 ~ Countless lambs not included in the half million dead at Great Orton
Nick Green is, like many of us, sickened by memories of the Great Orton killing and also by the upbeat descriptions of "Watchtree Nature Reserve". He writes: "This disused airfield was used to illegally kill more than half a million sheep. But, this does not tell the whole story. The 1.6 to 1.9 lambs per ewe were never counted. I was told by a vet working for MAFF that "It would be mind boggling if we knew how many lambs were killed at Gt Orton. . A "travellator" ran all day transporting the bodies of killed lambs from the slaughter tents to their resting place in the deep recesses of the now infamous Great Orton airfield. Some, we know, had only been born very, very recently. A TVI told me last year "Nick, it would be mind boggling to know how many lambs we had killed....The lambs were never sedated. Imagine
having to hold this little thing whilst our vet has five attempts at killing
this lamb. Imagine seeing 4 broken needles sticking from the chest of this
animal. " and sends this message to register his wish that the real scale and horror of Great Orton should never be forgotten, never repeated.
Dec 11 ~ EU Threat to Abattoirs looms large
Proposals by Brussels to demand full recovery of meat hygiene inspection charges and to enforce new blood disposal measures would result in a "massive and unbearable" leap in costs for many slaughterhouses and cutting plants and would drive smaller abattoirs out of business. (See IC Wales article) David Harden, chairman of the CLA in Wales said such a move would also seriously damage a popular campaign aimed at persuading people to "buy local" as a desperately-needed boost for rebuilding rural prosperity.
It would be "a chain reaction which would destroy jobs and incomes across the meat and livestock industry as well as the wider rural economy and beyond."
The extinction of local abattoirs, he claims, would be a disastrous blow to the CLA's Think Local, Buy Local, Act Local campaign, which has attracted widespread support for its target of encouraging rural-dwellers to buy locally produced and processed foods as a method of breathing new commercial life into recession-hit local enterprises.
"These proposed EU regulations would have disastrous consequences if they are implemented and so must be stopped," he said.
Dec 11 ~ Food Standards Agency prosecutes small abattoir owner for "putting animals at risk"
ICWales article William James was asked by DEFRA to exceed the slaughter limit at his Raglan abattoir in Monmouthshire to cope with the foot-and-mouth slaughter programme. At the height of the FMD crisis MPs even went on record as saying they wished there were more small abattoirs like Mr James's. Local farmers convinced they would have gone out of business if it had not been for the Raglan abattoir. The family firm spent thousands of pounds on hard standing, pressure washers and disinfectant to deal with the extra measures the crisis called for.
When the crisis was over Mr James was successfully prosecuted by the Food Standards Agency whose barrister, Ian Thomas, said the regulations Mr James had breached were important because they were there to ensure that "animals were not put at risk and that hygiene standards were not endangered."
You just couldn't make it up. This is our brave new Britain. It cares for our hygiene standards with all its might. Common sense, logic and justice are not in the running however.
The upshot of the hearing this morning is that following further argument
the Judge has adjourned to give further consideration to his judgment
regarding the interrelationship between the EU TSE Regulation and the UK TSE
Regulation. He hopes to be able to give us a revised judgment before Xmas.
Dec 10 ~ "This is a remarkable story, and the two trees will provide a fine entrance to the Watchtree Nature Reserve."
An oddly upbeat story from the Journal about the planting ceremony of two trees at the Great Orton site - now to be known again as "Watchtree Nature Reserve" after the farm that stood there on the site before it became an airfield.
But, however many articles are written, however many trees are planted, however many ways in which history is rewritten and however many changes of name we see, we shall not forget that "at the Great Orton burial pits, ... from the half a million (481,000) sheep that were sent for slaughter and buried there only 1 farm was definitely identified to have had the disease.
Sheep from 115 farms were tested, 5786 animals in total, between the 7th and 23rd of April 2001.
One farm had a positive test on 9 sheep
One farm had what the DVM for Cumbria, Andrew Hayward, termed "mild" positive with 2 sheep testing positive.
Three farms were inconclusive and the rest, 110 farms had negative test results"
(See the submission to the EU Temporary Committee last June from the National Foot and Mouth Group. )
the case has been recalled for further legal
argument, and that will take place in public at the Royal Courts of Justice at 10.30
(Tuesday). News as soon as possible.
( We note that the Birmingham Post carried an article on the Feakins case yesterday. See also BBC report)
Dec 10 ~ "It was a bit of a shock to find out the cow had died from
anthrax.
The Scotsman reports on the anthrax case in Scotland:
"We phoned our vet who took a blood sample, which is a standard precaution
for a sudden death.
"He phoned me back two hours later to say he had found anthrax spores and
had contacted the government vet," the farmer added.
"We loaded the cow on to a van to be burned and we razed the ground around
where it had fallen. It was not until the next day that we were told to
contact medical authorities to get antibiotics because we had touched it. I
was in very close contact with it...."
Was not the "government vet" rather tardy in telling the farmer to get treatment after his direct handling of the unfortunate cow?
Dec 9/10 ~ FMD in Venezuela
The new outbreak in Venezuela, confirmed last week, is FMD Type A. According to Pro-Med mail,
control measures include:
- - - surveillance and epidemiological alert in Aragua state;
- - immediate notification of this event to the neighbouring states;
- - - notification to the state breeder associations;
- - - quarantine of the affected establishment;
- - - movement restriction of personnel of the affected establishment;
- - - biosecurity measures;
- - - isolation and treatment of sick animals;
- - - ring vaccination.
(It will be noted that no one is suggesting that killing animals is any kind of answer.)
Dec 9 ~ It seems likely that on-farm burial will cease as from next February
This, as even Defra admits, is going to be a really serious problem for all livestock farmers, especially those with sheep flocks.
This new difficulty for farmers, followed in the UK because the EU says so in its Animal By-Products Regulation, has at its heart the belief that fallen stock could be a factor in the spread of TSEs. In France and Germany, collection of fallen stock and its disposal is paid for by the Government in one form or another.
In France there is a tax on the price of meat which pays for the disposal of fallen stock; in Germany it is the local authorities themselves that dispose of the animals who have died on the farm.
The UK authorities are proposing to contract hunt kennels and licensed knacker operators (if there are any left) to collect fallen stock from farms from where they would be taken onwards to rendering plants.
Who pays for this in the UK? The implication is that the cost would be passed on to farmers: "it is for the livestock industry, like other industries, to work out how best to deal with its waste problems and to pay the associated costs".
Dec 9 ~ "we all know what
DEFRA consultation exercises are - a complete sham, the decisions have
already been taken."
Alan Beat sends us this extract from his latest newsletter for smallholders.org: "Regarding composting and pet pigs - don't panic (yet)... I have
also been studying the consultation documents, even though we all know what
DEFRA consultation exercises are - a complete sham, the decisions have
already been taken. The wording seems to be saying that catering waste may
not be composted, and that catering waste includes domestic kitchen
waste. Well, it has long been the case that kitchen waste must not be fed
to pigs. Now, you must not put it on the compost heap either.
That's all. Green waste from the garden, or anywhere else, that has not
been through the kitchen is exempt. So it isn't too onerous. I
have e-mailed DEFRA to check this out and ensure that my interpretation is
correct (I've been wrong before), but on the face of it, just prepare your
vegetables in an outhouse or separate room from the kitchen, away from any
possible contact with meat, and you are in the clear. ... I've attached a summary of the key paragraphs for
you.
Dec 9 ~ Now the farmers are fighting back, and anyone who thought they could intimidate and starve the hill farmers out will face some lively opposition.
Hilary's ediary of real English farm food has been updated.
Extract: " Dec 5 - An inspiring day in the Dales. When I was last here, it was a war zone, with road blocks, piles of carcasses in the fields, and the huge machinery of slaughter roaring through the villages. Now the farmers are fighting back, and anyone who thought they could intimidate and starve the hill farmers out will face some lively opposition. There is a new slaughter house at Bainbridge, run by MCINTYRE MEATS
www.mcintyremeats.com
They actually talk about animal welfare, and cater specially for organic farmers and farmers on the Freedom Food Scheme.
.......
REDMIRE FARM, BUCKDEN, WHARFEDALE. N. YORKS.
www.redmirefarm.co.uk
Since the traumas of Foot and Mouth, which raged all round them and made them feel that their animals, so precious and irreplaceable to them, were worthless to the outside world, Julia Horner has started to sell the Horners' meat direct from the farm. Her boxes of Dalesbred lamb are already popular. They are sold only to customers who come and collect them, so that they can also get 'the farm experience." The Horners are not just selling meat, but a whole way of life which is kind to the land and kind to the animals and preserves an incredibly beautiful landscape.
.......
Dec 9 ~ "The cull wagons arrive and take away the bodies of stock that represent the enterprise and investment of the lives of families for generations"
There can have been few Dales countrymen unaware of what it took the MEPs several months to discover - that "few cases were confirmed to have the disease" and "Mass culling of livestock ....can be ethically justified only by special socioeconomic grounds" and that "violations of animal welfare legislation during culls and in connection with the 'standstill'...... farmers who were affected had been intimidated and pressurised in connection with the culls." See EU Reports
Julia Horner's article, written during the Foot and Mouth crisis and published on warmwell in October 2001, can be read here. She and her husband are in the forefront of those farmers - to generations of whom we owe so much of the most beautiful landscape of Britain - who are now fighting back. ( See Hilary's edairy, above).
Extract: "It has taken hundreds of years to create this wonderful balance and harmony of man and animals, working with nature to create this beautiful landscape. To suddenly take out such a major element as grazing animals from this ecosystem is going to have the most disastrous effect on everything else that is part of it.
The cull wagons arrive and take away the bodies of stock that represent the enterprise and investment of the lives of families for generations. Flocks hefted to hillsides as hardy as the native thymes and sedges that cling to the same hills. These flocks have evolved here and are irreplaceable...."
Dec 9 ~ For the best articles in the Sunday Papers
Dec 7 ~ RASE Awards for science and hard work.. ....
Can you guess who this is? The Royal Agricultural Society of England have awarded
......... for leadership in the farm animal veterinary sector. He received the Bledisloe Veterinary Medal as one of the most active and important vets in the campaigns on BSE, TB and FMD. His colleagues praised his leadership and courage during the FMD outbreak.
Guess who was awarded an honorary fellowship.....
If you are in any doubt, go to
http://www.rase.org.uk/communications/rev2002/awards.html
But only if you are feeling calm and brave.
Dec 6 ~" there might have been rather more useful ways to spend all that taxpayers' money."
Private Eye's Muckspreader shares the current scepticism about the motives for all the scaremongering over CJD. His article concludes: "....This might be jolly healthy for Prof.Stan's bank account. But the fact remained that even 588 was still a little way short of those hundreds of thousands of deaths confidently predicted by the scientists only six years ago. And now comes the most alarming news of all: that vCJD cases are actually in sharp decline, just when, if the scientists' long-promised BSE-related epidemic was ever to materialise, they should be hurtling upwards. In other words, there might have been rather more useful ways to spend all that taxpayers' money."
Comment letters on the muckspreader article (for possible publication) can be sent to strobes@private-eye.co.uk
Dec 6 ~ Thou shalt not compost for thy pet pig..Statutory Instrument on Catering Waste..a load of old digestion residue?
The proposed
Statutory Instrument on the PROPOSED USE OF CATERING WASTE CONTAINING MEAT
IN COMPOSTING AND BIOGAS TREATMENT can now be read, in all its Old Testament severity, on this website. A consultation letter was issued on 20 November 2002 and
comments have to be received by February 10th 2003. There are 12 commandments (... 'There shall be a
clean area and an unclean area...')
The most extraordinary parts of the document are those that deal with the
householder...
There is a question and answer section -
-
17. I'm not a farmer, I just have a pet pig. Can I compost?
- NO. Pet animals are just as susceptible to diseases as farmed animals, and
must not be allowed access to catering waste. If you keep a pet pig or any
pet ruminant you must not compost on the premises. This does not prevent you
from sending your kitchen waste for composting on an approved site
elsewhere. If you keep poultry and you wish to compost at home, you must do
so in an enclosed container.
Farmyard manure is referred to delicately as
digestion residue. Thus,
'No person shall ... allow any livestock, other than wild birds [WHAT ABOUT
WILD MAMMALS I WONDER) to have access to any land onto which, within the
period of two months immediately preceding the access, he or any other
person has applied or otherwise deposited any (1) compost; or (2) digestion
residue.
One can see the logic of it all, but certainly the sections involving the
householder are clearly unenforceable and yet again inevitably bring the law
into disrepute.
This is all
part of the dreaded Animal By-Products Regulation (amended) which becomes
law on 30 April 2003. This Regulation includes the Fallen Livestock measure
(banning on-farm burial of dead animals) and also the requirement that all
blood from all abattoirs should be incinerated at high temperature under
pressure (we do not have the industrial plant capable of doing this in the
UK at present).
It is to be hoped that all relevant organisations and all smallholders respond. Here is the excellent response of the Composting Association.
A list of the DEFRA consultees may be seen here.
Dec 6 ~ "terrifying a population to keep interest going in a rare disease".
" There is, of course, money to be lost and reputations to be damaged if the bottom drops out of the prion creed."
From Magnus Linklater's article in Thursday's Times about the Prusiner conjecture that muscle and flesh of cattle and sheep may harbour deadly levels of prions that cause variant CJD
Magnus Linklater writes: "...... A damning article in the British Medical Journal, written by George Venters, a consultant in public health medicine at the Lothian Health Board, argued that the disease was neither new nor caused by prions. Headlined "New variant CJD: the epidemic that never was", it drew a furious response from prion supporters. But nothing has caused Venters to change his mind.
There is, of course, money to be lost and reputations to be damaged if the bottom drops out of the prion creed. Now, however, the whole issue is about to become political. Later this month Margaret Beckett, the Environment Secretary, will be asked to approve a new research grant for Professor Alan Ebringer of King's College London, a distinguished scientist who has identified a microbe which he believes was responsible for BSE and which may also hold the clue to multiple sclerosis. His thesis is radical, like all the best scientific advances, but at least it is statistically consistent. So far it has been opposed by Seac, the government committee which approves research projects. That is hardly surprising: six out of the 12 Seac members are involved in prion research.
The time has come, therefore, to explore the alternatives. Mrs Beckett should have the courage to challenge the Prusiner orthodoxy and break new ground. Anything must be better, surely, than what Venters calls "terrifying a population to keep interest going in a rare disease".
Dec 6 ~ The prion theory has been widely accepted particularly by SEAC, the body closely allied to the Food Standards Agency and which shares a secretariat with DEFRA
which has been instrumental in depriving Prof Ebringer's team of further research funding.
The minutes of the meeting in February this year, at which Prof Ebringer was allowed precisely 25 minutes to present his work, do not, according to Prof Ebringer "correspond to what I had said at the meeting or correspond to the discussion after my presentation." Our layman's very simplified understanding of the situation:
warmwell article on Professor Ebringer. (See also the warmwell vCJD...BSE....scrapie page)
Dec 6 ~ No prosecutions to be brought against Northern Ireland smugglers of FMD infected sheep
See Belfast Telegraph: "Northern Ireland could suffer a repeat of the foot and mouth crisis which hit the province almost two years ago, it was warned today.
South Antrim MP David Burnside said he was surprised no-one had yet been convicted for the part they had played in smuggling into Northern Ireland infected animals which had caused the outbreak.
Mr Burnside was responding to a letter he had received from Rural Affairs Secretary Margaret Beckett on the matter.
In her letter, Mrs Beckett revealed a number of files had been sent to the Director of Public Prosecutions, who had concluded the prosecutions should not proceed."
We recall the continuing problems of sheep smuggling in Northern Ireland reported in March this year. Why this reluctance to prosecute?
Dec 6 ~ Systems should rely more on self-regulation and less on formal policing by enforcement agencies, says Lords' report
Of more than 50 items of forthcoming environmental legislation at various stages in the pipeline, two fifths will impact on farm activity in one way or another. The House of Lords Environmental Regulation and Agriculture report says good farm practice must be promoted to reduce undesirable environmental impacts as well as to deliver environmental benefits - but new approaches are needed.
The committee recommends:
- A risk-based approach which relies more on self regulation and less on formal regulation by enforcement agencies.
- A true partnership between regulators and the regulated to ensure that workable and effective environmental rules with known cost implications are developed, well in advance of starting dates.
- The new approach should be built around whole farm planning and environmental management systems.
- The Government should support the transition to new regulatory regimes with co-ordinated advice, training, IT systems and infrastructure provision.
- Unnecessary barriers to information exchange (such as the Environment Agency's inability to access data) must be removed.
The report says that systems should rely more on self-regulation and less on formal policing by enforcement agencies
and that there are also major impacts, not all of them fully quantified, from EU Directives in particular the Waste Framework, Nitrates, Water Framework and Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control Directives. The chairman of the Lords European Union Environment Committee, the Earl of Selborne, said: "Farmers are inundated with regulations and advice from many different sources.
The burden of paperwork threatens to overwhelm smaller businesses. Government and its agencies need to work more closely together to help farmers meet environmental goals. The key to this is a 'whole-farm approach'."
Lord Selborne said the committee welcomed the fact the DEFRA had set up a Farm Focus Division but it needed more money and should have a presence in all regions. We were particularly disappointed to hear it would take 10 years to achieve proper integration of data systems. This is unacceptable," added Lord Selborne.
.
See FWI report and the Newcastle Journal report
Dec 5 ~ "the government had awarded a contract worth £32m to the PowderJect company to supply 20m doses of smallpox vaccine in case of a terrorist attack. The problem was that Paul Drayson, the firm's owner, had given two £50,000 donations to the Labour party.
Dr Drayson and a succession of ministers said it was monstrous to suggest a link and the story curled up and died" This extract is from an article at the time of the Powerject affair (August this year) by John Humphrys in the Sunday Times.
Dec 5 ~ FMD scare in Scotland was, as expected, a false alarm.
See Journal report. The couple at the centre of the foot-and-mouth disease scare later described the experience as "every farmer's worst nightmare".
In a joint statement, Alistair Ingram and his wife Diane said: "The news of a final negative result comes with great relief, not only for ourselves here at Bogton, but also all our neighbours and farming families the length and breadth of Britain..."
The Rapid Diagnosis test, developed and tested informally in Britain at the start of the Foot and Mouth outbreak but ignored by the authorities, would have brought relief to all on the very day of the suspected case.
Dec 5 ~".. we note with concern the Bill's reduction of the necessary safeguards for householders and businesses facing speculative proposals for compulsory purchase orders by local authorities"
The CLA press release about the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Bill is very important. Although the Bill heralds positive change by introducing a new "Loss Payment" for victims of compulsory purchase, it contains a sting in the tail for property rights.
"The Bill proposes the removal of significant checks and balances, by allowing an authority to buy land anywhere if it thinks that the acquisition "will facilitate the carrying out of development, redevelopment or improvement on or in relation to the land". This is a reduction of the protection that Statute affords people's rights in a property-owning democracy. We will be seeking changes in the Bill."
Dec 5 ~ 'Make this a farmers' market Christmas'
Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall and Clarissa Dickson Wright
are backing the National Association of Farmers' markets' (NAFM) campaign to get people to buy their Christmas fare at their local farmers' market - direct from the producer. (See NAFM Press release)
And, to inspire people and show them the kinds of produce they can get at these markets the stars of the River Cottage and Clarissa and The Countryman television series have produced a series of seasonal recipes available to download from the National Association of Farmers' Market website www.farmersmarkets.net
Dec 4 ~ NESTLÉ yesterday cancelled more than 200 milk contracts with dairy farmers in Cumbria and South West Scotland.
Cumbria Online reports today in its article CAPPUCCINO IN, FARMERS OUT AS NESTLI CANCELS CONTRACTS
: "....Instead of buying its milk directly from farmers the company will deal through the co-operative First Milk.
The National Farmers' Union sees this as a "devastating blow" for the 211 farmers affected in Cumbria and South West Scotland, who may get less for their milk when contracts are renegotiated in April.
Nick Utting, NFU group secretary for North Cumbria, said: "Farmers are struggling as it is to maintain their income with extremely low milk prices.
"Now there is a danger that, come next spring, the milk price is going to be forced down further.
"Farmers who suffered from foot and mouth last year have restocked, only to find that their milk buyer isn't going to be there. This has come as a great shock."
Nestlé announced the changes yesterday when letters were delivered to farmers, some by taxi.
The firm began consultations in July about scrapping contracts with up to 70 farmers who supply Dalston.
But the decision to stop buying direct altogether has taken farmers by surprise. ..."
Dec 4 ~ Foreign policy is now a branch of showbiz
Thank Heaven for Simon Jenkins today whose article in the Times ( "Poisoned by terror made and sold in Whitehall") tells the spinners that we do not buy any of it.
"Both the smallpox alert and Saddam's jail horrors could, of course, have been public service notices long planned by the Central Office of Infomation. Such is the cynicism bred of experience that nobody believed it. This is the third weekend in a month that a terrorism threat has emanated from Whitehall. Terror stories are always the easiest for government to sell. Headlines write themselves and the pictures always "burn or bleed". Yesterday they came with string accompaniment. Jack Straw's Saddam-is-awful video showed Iraqis yet again having their heads kicked in, this time to background music. Foreign policy is now a branch of showbiz....
...Downing Street seems no longer able to assess risk. The chance of Britain being engulfed by a smallpox epidemic must be infinitessimal. ....as a free citizen I resent the Government trying to terrify me, week after week, to dominate the news agenda. I am not afraid of Saddam Hussein. I do fear the next leak, wink and nudge from the terrormongers of Whitehall."
The cartoonist Steve Bell says it all. All this is much too serious to be laughed at as a Whitehall farce - but that is what it is.
Dec 3/4 ~ No procedures prepared [let alone tested] to cope with accidents in UK bio-research labs.
Lawrence writes about the "shock, horror" story that Iraqui scientists might be learning how to invent biological warfare agents in British Research Labs. "But," he says,"the programme itself (File on Four) dealt with standards of containment in research laboratories. It mentioned the escape of smallpox from a lab in Birmingham - [infection was transmitted to persons outside the containment lab. through the airconditioning system...] - and Health and Safety reports on a lab. in Imperial College, London. The Imperial College lab. had been experimenting with some horrendous incurable disease of humans - with potential for 'biowarfare' - presumably. The HSE found that the lab. had no procedures prepared [let alone tested] to cope with accidents. In the event of an 'escape' inside the lab. operatives would have had to improvise - to enter the lab and hold their breath while cleaning up... Sterilising equipment [presumably an autoclave] wasn't available in the lab. Infected material and equipment needing to be sterilised had to be carried through an office before it could be sterilised... All this involving pathogens dangerous to humans.
I couldn't help speculating that if dangerous human pathogens are treated so carelessly in a high profile University lab., the standards applied when the disease involved [like Foot and Mouth] is not dangerous to humans are likely to be even leakier......who inspects animal disease research labs?"
Lawrence's letter is, as always, well worth reading in full. The danger that an outbreak of major disease will in fact emanate from one of our own research labs looks horribly real. (We note that the Times today says "Ministers ruled out mass immunisation against smallpox yesterday but put Britain on heightened alert over bioterrorism by preparing to vaccinate up to 500 key medical and military personnel....")
Dec 3 ~ vCJD actually in decline - CJD "screening could wreck victims' lives without offering any hope of treatment"
Confusion continues over the scale of potential vCJD and its alleged link to BSE infected meat.
The
Telegraph today under the headline
Cases of vCJD in decline
by Roger Highfield, Science Editor:
"The human form of BSE seems to be in decline, according to figures released yesterday by the Department of Health.
There have been 15 cases of variant CJD so far this year compared with 20 last year and 28 in 2000. To date, 119 people have died from definite or probable vCJD.
Last week's claim that eating BSE-contaminated meat may have led to other forms of CJD remains controversial and a recent study by Prof Christl Donnelly, of Imperial College, London, showed up to four million cattle infected not one million as earlier thought.
Prof James Ironside, director of the CJD surveillance unit in Edinburgh, backed calls for widespread screening for the disease.
One proposal discussed by Prof Ironside with the Public Health Laboratory Service was to check for the disease in the 80,000 tonsils removed each year.
But Frances Hall, secretary of the Human BSE Foundation, whose son died of vCJD in 1996, said screening could wreck victims' lives without offering any hope of treatment."
Pat too has been wondering why the sudden publicising of the so-called scale of vCJD is now such hot news. He writes: "Cracked it. If the nvCJD numbers keep going down at this rate (nearly
halved in 2 years) all these idle overpaid Government Scientists are going
to be out of a job. Got to keep the gravy train going at all costs. "
Dec 3 ~ The European Union and the US are seeking gains for their highly competitive service sector firms in the next round of global trade talks in return for concessions they may have to make on cutting agricultural subsidies.
Without any public or parliamentary debate, health services, private education, rail maintenance, environmental (sewage and sanitation), retail, financial and banking services have already been partially or wholly signed up to GATS.
Sectors currently being targeted in GATS negotiations for further opening to the free market include: postal services, broadcasting and communications, care homes, health care and education. For details please see the other daily warmwell news page
Dec 3 ~ Many farmers unable to conduct business because of the rule would be prepared to abide by the standstill if it was shortened to six days - NBA chief executive Robert Forster.
The FWi site article says:
"Better control of disease spread could be achieved by twinning a shorter standstill with the much greater use of on-farm isolation instead......
The government would never appreciate how widely the standstill was ignored if it continued to insist there was no evidence of widespread rule-breaking.
"We do not want farmers to break the law but we are sure that many of them have discovered undetectable methods of moving animals illegally."
As a result, the State Veterinary Service could not be sure that it knows where every animal in the country is, or where it came from, ...."
Dec 3 ~ Morley steps up his pig tagging campaign
The news from the National Pig Association site says,
"Animal health minister Elliot Morley is pressing ahead with controversial plans to introduce compulsory holding-of-birth tagging of pigs not going direct to slaughter.
This will involve the mutilation of around 115,000 young pigs a week and producers say it will impose a pointless and unsustainable burden on the industry.
NPA says it's as interested as Morley in securing the health status of the national herd but compulsory tagging will bring little benefit whilst causing major economic damage to the industry and jeopardising animal welfare. It vigorously opposes his plans.
Morley called for an immediate review of pig identification and movement rules (PRIMO) this summer following a foot and mouth scare involving a load of sows at Selby market.
He wants his new rules to be in place by summer next year. Pig producers fear he is using the Selby incident as an excuse to pursue a personal crusade to have all pigs identified, whether this brings any benefit or not.
It is a source of annoyance to the pig industry that one load of cull stock collected via Selby market is now driving changes that will impact adversely on the whole UK pig population.
Elliot Morley has never satisfactorily explained what Defra's investigations into the Selby incident revealed. ..."
See also "Angry sow demonstrates the difficulties of tagging"
Dec 2/3 ~ The Prusiner research was actually published online as early as October 21.
See our report this morning and the extract of the actual research published in October. One is led to wonder why the broadsheets and the BBC chose this weekend to publicise Prof Prusiner's conjecture that muscle and flesh of cattle and sheep may harbour deadly levels of prions that cause variant CJD. As an emailer wrote today: "On the Today programme on BBC this morning a Professor (didn't catch name)
has recommended that the whole country be tested for CJD. Yes the whole
country. Now the catch is they haven't actually got a test yet and they
haven't actually got a cure, but the Drug Companies are working on it..
Professor Ironside of the CJD Surveillance Unit (the one that has been in
existence since the early 1900's and has achieved nothing (nearly a rude
word cropped up here) says again "There could be millions of sufferers out
there".
Bearing in mind that this disease has killed 120 people OVER NEARLY NINE
YEARS.. and the parlous state of the NHS - something seems a bit odd.
Perhaps I am missing something here.
Now is this just the usual bad time for the Government when it becomes
necessary to toss something into the media to distract or is it Funding Time
for the CJD Lot?"
The CJD surveillance unit is funded directly by the Department of Health and the Scottish Home and Health Department.
Dec 2 ~ "No wonder the authorities are keen for illegal meat to continue claiming the undiverted attention of the media."
The editorial of the smallholders.org newsletter this week by Alan Beat:"... openness and honesty have not been particularly strong points on the part of the UK authorities during both the CSF and FMD epidemics. We all know that manipulation, deceit and cover-up have been the order of the day. Now ask yourself, why has so little action been taken against illegal meat imports, when these are claimed to have been the source of the 2001 crisis? It would have been so easy to make a few token gestures to take the pressure off this issue. No government could survive a second disastrous introduction of FMD through inaction - it would be political suicide.
The fact that virtually no action has been taken is telling us clearly that the government knows perfectly well this was not, and is not, a serious threat at all - and that it suits very nicely for the media spotlight to remain where it is, rather than searching elsewhere.....The secretions of an infected animal contain trillions of infective virions, while dead meat contains literally none at all because changes in pH kill the virus within hours. Only bone marrow, lymph glands and outer skin surfaces may harbour live virus for more than a few hours, and that too decreases with time unless very specific conditions are met.
No ham in a rambler's sandwich, cooked or uncooked, can possibly contain live FMD virus by any stretch of the imagination.
.... Royal Society inquiry report lists a number of new animal diseases that have entered this country for the first time within recent years. All but one have become endemic. All, without exception, were brought in by the movement of live animals or their live products. Why are we expected to believe that CSF or FMD should be any different?
Read editorial.
Dec 2 ~ MP David Maclean ( Penrith and the Border) says, "Why punish our farmers further?"
This is the Lake District
"..... In a motion tabled for the House of Commons, Mr David Maclean is calling upon the Government "to examine the exemption process with a view to a more flexible and less bureaucratic regime which provides greater support for English and Welsh farmers who otherwise will be obliged either to break the law or face commercial ruin".
Explaining the motion, Mr Maclean said: "The Government desperately needs to reconsider this rule for the livelihood of our farmers and agricultural community. Cumbria has suffered enough at the hands of the foot-and-mouth crisis and needs all the help it can get from the Government.
"This rule can be more flexible, as seen in Scotland, so why punish our farmers further? Many constituents have written to me on this issue and it needs to be addressed by the bureaucratic officials at DEFRA."
Dec 2 ~ Before all interest in the 2001 FMD fiasco dies away completely let us not forget (and many will never be able to forget) one crucial point:
Up to 95% of pre-emptively culled farms were slaughtered unnecessarily. Because of administrative delays the slaughter took place on the day or days after clinical signs would have been apparent if exposure had occurred. These animals would have been showing clinical signs if really infected. And they were not.
The government's mantra "had those cattle not been slaughtered, not only is it highly probable that many of them would have developed the disease , but also it would have led to a further spread of the disease in those premises that were contiguous to the initial contiguous cull...." (e.g. Lord Whitty, House of Lords March 25) demonstrates an ignorance about the spread of the virus strain that the judge in the Maff v.Upton case was able to scotch, once directed to the relevant science - in spite of all Maff's attempts to call the scientific evidence a red herring. Both Page Street and local DEFRA officials seemed to regard the virus rather as those in
former days regarded witchcraft: it had to be brutally eradicated and anyone resisting must necessarily be an enemy. Those whose common sense and humanity urged them to resist will never be the same again - and never again feel the same way about England. No appeal to science was of any use until the Maff versus Upton case. And even now no one involved in enforcing the senseless carnage will accept responsibility or make any apology.
Dec 2 ~ A frightening legacy remains
Perhaps those responsible for the Foot and Mouth nightmare are going to get off scot free since the only sin in today's UK is political incorrectness and the only unpardonable error admitting to a mistake. Millions of animals were needlessly killed, billions of pounds were lost through ignorance and arrogance, countless farmers were terrorised and many left shaken beyond recovery while at the same time seeing the farming community vilified in the press - and justice has not been done.
However, the most alarming aspect of all this for the future is that the government department responsible - whatever its present name - has lost all credibility and still will not face up to the facts. Many farmers are simply not going to comply with regulations unless they can see some common sense in them. Out of laziness, arrogance or incompetence, the same old untruths are accepted in government circles, the same unrepentant modellers conduct the research, the same SVS winks at animal welfare violations by big businesses unrestrained by the RCVS or the RSPCA, and the same faceless bureaucrats are directing "independent" risk assessment. For the safety of the human population who may at any time be at the mercy of far more terrible diseases than Foot and Mouth, this is a grave worry.
Dec 2 ~ if they knew about the crisis in dairy farming, quite a small number of housewives putting a card in the box of their local supermarket saying they would pay more for local milk could change supermarket policy.
Hilary's English food e-diary has been updated. "Dot feels that housewives are used by big business as the excuse for their rapacity, but they are never consulted. Perhaps, if they were consulted, their views could change the face of British farming.
Nov 30 ~ Initial tests on bullock are negative (as expected).
Tests are to continue for 96 hours
Nov 29 ~ FMD symptoms in Scotland
The BBC says, " A farm in the north east of Scotland has been cordoned off after an animal was found with foot-and-mouth symptoms.
A seven-month-old bullock on the farm in Huntly, Aberdeenshire, has mouth lesions.
As a precaution, movement restrictions have been placed on the farm and all others within an 8km (five miles) radius.
Samples from the animal have been sent to the international reference laboratory at the Institute of Animal Health in Pirbright, Surrey. Initial results will not be available until Saturday morning. ." The BBC then says "Up to 10 million animals were destroyed during the foot-and-mouth crisis." and adds, " Opinion is divided among experts as to whether or not animals should be vaccinated against foot-and-mouth to prevent a further widespread outbreak."
We would take issue with this. Experts in FMD were saying in February 2001 and continue to say loud and clear that vaccination should be the first tool considered in our fight against this disease. Opinion to the contrary is political. If the USA are now fully geared up to use rapid diagnosis kits (and they are ) why must it take the UK until tomorrow for this bullock's symptoms to be diagnosed in the laboratory and a further three days for confirmation?
Nov 29 ~ Manchester Conference "interesting and highly charged"
On Wednesday 27th November, Manchester Art Gallery held a conference to discuss the proposal to organise a 'Cultural Documents of FMD' national exhibition project, including a publication, and a supporting urban/rural public discussion programme about FMD, to tour the main urban centres during 2003/4.
We hear that "the meeting was very interesting and highly charged as you can imagine.
David Black gave an excellent and evocative account of the Cumbrian experience from a vet's viewpoint.
Christopher Chapman read out his eye-witness account of the elimination of an entire herd at a farm at Ramscliffe in Devon complete with his photographs - which was very moving.
Professor Ian Mercer CBE, gave an entertaining talk on the enquiry held in Devon. and David Rackstraw ( Legal Dept of Cumbran County Council) produced the new Report from Cumbria just hot off the press which makes very interesting reading." We hope to publish the agenda later on.
Nov 29 ~Borrowing figures announced by Gordon Brown are precisely in line with the best estimates of
overall damage inflicted on the UK economy by the government's gross mismanagement of the FMD epidemic last year
Alan Beat comments: "Have you noticed that the hugely increased public borrowing figures announced on Wednesday by the
chancellor Gordon Brown (increase by £9 billion to £20 billion total) are precisely in line with the best estimates of
overall damage inflicted on the UK economy by the government's gross mismanagement of the FMD epidemic last year? Is
anyone surprised that such a massive hole has now "appeared" in the finances of UK plc, when an equivalent massive sum
evaporated on the funeral pyres of the mass-slaughter policy? Yet not a single commentator has even mentioned this most
obvious correlation. How quickly the media forget."
Nov 29 ~ Read too Alan's trenchant analysis of the various reports
in an article published by Country Smallholding (but unavailable on their website). Extract: (Iain Anderson) "does nevertheless note that "contingency planning for vaccination was minimal" and that the UK government had failed to implement EU guidelines in this area. He details the scientific recommendation that emergency vaccination should be used, for which EU authorisation was given on 30th March, and notes that sufficient vaccine stocks and trained staff were in place to implement this. He correctly identifies the National Farmers Union (NFU) as blocking this move, and remaining resolutely opposed to vaccination throughout the crisis (in confirmation of this, I also interviewed Ben Gill of the NFU with the film crew and he assured us, on camera, that food industry concerns had been a minor side issue and that he personally claimed the credit for stopping the proposed use of vaccination).
Anderson recommends that the option of vaccination should form part of any future strategy for FMD control, but is vague on how this will be achieved in the face of the intransigent prejudice that was seen in the UK during 2001.
The implication for smallholders and pet owners is that the future use of vaccination is still very far from assured, and that much work remains to be done before vaccination to live will actually replace mass slaughter." Read full article
Nov 29 ~ Defra underlines that the NSP is voluntary
In its press release of November 26:" DEFRA CONSULTS STAKEHOLDERS ON HELP FOR SCRAPIE
AFFECTED FARMS" DEFRA gives a link to the consultation paper itself (consultation ends on 4th February 2003) and its "Notes for editors" are as follows:
- Scrapie is a fatal neurological disease of sheep. It has been present in
the national sheep flock for over 250 years, but is not considered to be
transmissible to humans. There is a theoretical risk that BSE could be
present in sheep, masked by scrapie, although it has not been found naturally
occurring in sheep. The National Scrapie Plan for Great Britain (NSP)
addresses that risk.
- The NSP is a voluntary, long-term programme of breeding for genetic
resistance to scrapie. Since the Plan was launched in July 2001 over 260,000
sheep have been genotyped in over 7,000 member flocks.
- The NSP Scrapie Flocks Scheme will be opened to farmers on holdings that
have had a confirmed case of scrapie since July 1998 (the introduction of
compulsory slaughter and compensation for scrapie suspects).
- The European Commission has published proposals for compulsory scrapie
genotyping - on scrapie affected holdings - that are substantially similar to
the proposed NSP Scrapie Flocks Scheme. The date of application of these
proposals is unclear but it is not expected to be until late 2003 at the
earliest. They will only apply to holdings with scrapie after their
application. In the meantime the NSP Scrapie Flocks Scheme will enable help
to be targeted at known historically affected holdings in Great Britain as
well as those currently affected.
- The Department for Agriculture and Rural Development in Northern Ireland
will be developing a similar scheme as part of the Northern Ireland Scrapie
Plan.
- The NSP is kept under regular scientific review.
- Recent laboratory experiments (PN 468/02) have shown that sheep can develop
BSE when injected with BSE material directly into the brain. This is not a
natural route. No sheep are known to have developed the disease through
natural transmission.
One does rather wonder what DEFRA's definition of "under regular scientific review" is.
Nov 28 ~ Corrections
Alan Beat points out that the date of Prof King's appointment as Chief Scientific Officer is wrongly given: "King was appointed in October 2000 - see attached page from OST website. I'm guessing that the March 22nd or 23rd date
referred to by Booker is that of the "presentation" given by Anderson to King and MAFF officials. None of these key
players were appointed on or around that date, so the error can't be corrected simply by substituting King's name
for Anderson."
Our apologies - and thanks. As always, we are very grateful to readers who take the trouble to point out and correct errors of fact.
Similarly, with help from the NFMG, we are scrutinising the report of the FVO mission referred to in the Booker's Notebook article. See immediately below:
Nov 28 ~ From my reading it does not allow for a blanket pre-emptive/contiguous cull.
"Many thanks for tracking down where the pre-emptive/contig cull is found in EU legislation - and back to our old Friend - Decision 257. The actual wording in Decision 257 states at Para 5
(5) In addition to the measures within the framework of
Directive 85/511/EEC, the United Kingdom apply the pre-emptive
killing of susceptible animals in holdings situated in close
proximity to infected or suspect holdings, taking into account
the epidemiological situation, the high density of susceptible
animals in certain parts of the territory and the poor
expression of clinical signs in certain susceptible species.
Again there are issues to be taken into account - which does not direct that the policy be applied without consideration of certain criteria.
The Decision was primarily to allow emergency vaccination in Cumbria & Devon. From my reading it does not allow for a blanket pre-emptive/contig cull.
Para 5 - which relates to the contiguous cull - ALSO sets out the criteria that should be applied - ie some form of assessment and what should be taken into consideration. What we always argued was not that the Contig Cull per se should not be considered - BUT that proper RISK ASSESSMENT should be undertaken first - to ascertain whether such an approach was justified - ie not a blanket policy to be applied without assessing the need ; it formed the basis of all the appeals and challenges e.g Grunty.
We know that DEFRA/Maff just blindly pursued the Contig Cull/pre-empt culls with no regard to any risk assessment or any analysis of the circumstances pertaining to each case. - which, from my reading, is contrary to what Decision 257 stipulates."
More on this later today - dv.
Nov 28 ~"The publication of the European report into the outbreak - still to be
debated - was a damning finding of guilt..."
Western Morning News"... Farmers had been
intimidated, the proper procedures ignored and European Union laws
openly flouted." The article, by Farming Editor Peter Hall and reporter
Andrea Kuhn, talks of "the final word" and that "It is time the whole foot and mouth disease fiasco of last year was
confined to the history books - a dark shadow over the start of the 21st
century for the United Kingdom, when a Government dithered as the
countryside burned"
But where does the responsiblity lie? To some of us, it is fundamental that those responsible (either in the UK or the EU or both) are held to account. Such a horror must never be allowed to happen again.
Nov 30 ~ Initial tests on bullock are negative (as expected).
Tests are to continue for 96 hours
Nov 29 ~ FMD symptoms in Scotland
The BBC says, " A farm in the north east of Scotland has been cordoned off after an animal was found with foot-and-mouth symptoms.
A seven-month-old bullock on the farm in Huntly, Aberdeenshire, has mouth lesions.
As a precaution, movement restrictions have been placed on the farm and all others within an 8km (five miles) radius.
Samples from the animal have been sent to the international reference laboratory at the Institute of Animal Health in Pirbright, Surrey. Initial results will not be available until Saturday morning. ." The BBC then says "Up to 10 million animals were destroyed during the foot-and-mouth crisis." and adds, " Opinion is divided among experts as to whether or not animals should be vaccinated against foot-and-mouth to prevent a further widespread outbreak."
We would take issue with this. Experts in FMD were saying in February 2001 and continue to say loud and clear that vaccination should be the first tool considered in our fight against this disease. Opinion to the contrary is political. If the USA are now fully geared up to use rapid diagnosis kits (and they are ) why must it take the UK until tomorrow for this bullock's symptoms to be diagnosed in the laboratory and a further three days for confirmation?
Nov 29 ~ Manchester Conference "interesting and highly charged"
On Wednesday 27th November, Manchester Art Gallery held a conference to discuss the proposal to organise a 'Cultural Documents of FMD' national exhibition project, including a publication, and a supporting urban/rural public discussion programme about FMD, to tour the main urban centres during 2003/4.
We hear that "the meeting was very interesting and highly charged as you can imagine.
David Black gave an excellent and evocative account of the Cumbrian experience from a vet's viewpoint.
Christopher Chapman read out his eye-witness account of the elimination of an entire herd at a farm at Ramscliffe in Devon complete with his photographs - which was very moving.
Professor Ian Mercer CBE, gave an entertaining talk on the enquiry held in Devon. and David Rackstraw ( Legal Dept of Cumbran County Council) produced the new Report from Cumbria just hot off the press which makes very interesting reading." We hope to publish the agenda later on.
Nov 29 ~Borrowing figures announced by Gordon Brown are precisely in line with the best estimates of
overall damage inflicted on the UK economy by the government's gross mismanagement of the FMD epidemic last year
Alan Beat comments: "Have you noticed that the hugely increased public borrowing figures announced on Wednesday by the
chancellor Gordon Brown (increase by £9 billion to £20 billion total) are precisely in line with the best estimates of
overall damage inflicted on the UK economy by the government's gross mismanagement of the FMD epidemic last year? Is
anyone surprised that such a massive hole has now "appeared" in the finances of UK plc, when an equivalent massive sum
evaporated on the funeral pyres of the mass-slaughter policy? Yet not a single commentator has even mentioned this most
obvious correlation. How quickly the media forget."
Nov 29 ~ Read too Alan's trenchant analysis of the various reports
in an article published by Country Smallholding (but unavailable on their website). Extract: (Iain Anderson) "does nevertheless note that "contingency planning for vaccination was minimal" and that the UK government had failed to implement EU guidelines in this area. He details the scientific recommendation that emergency vaccination should be used, for which EU authorisation was given on 30th March, and notes that sufficient vaccine stocks and trained staff were in place to implement this. He correctly identifies the National Farmers Union (NFU) as blocking this move, and remaining resolutely opposed to vaccination throughout the crisis (in confirmation of this, I also interviewed Ben Gill of the NFU with the film crew and he assured us, on camera, that food industry concerns had been a minor side issue and that he personally claimed the credit for stopping the proposed use of vaccination).
Anderson recommends that the option of vaccination should form part of any future strategy for FMD control, but is vague on how this will be achieved in the face of the intransigent prejudice that was seen in the UK during 2001.
The implication for smallholders and pet owners is that the future use of vaccination is still very far from assured, and that much work remains to be done before vaccination to live will actually replace mass slaughter." Read full article
Nov 29 ~ Defra underlines that the NSP is voluntary
In its press release of November 26:" DEFRA CONSULTS STAKEHOLDERS ON HELP FOR SCRAPIE
AFFECTED FARMS" DEFRA gives a link to the consultation paper itself (consultation ends on 4th February 2003) and its "Notes for editors" are as follows:
- Scrapie is a fatal neurological disease of sheep. It has been present in
the national sheep flock for over 250 years, but is not considered to be
transmissible to humans. There is a theoretical risk that BSE could be
present in sheep, masked by scrapie, although it has not been found naturally
occurring in sheep. The National Scrapie Plan for Great Britain (NSP)
addresses that risk.
- The NSP is a voluntary, long-term programme of breeding for genetic
resistance to scrapie. Since the Plan was launched in July 2001 over 260,000
sheep have been genotyped in over 7,000 member flocks.
- The NSP Scrapie Flocks Scheme will be opened to farmers on holdings that
have had a confirmed case of scrapie since July 1998 (the introduction of
compulsory slaughter and compensation for scrapie suspects).
- The European Commission has published proposals for compulsory scrapie
genotyping - on scrapie affected holdings - that are substantially similar to
the proposed NSP Scrapie Flocks Scheme. The date of application of these
proposals is unclear but it is not expected to be until late 2003 at the
earliest. They will only apply to holdings with scrapie after their
application. In the meantime the NSP Scrapie Flocks Scheme will enable help
to be targeted at known historically affected holdings in Great Britain as
well as those currently affected.
- The Department for Agriculture and Rural Development in Northern Ireland
will be developing a similar scheme as part of the Northern Ireland Scrapie
Plan.
- The NSP is kept under regular scientific review.
- Recent laboratory experiments (PN 468/02) have shown that sheep can develop
BSE when injected with BSE material directly into the brain. This is not a
natural route. No sheep are known to have developed the disease through
natural transmission.
One does rather wonder what DEFRA's definition of "under regular scientific review" is.
Nov 28 ~ Corrections
Alan Beat points out that the date of Prof King's appointment as Chief Scientific Officer is wrongly given: "King was appointed in October 2000 - see attached page from OST website. I'm guessing that the March 22nd or 23rd date
referred to by Booker is that of the "presentation" given by Anderson to King and MAFF officials. None of these key
players were appointed on or around that date, so the error can't be corrected simply by substituting King's name
for Anderson."
Our apologies - and thanks. As always, we are very grateful to readers who take the trouble to point out and correct errors of fact.
Similarly, with help from the NFMG, we are scrutinising the report of the FVO mission referred to in the Booker's Notebook article. See immediately below:
Nov 28 ~ From my reading it does not allow for a blanket pre-emptive/contiguous cull.
"Many thanks for tracking down where the pre-emptive/contig cull is found in EU legislation - and back to our old Friend - Decision 257. The actual wording in Decision 257 states at Para 5
(5) In addition to the measures within the framework of
Directive 85/511/EEC, the United Kingdom apply the pre-emptive
killing of susceptible animals in holdings situated in close
proximity to infected or suspect holdings, taking into account
the epidemiological situation, the high density of susceptible
animals in certain parts of the territory and the poor
expression of clinical signs in certain susceptible species.
Again there are issues to be taken into account - which does not direct that the policy be applied without consideration of certain criteria.
The Decision was primarily to allow emergency vaccination in Cumbria & Devon. From my reading it does not allow for a blanket pre-emptive/contig cull.
Para 5 - which relates to the contiguous cull - ALSO sets out the criteria that should be applied - ie some form of assessment and what should be taken into consideration. What we always argued was not that the Contig Cull per se should not be considered - BUT that proper RISK ASSESSMENT should be undertaken first - to ascertain whether such an approach was justified - ie not a blanket policy to be applied without assessing the need ; it formed the basis of all the appeals and challenges e.g Grunty.
We know that DEFRA/Maff just blindly pursued the Contig Cull/pre-empt culls with no regard to any risk assessment or any analysis of the circumstances pertaining to each case. - which, from my reading, is contrary to what Decision 257 stipulates."
More on this later today - dv.
Nov 28 ~"The publication of the European report into the outbreak - still to be
debated - was a damning finding of guilt..."
Western Morning News"... Farmers had been
intimidated, the proper procedures ignored and European Union laws
openly flouted." The article, by Farming Editor Peter Hall and reporter
Andrea Kuhn, talks of "the final word" and that "It is time the whole foot and mouth disease fiasco of last year was
confined to the history books - a dark shadow over the start of the 21st
century for the United Kingdom, when a Government dithered as the
countryside burned"
But where does the responsiblity lie? To some of us, it is fundamental that those responsible (either in the UK or the EU or both) are held to account. Such a horror must never be allowed to happen again.
Nov 28 ~ What
should have been a carefully thought through, intensively managed and
adequately resourced amalgamation, phased over several months, was
instead cobbled together in a matter of a few hours. We have been paying
a heavy price for that - in administrative incompetence and a complete
absence of political vision - ever since.
Anthony Gibson, writing in the Western Morning News, "...Keeping the 20-day
standstill in place, even in the slightly amended form which has applied
since September, has added hugely to the cost and difficulty of
livestock farming, without conferring any real benefit in
disease-control terms. That is because it has missed its target.
The livestock dealers, whose activities it was intended to curtail, have
mostly found ways around it. It has been the small, traditional, mixed
livestock farms, and the auction markets on which they depend, which
have borne the brunt of the unfairness of the 20-day rule, and it is no
wonder that a grassroots revolt seems to be building up a head of steam.
This isn't to argue that we should go back to a complete free for all,
but we must have a regime which is proportionate to the risk. Bad laws
will always be broken or ignored, and that would be the worst of all
worlds. Part of the legacy of foot and mouth is Defra itself. ....What
should have been a carefully thought through, intensively managed and
adequately resourced amalgamation, phased over several months, was
instead cobbled together in a matter of a few hours. We have been paying
a heavy price for that - in administrative incompetence and a complete
absence of political vision - ever since."
However, Mr Gibson sees some positive aspects such as the Curry Report and " Much will depend on
what the long-awaited "Sustainable Farming and Food Strategy" contains
when it is published in December. But at least there will be a strategy,
and an implementation group to push it through. Without foot and mouth,
I doubt we would have had either." He too feels it is time to draw a line under the disaster. It would appear that the Western Morning News agrees.
Nov 28 ~ The threat to local slaughterhouses
Lawrence's message to his MP is short and stark: "If the small local abattoirs, [like Traditional Devon Meats at Combe Martin] are driven out of business, or made prohibitively expensive, it will become impossible for small producers like us to have our own animals killed locally and to our own requirements [for proper hanging, style of cutting, etc.]. It will take away the possibility of having many local speciality foods - and knock on to "quality of life", local tourism and so on. Anything you can do to help would be greatly appreciated..."
Nov 27 ~ Hundreds of UK abattoirs could close if new EU regulations are implemented
CLA press release
150 Organisations Unite to Oppose Threat to the Countryside
Speaking on behalf of the CLA, NFWI and Soil Association, CLA Executive Committee Member Caroline Cranbrook said:
"These new EU regulations would have disastrous consequences and must be stopped. Providing for full recovery from the industry of all meat inspection costs and for changes to the arrangements for disposal of blood by-products, they would spell the end of the line for the UK's small and medium-sized abattoirs, while the large ones would become less competitive.
.....
"Defra must stand firm in fighting for the survival of a diverse UK meat processing industry. The Curry Report and the FMD inquiry reports all recognised the significance of small and medium-sized enterprises to a sustainable rural economy. We can't afford to lose our smaller local abattoirs and cutting plants - they currently process 49% of UK livestock and are needed to deal with specialist and local meats, to provide jobs in rural communities and to minimise the distances travelled by animals." Read press release and further information about the proposal and regulations extract:"... Under the new arrangements, smaller abattoirs would have to invest in refrigerated storage tanks, where blood would await collection, probably on a weekly basis. As well as the expense, this could give rise to planning issues. Disposal by this means would mean substantially increased long-distance lorry journeys, creating additional emissions, hazards and possible nuisance. There is no scientific or other rational basis for the imposition of blood storage and central disposal."
Nov 27 ~ "I was talking about the 20-day movement rule and how difficult it made things and he said he knew and that there was no common-sense with it."
Farmers Weekly Interactive reports on the visit to the Royal Smithfield Show on Monday (25 November) by Prince of Wales. Prince Charles' staunch and disinterested support for the small farmers of rural England has never wavered. We feel enormous gratitude to him for his fearless championship of the values we hold as dear as England itself.
"...he appeared undeterred by recent criticism about his policy of writing to government ministers on issues of concern.
Prince Charles had stopped to chat to Gordon Tully who runs the Wadderton Herd of South Devon cattle.
Mr Tully told Farmers Weekly that the Prince had indicated he was continuing to push Defra to help the industry.
"We thanked him very much for his support [for the British farming industry] and he told us that he had been on to Defra again this week," said Mr Tully.
"I was talking about the 20-day movement rule and how difficult it made things and he said he knew and that there was no common-sense with it...."
Nov 27 ~"Anderson was not appointed to any post really, he just wormed his way in via John Krebs of the FSA to emerge as the pre-eminent computer modelling "expert", making a "presentation" of his teams findings to MAFF/King on 23rd March
Correction. It has been pointed out to us that we give the impression that we think that Professor Roy Anderson was appointed "Chief Scientific Adviser" The apparent error was owing to a connecting sentence having been left out in the paragraph below about the chronology of the implementation of the zealous "cull" policy. We are, of course, fully aware that Professor David King was appointed Chief Scientific Adviser in March 2001 and apologise for any confusion. We tend to forget that some readers of warmwell are not as conversant - indeed obsessed - with these matters as we are.
The emailer continued "Anderson was not appointed to any post really, he just wormed his way in via John Krebs of the FSA to emerge as the pre-eminent computer modelling "expert", making a "presentation" of his teams findings to MAFF/King on 23rd March, and thereafter became part of the informal Science Group that advised King."
Nov 26 ~ Was Christopher Booker (Booker's Notebook) letting King, Anderson, and many others, who are truly responsible, off the hook?
Dr Richard North had the chance as a researcher with the EU Parliamentary inquiry to call up documents which had not been previously published. He discovered the report made by a team from the EU's Food and Veterinary Office (FVO) when it visited the UK and Cumbria in particular between March 12 and 16. I was
puzzled by Mr Byrne's apparent lack of concern about the "cull". However,
reviewing the genesis of the policy, it is clear that it was decided on or
about the 23 March 2001. This date is possible very important because,
between 12-16 March, an FVO mission was in the UK assessing the situation as regards FMD.
In the final report of the mission (DG(SANCO)/3318/2001 - MR final),
however, it is recommended that "as a matter of urgency" the UK government:
"consider preventative slaughter in certain circumstances in an attempt to
'get ahead' of the disease...".
This, in all but name, is (or could be construed to be) a recommendation
that the UK carry out a contiguous cull policy. In the manner of things, it is
quite likely that this recommendation was conveyed verbally to UK government
officials at the end of the mission, to which effect that advice would have
been given on or about the 16th March, BEFORE the UK government adopted its policy on 23 March.
These officials, basically working for the Commission, 'recommended' (ie ordered) that MAFF should go for a contiguous pre-emptive cull.
Anderson was already arguing for such an illegal policy, but had not yet been put in the position to do anything about it. (The sentence about Prof King's appointment that followed must be corrected. Prof King was appointed in October 2000, as was pointed out on Nov 27)
It may be that Anderson and the FVO officials consulted on this. There is no evidence about this. But in light of the authority vested in the EU Veterinary Committee, any 'recommendation' by the FVO would have to be treated as an instruction.
It is in this sense that ultimate responsibility for what is now known as the 'pre-emptive cull' must rest with the FVO and the Commission. They probably did not even concern themselves with whether, under UK law, such a policy was legal. Anderson was no doubt delighted, and did all he could to champion the new 'cull' policy. But regardless of what he and his team might already have recommended, he was not yet in a position to decide policy when the decision was taken.
It seems clear to us that Richard North and Christopher Booker have no desire to let Roy Anderson and his team off any hook. They probably did more to expose their sinister and crooked role in this story than anyone.
Nov 25/26 ~".. how it could best serve the needs and experiences of the rural and farming communities who, directly and indirectly, suffered (and continue to suffer) the effects of FMD"
See message about
...a one day forum (10 - 5pm) Wednesday 27th November, Manchester Art Gallery about a proposal to organise a 'Cultural Documents of FMD' national exhibition project, including a publication, and a supporting urban/rural public discussion programme about FMD, to tour the main urban centres during 2003/4. The purpose of the Manchester forum is to allow all interested parties and communities; farming, arts, rural health, museum, media, veterinary, etc., to discuss how the exhibition could be constructed, and how it could best serve the needs and experiences of the rural and farming communities who, directly and indirectly, suffered (and continue to suffer) the effects of FMD.
Nov 25/26 ~ the government does not believe Britain should be self-sufficient in food.
Lord Whitty has told farmers that the government does not believe Britain should be self-sufficient in food.
Britain is part of the global economy and farmers should compete on the world market, he told journalists at the Royal Smithfield Show.
"A [self-sufficiency] target is not what drives policy," Lord Whitty said on Monday (25 November). "Being competitive drives policy" Read the Farmers Weekly interactive article by Isabel Davies.
See also the article in FWi from July this year: Beckett backs food imports...extract:
"Lord Haskins, the government's former rural recovery coordinator
... said that many British farmers were still "digging for victory", believing that national security was at risk unless the country was self-sufficient in food.
"They need to be told that the war is 60 years over," the Labour peer said.
Referring to recent comments by Prince Charles who called for Britain to produce more food, Lord Haskins continued: "People in the countryside spend a lot of time looking backwards rather than forwards.
"The heir to the throne is a prime example of that, believing we should live in a feudal society where we should all pay more for our food."...."
Evidently Lord Haskins and members of the government are prime examples of those believing we should live in a considerably more feudal society where, with "England" just a word for History books, we should all pay homage to a centralised bureaucracy far beyond these shores.
Nov 25 ~ "There is no reason, except ignorance, why this island should not feed itself, value its farm animals and be a whole lot healthier - mentally and physically." Hilary Peters
Hilary's updated real food diary should be read.(new window)
"I am on this journey for the same reason I started a city farm, which is the same reason I became a gardener. I am moved by the dreadful cut-offness of humans from the natural world. This cut-offness has some strange symptoms. One recurring one is people's inability to admit that they are moved by animal suffering. They would find it easier to tell you they had AIDS than say that they cared about animal welfare. Genuine care for animals is disguised as "good stockmanship". Taste and human health are considered more relevant to the consumer than whether the animal had a good life and a painless death. Farmers who obviously care for their animals are ashamed to admit this. Why?"
(One of several comments received today about Hilary's contention that farmers do not readily admit to caring about their stock:"...Well that is certainly much of my motivation and of pretty well all the
farmers that I know....and it is why the RCVS, RSPCA etc have built up so
many determined enemies.
Farmers and others do not want to be associated with
the loony animal welfare brigade. It does not mean that they don't care.")
Hilary's quest for outlets of good English farm produce can be found in her edairy here. As she says, "There is no reason, except ignorance, why this island should not feed itself, value its farm animals and be a whole lot healthier - mentally and physically."
Nov 25 ~ 86,260 sheep and goat blood samples were taken across the UK to test for diseases that are not, and have never been, present. Statistically necessary, or jobs for the boys?
An extract from the smallholders' newsletter today
"The sole purpose of these tests is to justify UK "disease-free" status for purposes of international trade. Sound familiar?
We were disgusted to have been taken in by this scam and will certainly NOT be co-operating with any such nonsense in the future. It is an entirely pointless and expensive exercise to keep some well-paid individuals employed in completely useless occupation. Not on our sheep, never again."
Nov 25 ~ Swill Feeder to sue DEFRA
On Wednesday 27/11/02 at 2.30 pm. Mr. Jason Podimore, a former swill feeder, will lodge a claim of misfeasance and abuse of power against DEFRA in the High Court in London. Mr. Podimore says "At the beginning of the FMD epidemic MAFF covered up their criminal negligence which was responsible for the disease being allowed to spread around the country. The swill feeding industry was closed down without justification or proper consultation and contrary to the evidence. I and others have lost our homes and businesses because of MAFF's disgraceful campaign to find scapegoats. DEFRA took over from MAFF and therefore I am having to sue them." Mr Podimore is acting in person with the help of a volunteer litigant's friend.
For further information contact Robert Persey Tel 01404841202 or 07170620143."
Nov 25 ~ Questions about legality are not going away
Jeff Swift's "Over the Gate" (Westmorland Gazette) is a useful barometer: " ...In reminding you that Anderson said in his foot-and-mouth inquiry report, "we were unable to determine whether the contiguous cull was legal or not," I should also tell you that the European Committee, after looking into the handling of foot-and-mouth in the United Kingdom, also had doubts about the legality of the contiguous cull.
Then when you think about the suggestion that in 1967/68, more than 90 per cent of animals slaughtered had been confirmed as having foot-and-mouth, and that in 2001 more than 90 per cent did NOT have foot-and-mouth - what do you make of it all?
Was that yet another reason the Government refused a public inquiry?" Westmorland Gazette
Nov 25 ~ "in March 2001 EU vets instructed Britain to fall back on the policy of pre-emptive culling, which resulted in the deaths of nine million healthy animals and was, under UK law, illegal."
Sunday Telegraph Booker's Notebook " Under the 1981 Animal Health Act, ministers did not have the power to order the killing of non-infected animals without evidence that they had been directly exposed to infection. This the Government has tacitly conceded in its new Animal Health Act, giving ministers precisely the powers to order pre-emptive killing that in 2001 they claimed to have but did not possess..."
See also warmwell for April 21 2002
Nov 25 ~ "Without profitable farming, both the wider rural economy and the landscape that we all cherish will suffer." David Lidington
The Country Land and Business Association (CLA) has announced the results of independent research conducted by ICM on its behalf, showing that the public cares about the British farming industry. Commenting, Shadow Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, David Lidington MP, said:
"The CLA's survey confirms the gravity of the crisis in British farming.
"Without profitable farming, both the wider rural economy and the landscape that we all cherish will suffer.
"Some of the solutions to the current crisis will need international agreement. But there are things that the British government could and should do now:
- Introduce an honest food labelling scheme so consumers know when they are buying British food;
- Stop adding to farmers' costs by gold-plating EU Directives and imposing extra rules and levies here;
- Taking action to stop illegal meat imports into Britain.
"Ministers should be concentrating their scarce time on tackling these issues. They should drop their obsession with hunting and focus on the desperate plight of Britain's farmers."
Nov 23 ~ The EU Final Report translated by the Labour Spinners into "Anti-Government Rant"
Margaret
Beckett has claimed that the report was "hijacked for political purposes" - but the report received cross-party support in Europe, had been written by a German socialist MEP, and
its
final version had been unanimously backed by the committee which included one
Labour MEP from the UK.
According to the report from the North Devon website
"Mrs Beckett's criticism of the European Parliament report surprised many
yesterday because its recommendations were broadly in line with those of the
Government's own "Lessons Learned" inquiry and those of the inquiry ordered
by Devon County Council. Her comments looked even stranger when, later in the day, she told a
committee of MPs that although she was "aware" of the European report she
had "not had the chance to study it in any depth".
We can only feel sorrowful that the UK Government chooses to react this way, and echo the wise words from an emailer yesterday, "...GM's and trade globalisation are not the answer - but sound understanding of the economic and social dynamic needed to sustain and support communities and countries - without irrevocably hammering the planet to bits and subjugating animals and humans to a life devoid of any spirit or soul." If New Labour and DEFRA could adopt this view we could support them wholeheartedly. Party politics would not enter into it at all.
Articles about the EU final report from regional newspapers
The article Neil Parish wrote in Thursday's Western Morning News, shows why the EU Report into FMD was not an exercise in party politics.
"
.. here in the South West. When Nick Brown and Margaret Beckett came to give evidence, in their usual arrogant way they dismissed the claims of harassment by Government from farmers as isolated incidents, blown all out of proportion. This view was comprehensively destroyed by one two-hour meeting in a little village hall in the South West.
Many of you will know the terrible tale of the bungled cull in Knowstone; it was a shocking but not isolated tale. But the MEPs who attended a packed meeting were visibly shocked by the evidence we heard from the farmers and locals. The emotional and charged tales moved some to tears. They were not the politically-motivated opinions of people wanting to attack the Government, as the Labour press machine tried to paint them.
They were just honest, straightforward people recounting a horrific chapter in the history of their village, and they left the MEPs in stunned silence when we boarded the coach to our next meeting in Okehampton.
As one farmer said to the committee: "I feared a knock on the door from a MAFF official more than I feared the disease itself.". I believe that one meeting did more than anything else to bring home the realities, and it has undoubtedly shaped the future policies of the EU...."
Read a collection of the articles on the EU Final Report from the newspapers.
Nov 22 ~ Defra was a
back-of-the-envelope job on election night
Paul Linford of the Newcastle Journal reveals how Brian Bender admitted to the EFRA committee that the emergence of DEFRA had been unplanned: ".... "It was an unplanned merger."
He said officials had been planning for the replacement of Maff with a new
Ministry of Rural Affairs because that was a Labour manifesto commitment.
"What was unplanned was the fact that environment was to be included in the
new ministry and that made a considerable difference," he said.
.....Hexham MP Peter Atkinson said last night Mr Bender's comments constituted
"an extraordinary admission." He said: "It seems that Defra was a
back-of-the-envelope job on election night by the prime minister. No wonder
the place is in complete chaos."
Mr Bender's revelation comes a week after the Committee launched a
hard-hitting report calling into question the department's whole existence.
It said Defra had failed to do enough to champion rural areas and farming
and was "pessimistic" about its commitment to sustainable development..."
Nov 22 ~ DEFRA in its usual heavy handed and officious way have chosen to write these unnecessary threatening letters to the farmers - as though the delay in testing were their faults.
We have received a copy of this extraordinary letter from DEFRA to a farmer in the West Country. Perhaps DEFRA might consider its commitment to improved communication skills if it really wants to repair some of the damage of the past eighteen months. It might also attempt to learn how testing is done around the farms and who is responsible for it. The reaction of most people to the tone and content of such letters would surely be furious exasperation and a determination not to cooperate.
Nov 21 ~ EU Final Report "The report suggests that the true scale of infection was exaggerated or obscured to justify the contiguous cull policy."
(from the Telegraph report by Robert Uhlig) "Since only a very small number of cases were actually tested, and that relatively few cases were confirmed to have the disease, it is crucial that the epidemiological data be published and subject to independent critical analysis," it says.
It says there were unpardonable delays in decision-making, "violations of animal welfare legislation during culls", with breaches of environmental legislation in the arrangements for mass burial pits and funeral pyres for slaughtered animals.
Blaming the Government for failing to bring the disease under control, it recommends that all farmers - not just those who lost livestock - but those who suffered consequentially along with other affected industries such as tourism - should be entitled to compensation. It also calls on the European Commission "as a matter of urgency" to review its policy on meat imports..."
Nov 21 ~EU Final Report "The appropriateness of the unvalidated models used to model the course of the epidemic remains scientifically controversial and in particular is challenged by veterinary scientists with FMD expertise.
The (deletion) models used ultimately resulted in the proposal at the end of March 2001 for the novel 24/48 hours contiguous culls (i.e. slaughtering susceptible animals at infected farms within 24 hours of the infection's being diagnosed and slaughtering susceptible animals at neighbouring farms within 48 hours). A strategy which was fraught with inevitable lax biosecurity and documented infringements of animal welfare law..."
"....contingency plans and the logistical and staffing preparations for an outbreak of FMD or other notifiable exotic animal diseases in the United Kingdom were suffering from considerable shortcomings, according to a report of February 1999 commissioned by the state veterinary service (Drummond Report). Hardly anything had been done to implement this report's recommendations for remedying the shortcomings before the crisis arose, even though in July 2000 the head of the state veterinary service expressed extreme concern about the state of preparations, particularly with regard to slaughter, disposal of animal carcases, staff training and the availability of up-to-date contingency plans..."
Nov 21 ~ EU Final Report "It has become clear from the 2001 epidemic that mass culling on the scale seen in the UK and the Netherlands will not be publicly acceptable again and that alternative control strategies are therefore essential."
Examples of amended points in the report (see comparison)
"The handling of the epidemic was characterised by a lack of co-ordination between veterinary and policy staff within the State Veterinary Service and between the Regions and the centre. This led to a number of difficulties in defining and implementing the Government's control strategy. A clear delineation of powers was lacking."
"Many offers of help from veterinary surgeons in the UK, both with and without previous experience of FMD were ignored though hundreds of foreign vets were deployed."
"Pen-side tests that could be used by veterinarians in the field urgently need to be internationally validated, and further developed so that they are sufficiently cheap and robust for regular use. When developed, they should be linked electronically to a central database that would hold all the results in an outbreak."
Nov 20/21 ~ EU Final Report"....it is crucial that the epidemiological data be published and subject to independent critical analysis"
"4a. Since only a very small number of cases were actually tested, and that relatively few cases were confirmed to have the disease on laboratory testing, it is crucial that the epidemiological data be published and subject to independent critical analysis, so that lessons about disease spread and control can be learned for the future." We are very relieved to see this amendment in the final report.
Nov 20/21 ~ EU Final Report " ...emergency vaccination must be considered as a first-choice option from the outset"
" 57 ...emergency vaccination with the aim of allowing animals to live for normal further use should no longer be regarded as a last resort for controlling FMD but must be considered as a first-choice option from the outset."
The EU final report has removed the "on a par" phrase (see below) in its final report today
A comparison between the draft form and the final report may be seen here where we have put the two texts side by side.
Nov 20/21 ~ EU Final Report "Almost every line of this report should shame the government..." Neil Parish MEP
He continues in this briefing note:"Its inept handling of the foot and mouth outbreak is now well documented. It is no surprise that the government has done everything in its powers to hide this evidence from the British people.
The report shows that the outbreak could have been better contained if the government had put in place an immediate ban on the movement of animals.
It shows how farmers were intimidated, procedures ignored and EU laws flouted.
There is also clear evidence that the government has been falsifying figures in an attempt to play down the true impact of the outbreak. Government figures suggest that 6 million animals were slaughtered. Our findings point to a figure of 10 million."
See also report from the Independent.
There will be many farmers and concerned members of the public who have a great deal to thank Neil Parish and the other Conservative MEPs for this evening.
We are extremely grateful too to Dr Caroline Lucas of the Green Party, whose efforts have been extraordinary.
Nov20/21 ~ How the amendments fared
These are the adopted amendments :
1, 1 AMC, 9, 12, 13, 2 AMC, 21, 27, 29, 31, 32, 35, 36, 12 AMC, 43, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 53, 54 first part (second part rejected), 55, 58, 13 AMC, 62, 63, 4 AMC 1st and 2nd part (third and fourth part rejected), 5 AMC first part (second part rejected), 72, 6 AMC first part (second part rejected), 77, 78, 7 AMC, 85, 90, 94, 95, 96, 97, 100, 8 AMC (More info..), 105, 106, 107, 108 first part (second part rejected), 109 first part (second part rejected), 114, 115, 116, 119, 121, 122, 124, 127, 130, 131, 132, 139, 140, 10 AMC first and second part adopted (third part rejected), 148, 153, 158, 160, 162, 163, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 172, 174/175, 179, 180, 185, 187, 188,189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 195, 196, 11 AMC, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207 first part (second part rejected), 210, 211 first part (second part withdrawn), 213, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 228, 231, 240, 241, 242, 243, 245, 250, 251, 255, 259 second part (first part rejected), 260, 263, 264 first part (second part rejected), 265, 269, 271, 270, 272, oral amendment on LIT C
Attention : situation of 125 to be checked on the tape (probably rejected)
The two versions can be compared on warmwell here where the amendments made will be apparent.
Nov 20/21 ~ You need to state what you know, what you don't know, why you don't know it, what you are doing to find out about it, and when you expect to be able to get back to explain what you have found," he said.
Sound advice about the difference between a health risk and a health hazard from the World Health Organisation's Jorgen Schlundt.
Dr Schlundt was speaking at the British Crop Protection Council's conference in Brighton on Tuesday (19 November). See article on FWi." Risk assessment and risk management have been divorced for too long, he added.
And scientists should be prepared to be more open when assessing risks..."
Nov 20 ~ Slaughter "on a par" with vaccination - or is vaccination to be the tool of first resort?
We are still hoping soon to hear the result of this morning's deliberations in Strasbourg. Have the MEPs - in spite of pressure from the Labour members - decided to produce a document that gives modern vaccines against FMD their rightful place in future outbreaks? Or has power politics once again got in the way of sanity and humanity?
Nov 20 ~ "Since last I wrote about milk prices, in early September, I think it would be fair to say that the situation has gone from worse to bad. "
Anthony Gibson, writing in the Western Morning News today under the headline, "MOVE TOWARD CO-OPERATIVES IS OBVIOUS"
"The price to the farmer has improved, but not by nearly as much as milk producers had expected, needed or deserved.
Since last I wrote about milk prices, in early September, I think it would be fair to say that the situation has gone from worse to bad. The price to the farmer has improved, but not by nearly as much as milkproducers had expected, needed or deserved
....despite the fact that every dairy farmer will benefit from the
courage and enterprise of Milk Link and United Milk, every dairy farmer
is not contributing to the cost of it.
Instead, the burden is falling on those producers who were already
receiving among the lowest prices in the British dairy industry, and
that seems to me to be unfair...." Read Mr Gibson's article
Nov 20 ~ " Humans and chickens have large numbers of bacteria in their intestines most of which are not just not harmful but beneficial." Soil Association
Food-poison Warning over Organic Chickens says a dramatic headline in the Independent today following a "government-funded study for the Food Standards Agency" As always in these scare stories the FSA (now widely referred to privately as the "Food Scare Agency") is at pains to appear not to be creating a food poisoning scare: "...The agency tried to play down the findings yesterday, saying they were preliminary. " but it also said that ".. chickens were a major source of campylobacter and the micro-organisms were an important cause of food-borne disease"
Organic food and farming practices have come in for much criticism from Sir John Krebs, whose support for GM was mentioned here on November 16th. We notice the use of the word "possibly" in the sentence: "Free-range and organic chickens that are allowed to roam outdoors are possibly more likely to be exposed to outside sources of campylobacter."
The Soil Association said: " ..There are hundreds of strains of beneficial campylobacter and only a very small number can lead to food poisoning..... The association said that even if organic chickens were contaminated with campylobacter, the bugs were unlikely to be resistant to the antibiotics used to treat serious campylobacter infection."
Nov 19/20 ~ "This is a research finding in totally
artificial circumstances. It has no relevance whatever...."
was the opinion expressed by George Milne, a development officer with the National Sheep
Association in Scotland reported in the article by Maxwell Fordyce in the Scotsman. The sheep of a genotype thought to be scrapie resistant succumbed to BSE when its own brain was injected with diseased brain material. The experiment was carried out by the
Animal Health at Compton, Berkshire, as part of a £20 million government funded programme of
research into TSE diseases in sheep. Elliott Morley himself described the injection as "massive and unnatural". In his article, Mr Fordyce very worryingly comments,"As far as the public is concerned, the shorthand of yesterday's report
is that the most resistant of sheep can get BSE, no matter how they get it."
The Guardian article on the same subject can be read here.
Farmers Weekly interactive says "...Some producers may doubt the validity of the (NSP) programme.
....the possibility of BSE being present natiurally in sheep remained no more than a theoretical possibility, Mr Morley said.
John Thorley, chief executive of the National Sheep Association, said that the research was irrelevant in the real world.
"While this result is scientifically interesting, it has no practical relevance and should not impact on the government's scrapie policy at all.
"This is an unnatural route of infection and sheep of the [scrapie-resistant] genotype which have been fed BSE-infected material have remained free of BSE."
Nov 19 ~ Deer prevent debate on FMD at Strasbourg yesterday
We see from the Western Morning News that the debate on the Temporary Committee's report on foot and mouth had to be postponed yesterday. There was a herd of deer on the runway at Strasbourg. Diversion to Frankfurt and Basle airports meant that
MEPs, European Parliament staff and European Commissioners
had to be transferred to Strasbourg by buses and cars. The WMN comments: ".....yesterday's
transport problems where particularly embarrassing because 150 MPs from
the ten countries about to join the EU were flying in to get a taste of
European Parliament life.
"They must think they are joining some third world operation," said one
EU official.
...The scheduled debate on the Commission's inquiry and report into the
foot and mouth outbreak - known to be highly censorious of the British
Government's handling of the crisis, will now take place tomorrow
morning."
Nov 19 ~ Gordon Adam and the Labour MEPs " pressurising Wolfgang Kreissl-Dörfler, .. to remove the main recommendation that vaccination be used as the primary tool against future outbreaks..."
Robert Uhlig's article yesterday removes all doubt that the Labour MEPs are more interested in face-saving than in protecting the UK with the best means of disease control. Are they stll clinging to the hope that constant denials and objections will prevent the UK contiguous cull from being universally regarded with horror and contempt?
"...leading members of the committee said Labour MEPs led by Gordon Adam have been pressurising Wolfgang Kreissl-Dorfer, the committee's raporteur, to remove the main recommendation that vaccination be used as the primary tool against future outbreaks.....
Robert Sturdy, a Tory MEP and farmer, said: "We are convinced now that the contiguous cull was not instrumental in controlling the outbreak.
"We support culling, but only for infected animals, the herds they came from and known dangerous contacts. We will oppose any amendment to support contiguous culling, not least because it was illegal under British law."
See article from Telegraph
Nov 19 ~ Was it a misprint - or does the NFU really think that one million tonnes of
meat every year is "illegally imported"?
From yesterday's Scotsman: "....Although welcoming a recent EU decision to ban the import of meat for
personal consumption from countries outside the European Union, the NFU is
calling for stricter measures to tackle an estimated one million tonnes of
illegally imported meat every year."
Pat Gardiner comments: "The actual total import of all meat to the UK is in the range of 1M to 1.5M
tonnes per annum. So the NFU are effectively claiming that almost all
imported meat is smuggled?" And he gives the HM Customs and Excise figures for the total import of meat, which for 2001, was apparently 1.4M tonnes. Read more
Nov 18 ~The European Parliament's special inquiry into foot-and-mouth disease tonight will agree the final text
A report by Nicola Smith in The Scotsman:
"...The team of 30 cross party MEPs from around Europe are expected to conclude that "the British government's information policy was inadequate" and that contingency plans for an FMD outbreak had "considerable shortcomings".
The report states that Westminster's delay in implementing a ban on animal movements led to a dramatic increase in the number of cases and criticises "bureaucratic and formalistic procedures".
The inquiry has found that environmental legislation was breached by the mass burial pits and funeral pyres, which as a result "increased risks to human health and the environment from emissions and groundwater pollution". ..."
We await the final report, hoping it says considerably more than this.
Nov 18 ~ "It is irresponsible only to talk about obstacles without talking about action!": Dr Paul Sutmoller, refuting Mike German (Welsh Assembly)
An article in the Western Mail (Nov 13), in which Mike German was quoted as saying that major obstacles stand in the way of introducing a vaccination policy, has been challenged by Dr Paul Sutmoller (his comments in red). Dr Sutmoller knows more about the prevention, control and eradication of foot and mouth disease in Latin America and the Caribbean than anyone else. He has been described as having "the greatest
field experience on FMD in the world". In addition, he has spent many years of FMD research on pathogenicity, epidemiology, vaccine technology in the laboratory. His words should therefore perhaps carry more weight than those of politicians. He says: ".. routine vaccination when epidemiologically justified is a very feasible option."
Those who are, for some other reason, anxious to back-pedal on the emergency vaccination so strongly urged by the Royal Society and by the EU Temporary Committee, who repeat second-hand and unverified arguments, should take note of other points made by Dr Sutmoller: "The entire rules and regulations (EU and OIE) are being overhauled ....meat containing antibodies as a result of vaccination is the best guarantee that it is free of FMD virus!"
Nov 18 ~
10M animals died in foot and mouth
The following is on the back page of the Sunday Times:
"The number of animals slaughtered in last year's foot and
mouth epidemic was close to 10m, about 3.5 higher than
the number admitted by ministers, an inquiry has found.
The study by a committee from the European parliament
concluded that the government had deliberately excluded
young animals, mainly calves and lambs, from the figure
for animals slaughtered."
Warmwell first made clear in January this year, that official figures were wrong and that a conservative estimate of the number of animals "culled" was over 10 million. This has now been publicly acknowledged - at least by the EU Temporary Committee. It remains to be seen whether the BBC (whose figures crept, snail-like, from 3 million last year to its latest "almost seven million") will now give the true figure.
We are unable to forget that the vast majority of these ten million were free of FMD. Even some slaughtermen, we understand, let alone the farmers and stockmen and their families who cared for these animals, are still suffering from the trauma of the killings. The decision not to vaccinate turned an outbreak into a tragic national catastrophe.
The woeful lack of understanding in the Science Group, the misinformation about vaccination and means of virus spread, the panicky measures employed by certain DEFRA personnel and arrogant official refusal to listen to local expertise, the deadly centralisation, the ineffectual record keeping and communications systems revealed by the crisis, the bullying behaviour of certain elements in the SVS, the collusion of the RCVS in illegal practices, the continuing weaknesses in Contingency Planning - all these (most of which were dealt with in the excellent but ignored Devon Report) are only now very slowly coming to light.
Nov 18 ~ Feakins v. DEFRA
This was the case heard on Thursday and Friday last week. MAFF/DEFRA burned thousands of slaughtered animals on Mr Feakins' farm. Only then was it realised that some of the cattle had been over 5 years old. Material which may contain the prions thought to be responsible for BSE has to be handled with extreme care and disposed of in the most secure manner possible. The so-called "BSE prion" is not easily destroyed. Mr Feakins' lawyers argued that the removal of pyre ash and debris directly to landfill would be unlawful for any one of 4 reasons:
- (a.) it would be a breach of the domestic Animal By-Products Order 1999 (SI 1999/646);
- (b.) it would be a breach of the 1990 EU Animal Waste Directive (90/667);
- (c.) it would be a breach of the EU TSE Regulation (999/2001);
- (d.) it would be a breach of the domestic TSE Regulation (SI 2002/843).
The Ministry's position appears to have rested on the arguments that (a) the Animal By-Products Order 1999 (SI 1999/646) did not bind the Crown ( This is sometimes called "Crown Immunity"). The lawyers say it did bind them and they did not have Crown Immunity
On (b)-(d) the Ministry said they were entitled to take advantage of similarly worded EU derogations, permitting them to dispose of ash and parts of carcases by burial when there was a shortage of processing capacity caused by an epizootic disease.
Mr Feakins' side said that the situation has to be viewed now, not from the viewpoint of March 2001. There isn't a widespread epizootic disease outbreak now - so if there is a shortage of capacity something else is causing it.
The Judge has reserved his judgment. Informed guesswork suggests that the judgment may be given the week after next.
Nov 16 ~ "How come not a single vet has even suggested this is how CSF and FMD arrived?"
The Guardian article today on imported semen and the vast fortunes to be made from biotech has drawn this comment from the agricultural news and self-sufficiency expert, Pat Gardiner: "Quite aside from anything else, just look at the figures for
semen imports! I'm not surprised that we are getting outbreaks of animal
disease. Can you think of a better way of "smuggling" a problem in by
mistake?...No wonder the MAFF-Defra vets were so keen to cover-up the ownership of the
index case of CSF - direct links to farms in China."
The Guardian article includes this paragraph: ".. In September, hoping to save the government from being taken by surprise as it was over the GM crops debacle, Britain's agriculture and environment biotechnology commission, an advisory body, called for changes to the law to prepare for the advent of biotech animals, including farmyard clones. The government has yet to respond, and there is no law to prevent the import of semen from cloned stud bulls. " (More on this on the daily "other" news page)
Nov 16 ~ "The Prince's move came as Government figures showed that the foot and mouth crisis led to the largest exodus of farmers since the Second World War."
Prince Charles has called supermarkets to account on their treatment of farmers. The code of conduct intended to prevent supermarkets from forcing down prices is not working. Farmers are still being forced to sell their produce at the low prices demanded (often lower than the price of production) or face being blacklisted.
Prince Charles has called the heads of supermarkets to Highgrove. Robert Ulig in the Telegraph writes that the "Prince was expected to castigate the executives for exploiting farmers and for not sufficiently promoting local foods.
"Prince Charles, who runs a 1,800-acre organic farm, was said to be so incensed by supermarkets' "bullying" of farmers that he insisted the wives of each chief executive attend the dinner so they could hear farmers' complaints first hand......
"...The Agricultural and Horticultural Census showed that 15,000 farming jobs were lost in England in the year to June. Figures for Scotland and Wales remain to be published. The census found that 8,600 farmers abandoned farming and another 6,600 farm workers' jobs were lost."
Nov 16 ~ "..global agenda to depopulate livestock numbers is for reasons that have nothing whatsoever to do with health risks to the human race, but more to do with envisioned profits from multinational GM proteins."
An article in The Ecologist this week, likely to exasperate the establishment, takes a look at Mark Purdey's latest work on BSE, scrapie and deer wasting disease. Mark Purdey may be considered a "maverick" but his work will not go away in spite of attempts to hi-jack or undermine it. (See more about Mark Purdey's research)
"...Corporations have invested billions of pounds in researching and developing their GM arable protein crops and the complementary package of pesticides to go with them. So why would the Establishment spend any time or money investigating my peer-reviewed work when the outcome, if it proved my theories right, would cost them millions in compensation."
Yesterday, Sir John Krebs pointedly ignored the online question about his own championing of genetic modification. See relevant Guardian page. (The Food Standards Agency decided not to support the extension of GM labelling to GM derivatives.) EU Food Safety Commissioner David Byrne too, is well-known for pronouncements in favour of GM. Sir John Krebs' surprise appointment as Chair of the FSA in 2000 was justified at the time by David Byrne, who claimed that a prestigious figure was
needed to give the new agency a "dependable reputation". It is interesting to notice the network of those who tend to deny the benefits of small scale or organic produce and whose powerful positions make things easy for the huge food production industry. If scrapie can be shown to have a BSE connection, "livestock numbers" are likely to be even more drastically reduced. Purdey says, "Such extreme measures do little more than remove the superficial evidence of the disease. They merely mislead the public with the illusion that TSE has been controlled - a good vote-catching policy for any government. "
Nov 16 ~ Contamination by GM maize. USDA destroys £1.7 million worth of soya
"The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) announced on Tuesday
Nov. 12 that it quarantined over $2.7 million worth of soya beans
(500 000 bushels) destined for human consumption at a Nebraska
grain elevator after finding parts of ProdiGene's GM maize mixed
with the soya beans. They later ordered their destruction."
See more on this from Friends of the EarthTheir GM campaigner Adrian Bebb said:
" This was an accident waiting to happen. If you grow GM crops
outdoors then they will eventually contaminate the rest of the
food chain. The US authorities have now had to intervene twice to
prevent these unlicensed genes entering the food chain. But how
many incidents have they missed? We are seeking urgent assurances
that food imported into Europe has not been contaminated"
Nov 15 ~"... the bill's real purpose was not just to give officials the blanket power to destroy any animals they wished, without having to give a reason, but to deprive farmers of any right to protest or challenge them." Private Eye
"In the Commons, Labour MPs nodded through this unprecedentedly illiberal piece of legislation without a murmur. But when the bill reached the Lords earlier this year it began to receive the informed scrutiny it deserved, from a cross-party alliance of peers including farmers, like the Countess of Mar, Lord Willoughby de Broke and Labour's Baroness Mallalieu, several outraged Lib Dems, the great Lord Moran, even Tory front bencher Baroness Byford. Lord Whitty blustered away, describing any attempt to stand in the government's way as "reckless" and "irresponsible". But repeatedly amendments to his bill were voted through. Not all the serried ranks of Blair puppets trotting through the lobby in Whitty's support, such as Lord (Melvyn) Bragg, could save him. Three days before the end of the session, it seemed the government had lost so much of what it wanted that it would have to re-introduce the bill from scratch. But, with hours to go, the Commons reversed the Lords' amendments. Dishonour was saved.
The odd thing is that, since the power to dictate animal health policy has been handed over to Brussels, a new directive may soon require important sections of this bizarre act to be amended. So why were ministers so desperate to get it onto the statute book? Was their real motive simply to obscure how far they had been party to one of the most shameless acts of criminality a British government has ever committed?" Muckspreader column
Nov 15 ~ All party Efra Committee publishes its long-awaited "Role of DEFRA" report
The FWi articleby Isabel Davies says, "A DAMNING report by MPs has slated senior civil servants within the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
The report, by the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs select committee, was released on Thursday (14 November).
It says civil servants within the department must embrace new working practices but it voices doubts about the "abilities of management to oversee such a period of change".
The document, called The Role of DEFRA, says the department must put more emphasis on championing rural areas and recognise that it has two principal roles..."
The BBC report says,"Bad management, a lack of focus and confusion about its own role within the department have all contributed to Defra appearing to be "a jack of too many trades and master of none", according to the MPs."
The report itself "The Role of DEFRA" can be browsed here, or downloaded in full (link mended) as a pdf file here (164 pages) or just some key extracts from the summary here.
November 15 ~ Role of Defra"....When asked what was missing from the Action Plan, Sir Brian Follett replied "action" ..."
paragraph 40."Perhaps the most telling criticism of the Department has come from those responsible for inquiring into aspects of the outbreak of Foot and Mouth Disease in 2001. For example, concerns about the slow pace of the Department were reflected by Professor Sir Brian Follett, Chairman of the Royal Society Inquiry into Infectious Diseases in Livestock in his comment on the Action Plan drawn up by DEFRA to deal with the illegal importation of meat. When asked what was missing from the Plan, he replied "action".[94] Even sharper criticism came from Dr Iain Anderson, the Chairman of the 'Lessons Learned' inquiry, in the foreword to his report. In it he said
"Within MAFF, and now DEFRA, I detected a culture predisposed to decision taking by committee with an associated fear of personal risk taking. Such a climate does not encourage creative initiative. It inhibits adaptive behaviour, and organisational learning which, over time, lowers the quality of decisions taken. It seems to me that a reappraisal of prevailing attitudes and behaviours within the Department would be beneficial".[95]
Dr Anderson suggested that the Department should assess the extent to which it needed to "foster abilities in operational management and project management", in addition to existing policy-making skills.[96] He also said that leadership skills should be "husbanded and treasured and developed. In routine, they are always important; in crises they are absolutely essential".[97] Finally he recommended that DEFRA should engage with and learn from its stakeholders or, as he put it, "be guided by very penetrating contact with its customer group".[98]
Key extracts chosen by warmwell
Nov 14 /15 ~ "The BushBlair campaign for pre-emptive action against Iraq appears to be modelled on British government policy during the foot-and-mouth debacle:
better to slaughter them all, just in case some of them have something nasty..."
We liked this paragraph from the Spectator article by Mick Hume, What's worse than a hawk? A dove
: ..and this.."We are all too familiar with the overblown, sixth-form rhetoric of Bush's evil axis' address and the emptiness of Tony Blair's dossier on Saddam (a document so unconvincing that even Estelle Morris would have been hard pushed to award it a pass). But for the truly gormless gems of White House wisdom, one has to look beyond the headlines to the arguments being made in official speeches ..."
The parallels are uncanny. For dossier on Saddam read the vacuous pronouncements against vaccination. For gormless gems, who can forget Mrs Beckett's "something of small triumph" But none of this is funny. In both cases it is all about trying to justify the unjustifiable, making the taking of life seem like rational responsible action.
Nov 14 ~ No fine for France. The £100,000-a-day fine for its illegal
ban on British beef was lost after the case against France collapsed last night.
(See report from EuBusiness.com) "We are extremely disappointed that the EU judicial system is not robust
enough to deal with this matter," commented Ben Gill.
Nov 14 ~ Feakins v. DEFRA
As we reported yesterday, the case will be heard by Mr Justice Goldring in Court 10 of the Royal Courts in The Strand, beginning at 10.30 a.m. (Thursday). It is open to the public.
Nov 14 ~ "At 94 pages it does take some determination to wade through."
Alan Beat has sent us this analysis of the long document from the government in response to the inquiries. ("It is intriguing," says Mr Beat," to compare the various newspaper reports on the government response to the FMD inquiries.... These range from "government humiliation" to "Beckett agrees to vaccinate", neither of which are remotely accurate and leave us wondering if journalists ever bother to read the documents they are reporting to the nation.}
Alan Beat's analysis is long - but highly readable and accurate. He has proved himself an expert in the past two years. His analysis is worth printing out and reading in full and therefore the page opens in a new window.
We draw readers' attention to the passages in blue - and in particular "The Lessons Learned inquiry has absolutely no authority to make recommendations on future control policy. It was set up with no such remit, and without any personnel having expertise in FMD veterinary science. Its purpose was to examine the administrative aspects of the crisis, nothing more, while the parallel Royal Society inquiry examined scientific and veterinary aspects. It is therefore within the Royal Society recommendations that justification for pre-emptive culling must be sought - but none is provided."
Nov 14 ~" DEFRA and the Treasury have their own agenda for animal disease insurance; a proposal that has even been dismissed by those in the insurance industry "
Jim Walker, quoted this week, said,"The Scottish Executive has stressed in its response that animal health is fully devolved to Scottish Ministers.
"Yet on a number of crucial animal health issues, such as the assessment of the impact of the 20-day livestock standstill and future compensation for livestock compulsorily slaughtered, they seem satisfied to let DEFRA take the lead. Livestock movement controls in Scotland are governed by Scottish legislation, and rightly they reflect Scottish conditions. For well over a year now, NFUS has been calling for a Scottish regulatory impact assessment of these controls, considering both the economic and veterinary consequences of the regulations.
...it is simply not good enough for the Executive to be 'represented on a DEFRA led working group'. DEFRA and the Treasury have their own agenda for animal disease insurance; a proposal that has even been dismissed by those in the insurance industry."
We agree. Who will speak up for English farmers in similar robust tones and say that DEFRA's pronouncements are equally inappropriate for English conditions?
Nov 14 ~ I believe the UK's existing FMD Contingency Plan is just more of the same horror canned, ready to be opened like a Pandora's Box.
Bryn Wayt, for all his angry outspokenness, has nevertheless studied the Contingency Plan 2.5 in very careful detail. "Vaccination is given the backseat again with only four small miserable paragraphs and some mention that you will "consider" it, just like Mr Morley did 10 times in about 8 months in 2001.
"This plan shows all the hallmarks of a re-run of shameful FMD 2001 outbreak, with a visible polish on communications and logistics, and a wilful neglect of any Lessons Learned. It is the 2001 animal holocaust all over again, for the same people, in the same jobs, have drawn up the plan. The same Titanic with the same crew. It is inconceivable that you all contemplate the same journey through a FMD crisis."
Nov 13 /14 ~ Animal Disease research. "DEFRA insisted that further work is needed to decide if such a sum is really necessary."
Having admitted today that it "took its eye off the ball" when it failed to meet a deadline for a share of the EU package for fighting animal disease, we now see, with some surprise, that DEFRA is questioning the need for the £ 250 million recommended by the Commons (all-party) Efra Committee to be spent on animal disease research. From the AlphaGalileo Internet press centre
for European science and the arts
"DEFRA evades issue of animal disease funding
The House of Commons environment, food and rural affairs committee has strongly endorsed calls for the government to spend an additional £250 million on animal disease research. But in its response to the recent foot and mouth disease inquiries, issued last week, the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs insisted that further work is needed to decide if such a sum is really necessary."
In the UK there is no government funding for independent research into scrapie and BSE so brilliant but unworldly scientists such as Dr. Alan Dickinson are apparently left to find research funds. 250 MILLION to be spent on research? - but where does it go?
Nov 13 ~
David Lidington: Government asleep on farmers' EU grant
The British Government has asked the European Union for cash to help fight animal diseases such as BSE and scrapie, after a blunder meant it missed the deadline to apply for a share of a 132 million Euro (£84 million) payout. Commenting, David Lidington MP, Shadow Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs said:
"This is dozy incompetence of the highest order. Every other EU country got a share of these funds. Only Britain lost out. And we can't blame Brussels. Our own ministers were asleep.
British farmers have every right to be angry. So do British taxpayers. It's their money that has helped pay for this fund."
Nov 13 ~ Update Feakins v. DEFRA "Could this open the floodgates?"
The case will be heard by Mr Justice Goldring in Court 10 of the Royal Courts in The Strand, beginning at 10.30 a.m. tomorrow (Thursday). It is open to the public. As an emailer wrote this morning, "There must have been hundreds of cases like this - I know of at least 3
locally to me, one with cows up to 15 years old. Could this open the
floodgates?"
We understand that the Ministry's main argument rests on the Animal By-Products
Order - the enabling statute (from the original Animal Health Act 1981)which
does not "bind the Crown". The Secretary of State would appear to believe she is above that law. We wonder what warmwell readers think about this.
Nov 13 ~ DEFRA's failure to secure UK's share of £84 million EU animal disease fund due to "an oversight"
As we reported on October 25, on 18 October 2002 Commission approved 132 million euro package to fight animal diseases
"...All Member States, with the exception of the United Kingdom, submitted the Commission their programmes for these different tests..."
The Scotsman today gives Ross Finnie's response to all this.
" Applications for EU surveillance funding for
transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSE) were made at member state
level through DEFRA, which took the lead responsibility on behalf of UK
agriculture departments......
An Executive spokeswoman said it was regrettable the initial deadline for
applications had been missed but pointed out that efforts were being made to
have a late UK application accepted."
In a statement that really does take the biscuit for impudence, a spokesman for DEFRA apparently said its failure to get the application in by the 1
June deadline was "an oversight by officials who had been engaged in intense
activity over the past year." If only the intense activity had been responsible action on behalf of the UK instead of the sort of frenzied back-covering, dodging and weaving we appear to have witnessed in the past months. Activity is not at all the same thing as achievement.
Nov 13 ~ "The issue for Thursday's case is to establish what is "the lawful means of disposal" of pyre ash at Mr Robin Feakins' farm."
A court case against the ever unrepentant DEFRA, necessarily of great interest for all concerned farmers, will begin tomorrow.
MAFF/DEFRA burned thousands of slaughtered animals on Mr Feakins' farm. Only then was it realised that some of the cattle had been over 5 years old. Pyre ash from these cows, which must be regarded as constituting a BSE risk, was mixed indiscriminately into vast piles of ash and debris at the farm. DEFRA say they can take it to landfill; Mr Feakins and his lawyers say that under UK and EU law it has to go for incineration. Either way, the cost will run into millions of pounds. This is a discrete case from that to be brought next year against DEFRA about the unuseable and uncleaned state in which the Feakins farm has been left since early 2001.
This was a case that had to be postponed since DEFRA presented the judge and Mr Feakins' lawyers with 2 thick files of papers just one day before it was originally due to start. Details will be posted later today about which Admin Court and under which judge the case will be heard tomorrow. It will be open to the public.
Nov 13 ~ Thailand, with whom the UK government has just agreed an arms for agricultural products trade agreement, has been asked to certify there is no FMD on their pig farms.
We note in some alarm from this news item from Bangkok Nov 12: "Only 70 farms had been certified by the Livestock Development Department as meeting standards for the production of hygienic pork, said Nopalit Sermsaksasithorn, the president of the National Swine Raisers' Association.
..of the 10 million pigs raised this year, about
3% more than last year, only between 10% and 20% were from farms that met
the standards...Singapore is reluctant to import Thai pork and has asked Thailand to certify that there is no foot and mouth disease in pig farms."
It will be remembered that a deal was done on October 18th by which, "Britain has signed a counter trade agreement under which it will promote sales of Thai agricultural produce in return for supplying weapons to the military."
In the article from the WMN, which took up the story from warmwell about the Thailand deal, we read:
"Angela Browning, Conservative MP for Tiverton and Honiton and former
farming minister, said there were "real concerns" about the health and
welfare standards of meat, particularly Thai chicken."
Meanwhile, David Lidington has promised to table some questions about the deal. Received this morning
"Ref the arms for food 'piece' on your website," writes Bryn in a lengthy, well-documented email,
.
"I thought you would like to see that in exchange for arms we are going to get meat vaccinated against FMDv from Thailand....if this report from the OIE dating back to February 1997 is anything to go by
...thanks to immunisation of animals with vaccines produced in Asia (a new vaccine laboratory is being built in Thailand) or imported from Europe...
It is worthy of note that FIVE years ago SE Asia was using "new diagnostic techniques" which could tell the difference between vaccinated and infected animals..............makes nonsense of the lies that drop from the mouths of our government and what they think they have as best scientific advice
..."
Nov 13 ~ sheep, pig and cattle producers are being phased out as a matter of global policy?
From the animalscience.com Newsletter
October 31
" (There is ) a 'meat revolution' occurring
in developing countries. It is predicted that by 2025 most of the meat and
milk will be produced in the developing world, and the largest growth animal
production is predicted to be in poultry followed by pigs. Currently,
livestock and animal products are, in value, the largest sector in
international food. Also, to support this increase in animal production, the
fastest growing agricultural commodity is animal feed grains. A picture is
emerging of highly integrated global trade with mainly developed countries
exporting feed grains and the developing countries exporting meat and meat
products. .."
So, it looks as though UK grain producers may thrive but that sheep, pig and cattle producers are being phased out as a matter of global policy. Chris Bradford, co-ordinator of the Rural Development Agency's Buy Local
programme, quoted in the WMN article (above) à propos the trade agreement with Thailand, make a relevant comment: "We are getting all this talk about promoting local
produce as a way forward and then the Government turns its back on us,
promoting the sale of foreign food at such a costly expense. What can we
understand of this?"
Nov 12 ~ Wales: 80% of farmers earned an average of £2,900 in the last financial year.
We read in today's Western Mail that hill farmers in Wales - 80 percent of all farmers in the country - had an average income of £2,900 in the last financial year.
"People in the cities say farmers are lucky to live in the countryside and they are correct, but you need something to live on. When talking about countryside and farming you cannot separate the two, you can't have one without the other ," said an NFU spokeswoman.
A conference entitled A New Future for Rural Communities will be held at the Pavilion in Llandrindod Wells between 10am and 4pm.
It will be chaired by Michael Jones, chairman of the Powys Rural Support Network. Speakers will include Peter Midmore, professor of applied economics at Aberystwyth University, Newport AM John Griffiths, Brecon and Radnorshire MP Roger Williams and Mark Field from the Co-operative Group.
Nov 12 ~ "On scrapie, the Act includes enabling powers, which would provide for the acceleration of the National Scrapie Plan..."
"... by requiring all sheep to be genotyped and those found not to have a genotype providing resistance to scrapie to be slaughtered, castrated or sterilised."
The Newcastle Journal in its article entitled New power of entry 'will be a last resort' includes, among its simple description of the new powers of entry for animal disease, this casual reference to one of the even more sinister aspects of the Animal Health Bill. The AHB has now received the Royal Assent and it looks very much as though the National Scrapie Plan will be forced upon us all very soon in spite of the fact that the leading authority on scrapie, Professor Alan Dickinson, who has studied the condition fo 50 years is known to be astonished by the ill-advised and scientifically unfounded scheme.
Dr Alan Dickinson, in a letter to the now defunct Select Committee on Agriculture, raises the issues of MAFF's insistence on being exclusively in charge during the BSE crisis, feigned "consultation" over MAFF's National Scrapie Plan, and the scientific flaws inherent in such a plan. (See Prof Dickinson's letter)
Britain (and Europe) is likely to find its rare breeds snatched away by the NSP - with all the implications for the gene pool that this will involve - for a political idea not a scientific one.
Nov 12 ~ Sir John Krebs, the Food Standards Agency and the National Scrapie Plan
Sir John Krebs has agreed to answer questions on line at the Guardian's talk board on the 14th of November. 1 30p.m. You need to register and get a user name to take part but may submit questions in advance for consideration. It will be interesting to see if anything controversial is allowed. (http://www.guardian.co.uk/talk/0,1247,546387,00.html)
Nov 12 ~ "The National Sheep Association know of my long-standing concern about the often unfounded speculations that have been damaging to their industry during the last decade." (Dr Alan Dickinson)
" Late last year, (i.e. 2000) I was shown a copy of the glossy MAFF booklet dealing with the scheme aimed to eradicate scrapie from British sheep by breeding from rams carrying a particular version of the gene which codes for the PrP protein. As I had done the pre-molecular groundwork for this, by 20 years of selecting sheep genetically for some variants of this gene, I am in a position to understand the potential complications. Indeed, it was long realised that the notion of a version of the gene that would "resist" all known (and future) strains of TSEs, may not be realistic.
This was underlined by the fact that in 10 years of searching for a strain of scrapie agent that could break such a barrier, I had been lucky enough to find one, with approximately this property. Furthermore, this finding was not a surprise because the work with scrapie in mice had taught me to avoid the notion of genetic "resistance" to TSEs: this complication is fundamental to understanding of the whole subject and is widely unrecognised, for example on occasion by leading members of SEAC."
Nov 11-12 ~ Cumbria likely to lose millions in regeneration money because of red tape
Published in The News and Star on 11/11/2002
" CUMBRIA'S most deprived communities could lose millions of pounds of European cash which is lying unspent.
Only one third of £30million set aside for six major initiatives in needy rural and urban areas has been lined up for specific projects.
And just a small fraction of that has actually been spent.
Government officials blame a lack of people on the ground to draw up Cumbria's bids for the cash, and a lack of "tangible proposals, but some who are close to the bidding process say the red tape involved is "horrendous".
Leaders of each initiative have now been given less than a year to spend the money - or lose 60 per cent of it.
Initiatives now at risk include one strand of a foot and mouth rural rescue plan which Cumbria County Council claimed would create or save 1,200 jobs..." (more)
It is all as we feared. "Aid" has a nasty habit of never getting to its destination because there is always so much "red tape". As an emailer says today, "Why make it easy to deliver when you can hang on to the money longer? They probably pocket the interest its making by making it so very difficult to get hold of that most people give up in the end. And this doesn't just affect Cumbria of course."
Nov 11-12 ~ A Science Park for Throckmorton. Peter Luff says residents must be consulted
This is Birmingham site reports today: "Local MP Peter Luff (Con Mid Worcestershire) said residents must be consulted over the plans but admitted that a science park was likely to be welcomed.
He said firm plans would also help the housing market in the area, which had drastically slumped during the uncertainty of the last ten months.
The former airfield, part of which was used to bury thousands of carcasses during the foot-and-mouth crisis, will be subject to an independent review commissioned by the Government following residents fears over health concerns.
Meanwhile, villagers who raised thousands of pounds for a fighting fund in their battle over the asylum seeker centre said the parish councils would hold a meeting to decide what to do with the money now."
Nov 11 ~ "Cumbria County Council could find itself in the extraordinary position of taking the government to court over a bad debt."
Channel Four News last night
"....Cumbria County Council said it did not want to be interviewed by Channel Four News for fear of prejudicing any future legal action. The Council leader says that the sums under challenge here run into millions of pounds under a fundamental challenge to the contract agreement...CCC are not alone in believing that DEFRA are trying to renegotiate contracts. According to the government's own figures the 100 biggest contractors are still owed more than 70 million pounds..Many say they are facing bankruptcy and are also considering legal action. ..."
"...like Cumbria County Council, the (Northumberland and Durham machinery )Ring was worried by the consequences of being interviewed by Channel Four News. But, in a news letter to members, the Ring's manager says that DEFRA's demands for documentation have now gone far beyond normal commercial requirements. "Why?" he asks. "To reduce the costs of Foot and Mouth to suit a political purpose? Or maybe it is to reduce the actual costs so that the Treasury gains and we all lose."
"DEFRA denies any such intent. It says its goal is to achieve value for money and says its overriding objective is to protect the taxpayer interest..."
(warmwell transcript of last night's item on Channel Four News)
Nov 11 ~"I feel that I must reply to the ridiculous comments by the MLC concerning the sell by date of meat and in particular beef..."
A comment received in reply to the story from Lawrence about the Meat and Livestock Commission's pamphlet
"At work we hang beef for at least two weeks. All our beef is Welsh Black Organic and to suggest that any beef, in particular a steak, would be edible and past its sell by date 10 days after slaughter is beyond belief .... Let's assume it is three weeks before Christmas this year and ASDA place on order for sirloin/rump and fillet steaks. The steaks are to be delivered in the week prior to the holiday - but are for sale after Xmas and the New Year. The law permits the supermarket and/or abattoir/packing plant to add 56 DAYS to the life of the steak from the date of slaughter. If this did not occur the supermarkets would have no fresh meat for sale after the Xmas holidays. The beef sold to supermarkets has not been 'hung' but due to the packaging has 'matured'. Meat is hung in order for the muscles to relax thus making the meat tender. A tough steak is the result of either a distressed animal at slaughter or meat eaten when it is too 'fresh'. This also applies to lamb and pork...."
." (see full email)
Nov 11 ~ They withstood a siege. We supported them. And out of that victory the frail resistance to the government's farming policy was born.
Hilary sends part 7 of her real food and farming diary. "At Oaklands in the Forest of Dean, they have a flock of sheep, a herd of cows, fruit trees, a kitchen garden. They produce enough to feed themselves (more than 100 of them) and sell the surplus. There is also a weavery, so the sheeps' wool is valued...
So when the sheep all round them had Foot and Mouth and the authorities wanted to slaughter their healthy animals, it wasn't just their cows and sheep that were threatened, though that was awful enough. It was their whole way of life.
They withstood a siege. We supported them. And out of that victory the frail resistance to the government's farming policy was born.
The problem for us, the resistance, is how to talk meaningfully about farming to the great urban public who sit in their tower blocks and get fed, or to policy makers who see farming in terms of industry.
As a society, we see farming only in terms of profit. This is not the only way to see it. Oaklands works as a whole. The fact that they produce more food than they need is incidental. Is there any message here for the rest of us?.." See Hilary's latest extracts
Nov 11 ~ EU FMD report under threat from "compromise" amendments
We have been informed that Caroline Lucas MEP (Green party) has had "a number of meetings with other members of the Foot
an Mouth Committee to try and defeat a number of hostile amendments
to the draft report. The report will be voted on on 18 November and
the current situation is that a number of the 273 original amendments
have been merged into 10 "compromise" amendments, some of which are
not satisfactory. Caroline has therefore been meeting with other
members of the Committee to ensure that the good amendments,
including the 60 or so tabled by Caroline, are voted through and
those amendments that would weaken the report are rejected."
It was to be expected that the good sense of the EU draft document would be viciously attacked by those who feel that its recommendations are a public rebuke. We will be watching this with grave interest.
Nov 11 ~ "The 20-day rule made sense in the period after infection but now it's been used to force the small family farm out of business and create the Government's vision of large unsustainable farming units."
(Plaid Cymru's Simon Thomas reported in the Western Mail on Nov 7) Mrs Beckett was reported to have said, " Farmers had to bear some responsibility for "minimising dis-ease risks", she added as she confirmed that the controversial 20-day movement ban would remain in place until a detailed risk assessment had been completed.
Shadow Environment Secretary David Lidington said the rule was having a disastrous effect on livestock farmers who faced "breaking the law or obeying the law and risk going out of business entirely."
Nov 11 ~ Yet more spin against farmers in The Independent on Sunday
We read with disquiet in the usually sensible Independent under the headline: Ministers wrong on foot and mouth
: "Farmers deliberately underfed livestock during the foot and mouth crisis so
as to be able to claim special compensation for suffering animals, the
Government now believes." .....and note the position at the end of the paragraph of the word "believes". The government believes it, do they? And the Independent prints this story as if farmers en masse have been tried, convicted and universally condemned?
The article continues: "One of the inquiries, by Dr Iain Anderson, repeated reports that "some
farmers took advantage of the scheme and disposed of healthy animals"....". Repeating reports that "some" farmers behaved irresponsibly does not mean that more than one or two did. The end of the article reveals that it was the RSPCA... "which investigated the scheme for the Government"
We are very concerned about the implication, unsubstantiated in any way, that farmers were to blame for the unnecessary deaths of their animals. As we all remember only too vividly, vets and farmers, distressed by the knowledge that animals were suffering and ewes were lambing in liquid mud were unable to get any sense out of the officials. Panicky measures forbidding contact and humane movement are now known to have been as unnecessary as they were unreasonable. The Countess of Mar said on Thursday, ".. a great injustice has been done to many people in the agricultural community and must be righted."
Public realisation of the corruption in the SVS, the waste of millions of pounds and the cruel, unnecessary and scientifically phony policies must, it seems, at all costs be deflected. Such articles are mere propaganda. Roger Windsor's speech below tells us the real story.
Nov 11 ~ Because of MAFF action, animals were kept in conditions, for which, under normal circumstances, the farmer would have been prosecuted....
Roger Windsor (MBE. MA (Cantab), BSc (Edin) BVM&S, MRCVS) in a speech, read on his behalf, to the Central Veterinary Society "..MAFF decided to follow EU advice and stuck to 3 km which more than doubled the number of animals that were killed... Roy Anderson should be called, not the Professor of Epidemiology, but the Professor of Extermination at Imperial College, London. I understand that he subsequently revised his model and came to the conclusion that the virus travelled no more than 500 metres. Too many animals ... were killed in the name of elections and mathematics. .."
"We have had rodeos on farms, with marksmen shooting animals running round in a field, ewes lambing as they were rounded up for slaughter. ....
Doors were broken down by police.
On a lesser note it was common for vets to be sent to visit farms where all the animals had been slaughtered.
Vets arrived on farms in time to meet other vets. just leaving.
It is difficult to believe that MAFF were so panicked that they required one vet. to supervise the simultaneous slaughter of animals on ten farms. The vets. in Newcastle refused to do it. It was a great pity that RCVS did not show the same spirit!
Animal welfare was completely ignored - farms with no food, not even straw were not allowed to move anything.
Cattle and sheep had to calve and lamb miles away from the care of the farmer because all movement was prohibited.
As the toll mounted, so did the panic. "
See Speech
Nov 11 ~ "The field was just like a blancmange, with green pus oozing out of the soil."
The Snowie Group of Companies, which owns Northern Hydroseeding, denies any link between its operations and health problems - but this article in Saturday's Independent is alarming.
"... Villagers have set up an action group to press the Scottish Parliament to change the law on organic waste. Under present guidelines, that can include sewage sludge, blood and gut material from abattoirs, distillery waste, paper waste, septic-tank contents and animal manure.
European legislation stopped the dumping of effluent at sea. Authorities decided spreading sewage sludge on agricultural land was the best environmental option. ..."It is frightening when you consider the amount of chemicals and hormones and medicine which get flushed into the sewage system every day, and which are now being injected into the land from which we grow our food. Many other countries, including Holland, already ban it" ..."The standards that govern using treated sewage on soil are based on outdated science. The UK is out of step with modern international practice. It appears the cheapest option of waste disposal has been chosen over health concerns. Maybe now, somebody will listen."
Nov 11 ~ "Clearly the Meat and Livestock Commission intends to level the playing field for these unfortunate Supermarkets...."
Lawrence has drawn our attention to an MLC leaflet containing the advice that "The shelf life of beef is determined by the method of packaging used. If cuts are going to be displayed for sale in a farm shop then they should be maintained at temperatures below 4 C and ideally sold and consumed within 7 to 10 days of slaughter." The leaflets on lamb and pork contained the same words.
Lawrence asked how the advice could be reconciled with the need to hang the beef. ...and was told, "the 7 to 10 days meant after the hanging..."
So how did the 'experts' make such a careless mistake - in a leaflet that consumers and those who organise Farmers' Markets [and EHOs?] might use for reference?
Lawrence says, "I believe that the massive throughput meat factory/abattoirs that supply the supermarkets, have to rush the carcasses through because they don't have the massive hanging space that is needed. They probably do aim to sell their meat within 7 to 10 days of slaughter. They try to compensate by giving the carcasses electric shocks and plying them with gas - and turn out tough textured cardboard which looks bright red in the display cabinets. Clearly the MLC intends to level the playing field for these unfortunate Supermarkets by exhorting those selling in Farmers' Markets to produce meat of equally low quality.
Nov 8 - 9 ~ No compensation after all for Widdrington and Tow Law
The Newcastle Journal writes,"..The announcement came as a blow, if not a major surprise, to people in Widdrington, Northumberland, and Tow Law, County Durham, who had to endure
the stench and disruption caused by huge numbers of carcases being dumped on
their doorsteps....
Peter Lister, a member of the residents' liaison committee at Tow
Law, where more than 30,000 carcases were buried, said: "We have ended up
with a site that cost £15m and caused untold misery to the local community
and yet we are getting nothing in compensation.
...The Anderson report clearly recommended that areas like ours should receive
funds but this response is just what we would have expected from the
Government, given their handling of foot-and-mouth." See Journal article Fury
over cash snub to pyre villages and the article in the same paper almost exactly one year ago: Left to bear the scars for decades to come.
Defra must be getting increasingly nervous about claims for compensation. So many claims for huge amounts are gathering in the wings. We suspect that this nightmare for the government is not over yet in spite of all their skilful dodging, weaving and refusal to acknowledge responsibility.
Nov 8 ~ we reflect that the Ministry went around merrily slaughtering perfectly healthy animals without either a legal or scientific basis for doing so until the case of MAFF v. Upton.
Richard Bacon (MP for South Norfolk) spoke last night " At that point, the court had the full scientific information before it and MAFF stopped doing what it was doing and did not contest the action any further. That suggested that it had been wrong all along. The Minister did not address that point yesterday.
That brings me to my next point. The Minister is determined to avoid the creation of novel legal principles, but the creation of a situation in which the Government go into a magistrates court and effectively bat for both sides - they make the case for a warrant while carrying statements from the farmer saying why there should not be a warrant - will be nothing other than a novel legal principle. The Government will bat for both sides, but the farmer will not be allowed to act in his own interest or have a solicitor acting for him. That seems to be a novel principle.
However, it would be wrong to be graceless. My hon. Friend the Member for South Holland and The Deepings assures me that we have achieved a valuable victory, and if he is right, that can only be due to the work of the fine and noble Baroness Byford who is probably the heroine of the hour. "
We agree with Mr Bacon and are equally grateful to others who spoke, in particular Andrew George (MP for St Ives) whose contribution may also be seen in last night's debate in the Commons now on warmwell
Nov 8 ~ "Science has moved forward by leaps and bounds.." The Noble Countess sums it all up.
Again and again we notice the wisdom and humanity of the Countess of Mar in her speeches to the House of Lords. Yesterday she summed up our own feelings in a nutshell:
"... I do not need to repeat all the details of the horrors that arose in the last epidemic of foot and mouth disease. We have heard them often enough. I ask noble Lords to look forward and to make provision for the protection of our livestock and agricultural industry on the basis of the lessons that we have learned from the events of 2001.
I can understand that when the Bill was first published, Ministers believed that the epidemic had got out of hand because they did not have the powers to enter premises and slaughter animals as and when they wished. In the year since publication we have had three official reports and several county reports, all of which have been extremely critical of the ruthless and inefficient policy of mass slaughter.
Those facts are still very much at the forefront of the memories of the British population, and particularly of the rural population. They still feel very sore.
Science has moved forward by leaps and bounds and vaccination is now much more important than it was a year ago. I recognise the willingness of the Government, who have put in an amendment of their own. Noble Lords have fought long and hard to gain that concession, although I am disappointed that they have chosen to place their amendment at the end of the Bill, in Part 4. I would like to see vaccination come first to the mind of the Secretary of State. I do not read books from back to front and I do not expect those who will have to implement the measures laid out in this Bill to do so either. ..." See the whole Lords debate yesterday, now on warmwell
Nov 8 ~ This should not be a Bill about slaughter with a tip of the cap towards vaccination late on in the Bill..."
Lord Willoughby de Broke:
" ..... ..It is disappointing after all that that although the Government have swallowed the camel of vaccination they are still straining at the gnat of where it should go in the Bill.
The Bill as it stands is still a slaughter Bill. The amendment on vaccination will appear on page 9 of the Bill, before the clauses entitled Commencement, Finance, Extent and Short Title. We are dealing with vaccination. As the noble Countess has pointed out, every report dealing with the foot and mouth epidemic has recommended vaccination. We still await the formal report of the European Union committee, which no doubt-I think that the leaks we have had indicate this-will indicate that vaccination should be the priority. Vaccination should be "considered"-I believe that is the right term to use -early on in the Bill. This should not be a Bill about slaughter with a tip of the cap towards vaccination late on in the Bill. It should be dealt with early on and be given clear priority. "
Nov 8 ~".. a great injustice has been done to many people in the agricultural community and must be righted"
In graciously withdrawing her own amendment , the Countess of Mar said, "I am grateful to all noble Lords who took part in the debate, and I am humbled by the comments made about my participation. I acted from a sense of conviction and from a feeling that a great injustice has been done to many people in the agricultural community and must be righted" but in support of another she said,"....hundreds of farms were culled out when there was no disease present. The farmers were aware of the situation, but had no means by which they could gain redress at that time." Similarly, Lord Willoughby de Broke " : My Lords, the noble Lord (Lord Whitty) gives us no reassurance on the implementation of appeals through the DVM. As my noble friend Lady Byford pointed out, however, the majority of those successful appeals were carried out after the Government had lost the Upton case - the Grunty the Pig case. Prior to that, most of those appeals were dismissed. It was only after that that the DVM realised that it had no grounds for upholding continuation of the contiguous cull." We are so grateful to these noble peers for their tireless efforts in getting some measure of humanity back into the bill. (whole Lords debate)
Nov 8 ~ "They see this as a
memorial.'"
So Great Orton really is to become a nature reserve. The Guardian today reports in cheerful vein, ( "Nature casts spell over site of slaughter.....") but the unease and distress of the local residents and farmers is still apparent as is fitting for a site where thousands and thousands of healthy, uninfected animals were slaughtered as fast as the piece-rate paid killers could go. This is an English Holocaust site and changing its name to Watchtree, waxing lyrical about hares, newts and birds and sententiously telling the Guardian "We got
this feeling for a nature reserve"- none of that will dissipate the feelings that continue to haunt so many of us : "......I don't think any of us would choose to have that site near us," Ms
Macdonald said. "We are stuck with it. I am as happy with what as has been
planned as I can be in the circumstances." And that - all the DEFRA self-congratulation notwithstanding - would seem to sum up the stoical view of the Cumbrians who live there. We can only admire them yet again.
Nov 8 ~ The Animal Health Bill did go through at the very last minute
But our Westminster correspondent comments cheerfully that there were, " so many amendments that it is a completely different Bill. The Commons, we suspect, did not notice that. Not ideal but about a hundred times better. In any case, when the directive comes out we shall start all over again, for that is our real legislation."
The Guardian report this morning: "the government was forced to allow farmers facing
compulsory slaughter of healthy animals the right to appeal to a magistrate
and to give a higher priority to vaccination."
Nov 8 ~ A third type of slaughter policy is proposed in the Animal Health Bill.
This is culling "to prevent the spread of disease", e.g. to create a firebreak'.
A glance through the government's so-called "Decision Tree Consultation paper" (now on warmwell) will show that nothing appears to have been learned at all. All the old myths and misinformation inform these DEFRA strategies.
Extracts:
....In some circumstances culling additional to DCs and IPs maybe the optimal
solution based on a risk assessment. This culling could take a number of
forms - contiguous premises (where these are judged to have been exposed
to infection) or preventive culling where scientific and veterinary advice is that
this will prevent further spread of disease outwith the area. In choosing
between these and other additional forms of culling a number of factors will
need to be taken into account:...." There are evident tacit requests for increased resources for DEFRA - and lip service paid to vaccination to live - but no clarity of strategy based on the current scientific thinking of the Royal Society and the real experts. It is hoped that warmwell will receive some informed comment about this paper...which fills us with deep gloom about the calibre of mind that prepared it.
Nov 8 ~ In Uruguay after vaccination (29th April 2001) NO MORE ANIMALS WERE KILLED.
"Clinically affected and in-contact animals (including sheep and goats) are neither slaughtered nor vaccinated until the last sick animal has recovered". Captain Bryn Wayt has responded to Lord Whitty's words in the House of Lords yesterday: "animals would need to be slaughtered where they had come into contact with infected livestock.
Culling might also be necessary if there was a shortage of vaccines, or other logistical problems, he said....... there might be other slaughter scenarios, adding: "That's why we sought wider powers in terms of pre-emptive cull in this bill."
Capt Wayt asks, "..."Come into contact" what exactly does that mean ?.......nose to nose?....in the next field downwind/upwind?......or 3km away ?" and asks what logistical problems are now being foreseen that were not before? "Not that 220 vets in the field stuff again ? Can I just remind you, the farmers down there in Uruguay did the vaccinating themselves last year...........makes your logistical problems excuse as thin as the apologies your mob have given the British people who have suffered during and after FMD 2001." Read Captain Wayt's (robustly expressed) message
Nov 8 ~ "...ministers tacitly admitted they had done virtually everything wrong in their attempts to control the disease."
The Newcastle Journal has put a brave face on the proceedings in Parliament over the past two days. "In a statement to MPs yesterday, Mrs Beckett said the Government accepted "virtually all" Dr Anderson's recommendations and endorses the lessons which he drew in his report. (warmwell notes the politician's use of the useful word "virtually")
Flanked by an impassive Mr Brown, she repeated her earlier admission that mistakes had been made in the handling of the crisis, which cost the rural economy £8bn.
But asked by Tory MP Peter Ainsworth whether she should say sorry on behalf of the Government for its mishandling of the epidemic, she stopped short of an apology....."See Journal report. See also the report in the Independent about the passing of the Asylum Bill "..Oliver Letwin, the shadow Home Secretary, dropped Tory objections to opening huge accommodation centres in rural areas after powers were given to an official monitor to comment on whether their location was suitable."
Nov 7 ~ Lord Greaves hailed the government concessions in the bill
as a "substantial victory" for the Lords.
The BBC report tonight predictably chooses to use words such as "backed down", " climbdown" and "defeat" - but even they could not hide the fact that ... "the bill has returned to the Commons again after peers defeated the
government by saying farmers should be able to appeal to a magistrate if
inspectors planned to enter their premises during a disease outbreak."
"Vaccination would now have to be considered before slaughter in any future
foot-and-mouth outbreak"
The bill will, no doubt, squeeze through right at the end of the eleventh hour of the session - but vaccination as an issue has been highlighted and the government will not dare to ignore it again as they did so disastrously last year.
Nov 7 ~ EU Temporary Committee met today to consider "compromise" amendments
See their website" 7 November 2002
Theme : Second dicussion on the amendments and possibly compromise
amendments
Time : 14.00 - 17.30
Venue : European Parliament, Brussels
18 November 2002
Theme : Vote in the Committee
Time : 17.30 - 19.00
Venue : European Parliament, Strasbourg
DECEMBER PART SESSION, 16 - 19 DECEMBER
VOTE IN PLENARY"
We shall be watching this carefully and will report as soon as possible.
Nov 7 ~"If blame there is, that is where it lies..."
Mrs. Angela Browning (Tiverton and Honiton) asked Mrs Beckett yesterday: " Now that the right hon. Lady has had a chance to study the reports that she commissioned, what, in her judgment, was the cause of last year's outbreak?"
The reply?
Margaret Beckett:" Someone acted illegally in importing diseased meat and someone else acted illegally in not reporting the incidence of foot and mouth disease and in allowing movement, which meant that the disease was spread. If blame there is, that is where it lies. "
This would appear to be Mrs Beckett's view - and the government view all along. Someone else was to blame. Someone else was responsible for the utter misery caused - not by the disease itself but by the cure for the disease. Peter Ainsworth had one final shot at getting some sort of acknowledgement from the government: "Given the criticisms contained in the Anderson report in particular and the flurry of activity that it has engendered, does she still maintain, as she once said, that the Government's response to foot and mouth had been a minor triumph? Or will she take possibly the last opportunity--that I will offer her anyway--to apologise and say sorry for the trauma of foot and mouth?"
Her reply was
as predictable as it was wholly unsatisfactory. Read extracts from yesterday's Foot and Mouth Disease Inquiry Reports statement and debate here. Note the references to vaccination, to the new powers given to Customs and Excise, the 20 day rule and the gem about Lord Whitty breaking DEFRA's rules on bio-security - which drew a tight-lipped and angry response from Mrs Beckett.
Nov 7 ~ The House of Lords sends the Animal Health Bill bill back to the Commons.
The last amendment is back with the House of Commons. We can only thank the House of Lords yet again for their sterling efforts to make humane and logical changes. It is patently irresponsible to pass legislation drafted in a panic of self justification that does not have reference to current advances in rapid diagnosis, testing and vaccination, and which makes no reference to what is happening elsewhere in countries where state of the art science is taken into consideration and stakeholders - ie people with a real stake in the policies - are listened to and considered carefully.
An emailer writes :
"It seems that following the Lords amendments and possible consideration of various submissions the drafting office feels it has to respond to the changes since the Bill's introduction. - but haven't a clue how to draft the legislation to reflect them - hence thse last minute - inept - amendments.
With the plethora of material pouring out of DEFRA yesterday, Contingency Plan, Response to Inquiries, etc Decison trees(sic) why on earth are they pressing on with a bill that is so hopelessly at variance with the EU, the OIE and scientific development?" We couldn't agree more. See yesterday's debate in full
Nov 7 ~ The CLA says:The 20-day standstill is putting an intolerable burden on livestock farming.
The CLA's press release yesterday, commenting on the Government response to the Inquiries includes the following:
On vaccination:
The Government must clearly demonstrate its commitment to the introduction
of an effective and practicable emergency vaccination procedure, agreed
across the EU, with a reliable means of distinguishing vaccinated from
infected animals, so that we will never again face a mass livestock cull on
the scale of 2001.
On the 20-day standstill rule:
The 20-day standstill is putting an intolerable burden on livestock farming.
We urge the Government to act without delay on the veterinary and cost
benefit assessments expected at the end of this month.
Read news release
Nov 6 ~"our insistence on the flexibility proposed in the Animal Health Bill and in the Lessons Learned report to allow for pre-emptive culling...." Mrs Beckett's Statement
News release today: "Margaret Beckett today made a statement to Parliament on the government's response to the reports of the official foot and mouth inquiries.
The latest version of the government's contingency plan for dealing with any future outbreak has been put on the Defra website today. The plan takes into account recommendations from the inquiries."
Click here for the pdf file of the government's response to the FMD Inquiries (94 pages)
And Mrs Beckett's statement - in which no mention is made of the rapid diagnostic tests that will be used elsewhere, particularly in the US, to combat FMD at source and prevent the necessity of much killing. Her statement still makes much of the possible need for "pre-emptive culling" i.e. no condemnation of the disastrous and unnecessary contiguous cull has been allowed.. (See FWi article on how the papers responded to this)
Nov 6 ~ "The Government has accepted the advice that the 20 day standstill rules should remain in place.."
Extracts from Mrs Beckett's Statement
"The Government has accepted the advice that the 20 day standstill rules should remain in place until a detailed risk assessment and wide ranging cost benefit analysis had been completed. .....the basic strategy in all FMD-free countries is that, as a first step, animals infected with FMD and animals which have had contact with them have to be culled. But what both Inquiries are saying, and what the Government accepts, is that in some circumstances, additional action may be needed to control an outbreak; and in that case, emergency vaccination will form part of the control strategy from the start, and this would be emergency vaccination to live, provided of course that scientific and veterinary advice is that this would be the most effective course. ..
....the Government is committed to tackling these issues, in consultation with interested parties, with the aim of being in a position to trigger an emergency vaccination campaign should the need arise. But the issues are substantial and this process will take some time to complete.
....
....this does not mean that wider culling strategies will never again be needed. We must maintain a full armoury of weapons to tackle these diseases; hence our insistence on the flexibility proposed in the Animal Health Bill and in the Lessons Learned report to allow for pre-emptive culling....."
Nov 6 ~ Animal Health Bill (Programme (No. 2) Motion) (without debate).
Animal Health Bill: Lords Amendments (for up to 6 hours).
The debate will take place after 3.30 this afternoon. Live broadcasting of the House of Commons begins at 2.30 p.m. today and may be viewed here (Use the right mouse button if you would rather view this webcam page in a new window)
Nov 6 ~ Update on Throckmorton
Throckmorton in Worcestershire, it will be remembered, is a place which sums up the bizarre and undemocratic state into which we have fallen. The Times today: "MINISTERS have abandoned plans to build an accommodation centre for 750
asylum-seekers in a hamlet in Worcestershire, in an effort to save the
Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Bill.
Beverley Hughes, the Immigration Minister, announced the move yesterday
after protests by residents who claimed that the area was unsuitable for
asylum-seekers. Difficulties over access to the site and acquiring land
forced ministers to drop the site, one of three chosen for pilot centres."
So, once again, Throckmorton becomes a pawn in the game of politics. At least this time the move will be welcomed by the residents - but they will be under no illusions that their protests were the reason for this volte-face.
Nov 6 ~"British farmers are NOT overproducing"
David writes today, "British farmers are NOT overproducing in most sectors because we
still import about 50% of the Nation's food requirements. For those sectors
controlled by EU quotas, there is little hope of supplying our own market
which has effectively been given to other EU countries.....Recent WTO rules and liberalisation of trade has made an EEC obsolete. The
EU would still be keen to export their surpluses to us but we would not have
to support the production of those surpluses. Instead, we could help less
developed and some of the poorer Commonwealth countries by trading with
them, as we did prior to entering the EEC. The reason for sacrificing 25
democratic/ sovereign parliaments by breaking their countries up into silly
little regions, controlled from Brussels, is for the benefit of politicians
and EUrocrats. (see David's full message to an internet forum)
Nov 6 ~"Yes, we will vote against the government's moves to overturn the Lords..but I fear it will make little difference"
The Animal Health Bill returns to the House of Commons today. It is all too likely that the government will try to overturn those logical, sensible, practical and ethical amendments passed in the House of Lords that would give some measure of protection against the provisions of the Bill. These amendments give priority to vaccination-to-live over slaughter, require available diagnostic tests to be used, and restore some measure of common sense to the 20 day rule.
However, one MP replied to the message sent urging him to support the amendments as follows: "Yes we will vote against the Government's moves to overturn the Lords on this, but given their huge majority in the Commons I fear it will make little difference. From what I can gather, the Lords do not intend to vote the whole bill down over this when it comes to the crunch on Thursday. So regrettably, they will probably get their way. I'm sorry not to be the bearer of brighter forecasts!"
This is UK politics today. The bill, if passed, will show us once and for all that legislation is no longer primarily about good government to protect society but about the powerful forces of centralisation using rules and regulations to protect and increase centralised power. Like the MP above -( who had the courtesy to reply immediately to the heartfelt message sent to him ) - we are very much afraid that the news today will not be good. After all, most of the government MPs have swallowed the current propaganda about farmers and farming and would appear to have no interest in either.
Our only hope - again - is with the House of Lords on Thursday.
Nov 5 ~Full text of Lords' AHB Third Reading debate is now on warmwell.
There are many gems which will never reach the British press - including this from the Countess of Mar; evidently feeling unwell but still at her place throughout the marathon session, she explained she was suffering from a recent vaccination ."Never again!" she cried - demonstrating all the best qualities to be found in the Upper Chamber: stoicism, intelligence, intellectual grasp, determination, stamina, and - best of all - that self deprecating sense of humour shown by the most admirable peers)
She also mentioned FARM: "...Last week, I had no
inkling that there would be today's press announcement and radio coverage of the
formation of a new organisation, called "Farm". I was merely expressing my own
dissatisfaction with the Government's apparent dependence on one or two
organisations, with apparently large memberships, which I believe provide
wonderful insurance and legal advice but which fail dismally to represent all
but a minority of their members. If the Minister "thinks" that the NFU and the
NSA--the two organisations that he has cited most--are representative of persons
and organisations that should be consulted, I ask him to think again. Seventy
per cent of farmers apparently do not believe that their interests are currently
being represented. ..." See full debate and results of voting
Nov 5 ~ ANIMAL HEALTH BILL - House of Commons Debate tomorrow
The National Foot and Mouth Group has sent an urgent letter to Mrs Beckett, pointing out
that since the introduction of the Animal Health Bill there have been very significant developments:-
1 In May 2002 the OIE made provision for return to disease free status post vaccination for FMD to be reduced from 12 months to 6 months
- 2 This change was possible because tests to differentiate between vaccinated animals and those which had responded to infection had been developed, validated for use in several countries, and were now available. These had been presented in scientific papers to the OIE in November 2001.
- 3 As a result of the development of these vaccines and tests and their endorsement by the OIE, the Royal Societies of both London and Edinburgh were able to recommend emergency vaccination as the prime control strategy in the event of a future outbreak of FMD.
At Paras 28 and 29 of the Royal Society London report - the RS makes clear these changes have taken place
- 4 In addition, the EU Temporary Committee Draft Report (Sept 2002) has also advocated emergency vaccination as a tool of first resort' and presumably the imminent EU FMD Directive due to be published very shortly will also endorse emergency vaccination as the primary means of FMD control.
Both the EU Report and the EU Directive will no doubt recognise the advances and validation of NSP free vaccines and the differential tests and make provision to deal with FMD in line with the new OIE ruling.
It would be extremely regrettable if UK law was not in conformity with the emerging EU Directive - and for the UK to be disadvantaged in the event of any future outbreak. See full letter
Nov 5 ~ The House of Lords inflicted another defeat on the Animal Health Bill yesterday - accepting Lord Greaves amendment on obtaining warrants in magistrate's court
See Telegraph report: "Peers voted last night to ease restrictions on movement of animals on farms
after the foot and mouth outbreak.
The voting, during the third reading of the Animal Health Bill was 165 to
128, a majority of 37. It caused another upset for the Government and the
Bill will return to the Commons tomorrow.
Lord Livesey (Lib Dem) said that the rule preventing livestock movement from
farms when any new animal has moved in during the previous 20 days was
causing immense hardship.
"This rule is simply not working. Farmers who obey it risk going bankrupt.
It is being flouted all over the place and the Government can do nothing
about it. The rule is unfair in its present form and unenforceable."
His amendment requires any restriction of 20 days or more to lapse at the
end of a period of eight weeks after the last confirmed foot and mouth case."
Nov 5 ~The Government was defeated again when the Lords backed a move to give farmers the right to state their case to a magistrate before a warrant was made for entry onto premises for slaughter.
How grateful we are yet again to these knowledgeable members of the House of Lords who actually understand farming and are prepared so eloquently and altruistically to fight for common sense.
Nov 5 ~ The Food Standards Agency is not trying to reassure public about vaccinated meat.
When animals are vaccinated the vaccine stays in the body only while antibodies are created. It is very much the same action as the way any mammal reacts to an insect bite. It is absurd, but perhaps a deliberate ploy, that the public still is under the misapprehension that vaccine in meat is similar to pesticide residues in vegetables (eaten widely).
Bryn Wayt has kindly sent us the following letter to the FSA in which he deplores, "... the failure of the FSA stepping in to safeguard the UK beef industry with some sort of authoritative guidance on eating meat that has been vaccinated against FMDv - despite the lofty promise: "The Agency is committed to ensuring that consumers are given clear, easily understood information they want and need in order to help them make informed choices about the food they buy". See letter and its appendix
Nov 5 ~FARM goes on the road
The new group launched yesterday, FARM, is a campaigning and membership organisation, fighting for a viable future for independent and family farms. They say,"We exist to protect and promote the interests of farmers, to get their voices heard by decision-makers, and to campaign for a positive future for farming, rural communities and the countryside."
FARM is inviting farmers to "air their views on the farming crisis and find out about FARM's agenda at a series of regional meetings around the UK.
The first six meetings are planned for Shropshire, Kent, Cumbria, Lancashire, Derbyshire and East Anglia - with more to come."
Visit www.farm.org.uk for more information from 12 November, or email them at: info@farm.org.uk
Nov 5 ~ " Animals from the Duchy
Home Farm have to be sent to Cinderford to be slaughtered"
Hilary's farm food diary moves to Herts, Oxfordshire and Gloucestershire. Extract:"...One of their greatest
concerns is the lack of a local slaughterhouse. There was a mobile unit based at
Castle Combe. They were forced to
close by all the new regulations, but, now that Defra are on their side, they
are hoping to start up again if they can find a base to operate from. Pauline
was thinking of writing to the Prince of Wales to ask if there might be room at
Highgrove. Animals from the Duchy
Home Farm have to be sent to Cinderford to be slaughtered, as the Dixons'
animals do. I said I would support
Pauline and write to the Prince as well...."
Nov 4/5 ~New UK farming pressure group challenges NFU
The best piece of news in months - (and one that gives us hope that warmwell may at last be able to hang up its keyboard ) - is the emergence of FARM which launched itself today with a dramatic action oustide DEFRA headquarters, highlighting the crisis facing independent and family farms: "missing person" posters were put up outside DEFRA, along with 11 empty
farm boiler-suits "hung out to dry", to symbolise the 4,000 farmers a year driven out
of business in the past 50 years.
The website, now online, proclaims: " FARM is a new campaigning voice, fighting for a viable future for independent and family farms...."
From the Reuters report:"The NFU only represents a third of farmers," FARM co-ordinator Robin
Maynard told Reuters o nMonday. "It has also found it very difficult to
challenge the government, so we want an organisation that campaigns for
farmers."
Lincolnshire farmer Peter Lundgren, one of FARM's founders, accused the NFU
of letting down the farming industry. "To lose 200,000 farmers since the end
of the Second World War is an indictment of any union....The NFU has allowed big supermarkets and agribusiness to become too
powerful. Farmers have gone from being respected members of
society to being viewed as somewhere between bank managers and paedophiles."
On Monday, FARM handed over a draft farm bill to Margaret Beckett which calls for fair farmgate prices, help for rural communities,
opportunities for young people entering the industry and maintenance of the
countryside. Regional meetings will be held around the country to canvas wider farmer opinion and recruit members for the group.
The first meeting will be in Shropshire on 20 November.
See also articles today by Zac Goldsmith and Robert Ulig in the Telegraph.
Nov 4/5 ~What are the endless regulations worth to the big producers that stifle small producers?
Zac Goldsmith, editor of the Ecologist and founder member of FARM, writing in the Telegraph today: "....There's nothing inevitable about rural decline. We get in this country what we pay for. And we're paying vast amounts to be part of a global food system dominated by agribusiness conglomerates that have grown out of all proportion. Locally, regionally, nationally and globally, it's impossible to exaggerate how powerful they've become.
.....what value would you ascribe to the tremendous political access that agribusiness enjoys? What's it worth to Tesco to have members on virtually every government task force? What are the endless regulations worth to the big producers that stifle small producers?
So Lord Haskins's talk of "cheap" food is Orwellian double-speak. We merely pay twice for it; over the counter, and through our taxes.
The choice before the public couldn't be clearer: go with the trends towards agribusiness, and allow Britain, as a policy goal, to become dependent for its most basic survival on volatile commodity markets; or choose to support agriculture, based on diverse farms and farm types, that feeds the nation, sustains local communities, enriches our countryside and its wildlife, and offers opportunities for fresh blood to enter farming.
That's the farming that Farm will fight for, tooth and nail." Read Zac Goldsmith's whole article
Nov 4/5 ~ Nick Green presses Mr Rex Toft for some answers
Still very concerned at the insipidity of the Cumbria report, Nick has today sent this letter to the Cumbria County Council
Nov 4 ~ No genuine farmers in new Curry group - just an NFU employee and the boss of the biggest agribusiness in the country
A news release from Michael Hart's Small and Family Farms Alliance says, "Mrs Beckett's department has just announced the members of a new group set up to implement the Report of the Policy Commission on the future of Farming and Food. Considering it is about farming and its future, it is with amazement we find that there are no real farmers in its make up. The token gesture towards farming interests being an employee of the NFU and the boss of the largest agribusiness in the country which farms some 80,000 acres, hardly representative of the average sized UK family farm of 180 acres. "
Nov 4 ~ Britain signs arms-for-agriculture accord
This piece of information came from the Bangkok Post on 19th October 2002.
By Wassana Nanuam
"Britain has signed a counter trade agreement under which it will promote sales of Thai agricultural produce in return for supplying weapons to the military.
The deal was signed yesterday (18th Oct) by British ambassador Lloyd Smith and Gen Chavalit Yongchaiyudh, deputy Prime Minister overseeing security matters.
Under the pact, the British government would seek to increase imports of local farm produce, as well as find new markets for Thai goods. In return, the military would procure arms from BAE Systems Co, formerly known as British Aerospace. Also present at the signing ceremony were Defence Minister Gen Thammarak Isarangkura na Ayudhaya and Defence deputy permanent secretary Gen Uthai Shinawatra."
As Michael Hart comments,"I find it unbelievable that at a
time when farming in the UK has such major problems that our own
government is going to promote sales of Thai agricultural produce in
direct competition with UK farmers".
How many other deals has this government done like
this?
Nov 4 ~ "we have enough legislation, we don't need any more".
Mary Marshall has sent us a message about the US National Animal Health Emergency System. Her message begins: "You may find the US National Animal Health Emergency System (NAHEMS)
interesting, with its attention to cooperation, collaboration and
preparedness ("prevent, prepare, respond, recover")...." The first part discusses progress on the 7 "Action Guidelines", with a
progress report on each in an appendix...Then there is a list of 5 goals and their objectives.." As she says, "At one point during the meeting which discussed these issues, someone explained that "we have enough legislation, we don't need any more".
If
only the UK would concentrate more on cooperative rather than legal efforts
we might be in a better state of preparedness here for the next emergency."
Read Mary's summary or go straight to the NAHEMS link
November 4 ~ No stamp needed for letters to your MP
We are grateful to Adrian for telling us today "In reply to my asking friends to send faxes to their MPs ref. the amendments to the animal death bill, I was told by the secretary of the local Parish Council that if you send a letter to your MP at The House of Commons it does not require a stamp. A little bit of trivia that may come in useful. At least with the fax you know it got delivered."
Don't forget though that you can fax your MP with ease at http://www.faxyourmp.com
November 3 ~ Last minute lobby of MPs urged.
Apologies for warmwell's absence. Although the new warmwell computer is not yet in place, the message below from Alan Beat is so urgent that ways have now been found to update the website.
As Alan says, it is the work of a moment to send a quick fax to one's MP using the excellent faxyourmp.com and it might make all the difference. See below. The Animal Health Bill is wrong-headed and illogical. To call its detractors "irresponsible" is a clever ploy but wholly unjustified.
November 3 ~"Mrs Beckett will also confirm that a culling strategy - including some
contiguous culling - will remain at the heart of disease control strategy."
The government's view that attack is the best form
of defence when a huge and terrible mistake has been made will be in evidence again next week. Mrs Beckett's statement in response to the Lessons Learned Inquiry will take the line that the taxpayers' money, wasted in its billions, was (of course) the fault of the farmers. In a spiteful attack on its victims, the government will force farmers to pay "insurance" (no insurance company would take on FMD animal disease insurance) to pay for any future repeat of the 2001 misery. The contiguous cull, roundly condemned on all sides except that of its perpetrators as scientifically unsound, cruel and unnecessary will be defended yet again. The Animal Health Bill - if it can be stampeded through on November 6th - will give a retrospective legality to what was an illegal slaughter policy (See Lord Whitty's unsatisfactory replies to Lord Willoughby de Broke's questions on legality).
This article from This is Plymouth expresses its concern about the proposals - which, it will be remembered, were leaked to the Times before any chance of debate in Parliament. It remains to be seen whether Mrs Beckett will refer to the Royal Society Inquiries which, against government expectations, made recommendations that implied grave criticisms of the policies adopted. (See summary of the London RS report here.) We hold out little hope that the EFRA committee's recommendation that " It will also be vital that the Government's response to these reports co-ordinates their findings in such a way as to provide the basis for an improved strategy to counter a future outbreak of foot and mouth ..." is going to happen since all indications are that the government has used the reports for a cherry-picking exercise of self-justification.
November 3 ~ ".. the deviancy and deception which steered the country away from a civilised programme of vaccination towards the brutal policy of mass slaughter"
In view of the above, it is timely to recall what Magnus Linklater wrote in The Times when the Royal Society reports were published :"....With restraint, courtesy and admirable clarity, the Royal Society in London, and its counterpart the Royal Society of Edinburgh, have eviscerated the Government's handling of the foot"and"mouth epidemic. Their reports, issued this week, expose not only the awful catalogue of mistakes which cost many billions of pounds and brought the British tourist industry to its knees last summer, but reveal, between their well modulated lines, the deviancy and deception which steered the country away from a civilised programme of vaccination towards the brutal policy of mass slaughter..." (Read more)
November 3 ~ Margaret Beckett, the Environment Secretary, is expected to signal the U-turn this week
Geoffrey Lean, Environment Editor of the Independent, writes, "Ministers are preparing an embarrassing retreat on foot and mouth, accepting that closing the countryside and lighting massive funeral pyres was wrong, and conceding that vaccinating, rather than slaughtering, animals would be considered much more seriously in any future epidemic.
Margaret Beckett, the Environment Secretary, is expected to signal the U-turn this week in a response to three official inquiries sharply critical of the handling of the outbreak..."
The brief article then makes the astonishing statement, "Ministers also now accept that most of the disease was spread by farmers themselves, and that many made money through massive abuses of the compensation system." This is a great shame and we are surprised to read such a sentence from the respected Mr Lean. It gives the impression yet again that the farmers were somehow to blame. How tired we are of the monstrous lie so successfully peddled by the government that farmers did nicely out of the horror. While there were certainly a few rogue farmers, the vast majority of farmers affected by the lunatic slaughter policies of the UK government were paid the correct price for stock that they would much rather have kept alive. There are countless others who suffered as a result of the unnecessary D notices and who were never compensated at all. Our greatest sympathy is for the vast numbers of small farmers particularly in Cumbria, Devon, the Forest of Dean, Wales and Dumfries and Galloway, bullied and traumatised by a Ministry they had thought they could trust. Their story will one day be properly told. Meanwhile the lies and prevarication continue - to the astonishment of experts abroad who see that even now, UK government officials and government vets seek to save their reputations with half apologies.
November 3 ~ "The House of Lords has worked hard to draw the sting from the Animal Death Bill....
with these recent amendments (see entry for Oct 25)" wrote Alan Beat in his latest smallholders.org newsletter, "
Now it's our turn.
The sixth of November is next Wednesday. We can't change the government majority, but we can lobby our MPs to resist the attempt to overturn these amendments.
Here's what we suggest. Click on this link: www.faxyourmp.com
Navigate through the site to locate your own MP and send him/her a fax along these lines - or simply copy and paste the message below.
The whole process is straightforward and will only take a minute or two of your time. Please note that sending a fax is important. A letter is also fine (provided you know the name of your MP) and can be sent to the House of Commons, London SW1A 0AA. But e-mails are generally less effective; many MP's do not offer an e-mail address, while those that have one cannot be relied upon to read messages. Our own MP tells us frankly that e-mail is a waste of time as he receives so many that he cannot possibly deal with them all." (see whole message)
November 3 ~ "There is also deeply entrenched opposition to the Animal Health Bill..."
(Guardian)".. among both Conservative and cross-bench farming peers who strongly object to the new powers given to state vets and slaughtermen to overcome resistance to compulsory slaughter experienced during the foot and mouth crisis. The bill was delayed for months after peers invoked an ancient right to insist the outcomes of the government's foot and mouth inquiries were considered. As a result, the bill was substantially amended...."
See article entitled "Four major pieces of legislation in jeopardy"
Nov 2 ~"Tell a lie often enough and it eventually becomes a truth"
Warmwell readers will be interested to read this piece by Richard Lutwyche, Editor of the ARK , the Journal of the Rare Breeds Survival Trust entitled Sheep on Trial
"....Government quangos in the form of the Spongiform Encephalopothy Advisory Committee (SEAC) and the Food Standards Agency (FSA) are actively involved in pursuing the persecution of British sheep and DEFRA are blindly following their lead. There is a long standing and determined effort to prove that sheep suffer from BSE. It matters not a jot that despite large sums of tax payers' money being thrown at finding evidence for the prosecution (you may remember the testing of sheep brains that turned out to be those of cows) none has yet been found to stand up in court. The very fact that those in authority keep making statements sublimely linking sheep with BSE and introducing measures that assume BSE is in the sheep population, means that eventually the media and the public believe it, even when substantive investigation has failed to find the evidence. Tell a lie often enough and it eventually becomes a truth - the sort of propaganda methods perfected by the likes of Hitler and Stalin.
....when I asked an official from the Government's Chief Scientist's Department - (more stupid questions!) - how many different variants of Scrapie there were, the answer was at least three and maybe as many as 19. And when I asked if we knew how the good and the bad alleles influenced these variations, answers came there none. So we have a plan, so far voluntary but soon to become obligatory, that links a disease that has ben around for hundreds of years to a recently identified horrible disease affecting small numbers of humans, that is attempting to eliminate certain genetic elements from sheep in this country without fully understanding the implications of so doing. .." Read the full article
Oct 29 ~ a degree of mystery over what really went on and an equal lack of
apportioning of culpability.
The Times article today, Clearly a
case for transparency : "TRANSPARENCY is the word that the Government
and its representatives favour when they are talking about how the financial
services industry should clean up its act.
...The Government's
reluctance to hold a public inquiry into the foot and mouth fiasco caused a
similar degree of fury among farmers, but Tony Blair would not be budged. In
place of a public inquiry, he offered a plethora of different inquiries. The
result remains a degree of mystery over what really went on and an equal
lack of apportioning of culpability..."
Oct 29 ~ Beckett rules out answer to key inquiries on FMD
Robert Brookes of The Journal (Newcastle) writes today in this article, " Ministers
were last night accused of ignoring two regional inquiries into the handling
of the foot-and-mouth crisis. They said they would be relying on their own
investigation, not local recommendations....Agriculture Secretary Margaret
Beckett said the findings of the subsequent inquiries held by Cumbria and
Northumberland county councils, will not be given a response..."
But the
day of reckoning will surely come in spite of this frantic ducking and
weaving. The UK is regarded with increasing amazement by other countries
whose approach to animal disease control genuinely seeks the best input from
all parties. For the UK government so blatantly to ignore local reports that
listened to the people who were hurt by their policy is, as David Maclean
says in the Journal
report, a disgrace. It is also a measure of their anxiety at the gradual
but inevitable emergence of the truth.
Oct 29 ~ Mass Sheep Slaughter - ".. In the audience were a few members of
the FSA.."
We have received this email:
"After some extensive ringing round I may have discovered the source
of this nasty rumour. In April 2001 a French scientist published a paper
on nvCJD relating to one particular death where an unusual prion had been
discovered. This paper is now part of the history of BSE related events
but the same story was related at a conference in Cardiff a couple of
weeks back. In the audience were a few members of the FSA. ...............
(RECEIVED by email at 12.30 p.m. A quick correction. "Professor
Jeanne Brugere-Picoux (Maisons-Alfort)said that one human patient with
sporadic CJD had a prion strain identical to one French strain of scrapie.
The work was in 2001. So important to note sporadic not new variant!" )
According to the MLC there are no known plans for any mass slaughter
but they said, "if BSE is found in sheep"........... Defra would not want
to be caught with its pants down as were MAFF at the outset of the FMD
disaster (why break a habit of a lifetime?) They were therefore possibly
laying down information for future use. I seem to recall that they made
some odd enquiries last year about the availability of railway sleepers
from woodyards............ just routine.
The abattoir which is having
its sheep lines improved could conceivably be just that - so whilst these
show a possible answer maybe a Red Alert is too strong. However, we need
to keep vigilant and any information will be welcomed."
We agree. There
have been millions of healthy animals killed unnecessarily because of phony
science and political dishonesty. Common humanity, decency, and simple good
sense are now routinely sacrificed to protect reputations.
Oct 29 ~ Farmers Weekly reports on Lord Haskins' review of DEFRA
spending
See report.
There is little need for a comment on any of this for readers of warmwell.
One is simply reminded of Sir Humphrey's honeyed words about internal
inquiries. Following David Curry's concern about administration within
Defra....the report says,
".....It is thought that the review will focus
on the work of the Countryside Agency. A spokesman for the department said:
"Defra has been proposing to carry out the review into the way it
delivers rural policy. "This review comes out of the spending review
settlement which set new targets of how the government delivers its policy
in rural areas." The spokesman said there was no timescale for the review as
it . ..."
Oct 29 ~"The more stupid and restrictive rules you invent, the more
industrious and inventive people become at getting round them"
With these optimistic words, Hilary finishes the latest section of her
real food ediary. Updated
here
Oct 29 ~ "The threat is from a developer....All locals are against this,
but the planning ban has been overturned on appeal."
Hilary's latest diary
entry includes the following, which is not optimistic at all -and
horribly commonplace these days:
HALESWORTH, SUFFOLK is a small town
under threat. At the moment it has three excellent butchers, one of whom,
DICK HURRAN, is world-class. Mr Hurran is a perfectionist who chooses all
his meat himself from traditional local herds, and hangs it for four weeks.
There is an ORGANIC SHOP where I finally found a local bran cereal. They
make it themselves. There is a delicatessen, called COUNTRY KITCHEN, who
make their own freezer foods and sell another local milk from DOUGLAS FARM,
DITCHINGHAM, SUFFOLK.
The threat is from a developer who wants to build
a supermarket. All locals are against this, but the planning ban has been
overturned on appeal.
Oct 29 ~ The Strachans are forging a trail that is so important for
British farming. They are over-worked and harassed.
"David and Colette Strachan have a dairy herd of 200 Holsteins. They
process, bottle and sell their own milk under the trade name of MARYBELLE.
It's lovely milk, which should be in all the local shops. The cream is made
into ice-cream, also by the hard-working Strachans. It is sold in local
shops as SUFFOLK MEADOW ICE CREAM There are numerous delicious flavours.
They also do sorbets. This brave, independent venture is struggling against
enormous odds. "It's a big big hill to climb," Colette told me "and I don't
like heights."
RENDHAM HALL FARM 01728 663440
The Strachan's are
forging a trail that is so important for British farming. They are
over-worked and harassed. They need more outlets for their milk. They need a
website. They need our support."
Oct 28 ~ Have slaughterhouses been asked if they could cope with a sudden
mass slaughter of sheep?
This sounds rather like the timber companies being asked if they had
"sleepers for pyres" before the FMD outbreak was news. (It will be
remembered that, at the time, this was explained as being a "routine
inquiry".) We read in the Smallholders.org newsletter
"A journalist has picked up a story which seems to suggest that "an
enquirer" is asking slaughterhouses if they have the capacity to cope with
a sudden mass slaughter of sheep.
I don't like to overreact to stories
such as this but the source is reliable. Are we dealing with something
from Liealot Morley or his hard-back edition in the House of Lords, the
noble Lord Whitty/Crippen?
Grateful if you have any support or rigid
denials for this."
In view of the identity of the journalist and
newspaper concerned - and in view also of the continuing offerings from the
Food Standards Agency suggesting, but never quite stating, that vCJD may be
contracted from eating lamb, warmwell takes this rumour very seriously. One
could almost believe that even West Nile virus could be seized upon as yet
another excuse to rid Britain of the rest of her sheep - a consummation
devoutly to be wished in some quarters, it seems. We hope that all this
turns out to be as ill-founded as the FSA pronouncements themselves.
Oct 28 ~ The Times leak - we still don't know.
Why was a newspaper informed ahead of elected representatives of the
British public what the Government intend? (See Warmwell on Oct 25 and
the Times editorial for
Oct 22) Last Thursday Mr Lidington asked Mr Morley "when the Government
were planning to publish their new contingency plans on foot and mouth
disease and respond to the various inquiry reports " He was told that the
draft document "involves a great deal of consultation and discussion. That
is right and proper because we want to be open and transparent about this.
We intend to bring forward the completed conclusions as quickly as possible
and to encourage as much involvement and debate as possible..."
Yet on
Oct 22 detailed reference was made to the contents of the draft document including its
proposals
Oct 28 ~ An FMD levy on farmers - yet another nail in a well hammered
coffin?
One of the proposals leaked by the Times on Oct 22
was that Ministers are considering a "levy" to contribute to the cost of
future outbreaks of FMD . The bare-faced unfairness of this, given the
government's incompetence and waste of public money to the tune of billions,
is surely likely to result in widespread rebellion even in such a
well-behaved and downtrodden industry as that in the UK. With no one to
speak up strongly for them, the family farmers (referred to by the Countess
of Mar "Family farmers are still the major keepers of livestock in the
UK.. It is painful and insulting for them to find themselves bracketed with
the rogues by others who have little knowledge of farming") are now
turning to the Farmers Guardian and its "Enough is Enough - End the 20 day Rule Now" campaign. This excellent newspaper has
already sent out 10,000 stickers, and says, "The campaign is entering a
crucial phase with increasing attention from politicians and media"
Predictably, Elliot Morley says that opponents are "irresponsible". This
is one of those over-used DEFRA words for anyone who would like to cut down
on their obsessive use of red tape. However, according to Robert Forster of
the National Beef Association the 20 day rule is a "massive and unnecessary
intrusion on practical farm management" while John Thorley ( Chief
Executive, National Sheep Association) says the "illegal activity shows the
rule is unworkable and must be replaced with something less draconain which
commands the confidence of farmers" .
Oct 28 ~ Same tired old myths from new BVA president Peter Jinman
How is it that a veterinary surgeon - the president of the BVA - can be
so woefully misinformed as is, apparently, Mr Jinman? What qualifications in
virology, what practical expertise in treating FMD does he have to make such
pronouncements as those he made during a visit to Northern Ireland - and if
he has none, whom has he asked? Mr Jinman is reported as saying that there
were "major limitations" on what could be achieved through vaccination. Can
Mr Jinman really be unaware that FMD was successfully
wiped out by vaccination in Uruguay in 2001? This is not "pressure group
opinion" but hard fact.
He also maintained that laboratory facilities
for using marker vaccinates capable of differentiating between live virus
and antibodies from vaccination were "not available" - yet this email from Intervet
received in March shows that they are indeed ready for use, given the
willingness of the country to use them. We even got the old chestnut about
the issue of "how to persuade consumers to buy meat and milk from
vaccinates". Since they do already and since the Consumer Council made it
very clear in the middle of last year that no labelling would be
required, this "issue" is non-existent and ludicrous.
He has
perpetuated the idea that eradication (by which he means killing animals
whether infected or not) is still the way to treat FMD. There will be many
engineers of the 2001 horror who will rejoice to hear him say so. But he is
wrong. The EU Temporary
Committee has said in its draft document "this policy cannot continue in
its present form" ; the Royal Society Inquiries recommend emergency
vaccination. The facts are here on this website and most have been here for
months. Vaccination is effective and should have been used in Feb/March 2001
(see vaccination
page) Rapid diagnostic testing will now be used in other countries,
particularly the USA. Real world experts are privately astonished at the
UK's continuing refusal to face up to the grotesque mistakes of last year -
and also its stubborn clinging to the unworkable 20-day rule.
The UK
seems to believe that sticking its head in the sand will save its face - a
doubtful strategy. Simply to ignore the combined expertise of such as Dr Sutmoller and Dr
Barteling, gained in many years of FMD research on pathogenicity,
epidemiology, vaccine technology both in the laboratory and in the field,
will not make such informed expertise go away..
Oct 28 ~ DEFRA's £300 million budget and nearly 300 quangos and
agencies..will there be a proper investigation?
Saturday's news that the Prime Minister had ordered an investigation
into DEFRA was reported by the BBC: "....MPs say Defra has a huge raft of
overlapping agencies which waste money and fail to deliver. BBC news
correspondent Miriam O'Reilly said the investigation would particularly
focus on the work of the Countryside Agency. She said: "Lord Haskins will
not only look at how Defra spends its budget of nearly £300 million, but
whether it is in control of its nearly 300 quangos and agencies."
The
review has come after pressure from David Curry, chairman of the all-party
parliamentary committee, (i.e. the EFRA committee) ...."
The Evening Standard's
report of this was quite different
..."Lord Haskins has refused to confirm or deny the report. Asked
whether he had been asked to look at Defra's spending, he said: "That's
rather grandiose and rather ambitious. You would have to ask somebody else
that." But he told Radio 4's Today programme: "Tony Blair has asked me to
do nothing for about 12 months and I haven't spoken to him for about 12
months. "I get asked, I've done reports for the Government on foot and
mouth and on red tape ... so they ask me from time to time my views on how
we could reduce the red tape on farmers, and I'm very glad to help when
they ask me."
Defra itself has referred to the investigation as a
"small internal project looking at Rural Support Grants"...
Oct 28 ~ "Time Out Looms for Welfare Bill"
said the Farmers' Guardian on friday. We have never heard it called that
before - but since the correct title "Animal Health Bill" is a similar cruel
misnomer it hardly matters. Alistair Driver comments: " Even if MPs, as
expected, throw out the Lords' amendments, the Bill cannot become law until
both Houses agree on its content.....If the Peers ultimately refuse to give
in, the Bill will be lost."
He then quotes from the debates (full debate here) the
Countess of Mar, Lord Livsey of Talgarth and the splendid Baroness Byford
who said, " The Animal Health Bill arose mainly from Government oversights
and incompetence. It is an attempt to blame the farming community for its
own shortcomings. The cull took out millions of animals which had no sign of
infection and which tested negative."
Oct 28 ~ DEFRA's strict cleansing regulations do not apply to live export
lorries
"..while vehicles transporting animals to and from UK markets are
required by the regulations to be thoroughly cleansed and disinfected and
may may also be subjected to an inspection after making their deliveries,
the same rules do not apply for vehicles transporting animals for live
export.
Travelling from all parts of the UK, they may drop their cargo
at a lairage or port and immediately turn round and return without any
undergoing any cleansing regime whatsoever" (email from farmtalking.org)
So much for
DEFRA's common sense "joined-up" approach to animal disease precautions.
Oct 28 ~ A question for Mrs Beckett
See Booker's
Notebook yesterday.
"It was illustrative of why Margaret Beckett is
so loved and respected as our agriculture minister that, when she went off
to Paris last week to celebrate the lifting of the French ban on British
beef, she refused to eat even one mouthful of the plate of that delicacy put
in front of her. What she might have done, of course, was take this
opportunity to ask, publicly, one of the greatest unanswered questions of
the whole BSE scare.
Until 1996 France was the biggest export market for
Britain's old milking cows, precisely the animals most susceptible to BSE.
The French imported hundreds of thousands each year, to make pies and other
meat products. Yet, if there was genuinely any link between eating beef
and CJD, why were only two cases ever reported in France?
Neither
the French Government nor our own scientists were ever asked this question,
because an honest answer might have suggested there was no link between
British beef and CJD at all. But when everyone is in the grip of the kind of
hysteria that was unleashed by this greatest of all food scares, the last
thing you can expect of any politician is to look at the facts."
Oct 28 ~ Why the EU money to fight animal disease was not applied for -
and the mortal crisis of British agriculture
(see entry for Oct
25 )
Any additional Brussels funding we apply for (more than the
basic subsidies) has to be co-funded by the UK taxpayers at 83 percent under
the small print of the UK budget rebate. The Treasury takes a tough line on
this and says that, in order to maximise the effect of our rebate, we should
apply for the minimun we can get away with.
Hence, in part, the mortal
crisis of British agriculture, which is expected to compete against EU
farrmers who are much more heavily subsidised than our own.
Oct 28 ~ No discernible improvement after the strict bureaucratic rules
dreamed up by Brussels's environmental experts
Last week's Muckspreader in Private
Eye"The parrot cry of the reformers (including Britain's Rosa Klebb, aka
Margaret Beckett) is that we must shift subsidies away from production (fat
cheques for barley barons) and towards looking after the 'environment'.
Farmers must be paid not for over-producing barley and sheep but as
'stewards of the countryside'. In this way, argue Rosa and her pals, such as
the Green ex-social worker Renate Kunast who is Germany's farm minister, the
birds, bees and flowers will be brought back to our poison-drenched prairie
fields and even hardened city dwellers will accept that there might after
all be a case for continuing to lavish £30 billion a year of taxpayers'
money on the EU's farmers.
Like everything else about the EU, it may
sound fine in theory. But what about the practice?"
Private Eye's Muckspreader last week.
Oct 28 ~ Dozens of pet birds slaughtered - and West Nile Virus now in
Britain
If, as we hear, WNV has really be found in this country should we expect
the reaction of the authorities to be another panic wave of killing? We read
in the New
York Times that "State and federal agriculture officials, attempting to
contain a month- old outbreak of a deadly bird virus known as Exotic
Newcastle disease, have killed more than 8,000 birds in Southern
California, including thousands of chickens and dozens of household pet
birds." while in this country, the Times tells us that
Deadly West Nile brain virus reaches Britain
THE
government's chief medical officer has been alerted that the deadly West
Nile virus, which has killed more than 100 Americans in the past month, has
arrived in Britain for the first time....."
Has the UK remembered to
inform the OIE, we wonder?
Oct 25 ~ UK makes no bid for EU millions for animal disease
eradication
Brussels, 18 October 2002 Commission
approves EUR 132 million package to fight animal diseases
"...All
Member States, with the exception of the United Kingdom, submitted the
Commission their programmes for these different tests. The programmes have
been evaluated by the Commission taking into account the epidemiological
situation and the total population of bovine, ovine and caprine
animals..."
The LandCare
website carries a report from the Dundee Courier for 19th Oct with the
headline: UK not to share in £84m aid While other european coutries
have asked for sizeable contributions from the EU package to monitor and
control such diseases as BSE and scrapie, the UK - it would appear - has no
even applied.
Why not? Does it feel it has no need of money? Did it not
know of the offer? What other possible explanation is there?
Oct 25 ~ ...Anthony Gibson of the NFU said: "Defra's administration is of
the standard the average banana republic would be ashamed."
"Driven to despair, we're taking Defra to court to judicial review over
penalties that have been applied to farmers' livestock claims." See today's
BBC report: Farmers
owed thousands in subsidies.
Oct 25 ~ The Animal Health Bill - can it really be bulldozered through
before the end of the session?
The House of Commons will debate the Lords amendments on 6 November,
one day before the Government intends to close the current session.
The debate will not include other aspects of the Bill. The Commons
government majority is nearly 180. However, the Countess of
Mar's amendment is humane, logical and scientifically sound - and it is hard
to see how it can be overturned without the government being seen to be
putting blatant party politics before common sense. It is possible that the
Government will offer some compromise to avoid the risk of the whole Bill
falling because the two Houses cannot agree. As yet Ministers have given no
indication of this.
Oct 25 ~ How was a draft document requiring "as much involvement and
debate as possible" (Elliott Morley) already written and leaked to the
Times?
Last Thursday Mr Lidington asked Mr Morley "when the Government were
planning to publish their new contingency plans on foot and mouth disease
and respond to the various inquiry reports "
He was told that the draft
document "involves a great deal of consultation and discussion. That is
right and proper because we want to be open and transparent about
this. We intend to bring forward the completed conclusions as quickly as
possible and to encourage as much involvement and debate as possible..."
Yet on Oct 22 detailed reference was made to the contents of the draft
document in this Times
editorial.
Mr Lidington asked the Speaker if there had been "any
approach from the uSecretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural
Affairs wishing to come to the House and make a statement, either simply to
express her shock and outrage at the fact that a newspaper should have been
informed ahead of elected representatives of the British public or, even
better, to give Parliament a full account of whatever the Government intend
to propose?" (See report of
the point of order)
Oct 25 ~ The money goes into Defra's coffers
This Ananova
article about an auction of unwanted FMD equipment "stockpiled as part
of contingency planning" shows us DEFRA reaching new depths of surrealism
"....From Portaloos to plastic buckets, sandbags to boiler suits and
even a coal bunker and a cattle crush, 500-plus lots went under the hammer
in Thirsk, North Yorkshire.
A quid was enough to secure a new desk while
a portable toilet (unused) set buyers back around £350.
The
paraphernalia was put up for auction by the Department for Environment, Food
and Rural Affairs which said it was more cost-effective to sell the unused
items than transport them to elsewhere in the country...."
Yorkshire
Today commented: "Desks, chairs, filing cabinets, drawing boards, waste
paper bins spoke volumes for the crippling bureaucracy the emergency
generated. The sale was the fourth organised to offload equipment used
during the crisis, but the first in Yorkshire."
Oct 25 ~ Geoffrey Lean of the Independent is "Environmental Journalist of
the year"
Oct 25 ~ Zac Goldsmith writes to the Telegraph
Re:
Agriculture vs agribusiness Date: 25 October 2002
"Sir - So
Britain's food industry is on the brink of collapse (report, Oct 23). That's
not news to farmers - 400 jobs in farming are lost per week. But the farming
crisis threatens more than just the food industry. The disappearance of
ordinary farms also undermines rural economies, endangers wildlife habitats
and destroys the landscape.
Why is it happening? Because the Government
has no long-term vision for farming and food production, and regards it as
"efficient" that we should depend for our national food security on
subsidised international trade and a volatile global economy.
The
country has a choice between agriculture and agribusiness. Farmers and
consumers need to work together to campaign for a viable future for farming
that is in everyone's interest.
From: Zac Goldsmith, Editor, the
Ecologist, London SW1"
Oct 25 ~ Where is the COMMON Agricultural Policy?
A British Dairy
farmer, on an internet forum yesterday: " There must be an EU plan
somewhere to use the UK to mop up French & Irish surpluses - a plan that
is more effective if you can reduce the amount of food the UK produces. Soon
we will be reliant of much more than half our food from imports which could
leave us a little hungry if war or civil unrest blocks off the supply routes
across or underneath the Channel or the Irish Sea.
I have witnessed the
heart ripped out of British agriculture over the last few years with the
closure of countless markets, almost 1000 abattoirs (to comply with EU
export rules), unfair competition from imports (subsidised by UK taxpayers),
the unnecessary break-up of the most efficient milk marketing and
distribution system in the world (which was not a monopoly in the EU), gold
plating of EU rules by the Govt, the lack of match funding compared to the
other EU14 and a succession of diseases and food scares blamed conveniently
on the UK farmer instead of the policy makers who are really to blame.
And what has the Government done to help while the French etc have been
giving start-up grants to farmers sons (as the parents hand over the farm),
match funded subsidies and discretionary subsidies (partly UK taxpayers
money) to their farmers? Basically said "if you cannot stand the heat, get
out of the kitchen!" or "Go organic - with "sorry there is not enough money
to help you over the transition period..." (More)
Oct 24 ~ Everyone clear on Dr Anderson's reasons for not recommending the
20-day standstill in his Lessons Learned Report?
Looking again at the EFRA committee's
questions to Dr Iain Anderson we puzzle over what exactly he meant in
answer to the question:
- Why did you not make a recommendation to keep the 20-day standstill
for sheep and cattle?
- (Dr Anderson) It seems to me that we have made that with a
qualification.
- (Chairman). Why the qualification? What evidence did you have that
made you put in the qualification?
- ( Dr Anderson) I think that the qualification is very simply to allow
the opportunity to tie down a proper risk assessment in an economically
relevant way through a proper cost/benefit analysis what the implications
of that would be and it is simply a response to many submissions that come
to us from across the industry that there may be other ways to provide the
security and this particular way has a special economically limiting
effect on sectors of the livestock industry. In the context of our inquiry
that limitation is not only in terms of professional knowledge but also
the timeliness that there would have to be, and we have said that there
are no arguments today in our judgement for removing the restriction, so
the restrictions are staying, according to our recommendation, but that
there are well made arguments that would call for a sober assessment, an
economically sound assessment, of the risks involved before final
decisions can be taken, and I believe we are also saying that that should
be kept alive in as much as if situations change, if risks change, then
that should be viewed in turn one way or the other."
Do others
share our difficulty in following this?
Oct 24 ~ Did the government panic during the FMD crisis?
During the questions put by the EFRA
Committee to Dr Anderson, the chairman asked (question 5):
"The
Government was clearly stung by your characterisation of the situation at
one point during this crisis as "panic". Do you still stand by the term
"panic"?
(Dr Anderson) Certainly. What I found, if one comes out from the
centre of decision making and moves into the field around the regions and
into those areas where people were fighting the real fight on the ground,
that is where I was exposed mostly to that comment and that observation. As
you know, and we may come to it in a minute when we talk about some of the
methods of our inquiry, we of course visited all these regions and whenever
we did we met with all the officials and some junior officials who were
involved in the process, and that was the source of that input and I stand
by it."
No difficulty here. "Yes" was the word Dr Anderson was searching
for.
Oct 24 ~ "government policy that has caused the problem in the first
place"
A report in yesterday's Western Mail
quotes agricultural leaders angry at the leaked DEFRA response to the
various inquiries (due to be published in December) which deflects criticism
of itself onto farmers by implying that compensation paid to farmers was a
"rip-off" of taxpayers' money. "Why should farmers be forced to indemnify
the Government from the costs of a further epidemic when it is government
policy that has caused the problem in the first place?" said Mr Morris of
the FUW. He points out also that insurance companies prepared to provide
cover for animal disease on farms will be hard to find.."As far as insurance
is concerned, most of the companies that have been approached are not very
keen about this as they feel there is too great a risk of the disease being
brought back in again."
Oct 23 ~ Earl Peel's amendment to the Animal Health Bill
'Line 22, after "exercised" insert ", which shall include the
application of such methods of detecting disease in animals as may be
available" was also agreed to last night by 186 to 127
As will be
seen from reading the Hansard report, Lord Whitty denied that diagnostic
testing was yet available. Since, according to Dr Roger Breeze's
contributions to the Royal Inquiry, it is evident that such rapid
diagnostic testing was available for use in March 2001 we cannot see where
Lord Whitty is getting his information from.
The Lord Bishop of Hereford
said,"I can see no conceivable justification for the Government not
accepting the amendment. It has the advantage of providing for the steady
development of the science which we know is continuing.... Amendment No.
7C provides for the best available diagnostic testing to be used at whatever
stage we have reached when the need arises. I hope that the Government
will accept the amendment. "
Oct 23 ~ "Family farmers are still the major keepers of livestock in the
UK.. It is painful and insulting for them to find themselves bracketed with
the rogues by others who have little knowledge of farming."
The Countess of Mar
on Tuesday : "... livestock keepers have a bond with their animals that
is almost as strong as the bond that they have with their family.
They
are also hard-headed realists. They know that, when an animal has been
exposed to a disease, it must be dealt with appropriately. They find it
tough to accept that a healthy animal that has had no contact with any
infection must die, when there might be a means of protecting it from
disease.
Equally, I recognise that farming has rotten apples, generally
known as rogues. They are the wheeler-dealers of this world who own or rent
numerous small parcels of land over a large area. They pay scant regard to
biosecurity or animal welfare, and they trade animals as stockbrokers trade
shares.
Family farmers are still the major keepers of livestock in the
UK. Most have a long association with the land and with their animals. It is
painful and insulting for them to find themselves bracketed with the rogues
by others who have little knowledge of farming or farming practices and who
get their information from the exaggerated literature produced by some
animal welfare organisations. I acknowledge and accept the need for strict
controls, but there is room for a little humanity. .."
The Countess of
Mar's contributions to all the debates on the Animal Health Bill have been
informed, calm, fluent - and full of the humanity that the bill itself so
sadly lacks.
Lord Willoughby de Broke said, "The noble Lord, Lord
Whitty, said consistently that he still needs the powers for contiguous
cull. His argument for that relies on the Lessons to be Learned report, but
seems to glide over some of the strongest recommendations of the Royal
Society of London, the Royal Society of Edinburgh and earlier reports from
Devon, all of which roundly condemn the cull policy and strongly recommend
vaccination as a prior tool of future policy. That does not appear anywhere
in the Bill, other than in amendments such as that moved by the noble
Countess. ..."
The Hansard reports for the
debates on Tuesday may be read here in their entirety.
Oct 23 ~ DEFRA desperate to prove to the EU that it is making progress on
landfill reduction
Even the 13 page executive
summary of the 181 page DEFRA risk assessment on composted waste
referred to below ensures that the following question and answer appear on
page 9.
- "Could composted catering waste spread endemic infections to
uninfected animal herds?
- The question of whether the application of composted catering waste to
agricultural land could spread the infection to uninfected herds and
flocks is not tackled directly. Instead the risks relative to those from
spreading of sewage sludge and manures are compared...."
As we
heard from an emailer two days ago, "The risk assessment has not (directly)
answered the only question that really matters, because the author knows
that the answer is not the one that DEFRA wants.
DEFRA is desperate to
avoid the wrath of the EU for the UK's lack of progress in reducing landfill
and wants to implement composting as soon as possible and to hell with the
risks to UK agriculture. HMG is planning the introduction of composting of
meat in the new year. "
Oct 23 ~ " Farmers forced to fork out"
A story on the icNewcastle site today seems to have been removed from
this link. It ran as follows: "Farmers may have to foot up to half the
bill of any future animal disease epidemic and accept limited compensation
payments under new Government plans to control costs.
It is understood
that ministers are keen to prevent any excessive payments in the future,
after last year's foot-and-mouth outbreak left the taxpayer with a £3
billion bill.
...Ed Nicholl, managing director of Newcastle-based
Lycetts Insurance Brokers, which specialises in agriculture, said: It is
inconceivable to suggest that the farming industry will be able to afford
the astronomical cost of insuring for 50 per cent of the costs of any future
outbreak of foot-and-mouth."
The measures are reported to be contained
in the draft response from Defra to the two official inquiry reports into
the outbreak - Dr Iain Anderson's Lessons Learnt report and Sir Brian
Follett's report from the Royal Society."
Oct 23 ~ "Whilst the acceptance of the 'error' related to this
farmers specific case, it has much wider implications for the veterinary
profession."
Some good news at last. "A North Devon farmer's long-running legal
battle against DEFRA came to a conclusion in the High Court on Monday. The
case, which was distinct from arguments about the legality of the contiguous
cull, centred on the legality of Veterinary Inspectors working for DEFRA and
serving a Form A on contiguous premises. DEFRA finally accepted, prior to
the full Judicial Review of the issues which was to be heard by Mr Justice
Maurice Kay, that the service of the Form A on the farmers premises had been
'in error'....DEFRA also agreed to pay the farmers reasonable costs in
pursuing the litigation. Whilst the acceptance of the 'error' related to
this farmers specific case, it has much wider implications for the
veterinary profession.
...The RCVS now has another opportunity to put
their house in order. Should they continue not to confront the ethical
problems exposed in the conduct of Vets during the epidemic, the farmer has
said that further Court action cannot be ruled out...." ( See full report)
Oct 23 ~The Countess of Mar's amendment - plea for "a little humanity" in
the Animal Health Bill, Report Stage
The House of Lords on Tuesday voted by 171 to 123 to amend the Animal
Health Bill to give priority to vaccination rather than slaughter of
uninfected animals.
Lady Mar urged the government to write "a little
humanity" into the bill. while the Conservative Lord Peyton said DEFRA has
"an addiction to slaughter." The amendment puts a duty on the Minister to
take responsibility for proper adherence by slaughter teams to proper
bio-security. Many of us will remember the lapses of simple common sense
shown by the killing teams during 2001. The amendment will now be debated in
the House of Commons during the Bill's return there - thence back to the
Lords. One begins to wonder if the Bill will manage to get through before
the Queen's Speech on November 13th after all. How much more sensible, in
the light of recent reports and the proposed overall strategy in
March, if the whole bill were to go back to the drawing board. David
Lidington's comment:"It's wrong for ministers to try to ram through this new
law when Parliament has not even had a chance to debate the reports into
foot-and-mouth that the government itself commissioned."
(Hansard report
as soon as possible)
Oct 23 ~ "If you starve the roots, the trunk of the whole tree will
die"
The
Times article by Valerie Elliott reports that Mark Hill, Deloitte &
Touche's partner in charge of food and agriculture, "fears that the
continuing trend of no or low profits from British food farming could lead
to the collapse and export of the food processing industry. He said: "One
day farmers are going to wake up and say 'farming is a mug's games and why
are we producing food without profit?'. What will be the impact on the food
chain? I think there is a danger of losing the critical mass. ...."
This
article appears under the headline Farmers 'better off not
farming'
Oct 23 ~ Sheep slaughter council fined £100,000
The
icWales website reports - "A council has been fined £100,000 after a
slaughterman it employed took shots at stray sheep in a field at the height
of the foot-and-mouth crisis.
Monmouthshire County Council has admitted
two charges of breaching the Health & Safety at Work Act in April 2001."
The Gilwern case, in which an inexperienced slaughterman took pot shots at
terrified sheep in an open field will stand as one example of panicky and
inhumane killings that were covered up during 2001. The local people who
watched in horror did not regard this as a "Health and Safety" case and nor
did the couple who video'd the harrowing event. They, of course, as
Monmouthshire taxpayers, will be helping to pay the fine.
Oct 23 ~ Lessons of 1967 'were not learned'
The Western Morning News
headline yesterday. Extract: "There will never be another outbreak like
this because I don't think the public will tolerate it, with (dead) animals
hanging around for weeks on end."
If the disease does strike again then
Lord Plumb believes ring vaccination should be employed, but not for the
animals to then be slaughtered at a later date...." Read article together
with the WMN's report
of Sir Brian Follett's warning to the EFRA Committee last week.
Oct 23 ~ Catering and Food Waste not allowed for swill - but spread on
fields?
Diane Irwin wrote to Mr Geoff Bateman Environment Agency Area Manager
for Devon... " .....Farmers' Weekly
interactive reports that the large quantities of catering and other feed
waste, available to the pig industry before last year's ban on swill, will
be spread on farmland. .... Defra's proposals could mean that the risk of a
foot-and-mouth or Swine Fever outbreak would increase 100,000-fold with risk
of wild birds and animals etc spreading disease to other sectors. This could
be catastrophic.
We seriously believe Defra has gone mad.
Please try
to help stop this insanity as we believe this will be a very serious health
issue.
Yours sincerely John & Diane Irwin, ( members of the Torbay
and South Devon Friends of the Earth)"
Back came Mr Bateman's reply on
Tuesday:
".......DEFRA commissioned a risk assessment examining the risks
to public and animal health from the use of catering waste in composting and
biogas treatment processes. The risk assessment (available from the DEFRA
website) makes recommendations on alternative treatment standards which are
at least as effective as the EU standard.
DEFRA are now looking to amend
the Animal By-Products Order 1999 to permit the treatment of catering waste
in composting and biogas plants. ....... "A public consultation on the new
proposals is expected from DEFRA shortly. All interested parties should make
use of this opportunity to make DEFRA aware of their views and comments. I
will forward your message and my reply to contacts in
DEFRA so that they are aware of your concerns".
Mrs Irwin notes that her
previous letter was forwarded to gordon-fmd.hickman@defra.gsi.gov.uk
and asks that others should write to DEFRA on this matter. See also the
reference to DEFRA's Risk Assessment and
the Risk Assessment itself - in all
its 181 pages - if it can be tracked down on the DEFRA site.
Oct 22 ~ The FMD row rumbles on...but always about the money
Valerie Eliott's article in today's Times:
"MINISTERS are bracing themselves for a barrage of public criticism over
poor financial controls during the foot-and-mouth outbreak which led to a
taxpayer's bill of £3 billion. MPs on the Public Accounts Committee are due
to issue a scathing report on the issue in the next few weeks and a debate
is expected in the House of Commons. .."
As one emailer writes today,
"What? No terrorist crisis to bury this with? How they expect farmers to pay
the insurance premiums I've no idea! Well Mr Blair, that was my £52 pounds
well spent ( £3,000,000,000 /58,000,000) £3 billion divided by the entire UK
population.. when vaccination costs so little per animal....."
See also
from another article in the Times"....
A private company would have been heavily sanctioned by its shareholders for
such naivety, but it would have honoured the deals it had made. The
Government has not felt the need for a single head to roll."
The first
Times article also publishes the Government's proposals from the
Government's draft response to the foot-and-mouth inquiries from Dr Iain
Anderson in his Lessons Learnt report and Sir Brian Follett in the Royal
Society's scientific report. Read the proposals
here. Notice particularly the face-saving contradictory fourth
proposal "A slaughter policy to control disease. Emergency vaccination
as a first resort "
Oct 22 ~Mr Gordon Adam MEP questions the motives of those who set up and
conducted the EU Temporary Committee into Foot and Mouth
In a recent speech
to the BVA Mr Gordon Adam MEP calls into question the motives of those
who set up and conducted the EU Temporary Committee into Foot and Mouth - or
indeed of anyone at all who criticised the government policy. "At times," he
said, "it was not easy to be sure if the concerns were for farming, for the
rural communities or personal. There were certainly a few who were lured by
prospects of yet more compensation"
He added that "logic, science and
reason are feeble weapons in such circumstances"
This really cannot be
allowed to pass. Science, logic and reason of the highest quality were put
forward from the very beginning of the crisis by those scientists - experts
in the FMD virus and in the practical application of rapid diagnositic
testing and vaccination -who deplored the wasteful and unnecessary policies
of Professor King's Group. They were anxious to give freely of their
expertise, with no political, financial or any other kind of strings
attached.
Among them were Professor Fred Brown, Dr Simon Barteling, Dr
Paul Sutmoller, Dr Ruth Watkins, Dr Paul Kitching, and the modest and
quietly persuasive Dr Keith Sumption, now promoted to the position of
Secretary to the European Commission for the Control of Foot-and-Mouth
Disease.
Oct 22 ~ "I see the logic of a vaccination to live approach"
Interestingly, Mr Adam ends his address (see above) with a
recognition of the usefulness of vaccination to live; a somewhat changed
tune from that sung on previous occasions
: ".... I see the logic of a
vaccination to live approach. Animals are routinely vaccinated for a number
of reasons and subsequently enter the food chain. Why should an effective
Foot and Mouth vaccine be treated differently?"
Why indeed? This is what
the true experts were saying at the start of the outbreak but a tide of
misinformation drowned their voices.
As Dr James Irvine FRSE DSc FRCPEd
FRCPath FInstBiol says in his response to the EU draft document, "certain
key figures in the veterinary world were prepared to play politics with
scientific knowledge as it suited their purpose, rather than act with the
degree of intellectual honesty that one would expect from professional
scientists".
Mr Adam was still denying that vaccination
could have worked in October 2001 and as late as June 2002 was
asserting "I also have to tell you that without the culling policy the
disease would not have been brought under control..."
Mr Adam's address
may be read here.
while Dr James
Irvine's response to the EU Draft document, measured, thoughtful and
clear, makes an interesting contrast.
Oct 22 ~ Margaret Beckett publicly refused to eat British Beef in Paris on
Monday.
She said that the French had not lifted their ban; the commentary said
they had. The pictures showed her being offered beef on a fork and refusing.
Is Mrs Beckett - along with others in the government - a vegetarian?
Oct 21 ~ All charges against Bobby Waugh have now been dropped
Bobby Waugh was in court again today. We hear that ALL charges have been
dropped. However, the haulage contractor is still being harried. The next
court session would seem to have been put back to the inappropriate date of
February 14th 2003.... more information about this as soon as possible.
Oct 21 ~ Farmers for Action get Sainsburys moving on Dairy Crest
The FFA blockade at Emerald Park depot, near Emerson's Green in Bristol
highlighted the disappearance of the extra 2p for milk producers into the
pockets of Dairy Crest. The five tractors stopped delivery lorries from
leaving or entering. David Handley spoke fluently, saying that no one wanted
to have to do this and appealing for all players to behave in a "grown up"
way. Sainsburys appeared supportive of the FFA today and said that the big
milk producer, Dairy Crest, should pass on the increase to the farmers.
(The BBC
report (15.14 pm) would appear to be out of date. It refers to the FFA
as a "pressure group" whereas it is of course the farmers' union, rapidly
gaining in popularity and respect, that is prepared to take action.)
Oct 21 ~ Farming and the countryside are slowly drowning in a rising sea
of regulations and rules largely founded on ignorance.
From friday's Westmorland Gazette
Country folk could be forgiven for posing the question "Is the government on
drugs, the ones that have you churning out reams of regulating devices?"
.... Is there anyone where it counts with the courage, the nous and the
common sense to put a stop to these absurd rules, or is there perhaps a
hidden agenda that we do not know about? I could bear to know.
..... a
small North of England slaughterhouse, which has to be typical of a great
many others up and down the country. .....has a workforce of four and
believe it or not they had FIVE, yes five government officials overseeing
them.
....I understand it went like this... an official veterinary
surgeon was supervising two meat inspectors. He, it seems was being
supervised by a principal official veterinary surgeon. Now then guess who
was monitoring them all? Why, a DEFRA state veterinary service official. To
put it kindly (as I always do), that's an awful lot of supervision for a
small slaughterhouse. ......... I well remember that meat inspections used
to be carried out by an officer from the local council as a public health
matter. Try as I might, I don't recall any great problems in those days....
." Read whole
article
Oct 21 ~ THE WORM WILL TURN
an email from Hilary, enclosing the latest part of her diary of real
food which now goes up to Octrober 19th, is as optimistic and courageous as
ever. She writes, "The worm will turn..... That is what Dot Boag says
looking back over the bureaucratic bullying and intimidation that farmers
have had to face over the last two years. (In East Anglia, they had swine
fever immediately before foot and mouth and, from all accounts, the official
response was as cruel and irrational, the restrictions as crippling)
This ediary is dedicated to
Dot, who kept us all going during foot and mouth with her courage and
compassion. She inspires me still."
Warmwell would like
to add its heartfelt thanks and warm wishes to Dot Boag, and of course to
Hilary herself.
Oct 21 ~ to hell with the risks to UK agriculture.
An emailer writes, "HMG has commissioned a 181 page Risk Assessment on
the composting of catering waste containing meat and the spreading of the
compost to land. The authors cover their backsides by slipping in amongst
all the complicated scientific formulas, the following question and answer-:
- 'Could composted catering waste spread endemic infections to
uninfected animal herds?'
- 'The question of whether the application of composted catering waste
to agricultural land could spread the infection to uninfected herds and
flocks is not tackled directly'.(our emphasis)
The risk
assessment has not answered the only question that really matters, because
the author knows that the answer is not the one that DEFRA wants.
DEFRA
is desperate to avoid the wrath of the EU for the UK's lack of progress in
reducing landfill and wants to implement composting as soon as possible and
to hell with the risks to UK agriculture.
HMG is planning the
introduction of composting of meat in the new year. "
Oct 21 ~ The FSA resurrects a salmonella myth - Booker's Notebook
Sunday
Telegraph "Now that all Britain's food laws are made in Brussels, there
is little for Sir John Krebs's Food Standards Agency to do except whip up
food scares in a forlorn bid to justify its existence. On his website Sir
John uses a recent salmonella outbreak (cause unknown) to perpetuate the
hoary old myth that salmonella poisoning can be caused by not cooking eggs
until they have turned to rubber.
Obviously no one told Sir John
that, following the Dick report in 1993, even the Government had to admit
it was wrong in falling for that batty theory that eggs can contain
dangerous quantities of salmonella.
The Public Health Laboratory
Service only came up with this theory in 1988 because it desperately needed
to create a scare to avert a threatened 40 per cent cut in its funding. The
infinitely gullible Edwina Currie fell for their trap by agreeing to
publicise this absurd claim, thus forcing 5,000 egg producers out of
business.
Now the PHLS is to be closed down any way. And Sir John's
agency acknowledges its own real status by announcing that its next public
board meeting on
November 14 will be held in the place whence it now gets all its orders,
Brussels."
Oct 21 ~ Welsh Assembly slated for foot and mouth complacency
News Wales on
Thursday "One year on after this dreadful disease eroded our rural
communities, we see that nothing appears to be moving. We are merely told
that discussions are ongoing. This is a dereliction of duty by Mike German.
A memo obtained by Plaid Cymru reveals that National Assembly officials are
keen to secure that the Assembly Minister has ' enough to give something
positive to say in any press notice announcing the publication of the
Government response'. This is another example of the Assembly Government
putting spin and good news above the welfare of farmers."
Simon
Thomas MP, Plaid's agriculture spokesperson at Westminster attacked the
Liberal Democrats for complacency and said: "The Liberal Democrats can't
even stand up for the need to devolve animal health issues to the National
Assembly for Wales, but simply say they are in discussions.
"What's the
point of the Liberal Democrats in Cardiff when everything they preach
against in agriculture - illegal meat imports; the 20-day standstill rule
and the handling of Foot and Mouth - they then support when in coalition
with Labour. It is clear that Liberal Democrats in government stand up for
Labour policies and forget their principles." ....more
Oct 21 ~ "The official response to last year's foot-and-mouth crisis has
been so inadequate that an attitude of resignation and pessimism is setting
in
according to a survey of rural people." (Western Mail)
"University researchers from Aberystwyth studied two communities to find
out how the outbreak affected people's lives and livelihoods.
Their
report - which the National Assembly has declined to publish - concludes the
crisis hasn't been followed by any significant changes in rural policy,
which continues to react to problems instead of building a structure for
development...
....Dr Scott, a lecturer in countryside management, said a
new rural agency should be established with a remit to promote economic and
social development. The DBRW had had only a weak social duty. He said many
country dwellers expected a new rural policy to emerge from the ashes of
foot-and-mouth. But although some extra money was provided for farmers and
small businesses, there was no underlying change to rural strategy. "There
was a lot of resignation there (among the interviewees)," said Dr Scott. "If
you keep getting knocked back you become so exhausted mentally that the idea
of optimism goes out of the window. more
Oct 21 ~ Survey slams crisis management
This
is London "The public has little confidence in how the authorities
handle crises, because of "secrecy" on issues such as BSE and
foot-and-mouth, a watchdog says.
People feel that recent Conservative
and Labour Governments have kept them in the dark, patronised, manipulated
and even ignored them over their concerns, research for the National
Consumer Council (NCC) found....
....NCC chairman Deirdre Hutton said the
research showed some "stark" findings and that "risk issues" had not been
handled effectively.
"This research recommends how Government can do
better in the future," she said.
"Perhaps if the Government had been
more open in its approach to GM food and crops, had shown greater honesty
about the uncertainties, and had involved the public at a much earlier
stage, we might now have a better basis to take forward a public debate. Read
more
Oct 18 ~ .. a London-based newspaper relying mainly on anecdotal
evidence.....
"The "widespread flouting" of the 20-day rule, "risking the return of
foot-and-mouth disease" was reported by a London-based newspaper relying
mainly on anecdotal evidence,"said today's
Scotsman - which added, "...But in Scotland, changes were made that
allow farmers to apply for a separation authorisation - effectively a
licence which allows stock movement as long as new and on-farm stock are
kept separate. "It's not rocket science," said a Scottish Executive
spokesman yesterday. "It simply extends what should be a well-established
principle for any livestock farm about not mixing new and existing
stock."...."
This sounds like common sense operating north of the
border.
Oct 18 ~ Farmers prosecuted for defying silly rule
After Valerie Elliott's onslaught in the Times
yesterday (she told us that "farmers are deliberately flouting
strict animal movement controls and risking the return of foot-and-mouth
disease less than a year after the epidemic that cost the
taxpayer £3 billion." ) we are not surprised to see the reason for the three
articles today. Having been nicely infuriated by all this irresponsibility
from farmers, Times readers will be relieved to see that "In Devon, trading
standards officers have issued 107 formal cautions and 134 breach notices to
farmers. Six farmers have been prosecuted and another two await court
hearings. .."
The 20 day rule, Ms Elliott notwithstanding, is an ass.
And where a law is widely held to be so by those who understand the issues,
such as, in this case, the veterinary and scientific experts in foot and
mouth as opposed to the highly politicised DEFRA vets , the law should be
changed.
We are seeing here the continuation of last year's senseless
and cruel vendetta carried on to intimidate farmers. More and more people we
meet are asking sadly, "What on earth is our country coming to?"
Oct 18 ~ Ministers to be asked questions about meaningless
regulations
One example: You cannot sell warm fresh eggs in your farm shop direct to
the public who want them. They must be sent away to be packaged, stamped and
dated....Yet the same farm shop owner may provide the same eggs for
breakfast to customers in her B&B.
For those able to receive BBC
POints West, tune in to Sunday Lobby at 1.00 pm on Sunday for a discussion
on the regulations that are strangling farm food businesses.
Oct 17/18 ~ "Would it be better to put all our energy into trying to get
reasonable stuff into the Animal Welfare Bill rather than fighting the lost
cause of the AHB?"
Hilary writes,"What about all this legislation? I'm beginning to think
the government's multiple approach is quite clever. Would it be better to
put all our energy into trying to get reasonable stuff into the Animal
Welfare Bill rather than fighting the lost cause of the AHB? Realistically,
I would like to see
- live exports stopped,
- short journeys for all animals,
- farmers, the general public and everyone putting animals welfare
before profit and also before "good food", so that the first question
asked would automatically be "has the animal had a good life?"
If
it were axiomatic that animal welfare came first, The AHB wouldn't matter so
much. Am I talking a load of nonsense? I get the feeling that I am wasting
precious time writing to MP's..."
"A load of nonsense" would undoubtedly
be the verdict of those who exploit animals and quiet their consciences with
the vicious notion that animal pain doesn't matter. In a civilised country
it would already be axiomatic that animal welfare is of the first
consideration - and who, after FMD 2001, could call the UK civilised?
As for writing to MPs, we agree that letters tend to fall on very stony
ground indeed. This is partly because "precious time" is what the poor
overworked MPs are not prepared to spend on reading what it takes us so long
to prepare for them. Information overload squashed flat their democratic
principles long ago and they can't now take in much more than headlines from
politically correct sources. If any MP reading this disagrees, it would be
very salutary to hear from them.
Oct 16/17 ~The Food Animal Initiative
Professor Paul Harvey, Head of the Department of Zoology at Oxford
University: "The two fundamental components of animal welfare are what makes
animals healthy and what the animals themselves want. The challenge is to
embed the two into commercial farming so that good welfare goes hand in hand
with viable agricultural systems."...Initial projects will include:
- Recreating forest floors for pigs to allow them to rediscover their
favourite hobby - rooting.
- Using satellites to map sheep trekking around their fields, to study
their natural feeding habits.
- Provision of natural cover for cattle to ease the calving process and
the introduction of traditional easy care breeds.
- Utilising waste space on farm to provide affordable recreational areas
for housed animals.
Other projects will look for new ways to
increase recycling of farm materials, and how to convert waste ground on
farms into usable space.
British farmers will be involved throughout the
project, ensuring that results and information are relevant to their needs,
and can be used effectively on modern farms..." From http://www.admin.ox.ac.uk/po/020620.shtmlSee
also the FAI home page The FAI
media launch was held at the farm on 24th June 2002. On 15th and 16th May,
FAI delivered formal presentations at the Pig & Poultry Fair at
Stoneleigh.
Oct 17 ~ "The contingency plan for dealing with a recurrence of
foot-and-mouth should include emergency vaccination as a "tool of first
resort" alongside the culling of animals directly affected,
Sir Brian Follett told the Commons Rural Affairs Committee (EFRA) There
was no suggestion from Sir Brian that any kind of contiguous or firebreak
culling was necessary and his words to EFRA show how alarmed he is at the
lack of proper contingency plans. He said he was "not sanguine" about the
prospect of Britain being adequately prepared for future outbreaks of
serious animal diseases.
"Globalisation has vastly increased the danger
from viruses previously unknown in the UK," ... "The government should draw
up "rules of engagement" now for outbreaks of each potential disease, so
there is no repeat of the furious arguments seen last year over whether
culling or vaccination should be used to beat foot-and-mouth"....
At
least Ulster TV has
reported this meeting between the Chairman of the London Royal Society
Inquiry and the EFRA committee.
Oct 17 ~ "You will remember my letter expressed grave concerns on the
credibility of the Cumbrian FMD Inquiry chaired by Prof. Thomas."
wrote Nick Green today to the chief executive of Cumbria County Council.
"As of today, I have yet to receive any reply from you and am concerned that
this matter will drag on indefinitely. The Cumbrian FMD Inquiry has been a
waste of Council Tax payers' money and I believe that Cumbrians deserve an
explanation immediately...." The letter
Oct 17 ~ "We want to stop cruelty, encourage good welfare and avoid the
trap of excessive legislation"
said Elliot Morley - (without falling dead on the spot) - about the
proposed new bill which will cover "the welfare of all farmed, wild or
exotic animals in captivity and animals used for entertainment or sport."
The exclusions from this, no doubt well-meaning, protection are interesting.
The proposed bill fights shy of dealing with hunting, intensively farmed
chickens and pigs and does nothing to protect animals used for
experimentation and vivisection. Nor, of course, will it have any bearing on
the legislation in the Animal Health Bill - referred to by the Bishop of
Hereford as a "sinful
bill" - to make easy and retrospectively legal the slaughter of any
animals the Minister chooses to suspect of being in the vicinity of
disease.
With ghastly humour Mr Morley told a press conference, "This
is not an animal rights bill, it's modern, streamlined animal welfare
...it's not a bill that gives your cat the right to sue you if it doesn't
get the comfy chair next to the fire and 10 snacks a day..." Animal
welfare is a concept understood by all decent people of all time. Even if
the motive behind this bill is sincere, to suggest that the notion of
treating animals with consideration is modern or streamlined
is extraordinary. (If only there were a bill to protect the integrity of the
English Language from oleaginous political clichi.)
Read the Reuters report
Oct 17 ~ "Our purpose is to make the public aware of the Bill and its far
reaching implications..."
Sue Burton here
writes on behalf of the Remus Memorial Horse Sanctuary Animal
Legislation Information Group with pleas for anyone who can to raise public
awareness of this loathed bill. "The Lords will now consider the information
received from the Report Stage which has been scheduled for the 22nd and
29th of October and the 4th of November leaving time for the Bill to become
law by the end of the parliamentary session in five weeks time.
It was
very clear from speaking to the public outside Westminster during our
demonstration that they are totally unaware that the Bill exists nor of the
implications of the legislation that is proposed.
Indeed Lord Mitchell
who stopped to speak with us before going into the House to vote with the
Government said that the public were no longer concerned about Foot and
Mouth. We disagree with this and argue that the problem is that the
legislation is being brought through without the knowledge of the public
behind the smokescreen of the ban on hunting....."
Oct 16 ~" we are trying to show government that the rule is draconian and
will not be tolerated"
David Handley has said that the 20 day rule must go. Farmers for Action
are talking about destroying licence forms, marching on Page St and even
blocking roads - if necessary. See Isabel Davies' article in
FWi
A survey published yesterday shows that one in 12 Cumbria farmers
intends to leave farming. Only 50% of owner-occupiers and 34% of tenants
expect a family member to take over the business. 14% of farmers intend to
sell off assets to keep their businesses viable, says the report. Keswick
farmer and National Farmers' Union county chairman Will Cockbain, also
quoted in the Farmers
Weekly Interactive, says that if a survey were carried out after the
impact of the 20-day rule on the main autumn selling period it would show
even more livestock farmers ready to quit...
Oct 15 ~ 'It is vital that we face up to the mistakes made.. that there is
adequate consultation .. a promise from ministers to deal with disasters
through proper planning - not the incomprehensible panic we saw'
The In the Shadow
exhibition starts in Stroud, although Julia hopes that it may be taken
to city areas where she believes there has always been a certain level of
ignorance. 'In the main, many urban people have been unaware of the
lingering effects of foot and mouth on country communities. The horrors live
on for many people whose lives were all but broken.'
Julia explained '
The foot and mouth epidemic affected me deeply, and the repercussions will
reverberate for years'. She has seen hardened farmers break down over the
futile loss of their animals, in some instances prize breeding stock that
has taken generations to build up. Frustrated by the inability to be heard,
Julia hopes the exhibition will be a way of telling stories of the past
months both to her local community and to people whose lives have not been
directly touched by the crisis.
'It is vital that we face up to the
mistakes made, and that there is adequate consultation with the farming
community, and a promise from ministers to deal with disasters through
proper planning - not the incomprehensible panic we saw'.
Oct 15 ~" the farmer is being reduced to an automated machine, controlled
by someone who has no idea at all - I would like to see more decisions taken
at a local level by people who know what they are talking about"
The North
Devon Journal has managed to insert some very wise words from Lawrence
in the middle of an article on playing classical music to sheep. "Government
regulations imposed on small producers are more applicable for the
commodities supplier - the larger the operation, the easier it is to be
anonymous. But meeting your customer face to face is the most efficient
accountability system."
The politics of farming are inescapable, and
Karen said they caused "daily stress." Both said they were frustrated that
the regulations they are forced to adhere to are manufactured by people in
the city who don't understand country living.
Lawrence commented: "A
farm is an unpredictable environment and many of the regulations don't take
that into account."
As an example, he said manufacturers' instructions
on how to put ear tags into a fully-grown bull, which is a legal government
requirement, were 'laughable'.
It is a task fraught with problems: "They
don't take into account the fact that your bull may be in a bad mood that
day, and has no intention of getting his ears pierced."
"I would like to
see more decisions taken at a local level by people who know what they are
talking about, because the farmer is being reduced to an automated machine,
controlled by someone who has no idea at all."
Oct 15 ~ DEFRA's proposals could mean that the risk of a foot-and-mouth or
Swine Fever outbreak would increase 100,000-fold
Farmers' Weekly
interactive reports that the large quantities of catering and other feed
waste, available to the pig industry before last year's ban on swill, will
be spread on farmland.
"Defra has published a risk assessment suggesting
that the composting procedure could present lower risks to animal health
than the current process of disposal to landfill. But former swill plant
operators say it is more dangerous than the original heat-treatment process,
which sterilised material before it was incorporated into animal feed. The
Associated Swill Users' Group and the UK Renderers' Association say it would
be almost impossible to accurately monitor composting temperatures and be
sure that all parts of the material had been heated continuously to 600C for
at least two days. If just 0.01% of waste wasn't properly treated, and was
applied to land and grazed in under two months, the risk of a foot-and-mouth
or Swine Fever outbreak would increase 100,000-fold.
Meanwhile, the
National Pig Association claims that rules preventing cannibalism in the EU
have been breached, with liquified pork fat included in some home mixed
rations. Imported pigmeat may therefore still contain meat and bone meal and
other porcine products which have been banned in the UK." See full article
Oct 15 ~" .....it is untrue that FMD did not hit East Anglia.
Most animals survived, but the processors were badly hammered. Derek
teaches at Otley Agricultural College where they got an ultimatum from
DEFRA: "You lose either all your animals or all your students." The animals
(goats, sheep, pigs and cows) went. They are not allowed to restock in the
middle of the college, where the farm used to be..." Hilary's diary
Oct 15 ~"The problem is the regulations".
Hilary's diary
continues. She says, "There is so much misunderstanding, misinformation and
ignorance about farming that even the word farmer means opposite
things to different people.
To me, it means someone who co-operates with
the land and animals to produce food. There are many ways of doing this."
"The problem is the regulations" I don't suppose any farmer would
disagree with that. This
journey is the story of people who have jumped through all the
bureaucratic hoops, cut through the red tape, and somehow reached the
public. During the years of five year plans, Russia lived off the people's
allotments and the tiny amounts of farming they did in their spare time.
There is the same desperation and the same determination to survive in
British farming now. (And by farming, I do not mean agri-business.)
Our
neighbour here has an exceptionally beautiful herd of Anglo-Nubian pedigree
goats and a cafi called the Dancing Goat in Framlingham. You might think the
goats would supply the cafi. No such luck. It would cost a fortune to
install the equipment Defra now requires. This is goats we're talking about.
They do not get most of the illnesses that make the authorities so jumpy
about cows' milk. In the mid-seventies in the middle of London, I was making
a cheese from my goats' milk and selling it to local health food shops! It's
another world....
.read
more
Oct 14 ~ As we all knew, firebreak culling as applied during 2001 was
illegal
Alan Beat writes, "DEFRA have just released a Disease Control
(Slaughter) Protocol document for "consultation". This is intended to
clarify and regulate the way in which slaughter will be applied during the
next FMD epidemic using the draconian powers now being sought in parliament
under the Animal Death Bill. We will spare you the whole document but
include here the most relevant extracts and our own response:
"4.
There are three sets of circumstances when animals may be required to be
slaughtered. These are:
- Animals affected or suspected of being affected.
- Animals which are believed to have been exposed to infection.
- To prevent the spread of disease, e.g. a 'firebreak' cull. (This
requires passage of the Animal Health Bill.)"
As we all knew, the
last point confirms that firebreak culling as applied during 2001 was
illegal
Oct 14 ~ There is no scientific basis to support the draconian provisions
of the Animal Death Bill - only the political desire to conceal and deny the
unmitigated disaster of 2001.
Alan Beat (see attached
response) writes, "We have slogged through the pages of Hansard in
near-disbelief at the lack of knowledge displayed by many of the
participants. Lord Whitty repeatedly refers to the Lessons Learned inquiry
as if this provided justification for last year's mass slaughter policies,
when he knows perfectly well that an analysis of the control methods used
was NOT within its remit.
The report's author, Dr Iain Anderson,
unquestioningly accepts and repeats information from government sources on
slaughter policy, without due consideration of the facts, of alternative
scientific opinion or of the data available worldwide.
He states in his
foreword "My job was not to conduct research into the mass of veterinary and
epidemiological data" but unfortunately he does not constrain himself from
making numerous recommendations on disease control policy - an extraordinary
and potentially dangerous situation, in our view. Government ministers are
pointing to these recommendations as justification for future policies, when
in fact no proper examination of policy as applied during 2001 has been
made.
Even the Royal Society, hamstrung by its own terms of reference to
look only forward to future outbreaks, cannot resist stating repeatedly that
no conclusions about the efficacy of the culling strategies employed in 2001
can be reached until the full data has been released into the public domain
and thoroughly studied.
There is, at present, no scientific basis to
support the draconian provisions of the Animal Death Bill - only the
political desire to conceal and deny the unmitigated disaster of 2001."
Oct 14 ~......After slaughter, even the birds did not sing. It was as if
the whole of the countryside was held in a silent invisible grip'.
See information about Julia Currie's exhibition "The Shadow of Foot and
Mouth" to be held at The Old Town Hall, the Shambles, Stroud,
Gloucestershire on Thursday 31st October to Saturday 2nd November from 9.30-
5.00 each day.
She writes, ".... the horrors live on, and many relive
their nightmare daily."
One farmer told Julia' a part of me died the day
my animals were killed'.
Oct 14 ~ Lord May of Oxford (and the Royal Society) calls the Animal
Health Bill "unbalanced" and says "contingency plans should be brought before
Parliament for debate and approval"
During the debate in the Committee Stage of the House of Lords last
week, Lord May said "For understandable reasons the Bill has been overtaken
by events; by subsequent excellent and insightful reports and probably by
actions in the EU.
We are debating only a part of a larger picture. I am
in favour of the amendment because I should like the word "reasonable" to
appear wherever possible, and more. I much appreciate the letters that have
been put around by the noble Lord, Lord Whitty, and the sensible things that
have been promised in regard to addressing some of the unanswered questions,
but I wish the powers over what is euphemistically called "preventive
slaughter" to be similarly spelled out for "vaccination to live".
In
particular, I support the recommendations of the Royal Society report--with
which I am considerably familiar, understandably -- that contingency plans
should be brought before Parliament for debate and approval. The Government
should bring before Parliament a framework for the contingency plans which
covers the principles that will be involved in handling outbreaks of such
diseases in future and which looks across the broad spectrum, rather than
the understandable but, by virtue of its history, imbalanced Bill that is
before us..." See the whole debate on October 7/8. This is a long file - but can
then be "searched" as a whole for key words.( Loads in new window )
Oct 13 ~ Government sued over foot and mouth bill
Telegraph
"Dozens of firms plan to take legal action against the Government because
they are still owed millions of pounds for clean-up work during last year's
foot and mouth crisis. More than 100 contractors have not been paid for
invoices totalling more than £400 million, according to the Government's own
figures. Many told The Telegraph that they would have to go to court or face
bankruptcy.
The companies accused the Government of failing to honour
contracts signed 18 months ago when ministers urged them to halt the spread
of disease....."more
Has Snowie
Ltd been paid in full, one wonders?
Oct 13 ~ No BSE risk from sheep
Telegraph
Letter
"Is Sir John Krebs being serious when he writes: "The simple
fact is that no one knows if BSE is in sheep and we are seeking to reduce
that uncertainty" (Letters,
Sep 29)? Whatever does that mean?
He continues, "Sheep intestines
could constitute a significant risk if BSE were to be found in the national
flock." Who says? Not, I can reassure him, Brussels scientists, who have
concluded there is no need to add sheep intestines to the list of specified
risk materials.
When will those who advise and pontificate accept that
BSE is a disease of cattle, scrapie is a disease of sheep, and CJD is a
disease of humans? We have quite enough food scares without Sir John adding
another that no one knows about.
From: Peter Ashley, Hertford,
Hertfordshire "
Oct 12 ~ 20-day standstill rule -"We are on the wrong road"
Vic Robertson's article in today's Scotsman says that many vets are now
"..calling for a relaxation of the law, which is intended to prevent the
spread of disease.
David Henderson, former head of clinical studies and
farms director at the Moredun Research Institute, Edinburgh is a leading
critic of the rule. He said: "We are on the wrong road with 20 days. It does
not fit in well with established patterns of sheep farming, with seasonal
movements from the hills and uplands to the lowlands and the complex pattern
of sales particularly at this time of year. It also pushes up costs, notably
for multiple examinations by vets." Read article
One
farmer's comment: "The 20 day standstill really is a nonsense. Defra seem
quite happy for cattle to be moved around the country without first testing
for TB which is rife - but for a virus (fmd) long departed we are lumbered
with this ridiculous restriction. We apparently are discriminated against
whilst tons of meat with no traceability is allowed to enter this country
unchallenged save for two dogs sniffing around ..."
Hundreds have
declared, in a telephone poll organised by Farmers' Guardian, that they
would defy the 20-day rule in the future.
Oct 12 ~ Warmwell will now have to pause while the computer is mended
No one locally can mend the warmwell laptop and it will have to be sent
away. Sincere apologies. Daily updates will return as soon as circumstances
permit.
Oct 10 ~ AN IMPORTANT NEW WEBSITE, very highly recommended and now being
developed.
The Warmwell computer has hardware problems which will involve expensive
repairs. We apologise for this break in our coverage and will return as soon
as possible. In the meantime, please make the excellent and authoritative Land-Care.org your first
port of call. Information about this website with its emphasis on the
science and practice of agricultural matters can be seen here or go
direct to the site
(new window).
The website's editor, Dr James Irvine (FRSE DSc FRCPEd
FRCPath FInstBiol), was previously a member of the Royal Society of
Edinburgh FMD Inquiry that reported on 15th July 2002.
See Dr Irvine's response to
the EU Temporary Committee draft document on FMD
Oct 9 ~ Warmwell computer in trouble again
Apologies to all. The warmwell computer is only able to operate for a
few moments before crashing. Then it refuses to boot up again for several
hours. It is likely that there will be some delay before the next update.
Both up-to-date Norton and Zone Alarm are working. Any advice will be
gratefully received.
In the meantime, we would urge anyone who can to
contact BBC Farming Today to see if they intend to cover EFRA's meeting with
Brian Follett on 16th October and also to ask them to push for more coverage
on vaccination.
Oct 9 ~ Lord Whitty simply doesn't know what he is talking about - and no
one in the Lords was able to refute him
Warmwell finds it astonishing and depressing that Lord Whitty maintained
that the government had been given the go-ahead for the slaughter bill by
the Inquiries. He quoted in his statement the one
or two highly ambiguously worded extracts that might possibly give that
interpretation - but only if read out of context. As for his refusal to
understand the vital importance of Uruguay's example as a country that
eradicated the disease and his continuing clinging to the lie that there are
still complications over vaccination and rapid diagnosis tests - we despair.
Most of the Lords who made such a valiant effort to inject common sense into
the debate had apparently not been briefed by any experts in state of the
art FMD vaccination and testing. It is a tragedy for the UK.
And it is
amazing that the cull is still debated as if it can be justified. Cattle and
sheep should have been vaccinated in the first place. When it was realised
at last that the disease had taken hold and was technically "out of
control", barriers should have been created by creating zones of immune
animals through vaccination.
All concerned should read the reports
of the Royal Societies of London and Edinburgh. It's all there.
It seems
that we will have to live with this type of Janus back-watcher who will
never be convinced even by the strongest scientific arguments about the
disease, and yet these people are directing our policies and the nodders in
the House of Commons will not give their motives a second thought. The
problem is that in Britain we have far more than our fair share. They wish
to legitimise slaughter policies that were illegal, it is as simple as that.
We feel very dispirited about the whole thing - the more incorrect, the more
obdurate.
Oct 9 ~ "more of the same - or worse" ..The refusal of the UK Government
to change future policy in its desperation to cover up past mistakes
"We have sensed for a long time now that the UK government will refuse
to change future policy in its desperation to cover up past mistakes. In
confirmation of this, Professor David King stated on camera during our
recent interview that a future outbreak will be met with slaughter and
contiguous culling at the least, while he hinted strongly that more
draconian pre-emptive slaughter to 1.5 km radius or more would be seriously
considered. In other words, more of the same - or worse. He flatly refused
to recommend the use of vaccination until a series of further scientific and
political hurdles had been overcome. His reputation, perhaps his job, is at
stake and he will not risk backing down from the rigid line that was his all
along; the politicians, even the PM, have simply danced to his tune. He has
stuck his neck out for Roy Anderson, John Krebs and others within the Royal
Society inner circle, and he is not going to yield an inch until forced to
do so by higher authority.
That authority can only be a Directive from
the EU - hence our considerable efforts to influence the outcome of the
Committee of Inquiry." Alan Beat in his newsletter from http://www.smallholders.org/
Oct 9 ~ 20-day rule to remain in force in perpetuity.....deluge of
consultation, debate and "independent" risk assessments are all nothing more
than a sham - the pretence of democracy"
"Another instance of the power wielded by this one man (David King) is
the permanence of the 20-day rule on livestock movements. This restriction
has been the subject of intense pressure from all sectors of farming, the
livestock marketing industry and the veterinary profession. The resulting
deluge of consultation, debate and "independent" risk assessments are all
nothing more than a sham - the pretence of democracy that we have come to
recognize so well - when in reality the decision has already been taken by
David King. He told us that it was his firm personal recommendation to the
Prime Minister for the 20-day rule to remain in force in perpetuity, and he
made clear that there was no room for manoeuvre on this issue. This from a
government publicly committed to openness and transparency on scientific
issues . . . ." Alan Beat in his newsletter from http://www.smallholders.org/
Oct 9 ~ Lord Moran "I am astonished that under the huge weight of
criticism in your Lordships' House and outside, the Government should still be
keen on a policy of mass slaughter."
"the central features of this part of the Bill remain unchanged". I read
that with despair. I said on Second Reading on 14th January that the Bill
might more appropriately be entitled the "Animal Slaughter Facilitation
Bill". On 26th March and 25th July, I said that Part 1 was, "based entirely
on legalising and extending the mass slaughter of animals".
I am
astonished that under the huge weight of criticism in your Lordships' House
and outside, the Government should still be keen on a policy of mass
slaughter. Little wonder that Dr. Anderson called in the lessons to be
learned report for a "reappraisal of prevailing attitudes and behaviours"
within DEFRA. The Government and the department seem determined not to
listen to their critics. Help is at hand. I am not an enthusiast of the
European Union -- I would be much happier if we came out of it -- but we
belong for the present. Agriculture is one of the areas for which we have
handed over responsibility to Brussels -- which has, it seems, decided to
take over the running of foot and mouth policy from the UK and other member
states. ... an interim
report has been published by the rapporteur of the EU temporary
committee on foot and mouth.
"The mass slaughter policy employed to control foot-and-mouth disease
last year was based on flawed scientific models and probably did not help
curb the epidemic".
The policy was said to have,
"dubious legal grounds and may have led to animal welfare abuses".
The committee makes a number of recommendations, including
"vaccination as a 'first choice' control option in future".
It
added that
"some farmers were intimidated and pressurised into having animals
culled".
I would normally be reluctant to see responsibility moved from
London -- where we can at least put our views to the Government, however
little attention they pay --to Brussels, where we have no influence. In this
instance, I admit that in contrast to an invincibly obstinate British
Government bent on making mass slaughter easier, the European Parliament's
committee seems to be taking a much more enlightened view -- almost
identical with that of the Royal Society, laying the main emphasis on
emergency vaccination-to-live...." (see Lords Hansard)
Oct 9 ~ Earl of Onslow "a blind, ignorant, witchcraft-driven policy"
".... Unless people pay attention to what is happening, things will go
on getting worse. Thank goodness we are now considering vaccination. We will
never again slaughter God knows how many animals in a blind, ignorant,
witchcraft-driven policy.
The more I see of the amendments to the Bill,
the more I want to say to the Minister that he should take the Bill away and
come back with a proper one next time. I see that he is looking
uncomfortable: so he should. He is now grinning because he does not want to
admit that he is uncomfortable. We want a proper Bill. I say that to help
the Government, not to cause them difficulties. We want the things that my
noble friend Lady Byford said were necessary. We want some of the things
that the noble Lord, Lord Livsey of Talgarth, mentioned. The Government
admit that we want them, but they are all over the place. The changes will
come in on Report and at Third Reading but, because the Bill will have been
half-chewed in this House, it will have to go back to another place, where
they will not have time to do what is needed. That is a crazy way to
legislate.
The Government must be big enough to say, "We have made a
mistake, and we want to do it better. Our aim is the same as yours, and some
of us think that there are better ways of achieving it".
Oct 9 ~ Lord Livsey of Talgarth: "... I was so distressed about what was
happening. Local knowledge is vital ..."
I commend in particular the noble Baroness's remarks about local
knowledge. It is vital. In 2001, I was greatly distressed by the fact that
local knowledge was completely overridden. People who knew a great deal
about their locality -- about how much livestock were here, there and
everywhere else -- were not consulted. That included myself and I forced
myself on to the scene at one point because I was so distressed about what
was happening. Local knowledge is vital ...
Oct 8 ~ Yesterday's Animal Health Bill (Committee stage) debate in the
House of Lords ( in full)
may be read
here.Extract: "As it stands, the Bill deals only with slaughter; it does
not deal with any other options. That is something we should look at. The
reports deal also with the way in which the State Veterinary Service
operated and with alternative measures. They were reinforced by the European
Parliament's recently produced Working Group 5a report,
of which other noble Lords have had copies. Paragraphs 50, 54 and 57 of that
report--I could refer to many more--highlight the question of vaccination
and how it should fit into some kind of animal health protection or animal
health legislation.
Paragraph 50 refers to the fact that the decision on
vaccination is in any case not a purely scientific matter but a political
one, and yet we are being asked today to give approval to issues about which
we need to talk more broadly than we are able to with the Bill as it stands.
Paragraph 54 states that vaccinations are available which make it possible,
at least on a herd by herd basis, to distinguish between infected and
vaccinated animals. When we debated the Bill in March it was not said
that it was possible to do that. It now is --and yet we still have the same
Bill..." Baroness Byford
Comment later.
Oct 8 ~ The cattle were neither tested nor culled on the same farms as the
sheep that gave positive serology tests
"After the 30th of September antibody positive sheep flocks were culled
on the basis that these were past infections, and therefore one could reason
these were not IPs (!)
(This interpretation would not interfere with the
3 month period of waiting for OIE FMD-free status that Jim Scudamore had
applied for).
There have been 40 to 50 of such flocks. The cattle were
neither tested nor culled on the same farms as the sheep that gave positive
serology tests according to Jim Scudamore (personal communication). I
strongly suspect that these are not included as DEFRA have been determined
not to call these IPs at all: No new IPs were published after 30th
September..." writes Dr
Watkins
October 8 ~ "... to justify killing contiguous premises."
See Ruth Watkins' analysis of the answer to a parliamentary question
tabled by Mrs Beckett 8th January 2002. "Because the figures are not
clarified for the CPs and the DCs one can attempt no more than an overall
view. It is likely that the CPs tested were fairly early in the epidemic,
probably in one place, perhaps Cumbria, and may have been triggered by
undisclosed events and motivations such as to justify killing contiguous
premises.
As you can see from the notes, 120 CPs tested positive, and
218 tested negative, altogether 338 must have been sampled (not just 218)
- it should be 3425 CPs altogether.
The laboratory negative
farms in the IP column
must be clinical misdiagnoses, roughly 30 %. (It has been previously
published that sheep suspected of FMD have a 50% likelihood of having
something else -- no samples were taken from sheep for virus infections
other than FMD; these would have to be sent to a different laboratory.)
..See additional
material from Dr Ruth Watkins with reference to her recommendations to
the EU to prevent a recurrance of the 2001 FMD disaster.
Oct 8 ~ The table shows just what excessive carnage took place
Part of the additional material supplied
by Dr Ruth Watkins is the table provided by DEFRA in answer to
Parliamentary Question PQ 2164 by Peter Ainsworth on 20th November
2001
9461 is the total number of farms to have their animals slaughtered
by the FMD policy. 1328 is the number of farms with a positive laboratory
result. The table shows how many farms without evidence of FMD were "killed
out" in each area as a result of the few that had positive results. In
Wigtown 216 farms had their animals slaughtered. There were just two
positive results returned.
Oct 8 ~ the government will drop plans in the AHB to reduce compensation
levels to 75%
Report from Hansard will be put on warmwell as soon as possible. The
Guardian today says, "Lord Whitty also bowed to farmers' concerns saying
he will strengthen rights of appeal for farmers seeking to block government
officials entering their farms or enforcing a compulsory vaccination or
slaughter policy. The requirement to provide assistance to government
officials will be restricted to keepers of the stock.
He said he will
strengthen the conditions the government will have to meet when justifying
entry to a magistrate. .."
We can only gape at sentences such as :
"A full scale review of the compensation system for farmers caught up
in animal disease outbreaks, such as foot and mouth, is to be undertaken
by government amid signs it is not willing to underwrite the costs of such
an outbreak again"
since it was ineptitude at the highest level and a
stubborn refusal to accept expert advice that resulted in the financial cost
of the FMD crisis reaching three billion pounds - not to mention the
knock-on eight billion pounds lost to the tourist industry. Vaccination to
live would have saved millions of pounds and millions of animals; it would
have preserved trust in DEFRA - now irrevocably lost, and it would have
prevented the continuing fear and trauma among the people most affected. And
still the government persists in blaming farmers and wriggles away from
renewed calls for an independent public Inquiry .
Oct 8 ~ Animal Health Bill Committee Stage continues in House of Lords
today - "The scientific basis of the Bill is seriously flawed. More research
needs to be done"
Oct 8 ~ "There has got to be a drive to reduce red tape" Lidington
See FWi
"Tory rural affairs spokesman David Lidington has called for animal movement
restrictions to be reduced from 20 days to six. Mr Lidington said standstill
rules preventing farmers from selling animals for 20 days after stock are
brought onto a farm, were intolerable. ....
Policy makers had to stop
loading regulations onto farmers and the 20-day rule was a good example of
one regulation that should be relaxed, said Mr Lidington.
"There is an
overwhelming case for that limit to be reduced," he told a fringe meeting at
the Conservative Party Conference on Monday (7 October). "It is arrogant in
the extreme for government to be lecturing farmers on biosecurity when they
have failed to maintain biosecurity at ports and airports."
A six-day
restriction on movements would be a compromise between disease protection
and normal market movements... "We have to help reconnect farmers with their
customer and part of that is to get government off farmers' backs,"
he said. "There has got to be a drive to reduce red tape."
Oct 8 ~The chief executive and assistant chief executive of the British
Veterinary Association have left their posts.
Robert Uhlig writes in today's
Telegraph "James Baird, chief executive for 15 years, and Ailsa Edwards,
who had been with the association for 10 years, had been the subjects of
three inquiries, costing more than £60,000, into allegations
concerning their behaviour towards staff.....
....there were "a lot
of happy faces" among staff at the BVA's Mansfield Street offices following
the pair's departure.
...The sudden change at the top of the BVA ended a
year of turmoil, which culminated in 16 former presidents, whose tenures
dated from the Fifties to the Nineties, writing to the Veterinary Record,
the association's official publication, over their concerns. They said a
lack of transparency over the findings of two independent inquiries into the
allegations was tearing the profession apart and damaging its
reputation."
Oct 7 ~ DEFRA has admitted that the number of laboratory confirmed cases
of FMD infection is lower than the much publicised number of 2030
Dr Ruth Watkins, the eminent virologist, has sent a summary of her
recommendations to the EU :" .. that each EU country has a modern
automated computerised virus laboratory to diagnose a number of different
viruses...The consultant veterinary virologist shall be responsible for
interpreting the laboratory results and issuing a printed report for each
specimen ...During an epidemic this good laboratory practice is sustained
and the consultant veterinary virologist (not a DEFRA ministry official) is
to be consulted by veterinarians in the field regarding diagnosis of
infection. Also, the consultant is responsible for supplying accurate data
on infection based on laboratory results to the epidemiologists (e.g. DEFRA)
on a daily basis.
However as we know this did not happen in the UK
during the FMD epidemic. The UK government (DEFRA) has admitted that the
number of laboratory confirmed cases of FMD infection is rather lower than
the much publicised number of 2030 which contains all those that were
clinically diagnosed but tested negative in the laboratory- thus proven not
to be FMD cases. The number of cases confirmed by the detection of evidence
for FMD infection in the laboratory was 1328." See Dr Watkins'
recommendations to the EU
Oct 7 ~ It was Mrs Beckett who claimed ... that she had never heard of a
bungled cull in the Devon parish of Knowstone....
"Now the Western
Morning News is challenging Mrs Beckett's ineptitude. All this week we
will be highlighting the problems faced by rural communities and examining
the ways in which they can be solved, in other words doing Mrs Beckett's job
for her.
We have come up with a list of five main issues
in the countryside that need to be targeted, and we asked experts what the
way forward holds......"
Oct 7 ~".. the Government must make "big decisions" to safeguard the
future of rural life"
Professor Michael Winter, director of the Centre for Rural Research at
Exeter University, has called on the Government to make "big decisions" to
safeguard the future of rural life.
"The Government has dedicated a lot
of time to rural issues, but it certainly doesn't seem to be getting across
to rural areas," he added. "Foot and mouth, and the criticisms that the
Government was ham-handed with its treatment of the crisis, has been one of
the reasons for the lack of trust from the rural community."
Prof Winter
said that the Government must lead by example to win back the rural
community's trust. Lending support to the WMN's Buy Local campaign, Prof
Winter said that one avenue could be through greater promotion of home-grown
produce.
"We really need to get some kind of commitment to them putting
money into regional food. It's quite possible that people might start to
feel that bit more trusting of the Government if it led from the front.
"They should make their own agencies - the Department of Health, the
National Health Service, the Ministry of Defence - eat British. They should
not be buying the cheapest beef on the market, but go that extra yard to
protect the rural economy. It would send such a strong message out to rural
areas, and it would be an amazing show of confidence." See article from today's
WMN
Oct 7 ~ Animal Health Bill Committee Stage continues in House of Lords
today - "The scientific basis of the Bill is seriously flawed. More research
needs to be done"
Read Dr Szamuely's
paper on recent developments:
"DEFRA has indicated that HMG will
reply in detail to the Lessons Learned and the Royal Society inquiries later
in the year. Lord Whitty's letter of September 25 confirms this, suggesting
that the responses are due "in late October or early November". DEFRA's own
putative timetable puts it even later.
The House will not,
therefore, be able to study the detailed responses until November at the
earliest.
The idea of picking out some of the points raised, mixing and
matching them and then pushing through a complicated and difficult piece of
legislation on that basis, reinforces the feeling that DEFRA's thinking
remains over-hasty.
The Government must concentrate on having better
contingency plans and on recruiting and training more members of the state
veterinary service.
- More attention must be paid to scientific research in other member
states of the European Union and North America. A new Bill to amend the
1981 Act and to deal with TSE and scrapie must be based on careful
attention on up-to-date scientific work rather than inadequate
assumptions.
- More attention should be paid to illegal importation of meat. While it
is not entirely clear whether that was the original cause of the outbreak,
there is no doubt that funds and training are not sufficient to stem that
particular flood. The Minister has promised to deal with it but no details
of funds allocated or intended staffing have been announced.
- The various reports, those mentioned in the original amendment, others
produced in this country and the one due from the Temporary Committee of
the European Parliament must be studied in detail and HMG's reply should
be discussed adequately. Details of the proposed animal health and welfare
strategy should be outlined with clear indication where the Animal Health
Bill and the contentious SI843, passed in the spring, will fit into it.
- Since EU legislation will have to be enforced, it is incumbent on HMG
to admit this, to wait till the legislation is presented and formulate
laws and regulations in the UK on that basis.
Read more
Oct 6/7 ~ "the cruelty to people that has made strong silent Englishmen,
normally the last bastions of the 'stiff upper lip' brigade, break down and
cry in public..."
Val Lusmore (see her widely praised paper on the flawed
mathematical modelling) was the speaker at the Harvest Festival at
Ampney St Mary in Gloucestershire: " I spoke of who we are, of how we came
together over FMD, many of us on the internet, and how we were drawn into
the first standoff at Oaklands Park, and then in the Forest of Dean -
familiar territory to many of the congregation. I spoke of the remarkable
achievements and of what we still need to achieve, and I added some personal
comments of what drew me personally into feeling that we could not let this
go - above the cruelty and suffering of the animals - how I have spent 18
months of my life seeing the cruelty to people that has made strong silent
Englishmen, normally the last bastions of the 'stiff upper lip' brigade,
break down and cry in public every time I have been to any kind of event -
these people who would never cry, not even at funerals. This is still one of
the most heart wrenching things I have ever seen...." Read Val's address and hand-out to
the congregation.
Hand-out extract
- We need to continue to campaign to stop the Animal Health Bill which
is not founded on substantive scientific or empirical data and information
- We need access to the actual epidemiological data about Foot and Mouth
which can be independently and honestly analysed so that there will be
Lessons Learned; preferably we need a proper independent and transparent
public enquiry.
- We need sustainable agriculture and food production which protects the
unique countryside of the UK and ensures the survival of a rich and
diverse environment, a thriving rural economy and dynamic communities.
"
Oct 6/7 ~"..they were all listed as 'Dexters' (nearly 'Devon' I suppose)
and the bull was 'female'
Read Lawrence's message about his far from hilarious misadventures with
the British Cattle
Movement Service [BCMS] and the Rural Payments Agency [RPA]. "... My
application to join the Beef Assurance Scheme threw up the requirement that
all my cattle should be adorned with two eartags. The oldest three, being
pedigree Devons, had survived so far with the Devon Cattle Breeders' Society
tattoos, and no eartags. Tagging them [apart from being fairly hazardous -
you try persuading a bull weighing about a ton to allow you to drive sharp
objects through not one but two ears!] required a new-style number.
After consultation with the BCMS the numbers were allocated - and BCSM
promised to send new-style passports to go with the new numbers. I tagged
the animals and lived to tell the tale - just...
The passports arrived a
few days ago. The dates of birth of the cattle were correct - but they were
all listed as 'Dexters' [nearly 'Devon' I suppose] and the bull was
'female'.
" ...the consequences of the mistakes are so far reaching, and
the systems require so many disparate actions to be completed correctly,
received correctly and entered in the correct register - and so on - that
the likelihood of a mistake occurring is unacceptably high."
Oct 6/7 ~ "local branches never meet now. They don't even exist. But the
NFU president himself can relax. If he "keeps his nose clean" and doesn't make
waves, he could find himself in the next Honours List. It is the usual
thing."
(Sunday Telegraph letter)
"As a National Farmers' Union (NFU) member of 54 years, and a former
branch chairman, I was amused by the dismissive response (Letters,
September 29) from the NFU's Director-General (no less!) to Christopher
Booker's splendid article (News,
September 22).
What has happened to the NFU in the past year or two
is that there has been an almost complete erosion of democratic principles.
"Director-General", indeed. This high-faluting title is duplicated by
"Regional-Directors" and, under them, "Policy-Directors". What has happened
to the annual general meeting, at which NFU policies were democratically
determined?
Well, er, there is a sort of annual "conference", but county
branch executive meetings are a thing of the past. And local branches never
meet now. They don't even exist. But the NFU president himself can relax. If
he "keeps his nose clean" and doesn't make waves, he could find himself in
the next Honours List. It is the usual thing...."
Oct 6/ 7 ~ It was the EU FOOD & VETERINARY OFFICE that recommended the
3km/contiguous cull
to "get ahead of the disease." This recommendation occurred after their
visit to the UK 12-16 March 2001.
Nick Green wonders how far
the Cumbria Inquiry, which said, "..the evidence seems to suggest that the
duration of the epidemic was reduced as the ratio of exposed premises
culled to infected premises culled increased. " can be thought to have
provided good value at £95,000 when they so conveniently ignore this fact.
The EU draft document was in no real doubt in spite of its diplomatic
language: "It remains controversial and doubtful whether the 24/48 hour
contiguous cull strategy was really responsible for curbing the
epidemic."
Oct 6/7 ~ Will there ever be an apology?
An emailer writes, "Now that the EU thinks we screwed up. What about
Anderson, Donnelley and Ferguson, the architects of the killing of 10
million animals? Didn't Ferguson get a OBE at
Christmas? Are these so called scientists, including King, going to say
sorry we got it wrong?
I don't think so..."
After this they will press
ahead with the dubious science and get through the animal health bill. Its
all a bloody joke. It will be interesting to see what the NFU's reaction
will be .
Oct 6/7 ~ Whole villages are rebelling against current trends.
Writes Hilary Peters in her E-Diary, soon to be published on warmwell.
"One is 'EARL SOHAM (Suffolk) : A MEDIUM SIZED VILLAGE WITH TWO FLOURISHING
SHOPS AND ITS OWN BREWERY'
The Post Office sells its own range of
pre-cooked meals, the local beer (Earl Soham) and cider (Aspal) on draught,
organic veg, local bread, including a potato loaf, fresh fish, and most
other essentials.
The butcher, John Hutton, under a large flag of St.
George, sells organic and free range meat from local farms, his own
sausages, and even milk which is as local as you'll get (from Marybell Dairy
in Walpole, which processes milk from East Anglian cows.)..." Hilary is
finding all kinds of enterprises to cheer us up. As she says, "the balance
of nature is asserting itself. Suffolk is in the middle of England's prairie
farming and it is here that the counter-revolution is most in evidence. I
daily come across individuals who are selling inventive organic products
direct to the public."
Oct 5 -7 ~ If you missed Farming This Week, (Saturday 5th Oct) on the EU
draft document,
click
this audio link with MEP Caroline Lucas and dairy farmer Nicola Morris.
Also Dick Sibley on the failure of the Krebs trials ) "I can't believe that
the same thing isn't going to happen again....It was so obvious what was
happening on our farm. We knew we were negative and so were so many others.
There has never been acknowledgement of this. Such a terrible waste. We
don't want to bang people over the head with "Why did you do this?" we just
want to make sure it doesn't happen again."
Oct 5 ~ Culling Policy "in vain"
The Westmorland
Gazette on the EU draft document on FMD:
"DRAFT findings from
European Parliament's inquiry into the foot-and-mouth epidemic last year
claim that the controversial contiguous culling policy which saw millions of
animals slaughtered may have been in vain. ... Its draft findings, published
this week, say "It remains controversial and doubtful whether the 24/48 hour
contiguous cull strategy was really responsible for curbing the epidemic."
... vaccination might have been used instead of the 24/48 culling and
that the presumption in EU policy against vaccination should be dropped in
its present form.
... According to committee members, vaccination was not
considered practicable by the British Government partly because of
opposition from NFU and the food trade. Some farmers, he report claims, were
against vaccination because of a "mistaken belief that EU law prohibited
payment of possible compensation for the possible loss of value of
vaccinated animals".
The draft report also remarks that: "Relatively
small special-interest groups (parts of the meat-producing farming sector
and the food trade) seem to have had an undue influence over decisions
affecting the well-being of whole regions in the management of the FMD
outbreak".
The committee also found that "considerable shortcomings" in
Britain's contingency plans had been identified as early as 1999, but
"hardly anything" had been done to rectify the situation before
foot-and-mouth struck in 2001. In the future, the report says, EU policy on
animal diseases should take into account lessons from 2001 on the "
psychological impact on the public and effect on non-agricultural sectors,
such as tourism."
Oct 5 ~ "they blundered and bungled their way through this disaster"
Western Morning News
editorial yesterday ".....on the big rural concerns affecting the rural
voters here and now she (Margaret Beckett) was totally, utterly and
unforgivably silent.
Her speech came, remember, only hours after a European Parliament committee
of inquiry issued the most damning indictment yet of the way the foot
and mouth crisis was dealt with by the British Government.
Why no
mention of that report on this public stage? Why not even an attempt by Mrs
Beckett to defend her department's record on foot and mouth or to answer the
European Parliament's charges about how they traumatised farmers and broke
animal welfare laws as they blundered and bungled their way through this
disaster?..."
Oct 5 ~ Have we all seen the new DEFRA Disease Control (Slaughter)
Protocol?
with its phrases such as "To prevent the spread of disease, e.g. a
'firebreak' cull as determined by the Secretary of State (as provided for in
the Animal Health Bill).... The third group is when the Secretary of State
has announced the need for a cull to prevent the spread of disease, e.g. a
'firebreak'. Such a decision by the Secretary of State would describe the
species, geographical area and, if appropriate, type of farming of the
cull.... "
See
DEFRA document.
DEFRA still ignores all rapid diagnosis tests and
still seems to want to depend on clinical diagnosis in an emergency - even
though the SVS has not been improved from the lamentable state of last year,
no one has been given any further training in disease recognition and the EU
draft document has refuted much upon which both the FMD policy and the
Animal Health Bill were based (see below). So what does
this utterly unbelievably incompetent Ministry think it is doing?
Oct 5 ~ Animal Health Bill Committee Stage in the House of Lords - Days 3
and 4
will be on October 7 and 8, 2002 . Our Westminster Correspondent
comments, "The bill remains seriously flawed despite the various amendments.
Why not have a better constructed one, introduced and debated at leisure
next session?" and directs us to this excellent, clear and constructive
discussion of the Animal
Health Bill by Dr Helen Szamuely of the Honest Food Campaign.
Extract "....It is fair to say that the data on developments during last
year's FMD was inaccurate and the scientific methodology was faulty. We
still have no clear idea of how many premises were actually infected as many
of the slaughtered out ones were subsequently declared not to have been
infected, yet the official figures were not changed.
The computer models
that led to the massive contiguous cull were faulty from the very beginning
as there is no clear knowledge as to the beginning of the epidemic. The
spread was far more rapid than it ought to have been because of the lengthy
distances travelled by animals and, in particular, because animal movement
was stopped two days after exports were.
All this historic background is
necessary for the understanding of the major faults in the Bill. Because of
all these problems, because of the criticisms raised in the various reports,
it is necessary to rethink the approach to the way animal disease epidemics
should be treated in the future."
The seven recommendations at the end
of the paper are of particular interest
Oct 5 ~ "...our wonderful Food Standards Agency has decided that after
slaughter, the spinal column (of cattle in the Beef Assured Scheme) can only
be removed in a specially licenced cutting plant - there is only one such
cutting plant in the whole of the UK.
More heartbreaking bureaucratic insanity uncovered by
Lawrence
".... Logic would lead one to expect that the animal thus
supervised and vouched for could be killed in your local abattoir, alongside
all the less assured animals which must be killed before they are 30 months
old.
Not a bit of it!
Our trusty bureaucrats still have to be bound
by EU directives which treat over 30 month old cattle as 'high risk'.
.....It took me about 10 'phone calls to different offices of DEFRA, the
SVS, the MLC, the RPA, etc.to find this out. Our local RPA and its 'Beef
Assurance Scheme section didn't seem to be able to tell me anything. Many of the persons I spoke to were audibly angry at the
disorganisation and crude centralisation of DEFRA and at the poorly
thought-out and poorly understood schemes and regulations they were called
upon to administer. I feel angry that the Beef Assurance Scheme is such a
useless sham, crushed by a sense of a weight of careless bureaucracy - and
impressed that all the staff I spoke to, telephonists included, are being
paid much more than almost any farmer in the UK." full email
Oct 5 ~ Who is Podger, what is he? ( FSA Board Meeting to be held in
BRUSSELS )
(From Europa Midday Express 2/10/02) "The Management Board of the
European Food Safety Authority today nominated Geoffrey Podger as its
Executive Director. The Chairman of the Board, Dr Stuart Slorach said : "I
am delighted" to announce that the Management Board had nominated Mr Podger
as the Executive Director.
This is an important step towards making the
European Food Safety Authority fully operational. But there is another step
before a formal appointment can be made as the nominated candidate will make
a statement to the European Parliament before being appointed".
It is
likely that Mr Podger will appear before the Environment Committee of the
European Parliament before the end of October. Mr Podger is at present, the
Chief Executive of the UK Food Standards Agency and has been responsible for
its establishment and development."
We note also that the UK Food
Standards Agency's Board is to hold (This
link appears not to work now) an open meeting in Brussels. Why? Does
anyone know?
Oct 5 ~ "We feared after seeing the video [the jury] would see it as an
animal welfare issue and not simply the health and safety issue it is..."
The man who took pot shots at the healthy ewes and lambs in order to
kill them all at Gilwern has been acquitted at Cardiff Crown Court. The Independent
reports, " Mr Walker's solicitor, Clive Rees, said: "We feared after
seeing the video [the jury] would see it as an animal welfare issue and not
simply the health and safety issue it is. They managed to divorce themselves
from the animal welfare issues. The right decision has been reached."
Is
anyone, apart from us, asking why this was NOT an animal welfare issue? Is
anyone questionning why it was brought to court as "simply" a health and
safety issue? Are the people of" Gilwern, who were so deeply upset by what
they saw, satisfied by the nature of the charge brought against Mr Walker?
Do they think the "right decision was reached"? Or do they, like us, despair
of British justice if it cannot even stand up for right against wrong in
such a clear situation as this?
Oct 4 ~ the future of the farmed landscape looks increasingly bleak
...after 18 mont"s of involvement with FMD "his is the picture which
increasingly comes into focus
writes Janet Bayley of the National Foot and Mouth Group. "Given the
scant comments of both Tony Blair and Margaret Beckett regarding agriculture
at the Labour Party Conference I wonder if it would be timely to ask has
this new department really joined up the dots, and can and does the
Government really appreciate the inter-dependent and inter-related nature of
the rural UK and its communit"es? ...
Already ungrazed pasture in the
wake of FMD is starting to change the appearance of the
countryside....Without sustainably farmed land; grazed, cropped or managed
in some other way, the face of the countryside will alter dramatically. As
it becomes unkempt and uncared for it is obvious to see that pressure for
land to be taken out of farming and used for housing and other development
will increase. Is this really the aim of the Dept of Food, Environment and
Rural Affairs? ....
.... the imbalance between health and welfare
standards of UK produced food and imported food - which leads to much
cheaper imports - the future of the farmed landscape looks increasingly
bleak, and with it the many related industries, not least tourism.
I do
not know how we seek reassurance from this administration, or any other,
that this will not be the outcome. As you will see from the accompanying Press Release issued a Year
on from Foot & Mouth after 18 months of involvement with FMD this is the
picture which increasingly comes into focus"
O"t 4 ~ "the almost oriental desire that this new governing class has to
save its own face in the aftermath of its own acts of incompetence... "
"...Since the Prince of Wales will one day, if God spares him, be king,
he hardly needs to engage in acts that further his ambitions. Yet to almost
all other politicians ambition is the prime motive force: the ambition"to do
something for your constituents so they re-elect you, or for the government
so the prime minister promotes you, or for your coll"ague"s so that they
vote for you one day to become their leader. Modern politics is the ultimate
proof that there is no such thing as the something-for-nothing society. " Simon
Heffer in this week's Spectator "....The old governing class was far
from perfect, and made some horrible errors in its time, but it usually made
them out of the best intentions, and not out of a desire to cling on to
power for the sake of personal gratification. Not all of what the Prince of
Wales says is entirely feasible, but we cannot dispute the purity of his
motives in saying it. Above all, that old governing class knew how to lead,
and understood the importance of taking responsibility. It recognised the
essential business of commanding the confidence of the led. That facet has
almost entirely disappeared from our public life at all levels.
"
"....The other day I was having lunch with a senior minister, and we
got on to the fiasco of last year's foot-and-mouth crisis. Without blinking,
he said it was the fault of the Civil Service. The old doctrine that
ministers take ultimate responsibility for what goes on in their departments
has been blown out of the water. " (Read
article)
Oct 4 ~ "It was reported that unnecessary pain and suffering had been
inflicted on animals because of the inexpert performance of staff, some of
whom were not adequately trained."(EU Draft report para 28)
"My shooting was safe.."protested Adrian Walker, the Gilwern killer of
panicking ewes and lambs."The amount of hassle caused for me and my family
is untold. I felt I did the best job I could in a difficult situation. It
was the best I could with what I was provided with. Hindsight is an awfully
good thing." We note that he is using the Margaret Beckett Defence.
As with Mrs Beckett and all others who refuse to accept responsibility for
what happened, the appeal that "they didn't know at the time" is chilling.
Even now, they just don't get it. They speak as if no one could possibly
have realised at the time that the brutal killing of evidently healthy
animals in cold blood was wrong - or could cause "welfare violations" (i.e
animals dying in extreme distress and pain).
The residents of Gilwern
who screamed were not worried that they were going to be next or that
bullets were going to "richochet".
The distraught elderly couple who
filmed Mr Walker were not doing so in order to complain about "Health and
Safety." Like so many who witnessed scenes of shocking carnage during the
so-called "culling" these people were aghast at the cruelty of what was
going on.
No one has been taken to court for cruelty. The cruelty to
both animals and humans has never been properly acknowledged in the UK
although certainly touched on in the EU draft report . The fact
that there have been no prosections is an indictment of both our government
and of what is still called the "Royal Society for the Protection of
Animals". (See also icWales
report of the trial)
Oct 3 ~ Norwich Livestock Market is being strangled by officious
bureaucracy
A very worrying article today from the Norfolk
Business site EDP24 suggests that petty and over-zealous officialdom is
so enraging farmers ( "We have got officers coming out of our ears," said
Peter Howell, chairman of Norwich Livestock Market ) that they are
simply not using the market at all.
The local head of Norfolk "Trading
Standards" said, in the manner of all little Hitlers everywhere, that
"certain standards had to be adhered to and procedures had to be
followed" He said it was the job of his officers to enforce the
provisions of the Animal Health Act" (which one?), and "since the
foot-and-mouth outbreak all animals had to be properly tagged and officers
had to check farmers were complying with the new rules...."
One does not
have to be a cynic to detect a strong wish among local officialdom that the
market should close. Rules and regulations are a subtle but highly effective
way of strangling farming and can always be piously defended as "the need to
be responsible". It was in this way that the small slaughter houses were
destroyed by the British Government - who so gold-plated the EU rules that
most simply went to the wall - with the result that animals now have to
travel long distances to slaughter - which is costly in terms of animal
welfare, in extra money paid by the farmer - and disastrous in terms of the
possible spread of disease.
In March the Norwich council announced the
livestock market could not stay open because of the costs of the new
"hygiene regulations" - but it was rescued by three farmers who set it up as
a private limited company. Now it is under severe threat again - and that
threat is coming from the officials. They are fully aware that their
nit-picking can have only one outcome among independent farmers who have
already had a bellyful of absurd regulations. We suspect that all this
over-zealousness is being well orchestrated. It is a disgrace. Once the Animal Health Bill is
made law - and who can stop it in its odious path? - there will be more of
this kind of thing. It has been suggested that Norfolk Trading Standards
have many questions to answer about their behaviour during the Classical
Swine Fever crisis. Peter Howell has said, "We will have to shut down if
they continue to be so difficult. Farmers do not take kindly to rules and
the officers have been so officious that they have decided not to sell their
sheep here anymore."
Oct 3 ~ Quotation of the day
"There is a sense of exhilaration that comes from facing head-on the
hard truths and saying, "We will never give up. We will never capitulate. It
might take a long time, but we will find a way to prevail."
-- Jim
Collins, from his book, Good to Great
Oct 3 ~"farmers are committing suicide at a rate of one every 11 days
according to the Countryside Alliance. The crisis persuaded some 29,000
people to leave their jobs in farming Farmers have also been affected by
European Union regulations, which they see as onerous. And supermarkets'
policy of buying products from huge farming operations, many of them abroad,
have helped drive many small Britishfarms o"ut of busi"ness..." (from an
"rticle in the International Herald
Tribune)
In Mr Blair's hour long speech at Blackpool he devoted a few
words only to the agricultural s"ecto, telling farmers that they must change
or face dire consequences. He said "I know the plight of the farming
comm"unity is srious. We are putting more money into it than the rest of
British industry combined..." But these are weasel words which give the
erroneous impression that burdens will be lifted from the hardest-up farmers
who will receive financial support. But of course they will not.
If only
our"out-of-its-de"t" governme"ntwould read and seriously consider the
sensible and"practical proposals in "A Better Cap" by the Family
Farmers Association.
Extract: "Many present regulations could be
removed or simplified. They are an added burden and make competition almost
impossible against the unfettered agribusinesses burgeoning in fast
developing countries. Those which demand record keeping only benefit
those most adept at writing fiction. They also distract attention from
the important aspects of farming -- ensuring that all stock and crops are
healthy. (A most simple example: the slaughter of all animals i"
automatically recorded by the farmer, the cattle tracing system and
the slaughterer. Why cannot the premiums be paid automatically, without
further farmer form filling?)"
"
Oct 3 ~" Why haven't the broad sheets covered it
- or Channel 4 - and as for Margaret Beckett at the Labour Party
Confer"n"e? Her only"mention of things rural is to stop subsidy and go
global - God help us...." writes an emailer" one person a" least who has
understood the significance of the latest email looks both forward and back.
Extract: "I
remember vividly listening to radio Cumbria one evening during the early
days of FMD. The show was called Nightline and was an opportunity for folk
to call in and talk about FMD etc. This particular night a lady farmer wife
rang in. She was in tears and almost screaming out. They had just killed all
her and her husband's Herdwicks in the Duddon Valley. She was heavily
distressed and spoke about the blood flowing down the fell side after the
kill. The bodies just dumped on the wet ground all over the fell side. She
was very concerned that her husband, an elderly man may never recover. That
was FMD 2001 in Cumbria..."
Re-reading the Lockerbie open meeting
with Dr Anderson arouses similar feelings of frustration and sadness,
feelings that are not getting any less acute as the months pass and no
official acknowledgement is made of the terrible mistakes that were made.
The testimonies - in the area hailed as having coped so much better
than England - show the determination of the people who were there to tell
their bitter tale and their hope that their words would not be ignored. The
reasoned crit"cisms, the desperation and pain, the utter disbelief at the
unrivalled incompetence - and th"ough it all"Dr Anderson's bland
reassurances that all would be taken into"account "...And if we cannot
altogether make a lasting difference, altogether we will have failed," he
said, "and I don't, and the inquiry team doesn't intend to be part of
that...."
Oc"t 3 ~ When will the dialogue begin?
" On the Countryside Alliance website that there is the reply
from Tony Blair to the Countryside
Alliance's letter to the Prime Minster from the CA Chairman, John
Jackson. On the question of FMD there is no mention of Royal Society Inquiry
report only "Lessons Learned" and Curry. So even toned down as it
undoubtedly was, the Royal
Society report was too critical? And the EU draft report?
"...it is
only through continuing dialogue, not confrontation, that we will genuinely
reach a consensus about the future," writes the Prime Minster to the CA.
We agree. When will the dialogue begin? Telling people is not
dialogue. "We need to fully explain our policies to all concerned..."
piped Mrs Beckett sententiously (and ungrammatically) to the MEPs. That is
not dialogue either. Explaining to "people concerned" who still suffer
nightmares that the FMD policy was something of a small triumph,
contemptuously denying that she had ever heard of the Knowstone horrors,
telling people who are heartbroken still at the suffering caused to their
animals that there were no welfare violations (Sept 12 ) - none of
this is dialogue either. She should watch the Gilwern video shown to
the jury at Cardiff Crown Court, showing an inexperienced butcher firing at
distances of 30 metres at terrified ewes and lambs. (see BBC report) There
seems to be no dialogue, no debate and no discussion from DEFRA on any
matter to do with farming. As Colin Breed MP , the Liberal Democrat Party's
spokesman for agriculture and rural affairs, has commented: "Mrs Beckett has
consistently refused to meet myself or my colleagues to discuss issues
relating to her portfolio, of which agriculture is a very important part.
She seems determined to close down any debate or discussion as something
which is the fault of globalisation and world markets and which in her
view has very little to do with her department. She is totally wrong about
that. "
Oct 2 ~ "Dreadful mess and suffering"
The long-awaited Draft report of the EU Temporary Committee on FMD
should have been reported fully on the front pages of all serious British
newspapers and a copy given to all members of Parliament.
Ken Tyrell,
the veteran veterinary surgeon involved at a senior level in both the 1967
and 2001 crises, whose clear and humane criticisms of the UK policy were
published on this website, comments, "..the EU has pronounced so forcibly
about the dreadful mess and suffering that MAFF and subsequently DEFRA made
in their shambles (using the word in the old meaning of lots of blood)
...."
The detail of the report speaks volumes. In vain did leading
proponents of the mass slaughter policy; Roy Anderson, David King, Lord
Whitty (who, according to Sean Poulter yesterday "visited the Committee
Chairman") and Margaret
Beckett, try to carry out a damage limitation exercise, attempting to
smooth over the cruelty and the flawed science. The Committee merely heard
them out with polite incredulity. They - unlike these politicians and
"scientists", had taken the trouble to listen to those involved, listened
and been moved to tears by them.
In spite of the diplomatic language of
the report, what clearly emerges is that the policy adopted by the UK was
both cruel and ineffective and must never be allowed to happen again and
that there are unanswered questions about why Britain did not vaccinate (
and why farmers were so mis-led ) and did behave in the way it did.
The
most diplomatic section of all is on the legality of the 3km contiguous cull
- its pronouncement that the legality is something that must be "decided by
the courts" could hardly be clearer.
The draft document supports the
simple common-sense view that warmwell has taken all along; where we have
tests and vaccines that work it is madness not to use them. The fact that
they were not used, that a mass slaughter policy, brutal to animals and
humans alike was used instead, is a dark indictment of our society's ethics.
So few of us shouted out against it. So few really knew or cared what was
going on. The disproportionate influence of the interested, ambitious and
powerful drivers of the policy has still not been properly investigated -
but at least the
draft report is here and can be read in full.
Oct 2 ~ EU draft document on UK opposition to vaccination
(see document)
"some farmers' opposition to vaccinations was evidently due to the mistaken
belief that EU law prohibited the payment of compensation for the possible
loss of value of vaccinated animals....Relatively small special-interest
groups (parts of the meat-producing farming sector and the food trade) seem
to have had an undue influence over decisions affecting the wellbeing of
whole regions in the management of the FMD outbreak in the UK in 2001. This
is all the more worrying because fears in the food trade that consumers
would not accept products from vaccinated livestock were
unsubstantiated."
Oct 2 ~" only the courts can definitively determine whether the 3 km cull
was legal"
(EU draft report)
"The 3 km cull which was ordered in Cumbria and in Dumfries and Galloway,
which entailed culling sheep, pigs and goats within a 3 km radius of an
infected farm, may not have had a basis in domestic law, irrespective of
the question of the practicability and proportionality of this measure.
However, only the courts can definitively determine whether the 3 km cull
was legal. It is not apparent that this is either explicitly permitted or
explicitly prohibited at European level."
Oct 2 ~ should also have regard for changes in people's way of life and in
attitudes towards the environment and animal welfare
"....measures to tackle FMD should not only -- as on previous occasions
-- be regarded as an operation to police the epidemic with the aim of
safeguarding livestock holdings or particular commercial interests but
should also have regard for changes in people's way of life and in attitudes
towards the environment and animal welfare and increased mobility, combined
with a cost-benefit analysis of any given control strategy.."
Oct 2 ~ "The practice adhered to in compensating farmers in the event of
an FMD outbreak is unjust."
It is not clear why only farmers whose animals have been culled should
receive compensation, while none is paid to farmers who have been unable to
market animals or animal products properly because of the ban on
transport...." (paragraph 72)
Oct 2 ~ Vaccination - the EU Draft Document
"The Commission is called upon, on the basis of the experience of 2001,
to draw up a cost-benefit analysis of prophylactic vaccination, which was
successfully employed by a number of Member States before 1992. This study
should include an analysis of the advantages and disadvantages in the field
of international trade, public opinion and marketing possibilities within
the EU" (paragraph 113)
"The way in which Uruguay tackled FMD in 2001
demonstrates the considerable positive aspects of emergency vaccination
without subsequent slaughter "
"many of the experts stressed that, under
certain conditions, emergency vaccination is a better way of controlling FMD
than the 'stamping out' method. ...
Mass culling of livestock and the
subsequent destruction of meat can be ethically justified only by special
socioeconomic grounds. Decisions must be taken in a transparent
manner.."
The vaccines currently available make it possible -- at least
on a herd by herd basis -- to distinguish between infected and vaccinated
animals....... many experts consider the risk of transmission of FMD by
carrier animals to be extremely slight....The international recognition of
serological tests to demonstrate the presence of antibodies to 3ABC or other
non-structural proteins -- at least on a herd by herd basis -- for the
purposes of regaining 'FMD-free' status more rapidly after emergency
vaccination is a vital element in decision-making on vaccination in the
event of an outbreak of FMD....before 'FMD-free' status can (now) be
regained to 6 months in the event of emergency vaccination without
subsequent culling...
emergency vaccination with the aim of allowing
animals to live for normal further use should no longer be regarded only as
a last resort for controlling FMD but must be considered as a first-choice
option from the outset when an outbreak occurs, except in the case of the
actual farms which unequivocally have to be regarded as infected. ...
As
members of the OIE, Member States should, in cooperation with the
Commission, seek to ensure that OIE rules constantly keep pace with
scientific progress in the development of vaccines and test procedures and
that OIE procedures permit rapid decision-making.
The Commission and
Member States are called upon to actively strive to bring the waiting period
for regaining FMD-free status after application of a strategy of vaccination
without subsequent slaughter of the vaccinated animals into line with the
period used when a vaccination-to-kill policy is applied, in other words
3 months in both cases.
Oct 2 ~ Contingency Planning
"Member States should review their contingency plans in the light of
experience of the FMD crisis in 2001 -- particularly with reference to the
staff available for deployment, equipment and laboratory capacity -- and
should test them regularly. ...should be based on risk analysis and provide
for various scenarios so that even major outbreaks can be kept under
control. ..... should be so designed that emergency vaccinations can be
carried out as a control measure of first choice from the beginning of an
outbreak. .... should establish compatible, networked electronic animal
epidemic information systems containing and linking all information which
is of relevance for the purposes of effective management of livestock
epidemics, into which relevant information from the operatives on the ground
(especially vets) can be input in real time in the event of an outbreak.
....should provide an integrated crisis management system and short lines
of communication to the bodies involved and,.... assign decision-making
powers to local or regional level.
95. The establishment of
continuous contact, upstream and downstream, between all the
organisations concerned (public authorities, farmers, members of the
public) should play a leading part in the drafting of contingency plans
and should receive particular attention in the Commission's evaluations
thereof."
Oct 2 ~ Research and Development
"The Commission should immediately designate a Community reference
laboratory for vesicular virus diseases, which should maintain contact
with the officially designated national laboratories, assist them and be in
a position to make optimal methods of diagnosis of vesicular virus diseases
of animals available, perform experiments and field trials relevant to
FMD and provide information and further-training programmes.
The
Commission and Member States should provide more funding and coordination
for research into livestock diseases which figure in the OIE's A list and
occur or are likely to occur in the EU, with the aim of facilitating
systematic vaccination. In the case of FMD, the priorities should be as
follows:
- to improve vaccines with the aim of developing a vaccine which needs
to be administered only once and which covers as many serotypes as
possible, builds up protection very quickly and blocks transmission of the
virus in order to exclude carrier status,
- to improve tests with the aim of reliably distinguishing between
vaccinated animals and animals which are both vaccinated and infected and
detecting FMD earlier than hitherto after an infection,
- mathematical models which will improve prediction of the impact of the
various control strategies, including vaccination."
Oct 2 ~ protection of animals during transport.
(Is this the paragraph from the EU Draft Report that Mrs Beckett would
like people to think was her own?) " Member States are called upon to
transpose properly Directive 91/628/EEC (as amended by Directive 95/29/EC)
on the protection of animals during transport. The Commission should submit
a legislative proposal to set a limit of 8 hours or 500 km on
journeys by cattle, horses, goats, sheep and pigs not intended for specific
breeding and/or sporting purposes." (para 117)
Oct 2 ~ The EU Draft document in full
Oct 1/2 ~ "Britain's handling of the foot and mouth crisis was branded
cruel, incompetent and confused ......apparent attempts by the government to
stifle the EU committee findings have failed..." .
Interestingly, it is the
DailyMail report that is chosen for the EPP-Ed (European Parliament)
group news page.
Sean Poulter's forthright article : "Britain's handling
of the foot and mouth crisis was branded cruel, incompetent and confused
yesterday. The report of an EU investigation into last year's alert reveals
the lack of a valid contingency plan, crippling bureaucracy and animal
suffering on a massive scale. ...Farmers were bullied into allowing their
livestock to be killed, the report says, while many of the animals suffered
at the hands of poorly-trained slaughtermen.
It suggests that apparent
attempts by the government to stifle the EU committee findings have failed.
Agriculture Minister Lord Whitty visited the committee chairman, German
Social Democrat MEP Wolfgang Kreissl-Doerfler, before the inquiry to put his
Government's case. But the report pulls no punches over official
involvement....One of the most damning findings is that the strategy of a
mass cull probably did not work. The crisis could have been eased with
vaccinations, the report says, but the Government bowed to pressure..."
Oct 1/2 ~ What has the FSA got against sheep sausage skins and why do they
seem determined to ban them despite existing evidence to the contrary ?
We hear today from the Natural Sausage Casings
Association - aghast that the FSA, in the face of all
evidence, is determined to ban sheep intestines from the food chain. The
email concludes, "Is there something that they know about sheep casings
which they are keeping quiet ? If so, what about the lymph nodes and
mutton?"
That is something that we would all like to know. There is
something here that reeks of dishonesty and cover-up. The is no BSE in the
National sheep flock. Why is the FSA behaving as if there were and causing
such a nationwide suspicion of sheep meat that the industry is now under
even more pressure?
Oct 1/2 ~ The Drummond Report. Wise before the event.
The government will be finding all kinds of ways to distance themselves
from the findings of the EU Draft report on FMD. There will be much made of
words such as "unprecedented", "wise after the event" and "best scientific
advice". Dr Iain Anderson insisted he had taken "meticulous" care to avoid
making criticisms with the benefit of hindsight.
But what was needed to
avoid the disaster that befell the UK in 2001 was not hindsight, but the
simple removal of Maff's complacent, arrogantly defensive, bureaucratic
blindfold which so obstructed their clear sightedness back in January 1999.
In that month, Richard Drummond's report had recommended five broad
areas of improvement for the State Veterinary Field Service to improve its
state of readiness in the event of an outbreak of disease such as foot and
mouth:
- Training
- Contingency Planning
- Infected Premises Work
- Use of IT in Outbreak Control
- Staffing and Direction
In each case, he suggested the formation
of working groups to take matters forward - and nothing happened.
Stark
warnings were made in the Drummond Report. It predicts virtually every
disaster that befell the Government in the early weeks of last year's
crisis, from the untested nature of contingency plans and the lack of vets,
to the problems of disposal and vaccination.
Reading it is
heartbreaking. The failures were known and the solutions were recommended in
commendable detail. Nothing happened. The answers to the questionnaire at
the end of the Report are particularly revealing. (See Drummond Report)
Oct 1 ~ an inquiry concluded that the culling of more than 6.5 million
animals may have played no real role in curbing the spread of the
disease.
oday's Independent "DRAFT
CONCLUSIONS FROM A OM"MITTEE OF MEPS LISTS SWEEPING CRITICISMS OF GOVERNMENT
POLICY AND SUGGESTS THAT, IN FUTURE, VACCINATION SHOULD BE CONSIDERED MUCH
EARLIER IN AN OUTBREAK...IN PARTICULAR THE DOCUMENT ARGUED THAT THE
CONTROVERSIAL CULLING POLICY MAY, IN EFFECT, HAVE BEEN UNNECESSARY. "IT
REMAINS CONTROVERSIAL AND DOUBTFUL WHETHER THE 24/48 HOURS CONTIGUOUS CULL
STRATEGY WAS REALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR CURBING THE EPIDEMIC [HALTING THE
INCREASE IN THE NUMBER" F CASES AND BRINGING ABOUT A DECREASE]," THE
DOCUMENT STATED. "APART FROM ANY OTHER CONSIDERATION, IN MANY CASES
IT"PROVED IMPOSSIBLE TO C"RRY OUT THE CULLS ON NEIGHBOURING FARMS WITHIN 48
HOURS." " THE CONCLUSIONS OF THE RAPPORTEUR OF THE PARLIAMENT'S TEMPORARY
COMMITTEE, WOLFGANG KREISSL-DVRFLER, MAKE FRANK CRITICISMS OF THE
GOVERNMENT'S HANDLING OF THE OUTBREAK, WHICH BROUGHT ECONOMIC DEVASTATION TO
MUCH OF THE COUNTRYSIDE. ..."
This is the general message of most of the
papers (even the
Expre"s manages "Government slammed over farm virus")" who report the EU
I"quiry draft. An interesting excep"ion is the Financial Times. John Mason, Food and Rural Affairs
Correspondent begins, "TOURISM AND OTHER INDUSTRIES HIT BY FUTURE OUTBREAKS
OF FOOT-AND-MOUTH" DISEASE IN EUROPE SHOULD RECEIVE COMPENSATION SIMILAR TO
FARMERS ...." HE CHOOSES TO IGNORE THE CRITICISMS DIRECTED AT THE UK
GOVERNMENT FOR THE WAY ITS P"LICIES TRAUMATISED FARMERS AND BROKE ANIMAL
WELFARE LAWS. INSTEAD, HE PURSUES THE LINE THAT IT WAS NOT FAIR THAT "OTHER
SECTORS OF THE ECONOMY - PARTICULARLY "OURISM - ARE COMPELLED TO FOOT THE
BILL FOR THEIR OWN LOSSES ARISING FROM THIS POLICY." THIS IS, OF COURSE,
TRUE ENOUGH - BUT THE REPORT IS ODD IN DISREGARDING THE CONDEMNATORY"TONE OF
THE EU REPORT. THE TIMES REPORT OF THE EU DRAFT DOCUMENT: Ministers made outbreak worse,
say MEPs".... In individual cases"it was also re"orted that farmers
affected had been intimid"ted and pressurised in connection with the culls,"
the report says.
" "These shortcomings caused considerable stress among
those concerned, many of "hom were still suffering psychologically as a
result months after the crisis." "
Oct 1 ~ "Government attacked over farm virus" Press Association
"The Government's handling of the foot-and-mouth crisis traumatised
farmers and broke a"imal welfare laws, a report into the outbreak says.
A draft document drawn up by a special European Parliament committee of
inquiry blames officialdom for adding to farmers' woes with red tape and
bureaucratic delays in dealing with the disposal of slaughtered animals. It
also says the slimming down of the state veterinary service over a 20-year
period "weakened the capacity for responding to the crisis". .htt"://www.pa.pr"ss.net/home_news.2.html
Oct
1 ~ " the non-vaccination policy can not continue. " Albert Maat
One of several pres" releases from EPP-Ed show that the draft docu"ent
referred to above is unlikely to please the authorities in Britain with its
phrases such as "traumatised farmers" "excessive red tape" " broken animal
welfare rules We will link to the actual draft document as soon as possible.
.
Example of recent pres release: European
Parliament Committee hears of government arrogance In Holland as in the
UK "Hundreds of angry farmers protested outside the meeting room against the
EU non-vaccination policy and a number of petitions were given to the
MEP's..... Dutch MEP Albert Jan Maat was deeply impressed by the social
repercussions of the crisis. "To prevent the spreading of FMD schoolboys and
girls were not allowed to leave the farm for some time. They witnessed the
culling of hundreds of animals. Some farmers committed suicide because they
lost generations of hard work." .... Farmers had to fill in numerous
documents to get financial compensation. Due to the red tape many farmers
did not reply in a administratively correct manner. The result was a severe
cut in the compensation, with no possibility to rectify their administrative
errors. .... ...With the introduction of marker-vaccines, and a new policy
concerning the transport of animals, we must try to start a new policy. The
introduction of the possibility of at least ring-vaccination is
necessary."
Oct 1 ~ mass culling of livestock and the subsequent destruction of meat
could only be justified on socio-economic grounds.
The Epp-Ed group yesterday (Sept 30) met Professor Ian McConnell, who
led the vaccination group of the UK's Royal Society FMD Inquiry team. This
was followed by a consideration of the Temporary Committee's pre-draft
report.
BRUSSELS,
Sept 30 (Reuters) - EU member states should apply emergency vaccination
as a matter of course rather than a last resort if faced by the risk of
highly contagious foot-and-mouth disease, a draft European Parliament report
showed on Monday.
In a working paper obtained by Reuters, the
long-awaited document said the decision to vaccinate was a political one,
while mass culling of livestock and the subsequent destruction of meat could
only be justified on socio-economic grounds......Emergency vaccination with
the aim of allowing animals to live for normal further use should no longer
be regarded only as a last resort for controlling FMD but must be considered
as a first-choice option from the outset when an outbreak occurs," said the
draft, submitted to the Parliament's FMD Committee.
"Decisions must be
taken in a transparent manner: otherwise it will be difficult to persuade
those sections of the population who suffer most from a non-vaccination
policy to provide the necessary cooperation during a future FMD
outbreak."
"....Britain's handling of the crisis was not helped by low
numbers of full-time veterinary staff and closures of local
veterinary centres, it said. Britain had to deploy hundreds of foreign vets,
sowing confusion and uncertainty among farmers." (Read more)
Oct 1 ~ We are arguing that the FSA should be removed as a precautionary
measure against Transmissable Spongythinking Incapability
Can it be possible that Sir John Krebs was unaware (reported on our "Today" page on Sept
20) of the result of the EU Scientific Steering Committee (SSC) on BSE
which, at its meeting 12-13 September 2002, examined the most recent data on
the safety with regard of BSE, of sheep casings and concluded that there
is no additional or new evidence justifying the possible inclusion of sheep
casings in the list of specified risk materials ?
Yet, over two
weeks later, we read in The
Sunday Telegraph (September 29, 2002) Letters to the Editor...from Sir
John Krebs
"Christopher Booker (News,
September 22) continues to claim that the Food Standards Agency is
campaigning to link sheep with BSE. The simple fact is that no one knows if
BSE is in sheep and we are seeking to reduce that uncertainty (sic). Sheep
intestines could constitute a significant risk if BSE were to be found in
the National Flock. That is why we argue they should be removed from the
food chain as a precautionary measure."
BSE has not been found in the
National Flock. The scaremongering about lamb, the ill-advised National
Scrapie Plan and the juggernaut Animal Health Bill - based, as they all
three are, upon politically driven pseudo-science just as the FMD policies
have been -are viewed with deep disgust by real experts and by real farmers.
Luckily, there are those both in the UK and in Europe who are not drawn into
this thoroughly unpleasant nonsense and are speaking out against it.
Oct 1 ~ The Liskeard bull gets the all-clear exactly one year after the
last recorded case - and nothing has changed
Jan Kelly, the Cornwall DVM, still in post and still apparently unable
to diagnose FMD, said: "It looked very much like foot-and-mouth but the
lesions weren't typical of the disease." (sic)
So where were the
rapid diagnostic tests to save all the uncertainty and worry? Dr Roger
Breeze wrote to the Royal Society Inquiry (here) "...By February
2001 we had developed and tested in the laboratory a remarkable assay that
detected all 7 serotypes of FMD virus and differentiated FMD virus from
other vesicular diseases of livestock and from other RNA viruses.
......Given the extensive validation studies in vitro and in vivo that had
already taken place at Plum Island, our expectations were that after
a short familiarization period (1 to 2 days) for UK colleagues at Pirbright
we would be able to take the devices and tests into the field during the
2001 FMD outbreak in cooperation with UK authorities from Pirbright or MAFF.
"
The tests were available in March 2001
They were disregarded by the same "We know best" arrogance that is
destroying Britain's farming.
After the millions of healthy animals
dead, the battering of the last nails into the coffin of the rural economy,
the irreversible destruction of faith in DEFRA, the heartbreak and the
suicides and the billions of wasted pounds in businesses and tourism - one
would have hoped that someone would have thought it sensible to USE a rapid
diagnostic test last week. But we still have no contingency plan for such
scares.
"12 months on, rural life is still a long way from normal....."
proclaims the FWi
and one wonders bleakly how many of its readers found this a startlingly
novel piece of information.
Oct 1 ~ Elliot Morley insists the 20-day rule will remain in place at
least until the end of the year.
This looks vindictive as well as unnecessary. We hear that many real
veterinary experts (as opposed to the highly politicised Defra spin vets)
have said that 20 days is far too long even if there were a real fear of the
disease. "Two months ago, the government pledged a £421m increase in the
rural affairs budget to help rebuild the countryside over the next three
years... " says the FWi "Much of the money
will be used to fund recommendations made by Sir Donald Curry's commission
into the future of food and farming. But many proposals are a long way
from filtering down to ordinary farmers. Proposals include plans for the
electronic identification of livestock and for better protection from
illegal food imports"...
"....Will Cockbain said: "Controls at ports have
been pathetic. Farmers and the rural community cannot go through another
disease outbreak."
"...Animal movement restrictions continue to hamper
livestock sales. Countryside minister Elliot Morley insists the 20-day rule
will remain in place at least until the end of the year. The rule restricts
livestock movements off holdings for 20 days when new animals are brought on
to farms...."
The only "good news" that the article can find is the piece
of trivia that Phoenix is now in calf. (see article) There
have been widespread problems administering the animal restrictions left by
the epidemic - with Government forms being branded as "gibberish" by
Westmorland and Lonsdale MP Tim Collins.
Oct 1 ~ The part of the national Scrapie Plan that doesn't get talked
about
A Cumbria farmer writes, " "I had my vet out last week and he was
telling me that a farmer in Cumbria had his pedigree flock of Texels scrapie
tested and because the tests were below R3 50 ram lambs were killed and half
of his ewes; Did that get into the press? NO" Read more
Sept 30 ~ there'd be all this noise of lambs crying for their mothers, and
ewes crying for their lambs and then silence. All that life-- and then,
nothing.
Bonnie Durrance, the Californian film-maker, after looking at the Rex
Pyke's tape "In the
Shadow" wrote, " It so powerfully illustrated the comment of a man I
interviewed in Marlborough, a huntsman and very decent fellow who'd been
called up to work as a slaughterman at Great Orton. "If you thought about
it, you'd go crazy," he said. "the trucks would roll in and there'd be all
this noise of lambs crying for their mothers, and ewes crying for their
lambs and then silence. All that life-- and then, nothing."
What those
scenes show, in their quiet, uneditorialized way, is what it looks like to
destroy innocent life. It's like witnessing a rape. A sin.
Whether or
not it will ever bring those responsible to justice, at least those of us
with the power of speech can help to call what has happened by name."
Bonnie's film about the reality of FMD 2001 in the UK is now finished.
".. Someone here, talking about the effects of 9/11 and the subsequent
threats to civil liberties resulting from the clamping down by the justice
department, said that the people he was most proud of are the "dissenters",
those who stand up for their civil liberties, even when fear threatens to
bring out the worst in the government. I feel that way about your staunch
group, and am burning to get the film finished so I can show their resolve
to the world!
I truly believe that as the world becomes more complicated
and independence and the relationships we value become inevitably more
threatened, the stand that you all have taken, in knowledge,
self-reflection, solidarity and love- for humans, animals, and life itself-
will be the example the rest of us must learn to follow."
Warmwell very
much hopes that someone in the media will have the courage to show Bonnie
Durrance's film.
Archive from september 2002
onwards